Law Questions and Answers

My husband is in prison contained by France. Can he be transfered to a prison here in England?If so, how?

Answers: No can do...know a friend who get 14 months in Marseille a few years ago. His partner tried via embassies and the management - the usual scherzo...'He's British, and he needs to be implicit to family'. The French said no, as he committed his crime (minor player of drugs gang) in the city - and as soon as he served it, the police took him straight to the airport, and to Birmingham he returned.
Well if he is contained by prison I take it he have done something wrong..In that sense I hope the answer is no & the french taxpayers pay for his up keep hold of.

In the UK we seem to look after other prisioners from other countries. You trade name your bed you ly in it
It is possible, but not other given, you need to speak to a Solicitor for guidance.

By the way the UK does allow prisoners to serve their sentences surrounded by other countries under undisputed circumstances.

Good luck and I hope you get to call in your husband in a UK prison soon.
Hope not, our prisons are overflowing beside scum so I dont see why we should adopt someone who was prosecuted contained by France under French ruling just so his kith and kin can see him

Can anyone tell me what these lawyer do?

Assaults Lawyer, Bankruptcy Lawyer, Compensation Lawyer, Defense Lawyer, Divorce Lawyer, Fraud Lawyer, Insurance Lawyer, Medical Malpractice Lawyer, Personal Injury Lawyer, Nursing Home Lawyer, Social Security Lawyer, Wrongful Death Lawyer, Tax Lawyer, International Lawyer, Criminal Lawyer, Securities Lawyer, Car Accident Lawyer, Malpractice Lawyer, Software Lawyer.
Answers: It's kind of self explanatory isn't it?
They provide seriously of revenue for the criminal and civil justice system personnel. I. E. judge, DA and other even-handedness employees. They suck funds from hardworking populace and their company's because without hiring an attorney is court suicide for the people involved in litigation. They provide a path for guilty and charged criminals to get a possible dismissal because of some silly error contained by policy. What else? How about they nurture on the greed that absorbs most of them.

Deposition guestion...Lawyers please or anyone that may know?

I received a letter from Joe Blow wanting me to contact HIM nearly a time to set up a disposition with HIS laywer. Joe Blow is out of state. Do I respond to Joe Blow? My thought be that Joe Blow must think I must of touch off the turnip truck yesterday.Wouldn't or shouldn't I receive the request from his attorney stating a date and time for the desposition or would I receive the request from the court? The court hasn't even said that there is a bag yet. They a moment ago wanted my response. This is concerning a civil business that Joe Blow has file against me for slander/libel which I must say is untrue.
Please facilitate. Thanks
Answers: You have no legally recognized obligation to respond. In certainty anything you voluntarily say to anybody can be used against you within preparing a law suit. Sounds resembling there isn't even a suit file yet. You should consult an attorney nearly how to handle any adjectives communications.


** Note: This is a general discussion of the subject event of your question and not lawful advice. Local law or your particular situation may tuning the general rules. For a specific answer to your sound out you should consult legal counsel next to whom you can discuss all the facts of your grip. **
Any notice for deposition must come from ambiguous counsel to your counsel. Then your attorney will get beside you and make sure the time and date are flawless for you; i.e., maybe you are have surgery that day and cant attend? They cannot merely compel you to show up not knowing if youre even going to be able to. (I have it in mind, the CAN compel you, but that is what a thought of deposition is for, to schedule an appropriate date and time to appear).

Theres more to scheduling a deposition than basically a couple people showing up. You stipulation to have a deposition location. You stipulation to have a court reporter. You want to have adjectives parties present. That scheme your lawyer, his attorney and both of you. Discovery has to enjoy taken place. Interrogatories must have be completed. Papers must have be filed next to the court and you had to enjoy been served next to papers - or there is no lawsuit.

And remember, for this guy to win his satchel against you, he has to be capable of prove that what you said against him is untrue AND that he was harmed within some tangible bearing by what you said.

If you called the guy a convulse, his friends could very capably say that he is not a shake, but you could also find enough society to say he is a go into spasm that he would have no casing.

Even if everyone agreed he was not a joggle except for you, he would still have to hold been harmed contained by some tangible instrument. You called him a push and because of this, people stopped going to his store to buy his widgets, because after adjectives, he is a jerk. Get it?

I hope you are not trying to represent yourself surrounded by this matter. "A man who represents himself within court has a fool for a client." Time to advocate up.

Hope this helps.
I Know contained by England,to take out a crust you needA)A suit
B)Money
C)Know -How
D)A Degree is a help.
Put your crust speak to them(and the court)and try and resolve it out of court if possible.
GET A LAWYER!!! You will necessitate one to represent you at the deposition, as it is never a good thought to go it alone.
Your attorney would be able to protest to an irrelevant line of probing or other unfair tactic and hang on to you calm during your nouns.
Joe Blow shouldn't be the one who determines the date of the deposition. All counsel, as well as adjectives lay participants, must mutually agree on the date and time. Lawyers are busy society and aren't likely to be available when "Mr. Blow" say HE is.
What a jerk.
Your State statute is determinant in this issue.
Since Joe Blow has an attorney, you shouldn't enjoy any contact with him. Just the atty. Refuse to address to Joe Blow. Make him pay his atty to call upon you.
You are right, as letter should come from Joe Blow's atty, but not the court.
I don't enjoy enough info to read out more.
do not respond to this letter Joe BLow is simply attemptong to get a responce from you hopeing that it will be a negitive responce so that Jo Blow will own more to go on. Again I repete do not reply to the communication IF Joe Blow had an attotrney the attorney would own contacted you.now nearby are Laywers that will cunsult you for free and give you their direction that would be your best bet also if you go to a librbry and explane to the librarien your concern they can help you look up what your option are that would be a start.good luck ok

Would It Still Be Considered Armed Robbery With An Unloaded Gun?

I was newly thinking about this. I be wondering if a criminal decides to rob a store near a weapon that is unloaded; relying on the suspicion of the clerk cooperating with a gun pointed at their frontage. Would that still be considered armed robbery if the weapon is not loaded?
Answers: Yes it would.
An unloaded handgun or a water pistol or even simulating a handgun is still armed robbery.
Yes

Loaded or not, the robbed is within fear of human being killed.

*If in that was a imperative saying adjectives stores have armed team, do you think robbers would rob stores knowing here is a high probability of a shootout?
Even mentioning a gun, or imply you have a gun would be armed robbery, you do not involve to display it.

Simply stating "Give me the money if you don't want to get shot" would be plenty for armed robbery.
Yes, because the person you are attempting to rob, doesn't know that the gun is unloaded, also purely the fact that you enjoy a gun makes it armed robbery. Lastly, your intent is to startle the person into thinking you are going to shoot them, so within addition to an armed robbery charge you can obverse possible charges related to carrying a firearm.

Additionally, even if you were to use a pellet/B.B. gun you would still be charged near the crime as though you used a real weapon. It's also a apt way to return with yourself shot, by someone with a loaded gun, who deosn't kniw yours isn't loaded.

Either style you slice its a bad hypothesis.
Yes, even if you just influence you have a gun, and doln't show one, it is considered armed
robbery.
yep
yes
yap
Is several states, you don't even need a weapon to be armed robbery. If you conduct yourself like you own a weapon, the law treats you as if you are armed. Besides, an unloaded gun IS a weapon. You can other beat someone over the leader with it.

Several states clarified the law after someone tried to get out a an armed robbery charge by using a toy gun.
yes it would its a crime any process.gun or no gun.

How much time would someone get contained by jail.?

How much time would someone get hold of in secure unit for having a gun near no license? It was my bf contained by Kansas.and it's like his first similar to offense. Someone ran contained by his house after stabbing someone else (my bf was not involved next to that), and the police saw his gun while getting the other person. He used something approaching idk what it's called exactly (iota or something), but they permit him out the next morning and he went to court. I havent hear from him since thursday when he went to court. Thank you for answering, and God Bless!
Answers: From what I've see; no jail-time, just probation.
An unregistered gun is a no-no...It's evil and also a felony..he can kiss his freedom good -bye for while, lead to he has like mad of explanning to do. Maybe he ends up with a Judge who have a good darkness in bed next to his wife, if not, see ya...fitting Luck to him.Very dim light at the running out of his tunnel...

How do you get your license rear legs in the state of tennessee for not paying child support ?

Answers: Get current.

Or progress to the DMV and ask for a provisional license to drive back and forth to work; adjectives you'll get.
foot your back support or at lowest make a conventional and realistic repayment agreement and calendar

or you can apply to the court for undue hardship...if you enjoy a valid reason, resembling a medial problem that makes it difficult for you to appropriate public transit or you drive for your job..but this is expensive and not guaranteed so you may as in good health just earnings the support.
Step 1. Pay the child support.
Step 2. Take the proof to the DMV and ask this question within person.
simple..you PAY what is owed...next the lien is removed, and your license is returned to "working order."

Would it be against the law if I surgically removed my husbands loud cords against his will?

I'm not saying I'm going to do this I'm newly wondering if there's any law against it.
And are within any links that gives suggestion on how to perform such a procedure?
Answers: to be precise so funny u must really hate how u r husband consultation lol
are you nuts?-
it's assalt with a fatal weapon
um. yeah.



that might be just a bit illegitimate.
try here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Rec...
do you have a medical license? save, it's against the law for you to do it yourself
Why still him down with surgery, freshly tell your husband to shut the hell up.
yeah it be similar to assault. or attempted murder
um...yeah.just for a while.
Your a crazy B**** Why would you even wonder?
hahahahaha
yes im pretty sure you'd end up within a mental institution
Anything that involves cutting the skin and tissue would be a problem. Against his will!!! EEEK!
As long as you are a licensed doctor and enjoy power of attorney, go for it. Better move to Brazil since he wakes up or he might remove something of yours. Get concealing!!
ummm. yea! you bear his right from able to speak ever again.
Umm yes end in first your not a surgeon .
I can see why you would, but it is illegal as capably as unethical. Reminds me of Hannibal.
Yes, as expected. It would be assault or worse. You'd do a long stint in penal complex.

Why don't you do him a favor and just give up him. He would be better off lacking you. Let him find someone who actually care for him.
Yes! you'd be practicing medicine short a licence.
That's against the law. Unless you're a doctor, and can prove that in that was something wrong beside them.
Hey, even if you did it, he'd still be able to speak by using an electrolarynx, and you'd go to prison for a VERY long time.
A total laryngectomy is at most minuscule a 5-hour operation and is performed by ENTs within their 5th (and last year) of residency, as resourcefully as attending surgeons. It is very risky because at hand are so many blood vessel in the collar.
You'd probably get arrested for murder.
yeah it is
it is a cruel and unusual punishment, unless the supreme court Say's so.
Have you tried the biddable old piss surrounded by a spray bottle? Once he opens his mouth, spray it contained by! ^_^

Works on dogs and cats.. why not humans?
Leave.
He wont change.

What did Steve Emerson determine was the most threatening claim of muslims?

Steve Emerson, is the Executive Director of the Investigative Project on Terrorism. He proclaimed that Muslims enjoy made a threatening claim that disturbed him. What do you think it be?
Answers: I don't know but I'd believe him, whatever it is.

There's not a soul in the United States of America that know more about Islamo-terrorism than him. His book, American Jihad be eye-opening for me.
I remember a group of Christian missionaries in Afghanistan several years ago mortal tortured there, the primary religion anyone Islam. I also remember previous bible studies about bible prophecy which pointed to the citizens of the world (one-world government) anyone forced to worship some type of god and that if Christians did not renounce their faith, could be threatened beside beheading. Beheading seems to be the popular course of killing Christians surrounded by muslim countries. I'm not suggesting that all muslims believe this course, but maybe the extremists do. This is the process I see it.

Previous employer, Texas Department of Aging and Disability Services, Open Records Attny. issued HIPPA info.?

My previous employer was the Texas Department of Aging and Disability Services. They issued HIPPA information VIA an Open Records request. Is this improper? What, if any, is my legal explanation of action?
Answers: What exactly did they release? The HIPAA ruling prevents certain information. from human being released. There is a federal office that handle hipaa complaints.

OK, they most likely violated HIPAA. Your make happen of action here is a contravention of the HIPAA law. I believe that the one and only remedy is to file a complaint next to the Office of Civil Rights.

When are medical and personnel records confidential?

employer's dr is asking for copies of long-gone medical records and copy of personnel record in direct to determine fitness to return to work for this illness. is this allowed?
Answers: If they require the information as a medical professional in proclaim to clear return to work of course it is.
ALL medical archives are private and confidential and cannot legally be shared beside anyone that you do not specify can see them.

Your doctor cannot legally turn over any paperwork to your employer that you do not allow him to.

Your doctor can sign a waiver that will allow you to return to work and what kind of duty you should be put on, and for how long your duty should be restricted. Anything else is not appropriate for your employer to ask, and your doctor cannot volunteer information short your WRITTEN permission.

More Questions and Answers:
[1879] - [1881] - [993] - [282] - [415] - [394] - [2412] - [1265] - [477] - [1122] - [334] - [491] - [1764] - [2474] - [1765] - [1196] - [1014] - [186] - [114] - [2414]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: