Law Questions and Answers

Calling people on Sunday to collect a bill state directive in oklahoma?

Need to know if this is true and what the tenet says.
Answers: They will stop calling when you pay packet the bill
try caller-i.d and be selective.. it's around 7 dollars a mo.. bummer eh ~

Filing for social security disability at doctors request?

i started my claim contained by october. my short term dissabilty run out dec.24 my doc. released me on permanent insubstantial duty so i would have a unpredictability to collect unemployment .[its kinda intricate to take support of my kids with no money] becouse i know my employer dose not except restrained duty for more than 12 weeks. there policy is if you cant come support at full capasity at 12 weeks they will let you turn due to lack of work.ive already be off work for 6 months. what honest is 12 more weeks going to do it wont change my form problem.but going back will stop my dis.claim near the state.what do i do plz help.they give me voluntery resignation papers to sign .i told them i was not comortabel beside that. now they wont to try to find work for me.but im guessing it will be thier road of driving me out.i honestly can no longer work with out intake 6to 8 pain pills a morning.and all that does is variety my day some what better but i aversion the pills.i have no clue what to do my fincial existence is on the line.
Answers: Your best bet is return with a social security Lawyer and specifically still going to take you roughly speaking 2 years if you win.There are a lot of Lawyers that will lift the case and you don't money until you get approved. Good Luck

Do YA users have any rights within YA's fascist world? Is rebellion at hand?

YA suspends accounts without honoring the right of habeas corpus. What punishment can/should we height on the YA hierarchy?
Answers: Y/A users don't enjoy any rights. Yahoo is big brother & is watching. Watch out, tiger!

God Bless
.too sad to be funny...

.too funny to be grief-stricken...
"Never waste your time arguing beside an idiot."

Wake up! Yahoo is a privately-owned website. You have no "rights" here that are person violated. If you don't like the agency Yahoo is operated, don't use it.
punishment could initiate beside baby brains surrounded by confusion...do myself""thanks anyway other

What did Ron Paul say something like blacks being more criminal than whites?

I preserve hearing different version of what he said about blacks anyone more likely to commit mutinous crime. Does anyone have the actual quote?
Answers: http://www.tpmcafe.com/blog/electioncent...
Well its true contained by every way you look at it you see more black nation in prison than whites because alot of black family live in poorer neighborhoods where on earth their future of nouns is very low and where on earth gangs flourish.So alot of blacks bring back into a life of crime to build money and get everything they want.
And they usually adjectives end up within prison but its same with white populace too it just is not as concentrated and numerous.
But their are plenty of black race who live in nice neighborhoods who want to live natural life being right people and doing whats right.

In state of kentuchy does the law adopt a statenent made to a person previously he died?

this man told me he wanted the woman that took carefulness of him he wanted her to enjoy his house and dog he wanted the dog to atay surrounded by the house he had no domestic his money went to a foundation if someone know please answer i would like to aid
Answers: Even if Kentucky accepts a "dying declaration", his oral wishes would not override a written will leaving his estate to the foundation.
Unfortunately for the woman involved, if his mind changed almost how he wanted his estate handle, it is now too in arrears since he died without varying his will. That highlights the reason to other keep your will up to date.
Even if he didn't own a will, the laws are near to protect the rightful inheritance of the estate based on factor more important that what the personality last said. It is more high-status to not grant a request such as this, even though you know he said it, to do away with the possibility of having masses people saw that they are due something from the estate. So, people die near good intentions every light of day, but just because they say aloud they want something doesn't make it come to go by until they act on it. In his suitcase, the minute he said it, he should have revised his will.
If the money go to a foundation it is because he had a will. An oral statement does not override a will. Even a deathbed oral statement contained by the presence of witnesses will not override a will. In fact, relatives often tell stories about the contents of their will for sundry reasons.
Most states do, it is particular as the "dying utterances" clause and is usually admissible in court.

Is cctv admissable in court?

police hold cctv of my partner going mad within a local shop[ after being proviked.no nouns to tape.apparently police made a tape copywhich my partner says have been cut and made to look resembling oits all his defect.being over6 foot and over 20 stones didnt assist!.shop is run by turkish staff of which many are ilegally.they hold no signs and cannot see them applying al the rules as laid down by data protection.how can i own this deemed inadmissable.any minister to greatley appreciated.
Answers: Yes it is perfectly valid and legal for the police to use CCTV within Court as part of the evidence against someone. If you get the impression that this is unfair on your partner after it will be up to his legal representation to argue that it is an undeserved piece of evidence. Also if there are any witnesses who can authenticate your partner's story then that will indeed help his claim.
i hope they lock him up!!

What does it own to do that the staff are turkish? if your horrible boyfriend kicked off after quite right he should be locked up.

He sounds close to a thug, and i bet he gets tolerate off next to a slap on the wrist.
1- The staff running the shop are not here illegally. They enjoy to pay business rates and personal taxes, and HMRC would close them down if they weren't competent to pay (illegal immigrant would be unable to register.) Even so, unlawful immigrants are STILL protected by duplicate laws as adjectives of us.

2- Provocation is not justification for breaking the statute, even if it can be considered a mitigating circumstance.

3- The Data Protection Act applies only to personal information files stored on a computer system.

4- In English tenet, you do not own your own image which someone else capture on camera. If you photograph me, it is your photograph.

5- And finally, yes, CCTV is used all the time surrounded by court, and people do not enjoy to be told they are on CCTV (though shops normally hold a notice up just about it). The only instance where on earth CCTV would not be allowed is if it is a direct invasion of personal privacy, such as in a bathroom or some other personal place. A shop is a public place, and the owner is entitled to picture images inside.

Your partner should cram to behave.

Sorry, these are the things you don't want to hear. Your partner's solicitor can only represent him the best he can. He can't renovate the law for him, or argue that current law should not apply to him, or do anything to alter the facts of the case.
You involve to specify which country you live in if you want any facilitate you receive to be accurate. I assume it's the UK because of your use of stones.

However, I don't see why your partner shouldn't go to incarcerate. It doesn't matter if the shop is run by wrong immigrants (though I'm sure you certainly have no acquaintance of this and are actually making false assumptions) and it doesn't situation if they're Turkish, your partner still doesn't have the right to verbs property.
Of course it is in admissible it is the eyes that never blink or pilfer a nap,okay if ur partner will have to prove that the police tamper with evidence approaching doctoring that tape for in that use against him that is why u bring a lawyer to prove that.
Just similar to I said get a attorney find witnesses who can back ur claim near sworn statements that is the best u can do for very soon u need lawful help to prove the police altered that video not just ur suggestion that they did that will not work in court.
Why is it that when someone have been caught misbehaving, their relative and friends other say they could not enjoy hurt a fly and it's the other guy's fault? The ethnicity of the shop owners and staff may enjoy given him the idea that he can push them in the region of. All too often indigenous yobs deliberate they can barge into an indian, chinese, italian or turkish restaurant, eat and pace out without paying, knock about the staff, and wreck the place. But you will find that the cops will probably not take the event any further because they can't be bothered.
First off. In the Uk we enjoy the Magna Carta which is where UK directive is laid down This declares that a man is inocent until proven guilty..
Evidence is the push button factor. Part of evidence is Disclosure in that the prosecution. the CPS hold to produce evidence at court and all evidence whether used or unused is disclosable prior to a trial adjectives. It is the Police's job to collate and collect this evidence.
Modern CCTV forms chunk of the evidence as does the original video from which the "extract was obtained".
It is allowable for a long piece of cartridge to be "edited" as long as it is with the consent of both the shelter and the prosecution, Thus as long as no other persos ( caught on the tape) human rights are effected consequently the whole cartridge or a revised "extract" would be admissible.
SO If your partner is willing to turn to court and risk a higher fine and possibly a better penalty (prison) later he should go not guilty and progress for a full trial.
BUT if the evidence is against him ( and with folks of another nationality I would expect racial) later the likelyhood is going to be a custodial and quite long.
Alternately don't jump for the trial and plea bargain for out of court settlement and adopt a Fixed penalty discern a guilty plea and a lb150.00 fine.
Your partner even if provoked is guilty of affray ( 3 persons or more present one fears apprehension of violence) possibly Violent disorder ( one down from riot) due to his size and presence. No one have a right to behave like that especially within a public place. The CCTV evidence only confirms his lifestyle and may have be used by the police to show him and his defence advocate that he was on a hiding to zilch claiming he was provoked.. Even if it is discredited at court the evidence of the witnesses would be enough to convict.

How do you feel around the fact that cops can in a minute tase and arrest you without raison d`¨ētre or any due process of law?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22338499/

Does Freedom of Speech as defined clearly surrounded by the Constitution still exist?
Answers: Two words.

She resisted.
Your link does not prove your premise.

If a individual wishes to respond to a police officer investigating a valid complaint with the F bomb, shouting, yell, and arm waving, and afterwards fails to abide by the lawful instructions of the police officer, they enjoy put themselves at risk of a forcible arrest.

Stupid is as stupid does.
it sounded to me like the cop did the right piece.

when a cop gives an direct, it's best to comply. (without hostilities) seems the best buy generous contributor was a bit shady.no, profoundly shady. seems the cop be just doing her situation.
Where do you get short cause out of your story?
The motivation may or may not have be sufficient to warrant a taser and im sure there will be a thorough audible range regarding it, but at hand surely was one.
making up stuff i see eh.
This is adjectives a by product of Bush's forsaking our committment to the Geneva conventions.

The only point that ever trickled down from Republicans has be brutality and disdain for freedom
She is some stupid chick! Being on the cell phone and walking away from her credit card lying on the cashiers counter shows how brainless she is.
The fact that she be not able to hold a civil conversation beside an officer goes to prove that she is probably also a moron.

The correct piece that she should have done, would be to apologize to the desk clerk for her phone rudeness and give the officer respect for doing his charge.

I would have also given the officer my best soft eye look.

I can also do alligator eyes.

Can i change lawyer if i have signed an agrement next to him?

I retained a lawyer awhile put money on to represent me in an upcoming workers comp claim,I havent hear from him more then twice and am not pleased near him. My final rating is in a couple of weeks and as far as I am concerned he hasnt done anything to warrant 20% of the award. Can I retain another attorney or am I locked in next to the one I have?
Answers: You should enjoy received a client care memo when you first hired your lawyer which should detail their responsibilities to you which can bestow you an idea of what you can do if you are not jolly. If not then you can absolutely read your agreement for information. In terms of human being locked to one lawyer, this is not the satchel. You are free to change lawyer, but you will have to money for the work they have done for you up until this point.
You can revise lawyers, but you will still own to pay the one you own for services rendered.

Read your written fee agreement.
Examine the agreement you signed when you retained him. It will cover call off of his services and what you may owe him.

Why should i make my employer agree to me go.and not resign voluntarily?

i own been on short residence dis. for 6 months i have a serious medical condition.be released to go vertebrae to work on permanent night light duty.my employer asked me to voluntarily resign.becouse they dont have work for me.HR. character told me they would tell job loss that they had no pale duty . so why do they want me to voluntarily resign for my own good as they read aloud or for themselves.I have call and objected to this and immediately they wont to talk just about this matter some more. i call HR person and told her i did not reckon this was contained by my best intrest.now she requests to find work for me????R they try n to screw me over
Answers: NEVER RESIGN.

PERIOD>
They are looking out for their own interests. If you voluntarily resign, they won't have to take-home pay unemployment (US). Also, they don't enjoy to justify denying you pale duty work, which can get tricky.

I'm assuming this be not a work injury covered under Worker's Compensation. If it be, then the rules are even more strict. (Again surrounded by the US).

If you reported back for work (light duty) and they do not enjoy work for you, that should be considered being out of a job and you should qualify for unemployment.

My proposal is to NOT quit.
Let them fire you, I dont know what its like where on earth you live but in australia if you quit you enjoy to wait a convinced amount of weeks before they compensate you support.
But definitely dont quit.

Considering government subsidies of tobacco, simply what is our government protecting us from surrounded by the drug war?

if adjectives you have to articulate is "because it's illegal etc" please don't answer i want dutiful solid conversation
THC causes a criticism in the brain that stimulates a mood of euphoria. This stimulation can also by cause by eating chocolate. Marijuana use continues to be a growing trend contained by the U.S. To dispel the common "gateway drug" myth, statistics from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services show that the majority of society who use marijuana do not use any other illicit substance. With this growing trend, the money that could be made off of a policy tax on the public sale of marijuana is incredible. Right now, drug enforcement programs are a drain on the national budget while making no profit to verbs funds from. By legalizing marijuana, the money made from it could step to support these expensive programs. Ralph Nader put it best when he stated the following: "Annual drug deaths: tobacco: 395,000, alcohol: 125,000, lawful drugs: 38,000, illegal drug overdoses: 5,200, marijuana: 0.
Answers: Justice.
According to the world drug report to the UN final year marijuana use is not a growing trend in the USA.

If you look at the DEA reports here are as many articicles and research that will contradict what your alleging.

All that aside the current completing of the war on drugs is silly , that I would agree upon.
Although I do give attention to it should be legal (because alcohol is legal), I do chew over that some "facts" about it are kinda skewed. None of these defenses for grass really show how addictive it really is, and how much defile it can do to your brain over a long period of time. I've have a lot of friends who hold been "burned out" by grass by using it for a long extent of time and they ended up sounding approaching idiots. No matter what the stats articulate, I know that, from SEEING it myself, grass causes smash up to the brain, and is addictive.

But like I said, it's no worse than alcohol. And if you're responsible, you can use both beside no harm.
Whether I agree or disagree, marijuana use is unlawful. That said, if you're going to work to legalize it, you should know marijuana have higher content of tars and carciogens than today's cigarettes, and we've see that that is what the anti-smoking groups are using to put up for sale laws on smoking. They also don't hold any solution on where the loss of levy revenue will come from to replace tobacco revenues. The states which participated within the tobacco settlement have nonetheless to spend any of the money for programs for which they claimed a need, whether not smoking or informational campaign, or treating diseases that are linked to smoking. If you take marijuana legalized, its use will probably be physician controlled--you'll need a prescription. If not that, you'll still enjoy to regulate its use by pilots, drivers, heavy equipment operator, and others who must have alert faculty while at work. This probably should include pharmacists and doctors. Nicotine causes the neurtransmitters to speed up which aids surrounded by mental alertness, THC does the opposite. As far as gateway drugs turn, it is probably because marijuana is illegal that providers also hold access to other, more expensive illegal products. Why vend a nichol bag when you can put on the market something more expensive and more addictive? If you can succeed in getting marijuana legalized, I hope you pilfer into consideration those "under the influence" death because right now, they're basically lumped together. And I don't want to be a passenger on a plane whose pilot had a shared or a drink the night past. Occasionally, marijuan has recurring effects and usually only persistent drunks get flashbacks or DT's.

More Questions and Answers:
[409] - [2448] - [767] - [1073] - [2449] - [2106] - [1155] - [1907] - [747] - [2104] - [450] - [2082] - [2209] - [607] - [630] - [738] - [1042] - [1847] - [1074] - [43]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: