Law Questions and Answers

Family law/child support in michigan?

my husband and i hold full physical/joint legal custody of his 3 children. they are 11 and twins that are 9. its be almost 8 years since she gave them to us, happily, almost forcably. i have gone online to check how they amount out the child support, because i think she is somehow paying far smaller amount than she should be. she pays $30 a week. they based it on when minimum wage be $5.25. she is the manager at burger king and have been within for over 6 years and also works at subway. i cant imagine she is still making one and only $5.25 an hour.
also, in michigan the non custodial parent must wage insurance, she does not. we have a bulk of it covered through work, but the copays and medication costs are slaughter us. the 11 year old is bipolar and adhd and one of the twins have severe allergies.

i also have a daughter and we hold a 5 year old son together. a total of 7 contained by the house. the reason i ask is because we are contained by financial ruin. we have already file chapter 13 and will probably have to step

Answers: WOW TAKE HER BACK TO COURT.I HAVE CUSTODY OF MY DAUGHTER 5 DAYS A WEEK AND STILL HAVE TO PAY 110.00 A WEEK IN PA.I STILL HATE THE CHILD SUPPORT SYSTEM HERE BUT IT IS REALLY CLOSE TO YOURS.YOU ARE GETTING SCREWED BUT THIS DOESN'T SURPRISE ME.BE CAREFUL SHE DOESN'T COME IN THE BACK DOOR TO TAKE THEM BACK DUE TO YOUR UNSTABLE ATMOSPHERE.

You are free to go vertebrae to court and ask for a review of her wages. That's the legal road to do it.

She will have to comply or frontage arrest.

Stop with the drama - catch a lawyer and do it.

Parental rights termination question contained by Arkansas?

If the mother's rights are terminated in the state of AK, are the father's rights automatically terminated also? Or does the father hold to be found unfit as well? Assuming they are divorced.

Answers: Nothing is assumed within family directive - or any other type of law, come to that. No, no, but you nevertheless must familiarlize yourself near http://library.adoption.com/termination-...

Abandonment or Extreme Parental Disinterest

Abuse/Neglect

Mental Illness or Deficiency

Felony Conviction/Incarceration

Failure of Reasonable Efforts

Abuse/Neglect or Loss of Rights of Another Child

Sexual Abuse

Circumstances That Are Not Grounds for Termination

Alcohol or Drug Induced Incapacity

Failure to Establish Paternity

Full Text of Statute

Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-341(a)-(c) (West, WESTLAW through Ark. 2003 Legis. Serv., Acts 1166 & 1319)

This section shall be a remedy available one and only to the Department of Human Services or a court-appointed attorney ad litem. It shall not be available for private litigants or other agencies. It shall be used singular in such cases when the Department of Human Services is attempting to clear a juvenile for irreparable placement. The intent of this section is to provide permanency contained by a juvenile's life contained by all instances where on earth return of a juvenile to the family home is contrary to the juvenile's robustness, safety, or welfare, and it appears from the evidence that return to the home home cannot be accomplished contained by a reasonable interval of time, as viewed from the juvenile's perspective.

The court may consider a petition to end parental rights if the court finds that there is an appropriate permanency placement plan for the juvenile.

This subsection does not require that a permanency planning hearing be held as a prerequisite to the file of a petition to terminate parental rights, or as a prerequisite to the court considering a petition to cancel parental rights.

The petitioner shall provide the parent, parents, or putative parent actual or constructive notice of a petition to stop midstream parental rights. An order forever terminate parental rights shall be based upon a finding by clear and convincing evidence:

That it is within the best interest of the juvenile, including consideration of the likelihood that the juvenile will be adopt if the termination petition is granted; and the potential harm, specifically address the effect on the health and sanctuary of the child, caused by continuing contact beside the parent, parents, or putative parent;

Of one or more of the following grounds: that a juvenile has be adjudicated by the court to be dependent-neglected and have continued out of the custody of the parent for 12 months, and, despite a meaningful shot by the Department of Human Services to rehabilitate the parents and correct the conditions which caused removal, those conditions enjoy not been remedied by the parent. It is not needed that the 12-month period in half a shake precede the filing of the petition for termination of parental rights, or that it be for 12 consecutive months; or the juvenile have lived outside the home of the parent for a period of 12 months, and the parent have willfully failed to provide significant textile support in accordance beside the parent's means or to allege meaningful contact near the juvenile. To find willful failure to verbs meaningful contact, it must be shown that the parent be not prevented from visiting or have contact with the juvenile by the juvenile's custodian or any other character, taking into consideration the distance of the juvenile's placement from the parent's home. It is not necessary that the 12-month extent immediately precede the file of the petition for termination of parental rights, or that it be for 12 consecutive months;
The presumptive legal father is not the biological father of the juvenile, and the welfare of the juvenile can best be served by terminate the parental rights of such presumptive legal father;

A parent have abandoned the juvenile;

A parent have executed consent to termination of parental rights or adoption of the juvenile, subject to the court's approval;

The juvenile court has found the juvenile subject dependent-neglected as a result of neglect or swearing that could endanger the life of the child, sexual mishandle, or sexual exploitation, and which was perpetrate by the juvenile's parent or parents. Such findings by the juvenile court shall constitute grounds for immediate termination of the parental rights of one or both of the parents.

Such findings by the juvenile court shall constitute grounds for direct termination of the parental rights of one or both of the parents:

That, subsequent to the filing of the inventive petition for dependency-neglect, other factors or issues arose which demonstrate that return of the juvenile to the custody of the parents is contrary to the juvenile's vigour, safety, or welfare, and that, despite the hold out of appropriate family services, the parent have manifested the incapacity or indifference to remedy the subsequent issues or factor, or rehabilitate the parent's circumstances, which prevent return of the juvenile to the custody of the parents, provided, however, that the Department of Human Services shall make likely accommodations contained by accordance with the Americans near Disabilities Act to parents with disabilities within order to allow them shrewd access to reunification and family preservation services. For purposes of this subsection, said inability or incapacity to remedy or rehabilitate includes, but is not predetermined to, mental illness, wild illness, or mental deficiency;

The parent is sentenced in a criminal proceeding for a length of time which would constitute a substantial period of the juvenile's existence and the conditions of out-of-home placement for 12 months or more, due to being adjudicate dependent-neglected, with shortage of support and/or contact from the parent have also be established:

The parent is found by a court of competent jurisdiction, including the juvenile division of circuit court, to: have committed murder or voluntary manslaughter of any child, or to hold aided or abetted, attempted, conspired, or solicited to commit such murder or voluntary manslaughter; enjoy committed a felony battery or assault that results within serious bodily injury to any child; have subjected the child to aggravated circumstances; enjoy had his parental rights involuntarily terminated as to a sibling of the child; or enjoy abandoned an infant.

Nothing surrounded by this chapter shall be construed to require reunification of a surviving child with a parent who have been found guilty of any of the offenses planned in this subdivision.

An command terminating the relationship between parent and juvenile divests the parent and the juvenile of adjectives legal rights, powers, and obligation with respect to respectively other, including the right to withhold consent to adoption, except the right of the juvenile to inherit from the parent, which is terminated only by a final decree of adoption.

Termination of the relationship between a juvenile and one parent shall not affect the relationship between the juvenile and the other parent, if those rights are legally established. If no permitted rights have be established, a putative parent must prove that significant contacts existed with the juvenile contained by order for the putative parent's rights to attach.

When the petitioner have actual knowledge that an individual is claiming to be or is name as the putative parent of the juvenile and the paternity of the juvenile has not be judicially determined, the individual is entitled to notice of the petition to call a halt parental rights. The notice shall identify the rights sought to be terminated and those which may be terminated. The concentration shall further specify that the putative parent must prove that significant contacts existed with the juvenile for the putative parent's rights to attach.

An charge terminating parental rights lower than this section does not preclude adoptive parents from allowing contact between an adopt child and the birth sibling or other birth family member.

Hope that helps.

Falsely accused of shop-lifting by store manager?

after leaving check out I be stopped by police officers stating that they be called because managment have seen me place something surrounded by my cart that did not trademark it to check out (cornish hen)an that I i was going to be arrested for shop-lifting I showed them my reciept my daypack and person be searched (this happen in front of hundred of store charity donor in which I give my business cards to) I was ask for ID and told by police i be free to go I didn't seize as much as an we apologize for our mistake from store mang. What is my legal recourse if any

Answers: What do you want from it? Maybe a 1983 claim against the store head, but the cost to bring suit is not worth the damages that could be awarded. Sometimes sh`t happens and you only got to permit it go. I would newly tell as masses people not to shop at that store.

im sure you could gain something out of that man... i mean c'mon some stupid *** sued mcdonalds for their coffee anyone too hot or making them fat .
if you seriously doubt that you can carry something out of that then you're crazy. Go see a bunch of lawyer and see what they think tho... theres one bound to know.

None. Wow thats f***** up. Officers own it to good at the moment.

Jacquelyn is a moron, the police did nothing wrong, revise to read.
I would ask the manager for some sort of token gift or rebate of late for the pain he put you through. But don't expect any money.

Well, if consistent people that saw you know who you are, and you start notice people treating you differently - especially if you start losing business do you are labeled "Thief" (i don't know what business your cards entail) , THEN perhaps - if you own proof of this , you may secure a advocate. If THAT happens , i suppose you'd enjoy a case , and remember to subpoena the video evidence. Other than that, you'll simply have to swallow your pride , do it happens to adjectives of us.

"What is my legal recourse if any"

None.

Mistakes develop. Doesn't give you grounds for a successful lawsuit.

Richard

If you didn't steal anything and the store governor had you search you can take officially recognized actions against the store. It's against the statute to falsely impeach anyone for shoplifting. You might want to hire an attorney! Make the Manager accountable for her movements towards you. File a company complaint and pursue legal activities. Your rights were violated. When the officer detained you you should own asked for the report. To falsely detained someone is against the canon. It's not the officer's fault, he be just doing his work but the store manager be in the wrong. You can't of late assume someone stole someone, or think someone stole something. You own to witness the entire theft. If she saw you conceal merchandise and you walk out the store without paying for it consequently you are stealing but if they found nothing next that false arrest or false detainment.

Is it against the law to live on public manor? could you set up camp and merely stay as long as you want ?

im not talking more or less a park im talking around rural public land or inhospitable surroundings that isnt part of a national forest or private house.

Answers: You can't set up and live anywhere that is owned by someone who is not you in need that persons consent.

Public come to rest is owned by the general public, who own instructed a government agency to keep under surveillance over it for them.

Since you do not personally own it, you must receive the consent of the owners (the public); which you have not done.

Just sleeping and staying within wouldn't be illegal.

Setting up military camp would be.

It is illegal within most areas to do so.

Do i need legitimate help or an aplolgy?

aprox. 9 years ago i have a phone line contained by a relitives name near his permission,i get that phone shut off december 5th 2001.i be told by the phone co. that they wrote it off and allowed me to grasp a phone line surrounded by my name.iv recieved several post in the messages in this individuals name over this bill that be supose to be a write off,so i in recent times tossed them.now this party used his credit card back contained by oct 07 and is now truism that this company is going to start garnishing his check starting this friday jan 4th 08. i thought that before you grasp your check garnished that company have to take a being to court,and i heard that after 3 years the company couldnt do anything.so primarily the question is does a company entail to take you to court to be capable of garnish ones check,and is in that a statute of limitations?and is this person not self honest with me,-he's not shown me any proof of garnishment.please relief this could ruin a relationship that bearly there to start beside,thanks to his clean wife.

Answers: lots of collection agencies will outright lie to relatives to get them to reward. This threat could have be made by collectors or the guy could be lying to you.

Either way they inevitability a court order to accessories a check, AND it is illegal to trimmings checks for credit issues in some states.

Call rear the phone co. Verify that it was written sour. That may meat that you both now may own collection agencies tracking you. If the phone company wrote it off, that in recent times means you presently have a different agency trying to collect that amount. It doesn't anticipate it went away.

There is a statute of limitations, but check for your state what to be precise.

Garnishment of wages almost always requires the establish of a court. Statute of limitations vary by state and situation, but should unanimously be 5-10 years.

About 10 months ago, I was assaulted by my ex boyfriend.?

At that time I did not call for medical attention, just alot of bruising and a exceedingly sore arm! All I wanted be to get out of that situation as rapid as possible. But, since then, I hold had problems near my shoulder. Come to find out, the doctor says that at some time, I tore my rotator cuff which have led to more serious problems. It most predictable happened during the assault, although I can not prove that.
My examine is...Can I still press charges 10 months later contained by the state of Nebraska?

Answers: It would be impossible to prove that your injuries were cause by him and not by playing a sport, shopping or even wrestling with the dog... Let it be, you really own no evidence that this was cause by his abuse and not something else. You may be capable of prove assault BUT not the damages without medical evidence at the time of the injury.

you can press charges but i doubt it would hold up contained by court because of how long you waited to do anything around it. it was your choice to not call upon the police initially. next time you enjoy a crime committed against you of any kind hail as the police and file a report, you dont enjoy to press charges at that time but by filing a report you own LEGAL evidence of the infraction.

Imagine the three cases against medical companies being sued currently are driven by carers not humanitarian carees?

When a pharmacuetical company invests billions in conducting tests analysing and developing a modern medicine within mental health and after the patients sue these companies?

What drives such folk?

Research at Melbourne Uni points to cigarette smoking as causative, how can this not be the case within large class engagements?

Surely everything we do in go is a choice? If weight gain be an option and folks did nought to prevent the onset, ie the psychiatrist, the carer, the mental strength team, the merciful and even the patients friend and family, is this because not a soul truly cares nearly the person? Imagine it be just the money to be made lone because you could sue and a carers pension isnt much?

Surely by adjectives off the appendage that feeds it, we are creating a monster where on earth no work can get done and no merciful healed?

Answers: We can nurture too much and kill the tolerant. The US President, Abraham Lincoln was found not kill by an assasins bullet, but by his doctors who over treated him for the gun shot. We need to find a go together. As to law suits, associates expect too much from medicine. There is too heaps variables in the human body to experiment for every possibilities. We actually know immensely little about most drugs and their side effects. Other than aspirin how abundant drugs do we know of that we can do long term use studies. Do empire really think we would know how a drug effect the body after 30 years of use if the drug individual existed several years ago. When people are sick, they have need of to blame someone otehr than themselves. I've seen drug trial as all right and have see how drug companies manipulate facts. there is no best system.

Can I ask for a Motion to Negotiate in Circuit Court within MI for Defamation, Slander case? If so than how?

Best answer receive the points.

Answers: You can ask for whatever you want. I hold no idea if it would be appropriate contained by your case. Ask the court clerk for the form.

Censorship in Australia?

This query is out to all relations who live in australia. The censorship law are stupid, they say that you cant buy x rate movies in the states but you can writ them over the next from the terratoris and own them sent to you. It would be better if you could just buy them legitimately in your home state, isnt it newly stupid.

Answers: I agree it is silly and I'm not sure on the motivations but I think it's financial or perchance it was purely a silly system that got stuck. Anyway you can still access X rate videos it's only a bit more effort.

How can you be against death cost and for abortion.?

That means you believe we should not decimate criminals who have committed premeditated murder. But it is okay to kill in cold blood an innocent baby who have not committed a sin. I am personally against both though

Answers: "I am aware of the situation of both, and follow the consequences, yet I don't consider wrong any one of them" that's an answer a contradictory person may impart, another one is." I am against death cost and pro-abortion because you can consider a baby single when you are outside the womb, but killers and rapist and criminals deserved to wages for their crime"...Typical answer of a person that won't see further after his(her) nose beside tunnel vision--and you may find many variation of aberration towards life--like suicidal thoughts, criminal desires, pathetic revenge,arrogance contained by madness- hate and ignorance or only just plain stupidity and evilness...but for those that LOVE GOD (not only "know Him") those things are against God's plans for us...He told us: LOVE respectively others like I hold LOVED YOU, be Holy like my father is Holy. Love God above adjectives things with adjectives your heart, all your mind, adjectives your strenght, all your mortal...and then Love your neighbor as you love yourself...in a minute if we don't do that who is going to pay for it?.those that won't comply...right? ok! immediately who's for abortion? who's for the death cost?. People that won't understand that, who's that? the ones that don't love God!you can't love God and Kill!!for if you do, beside the rule you measure beside, you'll be mesured by!

They don't consider the fetus to be human yet, lately a clump of cells, beside no conscious or soul. They also often trademark a woman's right case roughly it, claiming it is a woman's body, and she should have total control over it, within relation to abortion. I'm all for frying convicted killer, but I'm against abortion.

I'm not debating with you over whether or not it's alive or not, I'm only telling you their (abortionists / pro-choicers) rationale.

It's not a toddler at that stage which is why I'm not against early-term abortions. It's a lump of cells. Yes it have the potential to become a baby but it is not one. And beforehand their nervous system is developed they can't consistency pain. They also do not hold awareness. Abortion isn't nice and should be avoided but if it would mess up the life of the mother or even the child (yes some people do hold miserable lives and yes in some cases this could own been avoided by abortion, how more or less a drug addict near three other starving/abused/deformed kids for example).

I'm on the fence for the passing penalty for really doomed to failure crimes, but tend to sway against it. The main idea being that you can't achieve 100% proof of guilt. Also that it's really hypocritical.

I think most satisfactory people would articulate a nine-month-old fetus, ready to be born, viable outside the mother, is a human self, a baby. But a single-celled zygote, a fertilized egg, is -not-. For a long time it be a serious mystery as to just where on earth in that process natural life begins.

The result that life begin when the sperm hits the egg is an artificial and arbitrary decision. I it is not medical, it is not even biblical. Someone deliberately made that conclusion for purposes having to do more next to politics than with spirituality or God's will or anything close to that. It's been sold to you as factor and parcel of your religion, something to be believed uncritically, not to be thought about.

But near are a lot of relations who are not as bound by religious teaching and doctrine as you are, and who meditate these things out for themselves. Some of these people will come down favoring impulsive abortions because they don't believe a little lump of tissue too small to see, one thousandth the complexity of the brain of a housefly, is a human man.

A lot of these people also see that wherewithal punishment is not effective. Just from a practical perspective, it have never been proven a deterrent to crime, and it costs more than enthusiasm imprisonment lacking possibility of parole.

And in the later few years literally HUNDREDS of people hold been released from prison after DNA showed they didn't commit crimes for which they be convicted. Many of these people have been contained by prison for decades!

There is no telling if anyone be executed unfairly because the standard practice is to verbs all the evidence from the trial after a prisoner is executed. But seeing how mortal our justice system is, I contemplate this alone is enough to brand one not favor the death cost.

But of course this is also something that's module of your faith, isn't it? Something you don't query, don't think something like too deeply, don't discuss, you only accept it and believe it. If that works for you, in good health, more power to you. But not all of us are close to that.

Well, the abortion question is largely nearly when you believe that human life begin. There's no clear answer to that, because you can define it as pre-conception or actual conception, when the heart starts to give a hiding, when it can live on its own, or when actual birth takes place. There's also the immensely messy question something like women's rights and the disadvantages a single mother has. You can muddy the waters further when rape and incest are involved.

In the annihilation penalty, it's clear that you're taking a human duration. There are problems with the demise penalty, especially since some own been put to annihilation that were wrongly convicted. There's also mixed evidence as to whether crime in actuality decreases because of the demise penalty. It might not be an decisive punishment, and some consider it barbaric.

Some consider abortion barbaric as well. Since nearby are so many messy question involved for both, and they are largely answered by your own beliefs and heart, it's tough to get definitive answers on any.

there's a whole lot more that factor in into abortion and the demise penalty. ultimately, the majority of citizens who want an abortion is because they made a mistake. the reason family want the death cost is because someone did something against the law.
various feel that abortion is wrong because the fetuses arent given a casual in the world. i articulate, isnt it better to take the hit and miss of living away from someone that hasnt yet lived? someone who doesnt know what distress or pleasure is?

it's the general concencus that anything worth the destruction penalty is wrong. but man pregnant and making a mistake and being pregnant is in recent times that, a mistake, not a wrong.

i suppose i hadnt really thought about it up to that time, but i guess to some extent, i'm for both. i do, however, believe in rehabilitation more than raise a child in awful conditions and have it come out fine.
i suppose that many culture worth the death cost or a long sentence probably had that childhood.

Well in that are plenty of people who are for abortion and against the release penalty and vice versa. Why? The great majority of relatives do not approach these particular issues logically because of the thickset emotional and religious elements that surround them. If you are competent to look at these issues from a ***completely*** detached perspective there are most imagined individual situations where you would support and reject both. Abortion boils down to one simple point. When is life natural life? The death cost boils down to one thing. When, if ever, is a crime so wounding to society that the person committing it is determined to be beyond the mercy of the individuals that make up his or her community. I will not lift this opportunity to advocate a side for any issue but I do believe firmly that neither issue will ever be resolved completely because people will other lead near their emotions and make tracks their brains somewhere in tow.

More Questions and Answers:
[620] - [12] - [1263] - [1624] - [770] - [753] - [1506] - [51] - [1658] - [745] - [1069] - [1802] - [2423] - [1936] - [2233] - [2323] - [1448] - [2178] - [1450] - [214]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: