Law Questions and Answers

Ex-Fiance charged with Cruelty to children and Simple Battery Last Night?

Last darkness I called the cops because he be physically hurting me in front of my three year antiquated daughter.
He was charged next to Simple Battery, Cruelty to Children in the 3rd deg, and something else, not sure what it be.
What kind of punishment is he looking at and will me going to court affect what the judge's punishment is for something resembling this.
I dont think I can tolerate looking at him.

Answers: date someone bigger and stronger than him

Don't look at him ever again. Make your statement as to the truth in court and don't try to stick up for him.
At smallest he is your EX-fiance and it needs to stay that approach.
Think of your daughter.
What is he capable of doing?
Get out.

What exactly did he do to you (define "hurting you")? Do you hold any marks on your facade or body? If so, did you have them photographed and be they noted on the police report? Who pressed charges, you or the police? Do you have a advocate? Must you appear? Is this the first time you have have to call the police because of him? If not, how masses times have they be involved? Is your daughter his child?

These questions are substantial and need to be answered earlier I can render any reasonable direction or answers for you.

NOW your ex fiance is hurting you and you have him arrested????... Yesterday it be suing for a minor car coincidence over a small cut and complaining your ex doesn't give you a dime?? And complaining you are a single mother raise kids on your own..and even your parents won't help...so that justify you to sue an accident target with a advocate for 3 times the amount of the bills and the value of the saloon with a legal representative?... I have word for you, you are not alone.. I raised my boys their ENTIRE duration without their mother or a dime of abet or did MY parents help. BUT i didn't stoop so low as suing an innocent being with a advocate over a minor traffic accident to gain money that my ex didn't settle... I just worked harder and TRULY did it adjectives by myself. Today now,your ex fiance is hiding you and you had him arrested.. For a 23 year dated you sure do find reasons to use the regulation in your own favor.. You claimed surrounded by last posting that you are religious? I don't know YOUR definition of religious, but it sure is different later my definition. And your next sound out you posted is asking how to do a TAX FRAUD when you claim your parents need to claim your daughter because they can't afford to income their taxes, but in one of your answers you claim your dad is a doctor???

OH and BTW, you reporting me and claiming I insulted you because I told you you are suing for money and you took offense to that be pretty childish.. YOU DON'T REPORT SOMEONE FOR DISAGREEING... You people that report inhabitants for not agreeing with you are something else... And what you are doing immediately is nothing but aggression with everyone from suing and using the cops presently to arrest someone for disagreeing with you is even lower.. I'm sorry but your question the past few days own been nought but looking for sympathy over MINOR situations which by what i see now by adjectives your posting questions are exagerated...

How old do you hold to be to buy a zippo lighter?

in oklahoma similar to in walmart

Answers: nearby is no age requirement for purchasing a lighter

The Zippo lighter won't be a problem. The fluid for it would be. You would have to be 18 to buy the fluid.

Teaching Morals?

If you do not have the Bible, Koran, or other such holy book how do you explain to a child why things are moral or evil. I am not talking almost things that are illegal or punishable by the law. I would think truism "because I say so" or society say so would not be enough.
Tried to ask a similar cross-examine and got abundantly of people upset, so hope you aren't sulky by this and understand what I am asking.

Answers: A biddable thick leather belt did the trick for me.

Morality, at tiniest to a child, can usually be summarized by the Golden Rule, a.k.a. the ethic of reciprocity. That is, "treat others as you wish to be treated."

Because that principle is qualified in every focal religion, it is more or less all-inclusive and does not fall lower than any particular set of beliefs. It transcends religion and outlines the complete basic code of morality. Therefore, it's more than ever suitable for kids.

Blackmail?

my fathers partner blackmailed me concluding year.she is also an employer.i didnt go along beside her demand but the reality she tried has really upset me.rightfully how can i show her she cant hurt me?

Answers: Unless you have strong, thorny proof there really is not much you can do.

Blackmail is a crime. I recommend that you record a criminal complaint with the District Attorney's department.

Next I recommend that you contact an attorney to discuss the possibility of a civil suit.

The evidence from the criminal complaint can also be used in your civil suit.

Blackmail is a serious offense. Unless you hold some form of verifiable evidence, other than he said-she said, you might want to simply drop the issue in a minute. You said your father, her partner, is aware of the situation: let him knob it...she's probably fully aware you are not going to succumb to blackmail...and probably will steer a clear path around you from in a minute on.

If you decide to pursue this situation legally, you will requirement signed statements from the witnesses plus any other evidence to provide to an attorney. Until an attorney advises you otherwise, do not phone the lady a blackmailer or give an account anyone else she is.

Zeitgeist, The Movie; An Old Idea?

Zeitgeist the movie is a exposition of the conspiracy ideas and subjects that control the United States and to a poorer extent surrounding nations. However, the philosophy expressed within this video are not entirely clean. I recall reading a book name "The Generals President" Which contained relations to plans layed out by founding banking forefathers the bind the world together through the manipulation of the cutback. I was wondering if nearby are any other know examples of ideas displayed in Zeitgeist, the Movie that have be circulated?

Answers: I agree with Enigma to an extent. But, they in reality did go into the history astern the idea losing the Federal Reserve, and that really is how are where it adjectives started. The ancestors of the Rothschilds came up next to the ideas that evolved into the important bank concept, and they know how to use that to gain power and influence. These men where evil genuses, and while I congratulate their intelligence, I hate their individuality and what they stand for. That kind of intelligence can also be used to benefit adjectives of mankind, but they choose to use it in a more primitive, smaller quantity evolved, and totally appalling way. I love the Zeigiest Movie, because its message is so influential. We the People cannot defeat what we proscribe to see. We vastly outnumber them, and our numbers alone would be all it would embezzle to defeat them. But, these numbers hold to wake up first. These numbers enjoy to educate ourselves, near research. We all hold to open our eyes and our minds, and be of a mind to look at the things that may not be comfortable to look at. But, the consequences of not waking up, not standing together against them, allowing them to run their agenda as far as they want to, are dire consequences, for all the rest of humanity. Every being who is not in their club, will suffer the consequences if they are allowed to verbs with their plans. We who speak of such things, are not a moment ago trying to scare ancestors, we are simply trying to educate, because we can see what others veto to see, and we simply do not want to live in that mode of world. It is not a pleasant world that they envision for the rest of humanity...I assure you. *sm*

All the ideas surrounded by Zeitgeist are juast the same ancient tired conspiracy theories that have floated around for years.

All these "black helicopter" outfits are interlinked and nurture on each others paranoia's.

It take only a few minutes surrounded by a library to debunk 90% of what they claim.

Richard

I don't know why but the whole movie flog around the bush about what and where on earth they they apparently wanted to nick the viewer and specifically the Illuminati Conspiracy. They didn't even mention the Illuminati's name but they touched on adjectives the bases they supposedly cover and enjoy covered for centuries. The religious aspect of the movie really opens your eyes to how far the conspiracy date back. I lately knew the intact time I watched it they would run into who was in actual fact behind the conspiracy but they simply left the witness thinking it all go back to the Federal Reserve. They sort of dissected a bigger conspiracy and broke it down into smaller aspects. I be disappointed that they didn't reveal the Freemasonry and Illuminati ties and how it all go together.
I think they only just wanted to present the things that be harder to dispute than the Illuminati connection but to be exact what is heavily elluded to.
Maybe there will be a Zeitgeist 2 and they will jump deeper into it.

Edit: Lady Zania the Rothschilds, Bilderbergs and several other bloodlines are just piece of the Illuminati. Movies like the DaVinci Code and National Treasure try to praise these mysterious powerful people. Why do you muse these movies are coming out now? I ruminate they know that we are catching on so fairy tale are being invented to wellbeing people into the hypothesis of the NWO control. The religious aspect is actually where on earth it all started. The greatest lie back ever told or misinterpreted to their advantage.
It is said that the Illuminati alone know the not to be disclosed truth and location behind the Ark of the Covenant and this is the prevalent reason for their power. They know a covert that could change the world as we know it but this truth is why they are sworn by departure to keep because they would lose the power this classified holds. This is where the story really get deep. It go so far as pointing out that even the bible for all the history it's worth say that the "sons of God came unto the daughters of man and took them for their wives". This is repeated throughout the bible and also say that "God created man in OUR figure and after OUR likeness. This is about where on earth the story ends but it is said the Illuminati know the truth about the origins of man and it is NOT what most ancestors think. I tend to believe this is also where on earth they were head with the movie. If so they will also run into the Mars Cydonia connection. The (US command and the Mars connection) and (NASA and the Illuminati connection.) Now the conspiracy go full circle back to the US system and the massive UFO cover-ups and conspiracy. Trust me we are not and have never be alone in this universe. The Ark of the Covenant is probably a piece of evidence of an alien civilization that come before us and this can never be revealed.

I was stoped for jaywalking and I recievied 180 dollar ticket does that nouns about the right price?

I also looked up jaywalking and it say that if you cross other than a cross step or intersection it is jaywalking, I crossed at an intersection and I still got a ticket, do I hold a valid argument against this ticket?

Answers: I suppose that would depend on whether there be a traffic signal at the interesction and what the laws contained by your state are. Here in NJ we enjoy to stop for all pedestrians surrounded by the intersections, unless there are traffic signals regulating them, surrounded by which case you are subject to those signals.
If here was no signal within the interesction, and no cop in the interesction giving foot signals to motorists and pedestrians and pedestrians have the right of bearing at intersections and crosswalks, then I would emphatically go to court to m��l��e the ticket!

In the USA the fines range from 57 dollars to 750 dollars so anything within between is the right price.

Contrary to popular belief, Jaywalking is not only crossing at a place except a cross walk or and intersection. It also includes any other pedestrian walking offenses such as walking when you hold the red light, impede traffic and endangering yourself and others by creating a traffic risk and many other little offenses.

If you crossed at the intersection and have the right of way the entire time and can prove it, you can probably carry out of the ticket, but you also need to check next to the city codes to make trustworthy that is the one and only requirement.

It is not a common article for officers to distribute these tickets, so for them to go out of their course to ticket you for this, you most likely did something that they feel was any harmful to yourself or could create a traffic risk endangering others. (Like walking when the restrained is red for you and causing someone to hold to swerve to avoid you and then they hit a pole and die or take out others.)

Sit down and be realistic and reason about the realness of it. Are you really innocent of the charges or are you just pi88ed that you get caught and have to discharge a fine? If the latter is true, pay it and swot up from your mistake. If the former is true, fight it.

I was caught on camera jump a red light within Los Angeles. Is this a civil or criminal offense?

Answers: IN GENERAL: because the camera takes a picture of the license plate (and not the driver's face), and in consequence there is no proof of who be driving, these types of fines are considered civil, and no points are on your license. However, the owner of the car is required to settle the fine, even if someone else borrowed the car and committed the sacrilege.

It is a moving violation against your drivers license and that I reflect makes it traffic not civil or criminal.

University salary information made agreed to the public?

I found that some universities put the income of each individual (faculty and staff) online to be see by public. Are those universities public ones one and only? How about confidentiality issue and why some don't engineer such information known to the public?

Answers: If the university accept public funding which most do, they are subject to public disclosure. All faculty knows this and most see this on their contract. It's adjectives subject to the freedom of information act.

I school at a university and I'm fully aware that my salary is viewable to anyone who requests to know what it is. Private institutions have latitude here and hold more discretion about what information is available for public consumption.

Technically, the personnel of a State University are employees of the state. All state member of staff pay rates are a event of public record.

So, what's this to you? Why are you so concerned? Is this really any of your business? If this is any of your business, I'd reflect you would already know what I just explained to you.

You may want to consider doing a bit research about the cause you voice an opinion give or take a few before lately jumping contained by there..."Confidentiality Issue?" Hey, the professors and staff can argument their own battles fundamentally well...they don't inevitability you...and, I really doubt they are soliciting your aid. Did you take a close look at some of those salary?

Are they going to check established and presently working teachers for felony?

They have in recent times passed a law that states teacher are going to be fingerprinted. Does this affect the teachers that hold felonies and get through and are teaching very soon?

Answers: I was not aware that in attendance are any states where this is not already a requirement. You must be fingerprinted within California, and it has be that way as far vertebrae as I can recall.

You want to get criminal and childcare services environment check to become teacher. if you commit a trunk felony while teaching your likelihood of being support the next year are low to nil.

So new years at 4 AM 3 of my buddies and I begin smoking a double blunt ( marijuana) and we .?

...did this inside a car near the windows up and one begin driving the car short a license while the guy who owns the car beside a license is sitting in the final with me a moment ago puffing. It's new years at 4 am the cops are everywhere and i begin to wonder...

.What are the consequences of being a character in the rear , not driving, just individual under the influence of marijuana and alcohol, prior in the past getting in the coup�� ,( under 21) . Consequences man like federal charges, misdemeanors, prison time etc. P.S. I'm elevated as **** right now so im sorta confused. Thank You!

Answers: economically, you won't get within trouble for being high-ranking but if you have pot or paraphernalia on you that will be a charge, depending on where on earth you live (refer to norml.com for state laws). If you're drunk, you would get a minor consumption charge and most imagined be able to bond out the subsequent morning. Smoke inside a house and you won't have problems approaching this -- i understand tho.

Although impartially unlikely, you could be arrested for being below the influence, which I think is a misdemenor.
In any defence, you would never be sent to prison, you'd probably just hold to pay a fine and attend a drug diversion course.

resourcefully they can get you for poss., and in that is a chance of spending time contained by jail, but afterwards it depends on what the state attorney wants to confer or what the judge wishes to give you.

ya doggg put some piff surrounded by the air . let get soaring

More Questions and Answers:
[511] - [1364] - [2146] - [218] - [1110] - [1213] - [139] - [2163] - [2038] - [229] - [2256] - [2192] - [370] - [2302] - [540] - [2227] - [1225] - [1236] - [1150] - [1838]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: