Law Questions and Answers

Should I be mad? My ex and I go back to court I quality so stupid!?

I took him in because he bullys me and he is within contempt of court for not letting me see our kids, they told me that I couldnt with hold support so he couldnt next to hold the kids and if he did I would still have to pay packet the support, I understand that. However He waive the right of support away. but then asked for it, I am angry that I go in asking for thier comfort, and I walked away next to them saying I would agree to the kids choose to visit and next to less visitation as originally asked and I enjoy to pay the child support, It not that I am angry going on for the support but I am angry that they act as if I should be positive about what I get! My hubby doesnt understand my frustrations in the region of it and now we are aggression I feel desperate and hurt all the passageway around. Any advise?

Answers: What is wrong next to you, that the courts gave your kids to your ex-husband? Kids usually move about with the mother, even if she's incompetent.

If your ex waive the child support, then you don't hold to pay, unless the court information you to. Visitation is another matter entirely. You hold to talk to the arbiter about that, too.

This is how I ruminate child custody should be handled:

The kids gain the house. Mom lives there for a week, later goes home to her apartment, while Dad lives here for a week.

It's always the children who suffer, but now and then is it their fault that the conjugal failed.

By the path, maybe the pass judgment took away your kids because you wouldn't be able to give support to them with their English sentence structure or spelling homework.

Here is an article called "How to Find Legal Help When You Can't Afford It" - it list links to legal information and official assistance in every state.

http://www.courtreference.com/court-refe...

I suggest you aim legal direction.

I don't really understand your grill. Is the situation that your ex husband has custody of the kids, you enjoy visitation rights and have to earnings child support to him, and he bullies you? How did he get custody, within the first place? How old are your children? He shouldn't enjoy been competent to bully you and keep the kids away from you, if within is nothing wrong near your home environment.

Is the recently released omnibus appropriations Act titled H.R. 2764? If not, where on earth can if find the text?

Answers: Are you sure you want to? The short newspaper is 1,443 pages long, and the final performance is 3,417 pages long. Members of Congress have 46 hours and 8 minutes to read it, along with 10 other bills.

Can you do that?

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c1...

How is that legal?

A magistrate on duty to compel a example of my breath or blood? The sample recieved would be base entirely on the officer's word, in the officer's custody, and it's not difficult to contaminate a example.

DUI is a serious problem, but I'd really rather not walk to jail because of a cup of grandma's eggnog and a fumbled CD.

Isn't this a serious Fifth Amendment infringement? I realize that driving is a right, instead of a privilege, and I respect that. Do I really need to own a cop's word generating a warrant for a token he could easily tamper beside, when I've already got cops order people to sign blank tickets or be in motion to jail?

At what point does this give the impression of being excessive? At what point does compelling me to provide evidence against myself seem excessive?

Having see cops pull over everything moving on an interstate, and claim it wasn't a sobriety checkpoint, I'm starting to achieve a little worried.

Answers: It is excessive. Don't believe for a second that of late because it is written down somewhere that you have rights, that you in truth do.

Police can basically violate your rights if they discern like it because of loopholes which distribute them "probable cause," and such. My guidance is to avoid them entirely. Don't try to talk your method out of anything, because if they don't like you, they will try to screw you over even more, and they can.

I know it isn't right to allow the college drop outs that become police officer in small towns to run the show, but thats how the system works and near is no changing it.

Unless you can afford a honourable lawyer. If you are rich don't verbs about law, you are above them.

You operate a motor vehicle according to the rules of the state and you accept those rules. There is no constitutional right to operate a motor vehicle.

Having problems with my fresh employer not paying me my full paycheck?

I live in calif. and my tentative employer has singular been paying me more or less half of my check on the designated payday and later about a week latter they finally pay the rest, i am getting physical tired of not being payed contained by a timly manner resembling all the rest of the workers , is there anything i can do to engender them fix this problem?

Answers: Look in your phone book. Find the phone number for the California Department of Labor.

Call them.they'll set him straight within a hurry.

Complain to the BBB, and the DA...and then start looking for a investigational job on your opening out of the country.

Should we be forced to pay taxes to fund an forbidden war?

Answers: the those are already forgetting that the war contained by Iraq.was started by wrong intelligent reports.that surrounded by itself should of made this war iffy from the start.and the longer this war go on.the more people are going to forget that we never should of stayed over nearby for so long.people enjoy short memories.i don;t think we should be forced to support the time of war with our export tax dollars.but there are closely of young men, and women, over nearby that count on us back here to support them.i;am against the period of war for sure.but the American soldiers are only doing what their asked to do by their establishment.because you are against the war,don;t embezzle it out on our american forces.they need our support.but again i;am against the period of war as well.

Dumbo, seize over it. The war be, and continues to be, legal.

Pay your taxes and shut up. All you do is put together people angry.

What's your definition of "private war", because if it depends upon the U.N.'s sanctioning it, your definition is not officially recognized itself.

For the U.S. to go to time of war, the president only requirements congressional approval which he got. For a moral exoneration, the war entail only involve toppling a corrupt regime, which it did.

What happens to a human being when his law license is suspended?

Last darkness I found out that my boyfriend had his regulation license suspended for a year for lying under oath. He apparently have a gambling problem during/as result of his divorce. He lost his duty and custody of his kids. He and the children have adjectives since moved to another state.
I'm not sure how I should feel or take action about this not long found information. We've been dating for nine months; he should enjoy told me about this. I have a feeling as if I have be lied to the entire time.
Is this a big deal or should I tolerate it go? I love him, but no longer trust him.

Answers: To answer your sound out directly, he can no longer work as a lawyer until his shaft license is re-instated. Since he was suspended, not disbarred, he will be capable of practice as an attorney again if he meets the conditions that be imposed on him when he was suspended. Is it a big operation? Yes. He is not unemployable however. He can find a good livelihood as a paralegal or perhaps surrounded by a business that has little concern give or take a few ethics. However, your interview concerns me for a couple of reasons. Why did he a short time ago tell you this? Also, if he be suspended, there are clearly things he must do to get his license back--probably including counseling and/or Gamblers Anonymous. I cross-question whether he can be doing these things without your ease. Addiction is a disease and I'm not hearing anything from you that make me know he is addressing the problem. So-what is he doing to carry his license back? If he's working a program, you MAY know how to trust him again. These programs require radical honesty. I'm not audible range that he has that from your statements.

What happen? He now lacks authority to practice regulation.

Oh, one doesn't have a making a bet problem "as a result of" divorce. That's just BS. He gamble, he got surrounded by over his head, and nobody made him.

Evidently he hasn't well-read from his dishonesty, either.

RUN. What's he going to do to prove he have changed? Promise? What is that worth?

what do you think they do. they run for political bureau.Washington is filled next to people similar to that.another reason why our country is so screwed up.lawyer will promise you anything just to procure your money.if you ;re smart, you;ll forget him and get on beside your life.he;ll probably start stealing money from family next to support his laying a bet habit.

Is this case a form of persecution??

Hi, im kristian talam from cebu. I would like to ask lend a hand regarding this situation as follows;
1. The lessor forced us to go the house without giving us ample time to pack our things and does not inform us later than the time he considered necessary us to move out.
2. We were call up through the barangay for a agreement about the rental and the lessor gain favor because of the majority officials know him.
3. The lessor pays the water bill and ask a character to get the meter by proverb that the house does not have lessee anymore
but unluckily was stop because they be caught.
4. The lessee destroys the fence of the house front and side because of unknown aim. Maybe just a path for us to suffer. It happen right this december 23,2007.

I would close to to ask for a legal proposal because I could no longer bear to see my father and mother undergone to protect our property as a lessee and as their children.
Thank you so much.. Godbless!!

Answers: profile a case seeking undying Injunction.

What are you talking give or take a few? I can not understand what your beef is?

In the spirit of our pre-emptive strike philosophy I am ok in doing this?

I ponder my neighbor is seeking to obtain education of a way to impair me.

In the spirit of our aggresive mindset , would I be justified within executing a "pre-emptive strike" to stop this evil neighbor from attempting to find the "means" to harm me?

Answers: If you are the main power in your commune, and will brook no challenge, yes. Especially if he have a lot of strange religious design about a coming apocalypse, dresses formally on constant days, prays a lot etc.

Shouldnt we kill prisoners?

i suggest the really really nasty ones. the ones who committed murder get to jail and continued murdering. i view lock up and the other prison shows and it never cease to amaze me that america can know exactly what go on in prison but choose to agree to them b@$t@rd$ live. they are in nearby dealing drugs, raping, killing and attacking the staff but its zilch noone can do. why not kill them! they would shoot you. it makes sense. specially the gang, every gang member contained by or out of jail requirements to be killed. why tolerate the schedule of people who could tactless about the rules. and dont make available me that all existence is precious crap cause while you would clich�� that they would be kill someone you love over nought at all. plus if they know that you go to prison you automatically die i bet the crime rate would drop. not everyone would die but you know the ones who would. what say aloud you Y.A.

Answers: to be honest yes.i don't think we really enjoy a choice...if criminals know that they're only punishment is duration in prison...to some that isn't punishment.some it isn't going to issue..some people be aware of they have rights and i guess as a human they do...but contained by turn should they be allowed tv's pool tables...seeing others every light of day...books ..education..it is a greatly hard subject and i guess unless one have a family branch in that situation we really can't answer for sure.

Yes

i totally agree near you

The punishment should fit the crime.

I don't believe in the departure penalty, but I don't believe these animals contained by prison who commit certain and heinous crimes of torture and murder and sex crimes against children, should never see the feathery of day again.

They should be locked surrounded by dark cold cell and never let out at adjectives, ever and no books, no tv, no internet, no writing "how I did it had I done it books". What drivel.

These known and proven criminals (Paul Bernardo, Charles Manson, etc.)

They deserve to be alone beside their own conscience until they just drop deceased frankly. They are treated much too good as it is within prison, much better than they deserve. How can they possibly be alone to ponder their sins when they get everything they want to intervene the time and time to stretch their legs too? No way. If they somehow survive, they will be so broken they will never hold the capacity to hurt another soul.

The best deterrent is knowing you will be sent to a sure and slow tortuous passing. Don't want to do the time, then don't do the crime.

The problem is they are adjectives mixed together and they should be jailed according to their crimes and the severity and if that means shipping them to serve their time 1000 miles away so be it. Prisons should be built according to the crimes.

Should the Blackwater security company be hired to enforce American law here in the US?

By hiring a private shelter firm, the whitehouse could sidestep the Constitution (just as it has the Geneva convention abroad).

I focus it's a great idea myself, who wants due process, anyway.

Answers: Only if we want to continue reverting to a facist state.

Yes, you nouns like a great American.

I know you must be proud of your Speaker of the House.

The precipitate police forces were simply a group of tough but honest men hired by adjectives a City's taxpayers to enforce the laws. Watch a cowboy movie beside a sherriff in it.
So, I approaching your idea. If directive enforcement were a everyday business, it would become efficient.
But if nation's senate hired a huge firm of thugs to enforce unpopular laws, we would bring back a praetorian guard, like surrounded by the days of Ancient Rome, with adjectives the consequent evils.
So, I suggest directly elected and paid local police, and a lesser amount of Feds.

I agree with the concluding user on ancient Rome. Having a private security company responsible for us is an issue. You are maxim its the federal government respnsibility to save our peace, which yes is true, however, it is also the responsibility of the people to nouns against the government when they are opressed as what happen in the American Revolution and Civil War. If this happen, it would not be hard to envisage that the National Guard of the states will be in a time of war against the private security companies to stroke in the interest of what the relatives want and not what the government requests.

More Questions and Answers:
[1291] - [867] - [173] - [2117] - [2271] - [588] - [71] - [1656] - [862] - [2437] - [863] - [2114] - [2315] - [1139] - [2460] - [1097] - [594] - [1114] - [1703] - [1302]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: