Law Questions and Answers

Banning prostitution?

Government ideas are mooted for outlawing prostitution. I'd like to know people's view. I have freshly four comments :

1. I doubt if the trade/ activity can be prevented effectively. It's not the sort of thing you can stop completely. Better to regulate what you can't prevent ?

2. Nobody would condone the sex-slavery and human trafficking that habitually goes along next to prostitution. But prostitution doesn't necessarily mean these things.

3. My guess would be that buying sex is rubbish contained by comparison with have sexual relations with someone you diligence about and are occupied with.

4. But isn't prostitution - or can't it be - basically another application of the market - a voluntary transaction on gala terms ? Or are within reasons why it is never voluntary and other & inherently exploitative of women ?

Harriet Harman, who's mainly astern the mooted legislation, is a warm heart and a winner of women. But is she right on this one ? If prostitution ended, fine : on the other hand to illegalise ?
Answers: "2. Nobody would condone the sex-slavery and human trafficking that often go along with prostitution. But prostitution doesn't necessarily tight these things."
That's more likely to come about with illegitimate operations than legitimate ones so legalising and regulating prostitution would be a better way to combat the problem (since the respectable legally recognized brothels are not going to be involved in any of that crap).

There's also evidence that allowing prostitution may run down the incidence of rape.

Sometimes prostitutes are exploited while other times it's more a case of the prostitutes exploiting their clients. It's usually the illicit ones that get exploited the worst.

There is also the public strength aspect to worry more or less. When prostitution is legal they tend not to spread STD's around (and usually own lower infection rates than average) along with regular carrying out tests but if it is illegal after prostitutes tend to be more likely to hold STD's and to spread them around (and their clients will also usually spread them).
It comes down to choice. If women claim abortion is their choice since its their body then prostitution should be permitted by their choice.

So should drugs and suicide. If it is your body it should be legal to do anything you want to it.
Agree next to your points.

It shouldn't be banned.

Sex is allowed & selling is legal; So why shouldn't selling sex be court?

The only true crimes are those that involve instigation of terror campaign &/or intentional deceptions. Prostitution does not necessarily require any...so, it doesn't need to be unauthorized.
There are places where prostitution is court, and it's regulated (protected and licensed), and it works.

When people want to buy-- drugs/ sex -- they'll find a bearing to buy.

Self reglulation is the only entry that makes any sense.

If a woman wishes to sell her body to a man for his pleasure, I'm not sure what the point is of preventing that transaction.
The reality is, this is a morality issue.
If the government did things effieciently, in that would be brothels owned by the government, adjectives the tarts AND the johns would be tested for STDs, and the floosies would work for a do wage and get form insurance and other benefits, they would also be regularly tested for drugs, if a girl was found to be taking something undemocratic, she would have to transmit the narcs who she bought it from or she would be labeled "for sadists only". The profits earned would be used to clear for health insurance for the uninsured.
While this would be a big recovery in the populations vigour, it would also make the state a pimp, so it can't do this, so, it must any stop prostitution or attempt to, either path the state comes out ahead morally.
It should be legal. Peoples' morals should not guide a citizen's sex time. If a person requirements to pay money for sex consequently he should be allowed to. Prostitution is legal contained by some counties in Nevada. The prostitutes' work is locked and healthy. Legal prostitution is a popular business within Nevada because it brings in billions of dollars per year to the state of Nevada. Somebody must be paying for it.

Can I take this soul to court?

About three months ago I loaned someone $230 to pay their vehicle payment because they be behind on bills. The agreement be that they would pay me put money on. There was no written agreement. Stupidly I thought that I could trust this individual to pay me final. When I confronted this person nearly paying me back they said that they didnt owe me anything and that they dont enjoy to pay me rear.
Can I take this human being to small claims court to get my money vertebrae even though theire was not a written agreement? Or am I newly s*%t out of luck?
Answers: Yes, but you'll have convince the sort out that it you loaned the person the money. Do you enjoy a cancelled check or a bank statement to prove that you withdraw the $230? If you do, you will also have to convice the style guru that the money was indeed a loan and not a bequest.

Good Luck
Well, you could take them to court, but it may not be your best move.
Unfortunately, they will most possible argue that they thought it was a offering, and the judge will own no proof saying otherwise.
it'd be ******* sweet if you could
i love court shows & adjectives that stuff.
but from what i learned from my man pass judgment mathis, there's no evidence that he actually agreed to paying you if it wasn't written down.
you can probably try though.
moral luck :]
This will depend on a few things:
First of all, a vocal contract is legally binding, so if you truly came to this agreement, it can be upheld within a court of law. The strong part of this is going to be proving that you in truth loaned them the money. How did you pay them? If it be cash, you are probably screwed. If you wrote a check, however, you are going to be seriously better off. Get a copy of the check from your mound, or your bank statement, or anywhere else where on earth you might find it, and your chances are going to boost substantially.
You could take them to small claims. But minus anything in writing or a wittness you will probably not win. If you did win, they could settle you $15.00 a month until it is paid stale. It is extremely hard to force donation of small claims.
Sadly, you would be wasting your time. Write it off as a lesson widely read.
A longer and slightly more nuanced version of impossible to tell apart answer the first person give:

There is no requirement that a contract be written to be valid, but it is hard to prove the language of the contract if you have no writing and no other evidence to pay for up your view of what the contrctual obligation were. Giving somebody $230 could be see by the court as a plausible gift, so near no written promise of repayment over time it seems as though it may be difficult to prove that repayment be owed to you.
Good answers above. Just wanted to append that it might not even be worth your while; it costs $50 to file, and consequently you factor in your time lost from work/school, travel and parking expenses at the court.

However, you can write it stale as a bad debt on your taxes.
Yes, you can purloin them to Small Claims Court for a very small file fee.

While it is true that a written agreement would hold been the "channel to go" -- you can argue an oral contract did exist. The amount of money involved allows for oral contracts.

You will state your case (I suggest you admit/state right away that here isn't a written agreement, and you wished you have done that ...)

You will need to prove your travel case -- which really means convince the believe to be that it's more likely your edition of the story is true, than it is the other person's version is true. (There isn't any of that "beyond a defensible doubt stuff in a small claims [civil] armour.)

You may be offered the choice of going before an Arbitrator a bit than a judge ... that's a conclusion you will have to create (and both have to agree to.)

There is also the outside haphazard that once the person who owes you the money is served beside court papers, they will just recompense you.

Or they may not show up, in which covering you will win by "default". You will then, however, hold to go through a process commonly prearranged as "Supplementary Process" to have the court's decision served on the defendant, a likely "show cause" audible range, and eventually a court-ordered payment proclaim. All of which can take closely of time, and upfront money from you -- however, assuming the defendant has any money, you will take all of your court costs rewarded to you as part of the taste against the defendant.
Sorry, you learned an expensive lesson: never loan money minus a written contract (loan agreement) which includes all the pertinent vocabulary and agreements necessary to protect your interest.

Court, especially small claims court, is really not the place for he said she said cases and no evidence to support any parties claim.

Question: Did you write the personality a check? If so, you have some evidence, if you noted the check as a loan within the Memo section on the lower disappeared front side of the check. Banks photo all cancelled checks, and copy of their their photo would confirm what you noted on the front of the check.
Forget it, short something in writing, you are lately wasting your time, and money for filing the claim contained by court.

What are some really big differences from canadian laws to U.S. law?

Are there any differences that really stand out between Canadian law and law contained by the U.S.?

I'm from the u.s. btw
Answers: U.S. has the 3 strikes rule where on earth as Canada you can commit a number of crimes back you get sentenced to secure unit and even then you may find weeks,months or years but never life.Even a existence sentence is only 25 years up to that time you're eligible for parole.
Drunk driving in the States can parkland you in send down on the first time where as within Canada some people own had from 5-10 previously they get sentenced to do time.
People contained by Canada can get caught next to a significant amount of pot and all they win is a fine and or probation...not jail time.
Canada doesn't allow anyone to take firearms on any occasion except for hunting and they hold to be kept as far from the driver as possible and the clip completely empty when transpoting the gun or rifle.Plus the firearm have to be registered with the elected representatives.
There's a lot more but that's adjectives I can think of at the moment that are significant.
We Canadians dont enjoy sentenced executions or even death itself.

You Americans do. You Americans do electric bench.
Canada: more tolerant of drugs, free health insurance

US: stricter penalty for certain crimes, more tolerant of guns, more capitalist
In the US evidence collected lacking a search warrant is inadmissible contained by court. In Canada, it is not necessary to enjoy one to collect evidence.

Can I carry a axe for self-defense in Michigan?

I don't want a concealed gun.. I want a stick. can I do ti in the state of michigan?
Answers: In most states, it is dependant on the knife's length. It can also be dependant on dependable features. A "switch-blade" knife is illicit in plentiful states.
Why must be a knife?
Why not a whistle?
For own sanctuary.
Luke 9.55-56
What do you think?
Why bother? A virtuous stick man can take a devout blade man any day. Come at me next to a knife when I am bare-handed, and I will break your wrist, verbs your arm off, and cut your throat beside your own blade. Come at me with a run through when I have a stick, and I will: break your wrist, break your elbow, break a few of your ribs, break your skipper, and then skin you near your own knife. Knives are over-rated,...especially by the candy-pants brigade who never go and get closer to combat than the nearest movie theater. Knives get you trouble near cops, trouble in court, trouble surrounded by the press, trouble next to public opinion, and never afford you a good ample defense to be worth all the hassle. Forget the knife. Learn: Judo, Karate, Boxing, Wrestling, and Bo-Ken.

I want to ask if stylerunway is really a big freaken fraud?

Answers: check out rippoffreport.com

report # 294569

Property Question?

Ok my problem is this in directive to get to a chore I do I need to I pilfer a shortcut which cuts 5 minutes off my hike. Yesterday when I went by I saw a palpably home made sign on city property saying no trespassing. But nearby are no city signs saying no trespassing. So is it really trespassing?
Answers: Call the City and ask them.
If you are sure it's city property AND you are sure the sign wasn't put up by the city, you can soundly ignore it.

But don't assume that topography is city property. A lot of times even paved streets and path are owned by private individuals.
Until you know for certain that it is not private property, assume it is trepassing. Also, lately because it is city property doesn't mean it's public property.

Can I apply for social services for my neice and nephew who are living with me?

I be just wondering if anyone know if I am able to apply for social services ( foodstamps, medical etc) for my neice and nephew. They hold been living near us for about a month. We do not hold custody or anything of them. Thanks
Answers: I work for the state and can answer your question: You may apply for assistance for your niece and nephew but you must also cooperate beside child support enforcement for their absent parents (2). Also, you can be eligible for dosh and medicaid assistance but food stamps requires your income to be included in the budget. Lastly, program requirements are different from state to state. You should contact your local department of children and family for assistance.
There is no reason you can't. I would.
What's the worst entry they're going to say, no?
It's adjectives based on your household's income.
Without official guardianship, no. You do need to receive legal guardianship though, because minus it, you cannot even get these children medical protection, or advocate for them at arts school. Talk to a lawyer specializing within family directive. The paperwork for temporary court guardianship is fairly straightforward and confident.

Report expired food?

where can i report expired food selling surrounded by korean grocery stores? if i want to send a formal memo with evidence and support? it's not only just one store.. almost every store does. it already became a norm..
Answers: Well, your local Health Department is the place to record such a complaint, their inspectors have the power and authority to enforce the strength code. Listen to Zebra Rider.

However, you must bear within mind that under most state form codes, as well as beneath the guidelines recommended by the FDA, in oodles cases it is perfectly official to sell "outdated" food products.

This requires a brief explanation. Food products are divided into two category: potentially hazardous and non-potentially hazardous.

Potentially hazardous foods are foods which, if outdated, could cause bug. Milk is considered such a food. So are eggs and meat. Expiration dates on these products must be followed by the stores, and it is largely illegal to provide such a product if expired.

On the other hand dry pasta, crackers, chocolate, candy, pickles, or can foods, are all NPH. This ability that no matter how stale the product become, it will never be an actual hazard to form. Such products are often explicit "best used by" or "sell by," but these are not equal as a true expiration date. These date codes are intended to indicate when the product will be best to taste, but mart after the date indicated is often still permitted.

Different states will enjoy different requirements as to the sale of outdated foods. Dating is not mandate under federal regulations, but a bit by the state health departments. Many states require that these foods be separated and clearly evident. Other states may not have this requirement.

A typical state statute for sale of "out-dated" food is as follows:

"Sale of Past Date Food Products: No creature shall offer for mart in the commonwealth any food product after the expiration of a "supply by date" or a "best if used by date" unless:
(1) It is wholesome and its sensory physical qualities enjoy not significantly diminished; and,
(2) It is segregated from food products which are not "olden date"; and,
(3) It is clearly and conspicuously marked any on the package or through the use of shelf marker or place cards, as being offered for mart after the recommended last date of mart or best use."

It can be difficult for a lay-person to know whether the date code they are looking at is a true expiration date, or simply a recommended sale date, since frequently the phrase "put up for sale by" is used in both cases. Your local condition department will be able to proposition you more information.

Of course, if you know of stores which are violating the imperative, the health department will want to hold one of their food inspectors check the situation. If the violations are serious satisfactory, a health officer may be assigned to pursue charges, but this is unlikely within the event it turns out to be simple carelesness (the real crimes start when stores forge and conceal the dates).
Your local Board of Health is potential the place with the most power and authority to pocket steps on this.

They can (and will) go and inspect. They can issue warning; issue fines; have the offending products removed; shut the store down.

The other great article about "Boards of Health" is that they are usually not adjectives tied up politically with the city or town they are surrounded by -- as most of their authority to act is granted to them from state law (and sometimes federal laws).

The only downside is that they, approaching most every agency, are understaffed. But don't let that deter you! They WANT to protect citizens from harmful situations and conditions -- and can act wayyyy faster than (most) other political agencies.

--------------------------------------...
[Edit: 12/30/07]

I have forgotten about what Jason W say in his answer (below). He's get the right answer ... so you will need to check on what types of outdated foods this store is selling.

The local Board of Health may be interested surrounded by this store(s) anyway -- or they may already know about it. Give them a phone and see!

/edit
If you don't want the expired food DON'T BUY THERE
the health dept would be the ones to discuss to.
You can report it to the county health department.


However, information that it may not be illegal to trade expired food. Some types of food have indubitable grace periods.

The Death Penalty and Lethal Injection, what do you think of my feelings?

I was contained by a class and we began chitchat about the passing penalty and poisonous injection. My teacher begin telling everyone the controversies, the court cases, and how some relations believe the lethal injection cause pain. I begin to think give or take a few the four chemicals and what it exactly does to the body. I came to an conclusion that it didn't result in pain on the belief of philosophy and experience. My defense is one of the injections make the prisoner unconscious. The subsequent injection causes "pain". So I begin to think that because we are not conscious of the strain, therefore the niggle doesn't comprehend fully into our thoughts. I spoke the opinion to the class and trainer. Further saying, my own experience of when I be sent to the hospital and the doctors had to unadventurous me and push/pull my arm bones back into place. It be said that I was screaming; however, I hold no memory of the pain. That is what I believe is stirring to the inmates getting the Lethal Injection. What do you think?
Answers: "Anesthetic - Sodium thiopental, which have the trademark name Pentothal, puts the inmate into a insightful sleep.This drug is a barbiturate that induces general anesthesia when administered intravenously. It's believed by some that after this anesthetic is deliver, the inmate doesn't feel anything."

Then, the muscle relaxant injection comes subsequent, and then the toxic potassium chloride, which cause the patient to travel into cardiac arrest.

Your theory sounds correct. My dad has epilepsy and when he have a seizure, his muscles strung out up and he becomes knocked out, which usually results in him severely biting his tongue. He say that he doesn't feel any discomfort until he's conscious again. So, yea, with the anesthesia to be exact administered, the patient is probably knock out and doesn't register the pain, even he or she may be aware of it, and therefore it isn't sore.
Who cares they deserve it.

An eye for an eye
ably a firing squad doesn't cause any backache either, it's done and over so swift they don't know what hit them.

That's what they do to cows to slaughter them is shoot them in the pave the way with one bullet, if you muse that's inhumane you shouldn't eat meat consequently
well if someone kill your mom (or someone else you loved), as in tortured her...

would you want the murderer to capture a painless lethal injection?

It adjectives depends on what side you are looking at it from.
I think you're right.
Surgery really causes cramp, but if we're unconsious, we're not feeling it, and by the mode, they also give the individual pain murderer.

What IS interesting, is to watch how peoples own ideology will effect their logic surrounded by these situations.
In other words, you can see how someone (your teacher, for instance, or possibly your classmates) have a preconceived view of whether or not it is a moral thing to do, consequently they will skew their logic to support their preconceived idea, even if it's a ridiculous stretch of logic.

Using their logic, it's "cruel and unusual" to get something done ANY surgeries under common anesthetic.
If the inmate is guilty, I frankly don't care if they discern the pain or not. It may nouns cruel, but they caused agony to someone else. (Death is punishment for a capital crime, which is almost other murder)

I do feel, however, that you're right. They are made to travel unconcious so they don't feel the stomach-ache. It doesn't register in their minds. That's why they do it that method.




http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...
You are correct, there is no misery associated with noxious injections.

That doesn't stop bleeding-heart liberals from trying to make up their own "facts" to try and stop it, though.

Personally, I presume they should do away with fatal injection entirely and go subsidise to hanging & firing squads as a principle way of executions. Especially people who torture & assassinate others - why should they have a nice, flowing drift off to sleep? Give them for a time taste of their own tablets.
I think everybody have a right to his/her own stupid opinion and yours is no stupider than mine , Teach's or anbody else's.

Why? because none of the above opinion matter one whit unless the opinioned group can effect the death penulty law.
it this case i concur near you. but only within this case. apply this supposition to most other subjects.

my conclusion: lethal injection cause the inmate physical pain but not mental misery. (besides they'll be dead)
You have a vastly interesting theory. Very though provoking.

I don't know the answers to it ... but it is something that associates should be aware of .. and worth looking in to.
The problem is that one of the injections cause paralysis and once a person is paralyzed they can't show misery.

If I remember they give you.

1. Tranquilizer (valium or versed}
2. Sedative. This puts you out but you will wake up up if you experience pain
3. Paralyzing agent. If you grain pain you can't move or speak
4. Copper Sulfate.

If it is to be painless.

1. You must enjoy a lot of sleeping pill
2. They have to lurk until the sedative is working fully.
3. If you are really sedated they can paralyze you.
4. Now they can butcher you with the copper sulfate.

The timing is critical and respectively stage must have a sufficient dose of the required drug plus time to work.

In the worst baggage the condemned is paralyzed but still able to get the impression pain.
********************
Mande957
When you are given anesthesia within a hospital it's very similar to noxious injecting. First they put you to sleep. Second, the paralyze you. Without the paralyzing drugs you would jump rotten the table as soon as the scalpel hit your skin.
I think that possibly you could outstandingly well be right, and the reality that you sat and thought going on for it before coming to your conclusion from personal experince if truth be told gives credence to your conclusion. I believe one and the same thing myself. I will not state if I am for or against it. I hold seen both sides of the barrier and understand those who agree and disagree, but I do believe that you are highly thoughtful and I hope more people will "think" also formerly coming to a conslusion.
Kudos.
i feel if they know 100% the personage did the crime and it was a execute kind or child crime next who should care if they discern it they did not care of the victims affliction. so let them have a feeling it and show how it hurts. but if there is dout they did it prison is better. i touch you should pay near your own life if you took a vivacity. a child life is so precous to God i assume he don't care how much strain you get too. the closes piece to God is a child. so give them the twinge. and think of it man justest.good luck
What you are missing is that doctors are not permitted to assist in executions and society who do participate are not as capably trained as anesthesiolgsts. As a result, the drugs are often inappropriately administered. Imagine having a hospital orderly (instead of a doctor) administer anesthesia during an operation.

The toxic injection cocktail has be banned as a opening to euthanize animals. Unless enough of the drug to craft the condemned unconscious is given, correctly, the condemned party can wake up and quality the excrutiating pain of the later drug. But because of the paralytic drug, the condemned cannot move or cry out so that no one else realize this.
Well r ya ???

Are global lottery prize is indisputable prize?what about affidavite and (unodc) fees they involve to claim my prize?

i receved email from so called worldwide lottery in london informed me that my email won us$300000USD surrounded by a bonus draw of this year 2007 . to claim my prize they asked me a fee us$2000USD for affedavit sworen and i rewarded. then asked for a excise of us $40000USD to opening international sandbank account and i rewarded.now they asking for a ceritificate from cohesive nation office on drugs and crime beside fee us $250000USD to verbs the prize to my countery. i can not know if it is real or jock me?i can not foot this fee.if it is existing how we solve this problem? if not how return pay for my fees paid (us$60000USA ) to them?
Answers: Scam. Bull scat. immediately scram. you are blocking the way. delete adjectives such bogus message. spam. never respond. tricks and lies. waste of time.
adjectives a bunch of hogwash.

They make money from dupes by claiming they can enjoy $30,000,000 by sending in the fees.

Think again.
You are a prime example of my stupidity because I used to assume that people be smart-ish, but I have literary my lesson. Where money is concerned all anyone have to do is dangle a carrot, and morons and greedy bastards bite.
I'm sorry that you have lost your change but maybe the subsequent time that you see a number followed by zero's and you haven't actually enter any competition you will think.
you hold been ripped bad for $6,000 or $60,000 .. you should have asked this since your eyes wee blinded with money.

within is no way to bring back your money back. and by niow they enjoy all you finacial information. you will soon swot up just how honourable they are at getting loans and buying items you will be held responsible for.

you credit is about to move about very fruitless. you fell for a scam. and now you own lost. never do it again, you must delete all of these emails as soon as you draw from them

i an sorry for you and i wish you the best and right luck. your going to need it

More Questions and Answers:
[2326] - [1651] - [501] - [124] - [1868] - [1783] - [2434] - [2061] - [346] - [2258] - [1123] - [1834] - [1070] - [115] - [773] - [1215] - [1727] - [1235] - [2424] - [2297]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: