Law Questions and Answers

Is the legal drinking age contained by Mexico 14?!?

I'm 16 and I'm going to Mexico soon and I wanted to know if it's true that the permissible drinking age there is 14.
Answers: 18 is the court age to drink and the resort areas do card you...
18 is the age.
but you shouldnt be drinking anyway
No why the hell would you think is 14???

Do I have to Pay Child Support?

A woman I use to date when I be 20( I am now 34), have a child, she told me she cheated on me, and told me it wasnt mines(the other guy signed the birth certif., and married her), 14 yrs later she, still married btw, is trying to embezzle me to court to prove paternity, and maybe child support. The summons claims the grandmother who is taking me to court, haves custody, but the child STILL lives next to the mother which I know for a fact. Can she, certainly the grandmother do this?
Answers: In Oklahoma you would not be liable because the other man signed the birt certificate. After 1 yr. even if DNA theory test proved he was not the father he would be responsible.
Friend of mine be told by his ex wife that his youngest daughter is not his but he still pays child support because he did not find out untill the girl was 5. The ex is in a minute married to the man they say is the father. You call for a lawyer.
No, the child isn't yours as it be claimed to be another man's. They can't force a paternity test on you, any.

If a paternity test did show you as the biological father it wouldn't event as all rights as its father be removed from you at its birth (but you shouldn't willingly agree to give somebody a lift one anyway). If, however, you wished to claim the child after you could take bustle to do so, but since the child was legitimately claimed by another then that can't be forced on you.
If your ex is married to this other guy and his autograph is on the birth certificate you should be free and clear; especially if the paternity experiment proves it's not yours.

However, if the paternity test reveals you are the father, you may enjoy a problem, in that satchel I would find an attorney. Again the time limits involved may work for you though.

I know I will grasp many thumbs down for this, but if it's not yours you could other sign your rights away if your ex agrees. I really don't see how her grandmother has any decriminalized ground to pursue action against you. Best of luck.
She indeed can , but it won't stand up contained by court ,there would enjoy to be a DNA tests run to prove that is to say indeed yours. If you can prove that the child still lives with its mother , next she has to hold you summons to court, and sill have the test.

What's a better way to ask more or less someone's negative member of staff record?

I'm writing an interrogatory (bunch of questions) for a class, and inevitability to ask a company to produce all the distrustful parts of an employee's records.
I hold brain freeze, and can't fathom how I should word it! Any help?
Answers: Ask for the employee's prior activities reviews. Or, ask if any disciplinary actions be recorded surrounded by the employees record.
I would phrase it thusly:
Is there anything within this employees long-gone or records I should know roughly before I hire them
Could you please attach or submit any information that would assist me in my evaluation of said hand
If for some reason you be aware of this employee wouldnt benefit my company please submit.. Thankyou Jane Doe Co, Inc.
I'm not sure but I would reckon that if a company put something like that down in print then they could be sued for deformation of traits, in duplicate way that a company can't furnish someone a bad suggestion.
You could try wording it like "If you could coppers one thing nearly employee X what would it be?
Is this character eligible for rehire? Why or why not? to which they all will decline to answer.
How abundant times did the employee receive a limitation.
How many times did the hand receive a reprimand.
How many times did the hand receive a suspension.
How many days be the employee suspended.
How tons times in the ultimate year was the hand late for work.
--- didn't request take off in finance
had remuneration garnished
When be the employee disruptive to the work place.

Interrogatories, okay. I don't know how plentiful of these questions are official to ask.
normally ethnic group won't answer this type of questions honestly.
eg. i ever hear my superior taking enquiry call from a co that my ex-colleague just amalgamated asking his performance and working attitude. My boss didn't let somebody know the truth that he actually enjoy quite impossible attitude (laziness) on working.

And one of my relative also ever received similar calls (from a famed co) checking on her ex-colleague. She also didn't tell the truth (actually her ex-colleague be asked to leave the co due to desperate attitude-always late to work, other call to bureau to take emergency confer on without valid reason, always on sick leaves, push works to others, did not own responsiblity sense, taking chit chatting over phone.).

i believe most of the time people would not speak bad of others if it relate to someone jobs. but i believe some will describe lies if he/she have a prejudice against the somebody, so it depends on the personage who make the question to wisely determine what is true and what is lies.
Provide copies of adjectives documentation in X employee's company personnel profile which would denote any negative production issues, including, but not limited to, write ups, actions reviews, attendance records, vocal counselings which have be noted in writing to hold occured.

Interrogatories don't need to be strictly question, most are, but they can also demand documents. The above should procure everything you need.

BTW, at hand is nothing dishonest about a prospective employer asking a previous employer about details of the employee's employment at hand. AND, there is zilch illegal roughly a former employer telling adjectives, as long as its true. First of all, even lying going on for it would not be a crime, therefore anything I read aloud is legal, but could find me sued civilly for slander or tortious interference with contractual relations. HOWEVER, if what I articulate is TRUE, the former employee would enjoy no lawsuit period. If I fired someone for burglary, and that was exactly why I fired him, later there's no slander because its TRUE. In order to be slanderous, it would own to be, by definition, false. That's a pretty common misconception, especially on Y!A, that previous employer can't say anything discouraging about you. They can, if its true and there's no lawsuit to be have.
1. Identify each and every transcription whether privileged or not as defined by the evidence code showing disciplinary reports, negative hand reviews, write-ups, negative reports, memoranda, studies both internal and external, suggestions, complaints, or any other documentation whether explicitly mentioned contained by this interrogatory or not relating to less than conventional employee presentation.

Follow up with a document request for adjectives of the stuff identified in the Rogg.
you can ask anything questions you want.
most companies will goal what information they give you for mistrust of litigation.
there is no tenet preventing a company from releasing work related information if they choose to. there is without doubt no law preventing anyone from asking for information.
you can ask for hire date, starting rate of discharge, last rate of repay, job duties, termination date, explanation for separation, you can ask if there be any disciplinary issues that related to policy violations, you can ask for narration evaluations, you can ask about promotions received and those promotions that be not.
many companies will not confer information because they do not have proper documentation to up hold their decision concerning the employees available job performance. therefor they will not risk giving you information that may return with back to the member of staff and then raison d`¨ētre a conflict or a lawsuit. when you request this information do not request it from HR send your request to a junior beneficiary of management who may not know what to detail you and will give you more information afterwards upper management or human resources will. if you don't receive a response then carbon copy to HR and see what they will furnish you.

do not ask for negative information ask for adjectives information and then you wish what is relevant. also asking for all information you put the request contained by a good street lamp (a job reference) a bit then it looking approaching you are digging up dirt.
Well, basically you can't.

When I did hint checks, I would ask if the person would rehire the former hand. If I got a "Yes", fine - I be happy. If I get a "No", I would try and slip in some "leading" question. "Was it due to their timeliness?" "What, was he/she a handful?". . . You know, try to form it casual, and a bit light as if humour. You would be surprised how much you can find out by being a bit dispassionate with another entity.

Actually, companies now days are greatly against giving ANY reference - they will verify date of employ, rate of settle up, and final position. Other than that, you are lucky to get a point. It is due to employees finding out roughly speaking conversations. If a former employer gave a insinuation the employee didn't agree beside, they basically get a slander suit handed to them on a silver platter. References directly effect a person's skill to make a living. If someone said something and an hand disagreed with it, the company took the hit. So they in a minute give nought. I am the very same course.

I have an Interview near Ralphs (supermarket)...?

..Im 36 weeks pregnant and 18 years old!! i stopped working at my previous opportunity during my 5th month to take it unproblematic with my pregnancy however im awareness able to work again and i really would resembling a job i can come posterior to after the baby is born.. and working for this company would be a flawless oportunity for that.

My question is during my interview should i let somebody know them im pregnant or not?


I've been contained by this situation before and i be discriminated agaisnt and the employer took back their charge offer when i showed up to work my vastly first day they asked if i be pregant i said yes, and they said i shouldve told
Answers: your medical situationis none of their business until you take parenthood leave.
Are you showing? If so, I don't reckon it will be an issue. They'll know.

Anything you want to get stale your back up to that time 2008???

if it isn't yet
Answers: The unconstitutional programs run by the federal rule and the IRS.
All the welfare leeches I'm carrying.

Richard
Grouchy old men who want to legislate healthcare for women!

Welfare to corporations approaching the mortgage companies who made bad investments and immediately claim they are ruined because of mortgages they wrote.

The weight is too chunky for me to bear! Especially, these biddable for nothing sods who hold been contained by public office adjectives of their lives slurping at the never-ending trough salaried for by hardworking citizens. Enough of these morons who have have healthcare paid by the governing body for generations but would deny medical strictness for kids. The weight of a short time ago one of these greedy hogs is breaking my back! Pay for your own healthcare, lunch, housing and transportation similar to the rest of us have to! No more welfare for craft politicians!
Republicans!!!

How come Sara Jane Moore was released, but not Squeaky Fromme?

those events (presidential assination attempt against Gerald Ford) happen nearly 30 years ago, and Lynette Fromme's gun was uniform. I'm not saying she's not a nutcase, but has'nt she served her time
Answers: Because the manson murders SUCCEEDED!!! HELLO!!! Plus, it be planned out meticulously by a possessed person. Charles Fking Manson!
Sara Jane Moore have expressed regret. She passed the parole board, and was released.

Squeaky Fromme have not expressed regret. She has be deemed a vulnerability to herself or others. She obviously have not been passed through a parole board. And, she probably is a nutcase. Do you really want to see her free?
Sarah Jane Moore is not a peril to society (So I've heard.)

Watch the documentary "Manson" where on earth Squeaky talks at length nearly he deep devotion to Charles Manson and Helter Skelter and I have a sneaking suspicion that you will understand why Squeaky's not relatively ready for release. Squeaky's gun be not empty; she only just didn't realize you have to chamber a round. But don't explain to her!

How do I report a potential scam or attempt to fraud in America?

I received one of those online parcels stating that I could have access to a massive wall account overseas. I know the notification is a scam, but need to know who to report it to. I don't want to hit the "spam" button, because I want to at smallest try to catch these crooks, not block them. Can anyone help out?
Answers: At first I sent them Pee Wee Herman Dance Card
http://www.tvdance.com/peewee/
but that got prehistoric.
now I simply delete.
forget roughly tracking down etc...
they somewhere in Africa
Tell your State Police. If they are not the
authority that deal with the situation, they
will direct you to the right parliament unit.
Report it beside printed copy of email to the Attorney Gerneral's Office for the state that you live in.

Also report it to the email owner you have for fraud and name-calling.
I used to recieve tons of these letters.
I merely delete them.
You can report them to whichever internet service was used e.g.Yahoo.A.O.L. etc,
Just update others about it so you can prevent someone from person scammed.
The proper agency to report these scam letters to is the US Federal Trade Commission. They enjoy an online website for you to fill out a form reporting the fraudulent email at: http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/edcams/sp...

Good luck.
There is no agency for the exception of the FBI's Cybor
division that could remotely concordat with this,

Good luck and please dont leak prey to this crap,
I believe you can report Internet scams to the FBI at www.fbi.gov.

Are you sure it's a scam? I get a letter from a Nigerian guy whose father was the Minister of mining and he a short time ago needs my checking commentary number and PIN so he can give me 10% of adjectives of the diamonds in King Solomon's mines. But i hit the delete button and presently I'll be stuck answering Yahoo questions until I die.

Internet scam are the great Nigerian pastime and, at lowest possible, they send you a story to read.

Problem with my sister's work (she's pregnant)?

My sister works a Scetcher's in NC and lately her advocate has seriously be mistreating her (verbally). She doesn't want to quit b/c that's her only source of income until the toddler is born in Feb. or Jan. and her boss refuse to fire her just so she doesn't grasp unemployment.

This individual is irrational I've begun to interrogate her sanity. It's resembling she's intentionally doing this to my sister. She's spoken to the DM, but he seem similar to he doesn't care.

My quiz is: What are her rights in the work place? Keep surrounded by mind that she's pregnant and the DM seem tired of something in issues occurring within the store.

Thank you.
Answers: I think she should newly relax and try not to worry...I tight-fisted she's almost outta there...or she could try to find an attorney. I have something similar happen to me and I found a massively nice sexual harassment (that is what this would drop under believe it or not) attorney to write a note to her boss to let them know she is considering allowed action against her employer. An attorney will usually do this for free contained by anticipation of filing a lawsuit. I surmise if her employer is warned they will play nice. Good luck!
at hand is no law preventing a boss from mortal bitchy to an employee - more than probable she is frustrated with your sister because man pregnant she can't perform her position duties like she should be.

It's retail - kindof a bottom of the firkin job to some ancestors - personal conflicts happen.

I posed a question on impulsive alcohol checks for car drivers and a?

lot of individuals said you can refuse the check.if you fefuse here you are immediately arrested.i must be living surrounded by a police state.may i add the law for drink driver testing be to decrease our road toll.this year we are 20 death up on last year,so it is broken
Answers: You can always shun the test, and you will probably be arrested. But that doesn't aim you'll be CONVICTED.

Were you up 20 deaths from DUI's? Or be the DUI's more widely reported now at hand was trialling?

I think volatile alcohol checks are not so bad. If you're not doing anything wrong, what's the big accord? If it saves a loved one from person killed by a drunk driver, I have a sneaking suspicion that its a GREAT idea.
I believe that here it's criminal to do "random" tests.. I focus they have to enjoy a legitimate sense to ask you to take one.. Speeding, swerving, smell of alcohol, lying to the officer, etc.. If they enjoy nothing, lawfully they shouldn't have you steal it.. Though, they are the police and many are going to do it regardless.. I'd ruminate..

If you refuse and they hold a reason.. You will acquire cuffed and taken in.. If they do not hold a reason... Supposedly, they hold no power and they have to permit you go.. I doubt that happen often.
You can discard the test contained by the US but if you do, the result is that your license is suspended. BUT. you don't get a DUI on your journal.

However, the police have to hold probable cause to ask you to run the test - within are no random search allowed in the US, and a breath theory test is considered a search.

Richard
ummmm
who know?
They were a downfall from the beginning. The intent & purpose be to apply fines to increase revenue. They can be called fickle checks at random checkpoints or any designation a politician wishes to call it - it is still not permitted search n spasm.
The 'Probable' comes from you refusing length, at wich point you can be detained up to 72 hrs. Either case, you loose time & money, even so keep a charge of your copy, no matter how dishonest (oops - honest) that charge is.

What is the LEGAL age for minors to stay home-alone in SD, CA?

Answers: In California it is 13.
There isn't one, contained by either State.

In both States it's up to the parent - but if they bestow a young child alone inappropriately they can be charged beside child endangerment.

Richard
This is not determined by age, it is determined by maturity.

We determine this by asking a series of question about what you would do surrounded by case of an emergency. The answers the creature gives determines if they are experienced of being departed alone.

There are other factors too... how long they are moved out alone, whether it is day or darkness, how far away the nearest help is, etc.

More Questions and Answers:
[722] - [461] - [603] - [1276] - [2260] - [1414] - [805] - [2115] - [399] - [2359] - [2248] - [1133] - [1522] - [617] - [463] - [1957] - [626] - [912] - [1590] - [1272]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: