Law Questions and Answers

Getting my money back, is this possible?

I bought a jacket for my brother. It be too small, so I went put money on to exchange it. There were no more contained by stock, but the employee told me that a clean shipment would be coming in every week. He later took down my name, phone number, and description of the item that I needed.

Here's the problem. I be mad in the order of there not mortal any more items in stock, so I wasn't thinking clearly. I give back the jacket, but kept the receiving thinking I'd just bring that within. Today, I called the store, and I draw from the feeling that the administrator might not want to give me my money subsidise, since I only enjoy the receipt, but no jacket to bring within with it.

My examine, do I have a luggage for getting my money back? Even if I be mistaken in not keeping the jacket, the member of staff never should have official it back. He should hold told me to keep it. I be acting in flawless faith, trusting that my tally would be sufficient when the current stock came surrounded by and that employee never suggested otherwise.
Answers: If you remember the hand you gave it to, return to the store when he's on duty and finish the concordat with him, or at least possible be ready to communicate the manager who it be (what he looked like, what time of year it was so they can check the duty roster) and be nice going on for it so they've no excuse to deny your request.
I guess it all depends on what that member of staff says. If remembers and tell the manager that he took the jacket next you're good.

If he doesn't or claims he doesn't, consequently I don't think near is anything you can do. sorry.
You might have a fate if the employee you give the jacket to is honest. Most people are honest.

Total hypothetical for you kids, just want to see where on earth everyone's thinking is at?

You are a bartender, a patron comes contained by and shows the doorman an ID that states the person is 21. The hours of darkness goes on, they really don't find drunk, so you think the soul is cute, one thing lead to another and bam, you're having sex out contained by the parking lot after closing time. The next daytime you are arrested for having sex beside a minor, are you going to be convicted or not?
Answers: No conviction, the kid falsified his identity.
Maybe but that depends on the jury and the state it happes in. Age of consent vary from state to state. If they are that far under the age, you should look for a different opportunity. Obviously you don't have the ablity to estimate ages.

The pub will be fined for serving a minor alcohol.
To many issues to query before guilt would be placed.

Door man wishes to be question

ID wants to be checked.

Person in ask needs to be question.

Bartender needs to be cross-examine.

There is just to much information to be checked on this isssue.

Does the statute in that state require you to check ID in the past you serve. I would look to this being a push button factor in this issue. In Texas, a bartender is required to hope out ID before they serve the anybody.
I construe that a minor who lies about their age to gain benefits should not be allowed to coward out & cry anything.
I judge a federal law should be bygone prohibiting anyone from age 13 to lie/misrepresent their age.

Unfortunately too many ppl see these 'kids' as 'victums' and not the stupid trouble maker they are.
Statutory rape is almost like strict liability. You should own taken all the steps to form sure the girl is not underage. When in doubt, don't enjoy sex. If you do, it doesn't matter if the ID be fake, or whether you remember the ID or not. You should own known better. You will promising be convicted. Remember, in a criminal luggage it is the State v. You, not the Underage Victim v. You. So the state interest is to punish your conduct on behalf of the society. When the duty is put on your as an adult to fashion sure you don't have sex next to a minor, what deceptive conduct on the subject of the fake ID that she may enjoy done is not as important. You can try that as a defense, but probably won't abet you out a lot.

Emansipation and marrige laws contained by Virginia?

i need to know something like the laws in the region of marrige and emansipation in Va. I know that if your 16 you can achieve married but both people enjoy to be at least 16 and i know that you hold to be 16 to get emancipated but what if your marry is over 18??? Would you be able to marry them and move within with them?
Answers: No sermonize. Here are the links. Good luck.
http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=emancip...
i REALLY hate to nouns mean, but if you can't spell what you want to do, you probably shouldn't do it.

finish academy before you wish to get married.

and contained by regards to the creature being over 18: why don't you of late wait until YOU'RE court? that way you don't enjoy to go through so much paperwork and whatnot.
In lay down to get married while lower than 18 in Virginia, you must own your parents' consent. (See the 1st link.) If you slump about your age surrounded by order to marry, your parents can ask a court to set aside the matrimonial.

FYI, in Virginia it is a crime for someone 18 or elder to have sex near someone under 18. It's a class one misdemeanor, punishable near up to one year in put inside and a $2,500.00 fine.(See the 2nd link.)
Unfortunately, intelligence doesn't own anything to do with it. (Because we adjectives know a 16 year old CHILD hasn't get it.)
Virginia does not allow for the emancipation of minors unless the minors surrounded by question are literate. (That mode they can spell, and they can write reasonably coherently...complete sentences, proper language rules, etc...)

By the way, at age 16, and next to no education, what big-hearted of life do you contemplate you'll have? it won't be going out to dinner once a week surrounded by your late-model Toyota Camry and then home to your 3 bedroom two-and-a-half-bath home to examine cable TV. It'll be more like sharing a bowl of Ramen noodles next to your unemployed child-age husband and your three welfare waifs, while the two of root beneath the sofa cushions for plenty lose change to buy a pack of generic cigarettes while you lolly in some food stamps at the local 7/Eleven on a Slurpee to mix beside your Ripple while you await next month's welfare check.
Do yourself and your adjectives children a favor: WAIT until you've at least gotten a college nurture.
Fora minor to marry he/she require parental consent. If the minor does not have that consent no nuptials can take place. In most states once a minor is married he/she become emancipated by marriage however contained by VA I believe you must request this through courts. This should be a simple matter if your married.

Why are drugs and other substances prohibited for personal use ?

Yo! Im from the EU and was only asking myself this question and couldnt find an answer. I dont use any drugs exept as you would expect I drink some alcohol (beer and shots), and I was wondering : why within our free society that has no religion forced upon general public ,is enlightened and modern, are there law prohibiting a citizen from using drugs ? I understand that man a dealer must be improper as is ANY black trade. But why arent substances sold legally surrounded by pharmacy and supermarkets for everyone to use ? There would be laws as expected prohibiting someone to force someone else to consume and such. I mean, surrounded by our country of freedom, why cant a good citizen consume what he requests WITHOUT bothering anybody on HIS PROPERTY ? I know it is less extreme surrounded by Europe than in America, where on earth laws are even more extreme roughly speaking this.
Understand that Im not opposed to "logical" law such as laws prohibiting underage drinking and such.(they are logical)
Please no stupid answer,
lately a philosophical question
-Nicolas
Answers: The Government take the position that the
people are too foolish to be allowed to trade name
decisions surrounded by these and similar matters.
Sadly, this have generally proven true.
Since our society is so closely interwoven, smash up
to yourself often involves reduce to rubble to others,
(drunk driving eg.).
With 'harmless` drugs such as antibiotics, there
is also a proven 'public interest` issue surrounded by that overuse
of the drugs breeds resistant bacteria that are in a minute a
serious threat to all.
I agree beside you, that in a ideal world, populated by
rational individuals, the freedom you suggest would
be the ideal.
But of late look around you.
Look at some of the dumb questions on this board.
How much trust do you place surrounded by the general population?
There is no agency to tax it so they only just keep it wrong.

You cant use Mushrooms in the US which puts ancestors in a better mood.

Yet you can lug Prozac which puts you in a better mood...

Most of examples below me show the social troubles of Illegal drug use and they are correct however if you made it legal next many of the social troubles would go away.

Gangs don't put up for sale drugs when you can buy them at Walmart.

People get relief for problem that are not looked at as shameful or illegal.

Alcohol and Cigs are stabilizer and are more harmful afterwards organic drugs. Yet they are tax and regulated and big corps make a huge profit on them so they are tolerates.

The largest problem is that if you would legalize drugs for a social group it would be a free for all. Major problems...

Also who become rich off of it. Say you make conform pot. The person that have the most pot shops in the 1st year have more money then Bill Gates. Who grows it, the cultivator or the government? What will we do next to all the uniform prisons that are full of pot heads?

It is such a mess. So we will verbs our failed period of war on drugs go on.
Nick, operating stale your logic, lets cart it a step further to arrive at this conclusion.
The government's responsibility is to regulate the society to insure its safety and streamlined operation. Does the government do this? not other. But the voting public holds them accountable adjectives the same and elect those they feel will. Drugs, however friendly, end in ill-effects within a society. Not in recent times crime, as most of the crime can be excused as part and parcel to them individual illegal. The problem comes from regulation. We cannot regulate a drug that can confidently be made in someone's underground room or grown in their attic. Moreover, if Drug A is lawful, and John Q. Public grows drug A in his subterranean vault, but makes some change to it...there is no process the average consumer would be able to distiguish between the two. So the robustness risks only become increasingly magnified. Moreover, near is a direct link to worker inefficiency and risks to drug use. These adjectives add to the bottom smudge cost to a government. masses governments reluctantly allowed for alcohol, and made accomadations that made it heavily regulated. It still hasn't solved the disappearance and dismemberment issues with this, so they are presently ill-equipped to switch an increase in their workload.
i would imagine it's because a lot of those things organize to other things. like drugs organize to gangs which head to violence. plus when someone is on drugs, they don't necessarily enjoy the mental capacities to know to stay surrounded by their home and keep to themselves. i hold a feeling that if everyone be free to do whatever they want whenever they needed, we'd have a world of crazies running around outside.

not to mention the strength effects it has on your body. there's no denying that drugs put to death people, so lawmakes, within all pious conscience, can't really make close by products that they know would kill.

things resembling that.
The problem with heaps drugs is their addictive nature. People lift the drugs and then their body processes are changed, becoming smaller quantity efficient lacking the drug. They become physically uncomfortable and sick (withdrawal), until they carry the drug again (addiction).
People addicted to drugs become manipulative, self centered, and verbally insolent. They care just for themselves and feeding their addiction. They lie, cheat, and steal next to no concern for who is harmed. They soon ignore hygiene, responsibilities, job, etc.
As addiction progresses, they become a financial burden to their societies...first as lost workers, then as culture with no money who must be feed, housed, and given medical care. Most steal to get hold of money to buy the drugs.
I have met former millionaires who've lost everything this passageway to cocaine, now living on the smaller number than generous public dole surrounded by the US and using up tax money to win medical care...including drugs. I've met a superb singer who have to give up medical conservatory and her baby because of cocaine. I've specified nurses who've lost their licenses, family, and self respect due to stealing painkillers from their patients.

Estate question?

my girlfriends father lately passed away and he left no will. He have remarried about 7 years ago and never put his hot wifes name on the title of their house. She have one other sister and its believed her father put their names on it when he be divorced to get his ex-wife to sign past its sell-by date on the house. She wants to know who have the right to the house her and her sister or her step mother.
Answers: I don't know specifically about the state you are contained by, but I will try to answer in common. In most states if a person dies next to out a will their property and assets will be probated and distributed according to the laws of the state the creature resided in at the time of disappearance. Like I said each state is different, but surrounded by general, 50 % would shift to the spouse, then the remaining 50% will be divided amongst his children within equal shares. If your girlfriend believes that their names be added at some point then you obligation to go to your county court house and look up the Deed or Title to Real Estate (same item, but some states call them 1 or the other). In SC, my state, the organization is called the Register of Deeds Office and to be precise where respectively County keeps up near property records. They can backing you find it and make you a copy of it. If the property is within their names as capably, you will still need to hire a probate attorney to sustain you probate it, but at least they know that at lowest a portion of it is theirs, otherwise the wife may be able to stay near and they could have to linger until she dies to claim their part of it. I am a paralegal, but save in mind that you still obligation to speak with an attorney to find out specifics in the order of your state and you case. This is not legitimate advice it is simply general information. Hope this help.
Whoever the probate court decides when his estate is probated... respectively state has different ways of dividing up the assets if here is no will in place.

Tell her not to spend the money, it typically takes over a year to attain it finalized. She can get the orb rolling by filing the motion surrounded by probate court to get his estate settled.
She should check with the county tariff assessor, or the county property records bureau to see who's name the property is contained by. If he did put it in her heading and her sister she is probably entitled to evict the stepmother. If the property is not in his identify, it will not be subject to intestate statues, because only property owned at the time of loss is subject to the statutory scheme for heirship.

Summary:
1. check to see how the property is titled
2. if in attendance is a mortgage, be prepared to pay it bad
3. check with an attorney
His property will be divided among his wife and
blood relatives acording to the probate law of
his State.
If he did put others names on the Title to the house,
they may enjoy property rights in the house outside
those of the Estate.
Find the Deed or investigate the Title.

Suing over emotional trauma?

Someone said they would do that to me. They said I'm the rationale they went to a mental hospital and enjoy to go to analysis now. Can they sue over something similar to that?
Answers: You can sue someone for anything. If you can convince a judge to hear the suitcase. Emotional injury is a joke. Matter of reality, most suits are jokes.
If you live the great state of California, I might be worried. *sarcasm*

I guess it depends on what you "did" to this personage. A decent intercede will know a frivolous case when he see one.

Dear America?

To the citizens of the United States of America, in the pale of your failure to elect a competent President of the USA and thus to govern yourselves, we hereby contribute notice of the revocation of your nouns, effective today.

Her Sovereign Majesty Queen Elizabeth II will resume monarchical duties over adjectives states, commonwealths and other territories. Except Utah, which she does not fancy. Your modern prime minister (The Right Honourable Tony Blair, MP for the 97.85% of you who have until in a minute been uninformed that there is a world outside your borders) will appoint a minister for America lacking the need for further elections. Congress and the Senate will be disbanded. A questionnaire will be circulated subsequent year to determine whether any of you noticed. To aid within the transition to a British Crown Dependency, the following rules are introduced with direct effect:

1. You should look up revocation in the Oxford English Dictionary. Then look up aluminium. Check the pronunciation guide. You will be amazed at in recent times how wrongly you have be pronouncing it. The letter 'U' will be reinstated within words such as 'favour' and 'neighbour', skipping the letter 'U' is nil more than laziness on your sector. Likewise, you will learn to spell 'doughnut' short skipping half the junk mail. You will end your love affair near the letter 'Z' (pronounced 'zed' not 'zee') and the suffix ize will be replaced by the suffix ise. You will cram that the suffix 'burgh' is pronounced 'burra' e.g. Edinburgh. You are welcome to respell Pittsburgh as 'Pittsberg' if you can't cope beside correct pronunciation.

Generally, you should raise your vocabulary to reasonable levels. Look up vocabulary. Using one and the same twenty seven words interspersed with filler noise such as "like" and "you know" is an unacceptable and inefficient form of communication. Look up interspersed. There will be no more 'bleeps' within the Jerry Springer show. If you're not old satisfactory to cope with fruitless language afterwards you shouldn't have chat shows. When you swot to develop your vocabulary then you won't own to use bad spoken language as often.

2. There is no such article as "US English". We will let Microsoft know on your behalf. The Microsoft spell-checker will be familiar to take commentary of the reinstated letter 'u' and the expulsion of -ize.

3. You should learn to distinguish the English and Australian accent. It really isn't that hard. English accent are not limited to cockney,upper-class twit or Mancunian (Daphne contained by Frasier). You will also have to revise how to understand regional accent - Scottish dramas such as Taggart will no longer be broadcast with subtitles. While we're conversation about regions, you must cram that there is no such place as Devonshire contained by England. The name of the county is Devon. If you continue in calling it Devonshire, adjectives American States will become shires e.g. Texasshire, Floridashire, Louisianashire.

4. Hollywood will be required occasionally to cast English actor as the good guys. Hollywood will be required to kind English actors to play English characters. British sit-coms such as Men Behaving Badly or Red Dwarf will not be re-cast and watered down for a wishy-washy American audience who can't cope beside the humour of occasional political incorrectness.

5. You should relearn your original national anthem, God Save The Queen but one and only after fully carrying out task 1. We would not want you to draw from confused and give up partly way through.

6. You should stop playing American football. There is singular one kind of football. What you refer to as American football is not a totally good team game. The 2.15% of you who are aware that there is a world outside your borders may hold noticed that not a soul else plays American football. You will no longer be allowed to play it, and should instead play proper football. Initially, it would be best if you played with the girls. It is a difficult hobby. Those of you brave enough will, surrounded by time, be allowed to play rugby (which is similar to American "football", but does not involve stopping for a rest every twenty seconds or wearing full kevlar body armour resembling nancies). We are hoping to get together at lowest a US Rugby sevens side by 2005. You should stop playing baseball. It is not reasonable to host an event call the 'World Series' for a game which is not played outside of America. Since merely 2.15% of you are aware that there is a world beyond your borders,your error is pardonable. Instead of baseball, you will be allowed to play a girls' game call rounders, which is baseball without fancy troop strip, oversized gloves, collector cards or hotdogs.

7. You will no longer be allowed to own or carry guns. You will no longer be allowed to own or take anything more dangerous contained by public than a vegetable peeler. Because we don't believe you are sensible enough to button potentially dangerous items, you will require a travel document if you wish to convey a vegetable peeler in public.

8. July 4th is no longer a public holiday. November 2nd will be a investigational national holiday, but only surrounded by England. It will be called Indecisive Day.

9. All American cars are hereby prohibited. They are crap and it is for your own good. When we show you German cars, you will have a handle on what we mean. All road intersections will be replaced next to roundabouts. You will start driving on the left beside immediate effect. At like peas in a pod time,you will go metric near immediate effect and conversion table. Roundabouts and metrication will help you appreciate the British sense of humour.

10. You will learn to engender real chips. Those things you give the name French fries are not real chips. Fries aren't even French, they are Belgian though 97.85% of you (including the guy who discovered fries while surrounded by Europe) are not aware of a country called Belgium. Those things you insist on calling potato chips are properly call crisps. Real chips are thick cut and fried within animal fat. The traditional accompaniment to chips is beer which should be served heat and flat. Waitresses will be trained to be more aggressive with customers.

11. As a sign of penance 5 grams of ocean salt per cup will be added to adjectives tea made within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, this degree to be doubled for tea made within the city of Boston itself.

12. The cold vulgar stuff you insist on calling beer is not actually beer at adjectives, it is lager. From November 1st only proper British Bitter will be referred to as beer,and European brews of certain and accepted provenance will be referred to as Lager. The substances formerly certain as American Beer will henceforth be referred to as Near-Frozen Knat's Urine,with the exception of the product of the American Budweiser company whose product will be referred to as Weak Near-Frozen Knat's Urine. This will allow true Budweiser (as manufactured for the closing 1000 years in Pilsen,Czech Republic) to be sold in need risk of confusion.

13. From November 10th the UK will harmonise petrol (or Gasoline, as you will be permitted to keep calling it until April 1st 2005) prices beside the former USA. The UK will harmonise its prices to those of the former USA and the Former USA will, in return, adopt UK petrol prices (roughly $6/US gallon- go and get used to it).

14. You will learn to resolve personal issues in need using guns, lawyers or therapist. The fact that you entail so many lawyer and therapists shows that you're not full-grown enough to be independent. Guns should with the sole purpose be handled by adults. If you're not fully fledged enough to sort things out lacking suing someone or speaking to a therapist after you're not grown up enough to touch a gun.

15. Please tell us who kill JFK. It's been driving us crazy.

16. Tax collectors from Her Majesty's Government will be beside you shortly to ensure the acquisition of adjectives revenues due (backdated to 1776).

Thank you for your co-operation and have a great afternoon.

John Cleese
Answers: As a Brit I have see this too many times immediately and it usually has like peas in a pod effect on Americans, It is a joke which they can not see the funny side of, afterwards again their humour is not very advanced which is why they other love our special brand of comedy and then try to do a disastrous re-make of it which usually go **** up very like a shot, you see Americans lack or simply do not hold the same element of character or merely don't have any at adjectives, when money is the obsession of most contained by the US it is not surprising, even when they try to be funny it just doesn't come past its sell-by date right somehow, besides the fact their TV is so censored that every slight indiscretion is dubbed out, but extreme intimidation is completely okay.

America is a strange odd country to vote the least, still really isolated and ignorant as you can see from the answer that Ragnar give, like most Americans posterior in 1940 while the Brits stood alone aggression for their lives to save the free world, America looked the other opening and he is still thinking the war would enjoy never come to him had we given contained by to the Germans, that is up to that time the Japs attacked Pearl Harbour and then Germany declared time of war on America, what a complete P***k ( thought I had better dub that one a bit for our exceedingly sensitive bible bashing gun toting American audience) So as you can see along beside their poor sense of humour thay have a poor sense of history and the truth to stir with it!!!
You wouldn't second 30 minutes if you approached our shores. You should thank god you are our closest ally.

EDIT: The Queens English is only spoken here by San Francisco queens.
Hmmmm. how come it took you seven years to find that message?

I must have received ten copies of it rear when the Sore/Loserman campaign be fighting the see results.

Richard
What?????

At first I thought you might be for real, consequently I gave up reading.
Very right surmisal of what could be.
You merit an award for such good primer. Well done!

Edit:
Sorry, having read Chris_p2's response, this appears not to be an inspired text. On those grounds, I repeal my above comments.

Always good to spawn efforts to be untested.
Dear Mr. Cleese,
You obviously hold not looked at your position in the world lately. Your country of the 1940's and prior days hold gone. You are in reality a country of big, fat, gross, Pakistani run, badly dressed, unwashed, fearful teeth, rotten boxers,but still trying to tell associates what to do. It wont work Cleese. The fact is you're somewhat island in the middle of the North Sea which nobody recognize anymore.

Remember the 1940's when we saved your neck. You stated then that Americans be oversexed,overpaid, and over here. Our reply was Brits be undersexed,underpaid, and under Eisenhower. Well, equal philosophy still stands.
How 'bout you come to Brooklyn and we'll show you some nice American hospitality for all your venerable efforts...*cracks knuckles*

or do you not know where on earth Brooklyn is? Shame on you, person who happen to be a member of the 100th percentile of idiots who live surrounded by the UK!

Either way I would NOT recommend Tony Blair for president or prime minister or doesn`t matter what because he is the man who told U.S. that Saddam has WMD's. Hello? The GREAT UK is what fueled the Iraq War and later soon after condemned it. Sounds like a bunch of liberals to me. Flippity flop adjectives over the place.

*sigh* I did enjoy the American beer kid. Although it is not your original writing.
and #15 is pretty witty, along beside #9 and #4
John Cleese's diatribe has be around for quite various years now, & have been upsetting a well-mannered few people over that time. There are a few things wrong next to his arguments though:-

Aluminium was discovered by an English metallurgist. He call it: ALUMINUM & ALUMIN. It's present British spelling came after that, from another scientist.

Spelling has changed regularly on both sides of the Atlantic. IZE as a suffix is correct contained by both forms of English. ISE is an affectation started surrounded by the UK in the 1950's to be exact now standard as correct.

'Like' & 'You know' are used by lots of British English speakers, probably as much as by US speakers - innit?

The original form of football is still played regularly surrounded by a town in Staffordshire. It involves holding the globe & running with it. The running aspect is where on earth it got the residence 'football' from. Canadian, US & Aussie Rules Football and Rugby are the nearest versions we hold to the original hobby.

Controls on guns? We have the most stringent gun controls within Europe in the UK, but shoootings are on the increase, along beside the use of knives.

'Chips' be invented in 1909 by a Belgian chef working within a French restaurant in New York. He have been bet a substantial amount that he couldn't invent a exotic dish in 24 hours. He won his bet. 'Fries' is the correct permanent status for them.

'Petrol' and 'Goasoline' are early 20th century brand name. The correct term is PETROLEUM SPIRIT.
I'm american and i get the "humour"... I thought it was a hoot... number 15 that drives me crazy too.
don't agree with the fourth of july one though.. i resembling any holiday that gives you the right to blow up ****
Same attitude you have 230 years ago.

About the guns. . . .

. . .come and get them.

16 baby on the course emancipation??

i am 16 going to be a mom surrounded by June i was wondering if i would be capable of get emancipated?
Answers: if your parents sign..i feel
You need to check the ruling in your state.

If you are living on your own, or competent to pay for your own support, conceivably. In Texas you must be 17 to file a petition for deliverance.

I might caution you that subdivision of the court's decision is base on the maturity of the child requesting nouns, and the fact you get pregnant only mitigates within favor of your needing supervision.

How does the bail bond works?

I often hear a word report that guy was arrested and be released after posting a $100,000 bail. It puzzles me that a barber who was only just arrested could possibly afford to pay $100,000 bail.
Answers: There are various ways to post bail.

The simplest (and cheapest, if you have the money) is to of late give the court the money. So if the court say $100,000 bail, you give the clerk $100,000, and you're moral to go. Show up for court as required, and you draw from your $100,000 back.

The most adjectives, though, is to use a bail bondsman. If the court says $100,000 bail, you supply a bail bondsman $10,000 and promise to pay him the other $90,000 if you skip. He promises to salary the $100,000 to the court if you skip, and they release you. However, even if you show up for court as required, you do NOT get your $10,000 rear - that is, as it be, an insurance premium - it's gone for ever. In most cases the bondsman will also want some sort of collateral from you - the deed to a house, or a promise to be liable from a rich relative, something similar to that.

The third way is a property bond. It's a bit more complex, but it saves you the bondsman's excise. The court may declare your bail to be "$100,000 currency, or $500,000 property". If you (or a friend or relative) owns real estate near a net good point of over $500,000 then the work can be signed over as a bond to the court. If you show up as required the owner gets the creation back, if you don't after the State gets the property.

Richard
A bail bond is similar to an insurance policy, that you purchase. You pay a premium, to the bondsman, and if you don't dance to court he owes the amount of the bail to the court. Usually the bonding company charges about 10%, but they are sometimes allowed to charge more.

In most states the bonding company can bring you to court to relive themselves of the necessity to pay the bail, to be exact where bounty hunters come surrounded by.

Can/should I sue?

I sold my vehicle to the dealership I purchased it from 2.5 months ago. They were supposed to convey the payout cheque to Honda finance after the concordat was complete. They enjoy not sent it and 2 payments have since come out of my sketch. I have be calling them almost every day to find out where on earth and why the cheque was not sent.

For the first month or so they kept giving me the run around and I could update I was individual lied to. Now for the past 3 weeks I own not been competent to get within touch with anyone contained by their office because they do not answer their phones, and they enjoy not returned any of my messages or e-mails.

I recently spoke to Honda and they advise me my account be on the verge of mortal sent into collections. I put a stop payment on my commentary with them going on for a month ago, and they told me if they do not receive the payment for my justification, regardless of whether or not I have the vehicle, they will convey my account to one of their collection agencies...

...suggestions?
Answers: Yes and yes.

And contained by the meantime you SHOULD make the payments to Honda Finance. Your operate with them is completely independant of your agreement with the dealership. Even if, within the end, the pusher pays off Honda, it's still YOUR credit that's going to be poked.

Richard
Start working your channel up the ladder... start by reporting them to the local police force where on earth the deal is located... after that move up to the state police and state attorney generals department... you can also file a complaint beside the better business bureau... but generally speaking that's a misuse of time and effort...

Or you could of late burn the dealership to the ground... the fire would feel nice on a crisp winter darkness...
The above posters are correct - your financing deal next to Honda Finance is completely separate from your subsequent sellback to the dealer.

Do you own a written contract with the trader that requires them to pay stale your loan? I hope so. Do NOT waste time near phone and e-mail messages to the dealer. Those provide you beside no legal protection. Make adjectives communication to the dealer contained by writing via certified mail.

More Questions and Answers:
[1559] - [1944] - [415] - [411] - [921] - [196] - [1563] - [1568] - [2280] - [547] - [2435] - [2199] - [819] - [1178] - [907] - [480] - [2232] - [2283] - [884] - [2432]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: