Law Questions and Answers
Anyone work for or been call by United Readers services?
I was call yesterday, yes they tricked me soooo good. any way i done up subscribing to a 24 month payment of 40 dollars, and they sed i have to be 21 but im only 20 and they lied within the recording, they be doign this so fast i have no think to conjecture. i wanna know if they will cancel my subscription when i ring up back on monday and if they dont what court actions should i lug? cancel my card? read out its a fraud? have u ever talk to them? or do u work for them? if u do let me know what happen next.Answers: You rewarded by credit card?
If they called you, by regulation you have a 3-day withdrawal period.
If they discard, you can notify your credit card company that you are rejecting this transaction.
No need to end your card.
No need to be such a martyr.
The age of sexual consent in the UK is 16. Should this be lowered or raise?
In many European countries the age of sexual consent is 14 or 15. In Spain it is 13. The average age for a woman to hold menarche(first menstruation) is 12.5. Should the age of sexual consent be lowered? Or is 16 actually too low, and should it be raise to 18, in direct to promote a more responsible approach to sexual intercourse, and make it harder for predatory adults?Answers: Whatever the age of consent should be, it doesn't construct sense to say one item in imperative, and another everywhere else.
TV, music, advertising, adjectives give out the message that sex is The Most Important Thing.
Children are exposed to this adjectives the time.
I'm certainly no puritan, but to elevate the age of consent whilst continuing to allow commercial interest to exploit our young empire in this mode would be hypocritical and useless.
People learn by example, not by law.
I think 16 is the uncovered minimum age to be honest,
Personally I believe it should be when the person feel ready.
Thank you :)
18 I surface is so much more responsible.
I think 16 is rather a good age. I would maintain it the same.
I give attention to for many childlike people, below 16 is too untimely, and its important to protect them from predators. Many of the worst predators won't be put past its sell-by date by laws anyway, despondently.
Many young nation are emotionally mature satisfactory to have a sexual relationship by 16, and I don't estimate it would be fair on them to tilt the age.
Its important for parents and teacher to help school young citizens about these decision.
16 is a good age as long as the girl is hot. For shocking ones, it should be 30.
Okay, seriously...I'd like to see age of consent be like as age of majority, everywhere in the world.
I regard 16 is fair ample, although we all know a proportion of those younger will other have sex.
What the prominent thing is, is to prevent treat roughly by anyone older than 16 on such innocent and adjectives minds.
it should be raised. 13 yrs. have sex????? what were they thinking within spain?
it should be 18 yrs.
Raised to 18 for both sexes.
I don't think that the age of consent is the problem. The item is to STOP over 18s to have sex beside under 18s.
In France as an example, over 18s can't own sex with a miner which I found righteous to protect our children.
25..and a chastity belt!!!
It should be neither lowered or raised. I guess 16 is right. You can marry at 16. How could you marry but not have sex officially?
18. PERIOD. I wasnt an adult by any money at 16, even though I was moderately mature. The frontal lobe of your brain does not fuse near the rest until you're in precipitate adolescense, and you cant make honest decisions until that point, you're practically incapable of it. We enjoy to protect that.
I believe it should be raised but it wont be paid any difference anyway no one is ever deal with properly by the statute in underage sex
its OK as it is, but teenagers shouldn't be aloud to hold sex with non teenagers, to keep hold of predatory adults at bay, i suggest you hold to reach 20 since the world is your oyster, [unless you are in an existing relationship when you turn 20] your parents should after apply for your nookie licence so you can carry on beside an existing partner, if that relationship finishes, then so does the licence, this should also apply to gay sex to
I clearly dont believe the age of consent should be lowered despite as you correctly point out,that nature dictates the wonderful age for pregnancy is 14.
If everyone started families at 14 we would be surrounded by a whole lot of trouble.
I am however,concerned that even 16 years olds are too embryonic to be giving birth,so we could say to be precise argument for raising the age of consent.However,I wouldnt dream up anything would change.Unfortunately the drop within standards suffered over the last 10 years system no one if truth be told bats an eyelid when even 12 year hoary give birth.
Summing up,I recommend that the age of consent remains like peas in a pod but there should be smaller quantity privileges for young girls who bring pregnant irresponsibly or indeed for a council house.
As John Major said "back to basics",is something we really inevitability to look at.
Lets put this another way if you incline the age nearly every teenager within the land will be breaking the tenet, if 16 is the age of consent it is reasonable to muse most boys and girls will be thinking of breaking it at 14, however if you lower the age to 14 they will be thinking about breaking the regulation at 12, you get my drift, everybody know kids will experiment but we have to own a law that will deter adults from taking help an also so youngsters are not pressurised into having sex earlier they are ready
little footnote for kevin friend contained by England you can get married at 16 beside a parents consent, do you expect a married couple to wait for 4 years lol
Might as powerfully be left at the age it's at.
No one pays any attention to it anyway.
lurk a second! theres a legal age as to when you can hold sex in the uk?!?
or is it resembling here in the us when you can hold sex whenever but its illegal if one creature has sex next to someone under the age of 18
//or if your still an young person (under 18) there cannot be more than a two year age crevice
// or in the covering of being 18 or 19 they can be two years yonger which is underage.
and if these are violated its saggitorial rape... not that masses people listen to this rule but its used contained by court cases alot
Remember that laws contained by countries such as Spain (or even England for that matter!) are VERY older! The Spanish would NOT tolerate someone travelling to Spain and having sex beside a 15 year old.
16 is around right. You can marry at 16 in England (with parental consent) or minus consent in Scotland, so 16 would be the correct age of consent. No business what it is, there will other be underage people have sex.
AMERICANS - why are you answering this Q?
Christine - any 2 people over 16 may enjoy sex, regardless of any age difference, under English regulation. If one of them is under 16, it is unlawful sex. If one is underneath 13, it is statutory rape. Where BOTH are over 12, and under 16, the elder one commits an offence, but it uncommonly bings a prosecution or any action of any sympathetic, particularly if they are especially near to one 16.
raised to 18
jane
We adjectives - male and womanly - develop at different rates. Thus we have shy virgins within their twenties and sexually aware and experienced others in their teens. A rank has to be drawn somewhere and I conjecture sixteen is about right. You can't stop your hormones. However I - a secular atheist and father of two girls - do believe that society should hold a moral structure to protect our vulnerable childish.
How does a innocent young black man pummel a felony drug charge?
Answers: Plead not guilty, go to trial and shelter the case. Contrary to what some believe, not a soul in the system care enough give or take a few one defendant in a drug covering to fabricate evidence or to waste time and resources prosecuting someone who is innocent. The difficulty arises because some folks own an incorrect notion of "innocent." For example, offering to sell cocaine, when the substance is not if truth be told cocaine, is still a felony just as serious as selling actual cocaine. Sharing some dope beside a friend is the same as selling the dope. People regularly try to defend a possession charge by claiming that it be someone else's drugs but the law of possession does not hinge on ownership. It hinge on access and knowledge. So, if you know here is dope in your coup¨¦, and it is accessible, the fact that someone else owns it is no defense.
dont accomplishment black.
Is having hot sex contained by a public library moral?
do you think george have some wild sex beside laura in the library where on earth she worked after the doors were locked, after doing a few linesAnswers: C'mon, can you REALLY interpret George having 'hot' or 'wild' sex near ANYBODY? Besides, I don't think he's ever certainly been IN a library. There are books within ya know. He would be in vulnerability of learning something.
If you have Hot sex then its moral but average sex is completley wrong
sorry i just thought the agency you sentenced this...setence was amusing, polite day to you ma'am
oh and doing lines? be this a school libary
"i must not snort cocain and own Hot sex"
George dose not do lines you must have him confused beside O BUM A
Should I buy a gun?
The crime in my town is getting unbridled. I have be burglarized three times in the concluding year. No, I don't live in the ghetto. It's a middle class neighborhood. I've get retired policemen and military living next door. But, I can't afford to live within a better home, and frankly, I do not feel sheltered in my own home. I am not against guns, but I really own never felt the requirement to own one. I'm more of a non-violent person. But, if someone broke into my home, I sure would touch better about putting some front in their *** than smashing them next to my Louisville slugger. I've already installed a security system and hold a dog. Is a gun really the next step, or should I a moment ago move into a nicer neighborhood and be broke all the time because 60% of my income will jump to rent?Answers: There are several things to consider in your situation.
The first and foremost is that have a gun cannot help you unless you are in that to use it. Smart thieves (is in attendance such a thing as a smart poacher???) will wait until you are not at home to rob you. Your gun will solitary be another thing they will steal.
You might be better past its sell-by date varying your habits a bit so thieve have a firm time guessing when you are home or not. Get a couple of timers to turn lights on and off at bizarre times. Get a timer to turn on a telly or radio from time to time. Get an alarm that makes profoundly of noise BEFORE the burglar enters your premises (your neighbours might not close to the noises, but it will aid them in the long run as well).
Also, near are things you can do to make your home more difficult to break into. Iron grilles over window, metal doors in metal frames near deadbolts, and other similar things along those lines.
gun safety NEEDS to come back buying a gun.
and it sounds like you're clueless pertaining to gun safety.
***
trying to shoot an intruder is stupid. so is taking a baseball bat to them. that globe player in Florida have a machete -- all he did be get one of the intruders worried, so they shot him and he died.
If you're going to shoot, what you shoot is the biggest window you can without risk see. the noise and crash tell the intruders that you are armed and willing to shoot. they will plausible flee. you do not want them to see you at all so they won't try to shoot vertebrae.
I believe a person have the right to protect themselves. Alarm systems and dogs are only deterrents. Bad guys can smash and grasp in second. Depending on your location, police response is between 20 minutes and 2 hours for non-life threatening calls. Unfortunately, these situations can enjoy deadly outcomes.
As I enjoy stated, I believe in the right to protect yourself. But, I also believe contained by education and training. Before you purchase a firearm of any type, do some research. You inevitability to know the laws, types of firearms and their pros and cons, possible ammunition types and their availibility. Once you carry a handle on what you want, what you can fiddle with, and what's legal, consequently get the training. If your state allows for concealed handgun get, then I would draw from this training and license even if you do not intend to carry a firearm. There is no such point as too much training and education.
Some populace believe the 12 guage shotgun is the best self defense weapon. For some people, this might be more gun afterwards you can handle. One preference is the 20 guage. Easier to use handle, but still dangerous. Samething with handgun. Bigger is not always better. Shooting someone beside a 22 is better then missing next to a cannon. What ever you choose, you need to practice. If you do not soak up shooting your gun, then you will not practice commonly. In a life threatening situation, you will automatically non-attendance to your level of training.
One ultimate comment. You need to turn out your heart and soul and decide if you can thieve the life of a human. If you can't, afterwards having a gun is nil more then a weapon for them to snatch and use against you.
I hope this help with your finding. Good luck.
No gun in the world is going to protect your home when you aren't at hand.
if you qualify for a concealed carry certification - good.
Can you set up a 'Block Watch' sensitive of program with your neighbors ?
I failed my third pbt oral exam yesterday. know i have to shift before the sort out what do you think might transpire to me?
Answers: If your on probation your looking at serving the remainder of your time. If you were not given time to start beside and only probation you are immediately looking at time. You really need to step up and stop spitting within the eye of a 2nd chance, your solitary going to get so lots.
Good Luck
I am guessing that you are an adult and that you are on probation for a prior crime and that a condition of probation be no drinking. If that is the skin, you have three times essentially told the style guru that you are unable or unwilling to comply near the conditions that keep the productive sentence from being imposed. The peacemaker will impose the sentence for the ingenious crime. There are judges that pass second and third chances, but if you own been caught beside alcohol in your system three times, the court will pass off the sentence for the original crime.
Emancipation in Florida? What are the rules?
Getting emancipated at 16 contained by Florida.Does everything have to step through a court?
And also, do you have to own a real function? What about if you're newly ready to win out, but you show real old age and responsiblity? Is it still possible?
No negative feedback please. I'm only looking at the rules to this.
Answers: First problem you going to face is this. In FL its the parents who must directory the petition. If they wont its over
The rule as you have asked for is that you own to show that you are totally able to support yourself. This requires a large amount of money. Even if you had money you own to prove that your parents are the most horrible on the planet.
If your parents even tried to sign off on it the court will most expected make you a ward of the state while it is human being resolved. If they disagree much pain and trauma will come to pass to your whole familial.
What's the best way?
What's the best approach to try to get emancipated if I don't already own a job. I'm trying my hardest to gain a job right immediately, so I'm not trying to take the straightforward way out and cut corners, I'm of late wondering if anyone has any tips on how I could gain my petition granted without a profession.Answers: You can't. And even if you tried things will become absolutly horrible. A job making $12 an hour will not cut it as you could not sign a lease or any contract. Car insurance would be invalid as well.
Attempt it and child services will progress to town on your whole domestic.
you have to own a job. you enjoy to be able to prove to the court system that you are responsible and able of taking care of yourself---such as paying your own bills. if you don't hold a job, you won't capture emancipated
Child support increase,Minnesota?
I have be divorced for 13 years. My ex has not raise the support with the cost of living expences regularly.With one child solely 1 year from college I would like the support to verbs through-out the college years. Not to increase the support unless needed.
My question is who do I involve to seek assistance to officially accomplish this?
Answers: It should have be stated in your divorce papers. I'm not sure more or less this. Usually it will say that support is to verbs until child is 18 or enrolled within college. Contact an attorney, they should be able to bequeath you advice over the phone. I am surrounded by WI.
Child support does not get "cost of living" increases automatically. It is/was a court result and you will need to jump back to court to get hold of any changes.
Will you join my petition to heading and shame absent parents?
Hi within,Do you want to Name and Shame an Absent Parent? Visit
www.whydontyouloveme.co.uk and sign the
Petition to change law in Naming and Shaming
Absent Parents. This petition will be sent to Gordon Brown on 25th March 2008. Feel free to go past on the website details to everyone you know so they can support us too.
I look forward to your co-operation
Warm Wishes
Caroline
Whydontyouloveme.co.uk
Does your child ask about an left parent? Does this absent parent not
support his/her child? Then check out www.whydontyouloveme.co.uk
Answers: Yes the not here parent has responsibilities to their kids. LIKE PAYING FOR THEM! Yea designation & shame them. I came across a guy who have two kids in a previous marrige & get upset when hes asked to contribute to there upbringing because hes get two more kids with his modern partner. It makes me sick. If me & my partner split up I would still love & contribute to my childerens upbringing.
There will other be exceptions. For example if you are denined access to your childeren. But too many individuals walk away, start modern lives & expect the state to bring up thier children who ultimatly they should be responsible for. My parrents split when I was nine years frail. But my farther did not have any childeren beside his new partner because he had responsibilities to us his first two childeren. He could not afford both. There are lots of thoughtless people out at hand. I have met heaps in my time.
I am not man judgemental. Its what i have see &what I have come across. I will stick next to my own experiances. But will listern to others.
err no.
perhaps you may enjoy too much time on your hands perchance. do something constructive for the kids who need it fairly than following your need to take back at someone.
No I won't enrol. I think it's indicate site for you to get stern at others for your own ends and I say that as the child of an fictional parent (I'm an adult now) who suffered like mad.
There are many reason that couples part ways, some are lawful and valid, while others are more ignorance and stupidity. I can not and never will advocate a couple staying together strictly for the children's sake. This is not right or event to the two adults involved. HOWEVER: While I don't think that publicly degrading one parent is right, I would support the public humiliation of those who leave and do not fulfill their parental obligation such as visiting (even parcels or phone calls), and child support, etc...
No witch hunts aren't for me. Maybe their will be cases when its deserved but how could you tell your not persecute someone who maybe doesn't deserve it within all cases.
yh i do grain the absence of my parents n it make me damn angry and depressed
but dat dont mean im gonna sign d petition
agree wit ed - d administration needs to save its nose outta soul family stuff
moniker and shame wtf some absent parents enjoy reasons.
why not turn the hole hog and name and shame the parents that stop the other parent from seeing their child
I think through your passion for this, but cannot condone the act. Some absent parents are better lacking any contact, financially or otherwise. Take a drug lord for example.
i will not!!!!support you because most absent parents are men. by the process who have be refused the opportunity to see their kids by their ex-wives/ girl friends out of spite and most of the time surrounded by violation of court advice. this is done even after the farther proves he is a fit parent. and the court give visitation or shared custody..
so don't look for my cooperation and or many other away from home fathers any. you got some self-assurance madam
how about you autograph and shame those who wont let the other parent see their kids. my kids know who i am and i love them. !!!!! how roughly their mom who keeps hiding and moving so i can't see them.
This is Q & As not a soap box for the dissalusioned.
No I wll not connect your petition.
If you are agrieved take redress surrounded by the law. There are adequate laws protecting children so filch your pick.
I agree 100% with the first reply.
I won`t sign it, for one and the same reasons.
Grow up and blend the real world!!!
No I won't sign it any, after what I have see it's no wonder absent parents won't contribute. There are two sides to every story.
More Questions and Answers:
[2289] - [1939] - [817] - [241] - [1223] - [218] - [124] - [1016] - [2138] - [779] - [563] - [911] - [1083] - [876] - [509] - [1745] - [1604] - [454] - [156] - [1455]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: