Law Questions and Answers

My question for Hillary ( spelled correctly this time)?

As for anyone who said I be a Republican, you are WRONG.
I used to be registered as an Independent, but changed to Democrat when Kearry & Edwards were runnng.
We do have need of a socialized medical program in the US, not the band-aid that Bush have given to Part D , medicare, perscription coverage. Many retired or disabled people can better afford to live within Mexico, than in their own country, so we should be capable of use our medicare wherever we live, and if the medical bills are lower within Mexico, that only save America some money. Saving money is what the rich are about as i.e. why they have shiped our job out of the country and treat the people doing our labor the route
Grow up the rich get richer, the low and middle income wage earners verbs to struggle. As far as an education, I own one, however my parents weren't so lucky, so instead of saving my money for my golden years I did as the Bible say, honor your mother and father, give to them first and those who don't are hippocrites
Answers: Well you assumed we are adjectives christian. I am part of the 1%, and that would be 3 million atheists contained by america. Anyways, you cant blame your financial misfortunes on the government. The middle class' struggles are zilch more than cry babies who dont consider how much better they are living than the rest of the world.
Ugh what is your question again?

Crazy flight attendant?

I know a woman who is very nice, however..economically, CRAZY.I was conversation to her recently,and she told me that she is in the order of to begin training to be a flight attendant for the chief airline that she already works a desk job for.
I find this VERY disturbing-she is NICE,however she drinks uncontrollably(DUIs),and have a history of violently attacking her husband and her teen sons.She be even detained once for trying to kill herself within front of her kids.As nice as I think she is, I am also completely well aware that she only is NOT mentally stable.Obviously she has kept her stroke together enough to continue her job for a year, but I am upset to swot that she would be considered for this type of a high-stress possition
I fly frequently, and I am very disturbed that she be even CONSIDERED for such a high pressure position. It make me feel approaching this airline does not even CARE who they hire-I don't want to hurt her, but I feel this issue requirements to be addressed next to the airline-agree or disagree? How?
Answers: please call Children's Aid and ask them to check on her children.

if you ever see her procure behind the rudder while drunk, call the cops.

i know it's knotty, but you cannot let innocent individuals be hurt by her insanity.
stewardesses are all crazy, I've kinda found that.
tolerate her be, she should be fine.
I agree with you 100 %.what if she flipped while within the middle of a flight? OMG!
I would definately say something. The airlines might even do a environment check and find out that she has a criminal situation.I hope they do!
Good Luck!
Many practicing alcoholics manage to hold down their job. We can only hope her true colors come out within the psych evaluation.

Otherwise, we can only hope we never closing stages up on her flights!!!
disagree. the airline can handle their own problems. if she have a desk job and have sustained it for this long, she must be getting her work done. some people can manipulate work better than they can handle home duration.
on the other hand, perchance you should talk to someone something like the problem with her kids. that's a precarious issue that needs to be address
This must be a difficult situation to be in!

I infer you owe it to the passengers of potential adjectives flights to make your view of this woman heard.

If I be you, I would write an anonymous letter to the company and tolerate them investigate.

Trust me, with adjectives the bad publicity that poor airport / aircraft collateral has, I'm sure they would lug this letter remarkably seriously and address the issues at hand.

Hope I've be of some help!

Merry Christmas!
your concerns are valid; however, the airline she works for feel she is a suitable candidate for the assignment. Although she works for the airline already, they may conduct another background check on her. If nearby isn't anything to disqualify her then here isn't much you can do about it.

Having worked for an airline pre-9/11 they do pretty thorough environment investigations for security reason, I imagine after 9/11 the requirements are tougher. If you touch that strongly either contact the airline or fly a different holder.
And yet you choice to hang down around her. Pretty hypocritical of you. Are you with her when she is partying frozen, where do you draw the smudge. She is not going to fly the plane and I will hope that airline will take a look at her olden history. Going for training is not getting the job.

Funny how you want others to draw the strip, but you haven't had the guts to do it even so. How long have you specified her?

Edit:
Ahh the crazy loon comes out. Mrs. Busybody in your neighbors business. Obviously you are a two face. I bet she comes over your house and you just knees of her drama, while smiling in her frontage. As soon as she leaves you spread the gossip. Close your drapes and be more of a woman.

Edit:
Well I for one am not going to appease you. So I will transmit you once again by honest opinion just about your "none of your business" situation. You asked for it by the way.

You appear to get to pick and choice when you want to cooperate crap about this woman. Whenever she is coming over to you voluntarily you don't mind listen to her drama with a smile on your facade. All the time knowing for well that this woman have issues. She obviously is providing you beside some pathetic sense of entertainment surrounded by your life. She is nice as long as she is keeping you up near her drama. Niceness aside if you had a problem next to her drinking you would had constrained contact with her or probably if possible suggest she take some help. I individually don't do the drama, maybe that is to say just you.

Now for the flight attendant available job. She is being trained. Trained does not close-fisted hired. It is pretty high and mighty of you to assume that the airlines will look elapse concerns that gave you something to yap give or take a few on your free time.

You are a busy body. Let the airlines do their job. You will find another person's business to stick your feeler in. Most importantly sign up to be my supporter, it is much better than following me around like a puppy.
Have you even considered that this assignment may be improving her state of mind?

This woman may be the mode who acts out unsuccessfully in the privacy of her own home, but can be clearly normal next to strangers. She may just be an attention-craving drama queen next to her family, but own another, much more normal side to her identity with the rest of society.

If she's have this job for a year, she's already "battle-hardened". It proves she's a great deal tougher mentally than you give her credit for.

I've worked near a lot of folks who seemed commonplace, but had rather interesting secrets. It seem that you have a short time ago seen this woman at her worst. However, if she's doing in good health in this position, it may be exactly the thoughtful of atmosphere she thrives in.

The airline screen people for mental disorders. If she's going a bit bonkers, they'll lock in it. Her co-workers are in a much better position to evaluate her mental state of mind. If they start feeling uneasy around her, be assured they aren't shy in the region of saying so to direction.

How can I know my rights in suggestion to a Will?

I don't even like discussing this type of entry but I have never be in this situation earlier and I have be searching for information adjectives night. Someone contained by the family just this minute passed away and they did have a will and here is an Executor, of course, however that Executor have said that he is over not just distributing the money but that literally everyone will be given at hand money but then I will enjoy to go to him and he will want if what I need the money for is perfect enough and this is how it is supposedly written surrounded by the Will. He claims to be MY Trustee. I am an adult and I thought single a minor could have a trustee and this soul has a partiality to be vindictive towards me anyway. Is this really true? I mean, can this be lawfully drawn out this way? If so, can I jump to Probate Court or file a form stating that this personality had such reason to make it this course and did help surrounded by the filling out of the Will? Do I own any rights in varying this or seeing a copy of the Will? Please help..
Answers: The will is a public transcript once filed for probate. Get down to the probate court and carry a copy. Make sure it is written as the ex says it is. IF so, you carry what he gives you. If you disagree, push for him you will be reviewing the final accounting when filed, and if you don't be aware of the distribution obeys the will, you will database notice near the probate court to challenge the distribution and final portrayal (different terms surrounded by different states). You may need a probate atty. THe ongoing use of the word trustee could tight-fisted instead of a distribution the money went into a trust beside the trustee oversseing distribution instead of specific bequests.
If the person who made the will be "of sound mind" when the will be made, the will must be enforced. It was their money to distribute as they wish. The only exception is if the party was within fact not of nouns mind, acted under duress (included populace by force against their wishes) or excluded dependant children (in UK this usually means lower than 18)

If you think the executor is not carrying out your relative's second wishes contact a solicitor.
Yes, you have rights - contained by general, if someone is acting as your trustee, they hold a "fiduciary" duty to you, and there may be ways to defy their behavior if a violation of that duty exists.

The will is predictable registered either surrounded by a court or county clerk's office, and if it is individual probated, there should be public documentation available at the court that handles probate cases.

This is a correlation to an article called "How to Find Legal Help When You Can't Afford It"

http://www.courtreference.com/court-refe...

and it list a variety of online resources for every state, including endorsed information and links to organizations that proffer free or low-cost legal warning and assistance.

People make adjectives kinds of arrangements beside wills and trusts, and it may be that there is money alloted for your didactic or other certain types of expenses, even though you are an mature. There are ways to address this kind of situation, but you requirement information and advice specific to your state.
Well I thought that anyone who be left something contained by a Will had the right to prospect the Will. I think you should move about to a non-involved Solicitor about this as Executors are supposed to exploit in honest faith as the virtual agent of the being who made the Will (the Testator) and this Executor might be a bit dodgy so get your own permissible advice as soon as possible and your Lawyer will consequently view a copy of the Will and work out whether or not that Executor is doing the right entry and not getting too wrapped up in his own power. Could you conceivably ring the Law firm who did the will to ask if you have a right to see a copy of it??? first???

I think I own figured out the unflawed firearm control policy.?

A license must be obtained by endorsement a background check, some type of mental conditioning to ensure that contained by a dangerous situation the creature will not shoot anyone that shouldn't be, accuracy, etc. Upon endorsement the tests and getting the license the party will have no restrictions on firearms and be allowed to pass concealed. To acquire and operate full autos, the person must bring appropriate training, sort of an add-on to the license. Then, the creature would have no restrictions on buying and operating them... Update license every two years. Basically a system ensure that a person who is incompetent near firearms, mentally unstable, homicidal/suicidal, etc will not be allowed to legally return with firearms, while the people who will use them responsibly and rightfully can. I know that this is probably flawed as hell, missing a lot of celebrated parts, and I'll catch a ton of flak... But speak about me what you think anyway.
Answers: If the constitution did not guarantee the right to carry arms, then this would be a pretty right starting point.
it sound great written, but people other find a way around the rules.

i prefer the method of gun control devised by none except Chris Rock:
make respectively bullet cost $5000. then nobody could afford to shoot someone

or here's a world-shattering solution: NO GUNS!!!

sure knife crimes would move about up, but then at smallest you have to do your butchery in party, instead of long distance
If various government (including govts in the US and Canada) have not used registration and license schemes within the recent past as a precursor for confiscating firearms you might enjoy a point.

If the Constitution and natural rights did not guarantee the right to possess and use firearms you might hold a point.

But since time and time again licensing and registration scheme have be used by corrupt dictators to commit mayhem and ill-treat their subjects (Zimbabwe, Nazi Germany, USSR, South Africa, Jim Crow South etc, etc etc), I am very leery of "reasonable" restrictions.
1 - not a soul is trying to confiscate your weapons... its a right-wing MYTH.

2 - The problem is not license or background checks. There are simply TOO MANY GUNS OUT THERE. Millions of firearms are made within this country, and millions more overseas and in Canada every year. There is a flood within the market. Guns bought and sold on the street are much cheaper than the ones sold surrounded by stores. Pimps, theives, Crack and Meth dealers and killer dont get permit to buy their guns. They trade them for heroin, crack, meth, chopped cars and women shipped across the international borders forced into sex slavery.

3. There is no need for automatic armaments! If there is, than why stop in attendance. Some people purloin the second amendment to mean I hold a write bare adjectives arms. Does this include walking down the street with grenades, anti-tank missles, long swords, brass-knuckles and flame throwers. "I penny-pinching what the big deal? I can hit the smudge everytime!"

3b. All those psych exams would take FOREVER. And, psych exams are extremely arbitray. I dont think at hand should be a psych exam to determine if you have a gun. I dream up thousands, if not millions, of law-abiding citizens would backfire who have verbs criminal backgrounds are completely able of owning a firearm.

4. You would have an awesome model, if there be no guns out there and we be just hand them out for the first time. But, you're suggestions do little for the 250-375,000,000 guns out there contained by the USA today.

Do you have a attorney? How do you hire one?

I hear some people on tv proverb, "I'll just name my lawyer."Do nation really just hold lawyers on foot or is that for the extremely wealthy?
Answers: Here is an article call "How to Find Legal Help When You Can't Afford It"

http://www.courtreference.com/court-refe...

It has online resources for every state, including legitimate information and organizations that grant free and low-cost legal assistance. It also explains the multiple ways that people can carry legal assistance from attorneys short having to spend greatly of money.
I consider it a figure of expression at this point, but culture do have lawyer on retainer, where you compensate them monthly to be available to you if the need arise, and you are a priority to that attorney, as dead set against being represented by an associate partner. Most population do not need a advocate at our beck and call.

Do i have a satchel?!?!?

I was wondering i really hurt my leg wich cause me not been competent too work im a stand up comic and cant do one of my tours wich would have made me lots, i hurt my leg contained by a very big nation general company i slipt on a wet floor at hand was no sign no zilch so do i have a suitcase to sue them and how long do case's usally take to be resolved??
Answers: It depends on your local law. Some places settle claims via arbitration, some utilize the traditional courts. I've always have my reasons for second guessing arbitration, because the arbitrator is usually chosen by the corporation (or defendant). This I believe creates a bias in favor of the defendant, for observable reasons. In a grip like yours though, I wouldn't be surprised if they settled out of court, especially if you enjoy witnesses that could verify the circumstances.
Probably not.

1. Were there witnesses?
2. Was an ambulance call?
3. Did you immediately stir to the doctor?
4. Do you have any evidence that supports that your leg injury is directly related to this dive?

The burden of proof is on you, so if you pursue this, be prepared to have adjectives of the above--and more. Also, if you have any sort of financial issues, the defense will use this as your motivation to sue.
While technically yes, you enjoy a case, it could be terrifically hard to win a settlement for a couple reason:

1. Was there an luck report done at the time of your accident complete next to pictures of where your drip happened? Without this, within is not documentation that you even fell and what the conditions of the fall be.

2. The company in which you fell can claim that technically, your leak is not impairing your work since you do not necessitate to "stand up" do to your job. (remember, we are dealing next to the law here and technically you don't enjoy to use your legs to earn an income in your field).

3. Did anyone witness the drop and if so, would they be willing to testify on your behalf?

In regard to time, if could take as much as 2-3 years since you ever saw a dime from the company based on the docket of the court contained by your area and the appeals process.
Sounds approaching a crap shoot if your going for compensation for loosing money on the missed tour but you could probably get medical bills covered, you would own to prove that there be no way at adjectives that you could have made the tour as economically as showing that you made every effort to produce the tour. Couldn't perform from a rudder chair? I could see a total new routine stemming from the incident. Good luck. It's surrounded by the hands of the jury and the ceremony of all party who take the stand!

Are laws that protect ethnic group from themselves justified?

Laws, such as form belt laws and helmet law, are designed to protect people essentially from themselves. Do you surmise that these laws are fit? If so, why? If you think these law are not justified, afterwards please state why you think they are not fit.
Answers: Actually, I agree. But there should be some consequence of movement as well. For example, if a motorcyclist chose not to wear a helmet, and be involved in an catastrophe, if they received a head injury, near should be absolutely no insurance compensation for them at adjectives. If a person within a car is kill in an disaster and chose not to wear a seatbelt, it should be included as an exclusion in duration, accident, and disability insurance.
You want to play, you get to pay.
"Rightful sovereignty is unobstructed action according to our will inwardly limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not affix 'within the limits of the law' because tenet is often but the tyrant's will, and other so when it violates the rights of the individual."
~Thomas Jefferson
No. I don't believe we can top Thomas Jefferson because he was deceased on. That said though, there is a maxim that 'my rights end where on earth your nose begins'. If you do not spoil other people, you are still inside your right to do what you'd like.
The reality that they made it to law justify them.
No I don't think so. Personal Liberty is TRUE. If that liberty is used to get poor decisions, later so be it. There are many folks who can't handle constant freedoms. Unfortunately, the government uses this minority to kind laws that restrict everyone.

Common sense cannot be legislated
Unlike tons other countries, our constitution gives us personal sovereignty. I believe that it was further amended contained by 1868 to make it impossible for states to infringe on our personal liberty. Our bodies are our own personal property and we were granted inalienable rights to do doesn`t matter what we want with them. In other words, we said that we control ourselves and that no establishment has given us this right. Other countries constitutions are different. In their covering, it’s the government giving them the right, bah, I’m not nearly smart ample to answer this… I can’t read about our rights because the more I read, the angrier I catch! I want my freedom and liberty pay for! I’m sick of tyrants treating the Constitution like it’s a mere piece of rag!

If you’re not angry about this, you any have greatly of patients, you’re probably a tyrant, or a you’re most likely a sheep.

Passing law to protect and individual from themselves is a blatant violation of the constitution!
No, I believe that as an grown (over the age of 18) I can make my own decision, good or desperate as they might be. I do believe that I should be made to make sure that children are protected, as they don't twig what could happen. I would similar to to see a law prohibiting smoking contained by a car beside children in it, as even if they protest smoking parents don't give the impression of being to care. suitable question, Star !

Law question.?

What happen if you accidently downloaded something illegal beside out knowing what it was?
Do the police still come kicking down the door or do they look for a particular amount of times the file is downloaded?
Answers: 1) It's across the world not the police who come knocking, it's a subpoena from the RIAA.
2) to date, I know of no instances where on earth a single questionable download has prompted any unsolicited visit of this type. The RIAA goes after volume downloaders - the ones who download thousands of prohibited files, as well as uploading files criminally.
One song or film would not organize to trouble. Those got trouble because they illegitimately downloaded more than a thousand.

If you did not ditribute that accidental folder in any form and delete it directly, you would be OK.
Some places you are legally obligated to report such things to the law.

Mostly, its only just a good perception to ban the server from your web, purge the offending material, and try to avoid it within the future.

Girls Gone Wild?

The CEO of GGW was arrested because his crew be taping two girls have sex on a bathroom. The only problem be that the two girls were minors but next to fake IDs, so my sound out is:

Should the CEO of GGW or the two girls be arrested that night?
Answers: Why the hell be the crew taping surrounded by the BATHROOM?! Sounds like voyeurism to me, as for the girls, they nouns like a couple of low-life skanks
if truth be told didn't he get arrested for due evasion?

Can He Take My Car Away?

Okay so my partner bought a car two years ago. it be in my baptize for 6 onths before he forged my signature to take it into his name. Then he give it back. Now he is blackmailing me holding the saloon against me, you will never be able to donate, the car is mine I compensated for it.

It has be in my heading for two years now unless he's forged again. I am within the UK what are the laws? He rewarded all of it rotten in one be in motion and then simply gave it me, a event of signing the car over. I salaried him nothing. What are my rights next to this car immediately?
Answers: The details are rather sketchy. Forgery is an indignation in itself. Whoever have paid for it have a claim for it. If it has be presented to you, by him, he cannot take it stern, without your consent. Whatever be the facts, he cannot blackmail you and capture away with it. You may lodge a complaint.
Well I know here within the US there's a saying that "possession is 9/10th's of the law". So if you own possession of the vehicle, and it's in your first name, it's yours legally. He wouldn't enjoy a leg to stand on. And forgery (if I'm not mistaken) is a rather serious federal offense. If he have forged your signature, and you can prove it, (which there are experts that can verify it) he could be facing some incarceration.

More Questions and Answers:
[856] - [2360] - [1762] - [1502] - [2089] - [1434] - [1140] - [399] - [2536] - [946] - [1769] - [30] - [1204] - [81] - [277] - [1] - [1028] - [2] - [838] - [1182]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: