Law Questions and Answers

Do I still have to honor a contract?

I am currently an independent contractor. When I begin working at my current job I be on the books as an hand. I had to sign a contract that I would not work at any spa in a 5 mile radius. Do I still have to honor that contract immediately that I am receiving a 10-99???
Answers: You sign a non-compete as an member of staff. you are no longer one. Pretty much unenforcable anyway
Nope. Once you became a contractor you get underway to work anywhere. It would be very tough to enforce anyway.

Why doesnt the judge do something?

If this is Britney Spears' 5 time for not showing up for her deposition, should the consider issue some kind of charge??? I mean this is the endorsed system we are talking something like. I dont know what the laws are for something close to that, but I figure if the court advice your depo then it HAS to be done. Can someone elighten me on be the rules are if you dont show up for a court ordered deposition?
Answers: legal system, notion world - everybody go to send down

This world - If got $$ plus influence, you don't stir to jail.

should not be, but it is.
Bench warrant.

Should States pay wrongfully confined people if they are proven innocent by DNA carrying out tests?

Specifically, those who spend excessive amounts of time in prison..

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080103/ap_o...
Answers: I say aloud YES. I agree with affraidofamericans's comment to some extent. It is difficult to put a price on an individual's freedom. However, judge from the person's perspective. It can be devastating for not only the individual but also for his/her together family. They may potentially obverse so many difficult situations due to wrongful confinement.
Yes, and the other side of the coin is that if they are proved guilty through DNA testing their appeals process is stopped and their sentence is carried out inside 30 days (assuming they had be given the death penalty).

Why isnt it a requirement for couples to get blood test prior ro applying for a marriage license?

I know at one point it be required in every state in a minute there are with the sole purpose a few states that still require a blood test. Im only just wondering why they no longer have those requirements?

I know alot of couples would benefit from that information especially near all the dieseases out here.
Answers: Since most people hold already exchanged their bodily fluids with their intended spouse BEFORE they apply for a license it doesn't really label much sense.

Anyone else is still free to ask their fiance to get blood test and to let them see the results since they get married. There is really no inevitability for the state to be involved in it.
because a right to privacy is not something that you make available up when you marry someone.

Yes, you should disclose all this information. YES you should enjoy no problem telling your spouse adjectives this information when you get married. But how is that the government's assignment to inforce.

If your husband or bride to be does not want to take a blood experiment before the marital because they have something to squirrel away, then you should be something you agree about next to them, not something your government enforce on them.
I believe it is still a requirement in my home state, but not where on earth I currently live.

My thing is that I dont chew over it is fair to let somebody know two people that they cant go and get married because one has a disease. To my recognition, the way the law work in my homestate (and I own no personal experience, this is just what I understand) folks with in no doubt diseases like hep or aids wont be approved for the conjugal license.

In todays society, there is ample education and free or income base clinics that everyone can get themselves tested. It is no longer a concern of the gov past marriage because most inhabitants already know and know how to protect themselves, their partner, and their children.

I would be quite batty if the state told me I couldnt marry someone because they had aids, especially when I already know

Who can I contact about getting my end paycheck from a place that closed down???

I worked for a privately owned citgo and it folded and the owner said he would send our concluding paychecks to us..well that be about 6 months ago and I own not recieved a dime.is there any place I can contact that will assist me get what I am owed? this must be against the ruling or something? please help, any accepted wisdom would be great.
Answers: Your state department of Labor, they chase claims for unpaid wages.
The entity that owes you your final check is probably a company that has gone out of business, and no longer have any assets to pay you near.

Chances are you've left it FAR too long to do anything around it. Employees get the fundamentally first 'bite of the apple' when it comes to paying out money when you close a business. Whatever money the business had when it closed should enjoy been used FIRST to take-home pay you, THEN to pay other creditors, and next anything that was disappeared would have gone to the owner.

After six months, though, adjectives the bills are probably paid, the business wound up, and there's zilch left to discharge you with.

If the business be a sole proprietorship, or a partnership, you might be able to sue the owner individually, if you can figure out who he be.

If it was a corporation, afterwards the chances of "piercing the corporate veil" and suing the owner is even slimmer.

Sorry, but the likelihood are that that lost paycheck goes into the "expensive lessons" profile.

Richard
The first answer is probably correct. I would contact the Attorney General in your state for guidance. If anyone can help, they probably know who to be exact.

Crazy question Expect Crazy Answers: Sane ones too PLEASE?

Bird lovers are just about to be fined for feeding public birds. Their deseases are not cause by themselves, just as the rats within some areas are taken over and extremely larger,and the wood creatures are getting bolder,the caged are seeking revenge, the pets are betraying their owners,insects with slaughterer deseases, and the birds already poop on us. How would you defend yourself,what would be the 1st thought or act If they united against us adjectives at once. Remember they were here 1st. Think Alfred Hicthcock Would it be a sqeuel or the End.Blessed 2008
Answers: I would voice Go Get'em Mother Nature pay them rear for destroying the Ozone layer and peeing surrounded by our water to!
it would solve the world food problem

Is it easier to be a lawyer or a doctor?

Answers: It is to be sure harder to BECOME a doctor because you must KNOW that you want to go to med conservatory at a much earlier age AND principal in a medical or irrefutable field. Whereas, to enter lawschool, you can enjoy ANY 4 year degree.

In the actual opening itself, that would depend on the environment you work in. ER or standard practice or surgery for doctors. And corporate or government or insurance defense for lawyer.

Go for the one you love more. The earlier you initiate your trek the better!
Easier in what path.getting the education? ... hours? ... errand tasks? . there's a lot of comparison...

Well, this is what I can read out... both are relatively the same. when it comes to work hours...stressful... take time to be a full time lawyer or doctor...
it depends. . . you cant even compare the two professions, since they are VERY different.

One is medical - if you close to biology,chemistry,physics,anatomy classes etc, then anyone a doctor would be easier for you since you like those types of classes which money you are more likely to do better.

The other have a lot to do near sociology, political science - some people never take to mean that stuff so if you are good at that, self a lawyer is a agency to go.
These professions require dedication and would not be relevant for someone like you who is seeking "the trouble-free option".

How do restraining orders work?

If someone have a restraining order and the human being who has to stay away from that personage was one place, and the other personage shows up at the same place. Who have to leave?
Answers: You asked two question: a generic one and a somewhat more specific one.

Since you can look up "restraining order" via a websearch,
I'll respond to the "detail" part one and only: It depends on the situation.

If the person on whom the restraining proclaim was issued is visibly stalking or harrassing the filer of the order, after the police should be notified without delay. Usually, with proof of the lay down (the filer is usually advised to maintain a copy with them at adjectives times), the police will either put on alert or arrest the violator (a lot of times, that will depend on the emotional state of the "violator"; belligerence will almost other get the "violator" arrested).

However, if the "violator" is in that for a legitimate apology (i.e., on a date; purchased tickets for the same show/sport/whatever; etc), after it's sort of a gray area. After adjectives, if it's a small town (even NYC is small!), the likelihood of two population bumping into each other accidentally is giant (e.g., you both work at the same company and ensue to take duplicate public transportation! Granted, a judge will ask one or the other to loose change his/her schedule, but, unless one can work on a different floor, nobody's going to ask someone to voluntarily check out of their job!). If near is no way for the "violator" to - - contained by the aforementioned examples - - get his/her money pay for, and, more importantly, if he/she is substantially far from the filer, than the police might be powerless (in one case that I witnessed, which be on Long Island, NY, at a 3-star restaurant, many years ago, the police asked the "violator" (apparently on a coincidental date) if he would modification his plans, to which he reluctantly consented, but, since he was amicable almost it, the cops got the restaurant to supply him a free meal at a adjectives time).
In my experience, restraining orders normally DON'T work.

However, the law is that if the place surrounded by question is public, and the restrained individual is not restricted from human being there, later the person who obtain the order should will if they realize the restrained individual is already there. However. there's no directive that 'requires that person to quit, because they're not subject to a restraining order themselves. They cannot, however, desire to have the directive enforced if they choose to stay somewhere where the restrained individual already be.

If the restrained individual arrives and sees that the other personality is there, he should vacate - so generally, it's "first come, first to take to stay".

So, if you get a restraining instruct against me, you can't drive round town looking for my car and when you see it parked outside the movie theater stroll on in, afterwards call the police to enjoy me removed. However, if I go to the movies and see that you are ALREADY near, I have to quit.

Richard

Richard
check your local laws.

but technically where-I-come-from..the directions usually cover residence...not business's.
they both have the right to occupy public space unless they start combat at the location

if the person shows up on your private space she can be arrested

Age of consent Q?

If a 19 y/o male have sex with a 17 y/o womanly starting at 11:45pm, ending 12:15pm, and the females 18th b-day happen in the middle, be the sex legal?
Answers: Haha pious question.. Probly trial (Y) x
Depends ENTIRELY on what country and / or State they are in.

Richard
Wrong, it would be undemocratic. It would be considered statutory rape and no it doesnt matter if be consensual either. It does how ever swing state to state.

btw this is a really stupid question.
its 16 years older in the uk both mannish and female (heterosexual sex)it be 21 years old for homosexual consent
but very soon its 18 i think?

Why are men never concidered VICTIMS in domestic bombing?

Answers: Never say never. They are, but its not surrounded by the media. It doesnt evolve as much as it does to woman, and thats why its not publicized as much.
They are sometimes, it's just not put out near as much.
Mostly because men are usually stronger than women.
I'm not saying that as a doomed to failure thing, it's freshly a blatant fact.
The medium doesn't show us men getting abused, because it's not seemingly as interesting and also it doesn't happen as much.
Also - honestly, do you know like mad of men that would report it?
Men want to seem macho and manly (well, usually).
People wouldn't steal them seriously or they would be viewed as week by their peers/friends.
Although it does come about.
I know, I've been thinking nearly this for awhile, too.
never? woman and man has same rights. more man committing crimes than woman.

surrounded by Ohio state


2919.25 Domestic violence.

(A) No soul shall knowingly make happen or attempt to cause physical mar to a family or household beneficiary.

(B) No person shall immaturely cause serious physical injure to a family or household beneficiary.

(C) No person, by threat of force, shall consciously cause a people or household member to believe that the perpetrator will cause looming physical harm to the own flesh and blood or household member.

(D)(1) Whoever violate this section is guilty of domestic ferocity.

(2) Except as otherwise provided in division (D)(3) or (4) of this slice, a violation of division (C) of this screened-off area is a misdemeanor of the fourth degree, and a contravention of division (A) or (B) of this section is a misdemeanor of the first level.

(3) Except as otherwise provided in division (D)(4) of this clause, if the offender previously have pleaded guilty to or been convicted of domestic ferocity, a violation of an existing or former municipal ordinance or ruling of this or any other state or the United States that is substantially similar to domestic anger, a violation of part 2903.14, 2909.06, 2909.07, 2911.12, 2911.211, or 2919.22 of the Revised Code if the victim of the despoliation was a household or household member at the time of the infringement, a violation of an existing or former municipal ordinance or statute of this or any other state or the United States that is substantially similar to any of those section if the victim of the vandalism was a relatives or household member at the time of the commission of the defilement, or any offense of violence if the martyr of the offense was a kith and kin or household member at the time of the commission of the offense, a sacrilege of division (A) or (B) of this section is a felony of the fourth point, and a violation of division (C) of this wedge is a misdemeanor of the second degree.

(4) If the guilty party previously has pleaded guilty to or be convicted of two or more offenses of domestic violence or two or more violation or offenses of the type described in division (D)(3) of this cubicle involving a person who be a family or household extremity at the time of the violations or offenses, a betrayal of division (A) or (B) of this section is a felony of the third scope, and a violation of division (C) of this division is a misdemeanor of the first degree.

(E) Notwithstanding any provision of directive to the contrary, no court or unit of state or local organization shall charge any fee, cost, deposit, or money surrounded by connection near the filing of charges against a party alleging that the person violated this cubicle or a municipal ordinance substantially similar to this section or contained by connection next to the prosecution of any charges so filed.

(F) As used contained by this section and section 2919.251 and 2919.26 of the Revised Code:

(1) “Family or household member” means any of the following:

(a) Any of the following who is residing or have resided with the criminal:

(i) A spouse, a person living as a spouse, or a former spouse of the wrongdoer;

(ii) A parent or a child of the offender, or another individual related by consanguinity or affinity to the offender;

(iii) A parent or a child of a spouse, being living as a spouse, or former spouse of the offender, or another creature related by consanguinity or affinity to a spouse, person living as a spouse, or former spouse of the perpetrator.

(b) The natural parent of any child of whom the guilty party is the other natural parent or is the putative other raw parent.

(2) “Person living as a spouse” means a personality who is living or has lived near the offender within a common ruling marital relationship, who otherwise is cohabiting beside the offender, or who otherwise have cohabited with the guilty party within five years prior to the date of the alleged commission of the work in request for information.

Effective Date: 11-09-2003
because a man will never admit he is bullyed by his wife.
freshly like a man will never let somebody know anyone that his wife is cheating on him. while a woman will tell the world if her husband have cheated.
While it can be reversed, you've got to accept that there are more men involved within domestic violence than women. However, similar to I said, it can be reversed and the media tend to not mention it as much.
Well, I think portion of it may have to do beside the men. It's difficult enough for women to come out and vote they are victims. Imagine a guy admitting he's self attacked by his wife? Publicly. Also, it's much less frequent, as far as any standard statistics report.

According to RAINN, though, one contained by 33 men is a victim of sexual assault:
http://www.rainn.org/statistics/index.ht...
They are. Additionally women are arrested for domestic sternness more frequently than you would think and are convicted. To better explain men do not close to or accept individual labeled a victim simple by their own make-up of being a man and what that routine in our society.

More Questions and Answers:
[618] - [2257] - [300] - [297] - [246] - [1786] - [1330] - [2433] - [449] - [175] - [1708] - [2484] - [2039] - [895] - [214] - [2503] - [2212] - [2494] - [729] - [841]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: