Law Questions and Answers
Changing jobs?
I'm within the process of changing job, and I have a press regarding break benefits. My current company's vacation policy used to be that your break days would always re-new at your anniversary date after in Oct.07 (effective immediately) they changed the policy so that your time off days are now accrue and if you terminate your employment next to the company your vacation time would be reconciled at the time of employement termination. My anniversary date be 8/25/07 my question is Since my anniversary date be before the policy transfer am I entitled to all of my time off time that renewed 8/25 or am I subjected to the new policy? gratefulness for your help...Answers: It depends on what the policy say, but I’m going to bet you are under the tentative policy. Sometimes a company will let populace stay under an single policy in that crust the policy will state that and it would read something like this.
“All body with a state date of XX/XX/XXX will accrue time off time at X, employees who stated past XX/XX/XXXX will have their leave time….”
If it read more like this
“Vacation time will accrue at X”
Then you are below the new policy.
Like I said I’m going to bet you’re underneath the new policy, and yes they can alter it anytime they please.
Hoped it helped.
Well, I'm not sure I appreciate the sequence of events, but based only on my understanding of what you presented, I judge you'll leave lower than the new policy.
But whichever it is, you can bet the company will try and use the one most beneficial to itself.
It would hold been apposite to have both policies written verbatim to deduce.
Can a crime be so heinous that even the most logical person will find it firm to believe?
Even if the evidence and proof can be confirmed?Answers: As one who works in regulation enforcement, nothing surprises me anymore.
It happen all the time.
Jeffery Dahmer be a case within point. He would lure young men to his apartment beside the promise of alcohol and drugs, kill them, dismember them, store them contained by his refrigerator and eat them.
next to today's forensic evidence and watching Cold Case Files, nothing is implausible any more.
Nothing will shock this world anymore.
I mean look at the pollution Hollywood is spewing out these days.
Poeple remuneration money to see the most creative way humans can be mutilated.
Nothing short of incoming Abombs will rouse this country up from its present slumber.
NO.
Especially when one understands psychology.
The mind is a living cesspool next to the ugliest garbage talented of floating to the top and influencing the body to effect it. Most humans only use smaller quantity than 1% of the brain. Those who use more of their brain can conceive some pretty astonishing things -- good and desperate.
I still have trouble believing how the minds of racist, Nazis, child killers and corporate thieve who steal employees' pension money, function.
I KNOW they're out near - I just can't visualize what they are THINKING.
How or why the crime was committed isn't necessarily logical. If in attendance is no evidence to support her claim, it's not going to hold water.
Is it illegal to own a lighter on you when your 16?
im only 16 but i enjoy a zippo lighter that i like to play around near. i dont smoke or anything like that but is it permitted to carry around a lighter as a minor?Answers: No.
Not however, but the way our country is head it may soon be.
Is a construction contractor legally and financially responsible for unsatisfactory work?
I hired a contractor to replace some dry rotted floorboards on my front porch. However, the alleged repair work doesn't look any better than what was near before. The boards are still shifting and warped. I phoned him to express my dissatisfaction and expectation that he would bring in things right. He said since his company was an LLC so I couldn't sue him, and that he wasn't responsible since he did not truly do the work himself. He had a relative and another man do the career. I think he's full of bulls**t and trying to put one over. The contract said the boards would be "repaired" but his definition of "repaired" is apparently different form mine. He's get my money and it looks like he simply painted over the old boards and hoped I wouldn't awareness. What should I do?Answers: First off I'm sorry you received poor work from that contractor, I, similar to the person above me is a contractor.
My policy is to write surrounded by my contracts that the job will be finished to customers satisifaction until that time payment is expected.
It really bothers me that he is hiding down is LLC for not doing a good employment. It matters not one iota that he did not in actual fact do the work.
I get call from people out near all the time just about some poor lady hires a contractor and something go wrong with the work or the pay-out is not what they expected and a million other complaints. They call me and ask what they should do.
I put in the picture them to only hire contractors that stipulate they will solitary be paid when the situation is satisfactorily completed. Also that they will be compensated at the end one lump sum i.e. predetrmined before any paperwork is signed.
There is one big handyman type company out in attendance that simply charges $60.00 an hour and the customer has no theory how long it will take and how much it will cost. These companies spawn a killing contained by profits. I cannot confirm this but I believe they purposly work slow to increase their profits.
When my company is hired we have a set price so it is surrounded by our best interest to get the profession done quickly, also next to the satisfaction clause we won't kind a penny unless it is good work.
It might not be a fitting idea to sue this guy, it will surrounded by the end probably cost you more money to simply maybe receive a settlement in your favor-- a tough lesson.
I noticed at tiniest one other poster in here said to never confer the contractor any money up front and generally this is honest advice, however contained by some situations the contractor simply doesn't have the currency on hand to buy the materials. The contractor shouldn't be punished and not bring back the job simply because he is poor. If it make you feel more not dangerous go out and buy the stuff to be exact necessary for him to do the work, however never salary for labor up front.
Licensing is another issue, use your judment whether you will require it. Licenses are hard to receive and maintain, if the work is simple freshly get a contract. If your going to be spending some material money then as you would expect get a licensed contractor and constraint to see liability insurance.
You can sue a corporation so he was unfolding you a lie. (What a shock---a lying contractor.)
I imagine the only point to do is to file a covering in Small Claims court against him to return with your money back. Perhaps when he get served with the court documents he will settled to settle with you out of court. However, I wouldn't consent to him do the job over again because I suppose he'll do a lousy job again simply because he'll be mad at you.
So, help yourself to him to Small Claims. Lawyers aren't allowed there---everyone has to represent himself.
I am a Contractor also. You may not be capable of sue his LLC because he can just cash it.
My advise to you is:
See if he is Licensed and Insured. If so get a complaint to your local licensing board.
Sue him instinctively.
Well, you say two things: first you vote you hired him to "replace" rotted boards; then next, you say the contract said the boards should be "repaired." That is a really BIG difference. If the contract say repaired, then don't expect hot lumber.
You can sue him--you have a contract. Just because he is an LLC or because he farm the job out doesn't close-fisted you can't sue.
As a matter of reality, unless the contract says he can substitute someone to do the work, he may own substantially breached the contract by failing to do the work himself. You could sue for specific performance. Or you could "cover"--pay someone to do the work right, and sue to have that charge paid for.
** Note: This is a broad discussion of the subject matter of your interrogate and not legal direction. Local laws or your precise situation may change the nonspecific rules. For a specific answer to your question you should consult permissible counsel with whom you can discuss adjectives the facts of your case. **
First of adjectives did you have a written estimate of the work to be
done, If no after you have a he said she said we said, Without
a outline contained by hand signed by the supposed contractor you get
what you paid for nought. U can complain to the better business bureau,, but thats like kissing your sister, No punch.
In the adjectives when dealing with contractors follow this format.
1. Get a copy of in attendance current state contractors liscense.
2. Get a full estimate of work to be done and performed by
who, and signed by the contractor, If he is going to sub- it out,
Get the signature of the sub, earlier the work begins... Do not
lower than any circumstance ever pay up front for materials or work,,,, Pay individual after completion ,
Hope this helps
I am Licensed GC and you can sue a LLC, and if he is an owner of the LLC he can be held responsible first ring up your local licensing agency and database a complaint. Take some photos of the work and send them to your local building inspector or code enforcement officer.
Some more thoughts for you:
Did you check his license and insurance?
Did you rate him 100% before the work be done? You shouldn't have done that.
Did you pay packet him after work was done? If so, your reward constitutes a acceptance of the work?
Is at hand a written warranty?
Not all contractors slump.
My legal proposal is this. Read over the contract for the work carefully. If he did not fully hold up his completion, HE can be sued not the LLC. Basically for your own sanity, it would be best to capture your money back surrounded by court and ask a reputable contractor to do the work. The best contractors get the majority of their work through word of mouth.
Is a 17 year old competent to decide who she/he wishes to live with here within the UK?
Answers: Yes you can leave home at 16 but you can not marry contained by England and Wales until you are 18 without your parents say-so. That is the law, however I and probably your parents know differently. A boy and more so a girl of 17 years of age is a much different human being to one of 21 years of age you will change so much over the subsequent 4 or 5 years that it is likely that you will not even want to know your current love by next. There are exceptions but they are very dying out and neither of you know if you will be that fortunate. In any long term relationship nearby are problems and disagreements which can not be foreseen by your parents yourselves or anyone else other than they know they will arise. So whilst I look liberally upon your wishes I would suggest that at 17 you can not and do not know if you should settle for this person as your lifelong partner. I know I will not acquire ten points for this, but I assure you it is an honest answer.
Hello Ray L !
It must be as in India i.e. 21 yrs for boys and 18 yrs for girls.
If here is variation, I w'd ernestly be waiting to know.
legitimately or personally?
legitimately yes but personally it depends on the parenthood of the 17 year old if she / he can net the right choice
yup though economically it may not be a good choice until he/she have a good opportunity
Who think pakiston commander-in-chief was the perspective of the murder of bhetto? also who think the middle east is corrupt?
except iraq and afganstanAnswers: Iraq is not corrupt!!
Quite possibly Musharrif be involved. It gives him a origin to cancel elections.
As for corruption, the Middle East is a short time ago as corrupt as the U.S., only beside less power to create corruption.
I doubt he have anything to do with it as he have even more to lose than he could gain from her death. It be the radical Islamist who both Mushy and Bhutto count as enemy.
A lot of third world governments are corrupt contained by a major sense.
Can you get a restraining direct on a sociopath?
even though the person hasnt physically hurt you. but have emotionally hurt you by stealing, lying, cheating, manipulating, ect...anyone evil and conning...or do they have to [physically hurt me surrounded by order to bring back it.Answers: Why stop with a restraining decree? Why not try to arrange an Involuntary Commitment hearing?
The account of reasons below are valid reason for obtaining a restraining charge in California.
Was fierce
Threatened you
Stalked you
Acted in a mode that scared you.
Search for "Battered Women" "Restraining Order" "Your State"
There are frequent women's organizations that may know how to help you. Find one contained by the your area. Try the handset book, www, too. If you can't find a local organization afterwards try calling one in your state. They may know how to refer you to a local source of help and backing you with your alternatives.
Advice or stories from police officers, or associates that knew them.?
I am a 16 year weak girl who wants to becomea police officer and I be wondering what is some of the things that most people never make clear to you or allow you to hear about individual a police officer. Because if I am to become a police officer I need to know adjectives the information that I can or advice or even how you like being a police officer. ThanksAnswers: I enjoy several cop friends. One thing they may not collaborate about is that in attendance are two kinds of cops: Cowboys and Angels.
Cowboy: Generally, be a bully as a kid or was bullied as a kid. Loves guns. Loves the power.
Angels: Wants to better the community. Does much more community interaction. Carries a gun because they hold to.
These two sides create tension surrounded by every department. The first side are usually idiots and make up the majority of cops. The second side usually ends up depressed and disillusioned.
You promise with angry ancestors all the time.
Can someone with a criminla transcript be a lawyer?
Answers: It depends on the journal and on the state bar association. Most state bar will admit relations with some criminal history, particularly if the charges are elder or minor, but the person applying to be admit to the bar will necessitate to be prepared to explain the record to the handrail ethics committee.
The fundamental thing the inn is concerned with is your honesty. As a result, a conviction for perjury will pretty much throw you out.
Every state have different standards, but they will generally want to see that you own moved on and tried to right your life.
You will possible need to gather round with the Bar Ethics Board and present your covering.
Suing a family contestant for money owed?
Kinda a long story so I apologize- My young mother-in-law moved within w/ us over a year ago after separating fr her husband (he is not my husband's biological dad). She is still under his Blue Cross medical insurance. We enjoy been paying for her medication in which it is reimbursed by blue cross, but the discount money is sent to the primary insurer which is her husband (he lives 3 states away)Anyway, a $ 900.00 dollar check was sent to him and he be told previously that any money sent to him from blue cross was ours, and he needed to forward it to us (this be 7 months ago) he did write us a check, sent it, but it bounced. He said he inadvertantly paid too much for a bill and be taken out from his account. He next said he would make payments, all right, he sent a hundered here and there, he still owes us $300 and is immediately avoiding our calls- we are now planning on taking this to small claims court, conversation to his mom about this is useless because she still desires him to take her back-
Answers: Well, first of adjectives, legally, the money belongs to your mom, not you. If she agrees to reimburse you for your transmittal for her medicine, that's her business.
This is the form of thing that can be taken thought of easily surrounded by a divorce. If your Mom & Husband are going to get a divorce, the Court can decree him to reimburse her pharmacy expenses.
You should also call BC & explain the situation to them, and see if they own a solution. They may agree to send her the reimbursement (I doubt it--too much liability), but they may know how to deal directly next to a pharmacy that you use, and have the pharmacy bill BC directly.
Go ahead and shift to SC Court, but I doubt if you will prevail. You have no contract or agreement from him to foot you (except maybe an oral agreement), but you hold to go to Oregon, where on earth he lives, to sue.
** Note: This is a general discussion of the subject issue of your question and not allowed advice. Local law or your particular situation may transmute the general rules. For a specific answer to your put somebody through the mill you should consult legal counsel near whom you can discuss all the facts of your travel case. **
lesson learned...money and line never mix.move on...
More Questions and Answers:
[1001] - [951] - [1809] - [1618] - [928] - [1448] - [813] - [1763] - [2423] - [1999] - [922] - [1422] - [1915] - [262] - [1260] - [1032] - [1996] - [2080] - [1157] - [2497]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: