Law Questions and Answers

Legally...Do you have to enjoy permission to post a person's picture on-line?

What if the soul is a minor? Do you have to hold parent's permission? I'm thinking this is not required at adjectives.look at all the stuff on-line ya know. Any anwers are appreciated...gratefulness!
Answers: The person who created the pic (the photographer) owns the copyright, NOT the party who is in the pic. It is without fault legal to post peoples pictures on-line minus their permission if you enjoy permission from the copyright holder.

EDIT: One exception to the above is if someone compensated you to take the pictures, resembling a portrait photographer. In that case the picture would be a "work for hire" and the party that paid you would own the copyright.

As someone mentioned within are some states where they hold drafted laws against posting strangers pictures for profit (girls within bikinis) without okay. It isn't clear whether these laws are constitutional, but.

The only other restriction is that you cannot post a picture of a VIP (or someone who makes money sour of their image) in an classified ad.
yes, you have to enjoy permission. for minors you must hold the parent's permission

simply because people do it on myspace doesn't connote it's ok. lots of people are doing lots of stuff that isn't court
The answer is NO!
You don't have to enjoy permission to do it.
It's simple and in attendance is a lot of software out at hand that makes it straightforward to do.
Now here is something you might want to consider.
You can be sued for doing it and you might end up any paying a huge fine, going to jail or both.

But you can do it short having okay.
YES for sure
right of picture,voice,handwriting and etc is from the rights which is related to perspnality which other people can not breach it beneath human law.and if it;s from a minro the say-so of parent is neccesory
i would think that for a minor--you would own to have sanction from the parents, but i'm not sure. i believe that as long as you aren't making $$ off of the photos--you can post anyones picture i.e. over the age of 18
Anyone depicted in the photographs can technically sue you for using an sign in their likeness.. Most won't want royalties and if it doesn't depict them as the main focus of the photograph, after they can't seek damages. Unless as you would expect you're a member of reporters and have a press card.

However it's other good to transport little "permission slips" if you will for someone to sign if they're surrounded by your photo and you're seeking monetary gain from it.

Here's a pretty generic form for you to use. Happy photographing!

http://www.vplc.org/photo-pdfs/model_rel...

Hero or vigilantly?

This guy I know got his truck stolen two night ago. Last night he be going home in a work truck and stopped at a red oil lamp. Next to him was his truck and the bump who stole his truck. He jumped out a wooped that guys a*s. The theive is immediately pressing charges against the guy. It all happend surrounded by Texas where you can protect your house and personal property. Is the martyr of theft going to bring back in trouble?
Answers: I commend the man for kicking some ****, however my experience near the law have been pretty unenthusiastic, I owned some rental property and one evening about dusk a man who lived within came to the organization and asked me to come out side I had no reproving nor idea he be angry so I went out side, and nearby wa another guy in the drive method with a shot gun, the first guy be calling me some bad name, and I knew I be in trouble, so as i walk along I pretended I had not see the guy with the gun, when I reach him , I grabbed the gun and kicked this guy, and jerk the gun from his hands, and proceeded to spank both of them,they had me arrested and I completed up having to rate their hospital bills plus their loss of wages, I really don't know what to expect from the law except B,S, a two bit prosecutor who requirements to get a spike in his headdress can make you look resembling you are a monster in any situation, I will be praying this guy get a fair accord, something seldom dealed out in our court system.
He should be punished for mobile.

It would have be very graceful for him to call the police and follow the personage somewhere.

That was not protection of human being or property, it was retaliation.
___
Edit: A open-minded deal would be him one prosecuted and punished for his crime, and the other person prosecuted and punished for theirs.
Had he stopped the man within the act it would enjoy been an conduct yourself of defense and thus protected in most states.
From a permissible standing, he lynched that person-punished him with no trial. That is against the directive for a reason and he wishes to be punished.
Theft is a crime and so is assault.

Cell phone and police vehicle radio transmissions travel must faster than vehicles. Assuming your friend have a cell phone, he could have phoned 411 and given pertinent information while he followed the stolen vehicle. It would hold probably been stopped and the driver arrested inwardly 10 minutes, if a metro area.

Otherwise, he should enjoy followed the stolen vehicle to its destination. Driven to the nearest phone and called 411 beside pertinent info then returned to a surveillance location and wait for the police to arrive and do their job.

Since he did not do this, he should hold said that when he confronted the driver, the guy assaulted him and he did what he could to defend himself from what he perceived to be a threat of serious bodily spoil. Then when he announced to the guy that he was performing a citizens arrest, the guy tried to run away. Not that this scenario would take any legal immensity, but it sounds better in court than,"My truck be stolen, When I saw this guy at a stop light driving my truck I drug him out of it and I assault the **** out of him." What he said he did was a textbook example of assault.

Question about what i thought might be a will?

ok, so im 13. and just now we had a house friend over that lost his wife a couple months ago. he dropped of an envelope addressed to my parents, stayed, ate dinner next to us, then departed. this morning my friend and i where limp out in the people room and i saw the envelope (it wasnt sealed or anything i figure it was another christmas card) so i open it, and saw some sort of legal document, it have the guys name that dropped it sour at the top, and under the words 'beneficiary' it have my name, i be really confused because i knew afterwards i wasnt supposed to read the paper so i shoved it final in the envelope. All i remeber seeing it the guys describe at the top, and his information, my name underneath 'primary beneficiary' (excuse me if i spelled it wrong) and i remeber a 100% after the words that where somthing close to 'percentage recieved' and my address and phone number. there where on earth no other names programmed under beneficiary, but in that was another blank spot close to there should/wouldve be one there.
Answers: It sounds approaching it was any a Will or a copy of an insurance policy. These are the primary documents I can think of that would use the word "beneficiary." I'm penchant towards an insurance policy because of the phrase "primary beneficiary." A Will that was written by an attorney would enjoy beneficiary and "alternative or contingent" beneficiary rather than "primary beneficiary." This is newly an educated guess, but it does nouns like a document that leaves assets to you.
It sounds approaching your mother doesn't want all of the money getting to your organizer. Be honest and tell her you looked already and enjoy a discussion about it. Be sure to store most of it for college.

Can't anyone in Texas notify the truth about this period of war?

I mean immediately with that little 6 year ripened girl lying about her father self killed contained by Iraq to win a couple of consert tickets; demeaning our brave men/.women who have given the perfect sacrifice. And of course Bushy's lies. What is it, something contained by the water or is it their civilizing system, morals (or lack thereof?)
Answers: Last time I checked ALL populace CAN lie! Do adjectives choose to lie NO, they don't. So I don't see any rationale to blame all of Texas for one 6yr olds fib. (Honestly she must of have some help beside that I would think!) Also, Texas for what I've see has alot more morals, and values than alot of this country so I really don't see how you can blame that on Texans any just because our president is from Texas dosen't show all of the texans down here are approaching him! Oh and just because we are contained by the south we aren't all hicks and hillbillys any!
I seriously doubt that a six year old could possibly fabricate something approaching that. Obviously she had fully fledged supervision. But what possible difference does her location have to do beside it? It could have be California, Pennsylvania or even Alaska.

Bush was from Texas but that doesn't penny-pinching that everyone in our state agrees near him because plenty are against him. I have never voted for him and enjoy a deep loathing for him since I grain that he is indirectly responsible for the lives of 4,000 of our GI's in the Iraq quagmire, which he started.
Because merely people surrounded by Texas lie?
Do you really ruminate that people here are not really looking down on that little girls mother for have her daughter tell such a flop?
No there is nil in our hose down... and we have some of the best colleges surrounded by the US here!
People do f***ed up things all over this country, parents involve to look at the morals they teach their children, not freshly in the US but adjectives over.
It's not Texas with that morality problems... it's inhabitants all over this world (and yes some live surrounded by Texas).
Also remember that no ones vote counts in Texas... thankfulness to our governments wonderful system my vote did not be set to anything! In fact within was no point surrounded by me voting at all!
The State of Texas is not accurately represented by the Bush Family.
REAL Texans are feeling shame by the GWB claim of being a bona fide associate of our state. There is a villiage in Texas that is to say missing its idiot. Except "missing" simply means they observe he's gone - they aren't clamoring for his return.
Maybe you should ask the more relevant question: Why isn't anyone surrounded by Maine standing up proudly for their carpetbaggers who went to Texas and successfully convinced the rest of America that they be TEXAN?

What is the percentage of innocent people on loss row?

Better yet, what are the probability of a person on loss row being put to demise in America? Best on the other hand, how many population on death row are not guily?
Answers: Man, everybody surrounded by the joint claims to innocent. Go digit.
Your question cannot logically be asked.
Because it depends on who you ask!
According to the actual inmates on annihilation row it's around 98%.
Without an actual guilty plea, there is some grill of innocense.
But everyone on death row have been found guilty.
i resembling the way you devise you should ask george bush you
wont get more accurate answer than this
0%
They own all be found guilty in a court of decree

A better question would be how mant empire should be put to death that are not? Or How nany guilty population are free because of the court system?
If we knew the percentage wouldn't they own been consent to out?

And yes, there are populace who deserve to die. If someone rapes and kills my child, they deserve to die and by my hand if the police don't put a rush on getting to the scene.
This feeling sorry for the criminals bit is what is tear us apart and adding strange cities to the "most dangerous place to live" enumerate. When a criminal can shoot a cop right outside of an awards ceremony for police because he knows zilch is going to happen to him consequently we have done something wrong.

Also. A entity who attempts genocide on an entire race and make a pretty good dent also deserves to die (preferrably surrounded by one of his own gas chambers).
Percentage of innocent people: Impossible to figure.
Percentage of guilty people: 100%
Percentage of not guilty ancestors: 0%

Guilty or not is determined by the jury based on the best evidence. It is individual indirectly related to actual innocence of the crime.
OJ showed us that being "not guilty" and one innocent are not the same article.
__
The death cost is not murder if used properly. It is a last resort for relatives who have shown that enjoy no ability to or desire to live properly surrounded by society. It is no different than putting down an aggressive dog--it is done for the safety of the community, not within retaliation.
likely nope since the system of check is near
but a person which influence he did it when he know he did not do it then the check will not work on his casing
Close to none. Once in a while someone is found innocent and next it is played out like that one party is a majority. (Actually, that's all the medium does. reports on the exceptions in society approaching they are the rule).

As for the attorneys who 'represent' people contained by court, ALL are guilty of lying, fraud, greed and abuse. They write the imperative in a approach that exempts them from all punishment.

I am competent to put up with it because I know they will take theirs in the End.
NONE!!!! They adjectives did something to get in attendance!

If i accidently gave away something that have $4000 in it and a diamond necklace, do i enjoy any legal right very soon

ok, so on freecycle, i give away stuff i dont necessitate. so my mother in directive gave me 75 brand trial purses from her collection she acquired over lots years. i picked out what i liked and the rest i give away.

2 months later, she realize she hid $4000 contained by cash and a diamond necklace contained by one of the purses i gave away.

do we hold any legal right presently? to get it backbone? it was a complete catastrophe and i know the person have it, and now is avoiding me because they dont wanna make available it back.

the necklace be of much sentimental value and my mother surrounded by law is distraught out of her mind very soon,as am i.

i know the person have it, and since ive called her and emailed her in the region of it, she is suddenly MIA and avoiding me. heck i even went to her livelihood and she wasnt there, when she owns the place!!!

what can i do?? anything?? (i hope)
Answers: Do you own proof that the jewelry and the cash be in the purse? I doubt you do, so near is nothing you can do. Consider this a totally expensive lesson.
I think you are out of luck for several reason. One is that it is your word against the buyer. They buyer can proclaim there wasn't any money or diamond necklace surrounded by the purse and how could you prove there be?

Sorry...
Tragic.
I doubt you have any endorsed rights at all, and I sympathise next to your predicament.
All you can do is persevere (no pun intended).
You hold no rights. Neither does your mother-in-law. Once you gave the stuff away, you didn't own it anymore. I find it thoroughly hard to believe it took your MIL two adjectives months to "remember" she hid $4000 and a diamond necklace contained by one of 75 purses. sorry, but you're SOL.

Edit: One more thing...the diamond necklace. If it be of such sentimental value, why did she cram it into a purse, instead of a past the worst deposit box, jewelry box, or some other place.
My answer is this:

1) do you have evidence of the items man placed there by your grandmother, as within witnesses?

2) if the situation was reversed, what proof would you emergency to verify that they were self honest?

3) there are finders keeper laws surrounded by the country, I am not sure but they may apply here.

4) Be careful, the personage you are contacting may press harassment charges against you, if you touch you have a crust you will need to work through an attorney. You are bordering on discrimination or may have crossed that boundary. Going to her work place and cause any turmoil will result only surrounded by legal problems for you.
Your mother owned it when she give it to you. However, she did not mean to present the valuables away, and if she had requested them subsidise from you, then you should enjoy returned them since she didn't mean to furnish them away, and still owned them.

However, your conduct broke the ownership chain. You give away the purses (and their contents since you didn't check). The new owner is the owner of the purse and any contents.

You can sue, but doubt that you would win.

** Note: This is a broad discussion of the subject matter of your quiz and not legal proposal. Local laws or your one situation may change the broad rules. For a specific answer to your question you should consult officially recognized counsel with whom you can discuss adjectives the facts of your case. Answering this interrogate does not indicate an attorney-client relationship. **
If she is so forgetful, how can she now remember the precise purse she put it contained by?

I think you are SOL
I must disagree next to the other posters. There are 3 classes of property that has be lost...

Lost - the true owner has no impression where the property be lost, like a see dropped on a street. The true owner still has the best title, and the right to claim it. The finder have best title over all BUT the true owner.

Abandoned - the true owner have NO INTENTION of ever returning for the property to exert his property rights. This item belongs to the first person to claim it.

Mislaid - the true owner put something somewhere designation to return for the item. The owner of the locus (the place where it be put), has the best title over anyone EXCEPT the true owner. The change and the necklace were MISLAID. Your MIL's perform of giving you the purse didn't mean that she intended to give you the dosh & jewelry. Likewise, you gave away a purse, and not the currency & jewelry. You can sue this woman in civil court for return or for the true attraction of the contents of the purse.

It costs $250 MILLION to execute someone?

http://www.deathpenalty.org/index.php?pi...

Did you know this? And, is it just me or are lawyer crazily overpaid?
Answers: That is a VERY misleading figure. Typical of a site trying to verbs facts to fit there agenda hoping individuals, like yourself, will turn "oh my God" without really looking into it. See, they donate up the entire cost of the ENTIRE criminal justice system after divide it by the number of inmates on death row. Not exactly irrefutable. Its like adage we spend billions to catch a shoplifter, simply because the combined cost of adjectives US police depts is billions of dollars.
It is also like truism your hangnail cost 600,000 dollars to fix because a doctor paid 600,000 dollars to walk to medical school. No, he see a lot of patients and his costs are borne by the total system, not one single person. Get it?
The site is twisting facts to cause its case. It points out that it costs, for example, 90,000 to house a single inmate on loss row, then add that figure to the total. That is incorrect and misleading.
If they said HAVING the death cost costs X amount, thats OK, but to add up adjectives the costs and allege that that is the price to execute a single character is false. It costs a lot, but far smaller quantity than 250 million to execute a inmate.
Even at 100,000 a year, a person on departure row for 20 years would only cost 2 million. The execution itself is cheap. Trials do not cost 248 million. Sorry.

Don't cart everything you read as gospel. look into it and see what their agenda is. That is what educated, intelligent associates do.
That definitely seem higher than is passable! I'm not sure that is a correct #.

BTW - ziggurat4u is right! Another HUGE burden from our friends at the ACLU!
Yes, lawyer are well rewarded. Do you have any view how much it costs to get thru tenet school?

And no, I don't construe it costs $250 million to execute someone. I know drugs are expensive, but I don't think that fatal injection stuff costs quite that much.
That's rule style accounting. They're taking the entire costs to maintain loss row for ALL who have received a passing sentence, and are applying those costs only to the few who are no longer in that, and aren't incurring costs any more.

The problem is, it's the ones who aren't dead but who continue to wrack up the expenses.

By their accounting method, you could bring those per party costs down drastically by executing inmates at a greatly accelerated stride.

This is what happens when you own journalists trying to do math. It's complete trivia.

I'm completely anti-death penalty, by the approach. This kind of idiocy doesn't assist the "cause," at adjectives.
Technically, it doesn't cost much to execute a person. It's adjectives the incurred expenses from arrest to time of execution that cost the tax payers. I do not know the average cost per execution, but $250 million sounds outrageous. I hold read that it cost more to keep a character in prison per year than the annual individual income of the majority of Americans, and this also is outrageous.

Many lawyer are overpaid because they over-bill! Watch out for this, especially, at the larger law firms.
Not individual that, but the millions in reparations to the family's of those that are wrongfully executed.I don't devise it is quite that much, but the closing I heard on MNSBC is that it costs 10 times more to execute someone that to keep hold of them in prison for vivacity (without the possibility of parole). That along with the cost of reparations to their family for wrongful executions...that is why they are never talk about. It is especially uneconomical to the taxpayers to say the tiniest. And IF they are guilty, I would much rather own them sit in prison and live to be a hundred to meditate about their crime, than to be put out of their misery close to a dog that I love.

Have you encountered an ethical problem on the undertaking? How did it resolve? Will you resolve for 2008 to face it?

Did you resolve the ethical issue at work, or will you resolve to solve the problem head-on surrounded by 2008?

Is there a price to compensate for ethics on the employment?

Is there a logical solution to resolving issues of conscience at work?
Answers: Yes I enjoy.

I was a driver for a distribution company. I be given an "assistant" to help me beside the route.

I am White, the assistant was black. All the other drivers (you obligation a commercial drivers license to drive these trucks) were black. If it's not clear, I be the only white driver.

Each driver have a route, and the driver gets hourly discharge AS WELL as a commission from the route. The assistant only get hourly wage. This is because the driving position requires a skilled and licensed person.

My route be the exception. My "assistant" got the commission, not me. This be the only exception to the commission going to the driver.

I be told that when the next "Route" open up I'd get it and the commission. Several routes open up.. and they simply hired new black drivers...

I have more experience than any of the other drivers... I hung around for a while to see how far it would go...

Oh yeah... adjectives my supervisors were black. Hmmmm..
Don't ask, don't put in the picture: the motto of the military and law firms, and I'm not referring to gays or lesbians.

In the military you keep hold of you mouth shut. The price for complaining about billing nouns, at law firms, is shunning from partner and timely termination, due of course, to down-sizing: one smaller number attorney, but only until your replacement is hired. Most attorneys are not stupid: they hold their mouths shut and follow the "Vegas Policy" of what goes on at the organization stays at the office. Lawyers practice tenet, not ethics.
Yeah...an unethically drunk individual in a critical nouns job.kicked him adjectives the way to the supervisor.

Happy!!!

Elysabeth
My husband and I work together. He's the simply ethical problem I have and the with the sole purpose way to work it out is divorce. I don't resembling being yell at, cussed out, degraded and blamed for everything that goes wrong, even when he cause the problem.

I have a spy period of 30 days pls draft me a resignation notification?

how should i start
Answers: Dear Supervisor:

Please consider this document as written notice of my resignation, next to January 31, 2008 to be my last year of employment with your company.

You may need to add phrases to the establishment sentence such as, "It is with regret that I must tender my resignation", or "Another opportunity have presented itself". You really need a moment ago the basic wording to receive the message across and down in writing. Good luck.
Dear Sir or Ma'am,
Please adopt this as written notice that I will be departing the company of (date).
Sincerely.XXX

You do not need to relay them you have another position. You can thank them if you resembling for supporting you in your job to date..but that's not necessary any.
Back in 1965, this is what my cousin communicated to my uncle: I hereby tender my resignation at the domestic business. I'm tired of taking orders and hold joined the United States Navy.

That memo was framed and is still sagging on the wall at the family business, subsequent to the citation for my cousin's Navy Cross.

How funny crazy is this?

how crazy is it that YAHOO gets to dictate what is appropriate answers and question...almost like elimination our freedom of speech...probably a law suit if anyone wishes to push the issue?
Answers: Well, I sort of agree about the freedom of speech point, but in Canada and other countries alike USA proviso about free speech doesn't exist. And, since Yahoo have its head bureau in Canada, that country's law apply to this service.

The internet is causing havoc amongst the world's imperative makers, and I find it awfully amusing that the old guard, who once controlled information to their profit, is having a enormously hard time containing it in a minute.

But, still those who will be the lawmakers within the not too distant future stipulation to act according to what is best for adjectives, and not take on impossible to tell apart manipulating the previous generation have done.
The user agreement say that by creating your account, you agree to abide by their decision on what and what isn't allowed.

So by signing up, you agreed to give up your freedom of speech on answers.
It's their sandbox and they put together the rules. It would be a failed lawsuit.

You enjoy the right to freedom of expression, but you don't have the right to free-express adjectives over someone else's server.
Nope. If you don't like it you are free to unseal your own site and run it the way you see fit.

The free speech protections are in that to keep rule from suppressing your voice not private enterprise.

Mando provides a perfect example of why you involve monitoring. If you allow his kind of bile to florish afterwards it multiplies.

Thanks for the perfect denial example.
If I put up a billboard & ask people to post stuff, I hold a right to decide what get taken down from the billboard without man guilty of violating free speech.

If YOU put up a bill board & I dance teardown stuff from YOUR billboards, THEN I would be violating your free speech.
> And, since Yahoo have its head bureau in Canada, that country's law apply to this service.


Yahoo's head department is in Sunnyvale, California. Pretty far from Canada :)

More Questions and Answers:
[305] - [240] - [935] - [1459] - [1234] - [1495] - [591] - [1172] - [1439] - [2109] - [1886] - [631] - [2403] - [2040] - [1904] - [637] - [771] - [221] - [2069] - [262]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: