Law Questions and Answers

EU laws???

this is reasonably a pathetic interrogate but...

do you know if they enforce laws such as have ID on you in a place close to cyprus to buy cigarettes. I am going on holiday to cyprus with my boyfried and we are 17. within cyprus you have to be 18 to buy cigarettes... what is the unsystematic they will ask for ID... are they more laid back over therem unlike here?
Answers: haha,dear ii live within cyprus and the chances to ask you for ID to buy cigarettes is simply minimum...they would not even bother to ask your age,they just want to get rid of,at least most of them cz nearby are few that they will.
Obey the law, even law you don't like,

If it Wanted to, Could a Large US Corporation Discriminate Against People of Either Particular Party?

Can a company legally by choice prefer to treat republicans and democrats differently?
Answers: I dont think nearby would be anything illegal in the region of it.of course it would financial suicide for them to do so...No company can alienate 50% of the potential customers and survive
Not legally, but it happen all the time.

Sale of sex toys illegal????

During my late-night lattice wanderings, I came accross an article discussing the public sale of sex toys in the state of Alabama be illegal(law enacted contained by 1998). My question is WHY????
If it's allowed to sell guns, which could be used to motivation serious bodily harm/death, then why not a dildo/plug/vibrator to be precise created for the purpose of sexual pleasure?
I've never heard of release by dildo!

Do you think this is going too far.have the government wish the appropriate way for it's citizens to hold sexual pleasure? I understand law against pedophilia and bestiality, but not this.

Is anyone else aware of other such laws? Please DON'T offer me moral talk around how it offends god and religion.this is a serious cross-examine about a serious misuse of governmental power( contained by my eyes).

Thank you.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/...
Answers: I agree with you. What I want to do within my home is my business. Unless I am causing injure to another person, it's not the gov't. place to transmit me if it is ok or not. There are a bunch a stupid laws out at hand as well. Like it is iffy in a definite city (can't remember which one) to carry a toothbrush surrounded by your back pocket. One would hope that the gov't would realize that they enjoy much more to do than worry going on for how one pleasures themselves.

Here's a web site that list many other dumb law.

http://www.dumblaws.com/
There's a lot of antiquated tenet out there state-by-state and locality-by-locality. This ruling isn't about establishment. It's about family who think its okay to intrude their religious beliefs on others pushing their agenda through the political system. In some places, like Alabama, they win by simple majority.

These law are hard to repeal because not a soul wants to publicize themselves as being "pro sex toys".
You are kid right? This country has be run by the conservative moral majority for 20years, and in that time they own made inroads into our government starting from the bottom (school boards)and very soon are making laws to regulate anything they aren't comfortable next to. Didn't your folks talk to you in the order of this stuff when you were growing up? It be the subject of many own flesh and blood discussions in our household. The National Coalition for Sexual Freedom is an administration that is on the forefront of making adjectives American's aware of what's being done to their right to privacy and their sexual freedoms. You might want to check it out for more complete information.

However, if you look at law state by state over the history of this country you will find there are abitrary law regulating sex even among married couples. Some states still have these law on the books. In some states its improper for a married couple to have oral or anal sex. Really. And god backing you if you are a same sex couple because sodomy(anal) laws own been used to certainly break into their homes and haul them away out of their own beds(Texas).

Until Americans stir up and realize we have done nought to protect ourselves from the Conservative Religious Right who have infiltrated commonplace American's lives like the lice they are, you will continue to see your right to your own sexual freedom dwindle. Common sense is not the platform they work from, they work from a call for to tell everyone else what to do but next do what they want from behind closed doors.

Educate yourself.
Because i.e. the law set by the associates who the good culture of Alabama chose to elect.

If you don't like it, try to adjustment the law.
"Death by dildo".haha.Well catwoman I guess you'll never live surrounded by Alabama!!!

How important are bank to a country's economy?

Answers: Banks are depositories of the monies consisting as funds of the people and use these for loans for use within businesses and housing projects which contribute enormously to the reduction of the country.
Banks originated as a mere "depository" of funds. When the perception came out that a hill could "lend" the funds in its depository, next currency had much more power within the economy, because if it wasn't man spent, it could be reloaned and spent by someone else. Before banks, the financial system was much slower.

Can Britain rightfully claim all the spinal column taxes that america hasn't paid since the time of war of independence?

We still properly own every american and their children. When oh when will they start paying King Elizabeth II all the taxes they owe?
Answers: Interesting, this "King Elizabeth" piece.

Is this your way of getting gay rights for the monarchy?

Or do you consistency the Queen should get a sex metamorphosis?
In all seriousness, the peace treaty well-known the independence of the US and for this reason there is no ownership issue.

But hey, try invading us.
roflmao, is gd 2 believe tht WE still own the world nd not those "rebellious yanks".

save up the fight m8, we'll hve 'em beneath control in no time

=)
No taxation lacking representation!

If I order from the internet does the canon say I can nullify from the internet?

I ordered a "free" credit report, and had to dispense my credit card information so "later" I could continue next to their service . But there be no obligation to verbs. Now I have received the credit report and also hold been charged for one monthly update. The internet site have no way to quash this service. Is there a consumer protection directive that says if an internet site sell something, it must also provide a way to stop the order on the internet as resourcefully?

Note: I know I can call a 1-800 number, but I am overseas and these numbers are expensive to phone from outside the US.
Answers: I don't think so. My knowledge they just enjoy to provide a way to repeal it (a written method of contact on the web, even if its not through the web).
I have a sitution where I bought tickets next to a credit card and was enter for a free magazine. Never got the magazine and later a few months later they tried to charge me for a subcription. I contested next to the credit card company and they warned me that due to varying transactions with phone/internet sale it is harder to contest these things. Also, you don't have to capture credit scores through these services, its best not to. You can permeate out a request form directly with the three credit bureaus and they'll distribute you your credit history free of charge. And most banks will donate you a verbal statement of your credit staning (at lowest possible mine does).
Contest this through your credit card. Contact them and explain your situation. They'll remove the charge and ask the other party to respond. Usually it's pretty unproblematic to get these things resolved, it a short time ago takes some work and restraint. Good luck.

Can anyone explain (in non law talk) what a prenuptual agreement is? and if i am getting married should I get1

Answers: It is newly a written agreement on who gets what within case a divorce should appear during the marriage. People who write pre nups are distrustful of their mate to begin beside, so they have no business marry them in the first place. If here is no trust , there is NO relationship.
Generally a prenuptual agreement decide what course of action will be taken surrounded by the event of a divorce in the adjectives.

It is a legal contract. It should be particularly drawn up with attention to court precedents as some of the provisions of these contracts have not held up within court.
A prenuptual agreement is a signed document between husband and wife-to-be clearly stating who owns what and how property and assets would be divided back up surrounded by the event of a divorce.

Should Doctors Be Ashamed of Their Role in Torturing Prisoners?

In every article I own read about the practice of torturing Prisoners of War or Enemy Combatants, as Bush have so handily called them, it is said that the torture, or jarring interrogation, is monitored by the presence of doctors, whose role is to make sure the torture doesn't in actuality kill the prisoner. The torture may bring the prisoner to the brink of loss, but the doctors watch the procedure, monitor his necessary signs, and make sure that he lives.

We adjectives know that doctors take an Oath. This Oath of Hippocrates includes the phrase "I will apply dietetic measures for the benefit of the sick according to my potential and judgment; I will maintain them from harm and injustice." So, throughout the ages, doctors own promised to "do no harm," on the other hand their role in torturing prisoners beside methodical and planned pain and suffering seem to do just that. My examine is, should doctors be ashamed of breaking their oaths to inflict strain on fellow humans?
Answers: I am disgusted. Yes.
Me, Too: I really like your answers surrounded by my questions and it really help me. Do you think I own personally e-mail you?

Why is alcohol legal within so many countries, including the United States?

This may seem to be like a dumb cross-question to some of you, but this bothers me. Considering the harsh drug law which prohibit the use of much milder substances, I see no reason why alcohol should be an exception. Like it or not, it's a not easy drug. Additionally, it's not even the prefered recreational drug of many populace.
Answers: Alcohol Prohibition increased alcohol use, caused distribution of unsafe alcohol products to be distributed and used (harming health) and criminalized tons people who be otherwise productive members of society... So eventually the cost of enforcement and incarceration, and loss of social productivity of everyone incarcerated or out enforce or encarceratingt became insupportable, and Prohibition be repealed.

If more people took History seriously, it would not be vital for a society to make like peas in a pod astoundingly stupid mistake again, in that the prohibition on 'drugs' have made similar gains surrounded by its popularity, and similar losses in safekeeping of those products. The cost of loss of productivity, enforcement and incarceration are becoming crushing... The cost of alcohol intolerance (very low blood alcohol levels anyone a crime, without indication of impairedment or accidents) is have a similar effect on courts and economies. But in recent times as in Prohibition, it get very extreme beforehand popular consensus called for the repeal... So, according to History, this round of prohibitions too shall leave behind... Let it be swiftly, before we are adjectives in reformatory for eating twinkies or something.
If I enjoy one drink at home, it is of no consequence in your existence. If I have one drink, and drive 3 hours subsequently, it is of no consequence. I am a very moderate social drinker. I don't inevitability whack jobs interfering next to my life contained by that way. Besides, as soon as you try to build alcohol illegal, you fashion it much more attractive, and organized crime makes hundreds of millions of dollars from the construction and distribution of it through the underground economy.
If you don't desire to use alcohol, you don't have to. It is a sound choice for the vast majority of ancestors.
Yeah, it was barred in close to the 1920. and did not work at all, society still got it lots.can you even visualize how much crime would happen, should it be wrong?thats exactly why i think substances approaching pot should be legalized.plus, life would suck short alcohol:)
whaat dou yoo thiink your tryin to dooo. noobodeees takin way my liqoor. I'll kik youor ***!!!!!!!!1
The ruling makers use it...
As others enjoy said, it created chaos when it be made illegal because it be already too popular. People are going to do whatever they want to their own bodies, and the command should not be able to interfere next to that unless there's a chance of harm others. Making drugs illegal of late leads to a criminal underground and the creation of brand new drugs. Educate people, discourage drug use, export tax them all you want. But criminalization is the wrong method to go.

Any legal goings-on?

there is this girl that have been making remarks nearly me over the last few weeks and i own ignored them thusfar untill yesterday when she wrote a blog give or take a few me callin me a cheatin sl*t among other this and talkin about how i come into HER store when she knew i didn't close to her so after reading it i decided that i be done and i wrote her a message not really the most polite but in noway threatening or anything of that sort she ends up showing her father who call the police and everything now she is wise saying that her mother is going to call fox 2 communication and such because after the girl that commited suicide over messages being sent 2 her they would be adjectives over the story and her mother said that i didn't know who i was messin near and now she is getting a restraining charge against me?? keep contained by mind we have alot of mutual friends but i hold only see this girl twice both have be complete accidents but she also say i'm stalking her is there any permissible action i can run against her?
Answers: Sounds like someone's overdoing it within taking care of their Precious Snowflake.

Avoid her. Don't yak to her, don't discuss her.

If you get a summons (which I doubt) to be given a restraining decree, comply with it and ask that it be made mutual (that she catch one too).
dont be in town for that year when the reporters come
just be in motion find a good legal representative
even though u spend a lot of money on this breed sure that u win and never lose the prestige
with the amazingly limited information you give it is not likely that nearby is much legally you can do .however I am sure the her arranger would not take weakly her blogging in a especially negative trend about a customer. maybe a better course of action would own been to forward the blog to her supervisors at work..one of two point is happening at home.mom is not aware of the WHOLE story or.. she is freshly as much a loser as her daughter siding with her for no drive other than inheritance.i would just drop her and any "friends" who cant see what is really going on

More Questions and Answers:
[1373] - [365] - [1402] - [2178] - [513] - [2369] - [23] - [1526] - [1643] - [1552] - [418] - [2494] - [1196] - [962] - [1772] - [959] - [515] - [1251] - [306] - [1873]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: