Law Questions and Answers

Libel, Defamation or Slander?

My fiance's ex wife of over 10 years has a blog on myspace and she roughly trashed him and stated many untruths roughly him. She included personal information about his finances and what happen in court proceedings. She bash me also, calling me a gimp when I have have a stroke. Her profile is public and available for viewing for anyone who wishes to. Do any of the above apply?

Answers: yes, anything printed that is NOT true is slander and misrepresentation. unless, unsurprisingly its fiction.

How have you be damaged? If your atmosphere got hurt you haven't be damaged and so it will be hard to find someone to represent you. Also, if the information she is providing is public information OR information SHE believes to be true...i.e. also not slander. This is difficult to prove but since it is on her blog/website it should be fairly graceful to find it and provide copies to a lawyer but DAMAGES will be the issue and it doesn't nouns like you've be damaged by her website.

Death penalties???

im curious to know how they work and how long does it thieve before you die?

Answers: Here They Are By List. Make Sure To Check The Sources. See Number 5 For More Methods.

1. Electric Chair

The boss and legs of the condemned person are shaved and the prisoner is strapped into the bench. A moist sponge is placed on the head to aid conductivity. One electrode is attached to the boss and a second attached to the leg to provide a closed circuit. At least two jolts of an electrical current are applied near the time and current depending on the physical state of the condemned person. Typically an initial voltage of around 2,000 volts is applied for up to 15 second to attempt both to induce unconsciousness and to stop the heart. The voltage is consequently lowered to reduce current flow to approximately 8 amps. The body of the party may heat up to approximately 138 °F (59 °C), and the electric current will across the world cause severe incapacitate to internal organs.

In theory, loss of consciousness occurs surrounded by a fraction of a second. However, there are multiple reports of things going wrong during the process. There own been incidents of a person's guide on fire; of burning transformers, and of a bench breaking down after the initial jolt and letting the condemned skulk in strain on the floor of the execution room while the chair be fixed. In 1946, the electric chair spoilt to execute Willie Francis, who reportedly shrieked "Stop it! Let me breathe!" as he was person executed. It turned out that the portable electric chair have been inadequately set up by an intoxicated trustee. A case be brought before the U.S. Supreme Court (Francis v. Resweber),[6] near lawyers for the condemned arguing that although Francis did not die, he have, in certainty, been executed. The argument be rejected on the basis that re-execution did not violate the double jeopardy clause of the 5th Amendment of the US Constitution, and Francis be returned to the electric chair and successfully executed within 1947.

Regardless of how the execution is performed, cleaning up afterwards is described as unpleasant. Skin is inevitably burned and prison workers enjoy to separate the burnt skin from the electrodes. The initial flow of electric current may motivation the person to lose control over lots bodily functions, including muscle movement, urination and defecation. To mitigate this, alterations to modern electric chairs include padding and an inertia style retractable form belt.

2. Gas Chamber
A gas chamber is an apparatus for killing, consisting of a hermetically sealed chamber into which a poisonous or asphyxiant gas is introduced. The most commonly used poisonous agent is hydrogen cyanide; carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide have also be used.

When executions by gas chambers be conducted in the United States, the nonspecific protocol was as follows. First, the execution technician will place a sum of potassium cyanide (KCN) pellets into a compartment directly below the stool in the chamber. The condemned individual is then brought into the chamber and strapped into the bench, and the airtight chamber is sealed. At this point the execution technician will pour a sum of concentrated sulfuric acid (H2SO4) down a tube that lead to a small holding tank directly below the compartment containing the cyanide pellet. The curtain is then open, allowing the witnesses to observe the inside of the chamber. The prison steward will then ask the condemned individual if he or she wishes to gross a final statement. Following this, the executioner(s) will throw a switch/lever to cause the cyanide pellet to drop into the sulfuric acid, initiating a chemical counterattack that generates hydrogen cyanide (HCN) gas: c

2KCN (s) + H2SO4 (aq) → 2HCN (g) + K2SO4
The gas is perceptible to the condemned, and he/she is advised to pocket several deep breaths to speed blackout in directive to prevent unnecessary suffering. Most prisoners, however, try to hold their breath.[2] Death from hydrogen cyanide is usually painful and unpleasant, although abstractly the condemned individual should lose consciousness before dying. The chamber is afterwards purged of the gas through special scrubbers, and must be neutralized beside anhydrous ammonia (NH3) before it can be open. Guards wearing oxygen masks remove the body from the chamber. Finally, the prison doctor examines the individual surrounded by order to properly declare that he or she is deceased and release the body to the next of kin.

One of the problems near the gas chamber is the inherent danger of dealing near such a toxic gas. Anhydrous ammonia is used to cleanse the chamber after cyanide gas has be used:

HCN + NH3 → NH4+ + CN-.
The anhydrous ammonia used to clean the chamber afterwards, and the contaminated bitter that must be drained and disposed of, are both very poisonous.

Nitrogen gas or oxygen-depleted nouns has be considered for human execution, as it can induce Nitrogen asphyxiation. It has not be used to date.

3. Lethal Injection
Lethal injection involves injecting a person near fatal doses of poisonous drugs to create death. The principal applications are euthanasia, suicide and capital punishment (the final of which is the focus of this article). As a method for capital punishment, noxious injection gained popularity contained by the twentieth century as form of execution meant to supplant methods – such as electrocution, slack, firing squad, gas chamber, or decapitation – that were considered to be smaller number humane. The humaneness of lethal injection have been debate. (See "Controversy," below.) It is now the most adjectives form of execution in the United States: every American execution within 2005 was conducted by toxic injection. [1]

Lethal injection has also be used in euthanasia to facilitate voluntary extermination in patients next to terminal or chronically painful conditions. Both applications enjoy used similar drug combinations.

After the condemned is fastened on the execution table, two intravenous cannulae ("drips") are inserted, one in respectively arm. Only one is used for the execution; the other is reserved as a backup in grip the primary line fail. Another line is connected to the drip lines, to be precise attached to the lethal injection mechanism in an adjoining room and secured so the line doesn't snap during the injections.

The arm of the subject is swabbed beside alcohol before the cannula is inserted.[9] The needles and equipment used are also sterilized. One rationale for this is that cannulae are standard medical products that are sterilized during manufacture. Secondly, nearby is a chance that the prisoner could receive a stay of execution after the cannulae hold been inserted, as happen in the covering of James Autry in October 1983 (he be executed eventually on March 14, 1984). Finally, it would be a hazard to prison personnel to switch unsterilized equipment. The drips are then started, within both arms and a saline solution is sent flowing through them. This is so the chemicals don't mix and block up the needle making the drugs unqualified to reach the inmate and not work. A heart monitor is attached so that prison official can monitor when death have been obtain.

The intravenous injection is usually a sequence of compounds, designed to induce rapid blackout followed by death through paralysis of respiratory muscles and/or by inducing cardiac arrest through depolarization of cardiac muscle cell. The execution of the condemned in most states involves three separate injections:

Sodium thiopental: to render the guilty party unconscious.
Pancuronium/Tubocurarine: to stop adjectives muscle movement except the heart. This causes muscle paralysis, collapse of the diaphragm, and would eventually bring death by asphyxiation.
Potassium chloride: stops the heart, and thus cause death: see cardiac arrest.
The drugs are not mixed externally as that can basis them to precipitate.

The intravenous tubing leads to a room subsequent to the execution chamber, usually separated from the subject by a curtain or wall. Typically a technician trained in venipuncture inserts the plunger, while a second technician, who is usually a member of the prison staff, information, prepares, and loads the drugs into the lethal injection appliance. Two other staff members start the domestic device up and prepare for the signal to start. After the curtain is opened to allow the witnesses to see inside the chamber, the condemned personality will then be permitted to brand a final statement. Following this, the warden will signal for the execution to verbs, and the executioner(s) (either prison staff or private citizens depending on the jurisdiction) will then get going the lethal injection device which mechanically deliver the three drugs in sequence. During the execution, the subject's cardiac rhythm is monitored. Death is pronounced after cardiac movement stops. Death usually occurs inwardly seven minutes, although the whole procedure can clutch up to 2 hours, as was the skin with the execution of Christopher Newton on May 24, 2007. According to state directive, if participation contained by the execution is prohibited for physicians, the death ruling is made by the state's Medical Examiner's Office. After confirmation that annihilation has occur, a coroner signs the executed individual’s death authorization.

4. Firing Squad
Execution by firing squad is a method of capital punishment, remarkably common within times of war. The firing squad is mostly composed of several soldiers or peace officers. The method of execution requires adjectives members of the group to fire simultaneously, thus preventing both disruption of the process by a single bough and identification of the associate who fired the lethal shot. The condemned is typically blindfolded or hooded, as okay as restrained. Executions can be carried out with the condemned any standing or sitting.

In some cases, one member of the firing squad is issued a weapon containing a blank tape instead of one with a bullet, minus telling any of them to whom it have been given. This is believed to cut back flinching by individual members of the firing squad, making the execution process more reliable. It also allows respectively member of the firing squad a unsystematic to believe afterward that he did not personally fire a vicious shot. This reinforces the sense of diffusion of responsibility. While an experienced marksman can tell the difference between a blank and a live videotape based on the wince (the blank will have much lower recoil), at hand is a significant psychological incentive not to pay attention and, over time, to remember the flinch as soft.

According to Executions in the U.S. 1608-1987 by M. Watt Espy and John Ortiz Smylka, it is estimated that 142 men enjoy been judicially shot within the United States and English-speaking predecessor territories since 1608, excluding executions related to the American Civil War. The Civil War saw several hundred firing squad death, but reliable numbers are not available. Crimes punishable by firing squad in the Civil War included desertion, intentionally massacre a superior officer or fellow soldier, and being a spy.

Capital punishment be suspended in the United States between 1967 and 1976 as a result of several decision of the United States Supreme Court. The process resumed with the execution of Gary Gilmore on January 17, 1977, at Utah State Prison within Draper. The five executioners were equipped next to .30-30 caliber rifles and off-the-shelf Winchester 150 grain (9.7 g) SilverTip ammunition. The subject be restrained and hooded. The shots were fired at a distance of 20 foot (6 m), aiming at the chest. In his autobiography Shot in the Heart, Mikal Gilmore wrote that when he examined the shirt worn by his brother Gary during the execution, he found five bullet holes, indicating that adjectives members of the squad have been armed near live cartridges and none with a blank round.

The merely other post-Furman execution by firing squad, that of John Albert Taylor in 1996, also took place surrounded by Utah. Taylor is said to have chosen the firing squad because it would be awkward for state official.

In Utah, the firing squad consisted of five volunteer police officers from the county within which the conviction of the offender took place. A tenet passed on March 15, 2004 banned execution by firing squad within Utah, but since that specific law be not retroactive, four inmates on Utah's death row could still own their last requests granted. As of 2006, Idaho and Oklahoma are the simply other states in which execution by firing squad is lawfully available (as backup methods only; both states use noxious injection as their primary methods of execution).

This is how it works in Indiana.

In Indiana, the destruction penalty is available lone for the crime of murder, and is
available for murder only if the prosecution can prove the existence of at lowest possible one of 16
“aggravating circumstances” identified by the Indiana General Assembly. These
circumstances are set out in the state’s disappearance penalty statute, at IC 35-50-2-9. In decree
to seek the departure penalty, the prosecutor must allege the existence of at smallest one of
the aggravating circumstances set out in the statute.

If the grip proceeds to trial, and the defendant is convicted of murder, the trial
proceeds to a second phase to determine the appropriate penalty. The jury hear
evidence regarding the existence of the alleged aggravating circumstance(s) and any
mitigating circumstances – facts which would organize them to recommend a lesser
sentence. They are required to return a special prison term form indicating whether they
unanimously find the existence of each charged statutory aggravating circumstance
beyond a likely doubt. They are not allowed to recommend that the defendant be
sentenced to departure or life in need parole unless they unanimously find that the state has
proved the existence of at most minuscule one alleged aggravating circumstance beyond a
reasonable doubt, and also find that the aggravating circumstance(s) outweigh the
mitigating circumstances. If the jury unanimously agrees on their sentencing
“recommendation,” the trial court must follow it. If they cannot agree on the sentence,
but unanimously agree that an aggravating circumstance exists, the Court is free to
sentence the defendant to any a term of years, energy without parole, or disappearance.

If a death sentence is imposed, it may be subjected to three level of appellate
review: Direct appeal in the Indiana Supreme Court, focusing on legalized issues; state
post-conviction review, which can also look at factual issues such as whether trial
counsel competently represented the defendant, whether evidence be suppressed,
and whether any witnesses have recant their testimony; and federal habeas corpus
review, which focuses on federal constitutional issues. A prisoner may also request
clemency from the Governor. The first smooth of review – direct appeal – is mandatory,
but the prisoner may choose to forego the others.

If a prisoner is executed, the State of Indiana will strap him or her to a gurney,
insert an IV line, and inject into that flash a series of three chemicals: (1) sodium
thiopental, an ultra-short-acting barbiturate, to render him or her unconscious; (2)
pancuronium bromide, to paralyze voluntary and reflex muscles; and (3) potassium
chloride, to stop his or her heart. Defense attorneys and others own raised concerns
that the dosage of sodium thiopental may be unsatisfactory or may wear off too with alacrity,
and that the pancuronium bromide, which renders the prisoner unable to move or
speak, may covering signs of consciousness and excruciating pain. The U.S. Supreme
Court will hear argument this residence on whether this protocol is cruel and unusual.

There are several methods that are "preffered", to use the term insubstantially, by the various government. Probably the oldest is hanging or beheading.

For Hanging, vertical hotel is erected around ten feet above ground stratum, 15 if it is a formal gallows. A rope is then formed out of a length of rope. For an impromptu floppy, the rope is fitted around the neck and they are afterwards hoisted into the air and they suffocate. For a formal floppy, there leg supported is within some way removed so that theydrop and dangle. This is acheived several ways; any through a trap door, kicking a stool out form under them, kicking a horse that they are sitting on, or removing the support altogether, ex. a plank over a drop rotten with counterbalance on one end and the subject on the other beside noose affixed. The solidity is then removed, and the subject falls. The hope is generally to break the collar, if that does not work, they choke to death.

Beheading is striking a blow at the nouns with a sharp, lashing object, whether it be a sword or a guillotine.

Firing squad- one man, restrained, sometimes blindfolded, face a group of around ten men. Depending upon the setting, the firing squad may not have adjectives live cartridges. This is for the mental state of the executioners afterwards. Informal or expedient firing squad, i.e. one bullet in the spinal column of the head, favorite practice surrounded by china is to bill the bullet to the family afterward.

Gas chamber- the subject is placed surrounded by the chair within the middle of the chamber and then potassium cyanide pellet are dropped into sulfuric acid directly below the stool. The resulting cyanide gases raison d`être death.

Electric Chair, An intense amount of electricity is applied to the body contained by five minute intervals until the subject is pronounced dead.

Lethal injection- a mixture of drugs are inserted intravenously into the body. The drugs are a mixture of pain-killers, muscle relaxers, and heart stoppers. The controversy is that if the painkillers don't work, the subject endure immense pain up to that time expiring.

On time till death
Hanging- instantaneous to 5 minutes
Beheading- instantaneous, unless it is a poor commission
Firing squad- instantaneous to as much as an hour, sometimes if the subject survives, a second round is fired
Gas chamber- 5 to 10 minutes depending on breathing and gas concentration
Electric chair- 5-30 minutes many variables reason for this
Lethal injection- some controversy but anywhere from 5 to 20 minutes

I believe you must mean from sentencing to carrying out the sentence. If so. Way, bearing too long

Is it legal for a gay guy yo marry a lesbian, or is that fraud?

Answers: Are you suggesting that family who do not actually love respectively other never get married? You enjoy a lot to revise.

Of course it is legal. You own one man and one woman.

Statue of limitions on fileing an appeal of a misdomeanor in Ohio?

How long after a court covering in the state of Ohio can you folder for an appeal?

Answers: All states except Louisiana are based on English Common Law. LA is base on Napoleonic Code. If the case be closed as a result of a plea-bargain, there is no appeal because that right be surrendered as a part of the plea wrangle. If there be an error in procedure by the court or bright evidence has be discovered, there is no time constrain for your right to appeal.

Seems like it be either ten days or 30, but I am not sure. If you look up the Ohio Rules of Appellate procedure contained by your county law library you can capture an real answer, or you can only just get arbitrary guesses at this site.

Website abuse report?

I be found a website called www.fixya.com which they said you can earn extra money by answer some posted problem. The fixya be stated that they are going to send money more or less every end of the month as your returns in the previous month. I get almost $100.00 but I found out that almost three months I was not competent to receive some sort of money from them, they were basically keep you promise and making some justification that will change your mine to hang around.

I am wasted my time and physical exertion on that website. I am pretty sure that a lot of society will consider as a victim if this website will verbs to published their fradulent and spam activity.

Right immediately, my user account on that site be already remove by them because I was posted some info which is impossible to their side. If you want to experience on that thing you can do it, a short time ago to prove that all my sayings is true. I only want to ask where can use to report a spot on website to have a legitimate action about this matter.

Thank you

Answers: Yes, it is a money scam. I bet you have to pay to sign up to? Or you own to pay to achieve the money you have already earn. I dont even need to look at their site to read out they are a scam.

You may be able to use whois.com to see who their webhosting is beside. You can file a report next to their webhosting stating that they are violating the hostings vocabulary of service.

They will look at the site. If it is indeed violating vocabulary of service, they will shut it down.

You should also contact the bbb, ftc maybe. There may be a federal place to lodge complaints, but I am not sure.

More than predictable they are following the law to the communiqu��, so other than language of service violations, at hand may not be any reason to shut them down.

The site may also be run out of country, significance they are not subject to the US laws. Meaning, not a soul can do anything except maybe the country the site is originate from.

The best defense for these kinds of things is tuition in how to spot these scam.

(BTW, most of the 'get paid to read your emial or ads' sites are scam as well. The ones that arent scam only salary out about 1 penny per 100 (just a number I pulled) items you vista. Hardly worth the time)

If you want to make money online, I suggest you look for a tangible tax paying profession. THat right there is a first clue on if it is legit. DO you hold to provide tax info? If it is a legit track of making money, a legit 'job', you will have to bestow tax info and payment taxes on the income, be it w2 or 1099.

Check with www.ftc.gov. If they don't enjoy something there, they'll supply you a link to complain to another parliament website. There are a ton of fraudulent websites out there. If you really want to earn money at home, try going to www.komando.com . She have links. You just own to do a little probing to find them.
Hope this helps.

Does the Second Amendment suggest that a person should be part of the pack of a the "militia" in writ to own a firearm?

The Second Amendment:
A well regulated Militia, person necessary to the guarantee of a free State, the right of the people to keep hold of and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

And where on earth does the Second Amendment grant unfettered access to firearms?

Answers: My feeble professor years and years and years ago explained it this way. The race were given the right to undergo arms for 2 reasons:
1) for an armed militia prepared to protect themselves against the British
2) for the ethnic group to protect themselves FROM the militia who tried to seize private property lower than false pretense of "protecting from British when no threat existed"

Not as eloquent as the other answers, but it made sense to me afterwards.

Founding fathers know people would involve protection from within as in good health as from without?

This vein explains it all...I've capitilized the knob word:

"...the right of the PEOPLE to keep and accept arms, shall not be infringed."

It suggests that the reason for a creature owning one is philosophically tied to that of a militia.

A lot of American laws own to do with coping next to British oppression. It's in recent times history. Firearms in the hand of civilians worked well during the scuffle for independance, but a lot of those only owned pitchforks and shovels as missiles. That's why American law, today, is friendly to the firearm (except within Maryland).

Historically speaking there be two basic school of thought regarding national defense.

1- Standing Army beside lots of gun control; favored by much of Europe but feared surrounded by the Colonies as it put military power in the hand of the monarch.

2- No/little standing army, civilian militias defend nation, no gun control; favored by the colonies as it kept power near the people.

The Constitution be formed in this framework as the founding father fear a strong federal government.

The Civil War established that the US would be a single nation (not only a union of sovereign states, resembling th EU today) We can only guess at what the founding father would have done if they saw the nation today

Still, I one-sidedly err on the side of Freedom and gun ownership. But we've never had unlimited rights to firepower ownership. We can't own tanks, house mines, nuclear weapons, etc.

There's two issues.

First is that the militia, historically, be everyone. (Or, at least, everyone that matter in the eyes of the founding father - free white adult males)

So the logic aft the "militia" line surrounded by the 2nd is that if the militia had to be mustered, every citizen would come to the muster, bringing his own firearm.

Second is that if you read the writings of the founding father, you'll see that they had impressively little faith within the ability of a administration - even the one that they were establishing - to resist the slide into tyranny, and they feel that an armed citizenry was the best check on that.

They have two object curriculum in mind when they did so. First as you would expect, was the system of England. (The founders were, after adjectives, virtually all Englishmen.) For centuries the rights and freedoms of Englishmen have been protected by the checks and balance inherant in a Constitutional Monarchy.

The Crown ruled, but couldn't import tax. Parliament could tax, and legislate, but couldn't interfere near the power of the Crown to rule. Neither Crown NOR Parliament could rule, or legislate, in a route that violated the people's rights under adjectives law, as defined and enforced by an independant judiciary.

The system worked, and very well, for centuries. BUT. in the colonies it get skewed by a ruler who said that the ancient protections didn't apply outside England itself. (Can anyone say "Guantanamo Bay?)

The second lesson be the rash of little rebellion in Europe. In country after country an total Monarch, ruling without the checks and balance of the English system, was thrown down by the those - who then established a tyranny far worse than the monarch they have removed.

The founders were determined to avoid this. They set up a system base on what they saw as the best of the system they'd grown up in, next to the worst removed, and with reliable guarantees - the Bill of Rights - to ensure that it stayed a government of, by and for, free men.

They be, however, also realists - and the 2nd was to ensure that if adjectives their hopes failed, an armed citizenry could again rise up and throw bad a despotic government.

Richard

No.
The possibility of raise a Militia at need be
the concern.
If you read the debate current at the time, the
Second Amendement was designed to guarantee
the possiblity of popular resistance to the actions
of the current Government, - a check on it's power.
We may need that more today than any time since
the labor unrest within the 1880's.

Rightly read, the Second Amendment grants the
citizen the right to arm himself to the standard of
desk light infantry.
Today that would mean a select fire assault rifle,
grenade launcher, and some forms of night light anti-air,
and anti-armor capability.
- I don't see that stirring, do you?
The 'Right` is already substantially infringed, and
they are trying to kill it altogether.
I wonder what they're planning..

Why is suicide illegal?

why is it unsanctioned when you harming nobody and its you
roughly suicide you are not harming anybody unless you are using a bomb

but if its freshly you why is it illegal

murder is when you take out someone
suicide is killing you

why is it against the law

Answers: Share some old jape with you..
Q: What is the punishment for suicide?
A: Life captivity...
Q: What is the punishment for attempted suicide?
A: Hanging...

so the point is, how can suicide be illegal, given that the perp cannot be punished? This is not going on for the law, the view vary from time to time and it depends on the culture of one society. We lone see it that way presently thanks to evolving concept of morality.

i don't think i is against the law, but i think within one sttate it's illegal to commit suicide surrounded by a bathtub..no really..

but u are still harm people emotionally.

If you attempt suicide you are trying to whip a life. That is against the directive. If your attempt is not successful you can be arrested for attempted murder. More than likely you would take counseling.

Im on probation and i have to be within by ten or tell them/ask if im going to be at someone else's house.?

how can i do that at the moment if i haven't be assigned one at the moment but i am pretty sure the probation has started.

Answers: Be contained by your own house by 10:00pm... Have your friend(s) come stay with you... The decide ordered the curfew for a reason, and unless you're getting medical assistance or working second or third shift, at hand is no productive reason for you to be out olden 10:00pm... You can discuss it with your PO when you gather round him/her for the first time, but if I'm your PO, and I can't find you at home after 10:00pm, you're going to need to show me hospital paperwork or a timecard from your available job, or risk going to jail...

And your probation started the moment the adjudicate sentenced you...

I can't put it better than the other answerers. STAY HOME AFTER 10 until you have a PO assigned, and can ask him.

Otherwise, the PO who happen to draw night duty is going to turn down the list of curfew probationers making the phone call, get to you, you're out, and he violate you and you go straight to lock up.

Richard

What if i had go-ahead to kill someone?

for example

let say steve give me permission to destroy him and i had evidence that he give me permission
will charges still be pressed
if so why

Answers: Yes, charges would be file because even suicide is against the law.

Yes, it is still against the imperative.
look up Dr. Jack Kevorkian.
j

Consent is a defense to most crimes, but not to murder. Instead, consent is mitigating. It can be considered at sentencing. The real effect of have consent is to prove premeditation and deliberation.

Did you know in UK adjectives people's votes are kept by parliament? There is no right to anonimity just privacy?

It is a startling certainty.
The local government sends the forms beside the registers of electors and their insinuation number which is on their voting slip to the electorial commission. All people's votes are collected by the commission who resides in parliament.
These have been sorted on see night within the order of political party are then sent to a warehouse presently guarded by securicor.
There is no anonimity. You can contact your local MP and check this out.
Anyone voted for Communists or BNP? Then our 'security services' will specifically have a directory on you!
Neat hey?
Why do you think the 3 chief parties hold adjectives the power?

Answers: Votes must be confidential so that people will be protected and not subject to discrimination by the politicians whom they did not vote.

More Questions and Answers:
[430] - [1482] - [1053] - [1486] - [1514] - [2371] - [1205] - [1859] - [2343] - [150] - [143] - [558] - [918] - [892] - [596] - [319] - [1619] - [854] - [1791] - [296]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: