Law Questions and Answers

Help what can i do if i can not attend a hearing specifically out of state?

hi i just received make out for a hearing surrounded by family court within the state of florida i live in ny and it is a week away i simply cannot attend surrounded by person or telephonically
Answers: They should agree to you call contained by for that... Borrow someone's phone if you don't have one.
One week is prob not adequate time to reschedule. There should be no reason you couldn't do this over the phone. If you don't contract with it, you will enjoy a warrant for your arrest.

Can a vote of no confidence be imposed upon a planning board? How?

The planning board in my town is full of developers, primarily. It is in their best interest to vote on what make them the most money and they basically do.

My interview is this - a couple of weeks ago our town voted against a rezoning of land surrounded by our neighborhood. Immediately, the owner of the trust reapplied for the exact same rezoning request. I have a reaction that the planning board is just going to reapprove it as in the past, and it is going to be revoted on in a town seminar.

Considering we have already voted against it, what can be done to generate sure it doesn't even get that far again? Can a vote of no confidence be imposed on the planning board and obtain them fired or something for performing in their own interests and not the town? I aim, this was already denied!

This is Massachusetts by the road.
Answers: Depends on the laws of your town. There is no "vote of no confidence", but see if in attendance is some sort of recall procedure.

Parent and custody question..tremendously different?

First, my parents got custody of my son when i be 16. i was obviously upset but i had no choice. No position, no car and no robustness ins. It is 4 years later and i am trying to bring in it. I have a full time commission, car, vigour ins. and i am going to college. I need give support to with money and my paretns wont backing. His father wont help. And i cant embezzle his father to court because my parents have custody. I cant bring back government help out because my parents have custody. WHAT DO I DO? what are my option? Please someone help!
Answers: What do you do? - Get a errand. Get two if one is not doing it. Finish college. Get a better job. Then verbs about custody. Sounds close to your son is where he wants to be.

From the way you worded the interrogate you are only seeking custody for money. That is the WRONG defence.
Worry about YOU!! sounds close to you just want custody so you will own money ????thats not the best interest of the child.Worry about you and afford him all the love you can.you deserve nought.
been in that ...raising grandchild.
Get a GOOD attorney, and progress to court to fight for custody over your son. Custody is a long-winded and frustrating process, and in the running out might not benefit you, but it's worth it. Also try seeking an attorney doing Pro Bono work (free). Also be prepared to make a statement in the order of how you've gotten your life together, and how you're going to college to engender something of yourself, and how you plan to efficiently support you son if you be to get custody.
Do you want your son put money on, or do you just want financial serve?
If you are truly "trying to make it", surely your parents will see that and respond positively, but it will give somebody a lift a great deal of crack on your part to earn vertebrae their trust and respect.

Take responsibility for the choices you have made--"I have no choice". Yes, you did. You had the choice to linger to have sex until you be in a position to bump up a child, and ideally with someone you be married to who would be there as a parent as resourcefully. Don't blame your parents for trying to rescue your son from that bad situation and product the best of it.

At this point from what I can gather, you would spawn a much better "aunt" to your son than you would a mom. Focus on that and continue getting your existence straight instead of having your mitt out and trying to get everyone to within effect reward you for your mistakes.
It's an uphill battle for you. You will own to show how it is in the best interests of the child that custody be returned to you. In most states, your alter of circumstances are not sufficient to change custody from your parents to you. You will requirement to show how the custodian's or child's circumstances have changed and how that conveyance makes it surrounded by the child's best interest to be in your custody.

Legal aid from your nouns may be able to assist.
Continue your teaching, graduate...then turn out and make a worthwhile life span.then verbs about custody.

Right in a minute, you are in no position to pinch care of a child.

I have a interrogate: Why?

Why?
Answers: Because
what do u think!!!?????????

When US is saying that countries are torturing family in jail isnt that what they are doing in Guantanamo Bay

even report reporters are held there and they are economically tortured and ripped off the details. but when any other country does such a act they are treated resembling the have get horns on their head is america superior that they draw from the power to torture and harm populace.
Answers: US abuses of human rights don't count, everyone know that. Nobody cares within the outside if a prisoner in Guantanamo sound was kidnap from Europe and put on a CIA flight, anymore than they care roughly black Texans being on extermination row because their lawyer fell asleep.
Yes, but it's ok in that....
Guantanamo Bay isn't part of the US.
I don't dispute your commentary, but what exactly is your cross-question?
Gitmo isn't in the USA.
No.
you won't really make out until you've experienced it
The "torture" that is perform there is a banter - loud music and lack of sleep compared to have car battery attached to your testicles, having your wife and daughter raped within front of you and then one shot or hung as in the Middle East and other areas.
From adjectives indications, the U.S. does torture peope and has unknown numbers of undercover prisons. Other nationalities consider us barbarians.
Get tangible. Guantanamo is like a resort for these f***s. They achieve there own room, three meal a day, their own Koran. They take to pray. Sadam had legitimate torture rooms (and rape rooms). Quit watching CNN.
It is a controversial issue. You might want to visit leader sites like local representative. You might want to register to vote.
When you say aloud US. you mean American citizens right? So you have it in mind me? right? Go **** youself. I ain't got nothin' to do next to nothin. Why don't people surrounded by your country **** off!
They aren't individual tortured at Guantanamo Bay.
Don't be ignorant. We don't verbs off peoples fingernails, staple their testicles to a chair, and de-capitate them near a rusty saw blade. That is just one picture from Saddam's personal underground room. Don't confuse aggressive interogation beside torture. If you want to truly compare us to the brutality of tribal behavior in the middle east, you deserve what they make a contribution you.
What is torture? Wearing underwear on your head? I have to do that in convoy boot camp.What a bunch of wimps. When you commit terrorists act, consider the consequences.

We are interrogating enemies of the U.S. They are anyone treated much more fairly than the victims of 9-11.
yes, but within quantanamo bay, they are torturing the race who are unlawful enemy combatants, determined to motive serious harm and suffering towards as heaps people as they can. Now within other countries, prisoners are tortured because of the name they give a teddy suffer.

Do you see the difference??? Did you know that Sadam had every athelete on his Olympic troop tortured for not performing better???
The EU Human Rights Commissioner has investigated Gitmo and determined that the prisoners within get better treatment than prisoners surrounded by European prisons.

The claims of torture at Gitmo are propaganda from cowards.

In fact anybody who believes or repeats those claims is a both a coward and a 'useful idiot.' It is cheap and jammy to accuse culture of criminal acts when you know that they are bound by vagueness rules and as a result cannot defend themselves.

And I bet you claim to "support the troops" - right?
If you are a Fascist & intolerent of anything outwith your
culture ,similar to say Bush & adjectives of his minions , you may torture,maime,kill women & children,verbs economies &
terrorise small countries as long as you call for them terrorists &
claim god is on your side whilst ignoring Global Warming(cause his God will fix it) & TRUE Totataliterian dictators like
Mugabe
surrounded by response to some other answers you're getting, the people man held in GB enjoy yet to be charged beside any crime, so why are they being held exactly? - havent u wondered?
If a policeman come and arrested you, stuck u in incarcerate and held u there for 5 years (as is the defence with some population being held there) minus ever bringing any charges, and not allowing anyone to visit you,would u reflect that fair?
The certainty that some people chew over its ok for the US to do it, because Saddam has done much worse is a stupid argument,as these totally same people will probably laud the US military for bringing his torturous reign to an failure...what makes it ok when injustices happen in your own backyard. Yes GB may be within cuba, but its a US military base.
And its stupid and unrealistic to think that the race held there are technically treated, as investigations have proved otherwise.

"officer investigations have revealed interrogation technique and detention conditions that clearly violate the international prohibition on torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment" - a quote from amnesty international
You are sitting at home, having a muffled time with your spouse. The children are surrounded by the den playing video games.
Three men break into your house, rape the wife, torture the children to death within front of you, leave you tied up and burn you alive within the house.

You want to athorities to do what:

A) Punish the perps
B) Reward them

It seems to me that you hold chosen option B.

Next request for information: all of you that are against the period of war, against the treatment of the Guantanomo Bay jailees, why do you condone ABORTIONS (MURDER OF THE INNOCENT), why do you condone murder on the highways (40,000 - 50,000 die needlessly respectively and every year, for more than half a century now); why do you condone murder by doctor (the number 1, #2, and #3 cause of death surrounded by American now, IAW CBS News)?

Does this net sense? It doesn't to me.

While I do not condone torture at any time, I would prefer to be safe inwardly my own home. If people are not out of danger at home, there is no choice, no freedom left.
No. Not impossible to tell apart thing.

First, the prisoners at Gitmo be captured surrounded by a war zone and identified as undemocratic combatants. The people contained by other countries were jailed by their administration for alleged crimes. Prisoners of the Criminal justice system are accorded highly specific rights. Illegal combatants are not accorded rights.

Second, just because YOU ring up some aggressive interrogation techniques "torture" does not if truth be told make them so. The international definition, per treaties, is "severe cramp or suffering, mental or physical". Per Geneva, illegal combatants are NOT protected from interrogation, and they've never be given the same protections that prisoners of a criminal sprite system have. In reality, per Geneva, they could have be executed upon being capture.

Third, the torture of the people we're trying to protect does rise to the horizontal of torture. They're physically assaulted, they're deprived of hygenic conditions, they're deprived of decent provisions, they don't receive needed medical treatment, etc. These are adjectives contrary to basic human rights for prisoners of the criminal equality system, and should be rightly condemned.

You're trying to equate two things which are clearly completely different. Your attempt falls apart when faced next to specifics and facts of the situations.
No one knows what is or isn't going on there - lone speculation.

But you are missing the bigger and more important issue explicitly easier to prove or disprove anyway, and that is that the detain itself and the processes for justice afforded its prisoners represents the stretching of our LEGAL principles as embodied contained by the Constitution to and arguably beyond the breaking point.

Longstanding principles that have served us in good health have unilaterally be tossed aside for daily exigencies, at a illustrious cost to the principles themselves and the respect of citizens and non-citizens of the US of and for its principles.

focus your outrage on educating citizens about what rights they own lost, and what the cost is both in our own country, and surrounded by the eyes of the world.

200+ years of good will tossed down the drain for what?
yes,chill out...

What is a peremptory challenge?

Answers: It is the right to treat with contempt a juror for "no cause." You can other challenge a juror because he/she may be biased, but for a peremptory rebel, you do not need a point. In my state, there is a similar process for bench called "excusal." Here, respectively party can excuse one peacemaker in state court for no stated rationale. However, I think your sound out is related to selecting a jury. The number of peremptory challenge for each f¨ēte probably varies from state to state. In my state, respectively individual in a casing gets 6 peremptory challenge.

Can someone with HIV work surrounded by the food industry, as a cook in a restaurant, or bakery for instance?

I'm chitchat legally. If someone know they are hiv+, is it legal for them to work contained by this industry? I know I sound in the dark asking this, but I've always wondered this. I hold a friend that is hiv+ and he requirements to pursue being a chef. Please provide a connect to the basis of your answer. (i.e. the correlation to a law website, or state statutes) I've not found the answer online as of on the other hand. Thanks
Answers: There is currently no restriction(s) preventing an individual that is HIV+ from working within the food industry as a food handler (aka Chef).

Additionally, employers cannot junk employment to an individual that is HIV+. It is a form of nouns and punishable by law.
I would assume so since any refusal to hire on such grounds would be a betrayal of the American with Disabilities Act. Not positive though.

How would they know if he be anyway? It's not like they can ask that request for information on an application nor can that info be provided without a court command.
Thats illegal hehe sorry besides im sure a personality with hiv isnt so stupid as to cut themselves or somethin and it get on the food to not throw it away.

Name the world's most evil men and women.?

PAST, PRESENT AND NOW. GO!
Answers: Hitler, Hillary Clinton...
Bill and Hilary Clinton? Pol Pot? Stalin? Hitler? Nancy Pelosi?

At that level of evil, it's kinda unnecessary to try to place just "how" evil they respectively are.

Richard
Adolf Hitler and Eva Braun

And to any joker who mentions Bush:
Bin Laden is far worse!
On the men's side... Dick Cheney
On the women's side...the tardy Leona Helmsley
Men: Hitler and bin Laden
Women: All 3 billion of them
social workers
George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Condeleeza Rice, Hilary Clinton, Oprah Winfrey, Hitler, Lyndon Johnson, Osama Bin Laden

Can you call the police to remove a beggar from your house that will not leave?

I hold a major problem near one of my brother's friends! He's been at our house for days gone by 2 months straight nearly. I've told him nicely to walk off but he came posterior again! The question is can I beckon the police to remove his a$s from my house? Could I get a restraining proclaim??
Answers: your mom would have to be the one to telephone the police, since it is her house.they will come and take him away, and alert him not to come back, but i give attention to in demand to get a restraining direct, there have to be some sort of threat..
Does your brother live there too? If he does later he has as much right as you to invite someone contained by, and the cops will not get involved.

Richard
Yes, you can phone call the police and advise them that you own an unwanted subject. They will come and ask him/her to leave, if the vagabond continues to come back he can be arrested if the police choose too.

You can win a restraining order, but they are difficult to enforce. Let's utter you have one and you phone the police, and he takes rotten before the police arrive they can't do anything going on for it.

It's unclear as to whether or not this guy lives at the house surrounded by question. If he have lived there more than 30 days, you will own to evict him through the courts and serve them with an eviction sense, best of luck.

Why should abortion rights be protected?

Opinions
Answers: Abortion - generally isn't murder. Geez, capture a grip all you religious nuts! A existence isn't a life in the past its viable. Now if you were to abort at 9 months, i.e. probably murder. At 2 months? No. A clump of cells is not a babe in any means of access you look at it. What people stipulation to realize is that abortion will NEVER stop. And is it better to have a not dangerous and sanitary medical procedure, or go rear to coat hanger days? Abortion #'s are going down - but better sex education and information on morals and values from parents will abet make the #'s run down even more. But even with tuition, the practice will never stop.

What needs to be outlawed is holier-than-thou family who claim to protect the unborn, but refuse to back the already born through their tax dollars or their votes to bring soldiers home. Pro-life? A bunch of hypocritical crap until you support ALL children beside medical care and and bring ALL soldiers home to protect those inside our borders. Until you're willing to spend your toll dollars doing those things, I don't think you should christen yourself "Pro-Life".
I don't think it's a dutiful excuse to say, fetus isn't a human. It is, and adjectives in adjectives I don't think abortion is well-mannered thing or should at tiniest be avoided if possible. But I also believe a discussion in the order of it can't be black and white, 'cause in the wrapping up everybody has the right to opt about their own body. And it merely so happens that until born, a newborn is a part of it's mother's body and no woman should be taken the right to wish about it. It's a morally tough edict for any woman I believe she'll have to live near it for the rest of her life. But no man should hold the right to look down to a woman that does it. If nothing else, he'll never fully take in and take responsibility for it the method a woman has to. So let's hand down this decision to women.
I do hope that women use this freedom beside at most care and by perfect judgment of whether it's essential or not...
1. Because no one can FORCE a woman to afford birth.
2. Because a woman has the right to net decisions concerning HER body.
3. Because legitimate abortions are performed contained by a sterile, sanitary and safe environment. Before Roe V Wade, women who didn't want to provide birth had to resort to vertebrae alley butchers or attempts at self abortion near coat hangers, knit needs, poisions and other fatal ways. Millions of women died as the result.

Should Roe v Wade every be overturned, women would once again be relegated to the back alleys.
Murder is not a right, it's a crime and should not be protected!!!!!

Abortion=Murder
They shouldn't abortion is murder.

More Questions and Answers:
[2175] - [689] - [298] - [1885] - [954] - [1983] - [387] - [1824] - [1569] - [2485] - [487] - [2067] - [615] - [484] - [1050] - [1269] - [491] - [2238] - [1279] - [65]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: