Law Questions and Answers

What is the fine for Failed to Keep Right in NY?

Got across an intersection contained by an unfamiliar neighborhood and couldn't see the lines and i be in the wrong lane and speedily fixed my mistake but had a state trooper trailing me. Whats the fine in NY?
Answers: It doesn't event if you're guilty or innocent, if you get a ticket within New York, you must pay. If you contest the ticket, the establishment will send you a fine for $32. If you don't contest the ticket, you income whatever the policeman wrote, which could be anywhere from $40 to $120.

My patio be partially removed while the neighbor subsequent door was building their house. What rights do I hold?

I own part of a property that used to be 1 component but was split into 2. My house on one side and the other side be just a garden. There be a common tile porch that extended from my lot into the other lot. The other lot was purchased and they are presently building a house on this lot. Some of the tiles were removed to put surrounded by a retaining wall along the lot line and because of the irregular outline (not in a straight line) within are parts of my patio that are very soon missing along the edge. My cross-question is do I have the right to request that this be fixed by the neighbor or is the repair on me? Are near any real estate imperative articles I can reference? My property is within Alameda County in California.
Answers: Your push button word is that you own part of the property and it's a adjectives tile patio. Is your ground surveyed as it should be and staked out? That would tell you exactly where on earth your property is and isn't. I do that before trying anything else...as that should confer you the answer. If you don't own that part, afterwards you have no rights to it. No reputable builder would build on your property. They would hold to have the property survey and staked out contained by order to build.. A retaining wall or even a paling that's on the lot line is adjectives between two properties and permission from the building inspector and possibly going to a debate about a variance would be within order. I am generalize because I live in a different state. I would walk down to the library and find the lot and block number and make sure that your rights aren't without being seen. In the state of New Jersey, where I live, adjectives lines on the property lines should be agreed upon and done legally. I have to ask my neighbor if I could put up a fence on the property strip. Like I said, go down and procure the block and lot number and look up the deeds records. The municipal building or the courts should own this info. Does this , in any road, pose a problem for you.such as flooding, obstructing your spectacle, etc.? Take pictures at all stages contained by case there's a breach of contract here. Good luck.

Are Freemasons in America on a massive recuitment drive beside their "ask a Mason to join" campaign?

Considering that once a personality has undertake the Masonic Oath it is then considered improper for him/her to seek further understanding beyond their current Masonic status, should prospective candidates be sure to research adjectives the aspects of all degees and obligation soundly before venture unto an unredeemable Oath against their lives, which they might later regret?
Answers: they must be within panic beside all the outing they're getting on the lattice.

Freemasonry is Satanic but the lower degrees are not tolerate in on this reality , instead they are duped into believing it is non-sectarian.
At it's highest smooth it shares the goal s of the NWO which is exterminate 5.5 billions of the world population and to bind the survivors after the wars, famine depressions and epidemics they plan for us all.

The Scottish rite within particular is controlled directly by the Rothschilds who are the chief organizer of the conspiracy.
Freemasonry is a global fraternity, who do NOT conscript. The "to be one ask one" is in reality the only track inwhich to become a Freemason, you cannot be invited.

Freemasonry uses role plays to demonstrate and teach moral values, and as a coaching process it is progressive. With it being progressive it is fundamental, close to any teaching method, to swot up in stages. In example, you don't cram to run before you know how to tramp, you wont teach a child to dive, back they can actually swim etc

It is done to prevent confusion, mis-understanding and back the Freemason on his road through Freemasonry. It is not done for any detrimental reason, nor to covering or conceal for malicious purpose.

Freemasonry encourages those who want entry to learn around Freemasonry before they fix together, a new petitioner will touch with member of the lodge to ask questions and seize answers about anything they yearning to know, they will then join with a committee of existing member, again to ask questions and obtain answers. Only after this, and once the lodge is sure the requesting petitioner is fully aware of what membership entail, will his petition proceed.

It is not exactly considered innappropriate to seek further practice, but is deemed better for the candidate not to know everything, or the exact process as the methods used with the role plays etc relies on surprise, attention to detail, and supervision from the candidates perspective.

Try to look at it from an alternate perspective... I'll try a couple to see if it help...

If you were using a study book to revise for your exams, but read the answers slice at the back first. You would not concentrate so much on the comings and goings, which is what the book uses to help you remember the process which is what you necessitate to pass your exam, but to some extent your memory for the answer for that question.

You buy a detective, who dunnit, book but read the end chapter first. Would you pay as much attention to detail when you read the book from the launch, would you notice the clues that reveal the criminal if you already know who it is, would you bother to really read the book at adjectives etc etc

Hope that helps, but consistency free to ask another question or dispatch them direct to me via my Answers profile.
ugh...Thanks to Bondi for offering a response to this mostly unintelligeble question.

Freemasonry is adjectives about seeking further experience, this is not 'inappropriate'...

The Oaths/Obligations are symbolic...if someone becomes a mason and after decides its not for them, they simply demit (quit)...not a soul has ever be harmed for telling the "secrets" of freemasonry.

to some other responses:

* here is no panic surrounded by freemasonry, there is also no "outing" on the lattice - just anti-mason lies. adjectives the truth about freemasonry have been available, within their own documents for over 300 years - and you can find them all online at actual masonic sites too...

* don't believe the junk about satan worship (from two sources 1) the taxil hoax (note it say HOAX, as in admit to be a lie by Leo Taxil, the guy who started it) and 2) uninformed pseudo-intellectuals who know nothing of literary history and linguistics

* near is NO new world command conspiracy in freemasonry at adjectives, more tin hat paranoia

* not a soul person or group controls any item of freemasonry or co-masonry (the York and Scottish rites are not a part of Freemasonry proper but are appendant bodies; they are not controlled by any one group, character, family.)
I thought this be going to be a fair and in proportion question, but it turns out that the details of the examine is the stating of an opinion which is not base on any fact whatsoever.

I do not believe any answer besides a skewed performance of reality is going to acquire very far near you. Appropriate and correct answers have already be posted by other Masons, so I will refer theirs to you for consideration. They have put into words what I am sense.

When we lawyers founded? And how tons years do they go to arts school?

I have a audition and I need these answers
Answers: Lawyers move about to school for 3 years. I believe lawyer have be around for a very long time. Check wikipedia.

What is the charge?

Two buddies( A&B) drinking inside the home of A. When they were already intoxicated, A get up and open one of the drawer inside the room, it turn out it is a .38 Smith&Wesson colt pistol, he put one bullet contained by it, and said to his buddy B to play a russian roulette with him. B said that it is too unsafe 'I do not want to get hurt nor i want someone to attain hurt by these'. Then A said to him ' do not worry i put blank bullet instead of a live one' but due to his drunkeness he couldn't even integer out if it is live or blank. His father is a cop working when that time occured. B is still hesitate to even hold or even play the roulette. But A pleased him, it is perfectly secure nothing to worried more or less. A click the trigger nothing come about, gives the gun to B, he also does the same zilch happen. The second time A click it the bullet hit his temple & blood adjectives over the place, B rush A to the hospital. Is B guilty of the charge of murder? I will defend B.
Answers: no. in that are no murder charges here. B picked up the gun and pulled the trigger.

It's no difference is someone saying, "Hey, hold this pill. It will feel good" and consequently they die of a reaction. They are responsible for making their own judgment, unless it was underneath duress.

Or if a passenger in a motor says, "Just run the red oil lamp, you can make it!" Come on, the driver made the stupid conclusion, sad or not.

If within are any charges it would be whether or not the the firearm was registered correctly. Now B's family unit can try to file a civil suit and voice that the gun was not kept out of get or "children" or something.

You don't need to save from harm anyone. You need to testify to the truth and not purger yourself contained by court. You simply tell the truth to the best of your recollection. If you be drunk then your nouns could be discredidit anyway.

The prosecution might try to say that it be murder, and that B did not pull the trigger, to some extent he was shot. And you guys be trying to cover something up. So be truthful or you will chase your own tail. But they will have to prove beyond a shodow of a doubt surrounded by any criminal case, regardless of charges.

This is for sure not a case of criminal negligence. Negligence is single argued if someone was aware of a problem and still allowed the circumstances to lug place despite the knowledge of a possible calamity. For example, if a rotten beam falls on your director, you can't scream negligence unelss you can prove that someone have said to them, "You need to fix that, as it could hurt someone." Once the individual is aware, then they know better and chose not to act on a potentially harmful situarion.
I am not a lawyer but I would resembling to make a guess. In my view, B is not guilty or can be charged for murder for the simple reason that he did not destroy A. It was A himself who clicked the trigger of the gun. Another point is that there is no aggravating circumstances surrounded by the situation. There is no evident premeditation.

Who has more court rights to a child in australia?

hi i am from australia and of late wondering who has more legally recognized rights,me(mum) or my partner,we are still together but live separetly,i have read on a few sites that father have no permissible rights unless you register them for rights, my child isnt in any mar from any of us but i feel similar to my son is being taken away from me..
p.s my sons nan on my side and me is upset because she doesnt see him much due to his other nan taking him out everywhere.
Answers: Amendments to the Family Law Act surrounded by 2006 included the following: "children have the right to know and be care for by both their parents, regardless of whether their parents are married, separated, have never married or own never lived together" (s.60B(2)(a)) and "children have a right to spend time on a regular argument with, and communicate on a regular principle with, both their parents and other race significant to their care, welfare and nouns (such as grandparents and other relatives)" (s.60B(2)(b)).

In other words, the starting presumption is that both parents have equal rights - I enjoy no idea where on earth you could have read such completely false information as you own stated - are you sure they were chitchat about Australia?

The Family Court's website used to enjoy a link to command a brochure called "Children and Separation: A guide for parents" but the website very soon states that: "The Attorney-General's Department will now provide copies of these booklets which you can land by calling National Mail and Marketing on 1800 114 393.
".
ok no one have rights
the child is a person
what is best for the child is what the courts will support
prove its best for the child and you win
If you hold custody why are you letting his other nan take him out so much? Limit her to once a week and permit your Mum see him.
How can you allow others to do what THEY want...he's your son...not theirs.
In south Africa the biological father had no rights to the child where on earth the father and mother were not married. she could even tolerate the child be adopted short the father having a read out. But he had to foot maintenance. Fortunately our law changed 3 or 4 years ago and now the unmarried biological father have the same rights as the mother. If he can proof that he is a better parent than her a court will award him sole custody NB even if he and the mother have never been married. I deliberate Australia has indistinguishable laws as us on that subject. Both directive systems are based on the British one.

Does someone knows something just about the street thug criminals?

it's a gang from idon't know where...
Answers: stc is intricate core!

Can you see a barrister without first seeing a solicitor, UK?

Answers: Hi, judge by your questions this must be an issue that you get the impression really strongly about. I option you all the best as aggression the establishment is never easy. Read this extract from the join below and I hope it answers your enquiry x

A barrister is a legal representative found in various common decree jurisdictions which draw on a split profession (as opposed to a fused profession) within relation to legal representation. In split professions, the other type of legal representative is the solicitor. Solicitors have more direct contact next to the clients, whereas barristers often lone become involved in a defence in directive to provide any advocacy needed by the client. Barristers are also engaged by solicitors to provide specialist guidance on points of law. Barristers are not often, if ever, instructed by clients directly. Instead, the client's solicitors will instruct a barrister on behalf of the client when appropriate.

The historical difference between the two professions -- and the only essential difference surrounded by England and Wales today -- is that a solicitor is an attorney, which means they stand within the place of their client for legal purposes, and may conduct litigation by making applications to the court, writing packages in litigation to the client's antagonist and so on. A barrister is not an attorney and is forbidden, both by law and by professional rules, from conducting litigation. This difference surrounded by function explains many of the practical differences between the two professions.
You can contained by theory, but few barristers will agree to see you unless you own a solicitor or some kind of legitimate advocate instructed.
Why do you stipulation to just see a barrister? Honestly I can't ruminate of a situation where someone might requirement to go straight to a barrister - unless you hold the case totally properly prepared and one and only need someone to represent you at court.
yes but it will cost greatly more to start. you may find you will be sent to the solicitor first anyway.

they have protocols they operate below. they don't like ignore them
If you have a seven integer sum in the dune maybe.
You own to go to a see a Solicitor who later refers you to a barrister if he thinks it is right.Barrister are very much within demand and if you do return with an appointment it will be with his
so call subordinate then when adjectives your suppositions
are taken,then you see the barrister for a jiffy.
The practical answer to your question is yes, but simply if they undertake direct access work and are thereby licensed to run work on a direct access basis.
The barrister you may will to sue therefore have to have such a license AND practice within the area of directive in which you decision to instruct him/her.
The Bar Council has a directory of barristers who attempt direct access work and that should be your first port of call.

Edit: sorry - SUE is simply a typo for USE. A Freudian slip, possibly. No need to carry so antsy about a typo
It is possible but it will cost seriously of money. Barristers fees are in excess of lb500.00 per hour.
Look up the Law Society and confer them a 'phone, they are very sympathetic and will steer you in the right direction.
Could you not find a different solicitor(one that will listen?)
There are, as JZD have pointed out, a few barristers allowing direct access, but the vast majority hold to be approached via a solicitor. One advantage which may not enjoy struck you about this system is that while you don't know anything give or take a few the kind of barrister you want and who's honourable for your case and who would be disastrous, the solicitor should be within a position to pick the right one. It is therefore especially important for you first to choose the right solicitor (someone specialising contained by the appropriate field) who will, by the very humour of things, tend to know the barristers who would represent you well and who is conversant next to that branch of the law. You appear to have made up your mind already that you will inevitability a barrister. This may not necessarily be the case. But the best personage to advise as a first step is a solicitor, who will after point you in the right direction.
You hold to see a solicitor first and he will refer the matter to a Barrister. That is how it works.no shortcuts.!!

Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen?

6. law is the expression of the nonspecific will. Every citizen has a right to involve yourself in personally, or through his representative, within its formation. It must be the same for adjectives, whether it protects or punishes. All citizens, being equal contained by the eyes of the law, are equally eligible to adjectives dignities and to all public positions and occupation, according to their abilities, and lacking distinction except that of their virtues and talents.

This is from the French Bills of rights.. I chew over... Anyway can someone help me to summarize this and share me why this article is significant? Also what central design does this declaration share near the American Declaration of Independence? Please help me near this homework cause I dont really find history and I dont know the answers to these kind of things... I am really failing history and I don't want to go amiss class... I want to keep on studying... So please help out me.
Answers: It only medium that in a democratic form of management, the people or their elected representatives within congress can make a tenet whether it is good or fruitless as long as it is the general will of the populace. In short, MAJORITY RULES. The second part is that adjectives are given the opportunity to run for public office.

Why do you need a driver's license to buy liquor, when you can't rightfully drink and drive?

This is the question of the afternoon!
What do yo think?
Answers: You don't requirement a driver's license. You DO need proof of age, which can be a non-driver ID, a passport, a military ID, or anything.
i think it may b so bcos the licence also give info about ur age

More Questions and Answers:
[203] - [682] - [1757] - [1857] - [11] - [2561] - [1309] - [2114] - [2558] - [789] - [178] - [2014] - [835] - [474] - [955] - [521] - [896] - [2504] - [930] - [331]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: