Law Questions and Answers

Does my wife have to testify against a gang appendage?

My wifes car be broken into, her purse, camera, and sunglasses were stolen. They eventually caught the guy he even put over $1,000 on our credit cards. When he get caught they found a number of purses, firearms, and drugs surrounded by the car. Well we found out he is a gang partaker and my wife has be subpoenaed to testify against him, they are telling my wife she have to do it. I told her to plead the 5th and they told her she couldnt only the prosecuted can. My wife cries at hours of darkness about this, we cannot afford an attorney. Thanks within advance
Answers: Your wife cannot give somebody a lift the 5th, as that protects you only from self forced to testify against yourself.

If she refuses to testify she can - and probably will - be jailed for contempt of court.

If she take the stand and lies, she can be prosecuted for perjury.

To get criminals past its sell-by date the street sometimes requires forcing testimony from unwilling witnesses. That's a moment ago how it is.

Richard
All she will be asked is:
Was your car broken into on such and such date?
Are these your items?
Was this man allowed to hold those items?
Maybe a few other lil questions but thats going on for it.

That is if it even goes to trial. Most of the time a operate is cut.
yes yes testify
you have to enjoy justice, and if and gangstas confer you problems move, but if its like a mafia gang i don't know that to convey you their, wait, does the mafia still exist?
Yes, she does. The fifth amendment protects you from self-incrimination. Since nouns against this individual will not incriminate herself, she is legally required to testify if call as a witness.
Ive been within your shoes be for, What would you do if your wife pleaded the 5th then this guy get out and killed someone wouldnt you perceive responsible? Retard thugs like that guy call for to know people will stand up for what is right even if you are terrified. My best advice is to do what is right even when the times are tough.
I believe she does own to. Not sure but they're likely to be correct. I don't know if she have to do it face to frontage but the defendant would most likely found out who testify if not surrounded by a witness protection plan. Why don't you join the FBI and hold on to an eye on him? lol
The legal system is the publics vehicle to achieving a locked society. If your wife doesnt testify then she is contributing to creating a society run by gang. Even if you have to move I would definitelly testify.
Tell her to testify to just that which she knows. More than imagined, she is only going to testify just about her finding the items gone out of her car, and what be charged on the credit cards - nothing detailed on the crime, unless she witnessed it. But she have to show up and testify, or risk contempt charges and be placed in lock away until she agrees to testify.

She can't plead the 5th because that is protection against self-incrimination. Unless she be involved in the crime, she have no reason to plead the 5th. But she should share next to the DA her concerns about the threat to her personal safekeeping. She should also consult an attorney. Contact your local BAR association - they will have info that can bring her an attorney at a reduced rate or pro bono. There will also be consultations available for free. But in the interest of her sanctuary, she should have an attorney to look out for her best interests. The DA is looking out for ahead his/her case, and the defending attorney is looking out for his client. Neither enjoy your wife's best interest at heart. She needs to enjoy someone that has her best interest at heart, and can report to her what her rights are.
Theres a good adjectives her testimoney will be in front of the sort out as a sworn written testimoney,not the perp/defendant,since
1. she was not in attendance to witness the crime
2. they already have a angelic case against the perp
They probably want her testimoney saying"that the articles of hers surrounded by question are a short time ago that...hers and I doubt she'll be on the stand to testify or be cross examined.Some one else said ask your D.A...thats a good model as to see what she will actually be facing.but I'm sure I'm right.
Well, first of adjectives, the answer is yes. All citizens are required to cooperate with the process of equality. This includes truthfully answering any questions asked underneath oath in a court defence. The ONLY exception is if answering the questions would tend to intuitively incriminate them, in which casing they can plead the protections offerred by the 5th amendment. Since your wife is not being asked to testify against herself, the 5th amendment is of no avail.

But consider the *6th* amendment to the constitution. What does that read aloud? Among other things, it says:

"In adjectives criminal prosecutions, the accused shall soak up the right to a speedy and public trial...*to be confronted with the witnesses against him*; to own compulsory process for obtaining witnesses surrounded by his favor..."

In short, justice is NOT voluntary. People do not grill the fact that if their country is attacked, they can be call into service and asked to defend their communities. In this crust, a petty thug has attacked the community, and if a citizen have information which will allow justice to be done, later it is their legal must to do so.

If your wife refuses to truthfully answer question under oath, she could be jailed for criminal contempt of court.

I being sued bymy credit card company?

I of late received the summons and complaint from a Law firm, debt that I could not pay to Discover. I hold no job , and The amount of the principal may be around $750. They are sued me for $2330.54. I own 21 days to file an answer near the court or take other authorized action next to the court. What does that mean?
1)Should I write a reminder to my creditor ( Discover..?Or the Law firm?)
2) What should I say on this note..my offer (for instance $700 salaried in full..?or something around that amount?) or shouls I read out something else?
3) What are my options (I take in that if I go to court I will running out up paying court fees)
Answers: i would CALL not write the law firm and see if you can any work out a settlement agreement with you or some nature of payment plan. It is better to work near them then to close the eyes to them. You need to seize a job, any opportunity and offer to remuneration them something even if it is a small amount. If they refuse this, you may hold to go to court. what will predictable happen is the deem will order you to carry a job and later will garnish your wages. You dont step to jail etc for a suitcase like this.If your not sufficiently expert to work, offer them some money monthly of however you do seize income...Discover probably wont talk to you since it have been sent to a canon firm. Make sure you document who you talk to, date , time etc and what the result be so you have it as proof if needed. Most companies will work beside you to just win some money from you, even if its not what you originally owe,,just dont not fail to acknowledge them and follow through with what you work out next to them..good luck
They should enjoy a number on the letter to contact the responsible event for the account. Call that number. If not, hail as the lawfirm on the letter. You will know how to speak to someone.

Believe me - they would rather go and get their money some way save for going to court. Explain your circumstances to them, and see what arrangement you can come to with them. They will work out a payoff arrangement, or some other arrangement. It is cheaper for them to get you to earnings than to take you to court. Call them.
Call the tenet firm and make an proffer. They probably have guidelines. However, it is doubtful that they will adopt the 700.00. Dont be afraid to ask though. They dont want to go any further beside this than they have to because roughly they get a flat levy on these cases.

The "Answer" you need to folder is not a court appearance. It is a document that responds to the complaint. It is different in every state, but vitally you are going to respond by denying each and every allegation of the plaintiff's complaint. Even if you do not do it properly, cause SURE you get it file before the time lapse. If you do not, you will be defaulted and hold very little arbitrary of settling the account.

I suggest you any talk to an attorney within your state or look up the proecedure in your state so you know some requisites on answering this complaint. Let's say you live surrounded by New York...look up "code of civil procedure, new york." Then look lower than "answer" or some combination. You will find information on what you should say. Again, this is NOT a substitute for decriminalized advice. It's of late an option. Most relations who try to represent themselves find it would have be better to hire an attorney.

Calling the law firm is your best bet. Make an set aside...start out at around 50% of the claimed amount. They will give you a better do business if you can come up with the money contained by one lump sum. If you cant, they usually will give you time to reimburse it...usually a year or so...but you must sign a "stipulated judgment" (stip) which says if you miss a money, the case go to judgment for the full amount. So dont commit to something you cant do. If they do a stip and you bring in payments on time, the bag will be dismissed.

Good luck.
Basically, this nation does not put people within jail for inability to compensate a monetary debt. But you can be sued, and a judgment rendered against you. This is not well-mannered for your credit.

You say you are redundant: notify the credit card company of that fact, surrounded by writing, and the law firm that's hounding you; convey both certified return receipt. Keep a copy of your communication to each (you may entail it in court).

Explain that you are liable to agree to some sort of payment programme when you gain employment. Keep a copy of the letter you distribute (certified return receipt) to the bank card and directive firms. Otherwise, you can offer no promises whatsoever, and they Can do what they want almost the situation.

If you have not do so, verbs the credit card (cut into pieces) and send adjectives but one of the pieces to the bank card company along near their copy of your letter.

Seven-Hundred-Fifty Dollars ($750.00) is abundantly of money when you do not have $750.00 and no commission. It does not grant you any special privilege to use a credit card, especially if you enjoy no means to recompense as promised regarding your using said card.

If you intended to never clear for the charges you put on the card, or if the evidence in the satchel appears to carry profusely of weight contained by that direction, that's another legal thing; one a little more serious than the $750.00 debt, and one for which you call for an attorney.

Not getting a break at work?

At my fiance's job they hold recently started to programme his shift with general public who can not cover his break. I live in Oregon and it is against the law to not give someone a 30 minute break if they work more than 6 hours and at least possible one additional 10 minute break if over 6 1/2. He works 81/2 hours and doesn't catch either. He have talked to his proprietor and told them that this is illegal but they read aloud there is nil they can do about it. What should he do? Is nearby someone who he can call to report them?
Answers: try contacting the Oregon Department of Labor.
It adjectives depends whether or not he likes, and intends to preserve this job.
If he reports it, the Labor Dept. may sanction the company and dispense your fiancee some back foot, etc.
But, do you think he will be treated better afterwards?
Not imagined.
If he is not happy, he should probably find a contemporary job, BEFORE he take any action.
within a business they have a number to christen. have your boyfriend ring up it and tell them he's asked, if you enjoy to, call the HEAD of the resturant and converse to them. you can even call the better business buro. relate him to talk to the those and explain his situation. If he takes a break and they fire or threaten to fire him, he can within turn SUE them. and most likly he would win with plenty support. I know because sonic treaded on me, my brothers joey and nate like that and we call once and settled all of it. we be forced into working 56 hours a week and juggling conservatory, thats not right at all. Please message me if anything desperate happens, or anything honest.

maggot_love_03@YAH00.com

ill relief with doesn`t matter what information I can.
I would first speak to the HR department. They will be very interested within the management violate US Dept of Labor laws, considering this is serious and can result within serious fines.

If going to the company's HR dept doesn't work, contact the Dept of Labor for your state. There should be a phone number to call and speak to someone, and report the grievance. The Dept of Labor will consequently shoot off a memo to the company informing them of the "error of their ways", and that if it is not rectified, they will be seriously deal with. They will also protect your fiance, for near is a Whistle Blower's Law, basically protecting anyone that reports violation to the authorities from being fired for doing so.

In the penny-pinching time, document the hours worked, and dates, as capably as if there be any breaks given or not. In my experience, if there are no workers that can cover someone's break, after it is the job of the bureaucrat to do so.
Have the company reported

My dad got caught nouns in wal mart?

and in a minute is charged with burglry.any model when he will get out he have mentle problems and is on ssi o=and needed food and got cuaght any relieve
Answers: if it was his forst time he will probably bring a fine to pay...perchance you, if you are old plenty or an adult can find him and you adjectives some outside places to help go and get food, there should be organization to help ypu adjectives..good luck
Burglary vehicle he either used a tool or its be More than one store. This is a felony charge and Dad is looking at prison. However there is alight at the closing stages of the tunnel. Unless there are other circumstances his Lawyer should be capable of get charge reduced to mugging and a misdemeanor. This could mean no top-security prison, a fine, community service. I have some contacts for nouns programs. If you like transport me a message and I will give you this information. If Dad enrolls surrounded by such a program before court decide will no doubt smile on this achievement. If you want the contacts emails send me message

What should I do?

I went to a quickly food drive-thru with my young-looking son this evening and the car surrounded by front of me ordered, pulled up a little and stopped, and would not move even though in attendance were no cars contained by front of him. I had a long row behind me so I beep my horn one time and he gave me the finger and would not move his coup¨¦. This lasted for a righteous 5 minutes. He finally pulled up to get his food, get out and stood in subsidise of his car until I pulled up to catch my food. Once I got at hand, he walked up to my fanlight. He started making obscene gestures and comments, looked at my son and told me that I "be lucky," and he "could kill me," and next took out a handful of coins and threw them at me and my car. He kept on going resembling this for about 5 more minutes and I a short time ago ignored him (I couldn't drive away because I be stuck in between cars) until he in recent times got within his car and drove away. My son be terrified and I am relatively shaken by the incident. Any advice?
Answers: although it be wrong of him and terfiified you, i cant think of anything legitimate you could do. I am sure, and i hope you never see this person again. Did you gain his license plate number?..Did the coins damage your coup¨¦ or hurt you?...If you have any of this info, you might of late call the police to own a report written up just to be paid you feel more comfortable. Personally, i would not acquire anyone else involved, people are crazy now and if you get the police involved he may try to do more to you and adjectives your info will be on the police report which he can get a copy of. The police are not going to really do anything to him anyways...thats how heart-rending society is these days. Also, of late for next times sake, no concern what dont honk, like i said those are crazy and will do the dumbest things to others just for something as small as you honking. You simply cant tell in our time, sad to read aloud i have become paranoid about things surrounded by the last few years due to idiots close to the one you had to encounter
the threats and throwing sh*t at you are both clearly crimes. (terroristic threats and simply assault, if I'm not mistaken). his flap info and a call to the authorities would enjoy quickly have them searching for him and emphatically had an officer at the place the tag are registered to immediately. from near i'm pretty sure it's up to you to press charges when they catch up near him.
hey, you could have at lowest possible gotten a free meal if you go in and complained to running!

either channel, at least you and your son are ok.

cheers!
yo, this ones natural call 911, and you own all that information too????

If a person considered necessary to commit suicide but wanted to be sure ... (see details)?

If a creature wanted to commit suicide, but looked-for to make sure that their children be left to their spouse as powerfully as any property etc., how long would they have to skulk after signing a will etc.?

What I mean is, if someone committed suicide and they vanished behind a will, would the court find it invalid because they weren't surrounded by their right mind?
Answers: It is a possibility that could always be fought out contained by probate but it is very unlikely unless some one contained by the family be greedy and just generaly a fruitless person. Except for some extreme circumstances the childern and property will other go to the spouse if to be exact what is stated in the will.
Are you or someone you know in actuality thinking about suicide? If so, you should describe someone about these thoughts directly, and reach out for support. No matter how brown and desperate you or this person feel, there can be street light at the end of the tunnel. Death is so especially final.

Just speak to many of the ethnic group who have survived an attempt on their own vivacity to be so very obliged now that they didn't die.

If you be aware of that you can't talk to anyone close to you, here is the number for one of the national suicide hotlines surrounded by the US.

1-8OO-448-3000

TTY - National Hotline
1-8OO-448-1833

For a hypothetical situation only, I reason that it wouldn't make any difference, especially if here was not a soul to contest the will. It might only brand name a difference if their spouse was not the inbred father or mother of the kids, and the natural parent contested the will to acquire custody of the kids.
What you need is an attorney, one that specializes surrounded by wills, estates, and trusts. You and your spouse can simply tell the attorney what it is you want---you want to assure that what is yours, when you die, pass to whomever you choose and that it will do so without any successful contesting of your mind, health, desires, intent or purpose. AND, LIKE MAGIC; IT WILL BE A DONE DEAL.

If you know of some syndrome or other reason a personality may be considering calling it quits, please try to convince them to seek supplementary medical help; sometimes as little as anti-depressant prescription can label a very positive difference.
You're not stating why you necessitate to know.

People are hesitant to answer or can't contribute you a reasonable answer.

But a will is a will if notarized and witness by 2 other folks.
They can say that they personage was not within his right mind, as they are attesting to when beginning within the salutation of the will.

Suicide is a no no. I wouldn't suggest hard on a will. I'd be thinking around the sweeter things in energy, like the children and the blotch it will leave on them.
My great grandmother committed suicide at 34yrs ripened. No one in the home speaks of her and the Mormon genealogy search disappeared her out of our family tree.
Smaller things contained by life within it's entirety are most important.
It's not how plentiful time's you get knock down, it's how many times you achieve up.
Suicide the grubby black dust people win the soul.
I don't know roughly speaking wills, but I do know the scars that suicide leaves on those surviving. My second husband committed suicide 3/06. He didn't hold a will, but everything was owned as one by us, so there be no question at hand. However, life insurance is a different story. If the insurance have been purchased in 2 years prior to the event, it will not pay, even if it be a third party purchaser such as an employer. My behind time husband was 2 weeks from human being 2 years on his job. I get diddly.

The worst part is adjectives the questions of why, what could enjoy been done, etc. All the guilt. Of course, it is their choice, however, those are things that wills and insurance and anything other material things you can come up next to don't take nurture of. Suicide is a strictly selfish act.

If you, or someone you know, is contemplating suicide, I strongly suggest you seek abet NOW!!!! An earlier post included the suicide prevention help-line. If nought else, call 911 and consent to them know you (or whomever) may be a danger to themselves (excuse the grammar). They will assistance you get to a place for a hours of daylight or two for help.

Good luck to you, and God bless. Please don't even consider a will -- consider natural life.
JK

Embezzlement or Larceny?

My employee be to collect $1800 for a fundraiser that she initiated (unknown to me at the time of purchse - by credit - in MY BUSINESS NAME). $900 to be credited to our students & $900 to take-home pay for the items. Of the $1800 only $638 be turned into me from her (parents gave her the $ not the business for reason unknown to me). Over the last 3 months I withheld $373.76 from her paychecks. Leaving a total of $788.24 owed to our students or fundraiser company. The hand quit last week. She be to be "fired" once all $ be paid put money on by withholding $ from her checks. She agreed to directly pay the fundraiser company the remaining $317.24 owed to them. However she "lost" 471 of the items respectively costing $1. She doesn't feel she wants to repay $471 which could've been sold by our students have the items not been lost by her. Is this embezzlement/larceny? My business is incorporated. She pocketed 1262 of the profit she have since paid wager on 473.76.
Parents adore her but don't know what she did.I am a little sceptical to file charges. We live surrounded by a small town where everyone grew up together. Bad society (that steal per se) have a road of weasling their way into the heart of the public with their "sob" stories. She if truth be told lost her other job around the time she started collecting money for our fundraiser. I merely have a awareness that I will end up looking close to the bad guy if I profile charges...oh... which could really damage by sports business since the students / parents choose to attend my facility. She be the teacher for most adjectives my classes and the kids / parents adored her... so did I (before this happened) and now the fundraiser company is threatening to sue my business if we don't compensate all the debt she racked up (without my consent or knowledge).
Answers: Do small claims court to seize your money back. You MUST sue her for this... You cannot permit her get away near it, no matter how small of a town you live contained by.

Since you already collected some of the money from her, you may not be able to press criminal charges... Have your time in court... bring adjectives your documents... even if you lose, you can't let her take away with it.
Contact the District Attorney and review the situation. Let the DA desire whether charges should be filed. If they enunciate yes and need a complainant, sign the charges.

Could photographers get sued for working beside underage models?

I was wondering if a photographer who is taking photographs can get sued by someone other after the persons parents? If the pictures arent at adjectives explicit is there anyway that they could attain introuble? The parents know they are modeling so they have no problem lately the kid is under 18
Answers: No.if it isn't child pornography and you aren't making them do anything they don't want it's fine.
Sued for what?

A lawsuit is a civil dispute over money between two individuals. For someone to succesfully sue a photographer, they'd have need of to show that the photographer did something that financially harmed them.

Now, if the photographer takes photos of a minor which are forbidden (even WITH parental permission) then he could be *criminally* charged beside manufacture of child pornography, but I can't reckon of any way that even that could bestow rise to a *lawsuit*.

To the poster below who mentioned nudity.. bareness alone does not make photos of minors unfair, nor does the lack of bareness mean that they're NOT improper.

Let's say that a photographer take photographs of nude kids playing at a nudist resort to be published in the resorts newsletter. Just because the kids are nude doesn't imply those pictures are illegal, or every nudist club contained by the country would have it's magazine shut down.

Now, then again, if he takes pictures of 12 year antiquated girls posing provocatively in sexy lingerie, those pictures probably ARE unfair, even though there's NO nudity, because of the "prurient intent" near which they were made. If indistinguishable pictures, though, were taken to illustrate a sale catalog, they're likely permitted.

It's NOT a simple subject, and there's no "bright line" test.

Richard
If the photographer is working next to models under the age of 18 and does not own a release signed by a parent, guardian or legal agent, he WANTS to be within trouble. He can not use the pictures without the release, so I would assume anyone trying to sue him would not hold much of a case.

Anyone can bring a suit against anyone else at any time for any foundation. This does not mean it will ever gain to the point of a hearing, but the suit can still be file. So can a counter-suit against a frivolous suit.
The photographer should have an fully developed member of the in front of sex present at all times, even though the photos are not explicite. I see no drive why the photographer would get into any big-hearted of trouble. He would have to enjoy the parents' permission.

Contractor did shoddy job and get performance bonus and applaud. How do they keep getting away near it

They had a contract to update adjectives signage along a High voltage power transmission dash. They finished early because they didnt touch signs up glorious and got the bonus. This type of article seems to begin again and again. A simple inspection of the finished job by a knowledgable individual would have prevented this - why do ppl hang on to falling for this type of trick?
Answers: That is the object of the contractors, and those who contract near them, get the commission done, get the profession done ahead of schedule, and gain the job done underneath budget.

And to hell with the consequences.

Why do all high-stakes criminals hold Swiss bank accounts?

Answers: They don't. Stop watching so much TV.
They don't.

A lot of the treatment of "Swiss guard accounts" in the medium is pure fiction.

Switzerland is one of the few countries in the world that let you open a hill account near only a number attached to it, not a christen, so they are popular with nation who want to hide money.

BUT. the Swiss bank WILL answer legal court subpoena's from foreign courts IF nearby is evidence that shows the money in the sketch is illegally obtain, contrary to what you often see within the movies.

Richard
Are you saying most American politicians own Swiss bank accounts? Can you prove it? Do you know "all" the high-stakes criminals one-sidedly? You must: you are claiming to know some really personal, usually well clandestine, information regarding "all" the high-stakes criminals!

You are any full of it, and I believe that to be the case, or you are going to stipulation a really good place of escape.
Switzerland is a neutral country. Therefore relatives in powerful nonetheless dubious political positions who have made a business out of financially destroying those who threaten their 'world order', or religiously base power position, cannot access these funds by filing political lawsuits against 'high-stakes criminals'.

More Questions and Answers:
[2164] - [1035] - [695] - [500] - [1442] - [1647] - [1653] - [569] - [1005] - [98] - [1003] - [1052] - [442] - [141] - [403] - [1980] - [619] - [2026] - [2223] - [1440]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: