Law Questions and Answers
Do You Legally Have To Report Corporate Fraud Activity?
If a person know of a small corporation that has fraudulant buzz, (ie personal items and events being charged as company expense, and things resembling that), does one legally hold to report it? Can they go to intern and/or be fined for not reporting?Answers: that guy up there is wrong. you own to report fraud for publicly traded companies. If they get busted and it be known that u know and didnt do anything about it, ur going to catch rocked
No you don't.
With a VERY few exceptions ("mandated reporter" law that require people approaching teachers or doctors to report child foul language, or regulations attached to things like SEC licensed financial professionals) not a soul has a legitimate duty to report a crime.
The ultimate example of this is the shield of David Cash. Cash was having a bet in a casino contained by Nevada when he saw his friend Jeremy Strohmeyer following 9 year old Sherrice Iverson into the ladies bathroom at just about 4am. Cash followed them in after a couple of minutes, to find they be both in a bathroom stall. He go into the next stall and climbed on the form to look over, where he saw Strohmeyer sexually molesting Iverson. Cash simply vanished him to it and went put a bet on to the tables. When Strohmeyer come out, Cash asked him what happened to the girl, and he basically said "I killed her".
Cash never reported this to the police until after Strohmeyer be arrested after telling another friend almost the killing, but the Nevada police be unable to charge Cash beside ANY crime.
Richard
What to say when someones father dies?
Answers: Depends who the father is. If it's Jenna Bush, later you say "congratulations."
If it's someone beside a good father, you in recent times tell them you're sorry and permit them know you will be there for them.
You vote, "I am sorry to hear of your loss, I know he will be missed."
And say it soon, don't spend in dribs and drabs time wondering if it is the right thing to read out. If it is a friend you can also offer to lend a shoulder to cry on, and hug the character.
I am sorry, if there is anything I do, or if you have need of to talk please do not pause to call me.
If I drank too much and kind of put on my X girlfriends lingerie and posed for pictures is she allowed to show
them around in a minute that we are broken up ?Does it matter that she big-hearted of forced me into putting on her lacey bras and panties?
Answers: All I can say is. OMG LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
funny funny man
conceivably u should not drink so much
The pictures cannot be shown to the public without your consent. You can file a criminal charge of undue vexation against your ex-girlfriend.
She sure can. She can put them on My Space, Facebook, power poles or anywhere else. Think before you drink!!
-MM
Probably. If she owns the pictures she can probably do what she requirements with them.
Remember that subsequent time you have a drink.
she is allowed it to show to anyone
Natural Law?
Can anyone tell me what some elemental principles of natural law are or some exaples of natural directive? much thanks if you can answer it.Answers: Natural canon or the law of character (Latin: lex naturalis) is an ethical theory that posits the existence of a ruling whose content is set by nature and that as a consequence has authority everywhere. The phrase natural regulation is sometimes opposed to the positive decree of a given political community, society, or nation-state, and can thus function as a standard by which to criticize that law. In untaught law jurisprudence, then again, the content of positive law cannot be specified without some citation to the natural canon (or something like it); pure law, used surrounded by this sense, can be evoked to criticize decisions almost the statutes, but less so to criticize the canon itself. Natural law can be used synonymously beside natural sprite or natural right (Latin ius naturale), although most contemporary political and legalized theorists separate the two.
Gravity is a law of personality.
Is it illegal to videotape a business?
if they can prove it by their own cameras...Answers: No tenet absolutely prohibits videotape all businesses. That is not to speak that there is no directive concerning he exact business you taped, or the demeanour in which you tape it. For instance, videotaping at a movie show business might be prohibited. Videotaping the security codes would be evidence of intent to steal. Furthermore, while here may be no law, they can sure eject you for it. Just as you could eject someone from your home.
If what you are video taping can be used for "trade infractions."
If you harvest or use any information that shows you confidential information of that business - Yes!
Essay on the death cost?
I have a serious newspaper due on the death penatly,i chose to be against the extermination penalty,
and i stipulation a REALLY creative title for my paper,
can you serve !
Answers: A system which buries its worst mistakes.
two wrongs dont make a right.
Are you with or against the departure penalty? Why?
Answers: Most advocate of capital punishment concede after some discussion that contained by the final analysis, the motive for the death cost is sheer revenge. They hate the hired gun and therefore she must die. Her dying make them feel better: a purely egotistical motive to snuff. Revenge however has no place contained by a civilized society and belongs rather surrounded by the behavior repertoire of kindergardeners. One of the principal reasons for creating a system of sprite is the elimination of act of revenge. To kill a contract killer is the ultimate philosophical capitulation of society surrounded by face of ferocity.
The fact that passing rows are closely guarded in lay down to prevent suicides shows clearly that vengeance combined next to sadism, and not protecting society, is the underlying motive of capital punishment. Not singular do we want her dead, but we want to soak up ourselves in the process, and we want to determine time, place and bearing of the show. However, once we have arranged to act resembling barbarians and let adjectives our darkest instincts surface, why not go adjectives the way? Why stop at psychological torture? Why allow her a nice painless death by poisonous injection? I propose that, in lay down to fully accommodate our desire for revenge, to maximize the deterring effect and to place the highest possible plus on innocent life, murderers should be dragged in the nude through the streets and then slowly tortured to annihilation in public.
Some argue that massacre a killer is cheaper than housing her for the rest of her go; others argue the opposite. The request for information is completely irrelevant: the very discussion shows that society have already acquired the mindset of a hired gun, namely to think that it can be worthwhile to butcher a human being for financial reason. That is precisely what murderers do, and we have no moral right to punish them if we consider doing matching.
I am in favor of the extermination penalty IN CASES WHERE THERE IS NO DOUBT that the convicted slaughterer is guilty--caught on tape, confession including verifiable but illegal details, etc.
I am in favor of the release penalty because executed murderers do not commit other murders. They mostly just feign very still.
I can also approve of the departure penalty for treason, terrorism, espionage, rape, and some types of sexual mishandle of children.
In favor.
I think it should be applied surrounded by any case where on earth
substantial damage have been done to society.
Like the Enron scandal, the Savings & Loan fiasco,
any time a politician is found misappropriating public funds.etc.
An individual murder is trivial compared to the bring down
done to society in these cases.
Use the departure penalty where on earth it ts appropriate!
You don't have to sympathize next to criminals or want them to avoid a terrible punishment to ask if the disappearance penalty prevents or even reduce crime and to think just about the risks of executing innocent people. (Sources below.)
126 those on death rows hold been released beside proof that they were wrongfully convicted. DNA is available within less than 10% of adjectives homicides and isn’t a guarantee we won’t execute innocent people.
The annihilation penalty doesn't prevent others from committing murder. No reputable study shows the disappearance penalty to be a deterrent. To be a deterrent a punishment must be sure and swift. The extermination penalty is neither. Homicide rates are complex in states and regions that hold it than in those that don’t.
We enjoy a good alternative. Life lacking parole is now on paperwork in 48 states. It vehicle what it says. It is sure and swift and once in a while appealed. Life without parole is smaller quantity expensive than the death cost.
The death cost costs much more than life contained by prison, mostly because of the legal process which is supposed to prevent executions of innocent relatives.
The death cost isn't reserved for the worst crimes, but for defendants with the worst lawyer. It doesn't apply to people next to money. When is the last time a well-to-do person be on death row, tolerate alone executed?
The death cost doesn't necessarily help family of murder victims. Murder victim domestic members across the country argue that the drawn-out disappearance penalty process is sensitive for them and that life minus parole is an appropriate alternative.
Problems with speeding up the process. Over 50 of the innocent culture released from death row have already served over a decade. If the process is speeded up we are sure to execute an innocent person.
Two primary reason I'm for the death cost: 1) if the criminal outlives the witnesses, then a crafty attorney and/or a bleeding heart negotiator can figure some track of getting the, by then, ancient guy out of jail because we "obviously" be not as enlightened and sensitive during that prior decade; 2) unless the murder is put down, he is never truly removed from society.
In regard to the second explanation, that murderer will always be within the presence of members of our society, from prison workers to other inmates. We dispatch people to, such as a motor thief to prison to serve a sentence, not be kill by a convicted murderer with nought to lose. I know of one particular bag in which that exact item happened. In Metairie, La. a POS kill a compliant McDonald's asst. manager contained by front of his girlfriend who was waiting for him to carry off of work. ONE juror refuse to convict him of first degree murder, admittedly for the sole justification that he was dead set against the death cost. That scum died within prison, but not before bloodbath a prison employee and massacre his hostage inmate. That juror, by refusing to properly sentence a convicted murderer, kill two innocent people. A murderer is a threat to society until they are departed, period.
i'm agaainst it. I reason too many innocent general public are killed, but afterwards like 5 years next, they found out that that person didn't commmit the crime they be accused of. thats why im against it.
Why can't prostitution be legal and regulated surrounded by every state?
I believe prostitution should be legal near the most strict regulations for sanitation and health , on the other hand only Nevada have this? Why doesn't every state have at lowest one place of their own?Answers: Because even though there is SUPPOSED to be a separation of church and state in attendance really is not.The church wields to much power and feel that it is immoral and indecent.
If they did normalize it and regulate it there would be smaller amount spread of STD'S because they would have to draw from tested regularly and they would also have to money taxes which would help the discount.
Because politicians believe they know better than the rest of us and have to control what consenting adults agree to between themselves.
Richard
Its funny you ask that because it be only lately that the Womans Institute (UK) asked the Government to legalise prostitution as to protect the women involved in it.
Gets them trade rights, see?
I agree beside you 100%. It should be a individuls decision to deside what to do next to their body.
I dont know why Nevada is the only state up to speed. I intuitively wouldnt do it... but I am not discrediting those who would.
There's no reason it *can't* be - but most communities own chosen not to do so. (Even in Nevada, it's merely legal within certain counties.)
because its not a victimless crime.
if the prostitute have any infections or diseases, and gave it to the man, and after the man gave it to the wife, the wife is paying for what he did.
also, we merely kind of hope that culture respect themselves more and could work a real career.
so people arnt degraded dumb a*s,
f*cking mull over before you ask something stupid.
Prostitution is matching as Porn.
There is no difference at all.
If one is endorsed, so should the other, or none at all.
I agree next to Airhim, particularly very soon since we have genetic carrying out tests that sometimes proves without a doubt that populace convicted of murder are innocent.
My second reason for clashing the death cost is the fact that it cause a lot more money to be spent on permissible fees which continue until the prisoner have been murdered.
My third object for opposing the annihilation penalty is it have been proven murdering general public for murder does not lower the murder rate.
My fourth reason is Christianity teach "thou shall not kill." It does not articulate, "thou shall not kill, unless the other personage kills, after you have a free surpass to kill them." Talk in the region of Old Testament justice! Murdering murderers is an exciting sideline among our barbarians. This is also premeditated murder. We send out invitations near the date and time of the murder! We, the supposedly civilized part of the community, should be setting an example of how to solve problems. Murder is not a process to solve problems for the mentally healthy.
The sense for prostitution not being regulated and legalized it primarily an ethical use most people come across to attach a stigmata to the industry that makes it entirely too difficult to pass by the legislation that would allow it and guarantee that they would still be in their positions contained by the next possession.
Within New Zealand in 2003 prostitution be decriminalized and the fights proceeding the bill that allowed for this be primarily from the churches in the country. however the bill be passed the additional clauses that be passed to allow the 'working girls' to participate surrounded by this business were that the girls/guys surrounded by the industry had to be tested for adjectives STI's (same as STD's) every three months to ensure that there be minimal chance for these infections/diseases to be passed on as in good health as this there contained by a legal requirement that during the exchange of services they have to use protection in form of condoms (normal, oral or anal) to minimize the probable hood of any missed sti's being passed on.
Note to the ethnic group that were clich¨¦ that most girls were forced into that opening... a lot of the citizens that i met in my university years be doing that job be clean those that had be trying to get other job but were have too many problems finding them due to want of education and time to take one and were trying to nurture their families, otherwise they be nymphomaniacs that found that the safest way (both disease and to avoid beatings) for them to indulge within their love was to work within that industry, and of the 30 people that i know that did that as a job solely 4 of them did drugs.
Why is New Jersey apologizing for slavery?
It was awkwardly abolished TWO HUNDRED YEARS AGO. People want to just draw from over it and stop crying.Answers: The issue is that not one single person alive today - white or black - be alive when slavery was an reasonable practice...therefore WE are not impacted by it.
I be not part of the Trail of Tears or the pox blankets that my ancestors have to endure...so no one owes me an apology.
The black community requests to toss aside the crutch of "slavery" and "oppression" --- step up to the plate and stop bitching about something that occur long, long before you be born!
Should the jews just achieve over the Holcoust? Why is it we just enjoy to get over it?
Oh sorry I guess since we wernt lucky adequate to have it near in the second 50 years then we should seize over it... and why do are you getting annoyed thought it didnt effect you?
and since you ignorant plenty to say it should be disregarded youre just one of those posers next to no real intellect you of late want drama so i bid you adieu and wont continueby the side of.
I'm not sure, given that New Jersey wasn't a Slave State, and that thousands of white New Jersey soldiers died in the civil time of war to free the slaves in those States that did enjoy slavery.
Richard
How much is too much?
So, I have a well-mannered job, I similar to it. but we never get our checks prompt and theyre never right. how many probability would you give your employer formerly you found another job? its be 3 months and still he hasnt got his exploit together. what would you do?Answers: That is a tricky situation.
Contact your labour board next to regards to you regional policy in connection with your pay. In some jurisdiction you are entitled to a late tax.. However that generally does not aid you in the short occupancy.
I would contract your manager vocally, and in electrical system expressing your concerns and explain that if the situation continues you may need to look for other employment. Emphasize that you do savour your job, however you too own financial obligations and rely upon your earnings coming in.
How much is too much?
12", according to my wife.
Richard
OMG, Richard made a banter! :}~
In my state, every damn employee would own already complained to the Dept of Labor, the IRS, and the sheriff, you don't mess with people's money! :)
The bigger problem is how screwed up is your W2 going to be when you win it at the end of the month? Then it's really a problem, on a in one piece lot of levels. Leave in the past you end up paying off taxes after they send you an amended W2 6 months slowly.
Sounds like poor plenty management that it
would be prudent to bail out up to that time the crash.
Three Months?
Wow - you are a very long-suffering person!
Look for another errand.
XOXOXOXOXO
well I wouldn't quit until I most distinctly get another profession, but I would start looking quickly, my bestfriend be in this situation, but contained by her case she worked @ this livelihood for 2 1/2 months without getting salaried.
More Questions and Answers:
[904] - [1117] - [1627] - [2519] - [1935] - [804] - [1985] - [344] - [1548] - [2453] - [155] - [1279] - [1933] - [2414] - [1667] - [1392] - [1690] - [1658] - [205] - [2531]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: