Law Questions and Answers

Is there a American Data Protection Act or something similar which concerns witht he handiling of private notes

Answers: There is no broad equivalent to the UK's Data Protection Act. However, there are specific law designed to deal next to certain specific notes types, such as childrens' or health background.

Do you think felon...?

Do you think felon with none hostile crimes should get in attendance back ground obscured from the public in five years after in that offense?
Answers: This is not a yes or no question. We claim to convey people to prison to "rehabilitate" them. Then we be paid it impossible for them to get a all right paying job and support themselves and their family. If there be a way to know the felon would never commit crimes again, I would voice yes, no question. On the other appendage if a person have a propensity to commit crimes then his employer have the right to know in casing he might be victimized. I don't know the solution, but there have to be a better way than the one we presently have.
No.

Most employer do background checks and it is to protect themselves s all right as their employees.
On one the appendage I’ve met many a convicted felon struggle to win their life together for something stupid they did years ago and enjoy felt somewhat sorry for their plight. On the other paw, if those records could be out of sight after x number of years then wouldn’t that diminish the overall deterrence effect for such crimes?

Then no. There is a point for that being the channel it is because so many ancestors would simply abuse the system—there have got to be irremediable consequences for certain crimes shutting of story.
Yes, they should. I know because I'm married to a man who committed a non-violent (financial) felony when he was 18. He did his time (three months plus two years probation) and have NEVER committed another crime, so he has ALL of his rights restored, including the right to vote. This man is terrifically responsible, and takes voting seriously. Not ALL felon who commit non-violent felonies commit simply one crime, though ... and many of the other felony are not non-violent. Many can not live the time with NO RIGHTS minus committing even a misdemeanor ... and they should NOT get their felony 'forgiven' ...
By the way, I don't know what state you live surrounded by, but in our state, it's 10 years, not 5 ... but save for my statement's 'differences' I do agree that a non-violent felony should be forgiven after the 'legal period' with no further arrests or crimes ...
No. Whoever is doing the surroundings check has a right to know what you own done in yesteryear so if for some reason you do it again, they can be prepared.
No.

If a minor is charged with transportation of alcohol what can the consequences be?

i be pulled over by the police and my car be searched in that was a bottle of vodka contained by the car that my friend departed there the hours of darkness before when i brought them home from a jamboree. i didnt know the bottle was in attendance what kind of consequences could i be facing. it is my first offense.
Answers: A SLAP ON THE HAND WARNING IF THE JUDGE IS IN A GOOD MOOD!! IF NOT, YOU'LL PROBABLY GET EITHER A FINE, COMMUNITY SERVICE HOURS OR POSSIBLY PROBATION, IF THE JUDGE ISN'T A UNDERSTANDING PERSON!! GOOD LUCK AND SLAP THE HECK OUT OF YOUR FRIEND!!!!!

Was Santa charged for calling the mother of a child a "ho"?

Santa said "Ho, Ho, Ho" to a woman with a child. He is presently in secure unit. Will he be charged?
Answers: This screams to me "with the sole purpose in America"

It is approaching the case file by a woman who sued over getting hit by a snowball, and the 8 year old boy getting sued for knock over an elderly gentleman (60 ish), on the beginners slopes if I take out. I guess he would have sued the slopes hand if he had fall on his own butt.
They put santa clause in secure unit! =[

No, the police can't do that since ho ho ho is not a threat. So the police had no probable inflict not even to put him in intern or even consider him a person of intrest for that issue. There are steps that the police have to follow.
If Santa is surrounded by jail for motto "ho ho ho" then he probably did something else. There are no trial grounds for him being arrested for aphorism that phrase, and anyone with partially a brain would understand that it isn't even an filthy phrase.

Political correctness has sunk to a unmarked low in the world next to the banning of the traditional Santa Claus greeting.
Many would titter at that question. I find it pitiful.

I have be with men who suddenly pointed to women, and proudly declared them to be "crack hoes".

I other took offence, out loud, and I do with u.

Crack hoes are VICTIMS of the holier-than-thou men who laugh at them, similar to Arab date rape victims who are raped, whipped, incarcerated and even gang raped for the "offence" of being alone near a man, which western women do on dates on a each day basis (and sometimes even beheaded).

And resembling the adulteress whose life be saved when Jesus suggested "Let the man, who have never sinned, throw the first rock". Notice they were not stoning the guy to destruction! It takes two!

May God bless you adjectives, even the hoes.
dam they in truth put poor santa in put inside????????????
i agree with michael p

Should men have to salary for babies they wanted abort? Just some food for thought?

Ok so there are like mad of people out near who are against abortion, which is understandle. It all depends on your veiws of the duration forming inside the womb and a womans right to choose. So I was thinking, when an impulsive pregnancy comes about and the woman requests to keep the tot but the man wants her to abort it, should he still enjoy to pay child support and whatnot. If the masculine really did not want anything to do with the pregnancy and the babe, why should he pay.

Please don't dive all over me for asking this. I be just pondering it, and would approaching to know what other people believe.
Answers: Yes he should. He was a segment of the process that makes the babe-in-arms, so he is financially responsible for the baby, even if he didn't want it. It is not the man that decide to have an abortion or not, it is the woman, and not a soul else.

If he is responsible enough to enjoy sex, he should be responsible enough to reimburse the consequences.
If the male looked-for nothing to do near the baby or the pregnancy, he should never own had sex next to the woman... If you can't do the time, don't do the crime.

On the other hand, a man SHOULD enjoy a say surrounded by the decision to abort IF he desires to keep the child. If the mother never wishes to care for it (90% of abortions are for reason of convenience), the man should still have the opportunity to care for the child himself, provided he is a fit parent. Otherwise, in attendance is always adoption.

To summarize: if a man impregnate a woman, he is also responsible for the child, whether he wishes to be or not. The woman should not have to sit out the consequences of her actions while the man get off scott free.
Yes. Pregnancy is the intended biological result of sex. If any person is not competent to deal near the consequences of a pregnancy, they should not be engaged contained by sex. It really should be that simple.

I don't think he should know how to dodge his responsibility be claiming "I wanted her to own an abortion".
First of all, I'm against abortion, unless carrying the tot is putting baby and mother contained by life difficulty..

In my opinion, if the woman wishes to keep it, and he doesnt, it should be HER conclusion, not his.. But if both decide to abort it, afterwards yes, I think he should pay envelope for part of it..
If the man really didn't want a babe - he'd cover his pec--- (you know what).
And no if a woman chooses to give birth to a child minus the support of the father, she should be fully capable of supporting that child. Heck, in a minute a days it's just plain dumb as a woman to not be capable of support your family if something be to happen to the father of their children.
She could own prevented this prenancy as well.
surrounded by the end it is the child who will suffer for the decision of their parents.
Once a child is born, it is entitled to the support of BOTH parents, wanted or not. The abortion law are quite objective, imo... The person taking adjectives the risks gets to variety all the decision regarding abort or not aborting.
That human being said, I find it incredibly foolish for a woman to bear ANY chld she herself cannot provide sole support for...
Yes a man should rate.
If he doesn't want to be a father...wrap it.
If she also wants to abort and he desires to pay, later that's fine. But a woman should never be forced into pregnancy or abortion against her will.

If she wants to keep hold of it or abort it, the choice is completely hers. Women have rights within the US. She is the one that has it within her body and has to labor within creating it.

Women are people too. Women are full human beings. Women own the right to life, independence, and property. Although, these rights are new to women within the last 90 years. Women gain the right to vote in 1920 and women gain the right to their body in 1972.
Why should he repay? You tell me what's cheaper: $3.99 on a box of condoms, or $300. -+ on a scratchy abortion?

Besides, it takes two to tango. He created partly the problem, he should pay at least possible half the procedure, albeit most would argue that's not worth the mental/ physical anguish cause to the woman as a result...but before he coughs up the dough, it's merely fair a DNA oral exam proves that he is truly the father of the child. Both parties should drink this charge.

Sounds complicated, maybe ethnic group should stick to 3 methods of birth control if they can't handle any of this.
Are you suggesting that a man should simply be able to say-so "I don't want it." and not pay a cent to the kid? That's get to be wrong. Abortions are not free, so even if he doesn't want the kid, he should pay that much money towards it.

I discern that if a couple have sex up to that time they have talk about how they might concord with children, they are doing something wrong. You don't newly walk into a saloon dealership and drive off contained by a lexus without conversation about financing. Well, I don`t know some people do, but they tend to twine up in prison pretty without delay.

If a man honestly thinks that by not wanting a child, he can hold from having a child, if he uses protection, and if he pays for an abortion when it's still possible to procure one, and if he can proove in court that he's done adjectives this, then possibly he shouldn't have to pay packet for child support.

But it doesn't take a rocket scientist to integer out that sex can cause children. Maybe he could take a break on the payments in proportion to how strong he tried to keep her from getting pregnant. That might be for a moment fairer, and would certainly serve to promote the use of contraceptives.

Here's a question: Why is it other the man who pays child support, and the woman who keeps the kid? Is that fair? I know greatly of guys that want kids more than their girls.

How can I sue my former dentist?

Two years ago, I spent $1,100 on a root canal and crown contained by Texas.

The crown doesn't fit properly, there are cavity under it, and section of it is broken. How can I sue my former dentist? I have an x-ray and dispatch from my new dentist. I've moved to another state.
Answers: The device of your damages is not the $1,100. It is whatever it cost you to fix it, plus the dull pain and suffering.

The first thing you gotta do is see if the statute of limitations would prevent the lawsuit. You read aloud, "Two years ago..." and quite frankly, two years is the statute for personal injuries surrounded by most jurisdictions. And it is two years to the daytime, so you gotta know which day you have the work done.

Next, you gotta decide if the "discovery rule" applies. It is 2 years from the injury or the discovery of the injury specifically applied to the statute of limitations. So, if he fouled up your crown, but you didn't know it until a year later, that is to say when the statute starts running. But the law frowns on tolling the statute, so you gotta do something to prove it.

Finally, you start next to a demand reminder to the dentist setting out your claim and how much you want. In the demand memorandum instruct the dentist to forward the letter to his malpractice carter. If you hear from an insurance company, that is a apt sign. If not, sue then. But as others hold pointed out, it may not be worth your time.

** Note: This is a general discussion of the subject event of your question and not lawful advice. Local law or your particular situation may adjustment the general rules. For a specific answer to your interview you should consult legal counsel next to whom you can discuss all the facts of your armour. **
Talk to a lawyer who specializes within Medical Malpractice.

Does Massachusetts have anything similar to Florida's Baker Act?

Answers: I guess it depends which aspect of the Baker Act you are looking at. But the Act to Protect Five Fundamental Rights contained by MA gives fundamental rights to the mentally ailing. See Ch 166 of the Acts of 1997
Most states have involuntary commitment surrounded by one form or another. Your local court clerk should be able to give an account you. Just call.

** Note: This is a broad discussion of the subject matter of your cross-question and not legal guidance. Local laws or your individual situation may change the standard rules. For a specific answer to your question you should consult permissible counsel with whom you can discuss adjectives the facts of your case. **

What is the limit to report medical malpractice if the person is beneath 18?

Answers: I am not sure if it is different in other states, but here within Ohio, any medical claim for malpractice has to be file within two years of the incident, regardless of the age of the injured. Check your own state law to be certain. I hope this help you.

What rights do foreigners have surrounded by India? Would my husband be my boss legally?

My husband is from India and grew up contained by UAE where his Dad works surrounded by the oil industry. His parents are not aware that we are married nor that we own a child but have cut sour my husband. He wants to up and move myself and our son to one of the two places and try to reconcile beside his parents. His parents have a great deal of wealth and I am startled that I will be imprisioned or my child will be taken from me. I have tried to incline these concerns to my husband. What rights would I have contained by Dubai, Qatar or India? Would I be safe as an American? What if I opt I want to leave and my husband doesn't want to? Would I be capable of take my son short his permission? I am amazingly concerned about this. He requirements to move, without even knowing if we enjoy a place to stay or a job.I am other up for an adventure but not if it process my safety or that of our son. I would love to shift to places he grew up, and if his parents were on right terms beside us I'd be SOOOO HAPPY to move closer to them. What should I do?
Answers: Have you ever seen the movie "Not in need my Daughter" with Sally Field? If not, you SHOULD unequivocally see if before YOU build any plans on going to India... EVEN IF your husband says it's with the sole purpose for a "visit".

Basically, Sally Field's character be imprisoned by her husband. And the story go to tell how knotty it was for her to escape and bring to a US Embassy.

Years ago (before 9/11) my sister (as US born American) was married to an Eastern Indian, and he considered necessary her to change adjectives these things about her. At the time, her son be about 2 or 3. She have dark, shade brown curly hair, and he looked-for her to bleach it white, and to straighten her hair. I could jump on, and on about this - as a LOT of stuff happen. The night back they were to "move", my mom and step-dad necessarily kidnapped her and her kid so that she wouldn't check out of with this guy. They know he was impossible news, but she be too blind to see.

After 9/11, she was contacted by the FBI just about this guy and was suspected to be chunk of Al Kieda and the terror attacks.

So, bottom procession - I say DON'T GO!!!!
This is a difficult predicament to be within. My understanding is that contained by a Muslim country women have little or no rights at adjectives.
I have lived within India & it is quite a bit more democratic so it would be a safer bet by far. It is predominantly Hindu & Muslims are contained by the minority & probably not quite so zealous as those surrounded by Arab countries where the government are Muslim.
Women play a much greater role in public affairs, contained by fact Indira Ghandi be prime minister for many years. So if contained by the event you needed support to resolve a difficult issue you will almost definitely find it nearby. In an Arab country I'm not so sure.
I would advise you to wish advice from the relevant embassy.
You may find folks are a lot more unstop & helpful outside of their own country.
I would support you to find out all you can as clearly the more info you hold the more you will be able to produce a balanced edict.
Hoping & praying you will find a happy solution.
Merry Christmas,
Gary C.

PS. I own also seen the picture mentioned by the person above & that took place contained by Iran which is quite different from India.
However it is perfect to hear different perspectives.
If it is UAE, Qatar or I would say aloud definitely no. Even contained by India it depends where he wishes to go.

If he is a Muslim next you got bigger problems.

Watch : Escape from Taliban, and "Not lacking my daughter"

Right NOW

My advise do not stir.
If your husband is a Hindu then the brand new laws are adjectives in like better of women, he cant do anything to you unless his family is mafia or something. Even afterwards harrassing a women or even if a women claims harrassment its going to make his existence miserable.

It also depends on which part of India, the metros and big cities are intensely advanced and have helplines for women and the NGO's are unbelievably strong here so such harrassment is difficult, in remote areas its more possible.

For Muslims the regulation is different and not so helpful you may own to depend on the local religious authorities to use their discretion in grip of problems.

In any case here NGO's will minister to you if you have a problem. First find the nouns where you are going, after find womens NGO adress and numbers in and around that nouns as well as local police stn. numbers. Again if you are a Hindu afterwards the laws are extremely promising to women.
You may take legally recognized assistance from the American consulate or embassy, for they are duty bound to take attention to detail of the interests of their citizens. In such matters, it is better not to pocket a unilateral decision. You must ensure that you are on right side of the canon. Hence, you need to wallet a case, where you are, seeking the custody of your child.

I would like to go my company in the U.K. & move to Canada, is ther an age restriction?

Answers: There is no age restriction for immigrating to Canada per se, but Canada does hold a "points system" which awards points to potential immigrants base on their desirability. Generally, older applicants are awarded a reduced amount of points than younger applicants. In this way, it may be slightly harder for a potential applicant to attain "enduring resident status" in Canada which is required to live and work indefinitely contained by Canada legally. See http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/immigrate/s... for more information.

The "points system" may be of smaller number consequence to you if you move to Canada as an investor/entrepreneur or self-employed person as these applicants nose-dive under a separate stream within the immigration process but you may have to show substantial personal stash on hand (at lowest CDN$400,000) that you intend to invest in Canada. See http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/immigrate/b... for more information.

****Note: The above is a standard discussion only and does not constitute permitted advice. Your mileage may come and go based on your specific circumstances or local ruling. Always contact an experienced legal professional to search out specific legal counsel pertaining to your situation.

More Questions and Answers:
[1948] - [1106] - [932] - [499] - [1921] - [198] - [1877] - [844] - [2567] - [869] - [2484] - [594] - [1839] - [2087] - [2479] - [2503] - [1810] - [376] - [1307] - [173]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: