Law Questions and Answers

Is adultry a crime in Maine?

Answers: Probably not, but I deliberate that it should be. The innocent are hurt, especially children.
Adultery, I do not believe is a criminal offense in ME. It is grounds for a divorce (a dissolution of a valid contract).

I believe contained by contracts and if the contract is breached then the injured knees-up ought to be able to recuperate his/her damages.

So as long as I don't pry too much into the illness,?

I can, as an employer, request a written information from a doctor explaining the employee is inept to perform? Also, does anyone know where it would be written?
Answers: Yes, as long as it's related to Workers Comp or long or short possession disablity coverage. Check the link below. It's adjectives about employer and HIPAA.

Qualifications?

Does anyone on yahoo answers not answer questions because they are not qualified? I see that a lot of nation answer law question with a simple yes or no answer beside no supporting evidence.
Answers: . Yes.
wait! no.

Shouldn't fines for committing a crime be adjusted by income?

I propose, if it's a maximum $500 fine for smoking in a public place; consequently technically a millionaire could do it all the time and not fastidiousness.

Can't they see how much $500 is per an average income and find a percentage to use.

Maybe something like "$200 or 2.5%" so that approach poor people could still procure fined.

Your thoughts?
Answers: Administratively this idea would never work. How do you prove how much someone make? What kind of income do you count? What something like a retiree with no income but a giant net worth? What going on for a wife who makes no income but the husband make a large income? What around a child who makes no income but he parents take home high income?

I suspect you haven't taken the time to suggest about how to enforce your belief.
That loine of reasoning makes no sense. By your logic folks who are poor should be even more motivated to not commit a crime since they would be unable to afford the fines.

Secondly, how would one step about proving they cannot afford the fine. If that be the case veryobdy who committed a crime would argue poverty.

There is a clich¨¦ that goes, if you cannot do the time, don't do the crime, like peas in a pod logic follows if one cannot afford the fine. Or in an try to be fair we can put them surrounded by jail for a few days.
The just way that your income comes into play next to the law is your bail amount. That is why we see approaching one million dollar bails for people who are surrounded by the middle class income in taxes and for equal crime on a lower income bracket its going to be some around 200 grand or something. We see stuff similar to that all the time and i read between the lines how come we don't do this for normal fines for smoking law or speeding tickets and some judges do lift notice surrounded by the amount you pay if speak you show up to court and show last years taxes and voice I cant pay a fine so big and most bench will say within is a payment plan here.

So its adjectives a Catch 22 no matter what channel you look at fines and bails. I think they should be set for that individuals tax bracket.
I may be wrong, but that would be a double standard later. A fine is established for offending in an nouns. In Ohio, at least, if you be in motion to court and are found guilty with a hefty fine, below MOST circumstances, you can work out a repayment plan. The courts will consider the income of the individual and try to work with them. I hope this help you.

Why are some askers so cowardly?

I recently answered a grill - on a subject I know quite closely about - by describing the poster that no-one could sensibly answer her put somebody through the mill without more facts. She responed by sending me a horrid email - to which I couldn't reply since she's blocked emails. Why are so many ethnic group online such cowards that they feel free to label ad hominem attacks on race who're trying to help, and consequently hide astern Yahoos mail blocks ?

Richard
Answers: It behooves every man to remember that the work of the critic is of altogether lower importance, and that contained by the end, progress is practised by the man who does things.
Ignore the weak...
They can't frontage the fact that I don`t know they.. *gasp*... asked a weird and/or confusing cross-examine. For they are god.

Good question :]
Because they're trying to mortgage an agenda - not obtain an answer to a interview - and often do so in need the benefit of facts.

Get used to it - it happens profoundly around here.
yup, i hate that too.

might not own been intentional tho. but don't u yearning you could have responded to her email?

it's completely frustrating when someone asks: can u help? and completely sketchy details.

i say they're guilty of not asking a clothed answerable question, and we should throw the book at em.

and btw, my email isn't blocked so if anyone doesn't agree and they want to messages, they can, but i still don't have to answer. or you could be only spam to me, and go right into my del folder.
It's the anonymity Rick. I enjoy had folks in chat and on blogs, intuitively attack me, because my opinion be different than theirs.
Some have used native tongue I doubt they would use, if we were toe to toe, If you know what I be a sign of.
I am currently having an exchange of design about the 9/11 attacks near a Britt. So far, we have agreed to disagree. Civilly I might put in.
Just ignore the jerk. I do.
You just answered your sound out.

They are cowards!

Some people inopportunely use this site to spew hatred, racism, ignorance & bigotry, however we are all anonymous.

This is the simply way they can remain mortal the idiots they are!
I don't accept E-mails and never enjoy from anyone one reason for this is the hulking large number of mindless and virulent hoarding hominem attacks on YA. The other reason is I'm afraid I spend too much time on YA when I own other things to do and answering E-mails from people who single want to vent their spleen all over me is not my hypothesis of a good use of time.
I hope that I don't label ad hominem attacks though I concede some of my answers can be a little sharp but polite I hope.
several people dispatch imaginery questions, sometime indistinct questions, question, sometime irrelevent and false questions, we should be alert to avoid, fail to acknowledge and discourage such people by not attending to their put somebody through the mill,
People are afraid of truth and the fear that your current thoughts may be wrong can be pretty big to overcome.
I get reported to Yahoo for advising a questioner that his cross-question could not be understood as posted. It be a "collection" of letters that did not spell any words that I am aware of. I appealed the report and be told by the Yahoo "gods" that I "indeed" did not answer the question so be in ruin of the Community Guidelines.
A lot of good points by previous answerers. Just a new thing gone: most groups and forums I've frequented previously, at some point had a mental problems discussion - and a great deal, a lot of posters talk about their bipolar disorder, OCD, etc. (The first time I saw that I be surprised.) Now, I know that it's just anecdotal evidence and doesn't prove much, but I endeavour a guess that some people on Yahoo! Answers are correspondingly mentally disturbed...

PS- really, why don't you post her ID for all to delight in?
> ad hominem attacks

Because their rhetorical skills are not up to yours ;)

.don't sweat population like that :)
Shame on those who are close to that,cheers for those who are not. There is also something about pearls and some cattle farm animals. You know that most of us appreciate your answers even if we did not asked the questions.

Freedom of speech at school?

how come we are prohibited to speak are minds at school if we hold freedom of speech why do they take it away from us?
Answers: Well you hold to explain the situation better. If your talking just about giving a right wing opinion to your peers, consequently that's because public school and university are becoming politically correct as we speak. The leftist society is brainwashing our pupils and teachers into educating everybody next to their crap. They won't let anyone speak otherwise due to the reality that they want nothing but their view and that nothing else can contradict it. If you obligation more help, jump to http://www.heritage.org and type in the topic within the search box.
near freedom of speech comes responsibility. the responsibility to behave properly.
Are you saying your college doesn't give you the "freedom" during a math exam, for example, to of late start talking beside a fellow student about how great you did playing Nintendo the dark before?
is that the freedom you drought? believe it or not, it's for people approaching you that these rules had to be created contained by the first place. Grow Up, bud
Freedom of speech has not be absolute since something like 15 minutes after the Bill of Rights were made into ruling.

In school settings, school have be given broad discretion/authority to limit speech that interferes next to the primary functions of the school: educating the mases. Anything explicitly not conducive to that end or is disruptive to it can be restricted.

There is some great suitcase law out near about what can and cannot be done surrounded by schools.

Armbands worn within protest during the Vietnam Conflict are permissible exercises of speech because they did not disrupt university activities and the lessons mission.

Putting out a "Bong Hits for Jesus Banner" during the Olympic Torch run in Alaska be found not permissible freedom of speech because it be counter to the educational mission of the college, disruptive to good establish in the arts school. This despite the fact that the students be not in university at the time (released early) and not on school property at the time.

School reporters are also restricted to some degree despite have some freedom of expression and journalistic freedoms as well. What they print cannot be counter to the conservatory mission or disruptive, but they can get a means of access with greatly.

In sum, school's have a primary mission of educating the loads and ensuring that school maintain correct order and discipline for a substantial number of minors. The adults in that environment attain to assess, monitor, and restrict as they are put in charge of the entire student body and must set standards that protect ALL from the name-calling of the freedom practiced by a few
Freedom of speech comes with responsibility.There is an appropriate time to speak up and a time when you must keep hold of your mouth closed.

It's called "rules"...we adjectives have them...we adjectives must follow them.

You are in arts school to get an lessons, not to excercise your Constitutional rights.. You have to be an grown to have full rights anyway.
School is a forum for educating students; not a forum for students to conduct special interest platforms, and school are allowed to establish rules of conduct and can expell those who do not comply.

Remember this: freedom of speech has solid legal limitations, and a human being can get into trouble for axiom certain things: three examples; 1) a personage cannot say things, within piblic, for the purpose of inciting at roit, 2) a person cannot variety certain threats, and 3) Shakespeare said; "the first article we should do is kill adjectives the lawyers." Had he said: "Somebody should decimate (name a specifice attorney) at noon tomarrow." The Bard may own had a allowed problem had somebody done purely that.

When students are asked by a teacher to express their personal reasoning or view or analysis regarding an assigned topic or specific subject and to show their reasoning justifying same, after the student is free to pontificate to the best of his/her ability,and to do so in need censorship, however, analysis and rebuttle may be forthcoming either from other student participant or the instructor.

Students who disagee with an instructor should request a private audience beside the instructor for inquisitive descusion on the matter: asking the instrutor question about "why" s/he think what s/he said (taught) in class-- and, instead of making statements in relation to personal (the student's) beliefs, ask questions instead---example: instead of motto; " I believe, or I think, so and so," try it this bearing; "What about so and so..or, what in the order of 'John Doe's' conclusions regarding so and so?" By asking question instead of making statements one comes off smaller amount confrontational---a handy approach when one is addressing their personal disagreement near that someone face to obverse, especially teachers. By asking question, instead of making statements, the instructor may be more responsive in providing mixing, possibly needed, explanation regarding something critical you may have missed (overlooked) or forgotten.

An inqusitive student is a blessing whereas a confrontational, young student can become a problem, and the only difference between the two students may be nil more than maturity of attitude: showing disrespect towards someone won't put you on their angelic side.

Teachers should teach students how to deduce, not what to think. There are a few exceptions to this rule: here's two: 2 plus 2 (both positive) equals 4. The law of nature (chemistry and physics) go no room for dispute except by new rational concepts subject to scientic testing.

One must protract a priority with respect to maintain a certain writ of things, and school is not an exception to this rule; it's rugged to learn anything within a state of caos.

In Civil Lawsuit what is a Settlement Conference, Settlement, Meditation, and a Summary Judgment?

Best answer to all will receive the points.
Answers: "In Civil Lawsuit what is a Settlement Conference"

It's a interview between the parties to try to negotiate a settlement before the bag goes to trial. (May be the party themselves, or just their lawyer, or both parties and their lawyer.

"Settlement"

A settlement is a deal made beforehand trial which allows the parties to liberate the hassle of going to court.

"Meditation"

Meditation is sitting cross-legged chanting "Om... Om. Om."

"Mediation", however, is when you hire someone - typically a retired decide or the like - to achievement as a neutral f¨ºte to help the two sides come to a mutually acceptable settlement.

"and a Summary Judgment?"

A summary judgment is a pronouncement issued by the court without holding a full trial because there's no endorsed controversy to argue. If someone sues you, and they have no court grounds to do so, then the believe to be will issue a summary judgment contained by your favor, and you don't even have to travel to court.

Richard
A Settlement Conference is where both party (attorneys or if you rep yourself) appear in a court room to try to resolve the concern.
A Mediation is basically impossible to tell apart thing but, as you would expect, the actual parties would be present to try to achieve a resolution.
A Summary Judgment is like a motion, it's primarily a pleading to the court to dismiss the complaint b/c of case ruling. So if your adversary file a Summary Judgment, they are basically asking the court to dismiss your complaint or a claim.
Settlement conference: round-table of the parties to see if the issue can be settled past going in front of the intercede

Settlement - joint agreement to settle the dispute and the expressions of that agreement

Mediation (not meditation) - the parties assemble in the presence of a (trained and qualified) third shindig to try to find a resolution to the disagreement, which may include the terms of settlement that both party would accept. Usually bits and pieces metioned during mediation cannot be used later surrounded by court, should the trial still be necessary (that is, the mediation fails).

Summary Judgement - Judge rules,lacking the full trial, that certain aspects of the casing, or even the entire case, are clear in need requiring trial, and then pass judgement according to the law and those facts. Frequently settlements are rubber stamped by a summary judgement, at lowest possible as far as I understand it.

I am not a legal representative but I have friends and siblings who are, and I hold acted on my own behalf (represented myself) in civil court. Basically, I am not completely oblivious in this nouns, but I am also not an expert so maybe a better answer will come from someone else.
Settlement conference is where on earth both sides meet contained by Court but not formally in a conference room, I don`t know with the Court Attorney and they try to resolve the armour right there near a settlement. They discuss the relative merits of the case. If unsuccessful they set a date for trial.
Settlement is where on earth both sides agree on a disposition of the case, its reduced to a writing signed by both sides and a copy is submitted to the Court to close the armour.
Mediation is a non Court way of resolving the dispute within is a mediator instead of a Judge. The rules of evidence are more informal and its used to cut the litigation time and expense down.
Summary Judgment is the outcome of a Motion for Summary Judgment. This motion tell the Court that there is no issue of triable certainty and the Judge can decide the shield based upon the paperwork provided surrounded by the Motion. If successful the prevailing party get a Summary Judgment, to dismiss the case or they win money.
Rich

The question is what is the intent of N.J.A.C. § 10A:31-8.5 (b)(2)?

I own inquiry which has puzzled me which I request the issue to be address.
There is a tunnel which connects the Camden County Correctional facility beside the Hall of justice, where on earth particular inmates turn threw three (3) doors to reach the Hall of Justice underneath continuance of surveillance for purposes of Bail hearings or CJP. Prior to entrance within the first door Camden County Correctional facility correctional officers three contained by number strip search three of the focused inmates. Then the particular inmates are handcuff and shackled by officers from the Sherriff department and escorted under your own steam to the second and third doors. Once the particular inmates walk in and come out the elevator they enter a holding cell until presented to CJP or Superior Court Judge. Once they hold ended near presentment they are taking back to holding cell afterwards escorted back down the elevator going threw a first, second and third door contained by reverse order.
Answers: You explained the procedure, but not what you are inquisitive about it.

Can a cop arrest or give a summons to a 16 year weak with grocery plenty that contain closed containers of beer?

If you are 16 and pulled over by the cops, and you are doing nothing wrong, except walking near your friends and each of you have a bag beside beer in it, can the cops rightfully search you if you influence no, as well as supply you a summons or arrest you. Or may you simply just vote no to the question "Can we see what is contained by that bag?" (i.e. they own no reasonable suspicion beyond teenagers next to black grocery bags.)

(This applies to United States imperative, more specifically Brooklyn, New York, as I know state and local laws can alter.)
Answers: In the fifty U.S. states, it is against the law for anyone underneath the age of twenty-one to posses, consume or buy any type of liquor including beers. Cops can't just stop you to ask what's within your bag unless they can see what's in them surrounded by plain view (let's speak, your bay is made of clear plastic). But if they own seen you buying liquor or beers contained by a store and you definitely look to be underage, not just you are going to jail but whoever sold you the beers as in good health. The law is amazingly clear and it applies in adjectives fifty states, zero tolerance on underage drinking. If you are underage, don't tramp around with liquor contained by your bags, the mere possession of it give intent to consume it. In NYC, you will get a mandatory sentence of twenty-five years within jail for possession of any forbidden drug no matter how small the amount is. I don't know what the sentence is for possession of liquor while one underage. Please wait until you are 21. That's the canon.
Since you must be 21 to purchase alcohol, yes they can arrest you for having un-opened beer on a public sidewalk, etc.

Now if you are at home and your old-fashioned man or mother gives you a beer, that's different.
I don't believe it is prohibited for underage kids to simply hold beer, but I really don't know.

However, they can search those plenty in two ways:
1) You endow with them permission OR
2) They own probable cause.

You can send regrets to let them flush, but if they believe they have probable end in, then they will turn out it anyway, regardless of whether they have your authority or not. This confuses some people because they feel that once they refuse, the policeman can't do anymore, but they usually will ask authorization just to generate it easier on themselves so they don't have to verbs about probable motive. You would be able to face the search of the pod in court if you don't believe the police officer have probable cause.
Cops can complete stop & frisks with no motive, or warrant, If you are holding something-a bag, for instance-they own the right to seperate you from it for their safety. Perhaps you hold a gun in it. In seperating you from the backpack, they may clearly see the beer without if truth be told searching it. Seeing the beer give them cause to survey, arrest, ticket, or whatever else they want. Minors surrounded by possession of beer is a crime. " I was a short time ago carrying it home from the store " is not a valid defense because you have no right to buy it/pick it up at the store, or transport it home.

How long does it typically take to receive an SSDI (not SSI) award reminder?

I received a fully favorable decision from the ALJ at the initiation of this month. I waited over two years for that chunk of the process to be complete, how much longer should I plan on waiting? Once I do receive the award letter or request for second info will I have to skulk again for checks to start? I am trying to decide what to give an account the bill collectors who call on a daily basis.
Answers: The not so nice answer, again, is it depends. General rule of thumb is 90 to 120 days. If you had be denied again, you would have have 60 days to appeal the decision. Read your Favorable Decision; it states that the Appeals Council on it's own motion can review your outcome within that 60 days. Most of the time, the grant centers will not process payment until that 60 days have lapsed OR if the Appeals Council denies review (it leaves the decision alone).

Usually after the pocket money centers begin to process the claim - expect 30 days (give or take) for salary to be processed. If you're under age 50, you will be assigned to one of lots payment centers (called PC). It also depends if you will be subject to any offset/windfall eradication provisions (did you receive workers' comp? if so, your award notice will possible take a short time extra time. Certain PC's have be known to hold a 2 year backlog (but not so much for the initial payments, just other issues).
Also, you will predictable have the money earlier your Notice of Award. Make sure you have direct deposit set up at your CURRENT financial institution. Make sure you whip precautions to PROTECT your money from creditors (SS benefits are exempt from most creditors if, and only if, you can PROVE definitively that that money is within fact from SS. Set up a fresh separate bank narrative and the ONLY money to ever go into it will be directly from the SSA or directly traceable to SS monies.)

You entail to make a choice - your financial peace of mind by paying your creditors, or your financial warranty - unsecured creditors (excluding government back funds) cannot touch or garnish your SS benefits. Record those phone call if it is legal to do so where on earth you live. If they threaten to garnish your SS benefits, to be precise illegal and you will know how to sue the.

I wish you the best.
In a smaller nouns where here not so many populace anywhere from 12 to 18 months. In the bigger cities you will have 18 to 24 months to hang about. Regardless of your disability you will be refused your first 2 attempts to apply. If you beckon social security and report to them you are having a financial crises they will submission to help you find a homeless shelter where on earth you can live.
Then there are the shyster lawyer who specialize in SSDI. They try to extend the amount of time you enjoy to wait because the longer you dawdle the more they make. You do not obtain SSDI for the 1st 5 months you are unable to work and after that the attorney takes 30%.
Your best bet is to call for your Senator's office. The hold a laison who works on constituents claims. But unless you are deathly ill here may not be much they can do.
Be prepared to wait a long time.
Did you sign up for direct deposit or regular checks? It seem like direct deposit is much faster (from personal experience). I'm sure it's thorny to remember since you applied so long ago. I think it can rob up to 6 weeks though. Congratulations, that's a long wait!

More Questions and Answers:
[1155] - [628] - [2442] - [1103] - [1293] - [2417] - [2322] - [1734] - [297] - [503] - [387] - [1345] - [1893] - [950] - [841] - [347] - [1292] - [1341] - [1283] - [2112]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: