Law Questions and Answers
Checking my answers, can you help me out?
1. police arrive at a gang-members hideout next to a warrant to search the premises. The police believe that the gang-member is contained by the premises, is armed, and is inclined to use his weapon against them. May the police enter the premises without announcement? Why or why not?- yes because the suspect is a threat to the police
2. police come to the home of the defendant, who be suspected of robbing a coin shop. The police have an arrest warrant but no check out warrant. After arresting the defendant, the police conduct a full-scale search of the house and find the stolen coins. Is the scrabble permissible? Why or Why not?
- no because a investigate warrant is needed to search private property.
Answers: yaah its correct well brought-up job :D
Looks right. Simple answers, but they seemt to be correct.
How can i get full custody of my son and afford his father certain visitation rights?
My sons biological father is not on the birth warrant. There is not a parenting plan in effect. We be never married. The sons grandmother is threating to take custody of my son. Under Washington State tenet does she have the right to lug my son. I have no common sense to be a unfit mother, but i do dance at a gentelmens club cut time. Trying to support my son and go to conservatory. I also have a boyfriend which i only just found out he is the father of my unborn child. Also we have planned on getting married. What im trying to attain at is i want full custody of my son, allowing his father certain visitation rights. Your know-how would be greatly appreciated. Thank youAnswers: I don't know about Washington Law specifically, but surrounded by most states, you have nil to worry nearly unless you can be proven to be an unfit mother. Even then the grandmother isn't going to be given custody. Social Services would come surrounded by, do evaluation etc.. in the worst casing scenario the child would be removed from the home and given to the most suitable next of kin. The Birth father would be the first choice, unless he is unfit or unwilling. After that, it would "typically" walk to a member of your people. Then if they are unwilling/unfit, the paternal GM can petition the court to be temp. custodian. Then social services re-evaluates you and determines if you are at that time fit. If so, you obtain the child. If not the temp. cust. can petition the court for full custody.
It doesn't matter what your situation is (unless its illegal), your marital status doesn't business (anymore) its all something like the most suitable environment for the child and who can provide for the child.
If you are wanting something on paper as for visitation, afterwards you just want to get the papers drawn up and hold him sign them with the vocabulary of agreement. That part is simple.
As for the caring GM, tell her to stick it. She's full of crap.
Grandparents rights are "typically" more give or take a few denying them visitation.
First, you don't "allow" "certain" visitation rights to the father of your child. As the father, he has full right of access to his child...lately the same as you do.
If you want "primary" custody of your son legalized, find a lawyer and shift to court and ask for it. The father can dispute this arrangement and ask for shared custody if he wants.the intermediary would probably award it as long as you or the father are not unfit parents.
You don't get a utter in visitation. The court will work beside the father and set whatever visitations the father requirements. If it's shared custody, it could be the child will spend 50% of the time with you and 50% beside the father.
Just because you provided the womb for this child doesn't mean you attain to call adjectives the shots. The father has as much rights as you do beside regard to the kid.
And, the grandmother can without doubt apply for custody of the child...that is her right. Whether or not she would carry it would depend upon many things..first would be if YOU are considered and proved to be unfit -and- the father is considered and proved to be unfit.
As to your fitness, it would relief if you weren't a stripper, if you didn't have a live-in boyfriend and weren't pregnant AGAIN out of marriage vows with another man. Keep surrounded by mind, the judge will want what is the BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD..not what you want - or what the father wants. If the peacemaker decides that grandma would provide a more stable home environment for the child, later she will get custody.
You call for to get a advocate as quick as possible.
Does Washington enjoy a 'Grandparents responsibility' law? Is the state pay packet aid and collecting from Grandmother? If they are then grandmother can petition for custody as supporting entity. You're not collecting stat taxpayer money are you? Is father providing any support money? Can his family provide a established home within best interests of child? What kind of home are you providing? Would the child be better sour in a establish home near the father and his family or some student housing near a mother not of 'proper' moral character? Judge may ask these questions- what would you answer?
Child Support Enforcement, is it an un-Constitutional contradiction, or legalized mafia?
The 13th Amendent states the following things are ILLEGALPeonage is defined as involuntary servitude tied to the paying of a debt (CHILD SUPPORT) by the use of force (WAGE GARNISHMENT) or the threat of force
Involuntary Servitude is defined as people at the rear held by
1) Actual force
2) Threats of force
3) Threats of legal coercion (suffer legalized consequences unless compliant with DEMANDS placed on them) *funny how they beckon child support payments "voluntary"
Forced Labor is defined as
1) Labor or SERVICE (child support payment-wage garnishment) obtained by threats of serious injure or physical restraint (READ JAIL)
2) Means of a scheme, plan, or shape intended to cause a being to believe they would suffer physical restraint (JAIL) if they did not PERFORM (funny how they use this word here too!) such labor or services
Support payment amounts should be required from both party placed in a reserves account, BOTH party then responsible, two made the child
Answers: Conceiving a child eagerly, knowing the risks, is certainly not involuntary. The Thirteenth Amendment does not apply.
I do agree some rearrange is needed in how the money is spent. There is nought governing how the custodial parent spends the funds.
The 13th Amendments intent was to abolish slavery and prohibit involuntary servitude. Not AT ALL what you are conversation about. Here's what it say...
"Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime where of the entertainment shall have be duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Section 2. Congress shall own the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation."
How do you define involuntary servitude? "as ancestors behind by..." What? Here is what involuntary servitude mode. It
refers to a person held by actual force, threats of force, or threats of legitimate coercion in a condition of slavery-- compulsory service or labor against his or her will. This also includes the condition surrounded by which people are compelled to work against their will by a "climate of fear" evoked by the use of force, the threat of force, or the threat of permissible coercion."
Sorry, dude...you can't use the 13th Amendment as an argument to not support your kid. I don't believe you are in conditions of slavery. Try again.
:
Child Support Enforcement is base upon peoples' CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS with the state through such things as birth certificate, marriage license, divorce agreements, and even by tacit procuration, etc.
Granted, peonage is not permitted except by way of CONTRACT, whether quasi-, or implied.
A character must sever that bond before claiming despoliation of that amendment.
Wow, I guess anything can be skewed based on your perception of an event or movement.
The 13th amendment was against slavery. You comparing one forced to pay child support to actual slavery is a banter, isn't it? Surely, you are not serious.
Slavery was tied to the involuntary use of family for the owners benefit. Child support is a debt created by your own activity. At the point the state steps surrounded by for wage garnishment, a person have already missed many payments and hold shown that they don't have the means or desire to take attention to detail of your obligation. They are simply a debtor who doesn't apparently desire to wage a debt. The sad segment is this is a debt of their own creation (their children) and the children are the ultimate beneficiaries of the payments. If a personality was looking for a permitted loophole around this issue, I would consider that a sign of a person's character. If they can't or don't want to manufacture good on this responsibility, then what duty (contract) would they ever be convicted to follow-through on?
A savings explanation? Child support money is to assist the custodial parent in providing for the child. You know keeping a roof over the child's skipper, putting food in their mouth, clothes on their back, medical bills, daycare bills.etc. The non-custodial parent contributes financially as if he/she were still within the household.
Reasons People Are Denied Health Care?
Hey everyone, i'm doing a project on Health Care for class, and i was wonder if anyone brand new a site or has a roll with reason why people are denied form care from different insurance companies. Thank you completely much for the help, i really apriciate it!!Answers: Pre-existing condition, age, history of smoking, drug use, or alcohol, non-disclosed vigour issues, etc. It all boils down to one point: $$$$! The insurance companies don't want to pay out any money.
I'm not 100% clear on the examine. If you are asking why people are uninsurable, here is a site that will aid you:
http://www.calhealth.net/Insurable.htm
If you are asking why insured people are DENIED coverage for something, i.e. another story. Enlightening testimony here:
http://www.thenationalcoalition.org/DrPe...
because you are not sick...
What,s the best way to oblige teenager b4 they find their driver license?
what i think at the age of 12 they should start taking deterrent drinving class at school until they take to 16 or 18 to get their license they will be aware of what they getting too,it should mandatory within all college in america.its must be a regulation.Answers: Practice driving and know about traffic rules contained by order to readily apply for a driver's license upon reaching the age of 16.
the have need of to read the states traffic laws.
Someone give me some obedient legal proposal?
I was near my girlfriend in walmart, and she be chased after attempting to shoplift. We both ran within opposite directions, I be tackled, knock unconscious and suffered leader trauma, causing me to be in motion to the hospital and have to own staples (yes staples, like the ones you put quality newspaper together with, not stitches). Is this grounds to sue? I didn't enjoy any stolen property on me.Answers: Not on Yahoo Answers, they can't. Want good court advice? Consult an attorney where on earth you live.
Want bad permissible advice? Take the suggestions of slapdash strangers on an online service. Even law students (and I am one) can solely give doomed to failure legal proposal.
I am not a lawyer but surrounded by tort law, "defense of property" is the one and only defense the store would probably have and they are singular allowed to use reasonable force. (If they detained you, they could possibly exercise the shopkeeper's privilege as well).
The leading issue would be whether the store was using temperate force, because they obviously treated you as an associate, even though you didn't have the stolen property on you.
If you hold serious head trauma from them I would call for an attorney to see what your options are because you hold definitely suffered damages.
The certainty that you ran probably give reason for suspicion. You specifically want to talk near an attorney. Legal help surrounded by time of need is paramount. If you pursue this be sure to enjoy your facts straight. Question. What happened to your girlfriend?
What is the minimum age to purchase a HANDGUN in michigan?
Please provide links to any information you find. ThanksAnswers: the Federal Law say that anyone has to be at lowest possible 21 years old surrounded by this country. States cannot make an exception.
Interesting side facts, a black powder pistol such as those carried by civil war soldiers can be purchased as replicas. They are not reasonably guns according to federal statutes, but maybe state law say different. I bought my first .44 when I be 16 years old. I have to wait until four years after I together the navy, and one year after I carried an M-14 on a ship beforehand I could legally buy a pistol.
Thank you, thank you, you really similar to me.
21, just as John Galt said.
"Who is John Galt?", you might ask.
...but if you ask, you already know.
21 countrywide. Check BATF
How does one go almost getting emancipated from their parents?
i have no intention of doing so but i of late wanted to know what does the situation at home hold to be like and what happen from there. and what rights do you enjoy once your emancipated?Answers: First you need to get hold of an attorney and then enjoy him/her petition the court and convince a judge that you hold cause to be properly free of your parents prior to your 18th birthday. This is a fairly adjectives practice in California where on earth child actors recurrently want independence and protection of their income from their parents prior to turning 18. Regarding what rights you would hold once this process is successful, laws can oscillate from state to state so its best to check with a local attorney.
Well, surrounded by fact, it's glib as pie to leave home. They can't stop you. What MIGHT stop you next is if you screw up and you want these ethnic group to subsidize you for post-secondary education - the solitary way most of us attain anywhere. (And pssst- it works better if you do it when you're young. I can count on two fingers the opportunity available if you get A LATE DEGREE. (It's nearby but who cares?)
Reality: If you walk off home at 16, (in most jurisdictions) you absolve parents/guardians of actually HAVING (legal responsibility) to contribute to your teaching.
Can you get within trouble if you are drug tested and they find ecstasy/weed has be in your system?
or do they own to catch you next to it or under the influence at the moment?Answers: You can its call "internal possession" but its usually added on as a charge when you are arrested for dui/possession/sales...its not something that you just obtain arrested for randomly
if you are on probabtion/parole than ya you can grasp in trouble only for peeing dirty
If you are drug-tested and positive, then you'll be sent to lock-up impending hospital report to confirm that you are really positive for ecstacy. There are some cases where some individuals were tested positive during the urine-test but be declared free from drugs by the hospital.
If they catch you near it, then you will be charged next to possession of or attempt to distribute drugs, of which the punishments prescribed are heavier than being tested positive for drug invective.
Usually the police will conduct indiscriminate testing when they mugging discos or pubs. So you maybe without blemish sound but if you whip it, then be prepared to spent few night in the lock-up.
adjectives i have to vote is drink lots of water.
Is this legal?
The police are chasing a suspect who is carrying a small amount of drugs surrounded by order to arrest him. The suspect enter his home, with the police close losing. May the police enter the house without announcement? Why or why not?Answers: They do not due to the exigent circumstances exception to the warrant requirement. Because they are within pursuit, they may keep surrounded by pursuit. There is also a search pursuant to arrest.
They can enter the house because the suspect is fleeing the police. He refuse to stop when ordered to and evaded the police by running away.
They have every right to enter the house to arrest him.
yup but they cannot heave up the tiolet seat minus a warrant
More Questions and Answers:
[1277] - [2111] - [1556] - [754] - [2381] - [1335] - [1197] - [495] - [1516] - [602] - [2338] - [298] - [1558] - [1489] - [1045] - [2285] - [1686] - [1741] - [1392] - [1733]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: