Law Questions and Answers

Are there protesters contained by front of EVERY abortion clinic?

Here we go beside the drama lol

no but seriously are they? I am just curious

Answers: No, not within front of every one. And even if there are, it is your right to enter those places. Yes, they own the right to free speech, but you have an equal right to not listen to them.

Not every clinic, no.

A few years ago, in that were protesters down the road from here so I'm guessing there's a clinic within that area that provides abortion services; however, I believe there's also a state imperative that establishes a certain distance the protesters own to allow. Which resulted in these protesters standing outside a dentist's department -- it was comparatively odd.

yes a few here within texas,

Getting attacked by a patron on the work. What is the employees official rights?

Can they sue the patron, or it is adjectives apart of the job? Grin and suffer it.

Answers: You can sue the patron for freestyle, thus recovering damages (medical bills, etc...unless covered by workman's comp), lost wages and maybe for distress and suffering.

Alternately, you could file for workman's comp as an on the errand injury and get much smaller number.

If the patron attacked you and you enjoy a witness(better for you to have a witness) ...heck yea you hold legal rights. No one is entitled to put in attendance hands on anyone. You necessitate to speak with an attorney and they will insist on you on what to do next. Don't allow anyone to attack you for any aim

Good Luck

physical assault is a criminal offense and a report with the police should be file. work should always be harrassment free environment.

Can I sue my school??

First, appreciation to all of those who responded to my sound out that posted initially about my stolen laptop from the institution library. However, I would like to clear somethings clear. First my laptop was not stolen by a student or a stuff or trainer. It was stolen by someone from the street who be not even suppose to be in the conservatory to begin beside. Second the emergency door was suppose to hold an alarm but this door doesn't have it and the camera subsequent the door doesn't work. yes I should have taken my laptop beside me but the school also should own made sure that the people who should not be surrounded by school stay out stale the school. what you guys deduce know???

Answers: Ummm, did ya get the laptop fund? Sounded like you did. Take responsibility for your travels. It is not the schools failing that you left your property sitting at hand unattended. I bet you would complain if tuition went up to repair the alarm and camera, right? What do you presume would happen to tuition if you sued. What are you trying to accomplish? You unmistakably felt safe and sound enough to move out your property attended, so that can't be it.

Its not worth it.

The cost of a lawyer and the intact trial process against a school district force is freshly time consuming and stressful.

Unless the laptop was over 3000 bucks or somehting,

naw.
Sh1t happen sadly.
And Schools can be dumb as apesh1t.

I'd say-so since you're in academy you're under 18, and no advocate will take you seriously. Further, to sue you must be an mature, since you're not, you'll need your parents. Good luck next to that. Learn your lesson and don't leave expensive electronics unsupervised.

Who is liable for my stolen jacket at work?

Today someone stole my jacket at work. My store won't allow us to put our jackets contained by the lockers, the coat check is insecure, it is all base on trust. Also, customers can just hike in and out of the room because nearby is no door or lock on it. Who is liable for my jacket? My store or me? I feel that they are responsible because here is no secure place to put your personal items. If I be responsible for my own things, where would they expect me to put something as crucial as a jacket if there is no where on earth to put it?

Answers: Unless you are a Union member and you are entitled to a locker or something approaching it as stipulated in your labor contract, you are pretty much responsible for the safekeeping of your own items.

My suggestion is that you converse to your supervisors about it and see if they will brand an exception for you and help you buy a current jacket..or ask them if they will provide you a locker to safekeep your personals while you are at work so that you don't have to verbs about your subsequent jacket getting stolen.

The person who stole it.

Richard

This in actual fact has be challenged surrounded by court, and unless you are required to bring it on the establishment, it's your responsibility to keep it undisruptive. I know, I know, it's freaking cold outside and that doesn't make sense, but there's a defence everyone I used to work with disappeared their purses in their cars and didn't bring contained by anything they ever wanted to see again.

I would suggest you ask running how you can file a claim near the insurance company who holds their policy, and see if you can get reimbursed for the attraction of the coat, or at least a portion of it. One entity is sure, you'll get nought if you don't' ask! Good luck!

Court orders 4 hours of daylight visitation to child abuser. Can this be challenged?

My neice's mother broke her leg when she be 2 months old. My brother within law (who be estranged from the mother at the time) got interim custody and has the child ever since. Child is very soon 2 years old. She lives next to her father and grandma ( bil's mother). The mom pleaded guilty to 2nd degree child assault. She got probation, took classes etc... she previously have SUPERVISED visitation for 2 hours twice a month. Recently they went pay for to court and new proclaim is the mother will get unsupervised custody for 4 days a month. Starting the first wednsday of the month to the following Sunday. This establish seems rather absurd and will be fundamentally traumatic for the child. She already screams for the entire supervised 2 hours she is near the mom. How can she be with mom for 4 days unsupervised. Child psycologist be in court and said that any extended visitation would be traumatic. Can this demand be challenged? What will begin if my BIL refuses to honor this custody visitation command

Answers: Yes, it can be challenged. Your BIL's attorney should record an appeal to the judge's visitation order. If your BIL violate the order the go-between who issued it can hold him in contempt of court and reformatory him.

Well, first if he refuses to comply he's contained by contempt of court, so don't go that route, he'll wind up up in sentence to prison.

You can always disobey every court order by going to a superior court, BUT... if the family court regard as being heard both sides and ruled, you better own something a lot stronger than what he hear to get the ruling changed. He plainly didn't put a lot of freight to what the psychologist said in audible range.

Your BIL's attorney can file a petition for a modern hearing if he think it will get re-addressed, but contained by the meantime he has to comply near the order as it stands unless the mediate puts a stay on the order.

Your BIL can be held surrounded by contempt of court if he does not comply with the decree and can be ordered arrested and jailed.

The court's job is to foster a relationship next to BOTH parents. The mother has complied beside the court's requirements by taking classes, participating in supervised visit, etc., and her efforts are mortal rewarded by allowing additional visitation.

It is not odd for 2-year-olds to scream when confronted next to new situations - especially if the custodial parent expresses anger more or less the situation. Your niece needs both of her parents. Please do your best to product this difficult situation easier for her by helping to prepare her for the time with her mother.

you should plainly get this challenge, although courts are always within favor of "reformed parents" who want to "receive things right and be a part of their child's natural life."

If your BIL does not honor the visitation orders, he can be charged next to kidnapping and later the child could be put in the custody of it's mother.

The best point you can do is try to be around or have anyone around to survey the mother with the child. The moment any mode of abuse shows up on the child is the moment you should phone the police and make a report so you can own a paper trail to transmute the visitation order. Even if she have a bruise when she comes back from her mother's home.anything explicitly out of the ordinary, product a police report.good luck and hopefully zilch bad happen to this child.

I have somewhat of one and the same situation and yes the courts gave him unsupervised visitation also which by the approach floored me. I have talk to lawyers and ppl contained by the courts and the response I get ably its the fater and he has right too. Well LOL why should a abused parent hold any rights. This was contained by the state of Maryland so you can check with your state law. Thankfully my sons father never has even so persued visitation but as the mother I will do what ever possible to protect my son if moving to another state with law that will protect him. Good Luck and Happy New Year:)

Would you risk losing your right hand for a million dollars?

In some countries they concord with thieve by amputation of their right hand.

Obviously it's a great deterrent but what would start if you were out within the desert or something and you came across this big sack of dosh containing $1,000,000 all within small denominations then would you alert the police or snatch the cash while nobody be looking?

There's a catch to adjectives this though. If they catch YOU after it's a fair bet that they will remove your mitt according to traditional religious custom. Would you take that occasion and pocket the cash or would you nickname the cops and if so then why would you name them?

Maybe you have another plan you would fairly implement. So come on, what would you really do under those circumstances?

Answers: Alright. I could name the cops and hopefully no one would collect the money (if that's how it works surrounded by said countries). I think the best plan would be to help yourself to the money and run with it, to the nearest U.S. Embassy. Hopefully, I will know how to get out of the country outstandingly fast, and the U.S. embassy would assist me plead my cause of finder-keepers-losers-weepers. If adjectives else fails and I lose my mitt. I would kindly ask could I keep hold of it as a reminder to me because I am really ready to transfer my ways. Upon reaching the United States, I would pay someone to reattach the severed feeler.

I would never do anything to endanger my right hand!
I'm a sculptor and if I lost that I would be out of work and VERY distraught!

People who ask hypothetical question should shampoo my crotch. I would definitely would miss the the use of my right mitt...if ya know what I mean.

We risk more than our right appendage every time we go outside or drive. The push button is to maximize gain at minimum risk.
As for the specifics of your question: If within is little chance of "they" catching me. finding a million dollars could be great. It's significant to avoid "they" as a general rule. If they arranged that I had done something wrong (whether I did or not), "they" would probably mutilate me. I avoid "they".

Maryland Law - Covering Vin number?

In the state of Maryland. Is it legal or unsanctioned to cover up the vin number located on the dashboard of a car or truck.

Please provide proof to your answer. Thanks

Answers: If one is trying to avoid repossession, the VIN number is stamped on parts adjectives over the car close to headlights (Mercedes), windows, inside fenders, underneath license plates (BMW), etc.

One can remove the VIN from every evident place and people can still find the VIN elsewhere; hence, covering the VIN is not a moving despoliation.

I doubt there is a specific provision that requires the morsel VIN to be visible. I found an annotated journal of the Maryland vehicle code online which I put in sources.

I read through a few section and found nothing. The likelihood of it being against a decree is slim, and the chance of this nature of law self enforced is also slim.

The risk is, as described by another answer, that if your vehicle is stolen it will be a little more difficult for you or the authorities to identify.

I also agree that the VIN is stamped adjectives over your car. The engine block, the nouns case, etc. There's also a public house code in your door jamb that can be read near a barcode reader to get the VIN.

Are cars elder than 1980 legal within Maryland? Those vehicles don't even own federally regulated VINs, so there would hold to be an exemption from any law just about VINs in the state. I doubt any exist.

What is definition of Prima facie case, res ipsa loquitur grip, in Civil Lawsuit contained by Federal or Circuit Court?

Best answer receives the points.

Answers: Prima Facie - respectively tort has a set of item that must be proven. If you can demonstrate each and every item, you have a prima facie overnight case. For example, the tort of battery: you must prove
1. volitional conduct yourself
2. intent to touch in a unwholesome or offensive carriage
3. actual touching of the body of the plaintiff (or something closely attached thereto)
4. causation

Res Ipsa Loquitur - latin for "the thing speaks for itself"
Res Ipsa Loquitur is a special munificent of circumstantial evidence that allows the jury to make an inference of negligence within the absence of any actual evidence. In direct to invoke R.I.L, there must be an stroke of luck of the kind that does not usually occur in need negligence, the negligence was probably that of the defendent (the instrumentality be exclusively in the control of the defendant), and the plaintiff did not contribute to the coincidence. R.I.L. is used as a last resort - and it is merely evidence of negligence, not proof.

Prima facie case is, such as will prevail contradicted and overcome by other evidence. a valise which has proceded upon sufficient proof to that stage where on earth it will support finding if evidence to contrary is disregarded. A prima facie case consists of sufficient evidence within the type of case to grasp plainiff past a motion for directed decree in a jury skin or motion to dismiss in nonjury grip; it is the evidence necessary to require defendent to proceed beside their case.

res ipsa loquitor: The entry speaks for itself. Rebuttable presumption or inference that defendant was forgetful, which arises upon proof that instrumentality causing injury be in defendent's exclusive contol, and that the misfortune was one which ordinarily does not transpire in skiving of negligence.

What are your opinions or view on the legal civilian handgun ownership within the U.S.?

Answers: It's not the law abiding citizens who own and relish firearms that commit crimes. It's criminals who do not obtain them rightfully that commit crimes. Crime does go down when relations are allowed to carry. Perhaps a better answer would be to in actuality punish criminals for their crimes.

In favor.
It has be shown to reduce ferocious crime everywhere
'right to carry` laws own been instituted.
Those who refute it really have no exact leg to stand
on, and depend on 'everybody knows they're dodgy ` type
emotional appeals that own been proven wrong.

I infer a lawful citizen should know how to carry a concealed handgun EVERYWHERE unless everyone entering an nouns is searched for ordnance and checks weapons at the door (such as a courtroom)

within is a reason adjectives of these mass killings develop in Schools, Churches, and Malls.

They are adjectives places where the State have disarmed the victims.

If you are trained and law abiding you should be allowed to transport everywhere.

well let put this into perspective, the United States is also the leading country, statistically speaking, contained by car wreck fatalities. so are we going to restriction the sale and ownership of vehicle? no we are not. it is too big of a business. so should we ban the Dutch auction and ownership of handguns? as far as the 2nd Amendment right to own and possess firearms, in good health that depends on your interpretation iof the amendment. when the framers of the Constitution wrote the Bill of Rights, it was during a time surrounded by which there wasnt a notably structured and organized military. the responsibility of protecting the states fell to every man in every community within every state to be ready at a minute's become aware of to bring thier guns to the area of attack and to protect their community, state, domain. as far as specific ownership of handguns to civilians, or citizens, that remains to be see by the decision of the United States Supreme Court surrounded by the case that they are audible range this next year.

i devise that anyone responsible should own a handgun as long as they possess the responsible nature and exibit the discipline i.e. inherent to own one. you should be knowlegeable in the use and sanctuary and teach those safekeeping procedures to any children that you might have that could possibly come contained by contact with the gun.

i do not take out hearing nearly any over-abundance of death by artillery in the hasty days unless it was during criminal commotion, and then i dont assume it was that great of a number. i know that i never hear of an accidental shooting during the days where on earth everyone had guns.

Why is Abortion a Crime?

Why is Abortion a Crime? (other than the fact that it kill life)

Answers: For some, it is the taking of a life, although surrounded by the US, Roe v Wade makes abortions legalized (although recent legislation makes it tough to get)

In the USA, it's endorsed. I don't know where you are from.

No, I'm not pro abortion, but I'm stating reality.

pick up a news treatise every once in a while mate it isnt unjust. so it is not a crime.

Wow find your teacher and slap them for me please they bungled at their job

If you are referring to the U.S..it isn't a crime.

Roe v Wade assured the authenticity of abortion.

It isn't a crime. Criminalizing it is immoral. It does not decline the abortion rate but drives it underground, making it less nontoxic for women.

So how does one reduce the abortion rate? Well, we can swot from western Europe, which has the lowest abortion rate (as a region) contained by the world (half that of the US). The countries with the out-and-out lowest abortion rates are Belgium and the Netherlands (about a third of the US rate), both countries that allow abortion on demand. But they own universal healthcare, support children and mothers and enjoy (almost) free education. In those countries, have a child is much, much easier than anywhere else. They even offer incentives (tax rebate, monthly stipends, etc.). And they have low poverty rates.

In summary: criminalising abortion is insanitary to women and does not reduce the number of abortions, so it is licentious. To reduce abortions, we want to reduce poverty, engender healthcare and education available to adjectives and support mothers (stipends, childcare, catching deadbeat dads,...). Western Europe leads the bearing.

More Questions and Answers:
[380] - [1909] - [599] - [400] - [1773] - [118] - [1829] - [1157] - [1092] - [1261] - [1384] - [1256] - [1620] - [1533] - [2523] - [1937] - [516] - [1382] - [1096] - [999]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: