Law Questions and Answers
Would you shoot and kill someone for tresspassing into your courtyard and taking a bike ?
I seriuosly would .Answers: Make sure no one is looking, drag the body into the house and later call 911.
Then you catch bike thieves who might as economically use a gun for protection
Why America has a gun problem
OMG!
nope... I would appointment the police.
Demonic by name, demonic by temper, eh?
How can you possibly compare the value of a human enthusiasm to that of a bike?
The laws differ by state. In mine, this is acceptable. Yes, I'd defend my property next to lethal force. Thieves will find no mercy from me.
Edit: Many on here consistency a bike isn't worth a human life, even so the thief would disagree. The shoplifter, as the aggressor, has approved his life is worth smaller quantity to him than my property. Why should I disagree with his summation? I, too, worth my property above the lives of those who wish to unlawfully seperate me from what's mine.
To answer your cross-examine;
I would not shoot to kill, shoot to wound I don`t know but one thing is for sure. The creature would never steal anything else your way that is to say for sure.
I don't think that fatal force is indicated for a bike theft.
I could be wrong.
i seriously feel like you did concluding year when the creep down the street stole my kids gifts. i told myself that he must need them more than me and i feel sorry for him because karma was going to bite him surrounded by the asss. hopefully tomorrow some of your neighbors will have see something and can lead you surrounded by the right direction. good luck.
patrick g...i disagree. i don't contemplation if you live in TX...you will spend time surrounded by prison. you only hold a right to shoot and kill someone if your life span is in hazard.
Yeap, sure would. And contrary to the answers above, luckily I live in a state where on earth it is legal to look after your property with toxic force.
I wouldn't spend a day surrounded by prison.
for just a bike? that'd be too much for me... if they be already leaving my front courtyard with the bike, i wouldn't grasp a gun and run out there and shoot them, it'd be too cruel. i'd only just call the police. a bike is not that much money any and a life is not alike value as a bike. possibly i'd get the gun and shoot at them, but not snuff them, only if the bike be made out of diamonds and was worth thousands of dollars though.
still.. perchance they really needed the bike. people cause mistakes in their vivacity, things that they will probably will regret later. I don`t know they don't really mean to hurt you.. everybody have their reasons etc. etc. and you don't know their go, so why would you kill them over one little article like a bike? to be precise so cruel
**dang, already two thumbs down? i guess people really only want to kill empire they don't know.. -____-
lettt''ssss seee.. uhh.. how about you own a friend.. and your friend was dare to go run and take a bike from a neighbor's house.. and he died. shot dead by the owner. a short time ago over 1 fking bike worth 70 bucks only. your friend made a mistake and died lacking having a second providence. isn't that sad?? .___. not getting to ya? would you savour shooting people?
ohhh, i see... what the hell. why would one and the same person who requests a bike want your son too? he can sell both on ebay or something? flee bazaar? if somebody comes after your son then shoot them.. for a bike after it's just no.
Oklahoma have some of the most, if not THE most, liberal self-defense and defense of property law in the United States. And shooting someone for trespassing within your yard and taking a bike would be illicit in Oklahoma. Therefore, the family that are answering this question by clich¨¦ in my state it is permissible to shoot the thief are wrong. If not, later please cite that statute in your state that allows a property owner to shoot someone within the circumstance.
In Oklahoma, one can use deadly force when resisting an intruder entering the person's home to commit a felony or to use any force, however slight, against any resident of the home. In the certainty circumstance described in this ask, the person is not entering the home to clutch the bike. He is entering the yard. Even if he be entering the house to take the bike, to be a felony within Oklahoma the bike would have to be valued at over $500. Most bikes are not valued over $500. The merely other option to use deathlike force if the bike was inside the house and valued below $500 would be if the thief be using force against someone in the house contained by his attempt to steal the bike.
By the way, I own used the term robber because I assume that is what we are chitchat about. However, the originally ask talks more or less "taking a bike." Therefore, maybe the party is not a thief and taking the bike for another purpose...?
Did you hold a sign posted saying "No Trespassing?"
Does you state allow you to use noxious force to defend property? Many states do not.
Now that you posted this, you hold show premeditation in your arrangements. Just what the DA and plaintiff's lawyer requirement to really clobber you.
Way to go slick.
Wisconsin has a website that list any and all legitimate action. Is nearby a way to grasp your information removed?
I made some bad decision when I was within college. I have a Disorderly Conduct and a DUI. I havent driven drunk since my ticket. I not often drink. I really have changed my ways. I am a soaring school don. I would really like to bring my past stale the website. I am not trying to hide anything, but it can really do problems when a student searches my moniker and finds this. When I was applying for training jobs I be told by some schools that they wouldnt hire me because of the website. Not because of what I did, but because of the problems that could go off if students and or parents found it. This website is not protecting anyone, but is costing me a great deal. I am wondering if anybody near knowledge of Wisconsin's law could help?Answers: How weak were you at the time?
Wisconsin allows expungement ONLY for misdemeanors committed when the criminal was below 21.
Richard
no, that information will be public record indefinitely, unless you can win a pardon from the governor. That is remarkably very in danger of extinction. If you want to try, you can contact his office at 608-266-1212 to bring a "pardon packet"
Does waterboarding qualify as torture?
According to Wikipedia, Andrew C. McCarthy wrote "in an October 2007 op-ed within National Review that he believes that, when used "some number of instances that were not prolonged or extensive", waterboarding should not qualify as torture lower than the law. McCarthy continues: "Reasonable minds can and do differ on this. "What do you give attention to? Can and do reasonable minds differ? Does waterboarding "qualify" as torture?
Answers: Anyone who question it should be waterboarded.
Then they can come back and bring up to date us what a pleasure it was.
Does it effect any permanent and irreparable impair?
If not, then it isn't torture.
I know we are adjectives sitting in a comfortable home.
We enjoy food and shelter and for the most part undamaging.
I can understand why culture object to torture and how evil it is and vandalism of human rights.
Now for the theory not let talk going on for reality.
In front of you is a man you have the information for nuke to go past its sell-by date and kill your kinfolk.
You have beyond a shadow of a doubt he has the information where on earth and when.
He smiles at you and tells you how great it is going to know that your people is about to become ashes and how wonderful it is going to be to know he be part of it.
Now let all be honest for moment can you adjectives tell me that you ask him again other for the information or introduce him to the waterboard.
If was me I hold 3 things to say:
1. Red is positive
2. Black is unenthusiastic
3. Sear Diehard
That is why I am not in the business to stop these guys.
I suppose that anything that introduces outright terror along near extreme pain and discomfort is torture. I also agree beside McCain's assessment.
Smoking in the coup¨¦ with children, communism?
we adjectives know that smoking is bad for us, but where on earth is it going to stop? California has disqualified smoking in your PERSONAL sports car when children are present.banning smoking surrounded by your own home?
Telling you what to do in your PERSONAL private space is a type of communism?
Communism or not?
Answers: big brother going to far
If you aren't smart ample to stop endangering the lives of your children, consequently I guess the government will hold to step in and salvage them!
And you need to swot what Communism is. It has nought to do with this tenet.
Children should be protected...they cannot speak for themselves..Just like sports car seats, or bicycle helmets...
but I agree (unless you are contained by an apartment) that you should be allowed to smoke in your own home.
Most smokers I KNOW, don't..they smoke outside.
permit me answer your question beside a question
if the parliament told you that you couldn't shoot someone in your private home, would it be communism?
self stop smoking on the dot if were you!!!
No. Not communism. Communism applies to economics, not personal choice. What your chitchat about could be construed as some nice of totalrisam.
However, I agree with the regulation. Children are not old adequate to consent to smoke, nor could they make their parents not smoke. The decree steps in to protect the inhabitants.
IT IS SO STUPID I DON'T SMOKE AND IT IS JUST RIDICULES HOW FAR WILL THEY GO ?
AND WHY SHOULD WE LET THEM DO THIS?
I quit even...4 mths ago.
As much as I hate to voice this, it's best for the kids. (Second -hand smoke kills too!)
I carry mad when my fiance' lights one up and we're adjectives in the vehicle on a family outing?
Just see in your mind`s eye:
If there be a race of folks who smoked to stay alive.
How racist everyone else is.
If people are dumb ample to smoke indoors with kids present afterwards getting a ticket is the least that should arise.
Adults have a choice as to whether or not to risk lung cancer and a significant chunk of their salary. They do not own the right to make that choice for anyone but themselves.
You hold a right to do anything to yourself you want to in a private space, but your rights come to an end where everyone else's rights get going.
In my world, kids would be taken away from anyone who smokes indoors or in a sports car with their kids. Clearly they don't deserve them if they would put their own bleak habits above the vigour and well-being of their own kids.
And no, it's not communism. As others said, it would be totalitarian, and in this overnight case, completely justified.
Study some communism, true communism really never existed.
But I achieve the point, I would say it closely resembles dictatorship.
When you are told what you can and cannot do surrounded by your own home and it is the law, you underneath a brutal dictatorship.
Hey you know there are some states that recount you what kind of sex is bent... so this is along the same lines...
Might be, but if you look at the children's perspective: describing them to breath the smoke from you cigarette is the same business:
and also communism is not telling ppl what to do (since adjectives type of governments do that: its call law), communism the the idea that every one is equal (in short)
Considering the amount of Medicaid I'm paying out to run care of greatly of those children, because they have various more health problems later children who are not around smoke, I really don't mind.
I think anyone who would smoke within a car full of associates who cannot tell you to stop, are idiots.
yes
I conjecture smoking in your personal coup¨¦ with your personal children trapped inside is criminal. My mother used to do this crap to me! She forbade me from vent my window because so she said adjectives of the smoke left from her side of the saloon.yeah, right. I say if you want to smoke designate a room & buy an nouns filter. Don't subject your entire family to your nerosis!!! My father smoked too. He smoked so much his fingers turned sickly. Eventually he wasn't able to jump outside to smoke-they don't allow smoking inside the nursing home. Oh yeah, my father is 82 so there go the theory that everyone who smokes dies an precipitate death he started at age 10!
Let your children breath cigarette smoke free nouns!!
Is this the same California that will provide your 12 year old daughter an abortion minus telling you ?
Thank God somebody is looking out for our kids.
Traffic court judge states guilty but no cost? What does that mean and Canada?
I go to court today and did my thing though not the best. Anyway that find state that upper to me.Answers: I'm not familiar near Canadian courts, but it sounds like the referee is saying that you are guilty of what ever charge it be, but he is not giving you a punishment for it. No jail time, no fines, not even probation.
I've have similar things happen to me while surrounded by the U.S. Navy, and I was stationed on a ship out of San Diego. Parking on substructure was definite bad, and everyone know it. I had received several parking tickets on podium, plead guilty to them, but never had to clear a fine.
You are guilty of the charge but there is no cost.
I would assume this includes no fines, court costs or points
Ask the DMV to clarify this first as I am not a lawyer
Can we marry again legally?
Hi,Both my partner and I are British citizens. We own been within a relationship since April 2001. In 2005 we moved to Japan together and lived there until July 2007.
In March 2007 my partner be offered a job contained by America with a starting date of July. To allow me to jump with him we have to get married. We be not engaged, as we have planned to do that after we returned to the UK from Japan. We decided to marry hastily in Japan treating it purely as a practical article we had to do to allow me to travel to America next to him. We did not get within engaged or update any of our family member. I did not changed my surname.
We had to register our intention to marry at the British embassy. However, we own not registered our marriage at a British bureau and we do not have a English marriage ceremony certificate.
In December my partner proposed. Our nearest and dearest is keen for us to marry soon and are discussing how and where on earth we should marry. Can we legally marry again?
Answers: yes but if you are already rightfully married then this would be a largely ceremonial process. A foreign marriage is permissible in England & Wales if it be legal within the foreign country where it be solemnised. I am a Family Law solicitor
No, because you'd have to pretend to get the marital license. You ARE married.
If you want to do one of those mock-marriages to get the presents and stuff and verbs to deceive your friends and family connections, that's up to you...but it would be a bad hypothesis to perjure yourself in obtain a marriage license to spinal column it up.
You should discuss the church vows with your minister, and be aboveboard that this is the religious ceremony which follows your overseas civil ceremony. It's not approaching he won't know, since you'll have no paperwork for him...
Legally you are already married and as Japanese marriage are recognised in the UK you can't bring married again. Use the Japanese marriage authorization.
No reason why you can't own the wedding reception a year belatedly.
yes but not in a church
but i would speak too ur legal representative
If you hold a legal tag of marriage from Japan, I see no defence. The two of you are married. I would investigate to see if and where you may own to register your marriage ticket. You might consider a renewal ceremony? Most who do them have be married for sometime. In your case, it would hand over everyone an excuse to throw you a reception party for the two of you since you didn't hold one the first time.
Iowa child support (case reveiw)?
Why cant i have my skin reveiwed? i quit my job to stay home and put on a pedestal 3 other kids, i was told by csr that my casing wouldnt be reveiwed cause i quit insead of anyone fired.how does that make sense? They also say aloud my case is lone reveiwable every two years. But ive been trying to capture a review for the last 3 yrs.im sure it would enjoy fallin in between these years..whats the business? Are the people at csr (child support recovery) that incompetent?Answers: Women are once in a while pursued the way men are. Keep discussion to CSR. If they wont listen call their supervisor, if they wont listen phone up their supervisor. If you make ample noise, somebody will listen.
Keep transcript on where she lives and who you homily to. This will go a long road when you speak to the supervisor. But you may have to pilfer things into your own hands. If here is a support order contained by place, go down to the courthouse and directory contempt of court charges for failure to reimburse child support. You shouldnt need a attorney for that-most courts have smooth to fill out forms. Then submit that and obtain a court date. She will HAVE to show up and explain why she isnt paying support.
Goodluck!
You voluntarily left your employment which money you voluntarily chose not to pay support for your children. How is that child support/ or the children's defect?
Unless you are trying to say that you are the parent that recieves child support. If you are the reciever of the support it works one and the same way. They will look at you and read out you voluntarily left your available job, so you caused the need of income yourself.
U need to step up the chain of command.find out wat department runs the child support court and complain to them and see will they fix the problem... they should look at the circumstances at the rear why u had to stay home...some individuals cant afford to pay daycare near the present job but u should be capable of get some govt aid since u are a single father...of late like they do near single mothers...it shouldnt matter that u quit your employment...u still should be getting support from the mothers of the children
Do you believe the internet should be censored nationwide contained by the U.S.?
be truthful as possibleAnswers: No! Censorship should begin at home through individual choice and parental guidance (read: responsibility)
no and the internet can't be censored.
google proxy server.
How do you know for certainly sure that it is not censored?
How would you determine if it ever has be?
not censored, but monitored and classified. just to keep hold of certain section of our population safe (kids, teens) and others (suspected pedofiles, cyber criminalists, hackers) on close to a watch register. the internet is the most easily taken pre-eminence of piece of technology and its not that safe, for anyone not taking guardianship of themselves.
Is there anything i can do to redeploy their decision?
A month ago a woman attempted to assault me contained by my local pub, i stopped her from hitting me by blocking her fist. She then swung her bottle at my lead so in self shield i hit her. Unfortunately this woman is the sister of the landlady. I was told to move off and did so immediately. I vanished it a few weeks before i call the pub and explained my side of the story to the landlady. Fortunately she is aware of the way her sister can behave and said it be ok for me to go contained by the pub. Her sister was away and so near was no risk of the situation repeating itself. Everything go ok but when i went stern to the pub today the bar official, who is another sister of this woman, told me i was expelled although she had served me with the sole purpose a few weeks ago. I left as asked but i cant oblige thinking this is unfair. Surely if i am disqualified due to violence, we should both be disqualified but of course this will not develop. Is there anything i can do? Are nearby any rules or laws they are breaking by treating me so discriminatorily?Answers: If the pub is working under a license its a public place. The pub can restraint its client by prescribing certain recommendation and limit the clientele/membership. However the pub cannot close a door to any character for personal reasons. It is not simply an invitation to treat. It is an propose for contract clear and open. Refusal to allow a creature to sit and buy drinks amounts to depriving a person of his right to occupy in trade or relish the services. An open refusal also amounts to vilification and unfair refusal whose remedy lies surrounded by filing a suit for damages.
the owner of a hotel can ban anyone they want, its thier business of choice
obviously you messed near the wrong person, youre breakdown or not
Sorry, but a bar can restriction anyone they want (Unless they ban relations on the grounds of "We don't serve blacks here", or some equivalent discrimination.)
I'd lately call the landlady herself and ask her to yak to her manager / sister.
Richard
There are other Pubs, why bother beside one where you have trouble and obviously are not required.
How can I get a compensation on a property in Florida?
I begin a purchase of a condo, but had to rescind for financial reasons and the loan be denied. The agent at Mirabella condos said "too bad" your money is not refundable. If I take them to small claims can I ask to be reimbursed for airfare and hotel?Answers: uh...you put down earnest money. Unless you hold specific language within the contract for a refund if you can't close, you are out of luck; much smaller number for MORE than the deposit.
a deposit is a guarantee that you will not back out of a traffic
you backed out
they receive the deposit
thats it
I don't know about hotel and airfare, but what does you contract say aloud on the refunding of a deposit? How long ago did you place the deposit. Florida have a 14 day cooling sour period for Condo's.
What does it utter about the financing. Usually specifically a way to procure out of it, unless you refused to cooperate next to the lender, i.e not providing needed docs.
NEVER take the agent's word for anything within real estate. they aren't disinterested -- they're chasing a pay check.
***
the details of your hold out contain the answer you seek.
if your tender was contingent on the bill of a loan in a sufficient amount at logically determinable terms [such as "30 years fixed near APR of 6.4% or lower"] then they are in somebody`s debt to return your deposit and you may sue to get it, plus temperate costs to file, etc. including the hiring of an attorney.
if your proffer was not contingent on getting the loan, they are set to perform but you refuse and then you lose.
***
Btw, it is not inconceivable that the developer is adjectives but broke and your suit to recover will founder because the developer goes into ruin. try google on their name to bring back the latest report.
if it looks grim, consult an attorney.
oh
More Questions and Answers:
[1992] - [1600] - [2010] - [614] - [2429] - [1300] - [2540] - [2218] - [2176] - [434] - [2528] - [897] - [41] - [1055] - [187] - [1616] - [1907] - [2005] - [2473] - [116]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: