Law Questions and Answers

My daughter was caught nouns from a grocery store?

They let her stale with a slap on the wrist, which be VERY generous. I be just curious as to whether they will alert other grocery stores contained by our area, or something of the sort. I trust and pray that this will never develop again, but I feel it would be awful if she be ever treated suspiciously for a very doomed to failure mistake. Does anybody know?
Answers: they can not in an executive manner notify anyone else since at hand is no legal story or proof of what they would be saying.
un-officially those talk and associates in like peas in a pod line of business or within the case of a tie up store know others who work in impossible to tell apart stores probably pass on information as a courtesy to respectively other. it is possible someone at another grocery store will know about the incident but they won't know your daughter or own a picture posted in the department with most looked-for written under it.

EDIT:
if they have pressed charges and there be a record they afterwards could pass that information on but probably would not dissipate their time with it.
Lots of little kids shoplift. How antiquated is she?
Did you take her within to apologize? Was she scared?
I shopliften when I be too young to really fathom out what I was doing wrong. My mom made me run up and give it fund and apologize. I was so panicky after that, I never bothered shoplifting again. Make sure you detail her that she could have gone to detention centre and she probably will if she ever does it again.
I doubt they will bother calling any other stores. This probably happens greatly more than you'd think.
Usually they bring up to date the person not to come into the store again. But never throw them out if they do come final in.
My cousin be caught shoplifting from matching grocery store 3 times in 8 months and they permit her go near a warning adjectives three times.
Why don't you go to the store and have a chat to the manager contained by person. Apologize for your relatives, and ask him about the ramification with other local businesses. Personally, I would doubt that anything resembling what you are worried about will surface, but if you're up front, and make an shot to fix the problem, not let it grasp worse, the manager will sort more of an effort to work near you. Good luck.
They are free to do so if they choose. Would it be wrong to be suspicious of somebody who has already demonstrated that they are likely to break the law?

Should females be punished by corporal punishment?

For female students surrounded by schools/ colleges, and female inmates contained by prisons? Men can take the agony, so it wouldn't be a punishment for them. Women would not like the niggle, so they would learn their module.
Answers: First off Inflicting violent behaviour on a human being is evil and wrong unless it is out of self-defense. Punitive hostility is one of the highest forms of hypocrisy.

Having covered that, women own a far higher distress tolerance than men, i don't know where you get the idea that men own a higher tolerance, they unquestionably don't. Women are hardwired to cope with distress as birthgivers.

How about we newly stop hurting people?
If males are, later certainly females should be also.

Equality does not allow ancestors to pick and choose what they will be equal on.
Did they have childbirth wager on in the 19th century where on earth you're living?

C'mon. Get real.
No one should be punished beside corporal punishment. It's called assault and battery-operated and should be universally illegal.

As to women not anyone able to pilfer pain, I'd similar to to see a man give birth. Four times.
Your logic is flawed. The humiliation is primary, the anguish is secondary. The femininity does not matter.

In countries which practice corporal punishment as a criminal punishment (generally, but not exclusively islamic or military), women are punished according to ruling or according to what the judge think is appropriate and will not kill them.

In countries which certification children to be paddled or birched, this is done by a headmaster, headmatron, priest or nun of their own sex, and is practiced on both boys and girls.
All people should be subject to like peas in a pod punishments under the regulation. Equal opportunity means equal accountability. Are we to assume men would LIKE the headache?

Why was Michael Vick charged near Felonies and Qyntel Woods Not?

They both were raise and fighting pit-bulls on their property, but Vick become a felon and Woods was given 80 hours of community service.
Answers: That's the profit of plea bargaining and turning into a witness for the prosecution.
Cause you can bring back more money out of Vick

Need a mentor for bail bond job?

I am current to the business and need a mentor to show me how
to do this available job etc.
Answers: You might want to try getting hired on at an established bail bonds office. You may own to start out at an entry level position and work your channel up, but you'd receive great training this way.

I have be paid for months I did not work and I am not sure what I should do around it!?

I have contacted the branch i worked at but they don't appear to folow it up. Where do i stand legally?
Answers: I am reminded of a friend of mine who go to close an account that he thought have about $15 contained by it. The teller said, "do you want adjectives of it?" He replied how much is in the statement? She said, "$310." He shook his head and said he thought a mistake have been made. She check over the narrative and finally said, "You are right, it is $330." At that he nodded and said, "That's what I thought." He took the money across the street to another edge and opened a fresh account. The point is, try and do the right point. Don't kill yourself doing it. Also, how can I carry a job here?
Write a letter to them to offer you an explaination of why you were compensated this money.

State in the dispatch that you wish to enjoy a response within 14 days.

Then read aloud that if you don't get a reply inside 14 days that you will claim the money.
Legally the company can ask you for it back , once they grasp organised and notice the error , But if as you read aloud you have be trying to get them to sort it out later morally they are on dodgy ground and even if you offer to discharge back at a impressively nominal sum they should really accept .
Make sure you hold documented proof of your attempts to sort it out , like date /times of phone calls and any copy of correspondence .
ssshhhhhh! make available me 50 and i,ll keep your clandestine
spend the lot!!! then when they ensnare up just say-so you didnt realise as you never check your account and next offer to reimburse 5 per week
tell them if nought hapon then the money is your's
Anyone who tell you to spend it or not to worry almost it doesn't know what they are talking roughly. Governments keep meticulous due record and corporate accounting office always correct their errors. It WILL eventually arrest up to you. Do not cash those checks or touch that money until you see within writing that it is lawfully yours. If you spend it you will regret the light of day you get that certified note explaining you were overpaid and hey could you impart it back. Better even so, if you did not earn it, just dispatch it back.
You will hold to pay it fund unfortunately. You would clutch them to a tribunal if they made illegal deduction. Have a chat with the C.A.B.
What a great pity that the first clad answer you were given by 'wizjp' get the trolls thumb down. The bottom line is that if you didn't trade name an attempt to return the money you could be guilty of theft. The sin of theft includes circumstances where on earth you innocently come by property that isn't yours and then proceed to assume the rights of the true owner'. In this shield spend it. You have be correctly advised to do your best to inform the general public who made the mistake, which you have apparently done, You must not spend it but if you put it into a seperate justification it will be there if they ask for it stern. Most legal evaluation also believes that although you have to impart the money back you are in fact allowed to keep any interest that the money earn in the narrative so you will get a touch bit back for your honesty.

Does anyone ever answer questions correctly on this site?

I asked a month ago What law are there on the sidewalks public forum for music contained by state of Washington and city of Spokane? I get this as the best answer
by raichasa...

Best Answer - Chosen by Voters
Sounds similar to you know the laws, but disagree near them and the method of their enforcement?

I have lived surrounded by areas with high-ranking concentrations of street "entertainers". I agree that permits should be required and that local businesses should hold a say surrounded by that process. Why? Because a lot of these "entertainers" are doing little more than panhandling and driving away patrons of taxpaying brick and mortar businesses.

Which didn't answer the cross-question.
I have a license.
But look at the quiz again. Was it answered. only an belief was given, later I added more detail for an answer.
Look at the question, again. Can anyone truly answer it
Its a researchable one . beside a legal answer on the statute books somewhere. Which I cannot find. Come on people
Answers: Your expectations are exactly those of my actual clients. They regard every lawyer know every law contained by every jurisdiction, no matter how esoteric. GET REAL! If anyone have that range of wisdom and the time needed to acquire that knowledge, they would not be answering question on the internet.

The obvious place to find the answer to your examine would be to ask the people that created the statute or enforce the law applicable to "street entertainers". Maybe the City and State within which the law will be enforced? In the final analysis, it would be the law's enforcement that will impact your natural life.

The police department would know the situations that would cause them to trademark an arrest. Their answer would be the most germane.
I might interject here that if you are looking for sound permissible advice you should not consult a ragtag group of internet savvy those with too much time on their hand, but rather you should consult someone learned in your singular regions law.

You could try calling/emailing your local sprite department.
Yes there are a great deal of correct answers on this site.

I'm sorry your experience with this specific question didn't group your expectations. Yes it's a researchable question by both the asker and those that would answer you. I would suggest you ring up the city of Spokane and ask for their legal department and ask them just about those laws, or the insufficiency of. Another good possibility would be to send for the Police Dept. or Codes Enforcement in Spokane. One of those should know how to answer your question.
I hold had matching problem, and asked how to delete a question (here: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;... ). I be given an email address to write to...but the question near a wrong answer is still online: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...

The system is broken. There are tons of wrong answers marked as answers due to the flawed voting system.

Ex-employer won't pay for expense report.?

I go on a training trip in October. I have to pay for meal and etc out of pocket. I found a new situation and left later week and now they are clich that they will not pay for my expenses that they be going to. Does anyone have any suggestion on what I should do?
Answers: Depends on your State.

In some states, such as CA, an employer is legally obligated to reimburse such expenses. In several states they aren't.

However, even if your State doesn't require it, you might still have a shield if the employer told you ahead of time that they would pay it, base on the legal concept of "detrimental reliance" - ie you spent the money just because your employer told you he'd pay you backbone.

Your State labor board would be the first place to check, but in most places they don't settlement with expenses. If they don't or can't assistance, you can write to your employer reminding them that they said they'd pay, and asking for the money. If they don't rate, then you can sue them surrounded by small claims court for the money.

To daisy - the practice that you describe is illegal beneath both Federal labor law AND the labor law of most States, except under secure clearly defined parameters.

First, the training must be clearly transferable to other employment. The cost of training someone on, for example, your companies internal accounting procedures must be at the employer expense, but the cost of doing a "Quickbooks" school 'could' be made an hand cost.

Second, the training must be optional to the member of staff. If your boss tells you you enjoy to do it, he has to take-home pay for it.

Third, the employee must agree within advance, and within writing, that she will be responsible for reimbursing the training costs if she leaves the company within a solid period.

The poster said "in a minute they are saying that they will not reward for my expenses that they were going to." That tell me that she had NOT agreed surrounded by advance to be responsible for the expenses if she quit.

Richard
Lots of employer have policies against paying for someone's expenses when they start out a company. Where I work if you leave inwardly 6 months of that training and they paid for any portion they purloin it out of your last check. You are not automatically entitled to reimbursement. You want to check the policies of your former employer.

Jim Crow Laws?

If this law be put into place where you live what would you do? and what do you devise about it?
"No white can jump into a black persons park, and no black s can jump into a white persons park..."

and /or

whoever prints say or advertises equality between blacks and whites and agrees near intermarriage between races will be sent to prison for up to 6 days and a fine of 500$

(these be back contained by the 1900's (early))
Answers: I would protest. I think it is unwarranted, undemorcratic and undermines America.
I wouldn't meet the terms them and challenge the Supreme Court.
Then when they rule that a Tomato is a Vegitable, I won't be the one looking resembling a fool.
yeah i would probably do what they did back afterwards..that's tough to imagine too, i would decimate myself!
Neither law could stand if enact today.

The first law would violate the 14th amendment, and the second one would violate the first amendment.

Oh, and by the instrument, there be nothing ridiculous nearly the courts ruling on whether a tomato was a fruit or a vegetable. They never ruled on any such entity. Even in the terminology of the actual ruling the court recognizes that a tomato is, within botanical terms, a fruit. What the ruling said be that did not bar Congress from taxing it as a vegetable if they chose to. There be another case right almost the same time where on earth someone tried to get a duty credit on bean sales by claiming that beans be seeds, not vegetables. The court ruled like way on that one - botanically, beans are indeed seed, but in everyday usage, citizens think of them as veggies, and it's decriminalized for Congress to classify than as such for tax purposes.

Richard

UK now outlawing Samurai swords, what next, sticks and stones?

Britain plans to sanction the sale of samurai swords because the weaponry have be used in a little serious, high-profile attacks. The Home Office (Britain's Interior Ministry) said on Wednesday the swords would be added to its Offensive Weapons Order from April next year, significance they could not be imported, sold or hired. However collectors of bona fide Japanese swords and those used by martial arts enthusiasts would be exempt from the sanction.

Lets see, ban guns, nope antagonism still happening, surrounded by fact go up. Now swords. The stupid just never seem to end.
Answers: Pointy knife are on the list as powerfully,I believe...

Next ?
Sharp tongues ?

Pointed remarks?
Swords and bricks and stones?

Hardly the same are they
I imagine its a good view, what else would you use a samurai sword for apart from hurting someone, buttering bread?

Is it illegal to telephone call yourself a medical doctor if you have an MD from a non-accredited college?


Answers: In most jurisdiction, physicians need political affairs permission to practice. Such approval is intended (a), to promote public safety, and (b), regularly to protect the public purse, as medical care is commonly subsidised by national government.

Regulation of all medical practitioners (physicians contained by the broad sense)

Among the English-speaking countries, this process is known any as licensure as in the United States, or as registration, eg surrounded by the United Kingdom, the Commonwealth and Ireland. Synonyms in use elsewhere include colegiación surrounded by Spain, ishi menkyo in Japan, autorisasjon surrounded by Norway, Approbation in Germany, and "δεια εργασα" within Greece. In France, Italy and Portugal, civilian physicians must be a member of the Order of physicians to practice prescription.

In some countries, including the United Kingdom and Ireland, the profession largely regulates itself, with the management affirming the regulating body's authority. The best known example of this is probably the General Medical Council of Britain. In adjectives countries, the regulating authorities will revoke permission to practice contained by cases of malpractice or serious misconduct.

In the large English-speaking federation (USA, Canada, Australia), the licensing or registration of medical practitioners is done at a state or adjectives level. Australian states usually enjoy a "Medical Board," while Canadian provinces usually have a "College of Physicians and Surgeons." All American states hold an agency which is usually called the "Medical Board", although here are alternate names such as "Board of Medicine," "Board of Medical Examiners", "Board of Medical Licensure", "Board of Healing Arts", etc. After graduate from medical school, physicians who decision to practice in the USA usually purloin standardized exams, such as the USMLE for allopathic physicians or COMLEX-USA for osteopathic physicians, which enable them to pick up a certificate to practice from the appropriate state agency.


Regulation of specialists surrounded by internal medicine (physicians surrounded by the narrow sense)

Most countries hold some method of officially recognize specialist qualifications within all branches of prescription, including internal medicine. Sometimes, this aims to promote public safekeeping by restricting the use of hazardous treatments. For example, in Australia, one and only specialist physicians (internists in USA) or specialist dermatologists may with authorization prescribe istretinoin (this is a powerful drug useful contained by treating severe acne, but may cause severe and adjectives types of adverse drug reaction). Other reasons for regulating specialists may include: standardization of confession for hospital employment, restriction on which practitioners are entitled to receive higher insurance payments for specialist services, and, as occasionally alleged, restriction of specialist numbers to decline competition.
You can call yourself a Medical Doctor but you can't practice prescription.

More Questions and Answers:
[2286] - [1268] - [723] - [727] - [1587] - [1296] - [2016] - [2155] - [1344] - [2026] - [1185] - [1585] - [908] - [1248] - [1776] - [1769] - [869] - [979] - [2564] - [1940]


The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: