Law Questions and Answers

MSNBC Who? Wasn't that one of those great propaganda channels close to Tokyo Rosie O'Donnell and the Piew?

Answers: MSNBC can go belly up as far as I'm concerned, it's biased crap simply like the Piew.

Fox report rocks.
Yeah its as fair and perched as Faux News.

Edit. Faux means misrepresent. Look it up some time!!

Foxx was the President of Mexico.

When you break up congress ratings you will clearly see that its the Rep side that brings the rating down!!

Do a moment or two objective reading some time!

Wow!!!! You own all of your Faux News discussion points all messed up together!!!
Take rotten the tinfoil hat, turn rotten Fox News and talk radio, and travel take a meander outside. The fresh air will do you flawless.

What happens to your vehicle if it be used in a drug sting?

What happen to your vehicle if it was used contained by a drug sting? Would the police seize it even if you be only purchasing marijuana (which is a misdemeanor crime)?

Also what would crop up to your vehicle if you've had drugs inside your vehicle (even if it be only for personal use)?

Also what if your vehicle wasn't completely remunerated for?
Answers: Not only will you lose your vehicle, you could also be charged as an supplement if you loaned your car to the character caught in the drug sting.

The police could produce evidence proving you know the person you loaned your vehicle to be a drug dealer or drug runner.

Then not merely would you lose your vehicle, you would lose your freedom as well.
Its gone and if you haven't finished paying for it you go and get to pay for one that you don't even own anymore.

Con Prostitution ?

Please help me find reason why prostitution should NOT be legalize.
I'm have a debate in class for this.
ALSOOOOOOOO

Should Surveillance Camera be installed adjectives over United States for Protection?

I'm Con on this too.

Please give me some information. :)
Answers: Surveillance cameras would begin a whole sack of worms, since people would be in motion after it about the right to privacy and worries of a "Big Brother" environment.

As for prostitution, the debate is tough since it's the "oldest profession." I'm sure some responses here will administer you some good planning. But pro arguments would probably say it would abet reduce disease and pedophilia by have federally enforced regulations. (I am NOT pro, just playing devil's advocate).
Pros - associates that can't get any so they enjoy to pay for it.
Cons - individuals that get it 4 free!

What do u think of the twic program?

it's a topical program from homeland security where on earth all transportation workers enjoy to register for a id card to be precise susposed to be used. it is an extensive background check and the self card cost about 132.50.
Answers: As a merchant oceanic captain, I consistency the whole TWIT (TWIC) program is lately another layer of establishment bull to take more money from the workers and invade on the individuals privacy. It will do nought, that already in place ID. doesn't already do. It will just creat another layer of buerocacy, and abundantly of extra trouble for already overloaded workers.
With the level of license I hold, it costs me nearly $5,000 every five years to maintain my license valid, and current. Everyone of these ill conceived extras in recent times keeps accumulation to the costs, and there seem to be no end surrounded by sight of continuing, and second requirements.
I already have have to go through an extensive perspective check. A criminal record check. I hold to keep a passport current. I enjoy to keep a minimum of three, valid, establishment issued ID's
The US gooberment (intentional mis-spelling) seems to deem that the citizens of this country are an unlimited source of income for them. I can only enunciate, enough is ample!

Thankfully, I have solitary three more years before I can retire. Had I not be barraged near a never ending stream of hot regulations, and costs, I would have worked at least possible another 10 years. Older captains are going away the field within droves. They are not being replaced anywhere implicit as fast as they are disappearing. I hear it said daily, "I've have enough of this crap."

Thanks to the USA's nouns to keep their foot on everyones collar, and get as reflective in your pocket as they can, decades of experience are going away the industry. Now, you're getting green kids straight out of the academy with little, or no, actual experience, pushing those millions of gallons of gasoline and toxic chemicals past your neighborhood.
i think it worth it

Does a good LAWYER make the difference between LIFE and DEATH?

Meaning that a wealthy party can "walk away free" and an run of the mill citizen is "doomed from the beggining of the trial"?
Answers: Not always, but money without a doubt helps. And it's not simply the lawyer, but the staff approval him/her. For example, if you were charged near a crime and some sort of non-DNA physical evidence were involved, the prosecution is going to enjoy their forensics team present their interpretation of that evidence. If you enjoy the money to hire a private attorney, that attorney may in turn hire an expert witness, someone within the forensics field, to provide an interpretation of the evidence explicitly more favorable to you, or present an opinion that the evidence be handled tactlessly and could therefore be call into question. Such an attorney might also hire a private investigator who may hope additional evidence or other witnesses to the crime who dispute the story that you were the perpetrator.

Contrast that beside someone who relies on a public defender. That attorney does not enjoy the above mentioned resources and probably has more cases than he/she have time for. Unless the case against you is really undersized or you have a witness who can establish you be elsewhere at the time the crime occurred, the public supporter may suggest that you plead guilty to a lesser charge to avoid a trial and a longer sentence.

So beside money, you have a much better fate of establishing reasonable doubt within the minds of the jurors than you do with a public ally. You're not necessarily "doomed from the beginning of the trial" if you don't own money, but money sure helps.
Yes, and this is one of the cause of extremism / terrorism to grow.

If you threaten to sue someone, can their lawyer hail as you to settle?

a friend of mine lost somthing value (over 7 thousand dollars). She said she would work towards paying it sour, but havent heard from her contained by weeks (she lives out of state in fl). I wrote her a notification asking her some concrtete details about when she would be making payments( I never threatened to sue) give or take a few 2 weeks ago. Today, a lawyers gone a message on my voicemail from her city. What could this be
Answers: Never trust a lawyer i.e. not on your side!
What did the message say?
Why would she hold gotten a lawyer?
yeah. they can
he could be calling to settle or more than feasible to say "Leave my client alone or WE'LL be suing you".
Yes, they can hail as you and offer a settlement. Don't rob the first offer...the other go low on the first proposition.
Maybe she is suing you and saying that you are maxim that she lost something that she claims she didn't. She is not offering you a settlement that is for sure
Yes they can. But beckon the lawyer rear legs and see what the want for sure. If you dont like what they hold to say or be aware of uncomfortable, you notify that lawyer that you will bring back to them after consulting yours. Whether you enjoy one or not.
Maybe she just looked-for to be sure that you could never bother her again by saying that she did foot the bill. The only style to make it public servant is to talk to a attorney.
She is suing you? Or are you suing her? The information you give in the region of you question is a bit confusing. The best point for you to do is to call the advocate that left you the message and find out what it is more or less.
Most lawyers, will not lately ''call' you...don't get too worried, and don't respond...If you have first gotten a lawyer, and I recommend that you very soon go that route if you and her can't see eye to eye on things, and consent to him/her do the negotiating from immediately on.. I don't know what your friend 'lost',...but this is a matter specifically best answered in court. Do not respond to any one who claims to be an attorney...they usually write you first, beside an official notification head, and consequently advise you to telephone...
When someone threatened to sue me, I hired a lawyer and found out that the singular person that have a valid argument in court be my wife and I. We had our attorney contact their attorney and he told them to drop everything or obverse a lawsuit that would really sting. They did!!

The best way is to ring the number and find out.
An offer to settle the issue? Probably not; he probably call to tell you to stop harassing his client.

As long as you don't transport him notice that you are one represented, then he can phone call you up personally.

Call the attorney up and find out the measure. Be wary that he may be record your conversation.

Good luck!
Did you threaten her in the message? Sounds kinda weird that a Lawyer call you.

If I was you...
merely file a complaint surrounded by small claims court.

I would not talk to that Lawyer, rebuke his calls. If he requirements to deal beside you...
he should do it in writing. What the hell is he doing calling you anyway? First of adjectives, you are in the RIGHT!

This is why associates SHOULD NEVER LOAN OUT MONEY TO FRIENDS/FAMILY! If they don't pay...
it damages the relationship. The relationship is more exalted to me, so I WILL ALWAYS SAY NO when friends and fam ask me to borrow money!
What does the voice mail articulate?

Perhaps - then- One CAN respond..
Sure.

But if she's having a legal representative call you I'm pretty sure the romance is over.
Call them wager on and find out.

Don't be afraid of lawyers. I'm contained by law arts school and there are a bunch of bozos within, trust me. If she has retained a legal representative (HIGHLY unlikely-- I mean, lawyer want to get salaried. There would be no reason to reimburse a lawyer unless you're getting sued or trying to sue someone.), it's probably something to do beside asking you to stop contacting her-- like hounding or something. There's only so much you can do towards trying to collect a debt. The statute is very specific nearly that. You may be forced to stop contacting her, in which covering it seems similar to you'll have to filch her to court.

Keep in mind, she'll simply be responsible for the fair bazaar value of anything she lost. It's called "conversion," for when you speak to the legal representative. Tell the lawyer this individual converted your chattel (pronounced "chat-tul," not "shatel") and you are entitled to a forced sale immediately and if she won't pony up, will you be seeing him in court?
Are you sure it's a attorney? Most likely it is a advocate, or someone pretending to be a lawyer, wanting you to stop bothering the personage in Florida. Make a appointment. It won't hurt to find out what's up, but don't expect a settlement offer.

Google the handset number. If it's from an attorney, it should be from a land column in the organization? Google will tell you whose number it is. Before discussion to the lawyer, ask the "lawyer" for his/her describe, business address, business telephone, and Florida Bar Association number. The stick association number, must by law, be furnished when asked.

Listen to any proposal, but you can say you want to have a chat it over with your attorney. If he threatens you, droop up.
Yes, but if your friend has a legal representative the lawyer offering the settlement should consult your attorney first. A settlement can be beneficial.

Your friend may not verbs all of their losses, but to a abiding extent a settlement is a form of admitting guilt. Depending on the make-up of the lawsuit, your friend may want to take it to court, but at duplicate time if it's a big enough settlement, your friend can nick the money. There is always a casual the jury may not side in your favor, it's a calculated risk, Its resembling poker, you have to know when you can bluff successfully.
lol, she doesn't owe you anything because you hold no proof. She probably went to a legal representative to make sure that she wasn't liable. If in attendance was no prior written agreement, later its considered a gift especially if you two have a relationship.

The lawyer calling be probably to tell you she doesn't owe you anything.
Make sure you NEVER EVER EVER threaten to sue or steal legal endeavour against someone. You can DO it, not threaten it.

Its fine to write a letter asking for concrete details going on for how she intends to repay you as long as everything was politely worded, as if your attorney had written it, not

You better damn all right tell me when you plan to pay cheque me back *****!!

You can bring to a close your letter beside something like , If you should come to nothing to provide the requested payment details, or verbs repayment no later than such and such a date, I may be required to cart whatever dealing is deemed vital to recover the amounts owing to me.

Sincerely,


not sure what the attorney could want. Typically lawyers
distribute notices contained by writing, they don't call ancestors. Like poppidad says, find out who this attorney is, and make sure he IS a attorney in the comportment he advised. No issue who you are speaking to, stay Calm.
sure...or they could be telling you to stop harassing her in the region of the debt and tell you she is going to directory BK to stop the harassment.

What are the following types of damages?

Consequential
Special
Punitive
Treble
actual

I am filing a covering against a collection agency for fraud, and want to have some concept of what these types of damages are my attorney mentioned.

She explained them, but not in a carriage that made any sense.
Answers: Consequential damages come from the direct and natural result of the appointments of the defendant

Special damages are those created under convinced statutes (like for fraud or violation of consumer protection acts)

Punitive damages are designed to punish the defendant so they will not resume a reliable action (like the McD's coffee case).

Treble damages are similar to consequential damages (a variation); most states will mark out them as the same.

Actual damages are only just that, the money or loss (in money) that you sustained.
Consequential: damages that usually follow the bad act by the defendant.
Special: Damages which are special to this plaintiff, caused by the impossible acts of the defendant.
Punitive: Damages which the jury may award, due to fraud or other outrageous conduct. The standard of evidence is clear and convincing evidence.
Treble: Three times damages.
actual: Actual damages suffered, i.e. loss of wages, loss of property, et al

What is the difference between detrimental reliance and Promissory estoppal?

Thank you
Answers: Detrimental reliance is an aspect of promissory estoppel. For example, in command to make a skin for recovery beneath the theory of promissory estoppel, the claimant customarily has to prove:
a) There be a promise

b) There was satisfactory reliance on that promise that put the claimant in a position of detriment, or detrimental reliance.
Detrimental reliance- a promise which the promisor should justifiably expect to induce action or forbearance of a unconditional and substantial character on the chunk of the promisee and which does induce such action or forbearance is binding if injustice can be avoided solitary by enforcement of the promise. Restatement (Second) removed the requirement that the detriment be "substantial".

Promissory estoppel - the doctrine of promissory estoppel prevents one party from withdrawing a promise made to a second event if the latter has logically relied on that promise and acted upon it.

Waterboarding isn't Torture? A Duck isn't a Duck?

The Far Right Wing Would Like you to Think There is Some Debate About this, There isn't.
Answers: The "Intelligence"community would lead us adjectives to believe that waterboarding is actually a form of swimming module. You can now grasp you Red Cross Waterboarding badge. In rider to the waterboarding badge, you can also win the insurgent pyramid badge, the mullah humiliation decoration, and the civilian removal badge. The rookie cop deterrent pendant with oak branch clusters is being considered. One of the most utile phrases contained by the English language is,"Don't piss on my leg and transmit me it's raining." It is the title of Judge Judy's auto biography. George W. Bush 's will be entitled,"Even I don't believe a single word I say."
so call "waterboarding", while an effective interrogation tactic is noticeably not "torture".
A recent approach to interrogations has be to use techniques such as waterboarding, sexual humiliation and sexual name-calling, and dogs to intimidate or pressure prisoners in a behaviour held to be legal lower than national or international law.

The Geneva Accords does not enter into this because they one and only apply to members of a COUNTRY which have signed the accords and who are member of that country's military.
who cares if it is torture or not. It is powerful. These radicals want to waste us. they want to kill you and me. they would cut our children's throats within front of us and post it on line for fun. they are evil evil population. It worked and prevented a dozen terrorist attacks. Don't be an idiot.

Help with form and welfare please!!?

hi, i live in idaho. i be separated from my husband, and during that time i became pregnant. latter he did letme come back and live within ourhome, but not as husband an wife, i filed for assistance, and they give it to me, i did not lie on my application. after the toddler was born i find a call from a welfare investigater, asking me if i lived beside my husband, i said yes i do, but i live in a separate quantity of house., he told me he did believe me, i didnt hear anything from him till a year later. i finally found perfect job at a hospital, oh and also i go off assisitance after the babe was born. sooner or later i was working and a man comes up and say hi michelle, ive decided that we can in recent times forget all of this, and not travel to court all you own to do is pay subsidise half, of the 12,000.. my coworkers and boss be there, i be embarassed, and hurried and sined the paper to acquire him out of there. very well i couldnt make the return they turned it over to collection,now im man garnished, i canr breed it .help
Answers: I guess you already know you should not sign an critical document like that lacking conferring with an attorney. You should contact them, update them you signed because the man intimidated you in front of your co-workers and boss. You should explain that you never lied on your application. You hold the right to appeal decisions such as this and that should own been your first step. Make it your subsequent step. Don't let them browbeat you, come to blows it. You will not have to clear if you can prove your case.
Refuse the giving and state that you were freshly forced to sign the document because of the situation at that time.

More Questions and Answers:
[667] - [2316] - [1652] - [2547] - [2113] - [2309] - [4] - [1195] - [1962] - [476] - [2178] - [1737] - [2215] - [1536] - [2410] - [125] - [198] - [132] - [2108] - [66]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: