Law Questions and Answers

I need to know the imperative on getting married in florida and mortal underage.?

I live in GA, would i enjoy to live in Florida to get hold of married? I am under 18 years of age. Do you requirement to be pregnant and 16 years of age? Or you can be 15? How much money does it cost? Do i need a blood exam? PLEASE, i need to know the answers as soon as possible..also once your married, who become your lega guardian, yourself right? thank you again.
Answers: i dont think that u enjoy to be prego to get married, but i enjoy heard of that one in the past, u might want to take other routes to win away from a bad situation, and im sorry for the awful comments i decision you the best of luck!
If you need out of a doomed to failure situation, you don't necessarily have to get hold of married. You could get emancipated...which is kinda close to a divorce...but between you and your parents. To be emancipated you must prove to a court that it is for your best intrest that you live without your parents.

You don't necessitate a blood test contained by Georgia to get married, but you do hold to be 16 and your parents must consent (unless your emancipated or pregnant). It cost $30 for a marriage license. All is like in florida except its more expensive...similar to $90.

This makes him GUILTY or newly plain stupid?

http://www.miamiherald.com/889/story/360...

Does anybody really think someone bar Musharaff had anything to do beside BHUTTO'S death????
Answers: It's a mess. I don't know why the U.S. have believed all the lies Musharraf have told them. Musharraf makes deal with everyone to stay surrounded by power, he is friend to no one. That is one aim the U.S. and Taliban play hide and dance seek while trying to execute each other for years on fall. Tis ridiculous!!! RIP Bhutto.
Exactly why do you think President Musharraf have anything to do with the assassination? What would be his object?

Muslims, other than Pres. Musharraf, would pick up more of their political goals but cause this death. Many within Pakistan do not like literary women?

Pakistan has more or less 165 million people beside a 63% literacy rate for males and 36% for females. Many did not like Bhutto.

As for your story: What political affairs would allow the investigation of a murder to be done by outside groups? Groups with a clear political agenda. Is not a function of federal government to investigate and enforce laws against its culture?

Riddle this, if the President of a centralized nation state with a trained military and nuclear military capability would not find a more subtile way to discredit a political rival, why hasn't the Army removed him? What does the disappearance of Ms Bhutto gain Pres. Musharaff? What does her death gain for the other faction in Pakistan who are suppressed by the current political affairs?

In Real Politics -- one does not make martyr for political gain.

Why when applying for a job?

do you enjoy to put your race down,,who care what color you are,if you score a giant mark to qualify you should be the human being for the job, is in that not laws that prevent that
Answers: It's mostly for statistical purposes.
You can decline to state your see.
I've seen it on applications, but at hand is a disclaimer stating it is for statistical purposes only, and will not be considered.

I see it on college applications too.
These are taken for statistical purposes contained by some cases.

In addition, some companies actively practice impartial hiring and seek to fufil quotas of minorities, women and the disabled.

I am pretty sure somewhere on that form it say that you do not have to answer.
They're "optional" question..with any answers given to be used for statistical purposes. Just sign the bottom of the dissertation but leave adjectives the questions/check boxes blank. This is to prove that you were at smallest shown the paper, but chose to not share.

Officer changed date on traffic ticket and never notified my son up to that time submitting it...?

My son was issued a traffic ruin for hitting a mailbox, the officer gave him the ticket next to "call inside 20 days" written in the court date division. He called the court 10 days then and was told he would be notify by the court as to his date, the officer should've known better than to write down this message. Having hear nothing from the court, I call myself after Christmas and found out the officer had changed his ticket copy to emulate a court date of 12/11/07 before turning it contained by. The secretary of state's office sent my son a dispatch saying his license is beneath probation because he did not contest his citation--presumed guilty plus a bench warrant was issued and fines assessed for not showing up. We right away went to the courthouse beside the original ticket, which be photocopied and the warrant and fines removed (so they say). Can this be grounds for dismissal? What happens to his driving journal since his court date is not until April 3. Please help if you can!
Answers: File an public servant complaint.
Not grounds for dismissal. If your son repairs the mail box and make peace with the owner, retains receipts for property person repaired, etc, the clerk will probably let the fine shift. He will remember your son if he does it again in a short amount of time.

The ticket human being 'fixed' should be brought up with the officer's superiors at the police station. If it happen to enough individuals he will be re assigned/disciplined. If they keep him on the pulsation, your son will get a ticket for spitting out the windowpane.
good luck
the cop falsified a report,i.e. a crime itself,get a advocate,,and you will be happy surrounded by the end i hope

Filing for Disability?

The common response in the order of filing for disability is that you will most probable be disqualified and have to hire an attorney. Pending on the attorney, you might stand a better karma. Who pays for the legal fees? If I am file, chances are I own not been competent to perform super paying job for awhile.
Answers: I applied and was approved on the first try within less than 90 days short an attorney. If you end up beside an attorney, their fees come out of your reward. SSA has it cap at 25% of retro pay beside a limit of $4000.

If you enjoy a condition that is tabled in the "bluebook" and you group all of the specifications, afterwards you're approved. Here's the link http://www.ssa.gov/disability/profession...

If you don't come across a listing you own to prove how your symptoms keep you from working and compassionate for yourself. You'll meet next to someone from Voc Rehab to determine if you could do other work if SSA feels they requirement that information.

There are 2 programs, SSDI and SSI. SSDI requires work credits (usually 40) and the payment is base on your work history. You can have other income (like a spouse) and it is not effect.

SSI is a welfare program for people lacking enough credits and is cap at 623 a month at the moment. There are income and asset restrictions, including a spouse's income.

Here is a link to their evidentiary requirements http://www.ssa.gov/disability/profession...

And a correlation for their process http://www.ssa.gov/dibplan/dqualify5.htm

Good luck!
I would advice you to dance straight to the SOCIAL SECURITY office, because depending on your robustness problem, only they will be capable of tell you why you qualify or don't qualify. This item about disability attorneys (as far as I know) have been around for smaller number than ten years_of course I'm referring to those "specialized" only surrounded by disability cases. They must have sprung up basically about impossible to tell apart time the "bankruptcy" ones did!!!

Just like immigration attorneys (from what I hear on radio shows, read on papers, etc.) they simply serve better in those cases which are pretty natural, the ones each individual could receive done on his own, except that everyone sooner or later get lured by them.

I was aware with social payment disability somehow since a family contestant had to apply over twenty years ago. I own no idea how things hold changed since, and I'm sure in several instances it is pretty difficult. But I'm also sure that all principal health problems which impede a personage from performing the job he's be doing most of his life and/or from doing most other similar ones, must qualify him or her.

Only one who will explain to you straight it is disability office. If you are told you don't qualify, and you do know there's no mode you can perform any work anymore, afterwards shop around for attorneys with proven annals!
You pay the allowed fees.

Most social security disability lawyer will take you satchel on a contingency basis. Any fees will be deduct from what you are due to receive from Social Security.
If you think that you enjoy a case after you would better off getting a disability attorney. I hold known several relations that the doctors said that they were disable to work but when they applied for disability they be denied. Once they got a disability attorney they get approved. There are attorneys that will only charge if they win your covering

When Laws Are Changed Decriminalizing Something, What Happens To Those Previously Prosecuted For It?

I'm using this as an example: Let's just read out that drugs such as marijuana and cocaine are not illegal to possess and go anymore in adjectives 50 states. What happens to those empire who have be convicted of crimes relating to something that the laws are presently changed?

Are they simply let walk or do they have to crowd out their remaining sentence regardless of the legal change?
Answers: The convictions stand unless . . . . Usually there is companion legislation allowing direct release and often authorizing automatic pardon.
Those convicted before a correction in ruling are subject to law contained by force at the time of their conviction.

If Women are so Independent, .. ......

Howcome in a divorse THEY GET HALF OF ****
if she didn't sign the prenub ?
Answers: They werent so independent afterall.
Being independent and divorce are separate issues.
One have nothing to do near the other.
Sometimes the men aren't the primary breadwinners, but marriage is still considered a partnership. I deliberate here in Michigan, the minimum split if 45/65. My cousin made much more than her husband, but she disappeared him. He got 65%, and she get 45%. So, really...it has zilch to do with nouns.
I'm sorry...that happened to u. Not adjectives women are like that though so chill I get divorced from my husband and didn't ask for crap but child support but hardly get that lol. We're back together presently for our childerns sake and still have our ups and downs but are more seasoned in different situations. If you enjoy childern that may be also why she got so much it is manner to take comfort of them if u don't then close to I said sorry... I'm not a materialistic woman so I guess thats why I didn't care I know I could take thinking of our daughter and that was adjectives I focused on not what I could get out of him. If anything it open my eyes to being a single mother and have me start school again to better our lives
CLEVER LADY, TELL ME WHO AND I CAN GET SOME TIPS LOL
women be meant to be the more dependent sex.
If a woman marry a man and is the sole breadwinner, she must also give partly to the husband.

The concept behind this is that marital is a partnership and binding contractual agreement. Take, for example, a couple that marries at 18. Spouse 1 go on the college while Spouse 2 works right out of highschool to support the other going to college. Spouse 1 graduates and get a great job beside great benefits and pay. Spouse 1 earn and aquires assets. Spouse 2 takes keeping of the children and home and keeps a part of the pack time job.

They split. While spouse 1 technically earn the money, it could not have be done without the financial and other support of spouse 2 who sacraficed their potential professional go for the good of the partnership and the ethnic group under the presumption that it would benefit adjectives.

Also, in most cases of conjugal accounting, pre-marital assets are treated entirely differently than ones aquired during marriage.

Also don't know what the heck a pre-nuB is.
In California, women/men share 50-50. Regardless if she signed a prenub, or not. Why should a 21 and a 23 yr weak couple sign pre-nups when they have $100 between them? Later, as they breed more money, she/he should share the bounty, not just him. Or is this the 18th century, where on earth the man made the rules and took all of the money and home?

Independent doesn't show stupid. I would never allow a man to walk away near everything I helped him to earn..If I cooked, cleaned and kept the home running, it is singular fair that I live not within the last century, but within this one. Men think differently as you would expect. That is why there are courts and UN armed forces. Some still manage to put by some money and etc. but luckily, most people are generous to each other.
I married lacking a prenub, even though I had the home and the ridge account, and he have the bills and nothing else. Stupid of me, but he is a unbiased man, and we have a trust that protects what I brought into the conjugal. We also have it set up that he get his share of what he has contributed after he started in your favour and being smarter near finances. Again, the key word is A GOOD PERSON. I wont' help yourself to him and he won't take me, because we married for love, not gain!!!

Those celebrity without prenups are not sagacious..the Beatle as an example. But that is their own responsibility, and we are speaking of much more money than the average couple. He trusted and was not prudent. Even with a pre-nup, the lawyer would have a area day, because that is to say what lawyers do.

I hope you know the difference of independent and fair. Different meaning.
Because they deserve it. Most women traditionally stayed home to raise children and look after the house. Nowadays it's not strange for them to still do adjectives of that AND hold down a full-time job at like time. They also do way more than their f¨ēte share of the cooking, laundry and cleaning - and they do it without gratefulness - often for frequent years. They also have to matter with the husband when he get home from work. This is why women get partly - they earned it. lol :-)

Legal problems when shopping with an online merchant. Need Help Please!!!?

I be on a website and was competent to get coupons to stack. I ordered greatly of stuff and now it seem the site has caught on and have cancelled all my outstanding advice and is intercepting any orders not nonetheless delivered. They hold also cancelled all directions that I place for other people too. Am I within trouble? I was albe to receive almost 75% off on most items. Cant sleep. What do I do? BTW I own already received some of the items I ordered.
Answers: Did you KNOW they weren't supposed to be able to stack? If you did, and did it anyway, you could be guilty of fraud or embezzlement by deception.

I have it in mind, if I found a way to bring around the alarms near the door of an electronics store, would it be their blame for having bleak alarms? No, it would be mine for stealing. Just because you've already received them, doesn't mean they don't hold the right to ask for them back.

What they do probably depends on how expensive the items be. Will it be worth it to them to take permissible action?
Generally, you may not "stack" coupons within any situation and the compounding effect of such is legal motion. They may file civil rationale of action, as in good health as criminal prosecution. I recommend seeking legal guidance. You have violated federal law, and committed breach of contract.

What do you think more or less Child abandonment law and Safe Havens?

I was shocked to hear that some ancestors actually enjoy an objection to these laws. They voice that by making it legal and anonymous for girls to drop their unwanted children rotten at Hospitals, Fire Dpt., etc, is sending a message that it is ok and that it will encourage teen pregnancy. I see the point, but it seem ridiculous. First of all, knowing that you can drop rotten your baby if it is unwanted will NOT cheer teen pregnancy, because these girls would still have to fur their pregnancy for nine months and then tender birth with no hospital or drugs. Second, I suppose that letting these woman off free for abandon their child is a much better alternative to finding these children in dumpsters. I'm basically curious as to how other people grain about these law and what do you think can be done to put them within to effect in adjectives States. Currently they have single passed legislation in Alabama and Texas.
Answers: I haven't thought give or take a few the issue enough to own a personal opinion. However, one of the problems next to safe haven law I've heard is that child forsaking is presented as an easy risk without any required counseling or an explanation of alternatives, such as a well-planned adoption.

I deliberate this is a valid concern since, in heaps child abandonment cases, these girls are particularly young and emotionally fractured. They repeatedly come from broken homes and/or bad relationships. The finding to abandon the child may be made carelessly without much thought or support from others. Especially within these cases, a decision to pass over their child shouldn't be made without some counseling next to a trained professional.

I should also mention that I am from Texas. Even with the out of danger haven laws here, babies are still mortal abandoned within dumpsters. While safe haven law may be the "feel good" solution, their worth still hasn't been established.

As some practical counsel from a person who argues for a living, one through problem with your argument is that you automatically assume sheltered haven laws are powerful. You bash other arguments without ever establishing whether not dangerous haven laws are even significant for your purpose. I think your argument would be much stronger if you be also able to prove the efficiency of safe haven law in the states where on earth they have be passed (e.g., with some statistics).

Edit: Sensitive much? Re-read my answer. I didn't "attack" you. I simply said you hold provided no proof that safe haven law are effective. If you hold any proof that safe haven law are effective, consequently your crusade to pass sheltered haven laws within all states would be much more persuasive.

I own not seen any statistics proverb that Texas safe haven law are effective. In Texas, babies are still man dumped in dumpsters even next to safe haven law. Many girls who do take benefit of safe haven law regret their decision, but cannot return with their baby fund.

You ask what the harm is beside implementing safe and sound haven laws. One damage is that a young girl who is uninformed of the consequence of her appointments, and hastily surrenders her babe to a fire department, may live to regret her decision for the rest of her life span. If a girl is 14 years old, she may own to live with this horrible conclusion for the next 80+ years.

Another mar is that safe haven law ignore the home structure. If the birth mom is not willing to transport care of the child, a parent, grandparent, aunt, or uncle may be likely to raise the child. The child may be better bad in the long run next to her biological family or even a close friend of the clan, as opposed to complete strangers within the adoption or foster system.

No one will disagree with you that babies within dumpsters are bad. However, protected haven laws hold their own problems that need to be at address, at the very lowest possible, before implement them in adjectives states.
I feel that they should be allowed to drop their babe off in need prosecution but they should be required to pay an second tax respectively year when they file. I do not mind babe-in-arms safe haven, I do mind paying for the children of others. Having a child is not a shared expense. I have a son and one on the means of access, I will be supporting them and no one else As it should be.

Is against the law if a Merchant change a credit card receipt after I signed it?

Answers: Yes, unless you hold mutually agreed to the change.
Depends on the conveyance. They cannot alter the terms of a transaction to your disadvantage after you sign or otherwise adopt it.


** Note: This is a general discussion of the subject event of your question and not official advice. Local law or your particular situation may swing the general rules. For a specific answer to your sound out you should consult legal counsel next to whom you can discuss all the facts of your travel case. **
The ONLY time a merchant can re-run a credit card is at restaurants that ask you if you'd like to put the tip/gratuity on your card. When they swipe the card, you'll acquire back the acceptance to sign..but if you notice, here will be a line below the charge for the suppertime that says "tip"..next "total" on the line below that. If you choose to donate a tip on the card, YOU write in the amount to be added to the regular charge..total it up..and YOU write it on the "total" column. The merchant is then allowed to re-run your card to search out the tip amount for your server..but ONLY for that amount. Keep an eye on your own receipt for when your credit card statement comes within the mail. Look over the charge, as per what your statement say..and compare the amount to your receipt and what YOU YOURSELF authorized. If things newly don't add up...its unlawful, and you can press charges to make them remuneration for restitution.

More Questions and Answers:
[864] - [1844] - [1124] - [1697] - [254] - [1020] - [1086] - [62] - [2361] - [1297] - [1553] - [614] - [2478] - [662] - [2386] - [1375] - [1695] - [436] - [138] - [1176]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: