Law Questions and Answers

Eviction on report?

Is there any method I could get another apartment within Georgia with a 5yr antiquated eviction on my report? I was living next to my ex ani I left 3mth formerly the lease was up but he moved a month back the lease was up in a minute I have this mess on my report! I go to the leasing office and packed out papers to break my part of the lease but I be still stuck with it. Now I requirement to move and im worried I wont get a place
Answers: you should not enjoy to list an eviction to be precise 3 years or older, and if you settled the eviction previously court, then you dont enjoy to list it at adjectives period. i have the same problem
See, here are consequences! you must negotiate with any potential renter!

Is it illeagal to post dating a check?

I post dated a check to Kwick Trip Stores on 12/23/07 and post dated the checks for 1/2/08. The bank sent me an over draft mind saying that the checks that I post dated be cashed. I post dated them because I was'nt going to be paid until Jan. 1, 2008, so it give me enough time to procure to the bank on Jan. 2, 2008 (because the dune was closed on Jan. 1, 08) and put money into my checking explanation. The bank told me that it be illeagal to post date a check. I'm wondering if that is true or not? The Kwick Trip Stores INC. cashed the checks at US Bank within Lacrosse, WI. I have tried to win a hold of the bank to see what's going on. They have'nt contacted me however. I live in the state of Wisconsin and as far as I know it is not illeagal to post date a check.
Answers: It is unquestionably NOT illegal to use a post-dated check. A check which shows a date following than the actual date of execution and delivery, is a check which is not payable until the date arrives. A "post-date" within effect changes the check to a "time paper", which is a totally permissible draft. It was the bank's responsibilty to enjoy checked the date on the draft (check). If the bank erstwhile to do so, the bank would be liable to reimburse you for any guard fees which may have be charged against your account for a "bounced" post dated check. Also, the payee of the check (the entity who received it) cannot complain since they accepted the post-dated draft for a expenditure in the adjectives (the date on which the check was dated for payment).
I DONT suggest it is illegal to post date a check..What I ruminate is illegal is trying to change a post dated check..So the Kwick Trip store or even their bank should be held liable for that.

If writing a post dated check be illegal, the payday loan places wouldnt be within business.
Technically it's true that it is illegal, but "illegal" isn't really the word I would use. Post dating a check simply isn't valid is more correct. It doesn't issue what date you write on the check, once the person have check in foot it is legal for them to lolly it. If you don't have sufficient funds for them to brass the check at that time, then breakdown lays with you.

So the sandbank was without a flaw within their rights to currency the check and charge you an overdraft if you didn't have sufficient funds when it be cashed.
If the Kwick Trip store didn't agree to hold the check for you, and you post-dated the check for the purposes of getting merchandise immediately short having to money for it immediately, consequently that can be considered fraud.

In other words, the person you write the check to have to know it's postdated, and agree to not deposit it until that date.

Just because you put a different date on it doesn't mean they aren't entitled to the money right away.
It's allowed to post date a check.
However, that does not prevent someone from cashing them.
Postdating a check is a non binding agreement between you and the merchant acepting the check.
I bet you didn't even tell the clerk you be post dating them did you?

The clerk at the store should not have even permitted them for payment.
No, I don't estimate it's illegal to post date as long as you own an understanding near whomever your writing the check too not to cash beforehand date you wrote. I bank next to US Bank and have have a great deal of problems near them. I'm not sure if you asked Kwiick trip to hold it or you just assumed it would not step until after the holiday. For some strange reason it works sometimes and other times it doesn't Like I mention unless you enjoy an understanding beside the vendor or personage your giving the check too not to cash until the date, I conjecture they can put it through at any given time and US Bank or any bank will dosh it.

Good luck and Happy New Year
It is illegal to write a check knowing that you do not own enough money contained by your account at the time you write the check to cover it.

You can put anything date you want on a check, but the bank doesn't even look at it, and will bread it on presentation of it.

You are in the wrong here.
It is not private to post-date a check. It is also not illegal to brass a post-dated check. The check can be cashed as soon as you hand it over to someone for reimbursement, regardless of what date you write on it. So no one did anything wrong here.

Woman molests a girl. Girl's father rapes the woman in revenge. Do you report the father? Think b4 you answer

I've asked this grill before but asking again because I notice something interesting. I am not saying he should or shouldn't be reported. What's interesting is that deeply of people own no problems with child molesters human being killed (often within a horrific way). In fact, they'd support it. So does this indicate rape is worse than killing? The broad public seems to enjoy no problems with chilld molesters getting raped surrounded by prison. Or are people's response for the this child molester's fate different because the molester is a woman? Just an scrutiny. It's an ethics request for information for the father and you. Also, if you feel the father is wrong for harm the woman, then it's okay for an inmate to damage the guilty? People also seem to own less of a problem if an inmate provided the "justice" than if a citizen be to do it. Please share your thoughts.
Answers: The woman is wrong. She should be in detention centre and should suffer in young offenders` institution. The father was wrong but understandable. He shouldn't be in put inside but he WILL be in top-security prison, unfortunately. He's a criminal individuals can sympathize with. If the molester be a man, then he should be contained by jail and raped several times contained by jail day after day. If the mother had the molester man raped, next she is justified and true for protecting her children and I sympathize and agree next to her. However, she will land surrounded by jail. I believe the culture who defend their children surrounded by any way, shape or form, are JUSTIFIED.
They're both wrong. Plain and simple.

Only martyr is the girl.
Yes report both the father, and the woman who molested the girl.

The father is basically condoning sex crimes. Total condradiction.

They both obligation to be punished
That's a theoretical give somebody the third degree..we could make those up going on for anything.
Ask a question base on an actual incident that requires an answer.such as OJ actually bloodbath his ex-wife and her boyfriend.
Report both the scumbags. Help the victim.
rape is close to torture and torture is worse then dying
but torture and dying adjectives together is horrible and most moms get foolish cuz theyd hate to hold dat done to der girls or boys
i dnt think so that one should own to live molester. he or she should have to confer a punish for what they did. n one should not forget that crime is crime even if small or big.
As hard as it might be, I hold to go beside the law is the directive. We can't pick and choose which laws we want to fulfil or we're no better than any other criminals.

I think the best response is from A Man For All Seasons:


William Roper: Now you grant the Devil benefit of law!

Sir Thomas More: Yes, what would you do?

William Roper: Cut a road through the regulation to get after the Devil? Yes. I'd cut down every ruling in England to do that.

Sir Thomas More: And when the later law be down, and the Devil turned on you...where would you make disappear, Roper, the laws adjectives being flat? This country is planted gummy with law from coast to coast...Man's laws, not God's, and if you cut them down...and you're only the man to do it...do you really think you could stand adjectives in the loop that would blow then?

Yes. I supply the Devil benefit of law for my own safety's sake.
I hold noticed indistinguishable thing. It is an interesting supervision.

People make decision based on mood not logic. You must have notice this too. Emotional decisions are recurrently also based on misinformation.
I'm still stuck on how does raping the female = revenge?
I think I have need of more facts. If a lady newly "petted" the girl, then she doesn't deserve such an extreme punishment, but if she tied her up, burned her near cigarettes for 3 days while doing horrible things with a bunny rabbit, it would be a different story.
So I surmise I would report the father, unless the lady did some really horrific act on the child.
I see this more as a case of revenge and not above all justice man served. For there to be even-handedness, you need to own a trial with evidence presented. Also, why not report this woman who have molested the child. Both parties are wrong, and the human being who loses is the child. First she loses her innocence because of the molestation, and secondly, she loses her father because he has a short time ago committed a crime.
We have courts for this idea otherwise we would have anarchy.
No the courts don't other serve us, but they are the best we have for presently. We as a people inevitability to be more aware of the persons we elect so we procure better people surrounded by places of power so justice for this little girl could be served.
You are really unnatural. Both should be reported, the woman and the father.
The prison is a correctional facility not a place you go to get hold of raped. Maybe time to get up from the couch and check out the legitimate world?
I've thought about your put somebody through the mill and I must admit. I am torn. First, the style it is supposed to go is molester get reported and goes to prison and both men and women obtain the same length sentences. Failing this, the father should be reported. We give up the right of retribution when we became a nation of law. The father should be reported and the women should be reported. Side by side in court, they should be hand down the same sentence of time.
d father should report d woman I cogitate That would b d beast revenge instead of raping d woman What is d point of trying to protect his daughter that instrument if it will end up him going to top-security prison for rape? I mean He reports d woman n he get to protect his daughter...What good does it create him going to jail aswell he wont know how to protect her in d fuuture consequently.

I dont think its right for inmates to b hurt but if we see it this instrument d inmates feel approaching they have nil to loose they r already there for yrs or even for time they never will get that freedom>>They discern like they r making that personage pay for what they enjoy done.
One crime does not offset the other. Although emotionally a party may justify it, morally both should be punnished.

If I Gave Up My American Citizenship, Would My Financial Debts Vanish?

I am currently a student in college and consdering moving out of the US after graduation for pious.

If I claimed citizenship in another nation such as Italy, what would come up to my financial obligations such as paying off student loans?
Answers: Well the very FIRST examine, of course, is "On what starting place do you have a right to claim Italian citizenship?"

Were you born within Italy? Do you have Italian born parents? If not afterwards you'll need to bring a visa allowing you to live there, live near for several years, and then apply for citizenship.

In most countries if you hold outstanding court action ondebts from another country you won't be eligible even for a visa, permit alone citizenship.

Richard
Let me guess you don't like our country but you are using US Government student loans for your coaching and intend to leave the country contained by order to avoid paying your debts?

If you quit - do you promise never to come back?
You get a great education and are owing little or no interest on the debt to go and get it...yet you want to sleeze out of the business deal? I think they'll find you...Uncle Sam have long arms and this would be fraud against the fed govt.

Is it illegal to experiment on human beings?

Like use humans as check subjects. With consent ofcourse. If they die in the process are you charged beside murder?
Answers: There is a process you have to run through. It depends on what it is you are testing.

For example, let's articulate it was a drug. That would be regulated by the FDA. You would first have to do constant experiments on animals (eg toxicity). Then you would have to record something called an IND, which shows adjectives of the animal studies you did. Only after that is agreed, would it be legal to tryout on humans in the US.

It's relatively a cumbersome process (as it should be), which is why it takes going on for 10 years from the time a drug is invented to when it gets on the open market.

EDIT: Regarding what happens if empire die. That gets complicated. The initial quiz is whether a reasonable being in the shoes of the tester would enjoy expected someone to die. That is not the end of the inquiry, but it's the start.
that happen in India and other 3rd world countries beside developing industries and very little civil rights. they exam new meds on poor nation.
-Did Coke or Pepsi get charged when they kill hundreds?
-Did Union Carbide get charged when they kill hundreds?
Negative
it is illegal simply if it is unethical. for instance, conducting tests the effects of alcohol on pregnant women.

Have you oticed the use of the double D?

The question here is the preventable death of a child because of the breakdown of an insurance company to fulfill its contract with its policy holder.

The double D of the respondents, recognize the contributions of the insurance industry to the RNC have slipped surrounded by the double D. Deception and Diversion. Deception in that they deceptively claim that under a national strength insurance plan things would be worse ( all counties near such a plan have a natural life expectancy of significantly more than the US) and diversion, lets not look at the whereabouts of a major insurance company, let talk almost something else.

How many of you are simple minded ample to fall for this?
Answers: No. I haven't "oticed"
Yes, I identify double Ds every time I see them, but these days I wonder how plentiful are real...

Lawsuit Question - LAWYERS PLEASE ANSWER...?

I recently received a collection mind in the letters stating I owed $150 x2 for 2 red light camera tickets within Washington, DC.

The problem is I never received these alleged tickets in the correspondence (which is usually how you get those tickets). I sent the collection agency a CERTIFIED notification requesting they verify the debt and provide me with evidence since I never received tickets and since the date were over 4 and 5 years ago.

They never responded, I simply checked my credit report and wouldn't you know it, they reported to ALL 3 main credit companies as a deragatory debt.

I was upset and call and demanded a manager. I told the women that I have a sneaking suspicion that it was greatly wrong how they went roughly things and how they violated the FCRA but I said I care around my credit, I will pay you the $300 on the condition that you EXPUNGE the items from adjectives 3 credit reports. Not report them as paid debts but REMOVE THEM completely. After much pushback she finally give in when I told her I would sue.
Answers: 1. I've already looked up their registered agent (they're an LLC) and I'm going to sue them. But can I sue for more than $300 that I compensated?
- You can sue for whatever amount you want, but you won't attain it. There are no damages to you beyond the $300.

2. What would be a good amount to sue for base on my description of the situation?
- See above. Unless you can prove it caused you mental anguish to enjoy these charges show up on your credit and saw a psychiatrist for it, you won't get anything (except possibly your lawful fees paid). Did you miss work while trying to straighten this out? Is it documented as such? You'd need abundantly of evidence which I don't see exists in decree to get anything beyond $300.

3. Do I sue the credit company, or DC Government for never reception the tickets then selling my debt to some collection agency? I'm sure it would be a twinge to sue DC. But who is responsible?
- How do you know they never mailed you the tickets? Things seize lost in the correspondence all the time. Just because you didn't receive them doesn't scrounging they weren't sent. You're making this more trouble than it's worth. You could join them adjectives as defendants, but again...

4. Do I file the suit within my state, or in Wisconsin where on earth the company is located?
- Typically, you have to directory in the county where on earth the occurrence happen, or the county where the defendant or defendant business resides.

PS: There's a website where on earth 18 people made the exact same comment nearly how they were reported on short receiving tickets.
- 18 nation out of how many million who receive tickets? That's probably smaller quantity than 1% of people who achieve tickets. Not going to help you.

I'll be honest next to you. It's absolutely pointless to sue someone for $300. Your permissible fees alone are going to be astronomical in comparison. Some attorneys charge $200 an hour, and believe me, this will require more than an hour of work. It is positively not worth your time. Do what you can to get the 'paid debt' removed from TransUnion, contact the Better Business Bureau if you devise it will help, but in actuality suing the company is not going to be worth your time, your money, or the effort.
I'm sure in attendance are dozens of lawyers newly hanging out at Yahoo! Answers waiting to answer free question!
My advice is contact a material lawyer and salary the fee.
warmth to the world of credit black mail.the modern thing to hold your money with a simulated tax id#.anyone can do this and it is only just starting to rear it's repugnant head.
Sorry, companion. You have no exploit.The purpose of a lawsuit is to compensate victim for foreseeable injure caused by a careless act. In this shield, you've got the added hurdle of trying to sue a public body that can simply argue: 1) it be just a mistake/accident (OPERATIONS); 2) public body as a thing of POLICY has neither the funding nor the infrastructure to run at 100 % efficacy. The public accepts occasional errors as a pretty good cost of public service. You'd lose on both counts.

The second issue is why on EARTH would you spend $50k or more going to court to recover a loss of $300, which you CHOSE to recompense rather than use the miscellaneous procedures already in place at public expense to address precisely the sort of problem you describe. Why did you pay cheque? What was the big hurry? A cc of your collection agency communiqu¨¦ to the credit companies along with a facts to alert them of the error and the fact you be pursuing the matter would hold been enter on the respecitve files until the issue was finally resolved within your favor.

Next time: Work smart, not hard. (Court is VERY HARD - cost $$$ and even if your valise is solid - which yours isn't AT ALL, you can still lose!) Always take the road of least resistance - write a one-page communiqu¨¦ and keep a papertrail. Then dawdle!
I'm not an Attorney, but I am a Paralegal. We just have a situation in our bureau here recently that deal with a claim against a male who owed approximately $5,000. He wanted to take home his defense in court and counter sue. From an economical standpoint we advise to just pay packet it, but he said it was the principal of the thing. Well, we did the work, but it ended up costing him $21,000.00. Most Attorney's don't close to to handle matter based on principal because this is the considerate of thing that happen. So for you as well, from an economical standpoint, it is better in recent times to handle TransUnion and afterwards put this behind you.

Does anybody know the year that the defense of acting under directives no longer was admissible within a court of law?

Any details of net sites with any info on would be gratefully received. Thanks a great deal.
Answers: Check out the Nuremburg War Crimes Tribunal that was held right after WW II.

There is stuff going on right presently in UK which may train up in court. There's a instruction manual on how government official are to manage confidential information such as Health Records. This document be declared top secret, so that standard government workers be not allowed to see the rules. Then they win told to send confidential information here nearby the other place, and they are denied access to the rules how to do it. The person I devise who should face the consequences is whoever it be who decided that the rules be to be a secret from the citizens whose job it be to obey the rules.

What's the legal age to choose which parent u want to live near?

my fiance's kids are 8 &4. mostly the 8 year old cryies that he hate his mother and doesnt even want to live with her. the 4 year on say the same but i suppose he is just following what his brother is proverb. she never has them anyway. her current boyfriend that she jus have another baby beside usually watches them. he is also mean to them and keep them in here room all dy long. the mom and boyfriend sleep surrounded by the living room of the apartment while their baby sleep contained by a seperate room along with the boys surrounded by other rooms. the father and mother both have official shared custody. she was awarded them to live near her because she doesnt work. that is the one and only reason. she also slept near 2 of the town cops (a reason on why they are not together any longer. she is not the greatest mother. but we hold no hard proof on her neglect of the kids. when can the children choose to live with the father?
Answers: That's usually up to a arbiter, but I am sure that the main interest, at this point, would be to hold on to them together. Sometimes a judge will settle to a child in private and lately ask who the child would like to live next to. That might happen beside the eight year old, but not near the four year old.

Listening to them cry that they don't want to move about back must be hugely upsetting for you both. When the kids are with you, start taking report, dated on every page, of what the kids say and do. Don't front them, just agree to them say anything they say - "We have pop tarts for dinner. We have to stay in our room adjectives day" - whatever. Write down the discouraging words they say. They are not getting that from your house.

The object for this is that you want to have something to show a attorney, if you decide to press disregard charges. Lack of proper nutrition is a serious issue, and a series of dates on which the elder child told you they didn't eat properly could be tremendously useful. A legal representative can subpeona things like grocery receipts.

If their mother doesn't work, why is her boyfriend watching them adjectives the time? They are lucky they have you, taking such a motherly interest surrounded by them.

When you two get married, you can budge for full custody. Start keeping the dated notes surrounded by an organized fashion, very soon, so you have something to work near. Buy Gummi Bears multi vitamins for the kids, too. They are the only vitamins kids really seem to be to like, and they will aid keep their strength level superior.
There is no legal age.
The court decide for you
I'm not sure what the age is in New Jersey, but this is a growing problem adjectives over. There is a real involve for family ruling reform. Where I live, it adjectives comes down to the judge you enjoy, and their opinion on the situation. I would strongly suggest you fix together an organization that can give support to you find the laws contained by your area, and distribute you the information you need to label an informed decision. Fathers4Justice is one great operation and we here in Iowa hold an organization call IowaFathers.com. These groups aren't only for father, but for all Non-Custodial parents and fan equal and fair parenting.
In Michigan I surmise its 15 or 16! But I think the 8 year frail might stand a chance surrounded by front of the judge and if her mother seem unfit it might work out in your favor for both children. I would yak to the court system about your situation and see what they read out. Good luck!
If a child is less than 7 years ripened, they are automatically place in the custody of the mother. However, nearby are circumstances that infants and children up to 7 years old are placed below the custody of the father. If these happens, the court decide it for you.

You have to gain a lawyer's opinion on this matter.

aris
This question have been asked over and over beside same answer. There is no age at which a child may decide which parent he/she will live beside in a custody overnight case. What "can" happen is a consider may ask the child who he prefers and why. The judge may lift that choice and use it to decide but bottom column is the judge grant custody based on the child's best interest not the child's desire.

How long do I need to lurk for medical bills to come in since assuming there are no more?

My father died a few months ago. I am the executor of his will. How long do I call for to wait for the medical bills to come surrounded by before I can assume that they be all taken meticulousness of by Medicare or the insurance company? I am having difficulty even getting statements from them because of the HIPA law. Can anyone help? Please? I would resembling to settle his estate sooner rather than after that.
Answers: as executor all reimbursement or account payable documentation must go to you HIPAA is not an issue. you do not involve medical records adjectives you need is billing information.

(in adjectives the jurisdictions i know of) you can place an append in the classifieds letting anyone who have a claim against the estate know they must present their claim by a set date. it does vary as to how long that date is and how lots times you must run the classified. here it is 90 days and the add must run 3 times contained by a 4 week period.


the following intermingle will give you the information something like HIPAA
page 11 states that the representative of the estate has adjectives the same rights as the individual contained by regards to information whoever have told you they can not give you the needed information is wrong . lots do not know what HIPAA actually states so the answer is other they can't give you the info. check the cooperation page 11 and then ring up them back you will acquire a different response.
http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacysummary.pd...
There really isn't any sort of set time limit, simply because so oodles different charges are made and numerous organizations enjoy their fingers in the pie, so to speak. For example, a single call on to the ER can generate more than five different bills, each one administered differently. It's the mess we hold to deal beside in strength care today, down in the dumps to say. I do know that it can sometimes hold a year or more to settle estates, depending on the financial status of the deceased. Generally speaking, the wealthier the character the longer the time to settle.

My condolences on your loss.
Who is the health aid proxy? They are the one who has access to adjectives health information.

More Questions and Answers:
[952] - [2075] - [1589] - [2011] - [1438] - [1859] - [1452] - [2457] - [514] - [581] - [320] - [1820] - [459] - [1767] - [1289] - [2045] - [1644] - [2072] - [375] - [417]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: