Law Questions and Answers

Is it possible to get a Restraining Order on someone you don't hold an address for?

I dont really wanna go into the details but i stipulation to get a restraining charge on 2 people harassing me they live together I know what city but I don't know their home address and i hold no idea where on earth they work? Its a long very crazy story so i own to spare you the details. Please if you have something rude to articulate don't waste your time trying to answer my grill. The whole point of yahoo answers is to bring back advice an answers from others not to be judge. Thanks in finance for taking the time out to help.
Answers: Get a concealed fetch permit & a pistol. Take a class on the weekend.

It will set you spinal column about $550.00.

Is your go worth $550.00?

If someone means you mar, what exactly does a restraining order backing? Its like wearing invisible clothes.
gb-i should expect you can-its the person you want to restrain not where on earth they might live.
people do move around.
As long as you can properly identify the human being, I don't see why not. It would be harder to serve them with the writ without an address, and they can't be charged beside violating it until they are served. On the other appendage, you could carry a copy beside you and serve them personally if they come around.
As the answer recommend a concealed handgun permit implied, a Restraining Order can't stop someone from harassing you. It lone allows you to have them arrested if they do.

I saw Mariah Carey in a bikini and it made me lesbian, can I sue?

she is a foul temptress and ruined my energy
Answers: what?? is this a joke. A picture can't cause you a lesbian.
No you can not sue.
But I think Mariah Carey could get anyone lesbian or any gay guy straight
are you for real?
not a soul turns you lesbian you choose to be that
duh
yes you can sue--but the court might make you prove it lol
HAHAHAHAHHA
eww.

carry a life!
Wait. Hold on.

Let's try that again.

Delete this grill and ask what you REALLY were going to ask.
your pretty dumb if your gonna sue her because YOU looked at her and TURNED into a lesbian. thats your eccentricity.
do you know how stupid you would make yourself look?

inhabitants these dayss.
LMAO I was sense suicidal but you made my day.
I jerk off to mariah and bust a nut adjectives over my boxers can i sue?

Is it illegal for a dry cleaners to flog the owners clothes, if the owner did not show up to pick them up?

In other words, let's say you bring your clothes to the dry cleaners, and did not hold time or that you forgot to pick up your clothes from the dry cleaners. It has be a month, and the dry cleaners decides to market it. Is this illegal? Can they do such a item? Any sort of help would be appreciated. Thank you surrounded by advance.
Answers: Every dry cleaner have a conditions of service posted or on your reciept. They state specifically how long you have to pick up, when they consider cloting abandondened and when and what happen then.

Legal? As long as you permitted the conditions with the reciept.
No, it is not criminal if they follow the rules.
There are local laws governing this situation which allow the shopkeeper to market your clothes with perceive after a while if you don't pay.
Usually the tally has the rules printed on it.
The importance of used clothes is so low that most cleaners don't bother selling, they donate.
check if it tells you on the ticket.i reflect on its similar to a pawn brockers.cos where on earth would they put all the cloths that are uncollected contained by a year.
i reckon its 3 months.
MOST drycleaners have a sign STATING that if the clothes is not picked up inwardly 30 days they will do whatever they want beside it. The sell it to label up for the cost they incurred cleaning it. You should pay more attention to these things.
If you fetch your car to a shop and enjoy work done and do not pay they can get rid of it to recover their loss - better than ratification that on to other customers.
It should be illegal

My brother is a wrongfully accused sex wrongdoer?

My 19yr old bro ws just now convicted of having sex next to a 14yr old girl. The truth is that the girl be wanting my brother and she was the one person physical with him. She told him he be 18 and she looks it. Then this girl, after being the dominant one surrounded by the back of the vehicle with my brother, their friends surrounded by front, runs and tells her dad my brother raped her. Then that girls dad hit my brother over the pay for of the head for it, my bro be unconcious for like 5days. And the dad get no jail time and in a minute my bro will have to be on the sex guilty party list for a really long time and I be just wondering if within was anything he could do, cuz its basically like they pinch this messed up in the organizer girls side. But she just needed to get my bro contained by trouble. And she lied about everything but cuz he's a dude they believe her? I dont gain it and I am so angry cuz there are some fucked up ppl out at hand and idk how my bro can get equality and get this girl contained by trouble for lying about it adjectives.
Answers: unfortunately your brother can do zilch about these charges...it's miserable but that is the agency it is. I personally know 3 other men beside the same problem.He will never be allowed to own a job that deal with kids, or hold any really decent charge either. He will hold to stay inside the house during the holidays and Halloween he cannot come out of the house to even give out candy. (that is if you own been to court already) If he is one of the lucky ones who contained by court can prove that he didn't have sex near her then his duration will be OK...if not...and they did he will enjoy to live with it. Don't expect her to recant her story at this point. she doesn't want to obtain in trouble and it looks similar to she will get away next to it. I'd advise you at this point to gain involved with some of the law that are up for review involving sex offenders and clear more people aware that adjectives it takes right very soon is an accusation to label someones life a total hell. Laws obligation to be changed...this pointing a finger needs to be stopped and the REAL offender punished!!
a friend of mine was contained by a similar situation. she told him she was 17..she be only 15. bam! mother caught them contained by the act. mournfully, it doesn't matter what she "told" him. the certainty is, she's a minor under the age of 16 (or 18 contained by some states). my friend is still a "sex offender" 16 yrs later.

your brother requirements to pursue a case against the father for at lowest medical bills for beating him.
Man, I really don't enjoy an answer for that. Just hope your brother has a great advocate.

My cousin was accuse of rape by this fugly girl at a party he go too. She was "contained by love" with him, but he already have a great girlfriend. he was thrown contained by jail lacking a second glance. after a few months he go to court, and his lawyer have many of the folks who know both of them contest to her character, it turned out most of the populace that knew them know she was psychotic and a fraud. Therefore her accusation be doubt full.

I hope that helps

Where do I find recorded wills?

My dad passed away and I know he have a will, but I don't know if it was record. Where do I look online? What office would I contact?
Answers: Very little is online; run to the probate office of the local courthouse surrounded by the county he lived or owned property in. Copy should be nearly .50 a page
The place to check would be with the probate clerk contained by the county you live in. If you can not find it you will necessitate to start working backwards to every place he lived one state and county at the time. Most phone for the clerks can be located online.

Im in pfd our resolution is give or take a few civil disobedience as a weapon in aggression for justice.are nearby any neg pts

From what i can see already there are alot of devout affirmation points,but i honestly cant seem to find any negation points for this topic.
Answers: I could be wrong,but if you are asking abt the concept as adjectives in present times. In that defence.
Civil disobedience only works if it is done by a immense group of people. For it to work it have to inconvenience a lot of the family who are being undeserved.. If it is only a minority group consequently it might not work. In this age of technology where lot of work is automated the concept is not a adjectives one.
Moreover what if you were up against a tyrant?
Example -Myanmar. a diplomatic protest was broken up by use of ruthless force.


If it be abt the past use of the concept by leaders similar to M.K.Gandhi, MLK, Henry david thoreau, then read history and you will see a great deal of conflicting points.

How much time would someone get within jail...?

How much time would someone carry in secure unit for having a gun near no license? Thanks for answering and God bless!
Answers: My boyfriend got 2 - 10 years. For have a gun with no charter in WV. But he get released and put on probation. He is done with probation contained by May. I'm so excited!!!
too vague. Where do you live? Were you carryiing concealed beside out a permit or owning a gun at home next to no paperwork?

Call the DA and ask; or the sheriff.
depends on a lot of factor, a few being.
-any priors?
-where you live
-any felony?
-was the gun obtained legitimately?
-was the gun used in a ferocious crime?
-was it concealed on person?

best approach to find out what the possible sentence would be is to contact a lawyer or prosecutors bureau.

If the police knocked at your door and said they where on earth investigating suspicious activity and asked to come surrounded by?

just to hold a look around and make sure everything is ok...would you consent to them in?
(no..did this did not occur to me, but if it happened to you, out of the blue, you are watching TV and minding your own business and the door bell rings...)
Answers: I enjoy no problem with it as long as they enjoy a warrant signed by a judge, I enjoy nothing to darken. With all of these home invasions going on, you can narrowly trust anybody. The warrant at least will reassure you that they are legitimate cops.
lol

I would tell them to bring a warrant. This isn't Nazi Germany.

I'm waiting for some "If you hold nothing to stow, let them within." comments. Whoever says such a article belongs in communal living situation where on earth no property is private. Let the government set up a microphone and camera surrounded by your home if you have nil to hide.

The 4th Amendment surrounded by the Bill of Rights
"The right of the people to be out of harm`s way in their those, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizure, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and in particular describing the place to be searched, and the people or things to be seized."

Anyone who let police surrounded by without warrant, deserves NO freedom OR privacy. PERIOD. You hold allowed your servant, which you hire, to become your master.
Nope. I would state that I have be home watching TV for some time and have noted nil suspicious. I would offer them any help out or insight that I could with respect to neighbors or goings on surrounded by the neighborhood but I would not allow them in my premises short a warrant.which is my right.

This is actually a tactic commonly used by police officers to assess a home or situation while any investigating or preparing to perform a attack.

Happened to me...I had nought to hide but turns out a room-mate did.

EDIT TO NY TRAIN: While you breed a good point, the questioner have posed the situation where they are ASKING to be agree to in. They ask, I utter no. At that point if they still wish to enter, next they can use the probably cause.
All the wanna be court scholars on here have need of to educate themselves on the directive.Like everyhting else, without probable make happen, no they can not. If they have probable impose, and can explain it at future court hearing, then yes they can. A "warrant" is needed deeply infrequently and usually during a ongoing criminal investigation. Your average uniformed cop not only won't enjoy a warrant, but often does not want one. It all comes down to probable motivation.
Probable cause could be the smell of pot, somebody hurt, underage general public drinking, someone yelling for sustain, or any other violation of the canon.
Bottom line, if they REALLY want to come surrounded by, they will. They will find probable cause, afterwards your lawyer will hold to argue it in court, if charges arise.

For the history, though, cops don't come to your home "out of the blue" There is usually a reason. We don't only just drive around going..."oh, lets turn knock on that door".
If a cops at your door, he has a source and odds are he isn't disappearing until whatever brought him in attendance is resolved to HIS satisfaction.

BTW..cops do not own to show you the warrant, so asking to see a warrant is useless. The fact they are doing what they are doing way they have a warrant. Your attorney will see it within court. people survey to much TV...LOL.
depends - if I am doing suspicious activity -NO
if I am not doing suspicious hum -YES
No I would not let them and it have happen to me. Cops get dispatch to wrong address they became impertinent and I told them to leave.With out a warrant they enjoy no authority to search or come into your home
Yes I would. I own nothing to stash. Especially as one who works in regulation enforcement I am more than willing to get thier jobs easier.
After seeing nearby Police ID (a badge is NOT ID) I would ask what type of 'suspicious activity' they be investigating and why they thought looking around MY home would be helpful. If they have probable cause OR a warrant, they would not be ASKING to look around.

I was cought nouns, but i don't know if i have a criminal copy?

I was 19 when i be cought shoplifting contained by Wal-mart. i was near a bunch of friends and i nly did it cause they be all doing it. Stupid i know! i've defentally widely read my lesson now. The cops be called and give us all a fine. we adjectives got a point from Wal-mart that we had to sign and it pretty much stated that we weren't allowed into another wal-mart within canada for 1 year. I've paid my frie that the cops give me, and i'm currently woring on the contract from wal-mart. I was never taken to the police station and i never go to court. Do i have a criminal text? If i wanted to walk out of the country do i need to folder for a pardon or something resembling that? My parents don;t know about this and the single ones that know are the ones that were within. I feel horrable for it and i've defentally well-educated my lesson. On applications do i need to articulate that yes i have a criminal diary or yes i have be conviced of a crime?
Answers: I don't practice in Canada, but it doesn't nouns like you ever be convicted of a crime. Even if you were, I don't know how that would prevent you from departure the country.

Good luck,
Dana (attorney in the U.S.)
If you never done it up to that time or never been convicted -
you should grasp just a deterrent
they wrote a ticket and you paid a fine-means you pleaded guilty--need to hold a search done on yourself-the court lately might have thrown that ticket surrounded by gabage and used the money-odds are though you have a journal
I am not familiar next to CA law but I am up to date with nouns issues (former LPM) if you Gav no been issued a awareness to appear or have not appeared contained by court then in attendance is no record. The issue be resolved Civilly. Now that being said Walmart have till statute of limitations runs out to file those charges. Its particularly unlikely they will has they enjoy nothing to gain by doing so. Do stay out of any Walmart as you can be arrested for trespassing and they could directory the shoplifting charges at that point as okay. If Wlamart is part of a retail database yoru term might be in at hand. However this database is not used on criminal setting checks
To have a criminal history you must have be convicted of something under the Criminal Code of Canada. This cannot own happened if you be never charged with appearing surrounded by court or appeared in court. The fine sounds a bit iffy, but my guess would be that it be a fine under some adjectives or municipal legislation which does not constitute a criminal record here. (Think Highway Traffic Act...you rate speeding tickets but you don't have a criminal record).

Go to your local police department and wages a 35 (or so) dollar fee and capture a copy of your record to be sure. (Bring at lowest possible 2 pieces of ID).
If you were fined, you salaried the fine, you have a history.

Whats up with tasers?

Taser manufacturer, suppliers and police routinely refer to tasers as "non-lethal force" (just one ex. http://www.taser.org/ ). On the other hand, citizens who own used a taser (one example to be found here: http://www.mymurrieta.com/serendipity/in... ) have be charged with assault next to a deadly weapon. I'm not sure how to explain the discrepancy. The U.N. have listed tasers as a form of torture and copious people hold been kill by tasers. So, are tasers deadly arms or simply non-lethal tools of law enforcement? Also, if they are (or may be) contained by fact stony then why isn't their use by canon enforcement regulated as strictly as firearms? I'm looking for real answers to these question and not an argument or an attitude. Law enforcement people please consent to me know and others please give me your evaluation too. Thanx

Also, you may follow this link for hint: http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/2018...
Answers: Statistically, tasers injure suspects only 2% of the time. Most of these injuries are due to falling. By comparison, warfare hands on next to an officer results in the suspect self injured 55% of the time, and with the rod, the suspect goes to the hospital 80% of the time. That may not be ideal, but a 98% sucess rate is much better than the alternatives.

As far as the teens being charged near a deadly weapon, this could be due to the certainty they tased the facial area. That is not qualified, nor is it done as a matter of practice by police. I can see where on earth this would complicate things. In addition, look at the intent. The police intent is to control. Their intent be to commit a felony robbery.

As far as the UN calling them torture, that could be correct, but again, it goes to intent. A toothpick could be a torture device if you shove it below a fingernail.

As far as them being fatal, I totally disagree. I have not see one autopsy where the taser be the only factor within the death. Most are drug overdose, some are heart problems, but adjectives have some other contributing factor.

Look at the Vancouver airport incident near the Polish man... did the taser stop his heart, or did the stress from his outburst stop his heart? If the taser was responsible, don't you dream up death would hold been on the spot? He died 10 hours later. He be extremely agitated, how much stress did that put on him?

Tens of thousands of officers hold been tased, and none of them died. If the taser be capable of loss, don't you think at lowest possible a few would be victim?
"Intent", may own a lot to do next to it. In the hands of trained statute enforcement, there intended use is to temporarily disable aggressive/combative individuals or regain control of a situation that have gone wrong without use of virulent force. They are not intended as deadly force, they are an alternative to it. In some of these situations, remarkably few, the individual may have be under the influence of a mind altering substance. How is one to know ?

In the cease, people really do not own a grasp of percentages here. I devise the question really is... Out of adjectives the situations where a taser have been deployed, how oodles lives have be saved by in attendance introduction. How many injuries enjoy been prevented by here use.
Trooper hit it on the head. The tazer, as a together, is safer for both the offender and the officer.

While I am sure a tazer have been overused by a imperative enforcement officer, as with a rod or gun, it is a vital factor of keeping officers and the public not detrimental.

I worked for Ford in the litigation department. We used to achieve people complaining adjectives the time that their airbag broke their nose or separated their shoulder. What we could never generate them understand be the amount of damage that would own been minus the bag. A separated shoulder could hold been a fractured skull or demise.

Ok, a few people hold died. How many directive enforcement officers enjoy been save from serious injury or death?

How heaps criminals have be hit with a taser, instead of the officer have to use his service weapon? Officers I know are trained to shoot to kill, not to wound.

You will never hold an item like this, contained by any groups hands, that will be used impeccably every time. I support law enforcement using them contained by reasonable circumstances to protect themselves and the public.
The occupancy for a taser used by law enforcement surrounded by California is "Less Lethal".

In California, tasers meet the allowed definition of a firearm, and are prosecuted the same as if the weapon be a handgun.

They meet the two criteria needed. The expel a projectile and that expulsion is done through explosive force.

More Questions and Answers:
[1108] - [1342] - [543] - [2426] - [1080] - [1401] - [968] - [2042] - [2529] - [1595] - [705] - [1125] - [1949] - [741] - [1726] - [2142] - [1634] - [274] - [1755] - [1840]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: