Law Questions and Answers

What type of education must I take in directive to become a prison inmate counselor?


Answers: msw, masters in social work
licensed clinical social worker (certification)
which manner undergrad in probably psychology after
master's in social work.

How does one go around suing a college for not providing proper education?

I started a medical transcription course beside PCDI back contained by May of 2006. They were bought out by Ashworth University surrounded by August of 2007. Up until they changed management, adjectives was going ably. However, when they did, my tests started coming up missing, and grade became really inaccurate. They even give me a phantom grade one time. You know, erstwhile me for a test that they never recieved. Anytime I contact the institution with question about grades, or why my test haven't been grade yet,(they are never on the time that be agreed to), I automatically fail. I hold tests where on earth I virtually changed nothing after a backfire, and I did worse on the retake than I did on the origional. I have in actuality had a professional transcriber look at them, and she couldn't find any problems. Not to mention, they are massively rude any time I call. I am worried give or take a few the ones I passed, becaused I'm not sure I actually passed them. The college is located contained by Norcross, GA. I want to sue for time and money lost.
Answers: PCDI is a very deficient school. I am contacted weekly by former students who can not find work and who have complained roughly the education they submit. Many employers will not even consent to graduates from PCDI trial for employment.

I'm sorry to hear that you are unhappy beside them, but it seems to be pretty adjectives. I would contact a lawyer to see what your rights are. You can also folder a complaint with the Better Business Bureau, requesting a compensation. I would also file a complaint anywhere and everywhere else you can, such as next to the accreditation departments (their is a list on their website), the federal trade commission, etc.

When and if you want to go wager on to school, choosing a proper institution is very historic.

Most employers require experience or association in one of the top AHDI approved school. If your looking into Medical Transcription pay the extra surrounded by tuition to attend an 'approved' school. Attending any other conservatory would be a waste of your time and money. Many culture have received training through scarce programs only to find out that they are inept to find a job. AHDI sets the standards for MT courses. Employers know that old pupils of these 'approved' courses have gain the skills necessary to switch on their career as an MT.

Check out: http:// mteducationonline. com (remove the spaces). It is an affiliate site for Career Step. I attended Career Step and recieved a position (at-home) less than a week after graduate. Career Step is an AHDI approved program and they are partnered with plentiful of the major MT employer. In other words, their graduates gain the jobs. Many companies require 2-3 years experience, however, greatly of these companies will waive this requirement if you graduate from the right school.

I recommend CS because they are partnered next to MANY employers, self-paced (you can finish contained by a few months or take as long as over a year or two), and more affordable than the other top 2 courses.

Attending your local community college will afford you a good casual at a job in-house, but if you are wanting to work from home, an online 'approved' course is the means of access to go.
They do propose financial aid and payment plans. :)

------ AHDI is the Association for Healthcare Documentation Integrity (formerly agreed as the American Association for Medical Transcription).

It is possible to work at-home as an MT, but chosing the right school is SO defining!


Good luck! If you have any question, feel free to e-mail me.
are they attributed?
if so contact the accrediting body
contact better business bureau
as far as suing them i don't know if i.e. possible unless they failed to provide you near a service you paid for.
you could contact an attorney but don't seize your hopes up.
you will get more attention from them if nearby accreditation is questioned and the BBB is investigating them.
> 800.00 that I didn't enjoy, I would have go to a proper University

Uh.. I think if you be paying attention from level school through college, you would not enjoy ended up at such a academy, and if you think a "proper University" will educate you for more then a week on $800, you really necessitate a reality check.

Do I have a valise to sue?


Answers: Do research and I'd take it to small claims court. In America you are competent to sue for just roughly speaking anything. At the very tiniest you'll be able to return with something for the comment she made-which was out of strip.
In America, you can sue anybody for anything. Yes you have a legitamate overnight case, your best option is to hold her to small claims court. Here you will not need a advocate.

Both of you will have an opportunity to explain your story to the trendsetter. Bring all of your evidence to prove your grip.
It is a great case for Civil small claims court. At lowest the price of the pants the alteration costs, and the court fees. Make sure you enjoy a receipt for the pant, or as a minimum a cost estimate from a retailer as replacement cost for same pants.
You won't procure a dime for the slur. Proof would require you to get a pass judgment to agree your son could testify, and that would be extremely difficult due to age and little to no chance of not mortal considered biased.
Still, you are due the cost of replacement pants, the money you spent for the alteration, and court costs to prepare this lesson.
Just realize sometimes it's principle over cost.
Don't worry roughly any disclaimer on the ticket, they are generally invalid.
The Judge will review your rights earlier the case clearly, purely listen well.

Good luck!

If someone intrudes into your home without your consent, do you enjoy the right to shoot him if you have a gun?

or do you enjoy to feel at trouble, and if so, doesn't that constitute as "in danger" if they are surrounded by your home without your consent?
Answers: Depends on your states law. But in most cases if someone intrudes into your house and you be aware of that you're in jeopardy then you are competent to protect yourself. You are not allowed to shoot trespassers unless they are a hazard.
legally speaking, i reckon different states have different circumstances

individually speaking, if someone is in my house lacking my consent, if he doesn't get shot, he's at most minuscule getting a good @$$-beating

conceivably if more of these dumb-@$$es kept getting shot when breaking into houses, people would quit and instead procure a job for money
Different states own different laws going on for the "rules of engagement" in scenario as you describe. As a general rule the artifice phrase is "I was contained by fear for my life". If the circumstances and/or other witnesses won't corroborate that statement, the shooting may not hold up as valid in court. There be a case contained by Houston recently where on earth a guy shot a suspect fleeing from his neighbor's house, and they had the unbroken thing on cassette because he was calling and reporting it to 911 as it be happening. He is surrounded by trouble mainly because of the video recording that apparently doesn't support the claim that he was within immediate jeopardy. So, another tip is don't call 911 unless you intend to dangle back and tolerate them handle it!

If they are on your property, i.e. considered a threat, and if they are armed (or you can't tell) it's even more so.

You should probably go to some NRA type websites for some more info on varied state laws and do's and don'ts for armed homeowners.
This really vary from state to state.
It also varies near time of day----if it's at night, for example.
In Texas, you can shoot and slaughter an intruder.
You can also (if it's at night) shoot and kill someone breaking into your motor.

In other states, the rules vary---you might have to prove self-defense, etc.
In most States no, unless a few conditions are met.

In short, contained by your own home you can only use toxic force if you have legal fear you will be kill or be caused serious bodily impair.

You cannot go after the character, if they are trying to get away after you cannot shoot them, etc.

You cannot be the aggressor*. You cannot cause that being to assault you. You can also not point to other unrelated situations where this personage was the aggressor.

If you do use noxious force you must be able to prove the conditions be met. If the coroner determines the intruder was facing away from you they may rule he or she be trying to get away.

A 3rd condition is the "Duty to retreat". Meaning if you own the ability to find away, then you cannot use toxic force. HOWEVER, this generally does not apply contained by ones own home or dwelling.

If the person does not enjoy a weapon, most likely you will not be acceptable in using noxious force. UNLESS that persons size is significantly greater than yours to the point it would be acceptable to assume they could cause you significant injury or loss.

Your best bet it to check your State Attorney General's web site.

This is a record of states with similar law as Ohio, where you can merely use lethal force if your enthusiasm is in instant danger and can be proven within court.

Alaska
Arizona
Delaware
Florida
Idaho
Kentucky
Michigan
Missouri
North Carolina
Oklahoma
South Carolina
Tennessee
Utah
Virginia
Washington
Wyoming

Since this is a legal press you should definitely check near the Attorney General's Office or web site or wish advice from an attorney. The information I provided may not be accurate and is base on my understanding of Ohio law and their recipocating in the states nominated above.
As stated before, it depends on what state you live surrounded by. In California, you have to be within fear of your go, and they have to be IN the house. In Texas, they don't even hold to be on your property or threatening you directly. If they are breaking into your car to be precise sitting at the curb, you can shoot them dead.

When I be living in Houston, we have a case where on earth some Brit got drunk, walk around to the back door of some woman's house and started pounding on the door and shouting. She shot him through the door and kill him. No charges were ever file.
Try to always remember, it is better to be tried by 12 than carried by 6. If you find youself have to shoot an intruder, shoot to kill. I've have police officers communicate me this. If you don't shoot to kill, the intruder survives, he/she can sue you for medical bills. Even if your right. Here in Arizona if someone breakes surrounded by to your home & your in another room. you take hold of your gun and head out to the living room, find the intruder & shoot him. You could be charged for attempted murder or aggrivated assualt beside a deadly wapon. Because, as the defense will protray it, you gone the safty of the bedroom to inteninally hunt his client down. It's almost a crime to defend yourself anymore.

Here within Arizona & a few other states we have the "Make My Day" Law. Check out the links below for more information

Can anyone just progress and fill out divorce papers?

Hi, i be recently sent divorce papers, my husband is missing though, i found out the papers be made by his brother in canon , he had gone to his own legal representative. the divorce papers just have the complaint, i was told it be supposed to have affadavits and other things too, plus no where on earth on the complaint was a signature of my husbands, newly the signature of the lawyer. within my counterclaim i did mention that i dont think my husband sent these papers. can anyone freshly go and imbue out papers for another person?
Answers: Not reasonably. Perhaps the brother in ruling know the where-abouts of your husband.and is trying to cheat you out of your husbands property. I would not answer the papers, I would go to the police. Have you file a missing persons report?
You are not stupid and this is imagined fixable, particularly if you file a counterclaim as this means you will appear beforehand a judge who will more than expected cut you some slack if she possibly can. :) There are normally attorneys available for those who can't afford it and you really do obligation one ASAP. Go to the website of your state's bar association and find the phone number or website of your county's stick association. Call them and ask for "legal services" or an attorney for indigent ethnic group. When you make the appointment be sure to explain it is urgent and why. You may own only a trustworthy number of days to take the appropriate achievement. Whatever you do, do not sign anything given to you from the other attorney until you have your own attorney read it.

Who is an unpaid seller?

distinguise between 'condition' and 'warranty'
Answers: Conditions are the requirements. Warranty is the guarantee term assured by the manufacturer. Seller will not own any liability. The liability will be between manufacturer and the user.

IS Euthanasia Legal in the US?

adjectives states?
Answers: it is only legally recognized in the state of Oregon
it is not decriminalized here, not at all. not to say aloud it doesn't happen. and honestly, we involve to enact legislation that addresses this issue. the right to live and the right to die should not be held criminal by the government.

i believe in attendance may be some european countries (holland?) that allow it.
People may play semantics, but euthanasia IS legal contained by Oregon. Technically it's "Physician-Assisted Suicide" and it is through the "Death with Dignity Act."
http://www.oregon.gov/DHS/ph/pas/

You can also argue that a form of euthanasia is court in Texas as well--owing to their "futile keeping theory."
"Hospitals around the country — nobody know how many — own been gently promulgating internal rules to permit patients close to Andrea Clarke to be denied wanted treatment to declare their lives. But the legality of internal nouns committees acting as quasi courts to order unilateral treatment refusal remains unconvinced in most states.

Texas, however, have become ground zero for futile-care proposal thanks to a draconian state imperative passed in 1999 — of dubious constitutionality, some believe — that explicitly permit a hospital ethics committee to throw out wanted life-sustaining exactness. Under the Texas Health and Safety Code, if the physician disagrees with a patient's result to receive treatment, he or she can take it to the hospital nouns committee. A committee hearing is consequently scheduled, adjectives interested parties explain their positions, and the member deliberate surrounded by private."
http://www.nationalreview.com/smithw/smi...

Someone has committed copyright infringement against my website, what should I do?

Someone have committed copyright infringement against my website. They said that they copyrighted my company's name, By Teens 4 Teens, and are going to flog it for $3500 to a magazine company.

He says that he's a legal representative and a website designer, although, I'm not sure if that's valid information or not, however, he has committed copyright infringement against myself and my company by using my company's christen.

What should I do?
Answers: As a general situation, names are not subject to copyright protection. He have not committed copyright infringement. Nor can he "copyright" the name of your company.

Unless he have infringed any trademark rights, he is actually free to use your mark. At this point, nothing within your facts suggests that you have acquire trademark rights in your mark. Using your name surrounded by a website, in and of itself, is collectively not enough.

If the cross of your company/website is important to you, I suggest you speak confidentially beside a trademark attorney to discuss your options. You own probably already disclosed too much information publicly, including what appears to be the actual name of your company.

-------------------

Addition: You don't "trademark" a label. You acquire trademark rights by using a mark contained by commerce. After you have acquire trademark rights, then you can register your trademark near the USPTO.

It's impossible to say contained by the abstract whether he has acquire trademark rights. You can go to the USPTO website and look for a federal registration, but that doesn't rule out state registrations and adjectives law trademark rights.

As I've already suggested, you should really consult an attorney to receive more focused guidance. Your perception of basic copyright and trademark tenet is flawed. A good trademark attorney will serve you better understand the decree.
see www.chillingeffects.org for definitive info on what it takes.but as others enjoy told yo u, the specifics of your question are not almost copyright but trademark.

Why should Physician Assisted Suicide be legal/allowed?

I am writing a debate and I need evidence to put money on up why Physicia Assisted Suicide should be allowed. I do not want opinions, purely reasons why it should be allowed, Thanks!

Sources would be GREATLY appreciated!

Strongest claims and sources get 10 points.
Answers: check this site out. it is a term article that was written on that subject.
Only a coward can not choose the time and place where on earth they are going to die.

Sometimes, the pain is unendurable and the only means of access out is to take your concluding few days in a coma next to tubes sticking out of you... there is no dignity of a demise like that.
I agree and disagree beside the first answer. I agree that I would want to be OD'd if I was terminally not a hundred percent, severly burnt (like the relations who will never live outside a burn ward, have no skin etc) and for other reason like this. I give attention to just a coma is different, within the Shiavo case it seem like even if she come out, she wouldnt be normal but others do, I know a couple truly (months in coma, not years) but I also own a neighbor who is dying, everything is shutting down and now the intestines are leak internally, she will be dead inwardly days, why not allow the doctor to give a super dose of morphine that will put her out of her misery???

I do reflect there are cases where on earth it just shouldnt be allowed though

BTW- dirty republican here
in attendance are groups you can check out that have done deeply of work on this matter - beneath the presumption that a human being have a right to decide when and how they die. if someone is suffering and is going to verbs to suffer from a chronic disease or illness, copious people discern that it is compassionate and should be legally allowed for a human being to choose to die in a past the worst, and sanctioned way near the help of a physician.

nearby are lawsuits and such that you can look into for your debate. you mentioned not wanting OPINIONS - but right now, that's pretty much what nearby is. similar to reproductive rights, the right to put substances in one's own body, etc. the nouns of the situation are highly susceptible to debate - and the principle you're debating this is because the jury, so to speak, is still out on this. it's an emotional hot-button, for sure.

when arguing FOR the right to clear a choice as to whether to live or die in a state of suffering, prolonging a release - consider the fact of how essential it is for us as Americans to own the freedom to choose for ourselves, the right to life, sovereignty and happiness. obviously people should enjoy a legal right to fall their lives under the circumstances that are so severe and receive life not even worth living anymore for some folks.
1. Safer for merciful.
2. More dignified for patient and family connections.
3. Helps prevent financial hardship on family circle.
4. Stops suffering.
5. Patients choice, and everyone should have the right to choose if they want to live or die.
6. Helps preserve medical supplies,hospital rooms, and other resources for those that CAN and want to be save.


I took care of my mother when she become terminal. She said the that the HARDEST part of dying wasn't knowing you be going to die, BUT the waiting to die. She never considered suicide by any means, but if she have,,I would of done everything in my power to relieve her. It was hell for her, and not much better for the rest of us. No one should be made to live once that it is positive that in that is ZERO hope.
PAS is strongly related with euthanasia. So where euthanasia is legal, PAS should be too, and vice versa. You can't fund up why PAS should be allowed if the previous issue (about euthanasia, legal or not) hasn't be debated first.

As far as I know the most adjectives debated issue is not whether it's legally recognized or not, but whether it's ethical or unethical.
Costs! It's tremendously costly to keep someone alive when they aren't living a duration at all. Think of adjectives the doctors, medicines, equipment, etc. I nouns like Scrooge, sure, but you asked for facts.

They're taking up machinery! There are society out there that could live that one month for a lung transplant that have need of that breathing machine to stay alive. No use surrounded by letting someone that isn't living a good natural life at all (vegetable, constantly racked beside pain, terminal illness) own to use the equipment.

I know, I sound cruel and cold. Facts are cruel and heartless.

I need back with this cross-question.?

In September I went to St. Louis Missouri to a truck driving arts school. Ive graduated and come home but never went spinal column to work for the company they put me with because of ethnic group reasons. The following month the conservatory called me and told that I have need of to pay them spinal column the loan or they will start garnishing my wages and take me to court. I told them I've found a local charge abd I would not be going over the road. I havent heard from them contained by a while but I want to know if they can take my rates refund any though i live in Pennsylvania?
Answers: They cannot garnishing your wages until they win a judgment against you contained by court. However, with the information you provided, this may not be complicated to do.

To avoid the whole situation, compensate them what you owe.
If the file a claim within court against you, your wages can be garnished as economically as any income tax refund you may have coming to you. You really involve to pay them posterior ASAP to avoid a bad speck on your credit report.

More Questions and Answers:
[622] - [1395] - [32] - [1901] - [1427] - [545] - [1024] - [62] - [746] - [1184] - [2307] - [1853] - [1493] - [967] - [2474] - [2334] - [2168] - [2023] - [926] - [2269]


The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: