Law Questions and Answers

Why did they send me to juvie for something I didn't do?

My parents be going on a trip to Europe for 2 weeks (they won some contest, and it was simply for 2 people). So they sent my Grandma to live with me, so unsophisticatedly, I was living alone, because she is really outmoded and senile.

So one day, we have a half year of school. So I be walking home in my academy uniform. This new cop (literally his first daylight on the job) comes up and asks me why I'm leaving academy early. I recount him he had a partially day. He said he get notice of that, and he get no notice, so he arrested me and brought me to the station.

The police chief tell him we really did get out impulsive. So I was innocent, but not free. I needed a guardian to pick me up. My parents be still in Europe for another 10 days, and my grandma wouldn't answer the phone. I have no idea what the numbers of my other relatives be. So I kept trying home, but she wouldn't answer.

So I stayed in young offenders` institution for two days cause they couldn't tolerate me on the streets.


Then the cop told me I would hold to wait surrounded by a Juvenile Hall about 2 hours away because space be running low at their station. I was given an ginger jumpsuit to change into. They told me to newly put it over my 2 day out-of-date school uniform. I did next I was leg ironed, and handcuff like a prisoner.

They dropped by the house one finishing time to see if she would answer the door, but I knew she wouldn't because "in attendance could be German's at the door" (she's French).

So I was within a Juvenile Hall for 10 days. It was so unpromising. I was treated resembling a criminal because one cop didn't know what he was doing.

So what can I do? How much money do you regard as I can score?
Answers: in good health i don't know your age, but apparently you are old satisfactory that your parents felt you could knob livin with grandma, I'd enunciate you got a GOOD AMT. coming to you,,,,,,,,,,,,go and get a GREAT ATTORNEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Shop around and sell the movie rights to a movie studio.

*EDIT* - I looked at some of your other question you posted, and you sure have an fashion with cuffs! And, looking at more of your questions, academy uniforms.
You will not seize any money. First, it is entirely possible that the officer didn't get the message in the order of your school man let out untimely.

Nonetheless, if your city allows for students who ditch school to be arrested afterwards the officer was performing his assignment. You could ask to speak to the police chief and see what his recommendation is, but you will own little to ni success file a lawsuit.

On a seperate note, I regard as there is more to this story than you are recitation us. Perhaps your attitude toward the officer was a factor contained by your arrest.

As for how and why you were treated that approach in juvie; that's standard operating procedures. Everyone get treated that way. Just because you don't come across like a threat doesn't close-fisted you aren't one. Best of Luck.

?????????Republican Contradiction????????

Maybe one of you could explain this one for me.

If Republicans believe in small rule and a small role played out by the federal government, how can they after seek law aimed at limiting ones personal choices and lifestyles? Isn't that seeking the biggest type of government control? If the true substructure believes in limiting government role in things such as welfare and healthcare, later shouldn't they believe in limiting governmnet roles contained by personal choices like abortion and gay conjugal? Should a true Republican oppose any ruling that restricts the behaviors or personal lifestyles of the general public? I propose, because it seems similar to if you want less administration, you should probally start with the "War on Drugs", teaching, cival rights, and foriegn wars.

Are Republicans individual really opposed to something when it threatens thier religion or wallet??
I of late worry that Republicans aim small government solitary on those issues they would rather permit corporations control..
Answers: This is the problem I have beside both political parties.

The Republicans belief surrounded by personal responsibility (not relying on government handouts), but next turn around and tell you what you can and can't do.

The Democrats believe contained by personal liberties (do what you want as long as it doesn't interfere near anyone else), but want you to live off the rule.
Check out Ron Paul, he is hated by the other Republican candidate because he IS for small government. He voted against the period of war in Iraq, the patriot achievement, the amendment that would ban gay marriage ceremony, and any other constitutional amendment.

Even Bill Maher and his audience loved him!

Do you believe it is reasonable to own a gun in your house?

It surprises me comparatively a lot that any one can own one in USA (I am Spanish)
Answers: Quite adequate. Quite dangerous if one does not bear precautions to secure a firearm from aggravated burglary, or irresponsible access by untrained children, teens and adults.

I have no firearms at home immediately. I have them surrounded by range storage. I hold a disturbed daughter. She is adopted and is reasonably ill other of the time. I have kendo sticks (and ability) and a dog that have the appearance of one not to be messed with.

There are masses in the US who own large gun collections and ammunition i.e. not secured from theft or access by those surrounded by the home who should not have access.

Such irresponsibility is institutionalized contained by the form of a permissive NRA and other rabid gun enthusiasts.
Sure why not. I have 6 - adjectives secured properly and safely. Both my husband, myself, and our 20 year out-of-date daughter are well versed contained by their use. My husband and I also licensed to carry - not that we do, but we could lol

I dream up it makes no sense to spawn guns "illegal" because then they individual people who would enjoy weapons within this country would be criminals. Sorry, but I think I hold the right to be on at least equal footing beside the thugs!
I have a gun surrounded by my house. No fear astern having it within either, since I put it nearby. I don't maintain it for wellbeing purposes, but for recreation. So i dont see the wound in it. Besides, more children are injuried or kill each year because they get ahold of a pair of scissors or a kitchen blade...and I certainly don't see anyone arguing that those instruments have no place in the home...so what's the big stink roughly guns?



by the way...cute puppy
yes

Can surgeons operate on their own children?

Answers: They can, but generally do not unless they own to. The idea man that the emotional involvement (with the patient) might give undue stress to the surgeon, increasing the likelihood of making any a crippling or a fatal mistake.
im not sure...the imperative may permit it, but i dont infer anyone would want to.
i have hear before that no doctor can opperate on a blood relative. but im not sure if thats 100% true.
can you envisage if they could though?
talk give or take a few major pressure.
intelligent question- but it depends on the type of operation.
practically --CAN NOT --is the answer.
Yes, as long as it is:
1.) Within their talent
2.) Confident in their ability.
Yes they can, but is extremely discouraged and usually only done within extreme circumstances.

A situation were the father is heart surgeon and his son requirements emergency heart surgery and he is the only qualified doctor available. As I said, a amazingly exterme circumstance.
I would think NO unless they be crazy sickos. It would only give the impression of being appropriate if it were an emergency.
This interrogate seems wrong...
It reminds me of that story where on earth the nurse mother gave her daughter an abortion within their home bathroom w/o any pain meds.
yes they can they be better of doing nearby own children..

Where do you stand with regard to animal rights?

This is an intro into the arguments and the absolutist view.

http://uk.blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-KXAS.D...
Answers: It is out duty to contemplation for animals of all kind including those to be eaten All own a right to a good duration free of pain.
Animals should be given more right...

associates need to stand up for them more, casue who is, animals cant stand p for themselves
God give man dominion over all animals and empower man to utilize animals for self preservation. However, he expects man to practice good conservation AS OPPOSED to preservation. This is because, if we adjectives preserved everything in spirit we'd all be buck bare and starved to death.

As for the animals, they enjoy the right to be cooked rare, surrounding substance, or well done.
Animals hold the right to be served with or in need gravy.

When animal rights activist move about full bore Pro-life than I will listen tell than.
I am firm believer surrounded by PETA

People Eating Tasting Animals.
i think adjectives living creatures deserve to be treated decently

i also believe that organisation resembling Peta have made animal rights a jape. now when u feel of animal rights you think of insane hippys throwing paint around and destroying science labs.

i assume the whole animal rights dummy needs a re-vamp
As far as those who abuse animals (whether pets or strays), I expect they should get much harsher sentences than they do. If someone take on a pet, they should take guardianship of it. But if they can't afford vet care for anything reason, the state's animal protection agency should assist them with those bills.

I enjoy no problem with animals self used for food or with populace hunting as long as they're not canned hunts. I do surmise that animals that are raised for food should be treated humanely. Keeping animals well and in a verbs environment isn't only perfect for them, it's good for the citizens who consume the meat. I do have a bit of a problem near animals being kill just for their fur.

Do people who hold served time and are proven innocent recieve money after they are released?

I know that they can sue but do they automatically get any money. I lately watched this report on a man who served 27 years and is presently proven innocent and that would be sad if they didnt financially hold care of him afterward.
Answers: When a soul has be sentenced, in the US of A, and trial evidence becomes available, for example, the concern is taken to court and the previous guilty sentence is overturned.

At this point, a new trial may be hear, or not.

Or, the prosecutor may determine by the newly available evidence that John Doe, instead of Richard Smith, possibly committed the crime.

Mr. Smith who have been incarcerated will next be exonerated, not "proven innocent."

No court anywhere has the gift to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that anyone is innocent; the best one can do is to be proven "not guilty" by a jury decree on the evidence presented or exonerated after some sentence has be served.

Depending on each individual state regulation, an exonerated former prisoner may sue for damages. Some states do not have that provision.

To revise more about what happen to the lives of people who hold been exonerated, move about to www.the innocence project.com

Thanks for thinking about equality in our democracy!
Generally, someone who is exonerated after spending a large amount of time in prison have a cause of accomplishment against the state, and they typically settle before it get to court.

What's legal?

If a seventeen and a nineteen year dated are together, that's okay right? What about two months from immediately when that nineteen y/o turns twenty?
What's legal surrounded by Louisiana? Would he get arrested for dating me?
Answers: It's totally unlikely anyone is going to get arrested anywhere surrounded by the U.S. for merely dating or having consensual sex. The purpose of statutory rape law is to address child abuse - to set parameter for reporting authorities such as child protection advocates when they receive complaints or requests to investigate. Here's an excellent pdf by a regulation firm on a state-by-state basis: http://opa.osophs.dhhs.gov/titlex/statut...

LOUISIANA
A. Statutory Rape—Criminal Offenses
In Louisiana, an individual can officially consent to sexual intercourse when he or she is 17 years
of age.1 Sexual intercourse with a child smaller quantity than 13 years of age is illegal regardless of the age of
the defendant. In cases where on earth the victim is at least possible 15 years of age and less than 17 years of age, the defendant must be no more than 2 years elder than the victim for sexual intercourse to be
officially recognized.
I think the age of discretion is 16, but you might want to check on that beside a lawyer or by calling the police from a take-home pay phone (don't give them your names).

Should i be allowed to ask for a break at work?

I work as a night sitter surrounded by peoples homes who are terminally ill. There have been several occasion where i hold been asked to not be off the persons side for the entire darkness, this is usually a nine hour shift with a strict no sleeping policy. I do not grain comfortable eating and drinking subsequent to the patient, and this is repeatedly not possible lacking waking them. However because of the spirit of the job i do not be aware of that i can make demands and consistency guilty for even considering my own needs!! However i find it such a struggle to stay awake and alert for their requests when i cant even get a cup of coffee! Is this legitimately allowed? and ethically should i be allowed to ask for a brief break?
Answers: I don't think it is an unreasonable request to own two 10 minute breaks during an 8 hour period, especially overnight. Perhaps you could hook up a kid monitor in the client's bedroom or sleeping nouns and take the radio quantity with you when you engineer food and get coffee, etc. so that if something does crop up you will be alerted immediately.

Most job do allow a 30 minute lunch as well as two 10 or 15 minute breaks. I know mine does, however it is not an within home care opening.
in Florida, by decree, you are required to be given a 30 minute meal break for every 6 hours you work and a 15min short break for every 4 hours worked, so within a 9-5 job you obtain 30minutes for lunch and two 15min breaks through out the day. it vary from state to state. look up your state website find the statute section and check out employment law. they should own a person to bring you nouns at least once through out the dark. that's tough!

Why they do not consider abortion murder?

How come people do not consider abotion murder? If you must immediately I hate abortion because it is not equal to take someones time like that because they own no choice at all. This one girl said that it is not alive at adjectives during the early stages and it does not require oxygen, is that true or is she messed contained by the head. She also said they hold no living organs or things like that.
Answers: Because the medium is full of crazy liberal extremists who believe killing is ok, because they hold no moral values. Liberal teachers and medium brainwash kids with THEIR opinion, like they hold the last thought on everything. Abortion is murder! They reflect they can be the thought police. What if that fetus would have be the next Albert Einstein or Socrates, or even your best friend surrounded by the future? Think almost that. If there is rape involved, after that is an alright circumstance. If a teen get pregnant by her own choice, then she should own to live with the consequences and concordat with it. Fetuses DO require oxygen by the opening.
Abortion is not murder. You cannot go to lock up for getting an abortion and a doctor will not go to penal complex for committing murder.
There is no independent life. It is one and equal as the woman. She has the right to resolve if the thing growing within her body, like a tumor and the cell that have similar survival requirements, should be removed.

You do not have the right to explain to a woman what she is allowed to excise from her body nor tell her what she must do to make happy YOUR needs within terms of how you consistency about abortion.
If you be in a situation where on earth you could not afford to be pregnant or have (not to mention raise) a child, you'd be thinking differently. There are cases beyond some peoples' control that anti-abortion protesters don't conjecture about. I don't know why they touch such a strong need to live other peoples' lives for them.

Most ethnic group don't think twice nearly neutering an animal, or even ingestion them. Don't they have the right to live?
1. Fetuses own organs. The organs in a newborn little one don't just fitfully appear after birth; they develop and grow through the pregnancy.

2. There are many living organisms that don't breathe oxygen (for example, plants breathe carbon dioxide).

3. It get all of its fundamental nutrients through the umbillical (spelling) cord.

4. It is alive! A heartbeat can be detected within a few weeks after conception, but nearby very ably may be an undetected heartbeat earlier than that.

ABORTION IS MURDER!
because it's not murder

Zeusapopolis - Roe v Wade be decide by a technically conservative supreme court.
Conservatives are the ones that want less intervention by the organization in our lives.
so how is it that you blame liberals for a overnight case that stated the government must stay out of these decision?

if contraception was convenient with counseling
if the adoption process wasn't so screwed up
if penny-pinching was qualified as part of a broader sex rearing for youth
if rape and incest were somehow preventable
if no women have health risk due to pregnancy
if society would address the drug culture

maybe most abortions could be prevented
but that is deeply of ifs
> I do not care what the courts vote it does not make it right at adjectives.

We live in a society of law, which come from a carefully fair system.

If you don't want an abortion, no one is making you enjoy one.

It is your choice, and the choice of all women to own one or not and to not have someone else interrupt their ideas of "right and wrong" on their reproductive organs.

That is what society as a full considers right, and what is embedded contained by our laws at the utmost levels.
Some inhabitants do consider it murder because they believe it is a human with a soul as soon as it is conceived.
They are your religious right, anti-abortionists.

Others believe it is not a being that can be murdered until it is a viable fetus (able to live out of the womb independently). These tend to be your pro-choice advocates.

There are copious shades of gray, hence the controversy as to when it actually become "human" and when it's right to "potential life" outweighs the already established life and rights of the woman.

It is true that within the beginning stages it is little more than a conglomeration of cell in an busy state of development. It have no recognizable or functioning brain, heart, lungs, etc. and is totally dependent upon attachment to the womb.

Like a wart or a cancerous growth it have less viable existence than a tadpole, so induced miscarriage or a procedure to remove the fetus could be considered acceptable because it is still in recent times a part of the woman's body.

Partial abortion is the gruesome accomplishment of demolishing a viable fetus that could have be delivered and most probably would own survived.

Most people surmise that once it is sentient it is a child with a soul and should not be disturbed. Pro choice and anti-abortionists alike tend to agree on this point.

The arguement for adoption might stand if it "guaranteed" a level life, but it does not. The transition usually also damages an unprepared and apathetic "mother". Many children grow up dysfunctional, angry and dispassionate because they be bounced from home to home or lost in the system until they are dumped out on the street when they come of age. Not adjectives find loving homes and are subject to physical, mental, and/or sexual abuses. Is a go of suffering really better than no life?

Quality of existence vs quantity is something else to consider.
Hillary and abundant other democrat politicians have be trying to have partial birth abortion legalized. If you don't know what specifically, it's when they induce labor and when the baby's head comes out, they steal a metal rod and shove it up through it's brain killing it instantly. The work "kill" alone ability it has to be alive surrounded by order to execute it.

Sounds like murder to me.
Anything that grows is alive. God blessed her next to a priceless gift and she spit within His face. She will bow down before Him and she will rate for her sin!

Am I elegible for minimum wage?

I am a dishwasher in WV at a huge banquet audience. I get compensated $6.00 an hour. The minimum wage in WV is currently $6.55. How do I know if I am eligible to be remunerated this amount?

Thanks.. :)
Answers: If you do not recieve a share of the tips you are eligible. But if you get a percentage of the tips moved out by diners you are not. BTW..those tips are taxable
minimum wage is what is required. Your boss has to reward you minimum wage unless you receive tips.

More Questions and Answers:
[2097] - [1078] - [636] - [1203] - [1345] - [1652] - [878] - [857] - [593] - [1632] - [791] - [686] - [999] - [1554] - [512] - [988] - [989] - [139] - [1326] - [1370]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: