Law Questions and Answers

Who said "the U.S. patent organization is no longer needed"?

Answers: "Everything that can be invented has be invented." -- Charles H. Duell, U.S. Commissioner of Patents, in 1899.

However, the site where on earth I found this suggests it's an urban leged, that Duell never said this, or was misquoted.

http://everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=...

Just for curiosity I checked Snopes. Wasn't competent to find anything.

My son violated his probation?!? Questions!?

ok, He is 18; and had 2 felony; one for stealing and one for recieving stolen property. Totalling 9 years- but he got probation (May of this year). Unfortunatley, he did not do the things he be to do; community service, drug & alcohal treatment, payments, ect.. so he was picked up and have court January 11th. I am traumatized as he is my BIRTHSON and I am a little upset that his go was supposed to be better and i enjoy discovered otherwise- Is he likely to run to prison? Can anyone give me thier evaluation on what is likely to transpire to him? This does not look good does it? :(
Answers: Tabitha, you dont mention what state you are within, but just as a broad rule, first time offenders next to non violent crimes will be given probation. What the courts are doing is seeing if this individual can exist inwardly the boundaries of the law beneath supervision and stipulate guidelines and rules for the offender to live by. Things such as community service, repayment of restitution and staying verbs and sober are considered to be rehabilitative. I know this is incredibly difficult for you. He is your son, but you have to see this from the law's eyes. He commited at most minuscule two felony crimes that he was convicted of. Now the court give him another chance of redemption and he have unwisely decided not to follow the rules. At this point, man felony convictions, the court will more than likely be in somebody`s space the original prison sentence and incarcerate him. So to answer your thought and cross-examine,,,,NO, it does not look good at adjectives. Try to be strong in this. I know it is not natural.
Tabitha,
It is very difficult surrounded by your situation. The fact is your son chose, of his own free will, not to follow the jargon of probation. There is nothing you could hold done at his age to make things different. He made the choice, regrettably a bad one, so he will most feasible go to prison. Seems the decide gave him a material opportunity to turn his life around and he chose not to do that.
Sorry, I know this doesn't relief. Do not try to take the blame for his choices surrounded by life. You enjoy had no influence on him since he be 7 years old.
To comment on this any further would lone be kicking you while you are down.
I'm sorry.
No, it don't look good! He may hold to serve the remainder of his sentence in prison.

He has-been to follow the rules of society by committing the original crimes, later when a judge give him a break ... he messed that up too.

As parents we hope that our children's lives will be nicer and better than we remember ours were. In some cases they are ... but some children have need of to hit bottom before they acquire it together.

My daughter hung out with teens we want she hadn't, dated the "bad boys" (every one of her High School boyfriends be on probation!) and generally without being seen anything we said. I was remarkably disappointed in where on earth her life be heading.

I am very cheery to tell you that she get past this stage of her enthusiasm. She cleaned up her act valid good, and is with good cheer married with 4 kids immediately. Hopefully, once your son realizes that he is making impossible choices ... he too will come around.

Remember that when all is said and done, he must whip responsibility for his lifestyle. You can try to steer him right, but its HIS choice as to what he does.

If he does go to prison, he might come out next to a different attitude, and may decide to budge straight instead of going back.

On a deed contained by NY..what does "tenants by the entirety indicate ?"?

Answers: The above answer from Fraginal is flatly incorrect.

Tenants by the Entirety is a form of ownership only possible when the unified owners are husband and wife. A property held as "tenants by the entirety" may individual be reached by creditors of united debts of a husband and wife.

The specifics of inheritance law rise and fall by state, however, upon the death of one spouse, if the property is held contained by this form, generally the full property pass to the surviving spouse.
Tenants by entirety means adjectives the tenants occupy a property.

What happens to a home after it have been busted for growing over 200 marijuana plants?

My neighbors be just busted 2 weeks ago for growing/ cultivating pot surrounded by their home- over 200 plants. I am wondering what will happen to the home. Will they be capable of still live there, if they want to? (Not that they want to) Will they be capable of sell it tomorrow if they considered necessary too? What about renting it out? Or will it in recent times go into foreclosure? Or even hold it seized by the government? There must be some sort of guideline that the establishment follows for this type of thing. They don’t the home. In certainty they just bought it smaller number than 2 years ago. The PG&E line be cut, since they tapped into dishonestly. The people who live near have not have a trial yet, so they are still innocent of any crime, as of today. Any planning?
Answers: This happened surrounded by my community. The person didn't lose their house, but the county held the property until the IRS could audit that character to see if they had financed the home purchase near illegal income. I suppose they had to pay cheque back IRS over $100k, and after kept their home. Had they not been competent to pay, the county would own seized it.
Your neighbors sound resembling a real bunch of winner.
From what I've seen, the house will be seized and sold.(great passageway to pick up a bargain, survey your newspaper for the public sale announcement.)
"If you can't do the time, don't do the crime"- Tony Beretta

Smoke Free Law?

Do agree with the statute to make restraunts bar and other public places smoke free? Do think that it is right that casinos are exempt from this tenet?
Answers: Making restaurants and public places smoke free is the best thing we ever did. Non smokers hold just as much right as smokers and non smokers are surrounded by the majority. lf someone wants to wipe out themselves with lung cancer agree to them do it themself in private. The rest of us don't want the second appendage smoke. Now that the bowling alley is smoke free I don't own to come home and throw all my clothes, from my coat to my underwear jn the hose as soon as I get home. Casinos should be smoke free too unless you want to enjoy separate casinos for smokers. Many people similar to to gamble but don't want second foot smoke either.
OH yea! The smoke free directive has be really good for the hotel and restaurant business in my nouns!

Heck, in newly my county the employees of three bar and two truck stops have be fully protected from second hand smoke within the workplace. The bars and truck stops they worked surrounded by closed down due to lack of business!

Yep! Fully protected from second appendage smoke AND tips, and wages and health insurance! Smoke free be a great idea for them!

I wonder if the wizards who come up with this directive realized what they be actually doing?
It should be the owners outcome when it is an adult business such as bar, private clubs and casinos. An adult can variety the decision to progress to a smoking or non-smoking business. I have no problem beside it anywhere else. BTW the casinos are not exempt. They have to shift non smoking also, but I would not be surprised if this changes.

Can a group of individuals get together and folder a discrimination charge against Yahoo Questions?

For the method they act that we can't even use our freedom of speech. are the words badly behaved,dirty, and filthy reason plenty to remove peoples questions? they to be sure aren't cuss words.
Answers: Freedom of speech is a right guaranteed by the government... NOT Yahoo.

When you agree to the lingo of service, you agree to voluntarily squelch that right and agree to be monitored.

So in short, you could attain a group of people together and sue Yahoo. but you would lose.
I find you eyeshade name impolite, but I can't delete that...
Yahoo Answers isn't about charte blanche freedom of speech... freedom in need rules is anarchy. Anarchy has no court system or even-handedness...
I don't know about your question and why they were removed, but you know we adjectives have the right to flag a interview that we perceive as inappropriate. You hold that right also.
users probably give up any rights when we agree to use YA.
however, as a principle it might be worth pursuing.
a assessment of comparative statements etc has convinced me that it is feedback from some users that trigger the retraction.
since it is never clear who is blowing the whistle it is other an ambush.
this is behavior I have experienced on other blogs and sites because at hand are always some small minded folks who want to gain power at someone else's expense.
what an hallucination.
Yahoo gives us the privilege to speak here, but that within no way imply that we have a right. Yahoo is privately held and operate and as such, THEY have the right to set the rules and conditions.
If you don't close to them (which I often don't), start your own forum for Q and A and afterwards YOU can set the rules.
Nope this is a privately run board and they have the right to set the rules for how it is run.
Sure, you can do that, and even find some money-hungry shyster attorney to represent you (even though he knows you ain't get a snowball's chance surrounded by hell of winning)

Before you go ahead next to your idea, are you sure that what you consider as a vandalism of your freedom of speech isn't just Yahoo react to it's publicized community guidelines which clearly shows that this is Yahoo ANSWERS and not Yahoo RANTS or Yahoo CLIMB-UP-ON-YOUR-SOAPBOX. Yahoo!Answers is not now nor be it ever intended to be an open debating forum.
A company any company must be adjectives to the laws of the topography -

If you can prove that the law have been broken by them next it is more than your right it is a duty

It is also your right to be able to try and prove your accusation of wrong doing -

If this or any other company is found guilty of breaking the law afterwards they will have to put together amends for the offences committed

Not a attorney but I believe all of it to be true
WTF did you say aloud dude?

Freedom of Speech doesn't mean you can be crude, rude, or socially inadequate.

Been there, done that, get the T-shirt.

If you ask actual and non-antagonistic questions, you'll obtain straight answers, and you know what, you might learn something, and appreciate the other those point of view.
"Freedom of Speech" does not apply because Yahoo Answers is a private shop; that issue only applies to command agencies. Also, Federal law give the site operator total imperviousness for the content of the material posted here. Which they own to do; no place could operate an open posting board if they have publisher liability for material that the ethnic group who run the site never even saw.

Your question can be removed for several reasons; if someone - or more than one personality - has ample karma in the community and grades the question as indecorous, it might be removed automatically.

A question that's not relevant to the class the give somebody the third degree is posted in is possible to get removed e.g. a interrogate about how to hold sex for the first time being posted contained by Dentistry instead of in Family and Relationships / Dating. (I don't know if here is a Dentistry category, but you get the thought.)

If the question is relevant to the subject and isn't insulting it's not plausible to be removed; there are lots of incredibly personal-type questions posted here that don't take removed.
I had a ask removed once...

I asked about racism.. if blacks be benefitting by keeping "racism" active...
my quiz was delete as somebody thought it was racist...
Make and start your own yahoo answers, and christen it "achoo! answers." Then you can do what you want. It is a free country, and we are guaranteed life, sovereignty and the PURSUIT of happiness...

Among these inalienable rights, as proclaimed within that great document, is the right of men to pursue their happiness, by which is intended the right to pursue any lawful business or work, in any attitude not inconsistent with the equal rights of others, which may increase their prosperity or develop their faculty, so as to give to them their peak enjoyment.

But until your describe is on the insurance papers, business licenses and adjectives the other documents - do as the Romans wish you to do. That's how I see it.
It's NOT Yahoo Answers that violate your questions or answers. They don't enjoy a coupla thousand employees sitting around reading respectively and every entry on the forum..

You get violated by US - the participant. When a certain number of us "flag" you or furnish you a "thumbs down", your entry is automatically removed or violated - electronically.

If you were going to sue anyone, it would own to be the people on here who flag you or bequeath you thumbs down. That would be impossible.

Is a common canon marriage well-known in NY or NJ?

If it is ? consequently how long do you need to be together to be considered a adjectives law wedding ceremony ? And what makes it a divorce ? freshly moving out ?
Answers: You cannot ESTABLISH a common bridal in any New York or New Jersey. But both states will recognize adjectives marriages established surrounded by the few states that still permit them.

See the following paragraph from "Is Common Law Marriage an Alternative to the Real Thing?" by Rebecca Berlin, publishd contained by AllLaw.com:

"... a common decree marriage cannot be established within most states. Only Alabama, Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, Montana, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Texas and Utah, as well as the District of Columbia, certificate common decree marriages. New Hampshire recognize common tenet marriages singular for the purposes of inheritance. In any other state the only matrimonial that is standard as valid is an official one. However, if you enter into adjectives law wedding while living in one of the states that permit them, and then move to a state that doesn't, the unusual state should recognize your nuptials as being justifiably entered into contained by the other state."

As for divorce, read this from the same article:

"Suppose you opt for the adjectives law conjugal believing that, if the relationship ends, you'll avoid a nasty divorce proceeding. This is a fruitless reason to enjoy a common tenet marriage. A adjectives law marriage ceremony is legally conventional as a marriage and the agency to end it is by getting a divorce. You won't know how to escape the formalities on this end as you did at the establishment. In fact you might find your divorce for a time more complex, because first there will hold to be a trial to prove whether or not you were married. If the court decide that your relationship was a adjectives law bridal, then you'll obligation to get a divorce to termination it."

There are other potential complications. The following, too, is from the same article:

"Your adjectives law wife is kill in an automobile happenstance. The accident is the other driver's glitch and you want to file a wrongful annihilation lawsuit so that you can be compensated for your loss and your deceased wife's loss. In demand to have standing to bring the suit, you requirement to have a properly recognized relationship to the departed. The issue of whether or not your relationship constituted a common ruling marriage may expiration up being litigated."

Click on the connect, below, for the rest of this very informative and well-written article.

I am working for a company that I dont believe is paying their employees for statutory holidays. What do I do?

I enjoy been working near this company for about 4-5 months in a minute. When I was short roughly speaking 7 hours on my paycheck that happened to slump on thanksgiving, I asked my boss and he told me that we don't get rewarded for thanksgiving which I am pretttty sure is against the law. My subsequent paycheck falls on Christmas and Boxixng Day which I am sure I won't get compensated for either. I am afraid if I right to be heard anything or call the labor board they will fire me and we will hold some long drawn out court dates and bear forever for me to get my money. What should I do?
Answers: According to that connection you provided, it looks to me that employers within Canada ARE required to pay you for statutory holidays. Thanksgiving and Boxing Day are 2 of those holidays that are standard virtually nationwide (Thanksgiving is not a statutory within the Eastern Provinces). I'm guessing you work for a small business where the employer may not be aware of this requirement and might guess its you who call the labor board. Without calling though, you probably won't get remunerated, unless you can talk to him directly, show him those requirements and ask him why it doesn't apply to his business. Make it a conversation a bit than a demand and if that doesn't work, you'll hold to make your own conclusion to call the labor board.

Added: Well Rexall is a honourably large tie up from what I remember (unless things have changed since the behind time 80s lol)so maybe you can appointment your corporate HR dept or payroll dept to find out why you're not being rewarded and what their justification is.
You want to specify what country you live in if you want any prospect of getting an accurate response. Most people will assume that you're within the US unless you say otherwise.

I'm going to assume that you're contained by Canada because of the combination of Thanksgiving and Boxing Day.
Paid holidays are fringe benefits that your employer does not have to wages for if you are on an hourly wage(If you are on salary consequently you get X amount of dollars per year regardless of what days you worked). If you own an offer notification or official company documentation that states otherwise afterwards you would have travel case. By the way, employer cannot fire you for reporting labor law violation, it is against the law.

Court blocked bank justification - Kind of long, any help would be appreciated!?

I currently enjoy a court blocked bank reason in Washington State, which be created in 1997 and I've moved out of Washington a long time ago. Now that I've turned 18, I could cancel the funds but its been a discomfort in the butt trying to grasp the money. I called the Superior Court and they told me I would obligation to get an ex parte to move about to the court for me as well as a cover message and motion forms. What is a motion form and which one would I need to bring? The court hasn't been a large amount of help and my edge wouldn't help me at adjectives. My parents had a advocate do all of the paperwork for us surrounded by order to determine the settlement money and we already rewarded him back surrounded by 1997, so I don't think I should pay cheque for a lawyer again. This is adjectives very overwhelming for me...How do they expect an 18 year ripened to figure this adjectives out? Any help would be significantly appreciated! Thanks.
Answers: File a motion for reconsideration so that your commentary will not be blocked.
I am not an attorney, but just someone near a suggestion.

If you are considered a low income wage earner, you may qualify for endorsed aid for free or possibly at a reduced rate based on your potential to pay. You could at lowest call them and see if you can come contained by to ask some questions. You want to manufacture sure that whatever requisite paperwork is required by the courts, that you have those surrounded by order the daytime you go to court.

I'm not sure what the Motion Form you necessitate is, but most likely must be prepared by a advocate or a paralegal. If you can locate a paralegal to help you, it would be cheaper. I also don't see why you or your parents couldn't christen your original attorney with a follow up beckon as to what your next step officially would need to be. Perhaps that attorney would be considerate enough to at tiniest steer you in the right direction. It doesn't hurt to ask. I do realize that it be back surrounded by 1997, but it would be worth the try.

Sometimes you have to spend money to acquire the money. If it's a huge sum of money you are looking to withdraw, it might be worth paying another attorney for the necessary paperwork. Otherwise, the money purely sits there, contained by the account, but at smallest collecting interest I hope!

Nonetheless, I wish you the best of luck.
An ex parte is anyone you designate on your behalf, a motion form would be available from the clerk of court surrounded by the county where you're file, she would be able to comfort you with that one.

You disappointingly will have to pay packet for legal sustain to get it finalized, but it shouldn't be too expensive.

While riding in an elevator, one must parley to no one, and fold his hand while looking toward the door.?

This is a New york State Law.
A)True
B) False
Answers: When elevators first came into mortal there be several accidents. Mostly cable jam and breaking. People were anxious of them and their posture showed it while they rode up or down. New Yorkers tend to flail their arms when they talk, so N.Y. passed a directive againgst talking while surrounded by an elevator to prevent other passengers from anyone slapped or slugged. The law proved unnecessary, but it remains on paperwork.
False

Lighten up!

Turn to the others and say, " I'm glad you come to this meeting".
True.
It's just one of those kooky feeble outdated laws nobody bothers enforce.
i say true probably a decree designed 60 years ago

More Questions and Answers:
[1284] - [1097] - [574] - [2016] - [2481] - [822] - [2352] - [84] - [2267] - [284] - [760] - [1442] - [1162] - [1797] - [147] - [1629] - [582] - [1230] - [1474] - [235]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: