Law Questions and Answers

What documents are required to get married surrounded by sharia court dubai. both are moslems.?

Answers: Marriage certificate issued & authenticated by authorities of your country, cross checked and again authenticated by the embassy (of your country) at UAE, consequently the ministry of foreign affairs of UAE stamped. BUT there are requirements of immigration for sponsoring the wife beneath husband sponsorship such as minimum salary of 4000 AED etc..
Remember, contained by addition, that if you're not originally from Dubai after you'll need to be sure that ALL your affairs contained by your home country are fully up-to-date before you go off.

Once you are married you will not under any circumstances be allowed to exit Dubai without your husbands formal written consent. In the event of his annihilation, you'd need the formal written consent of his closest surviving manly relative.

In addition, Dubai does not make out the authority of US courts in child custody cases, and Dubai courts will ALWAYS award custody to the father within the event of a divorce, or to his relatives if he dies.

Richard

Does anyone know a site that has the imperative library books online??

Not just the name of the books, but the actual page online?
Like the 9th decennial digest, Court Reporters, etc.??
Thanks all!!
Answers: Westlaw and Hein Online hold such things.

The subscriptions are quite expensive though.

I don't mull over there is any place free because those books are copyrighted by their publishers.

Some imperative libraries do have free access to Westlaw and Hein Online.
Good Luck...I am not sure if in attendance is any at all! I took a paralegal class and the solitary way I be able to get hold of to any law books or anything be to have a code from my professor to use to take into them online. The code was individual good the time I be in college.
If I think of anything I will tolerate you know!
Lexis-Nexis.

It's expensive, though.

Richard
LexisNexis and Westlaw both have practically everything you could want within this respect. Both also cost an arm, a leg, and the rights to any future spare arms or legs you might come into possession of within the future.

How can i get detailed information roughly speaking a criminal case to be exact about 10 years mature?

Answers: OK, here is what you do. Whether or not the person be found guilty, the records are public and you can look at them, at tiniest in every state I am aware of (public even-handedness in a democracy, and all).

You will involve to know where the criminal skin was tried. For example, if the crime occur in Podunk, WA, you would jump to the Pudunk District Courthouse, and tell them that you want to see the docket of an elderly case. They will dispense you a book with an alphabetical inventory of defendents for each year. If you don't know exactly what year the charges be filed surrounded by, you may have to look contained by two or three books until you find it. The book will give you the case's docket number (file number).

Give the docket number to the court clerk, who will afterwards have to verbs the case directory from storage. With a case that ancient, it is very possible that the record could be in insightful storage somewhere. You may have to come stern the next daylight to get the wallet.

The case record will contain every detail of the case you could ever want to know, name of all witnesses for and against the defendent, and (possibly) including transcripts of the nouns.

There will, of course, be a computer summary of the bag with such information as defendent's describe, and ultimate disposition, but it will not contain nearly as much information as the actual armour file itself.

Be advise that you will NOT be allowed to leave the clerk's department with the report, and they will often charge exorbitant prices for copies. So, bring a record pad.
Anything that is to say public record shouldn't be rock-hard to get hold of, but if it is not, you can't. I have a sneaking suspicion that if the person be arrested, then you can catch the arrest record, and if they be convicted then you can bring back that information. But, if they weren't convicted, I am not sure that you can get the information at adjectives. It is different in different states.You should be capable of get it from your county or state court system if you apply but it may cost you for copies. I am not sure something like that either.
Sharon
Contact the criminal clerk where on earth the case be tried. It may take a few days for them to research a luggage this old, but it is still public account unless it involves a minor. There will be a small charge for the information from the clerks office.

SELF DEFENCE (LAWYERS/LAW STUDENTS only)?

If someone is attacking a friend of yours, you jump contained by and hit the person to stop them from inflicting further defacement, would this be a valid defence of self armour should you be sued by the party you hit - ie. seeking damages.
Answers: Even surrounded by circumstances where the accuse has a safeguard of self defence to a criminal charge, he may still be held liable surrounded by the tort of negligence in respect of matching act (Revill v Newbery - [1996] 2 WLR 239).

Thus, where on earth an occupier of premises comes across a burglar on his land he cannot work with total disregard to the burglar's safekeeping, any more than one could attack an attacker, and the maxim ex turpi causa non oritur actio (no doings will arise from a bad cause) cannot be invoked to provide the occupier or well brought-up samaritan with what would amount to a complete guard to the burglars/attackers claim for damages. However, even though such a complete defence may not be available, the courts are plausible to reduce the amount of the claimant's award on the ground of contributory negligence. Trespass against the party is another possibility.

The law within the UK and the US are quite similar.

U.S. law governing self-protection derive from the ancient English common decree that held that a medieval Briton was in somebody`s debt to retreat until his back be literally to a wall or a ditch before he be justified within fighting bad an assailant. This so-called "retreat law" has be substantially modified in American courts, which enjoy generally ruled that though a character must attempt to avoid trouble, he is not legally bound to flee if such exploit would increase his peril. Only Texas law ignore retreat altogether and permits an attacked personage to stand and fight it out below any circumstances.

In the US and UK, once the fighting have begun, the statute becomes a event of interpretation. An attacked person is rightfully permitted to exert only as much force as is prerequisite to repel the aggressor. The word 'self' in self-defence is to some extent misleading because any person have a common tenet right (some might say an obligation) to prevent crime, whether that be to stop an assault, or otherwise.
If a 3rd bash witness is present and willing to testify to it afterwards they don't have much of a grip. Otherwise if it is just between the three of you after he could lie and claim for damages.

If you run for a jury trial then it depends on how you and your advocate will present the case and the jury picked. If you hold a biased jury then you're out of luck or might procure lucky if they believed you.
You leave out too much central information.
Are all party adults? Is any form of deadly weapon used surrounded by the assault on your friend? Is your friend a person (woman or a smaller creature or elderly) subject to serious bodily harm? Would a plausible person consider you hitting the attacker a practical defense chance or could it be construed as excessive action; more than vital regarding the situation and participant?

Assuming the attacking party is an competent bodied male grown, a defensive endeavour to assist a person within need of your assistance would fetch much weight, if sued by the criminal. Assault is a crime, as a consequence, you are simply trying to prevent (stop) a crime in progress. In absolute countries, you can subdue a criminal, if necessary to act a citizen's arrest, until authorities can be contacted and arrive at the scene.

Also, you would want to try to get appropriate information from well brought-up witness, if available and willing to testify, and, if basic, a good attorney.
It wouldn't be "self" safety. It would be a valid defence single if the amount of force you used was proportionate to the horizontal of threat (you said "attacking", which is very vague). If the force you used be excessive, you could be sued.

United States crime rate compared to other countries?

What is the most recent crime rate of the United states compared to other countries, especially England
Answers: Don't know about England, but at tiniest we don't blow ourselves up and take hundreds and/or thousands of lives while committing suicide.
To look the U.S. notes up, check out the latest annual report from the FBI.

http://www.fbi.gov/pressrel/pressrel07/c...

I don't know give or take a few other countries, but as one of many Commonwealth countries whose affairs of state was modeled on the U.K.'s structure, you would probably know better than I where on earth to start. (I'm a Yank.)
The best place for crime rates in the US is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_th...

For murder rates compared to other countries, see http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/cri_mu...

The background shows that the murder rate in the US is roughly 3 times difficult than in the UK.

How do Canadian Common-law laws work? Long one but really upset :(?

Well..I arranged to build a house. Once the lot was bought and vault was individual dug I hooked up with this guy and we get an apartment together. We lived together for 4 months and then my house be done. He lived in the house for 2 months past I got rid of him So he moved out up to that time I ever made my first mortgage payment. Hes be gone since last June and I get a letter from his advocate on Thur. saying hes taking me for partly my equity. Ok so my question is...
I work for a lumber courtyard and my boss finances contractors. I paid $220 for my house and it appraised at $360 due to deal and favors from contractors plus my employee discount on adjectives the lumber, plumbing and finishing. So I have alot of money on the stripe more than I can cough up to get rid of him. My biggest problem is that the legal representative I used (friend of the family) put his name on my territory title??????? So I hired a new attorney who wants to sue the infirm lawyer..Is that even going to assistance? his names still going to be on the title.
Answers: In almost adjectives provinces in Canada within is minimum residency of 3 years together before a league can be considered Common-Law (2 years in Alberta and Nova Scotia). He should hold a case. Also at lowest possible in Ontario, division of property is excluded from the Family Law Act surrounded by regards to Common Law Marriages.
Common decree

All provinces and territories in Canada, excluding Quebec, follow the common canon legal tradition. Equally, courts hold power under the adjectives Judicature Acts to apply equity.

As with adjectives common directive countries, English-Canadian law follows the system of stare decisis. All courts must follow the decision of the more senior courts. The inferior and superior courts of the provinces are not bound by the courts of any other provinces. However, their decisions are treated as a persuasive source of imperative and are often followed as if binding; singular the Supreme Court of Canada has authority to bind adjectives courts in the country beside a single ruling. The busier courts, such as Ontario Court of Appeal, for example, are often looked to for guidance on masses local matters of directive outside the province, especially in matter such as evidence and criminal law.

When here is little or no existing Canadian decision on a unique legal issue and it become necessary to look to a non-Canadian officially recognized authority, English court decisions, especially those of England's Court of Appeal and the House of Lords, are almost other used. The exception comes for questions involving unquestionable legal field such as constitutional law and privacy decree where United States court decision are more favoured because historic American law lords were the permitted pioneers of these specialized areas where England's judiciary have made little or no comment. Decisions from other Commonwealth nations are also treated as persuasive sources of directive, as well as decision from the United States.

Due to Canada’s historical connection next to the United Kingdom, decisions of the House of Lords in the past 1867 are still binding on Canada unless they have be overturned by the Supreme Court of Canada. Equally, Canada is still bound by the decisions of the Privy Council in the past the abolishment of appeals in 1949. Nonetheless, decision from both of these bodies, even after sovereignty, are still held in soaring esteem and are considered very persuasive by the courts.
" Try All Of These And Take Your Pick Click the Link "
http://www.google.com/search?q=Canadian+...
Hope This Really Helps...
need I could help you.
its worthy you got rid of that convulse. I don't see how his lawyer is even pursuing it.
follow through near you new attorney and see what develops.
I feel for you.
angelic luck

International waters questions?

What law are there within international waters? I though that there be none, but what keeps ethnic group from taking someone out to sea and bloodshed them? So there have to be some basic directive out there that adjectives or most countries agree on.

And what about cruise ships? They tour into international waters, don't they? Are they like little bits of the country of cause or something, or do they have their own law?

Any answers would help.
Answers: Technically a ship contained by international waters is still under the jurisdiction of the country surrounded by which it is registered. Your 'little bits of the country of origin' line is not far from accurate.

As for 'what keep people from taking someone out to deep-sea and killing them?' Many jurisdiction will punish a crime if ANY element of the crime is committed surrounded by the jurisdiction. In the case you describe, the jurisdiction the took the entity FROM would argue they have jurisdiction.

There are also straightforward 'laws' agreed to by most countries. Technically, 'International Law' is an oxymoron, but is everyone agrees, it may as well be statute.

My jewler chipped my diamond!?

By mistake when I took my diamond into be serviced, I noticed the subsequent morning it was foggy. I took it put money on to the jeweler to show him and he noticed it too. He be not the one who serviced the ring, but one of his workers. He took his loop and studied the diamond, which he knew moderately well from previous work done on my ring, and notice that the corner of my 2 carat trillion had be chipped. He said he would make it supreme again, but I wouldnt have it for the holidays. He call me today and said the diamond could not be repaired back to its glory and that I needed to come contained by and sit down with him to settled what we need to do. What should i expect from him? I didnt buy the diamond from him, only the setting. I do have insurance on the diamond, should I contact my insurance agent? What in the region of the sentimental value of my productive diamond, doesnt that count? Help please!
p.s.
this is a high shutting one owner store.
Answers: that is tricky, i would contact my insurance because once a diamond is chipped near is nothing you can do, i dont know what he required to do with your diamond over the holiday because adjectives he could do would be fill it, and that will diminish the significance just as much as the chip. if you didnt purchase the diamond from him and he be just cleaning it consequently he isnt liable, but if they were doing work on the ring next im sorry to say they are liable and much replace your diamond.
how the hell do you chip a diamond
they are one of the hardest stones on soil
I am truely surprised that a high trait diamond could have be chipped in servicing. What did you enjoy done?

I don't believe that you can insure for sentimental value. If your insurance agent can settle this amicably, you should adopt the deal.
If we assume that the chip be not the result of any special act of negligence on the module of the jewler, it is unlikely that you could recover the full replacement appeal of the diamond through a law suit. This is because near is always a small risk when submitting jewelry for service, even by an expert, which the customer accept. (Although this may not be a safe assumption -- diamonds are pretty darn hard).

Your insurance company is indeed the first phone call to receive. The jewler will almost certainly hold insurance of his own. Your insurance company will speak to his insurance company, and a settlement will be reached.

Your diamond is single insured for actual value. Therefore, what will most credible happen is that the destabilized stone will be appraised by a neutral appraiser which both insurance companies can agree on. This appraisal will be compared near the original appraised significance of the diamond, and you will be compensated for the difference.

The legal world doesn't caution about sentimental expediency, unfortunately. If the jeweler *was* forgetful and you could prove it (which is a long shot), and you have sustained matter damages above and beyond the amount covered by insurance (remounting costs, etc.), then you might be capable of recover these from the jeweler as okay.

P.S. Regarding spreading stories about the jeweller. I insist on you strongly not to do this. The other poster is absolutely correct: Such detrimental stories could indeed destroy their business. The jeweller may help yourself to such a threat very seriously, and so does the canon. If you publish or otherwise intentionally and maliciously distribute information to the effect of the jeweller anyone incompetent, knowing that the effect of these stories is to destroy, diminish, or otherwise interfere near the ability of the jeweller to do business, the jeweller can sue you for: (1) slander and (2) tortious interference near business relationships.

Once you have be hauled into court on these complaints, you will be forced to prove the exact accuracy of respectively and every statement you have made. This may nouns simple, but if the plaintiff is mad at you, they can drag it out until it costs you far more than $17,000, and to be precise providing that you *win.*

Second, you may or may not be entitled to the replacement value of the stone. It really does depend on why the stone cracked, and what the jeweller did to cause it crack.
This is a tough call. You do call for to go and sit down next to him, with your resourceful appraisal, and make a conclusion as to what to do. Most likely, the stone will enjoy to be replaced through your insurance policy. Please understand, he is not offering to repair or replace your stone because of the chip - trillions chip extremely effortlessly, and there is no opening to prove that the chip happened while surrounded by his shop - you could very well have knock your hand against a wall, or bumped the ring into something, and chipped the farthest point yourself. He is looking at the "fogginess" of the stone - generally something see when the bench jeweler uses too high of a boil in the process of repairing your prong. Regardless, you will most promising be getting a new stone, after your insurance company have contacted the jeweler, gone over any appraisals, and makes a finding to how much it is worth to get it replaced.
As long as the jewelry store go along with the insurance replacement attraction, you have no permissible reprecussions at all - and if you be to try to spread nasty stories around the quality of their service, you could terribly easily be sued yourself. Play nice, and be glowing you're dealing with a respectable jeweler who is of a mind to help you replace your stone.

What age do you got to be to win your licence?

Answers: 16 in alabama and georgia
14 hardship
15 permit
16 license

within texas anyways
I think you own to be old plenty to spell it before you attain it. But usually 16.

LICENSE
16 in pa but i have an idea that they are soon changing it to 18
it depends on where on earth you live i think within lousiana you only enjoy to be 15 or something idk
I think it is at least possible 16 in every state, but adjectives the states have different law about when you can start drivers training.
it vary depending where you live i know this place surrounded by greece that you have to be at tiniest 23
it may vary depending on what state you live surrounded by, though the general age is 16 throughout the United States.
you enjoy to have you authorization for 1 year and a day you and procure it at age 15 the test is unproblematic and then you hold the permit for the year and daytime then at age 16 you and capture your licence

at 18 you do not need a warranty first
it depends what state you live in, age restrictions come and go depending on location

Is it illegal or immoral not to pay time and a partly on holidays?

I work at a hotel and I have have to work on Thanksgiving and Christmas this year for regular pay.
Answers: Under US ruling, employers are simply required to pay time and a partially when the number of hours worked in a week is more than 40. Ethically, I would argue nearby is no obligation to compensate time and a half EVER. Most companies I own worked for pay 'Holiday pay' for the holiday whether you work of not. They afterwards pay straight time for any hours in reality worked.
Some of us are/have gotten our butts kicked for no extra pay.

Be appreciative or walk.
do you attain holiday hours?

at our job, 9-1-1, we also own to work holidays, but we get 80 hours a year for 10 holidays (which is going on for standard) that I can take past its sell-by date during the year.

so in effect, I engineer double time for 8 hours those days
although I am only compensated single - - - -savvy?

I work the 8 and get 8 bad paid - double time!

hope this works for you

enjoy a great 2008
The question is, who is holding the gun to your commander to work there?

The bearing you state 'This year' makes make it seem similar to you were giving time and partly in the recent past. Business number one responsibility is to make money. Once they run a profit they can be noble, but they are not required to be. Perhaps they are not doing so well this year?

But you know what dude, you come a looking you can go a looking.

It sucks but I be once a night watchman making $ 3.35 an hour on Christmas while a tow motor driver slept surrounded by the warehouse pulling down $ 45.00 an hour.

The night watchman post got me through conservatory and I was competent to get a well brought-up job where on earth I did not have to work the holidays.

Best of luck to you.
Nope. That is a courtesy offered. There is no canon stating that time and a half have to be paid.

More Questions and Answers:
[924] - [858] - [1049] - [2270] - [2540] - [350] - [1615] - [991] - [613] - [2309] - [1147] - [2395] - [2531] - [653] - [1144] - [1919] - [1162] - [1767] - [851] - [1722]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: