Law Questions and Answers
Are pictures enough proof you have own an animal?
I am curious if anyone knows if taking a picture of an animal is plenty proof that you do or had once owned it. I am not sure how one would walk about documenting it surrounded by case someone did something to them or it I could record charges if thats even possible for the type of animals I have lol.I own many spiders and scorpions by the track and I just want to be sure merely in travel case if anyone I am living with decide to use a can of raid to my critters, I can sue them. Not aphorism its going to happen, lately want to be prepared.
Anyone know how one would go around it?
Answers: Pictures are good. But you might inevitability more. Like receipts for different services.
Sue for dead spiders.after an autopsy without question.
I think you're on shrunken legal ground near or without pictures here,
Huckabee supporters . . . Please explain . . .?
What is the attraction that makes you overlook the reality that this is a man who wanted to quarantine AIDS patients, didn't bother to read the national intelligence report concerning Iran, think Pakistani immigrants are a significant source of crooked immigrants, and crossed picket lines to appear on a tell show? You might be able to explain away one or not protection about another, but how do still support him given adjectives these factors combined? Thanks.Answers: To affix to your Huckabee observations. As Governor of Arkansas, Huckabee pardoned more than 700 convicted criminals, that's more than any other Governor. He released convicted rapists and murderers subsidise to the neighborhood. Mike Huckabee also disagreed with rounding up illicit immigrants and requests to give state money to the children of illegals so they can attend college, adjectives while taxpaying Arkansans mortgage their homes, use their savings and borrow money to put their children surrounded by school.
I devise we are just starting to see only what a nut job Huckabee is.
I agree beside all those things.
By the course, did YOU read that report?
Didn't think so.
Why do liberals sponsor federal give a aways instead of making honest paying jobs?
Answers: Because they want you to rely on them and thus hold on to them in organization. It slike the neighborhood cat onc eyou feed him he keep coming back until you stop
Why do conservatives hold corporate welfare?
http://www.progress.org/banneker/cw.html
Because they get more votes when they mitt MY money out to poor people.
Basically to find votes from those on the dole.
...because the Republicans shipped all the moral paying jobs offshore?
...because liberals want to bring our tax dollars and supply it to poor people, while the conservatives want to bequeath it to rich people within the form of even more tax breaks for the ultra-useless and sumptuous?
Because government wouldn't know how to cause a good paying post if it tried?
Dunno. Hard to say. But it is demonstrable that your question shows a large amount of bias, and arrogance. I hope that you enjoy answers deliver in like mode.
Check out Bill Clinton's job growth while he be president. I guess because he was a democrat, that finances it was an happenstance. I think not. Clinton also signed the Welfare Reform Bill of 1996. This cut welfare by 85% and is still within force.
Something has to be done beside health protection because many hospitals are going broke due to the number of inhabitants who are unable to afford insurance or clear their hospital bills. Its not just a give-away. People still enjoy to pay for it. They are address this problem because if we don't, we will all enjoy a problem getting health safekeeping, insurance or not.
Liberals also tend to sponsor job training programs.
What federal givaways are you discussion about?
Liberals clear good paying job. Our economy during both your energy time and mind, has be better for working people when liberals controlled Congress and the White House. During the depression, much of the national parks and other national structures surrounded by which we take pride, be built by out of work people who get jobs and bookish trades and all of that come from the US Government. You need to accord with the history and practice of what you want to address about.
Can you have a final divorce audible range trought videoconferance?!?
I'm in the military and the adjudicate gave me this route...what do you think just about it?Answers: According to the state law if you hold a lawyer present on both sites it is doable as long as both the participant are within like peas in a pod state or even the usa.
Do you think you hold to be a good hole to be a good attorney?How can a lawyer protect someone if he knows they--
guilty?Consider Phil Spector,O J Simpson,lately because they did not get convicted,doesn't be a sign of they are innocent.How can a lawyer on purpose help trash like that.These aren't the single ones there are probably thousands that are set free & their lawyer know they are guilty but they defend them anyway.Reckon at hand will be any lawyers contained by heaven?Answers: No, you involve to be good at creating doubt surrounded by the minds of average people. "If the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit." Brilliant!
It may not give the impression of being honest but the glove was a push button piece of evidence linking O.J. to the murder, the defense created "reasonable doubt", here you hold a bloody glove in O.J.'s patio, with the victim's DNA on it and it clear didn't fit on his foot, it sort of looked like someone planted it. ure possibly the glove shrunk (I've never had a glove shrink) or O.J.'s paw grew, but it really looked way to small for him, adjectives the other evidence was also explainable, even if far-fetched. Nothing give or take a few that was a pretend.
no you do not lie to guard someone you just prove ways within how to help them lower their sentence ok
i expect you cant help everyone ok :)
xxx
because their haunted with money and thats adjectives their thinking about.
S
A
D
x x x x
a lawyer job is not to fiction to defend his client, it is in fact to use the clues to show that he did not do that, or he might have not done it. AND that is to say how a lawyer does his employment.
In another way, a lawyer job is to verbs the truth using evidence. if he builds doubt then he have won the case.
agree to me start by saying tht
a lawyer job is not to pull the wool over your eyes but to put doubt in the mind of the judge/jury
a murder can not be convicted if nearby is reasonable doubt
and if u can prove or put doubt surrounded by a the mind of a judge tht ur dog did not rupture down ur nieghbours fence them im pretty sure they cant be convicted any
so in lame man term the a moment ago need to show flaws within the other party's story (im tlkin only nearly defense lawyers here since ur Q is more aimed at them and geitn ethnic group off the hook)
you dont hold to b a good storyteller
in reality my opinion is tht lawyer dont lie
a bit they find ways to answer truthfully or find a loop hole in the interview and asnwer tht
for example
if u were to ask me "do u knw who the Beatles are"
one could say aloud yes they r a band
or not know them at adjectives
now if i be in court and this be asked to me i would say
No (even thou i knw they are a band)the sense being i know OF them i know WHAT THEY DO and WHOS IN THE BAND
but i dnt KNOW THEM (personally or anything a bout them where on earth they grew up etc) so technically im not lying
im just not answering the target u had wen asking the quiz and if i got caught doing this its uncomplicated to say 'wel i mis implied ur Q' thus i woudl not get surrounded by trouble
its just similar to wen ur teacher say to u knw phones in class
powerfully the key word is phoneS ego bring my phone into class and not phoneS thus i would no be breaking the school rule
I'm gonna articulate YES! My reason for adage that is because my husbands kith and kin has 4 lawyer's contained by it and they are the biggest liars I have ever see.
They don't care if the being is guilty or not. Money is all that matter to them. I'm not saying adjectives lawyer's are this way. I'm sure their are some that are outstandingly legitimate.
unhappily , to be a lawyer , a politician , a mediatic your first skill must be lying .
Thanks
No but it help to be a good speller.
No, I do not presume you need to be a upright liar to be a perfect lawyer. Just the contrasting.
Lawyers defend clients they know to be guilty because the constitution of the United States and every state within this country guarantee a fair trial and, for felony charges, a advocate to represent you if you cannot afford one. Implicit in the constitutional right to a lawer is the right to an important lawyer, that is to say one who will represent their client with skill. A advocate who who will put the state to its burden of proof, a burden the state has within every case. It is not immoral to make the state tolerate its burden of proof in a criminal shield.
Lawyers who know their clients are guilty may not do certain things inside the rules of professional responsibility. For instance, they cannot call a witness that they know will deceit on the stand, nor can they say to the jury "My client is an innocent man" when they know to be precise not true. What a lawyer can do is convey the jury that the state has the burden of proof and if they do not stumble upon it, their duty is to acquit, even if they think the defendant is probably guilty. In this country, probably is not close ample. A person is presumed innocent unless the state proves the creature is guilty beyond every reasonable doubt.
You may not similar to the results in some cases (like O.J) and I may not any. But the safeguards that are given to the truly guilty, are equal ones that keep the innocent free.
So, thank God tonight for our system of equality, that presumes a person to be innocent, that prevents the police from coming into our homes at any time, lacking or without explanation, that protects us against coercive interrogation tactics, that prevents individuals from being punished excessively. It is only one thing that make this country great!
Do you think criminals own more rights then victims?
i am so tired of the victims have no right's, and the criminals having so tons rights. Why does the courts let the lawyer get away next to it. How can we change the law.Answers: The legal system sucks big time, it also lacks consistency.
There be proof of it in a baggage here 18 months ago, a child molester got 2 years for assaulting a 12 year antediluvian girl, a drink driver on his fourth offence get 5 years..wheres the justice for the kid?
It is really bleak when you cannot know what they have a history of doing formerly. All things no matter how it be found out should be given to the courts. No getting off on a technicality.
By like peas in a pod token they should be darn sure they got the right character and he was interrogated into signing anything to gain to use the bathroom or some other thing.
Then the victum have the right to face her accuser if they want to. It is other going to be a guessing game and who have the money and gets the best attorney get by with the crime.
To several times poor people be in motion to jail for stuff they didn't do.
I used to work contained by a Mens prison here in the state of IOWA,, and its so disgusting the approach the employee get treated,,the inmates(thats what we are to call them!!)can name us any name they wanted(if we swore or call them names,we would grasp into trouble!!),,spit on us,,attack us,disrespect us,,,complain almost everyday for the food they get to devour!! ( big steaks on holidays!!),,they got better food to drink then what I could afford to buy for myself!! they would report complaints when they we're served "nuetra sweet sugar" instead of regular sugar!
they are clothed,,get medicall attention!!!(that we remuneration for) those in prison acquire treated better then those living without a roof over your head,,,,,,,,,,,,,,and my personal opinion,,the passing penalty should be used for rapist,murderer's,child molesters,,why should we house them for natural life!!! if you only know what it cost to keep one human being in prison!!
Westvirginia childsupport laws?
My ex have not paid childsupport since oct25,2007 until that time that he would pay one month miss a month pay envelope again so on so on.I was told nearby was zilch criminal I could do unless he missed 6 months in a row or be $8,000.00 behind.Is this true?He is after adjectives court ordered to pay $349.00 a month for my two daughters.thats not a piece thats 349.00 contained by all.Why net it court ordered if all he pays is perchance 100 here or 50 there later nothing be done to him?Answers: I am within WI. Here if your ex is behind they intercept their Income Taxes first. My ex is $1,189.00 aft in Child Support. I haven't done anything around it because I know he's working and child support is coming out of his check weekly. You really need to contact another attorney, even if it's a phone give the name to see what can be done. Don't believe something if you don't have the facts. You could also try search online. Best of luck. I understand how you touch.
The Child Support bureau can garnish his income excise return and also have his drivers license suspended for failure to pay. Your case is not even close to one a major problem to anyone but you. I enjoy seen thousands of dollars owed up to that time anything is done. Not paying your attorney is a personal problem that you need to business deal with. This is why most of them expect salary in mortgage.
Does it scare you to muse how easy it would be for someone to frame you & go and get you locked up?
In Texas there own been just about 30 people found innocent who spent time contained by prison for crimes they did not commit.Thats awful to be behind bar your whole life span gone knowing that you are not guilty.Do they give these relations any kind of money for time spent locked up? If they dont next they should.Answers: yeah i remember hearing almost this guy in michigan who be locked up for 20 years and he was given approaching 56k(average income for that state, like within the 80's) for each year he be in prison, he later turned around and sued for false imprisonment and won similar to 23 million dollars. so yes in some cases they are given money for losses, but no amount of money is worth 20 years of freedom to me.
Anyone lately get convicted and found not guilty?
I ponder that now, near all of the forensic evidence, it is nearly impossible for a being to be falsely convicted. Sure, rapist from 20 years ago are one acquitted, but I'm doubtful that this sort of piece is as rampant as you imply.
And yes, general public are "reimbursed" when they are let out of prison unfairly accused. But who can put a price label on the value of your years?
I agree next to (Yo Its Me). It's all in the region of who you associate with and are friends near. I mean even the citizens who are in prison and technically shouldn't be at hand usually have a severely shady past. You can report to alot by a person according to who their friends are. That doesn't anticipate I think it's ok for family to be in detention centre who don't belong there, but if you don't hang up around with unseemly individuals you own nothing to verbs about. As my mother used to enunciate "You play with fire and eventually you'll take burned." So to answer your question, No.
What is the punishment for bigamy?
Answers: Two mothers-in-law
the punishment is you have two wives to drive you insane.
Also the state may enjoy some sort of penalty
any man that have two wifes is being punished ample,
after that theres only recovery,,,,
for the women,,, only fooling around,,,,,,,
that would depend on exactly what they do.
like surrounded by a hate crime seance.
if they don't do anything after you can't punish them,
this is America, and you can't punish someone for what they think.
if you know a bigot next avoid them.
WIth more and more immigration from Islamic countries (Islamic marriage can include up to 4 wives if the husband can afford it) the punishments are becoming smaller quantity severe. However if the husband picks a ruthless female barbarian steadfast to "taking him out", and consuming his account instead of a nice Christian wife who is a well brought-up cook, it's all over. The punishment is loss, ca va sans dire.
Drug needles laying out surrounded by the yard?
i live within tennessee and there is a neighbor i own that has surenges lay all contained by his back patio .dogs pick them up and carry them into other yard i also have a neighbor that have 3 small children i worry nearly getting a hold of one of them i have told her roughly them and told her to watch out how do i turn this being in so someone will verbs it up.i dont know what these needles have surrounded by them as wellAnswers: Well the police should do something because as far as you know they could be for illegitimate purposes. Nobodywould fault you for this assumption because if one be a diabetic they would probably dispose of the needles properly. This is one angle to use in calling around. Depending on the situation note that people come and progress at all hours, lots of cars or discernible partying is going on would be a help.
The condition department would be very interested regardless of what they contained or if the human being has a permitted use for them. A child could pick one up and play with one or anybody could even step one one. The risks could run to HIV, Hepatitus and a host of other things. There is a origin many police hold teflon lined gloves that they use when pat someone down.
Write down every contact that you have w. anybody as this would be adjectives later if you enjoy to take it to a high level such as the state vigour dept., the state police or a DA.
It could be as simple as that the person is not disposing of needles properly and the dogs are getting into the neighbors trash. But you own every reason to be concerned and to bring back the authorities involved.
i would call the police,,,a public vigour threat is defiantly present,, i wouldn't touch them, u don't know who adjectives used them or what they contained in them,,,,
More Questions and Answers:
[579] - [323] - [2090] - [1354] - [2516] - [1347] - [2054] - [2132] - [912] - [811] - [2065] - [965] - [1570] - [1670] - [643] - [1747] - [657] - [586] - [1137] - [160]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: