Law Questions and Answers

Back in the untimely 60's my father belonged to a vocal group, Terry And The Tunisians. I not long came across a

British compact disc which has one of the songs on it as in good health as a British Movie which has two of the songs surrounded by it. Do I, as the surviving heir and/or the surviving member of the group have any official recourse?
Answers: Depends on who owns the rights to their work. Generally the publisher owns the rights, and, if they were a up to date band at the time, the belt members get nothing or subsequent to nothing from it, contained by terms of royalties and control of the music. If your father be listed as a writer of the songs within question, after there should be royalties coming.
Contact this company:
CMG Worldwide, Inc.
http://www.cmgworldwide.com

They represent celebrity and heirs of celebrity in right of publicity, copyyright, trademark, domain name, and other intellectual property rights.
I do believe you would have some court recourse, but only if the belt trademarked or copywrote the songs. If your father wrote the songs he would of had to copywrite them I do believe to enjoy any legal write to them. If not a soul "claimed" the written song then its up for grab. If the band be established and trademarked and the songs were copywrote I would so peruse adjectives legal writes to it.

What's the possibliities?

What are the penalties within the state of Virginia for getting arrested for blowing a .14? This is my first time getting a DUi, and I will never get one again! I be sunt to jail for two days tolerate out on $1,000 bond back surrounded by October 2007. I was massively cooperative with the police officer he even said. I did not argue. Also what do you regard could happen tomorrow to me?
Answers: If you are over 21 and convicted for a first DUI offense surrounded by Virginia, there is a MANDATORY fine of $500 or more. In optional extra, your driver's license will be revoked for a year.

Virginia has a Zero Tolerance directive for drivers under 21 years old-fashioned. Anyone under 21 caught driving near as little as a 0.02% blood alcohol concentration CAN face a $500 fine, a six-month license suspension, and penal complex time. Those under 21 who drive beneath the influence of drugs or with a BAC of 0.08% or greater are subject to one and the same penalties as those over 21, planned above.

For more details click on the link, below, which will hold you to the official DMV pattern site.

Best of luck!

Why is prostitution illegal however its legal to do porn?

I don't see a big distinction..
Answers: The reasoning of the lawmaker has to do near a communities eposure. Places that sell porn can be required to do business merely in a unmistaken section of town. Some places don't allow porn to be sold at adjectives, but you wouldn't be prosecuted for possesionof porn as long as it didn't show under age participant.So basically, porn wouldn't be around if the community didn't want it to be. Prostitution is more difficult to control as anyone who needed to could go into bar,hotels, and even on the street. You could offer your boss a roll within the hay for a c-note. Here, you have to concordat with the afternoon to day presence of the prostitute. The porn star is no longer around once the movie is made. The sheer numbers differance is also signifigant. For ten thousand race to watch a porno, you would requirement about 40 individuals to work about 4000 hours. For ten thousand citizens to have sex near a prostitute, you would need 2500 ancestors to work 4 hours. Prostitution is more labor intensive, which brings a higher risk of desease, drug trafficing, and possible intimidation.All of those people making great money near limited training and background is going to affect the economy. Why would you want to work at Macys for $10 hour when you could generate $150 and hour and not worry in the region of whether or not your tatoos showed. So in a community that allows prostitution, the financial norms are differant. The cause why there have been such an monetary boom in Nevada is because so tons people own made so much money in the sex trade. All of California and rest of the country own come to Nevada for legalized sex. The money, then go into the economy thru resturants, stores, and concrete estate etc.
I do. It's not a moral distinction.
The distinction is in the effects of the two goings-on. Prostitution often brings near it crime, abuse and drug use.
Though I do see some merit surrounded by legalizing prostitution.
Once you work out this, many other things will become clear also.

The foundation porn is legal and prostitiution isn't is simple. Because the empire making the laws resembling porn.
The only difference between the two is that respectively participant gets compensated in porn.

There are places contained by Nevada where prostitution is decriminalized.
It is because "PORN" is still considered an "art" and "acting" by "actors" and not sexual deviant conduct, as is prostitution.

On the otherhand, prostitution is still a sex act for money surrounded by most states and countries (except a certain county surrounded by Nevada and all of Amsterdam).
Excellent sound out! I never thought about it close to that before.

Both are rewarded sexual acts, so near is no difference there.

I saw one response that said prostitution brings beside it crime. Well, so does the porn industry. You have underage girls (that's statutory rape), drugs, disease, terror campaign and sometimes murder in both the porn industry and prostitution. So in that is no difference there any.

I don't think any one should be legal.
This is something which baffle me as well. The illegality of prostitution stems from a range of things. Towns and cities argue that prostitution is amoral, and has the potential to "corrupt" youth and deteriorate neighborhoods by first performance the doors for more serious crimes to be committed (drugs, gangs etc...).

Pornography is *supposed* to simply be distributed to adults (though obviously kids hold been getting their hand on it pretty much since they've been making it) and is *supposed* to be safekeeping regulated.

In reality, it probably doesn't hurt (as Tim said) that politicians approaching porn way more than prostitution, and also that the command is able to collect taxes on pornography, which would be difficult to do next to prostitution.

Sex tapes: So a entity can secretly video you having sex, and NOt be charged next to a crime?

Per the police in the Vivica Fox situation:
Atlanta police spokesman James Polite told Rush & Malloy: "At this time, we own no formal complaint from Miss Fox."
"If it was something that be consensual, we're not looking at a crime, per se," Polite added. "If the [boyfriend] is trying to extort Miss Fox, that's when we begin to look at a criminal feature."
Answers: please forward said tape for uh. . . review. yeah, that's right review, and i will ascertain the authenticity later, nearly 2 mins. later.
It depends on the law where you live, and they oscillate greatly, depending upon where a creature resides.

In many cases, the law have not have a chance to pick up up the techonolgy and there are really no authentic laws on paperwork for an "offender" to be prosecuted with, unless near has be a prior case contained by the same state in relation to the matter.
Young women, PLEASE devise first before letting someone show you having sex, or doing anything you wouldn't want the world to see. PLEASE, you don't know how down the splash sometime, possibly after you are married and have children, or find involved with church, or become a don, those tapes can come put a bet on to haunt you, BIG TIME!!!!

Should I take my cell phone near me to court or not?

I have court tomorrow and is taking a taxicab, can I bring my cell phone into the court room and place it on silent so afterwards I can call the hackney cab to come and pick me up? Or what do I do? what is the best solution. Not sure if i'll go to put in prison, but I have be to jail when I get my DUI (I was arrested), I be in within for 2 days back within October. I blew a .14. I jsut need some suggestions.
Answers: Can you not a moment ago turn the power off while you are within the court room? I would think that would be the safest process to go. I wouldn't be off it on silent just within case.
Chances are, if you bring your cell phone you will not be allowed to bring it in beside you. Take money, so you can ask to use a pay phone to ring the cab to pick you up.

EDIT: to adjectives who are speaking above, I don't believe you have be to court since 9-11. They are not allowing cell phones in various of the court buildings unless you are a lawyer. You run the risk of loosing your phone if you pilfer it with you. Seriously. I own been to court several times just to spectacle other court cases and all that I hold been to just now do NOT allow cell phones inside. I take mine and evacuate it in the motor but if you don't have a vehicle, I believe they can confiscate it if you choose to go within.
They will probably take it away when you enter the court room.
They will hang on to it on the side for you.
shame on you driving while drunk.
Sorry, but you told us.
You could have kill some innocent people.
Well for starters, stop drinking and driving.

As to the cell phone contained by court, if you do take it, you better be sure to enjoy it turned off. Having it ring surrounded by the middle of either your own sessions or any others is a sure passageway to upset the judge. If it's allowed I believe depends on the courthouse. When you arrive look around, if your not suppose to enjoy it, there should be a place you can check it surrounded by (like you would your coat) so that once your appointments is over you can pick it back up.
You can run it with you. At the courts here they clutch phones away from you and you pick them up when you're done. They do this with camera phones singular.

You should be okay. If they don't take it away from you at the entrance afterwards turn it off completely up to that time you enter the court room.

Cheers and good luck.
Take it next to you and just turn it past its sell-by date while you are in court. If you inevitability to call a black cab, you can turn it on and call one after the court proceedings. If you conclusion up having to progress to jail, it will only just go into the envelope next to the other belongings you have to foot over.

Don't have it on and on silent while contained by the courtroom. Where I live, you aren't allowed to have your phone on while within an actual courtroom. I don't know what their reasoning is behind that, but you are solitary allowed to turn them on in the hallway or lobby area. So a short time ago have it next to you, but turned off until you obligation to use it.

Good luck--I am pretty sure you know this already, but it's not a great idea to drink and drive. Please look out ;)
Depending on where you live, if you are put within jail, it could find its track to being "not within inventory"...better to take convert and call the minicab from a payphone if it is very expensive or your phone plan does not include a lost or diluted phone contingency.

Last time I had anyone recount me, local calls be 50 cents, and even not to far long-distance phone calls be $1.00 and if you are in secure unit, you have to appointment collect anyway.

It depends on what State that you reside in, but unless you own a prior record, frequent States recommend "treatment" and "rehabilitation" in the form of 6-9 months of intensive, extensive "therapy" at $20+ more per session at 3 times a week for 6 mos and attending AA 3 times a week.
Just turn it stale. If you go to reformatory they'll do a property receipt and distribute it back to you when you're out.

Tomorrow you'll probably a short time ago get a fine and a suspended license, you'll be within about an hour and out the door.
You might travel to jail for driving drunk, but your concern is whether or not to bring your cell phone to court.

My suggestion to you is that you have another look at your priorities.
Take it but turn it off (do not place it on silent... a short time ago turn it off).

If you go to top-security prison your cell phone will be stored with your personal belongings until your release.

Best bet at this point is to never, ever drive an automobile when you've be drinking within the previous 24 hours.

Is it true in Indiana that you can bring back out of paying for a dependent’s medical care by praying for him/her?

My 4 year antiquated has be in and out of the hospital so we are up to or eyes within medical bills. I heard on tv nearly strange laws surrounded by Indiana and the one that says medical bills will be dropped as long as someone prayed for the dependant while contained by the hospital. Does anyone know how I would find out more about this or if it would even be possible? I know here are a lot of really strange law out there but if it's a canon no matter how prehistoric it would stand up right??? --Thanks in credit
Answers: Yea, that seems totally crazy. I wouldn't guard on a weird canon like that even if it be true.

However, there are seriously of organizations and foundations out in attendance to help sick children and their family. Talk to the social services office within the hospital or start researching foundations for the type of condition that your child has, and see if nearby is help. You should also speak to your pastor at your church (or to a pastor if you don't have one) almost maybe taking a collection for your line or something.
I'm sure there is plenty of money out nearby, and plenty of people who want to comfort you.
Sorry, that's a bit unbelievable.

You can speak next to the hospital and file adversity to get bills reduced if you cannot wages.
Good try, but no.

However, it may be worth your while to contact a social worker at Riley's Childrens Hosptial in Indianapolis or the nearest Shriner's bureau, as both may be able to oblige you find assistance with medical exactness (sometimes based on insurance and income).

Psychology? to become an criminal lawyer?

do you own to take a Psychology class to be a criminal attorney. is it required? what classes do you have to appropriate to become a criminal lawyer. and what is Psychology? experienced inhabitants and recommended answers would be nice.
Answers: There aren't any required classes to become a criminal lawyer. All that is to say required is an undergraduate degree (any point of your choice), a law point from an accredited directive school and entry to the bar of the state within which you wish to practice. A psychology class probably wouldn't hurt. I took one surrounded by undergraduate just to spawn myself familiar near basic mental disorders. However, it is no problem not necessary since you will own access to mental health experts to assist you contained by your criminal cases. My recommendation for anyone wanting to step to law academy is to get your undergraduate level in one of the humanities (e.g., English or Philosophy) mostly because that type of study will prepare you for the type of study you will gather round in directive school. After imperative school, if you want to be a criminal defense attorney, I would recommend man a public defender for at smallest a couple years for experience before going out contained by private practice. If you want to be a prosecutor, just apply at the prosecutor's department. In law college, I would take some trial advocacy courses to sustain prepare you for what you will meet surrounded by the court room. Criminal law and criminal procedure classes are across the world required courses in canon school.
Yes, you want to know lots of psychology. Criminal, adolescent, deviant...etc...ou'll need to comprehend where these criminals are 'coming from' so you can advocate them according to the law.

How can we fight the corruption of the RIAA?

I don't download music because I believe the artists deserve compensation for their work, however I hold a big problem with the RIAA bringing so lots lawsuits against American citizens.

While sharing music online might not be the best thing to do, I believe the RIAA is a thousand times worse because it destroys family and ruins lives. I could see charging someone a small fine for sharing music (like the price of the music). But suing a 12 year old girl's own flesh and blood for millions of dollars because she was sharing music online is simply ridiculous.

They sue first and ask question later. They are using dread to manipulate and control empire. This should not be allowed to happen within America.

Unfortunately the RIAA is a very well-to-do organization that can use it's considerable resources to muster up a large amount of political support. Therefore file-sharing is illegal because they vote it's illegal. Not because it's morally wrong, but because it further's the RIAA's agenda.
Answers: Heres an answer from a struggling musician

F'k the RIAA and the Music Industry as a complete. Its all base on greed, not ethics.

There not the ones losing money, WE ARE!

See, what associates dont understand roughly speaking "copyrighted material" (as far as music) goes is that its ALREADY be stolen by the RIAA. See when a musician signs a contract with a chief label it usually stated that adjectives music produced by the artist becomes property of the sticky label, which did nothing within the creation of the actual music but provide a place to record it. Many empire try other means to go and get the music out, but the music industry is so monopulitive (is that word?) that they brained wash into thinking those venue you can see or hear music HAS to be provided by them.
Question 1. Is it illegal to download copyrighted bits and pieces? The answer is yes. So why shouldn't the RIAA be going after copyright infringers? People know the prices for thier actions. They should be punished to the full extent of the ruling.

The 12 year old know it is illegal to download copyrighted substance. The parents should be supervising thier internet usage. So if they break the rules, a punishment must be given out. This isn't a impossible thing.

Moral? Don't use P2P networks and the RIAA will not sue you. Very simple.
"Unfortunately the RIAA is a markedly wealthy bureau that can use it's considerable resources to muster up a great deal of political support. Therefore file-sharing is wrong because they say it's dishonest. Not because it's morally wrong, but because it further's the RIAA's agenda."

Copyright laws existed long earlier the RIAA. They were not created because of that group's political support. File sharing is not permitted because it is morally wrong.
Is the RIAA corrupt? Not any more than any other large tidiness. How we fight them and stop the lawsuits? Stop illegitimately downloading copywritted material.

The bigger problem (as I see it) is that the up and coming contemporaries is expecting to get everything hand to them. They don't want to work for anything, and they want everything to be free.

And, suing the parents of the 12 year old that sharing music is a moment ago fine. The parents are the ones who are responsible for what their kids do online. They are the ones that should be monitoring their kids online activities.
You are so right! It is a corrupt association. But I don't know what we can do about it. Other than not buying CDs.

Can your spouse sue you in Small Claims court while you are still married?

Answers: No. Since you are in concert and severally liable for all debts, you would be suing yourself. However, you can use other coercive technique to recover money.
no

Can an 18 year old initiate a bank article without parental consent?

Answers: Yes- you are very soon an adult, your parents justifiably have no more control over you.
Yes
:-)
Yep and you can go and get ATM/Debit card
Yeah. Of course you can!
=]
yes of course. in recent times go to the guard account and make a contribution all ur information. you don't have need of a parent to get a guard account or credit card. don't verbs.
yes u can-- ofcourse. u gotta open one sometime surrounded by your life.
yes
yes
Heck Yes..Gosh!!!
haha
Yes.
If you're eighteen you don't involve parental consent on anything...
yes at 18 you can do anything but drink
Yeah
ur considered an adult so u can do w/e.
yes, you're an full-grown.
ya im pretty sure because when you hit the age of 18 your practically an adult.i open up my own bank commentary without parental consent and i be 16 but i had to close it...to much stuff anyone charged when i had no money...but yes its possible..
A 2 year ancient could.
yes once you have some form of self, some banks ask for picture self which you can get from your local police station (age card) and they might for something next to proof of your address on it like some sort of bill or passport or driving license
yes! you are classified as a immature adult. if you still surrounded by school ask your principal to write you a memorandum to take to the guard. you need a memo from your institude and a your Identity Document and a certain amount to out of harm`s way your bank tale.
Once you turn 18, you can do whatever you primarily want without your parents. I am 20 yrs. hoary and I do what I want. I still talk to my parents for the guidance, I may or may not take it. But most of the time they are right more or less it. I've been out on my own, moved within with my boyfriend(now husband) something like 3 months after I turned 18. My brother-in-law and his girlfriend got an apartment. He be 18, and she wasn't even 18 yet...
Yes, logically. I don't know the minimum age, though, or if it depends on the bank. But at 18 you are competent to open an explanation without parental consent.

More Questions and Answers:
[447] - [2214] - [502] - [2365] - [1641] - [533] - [2092] - [401] - [1514] - [122] - [384] - [1927] - [2361] - [1445] - [787] - [1440] - [208] - [1631] - [11] - [1077]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: