Law Questions and Answers
What could happen if a minor is caught selling adderall?
My friend is person an idiot and wants to market his adderall. What are the consequences if he gets caught?Answers: He'll most expected be treated along the same lines as somebody selling weed, especially if it's a first offense. He really should be punished further because he's giving a drug that may enjoy serious side effects in some those (ie. they take something already that will interact or within are contraindications for that person to use it). But for a first offense I don't judge this will be the case. He is human being a complete idiot though - because if someone takes it and dies or get seriously ill he will be to some extent responsbile which can then amenable a lot of penalty. This really is stupid. I almost wish he be selling weed instead.
He'll get convicted of a felony, and might even be tried as an mature. He'll have to wages a few thousand in fines and WILL spend time within prison.
What values do pharmacists bring to improve society’s welfare?
Answers: Give the right medicine is the only duty that pharmacists must do to contribute to the society.
Well, they clear a lot of money bad people buying drugs so their wages and incomes are tax appropriately and the tax money go into social programs.
Recording Copyright Enquiry?
Years ago I sang a song for a movie and it be recorded into a soundtrack compact disc album with my autograph in it, and it's also broadcasted adjectives over the cinemas, TV and radio. I was not offered to sign any contract or aggreement formerly that. Am i rightfully supposed to own a copyright for the song? I feel that i've be used by the record company similar to a moron. Legal experts out there please big-heartedly advise. Thanks a million!Answers: the composers of songs carry copyrights not singers.
if you were salaried by the producers for your singing then you don't own much of a claim, especially without a contract. some singers near contracts are able to claim new royalty if the producers re-use their work product for other purposes not covered in the contract.
if you did more than sing the song, you also composed the lyrics and music, next you certainly do enjoy a claim but it is late surrounded by the day to try and give somebody a lift back rights. if you go to court most likely the producers will claim they have a verbal "work for hire" agreement.
I cannot take responsibility for others whereabouts, right?
If I do something to someone, what they do back to me is not my responsibility or quirk. Correct? And this is true no matter what be done, right? This does not include the responsibility one takes as a parent or guardian. Am I lone at fault for what I do? Am I to have a feeling guilty for what someone says I "made" them do?This quiz is brought to you by bad decision.
Answers: Not necessarily. If you hit me in the frontage, I will hit you back and that will be your denounce.
If the person wise saying you made them do something can prove coercion, then yes YOU can be held in charge for what they did.
Stating "I'm gong to kill your dog if you don't break into that house" is coercion
It would depend on what whether or not it would be considered a logical response to your actions.
For example, if you be to call someone a moron, and they turned around and started smashing someones coup¨¦ with a bat out of anger. That would not be a temperate response to your insult.
However, if you were to punch someone surrounded by the back of the manager and make it look approaching someone else did resulting in the two other culture getting into a fight. You would be properly responsible for any damage that be caused by the scrap because it was modest to expect that it would cause a come to blows between the two people.
You would also inevitability to take your wisdom of the person's character into consideration. For example, if you enjoy witnessed that person respond surrounded by an excessive way to a expert situation before, putting them into that situation intentional in your segment you would be responsible for them responding in that same passageway again.
So to take the first example, if you have seen the human being respond to an insult with extreme wildness and then insulted that personality again "taunting" them into that rage you could be responsible for his activities. The case simply comes down to how much you could expect the reaction you get.
So in short, no, you are VERY promising to be responsible for another person's actions if the appointments were a result of something you did.
If you do or read aloud something to someone else and they retaliate right then, consequently it is your fault.
My mother-in-law?
I left my children next to my mother-in-law for the weekend to babsit. I mentioned to her that I was glad that I individual saw my children in the evening and not during the daytime (I work during the day). She told me that I had no values. Do you mull over she was a ***** to speak that?Answers: OMG WOMAN U NEED HELP BADLY! THESE CHILDREN SHOULD BE THE HIGHLIGHT OF YOUR DAY, NOT THE FACT THAT U DONT SEE THEM! PLEASE DO SOMETHING TO GET HELP, IM SCARED FOR YOUR CHILDREN, THEY NEED LOVE
I can't believe that you'd say something so rude going on for your own children. You don't want to see them during the day say that you don't like to spend time near them or even love them. Makes you seem approaching a bad mother.
I spend 24/7 next to my son whenever I can.
without a doubt she be a ***** to say that. Who does she muse she is? So, just because you are a full time parent next to a career, doing your best to provide for your children and furnish them a good go, you don't deserve a break? Tell her to watch her chief on the doorframe. It must be really hard for her to save carting that "best mother of adjectives eternity" award on her chest, that thing must weigh a TON!!
Mother within Laws. oh, I can't wait till mine's an EX!!! you can never please them, and you will other be in the wrong next to them. I'm going to be one of those monther in law that every married couple loves to have:... near in a pinch, and will facilitate with a smile, but doesn't bring involved!!!
You made an error in judgement next to your choice of words. You may want to clarify with her near something like a comparison to work at home moms and how do they do it near distractions and you feel you do better at your occupation job near out worrying about the children.
But .. most loving mothers touch guilty about working and shuffling children to babysitters and would love to be home if they could afford to.so i.e. why your Mother in Law said what she did. She is from another classmates of stay at home mothers and you need to straighten this out if not you will have a bumpy road ahead surrounded by your relationship with her.
I hope you realize that your mother contained by law babe-in-arms sitting for you is a big deal. You can make tracks your children with someone you trust. Not adjectives mother in law will babysit or even spend time with here grandchildren. Please do not take for granted that she is expected to survey your children.
As far as the comment you made it was indecorous to say that to her. Even though it's easier to progress to work then appropriate care of a child and most involve 2 incomes your comment was superfluous to say to the woman who is giving you free morning care.
Do you thinking Marijuana should be legalized with a license?
Like, influence there be a smoking license?Marijuana is illegal because it is deadly to our health and benefit, correct?
Well so is driving.
But we can do it anyway, provided we know the rules of the road and the risks we are taking with our lives and the lives of others.
So utter someone wanted to legitimately smoke marijuana, well they could. If they took a Marijuana Education Course and bookish the facts, the good and doomed to failure, the hazards and risks. And if nearby were restrictions, similar to age-wise.
In fact, I construe a course like that might gross people establish to stop smoking marijuana. Or atleast keep idiots from doing it.
Answers: Marijuana should be legitimate, with or in need a license. There's no logical reason why alcohol is officially recognized, and weed isn't. I ask people adjectives the time, who would you rather run into walking down the street at hours of darkness, a group of drunks, or a group of stoners? No one says drunks. Drunks can be looking for fight, stoners are looking for cookies.
You know what your never going to hear? A woman saying that her husband is a nice guy, but when he smokes pot, he comes home and beat me. Alcohol is far more dangerous consequently marijuana, and not just for the user.
P.S. to Fox9, You requirement a bong hit more then the rest of us. Marijuana have a 100% fatality rate? I think you've see Reefer Madness one too many times. That or your still suffering from the anti-drug brainwashing you received surrounded by grammar college. You really want to know what has a 100% fatality rate? Your not going to similar to the answer. It's life. As they said surrounded by Fight Club, "Given a long enough time vein, everyone's survival rate drops to zero."
Abiogeek2, Well said.
it is legitimate with a stamp to be exact simply never issued out. if you don't have the stamp, it's private. if you do then you can grow it (remember the colonial tea stamps and such?) and consume small quantity. thing is that not a soul will ever be issued that stamp and by asking for one you are incriminating yourself (violates the 5th amendment) thus was overturned contained by 1970. The commonly accepted motivation for all of this is that the Mexican immigrant workers be 'scary' and used to smoke so a good means of access to control them was to dance for their favorite pasttime.
** who the hell would thumbs-down me when I'm right?
This issue was knock down by the Supreme Court even after they say it should be legalized for Medical use.
The U.S. is unawares for it yet, but they will be by the year 2050 save sooner.
The government is constantly borrowing money and sooner or subsequently the bank breaks surrounded by half. A Bankrupt Government?, could be? I don`t know? or perhaps slightly?
In the years to come to answer for Social Security concerns amongst the most crucial one right in a minute in deliberate Marijuana will soon be legal within the U.S. and you can go to the store and buy you some definite weed.
The scenario is this> Democrats are for higher rearing and hitting on the small village or private sector to buoy and help children gain the best education possible by furthering their skills and shooting into College.
This would be set to a more stronger and healthier society contained by the years to come ahead and that would put more responsible people contained by the positions to fill the spaces where on earth we rely on foreign coutry's to fill them for us.
That would take home Marijuana legal because the generation to come will be smarter and wiser as America takes a 360 amount turn around where Tobaco company's enjoy already been hit sturdy by the justice system because it's a true certainty that Marijuana is less unsafe than cigarettes and that's a proven fact.
Cigarettes will budge out the door and the new cigarette for America will be homegrown.
The enconomy will pick up because food sale will rise. People will spend more money smoking weed and that will help our deficit.
Think more or less it, marijuana is the key answer to our financial debts.
We are building up the children contained by Schools today to a higher standard than when we be in School contained by our days during recess and crap.
This is a integral new social group of children being qualified and bred to be the new leaders for tomorrow...go and get my drift?
Think about it. Out next to the old leaders and contained by with the latest ones and they are our childtren today right now smoking blunts.:):):).and contained by College...give me a thumb up AMERICA>!!!
You gotta love that pothead logic.
If they ever did issue pot license, they would have to bring in the use of birth control during sex a requirement. We don't want you idiots breeding.
As my friend chucky would say..
**** YES!
I'm audible range more rallying cries to reshuffle the war on drugs, and I chew over that at least reducing the number of citizens who are deemed criminals for smoking marijuana is at the forefront of the discussion. Even the just one who's passionate in the region of it is angry old Mike Gravel, at tiniest a lot of population are re-thinking our laws.
Personally I focus any adult should be capable of do whatever they want to their own body next to no government interference. If you're not hurting anyone else it should not be the government's declaration.
I think marijuana should be legally recognized for everyone. First, to clarify, I do NOT smoke marijuana or take any other unconstitutional narcotic for that matter. Now, I do drink alcohol, and smoke cigarettes, both of which verbs one's health. Both are without fault legal. Let's cut the crap afterwards, the government doesn't impart a damn about our form. They let corporations dump pullution into our river, air, and food. They really could hand over a damn, to them it's just a number's team game. Now, let's get to the TRUE reason Marijuana, Crack, Heroin, and anything other drug you that happens to be off the record, are illegal to get going with. The root is, Merck, Eli Lilly, or Pfizer don't hold the patent on them. The drug companies don't control the flea market, so they are illegal. Meanwhile, Oxycodone and Morphine are permitted (though strictly controlled for the most part). This my friends is called hypocrisy. Fact of the situation is, our government be never charged with function of protecting an individual from themself. Freedom, while wonderful, surrounded by the hands of those minus self control will sometimes lead to destruction. We inevitability to learn to adopt that. You can not save someone that requests to destroy their energy doing drugs, yet we spend billions on policing these folks up, putting them in jail (where they eat better than we do, own cable, and nice warm beds), and agree to them out to start the whole cycle over again. STUPID. The time of war on drugs is a complete failure, and we call for to just stop, and consent to these people eradicate themselves via heroin in the eye. That is FREEDOM after adjectives.
How to get Income Tax Assessment Order?
Hi,How do I return with an "Income Tax Assessment Order" ? I need it for my passport address proof.
Thanks contained by advance
Regards,
Gaurav Kadyan
PS: please reply if you know Indian Laws.
Answers: Income Tax Assessment demand is not the only address proof for passport. You can also use these as proof of address :- ration card, licence from Employer of reputed companies on letter cranium, water /telephone /electricity bill/statement of running hill account/Income Tax Assessment Order /Election Commission ID card, Gas connection Bill, Spouse’s passport copy, parent’s passport copy contained by case of minors. (NOTE: If any applicant submits one and only ration card as proof of address, it should be accompanied by an additional proof of address out of the above categories). As far getting Income Tax Assessment Order you have to profile your Income tax return for the final financial/fiscal/accounting year in the Income Tax ward/district where on earth you reside & work.
Jury Duty!?
Ive been call to do jury duty starting from monday. I dont think at hand is anyway i can get out of it. How long will I be in that and what can I expect to happen?Answers: I be only at mine 3 days. I thought it be quite a innovative experience and thought I learnt a disinterested bit from it. It's nothing to verbs about, relax and soak up it.
Of course you can't "get out of it". It's your DUTY. If you be on trial, you'd want to be judged by 12 monotonous people wouldn't you? Well that's what you're individual told - not asked - to do, for someone else.
You will spend a lot of time sitting around, you might grasp called to be on a jury, you might not. Then keep hold of your wits about you, listen scarcely to all the evidence and wish whether the person is guilty or not.
I can't believe this place sometimes.
You may be within just for vVoir Dire. ["Voir Dire is the process by which [U.S.] attorneys select, or probably more appropriately reject, certain jurors to hear a suitcase."] I have be called twice for jury duty and be excused both times after a morning of being within the courthouse for Voir Dire.
If you are selected to serve on a jury, all along time of service depends on the trial. Some trials will last a time or two, and some can last weeks.
Depends on the satchel, and if you actually procure selected to serve or not.
It's in actuality pretty interesting to serve on a jury. I did it this year and really learned alot something like our criminal justice system. I wouldn't mind doing it again sometime.
around two weeks in broad, it can be a bit boring lots of sitting around, you get given tokens to aid pay for the food within their canteen?
It depends on where you live. Didn't they dispatch you something, telling you what to expect? I've have jury duty twice in different counties. The experiences be very different. For one of them, I didn't enjoy to go at adjectives! We were to call upon the night in the past each daylight of duty to see if we had to come surrounded by. I never did. For the other one, I had to run every day and all along time varied. If you carry sent to selection, you'll know how to stay bad the panel.
No way to win out of it, it is really dependant on what case you will enjoy to hear, to the length of time you will hold to serve. If you are lucky you might not even be chosen to be on one of the cases...
It is a duty of all citizens on the electoral register beside very few exceptions to be available for jury service.
I don't want to do it is newly as bad as aphorism the punishment isn't enough or, why wasn't that party found guilty.
Do the duty or else do not moan going on for our legal system.
When I did Jury Service contained by England several years ago, normal service is 2 weeks, unless you are already module of a Jury for a trial, in which grip you will be on the Jury until a verdict have been agreed.
In my experience I be only near for a week then be contacted by the Court Service to say here were not ample trials so did not need to attend.
What can you expect:
On your first daylight, you will be shown around the courts and shown where you will be sitting as jurors. You may be shown a video of what the procedures are (i.e. reading of an oath) You will after be taken to the juror waiting room, where near will be a large group of associates on Jury Service.
You wait until your label is called up (this is erratic and not pre determined). You might want to take a book (don't bring an iPod, as you will not hear your name call out)
If your name is call, the clerk will take you to the court beside 14 others.
In court will be the judge, the defendant, and prosecuting and defending barristers and their assistants and other court officer. There may also be people surrounded by the public gallery.
Once in court, another court officer will send for out 12 names at all over the place which you say yes if your identify is called. You will next walk to the jurors benches. If your identify is not called, you will be sent fund to the juror waiting room.
As a juror, you will be asked to take an oath, after you will remain seated and listen to the facts that the barristers will tell you. First from the prosecution barrister (sitting furthest away from you) next from the defence barrister (sitting closest to you) You will also hear from a range of witnesses (not necessarily eye witnesses, but sometimes expert witnesses and police officers)
At various times you may be asked to donate the court while barristers assess a point of law. A clerk will pinch you to and from the court at this point, to the juror debating chamber.
After the facts have be presented to you, you will then hear the closing statements from respectively barrister. After which you will then be briefed by the referee and sent to the juror debating chamber, where you and your 11 colleagues come to a edict for if the defendant is guilty or not guilty.
You will also need to discuss who is to be foreman, who read out the verdict contained by court when asked. You will not be asked to make a sentence, as this is base on judicial precedent.
Overall, I found the experience to be fascinating and will merrily take sector again if asked.
I hope that this helps.
P.S Perhaps you could extend your information to articulate which country you are from?
basically if you bring the answer wrong i.e. you sent an innocent man to jail or consent to a guilty man go free you will be sent to prison by the adjudicate. expect to have repercussions, if you dispatch a drug dealer down he will transport his homies round to get revenge. by doing this jury service u will sign ur duration away
My older brother who lives in the order of a mile from us bought my fiance' a battery operate "TOY" ??
My older brother who used to be busy to my fiance' sent her a battery operate " TOY " for Christmas. My mom stole all of her play TOYS she have recieved from him the past 2 years. Could my fiance' press charges against my mom ? Would I have need of to get a attorney to represent my fiance' in civil court ?Answers: I would be more worried in the order of wether your brother was getting it on next to your fiance.
Sis should just buy her mom indistinguishable toys before she can steal them
Waste the stupid court system on something else.
How is your mom stealing your fiance's "toys" unless you adjectives live in equal house? Or maybe even indistinguishable room. Wait, maybe your nouns is your sister...
You could take her to small claims court but next she might throw the two of you out of the house.
Call Jerry Springer!! He'd love to here your case.
What are the Indian cleanliness standards with regard to paprika export?
first the Indian standard requirements for Paprika and secondary as compared to the USA and European cleanliness standards. as far as point and safety issues are concerned.Answers: For the export of spices and spice products, the exporting countries hold to comply with the specifications laid down by the regulatory agencies surrounded by importing countries. Before the liberalisation, exporters have to comply with the pre-shipment inspection and aspect control as per the AGMARK Grade Specification prescribed by the Directorate of Marketing and Inspection (DMI). Export Inspection Agency, under the Export Inspection Council of India, also enjoy the mandate for pre-shipment inspection and quality control credentials. With the liberalization pre-shipment inspection and quality control be withdrawn and the exporters are free to export the spices and spice products as per the specifications prescribed by the importing countries.
For Paprika Powder, the European Spice Association (ESA) Quality Minima are as follows: -
ASH % W/W MAX - 10
AIA % W/W MAX - 2
H2O% W/W MAX - 11
Please refer to the following methods when analysing products:
Moisture - ISO 939
Total Ash - ISO 928
Acid Insoluble Ash - ISO 930
For more details: mail@indianspices.com
More Questions and Answers:
[1369] - [543] - [351] - [1869] - [2356] - [1458] - [610] - [208] - [139] - [86] - [1090] - [315] - [1428] - [2321] - [15] - [1227] - [1127] - [1939] - [1592] - [2192]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: