Law Questions and Answers

How do I get a knighthood?

The boss of Marx and Spencer, Stuart Rose have just get a knighthood, an honour bestowed by the Queen of England.

If I visit a Marx and Spencer store, virtually adjectives products are Made in China, supporting Chinese companies, Chinese workers, Chinese atrocities, to the detriment of British workers or to more accurately describe them Marx and Spencer customers!!

M&S nouns is a result of selling Chinese products to British workers whose security , ably being and employment is individual threatened by Chinese competition.

So why is the boss of this fiercely pro Chinese company recieving a knighthood?
Answers: Easiest path to get a knighthood is donate enormous amounts of money to the Labour party
'Cos he have money and power and because the 'honours' system is a joke.
Knighthoods should singular be given to those who truly deserve them, for people who enjoy shown real courage or who enjoy done some real biddable for their fellow man, not those who are merely rich or famous.
Marx be a communist leader , how ironic is that!! All the big stores are indistinguishable in the UK , using 'sweat-shop' workforce in the Far East. You cannot complain give or take a few dressing yourself and your family if in attendance are competitive prices out there. The British workforce will want remunerated the going rate for the job contained by this country , that's why they use Chinese workers , the wages are 'relative' for their workforce and sometimes well remunerated. M&S are a national institution but still have to relay their profits to their shareholders , it's call Capitalism. It's no use getting on your high-horse about it , spend a year surrounded by the Far East.
Why single out M&S?, the bosses of Fenwicks, Comet etc., will probably get one subsequent time.
If you really want a knighthood then become an entertainer and lately do your job for the subsequent twenty years making millions in the process and you can't go amiss.
Or in the short residence do your utmost to destroy what's departed of British industry, become a member of the Labour bash and be vociferous within your support of the EU.
Your ire should be aimed at the financial people whose thoughts are set to making a fast buck at the expense of the British relations and their way of existence.
please send adjectives application for knighthoods to the following address:

HM The Queen
Buckingham Palace
London
Me not no ansir, solly.

Can I go to top-security prison for not paying my support?

My ex has my kids, I am to settle up 110 a week, and i have visatations. Back contained by Aprial/May I started not paying my child support. In september DOR took my licinse. In November they siezed my bank narrative which 1400.00 I have court thursday, what can i expect? Am i risking top-security prison time? My ex, does she get a word can she ask that I am not put away?I believe I currently owe 2,600.00Im going to Brockton, Plymouth county if that help.
Answers: I am specifically familiar near Massachusetts. The answer to your question is yes. Massachusetts is one of those states that take child support very seriously. You may or may not be looking at send down this time. That all depends on whether you convince the court that you will produce your payments.

When jail is used as a punishment, it will work approaching this: You will be locked up for a month or so, and then released, during which time your expected payments verbs to accrue.

This will all depend on the deem, but most judges will consent to you know you are looking at jail time first, up to that time actually sending you within. They hope that the threat of jail is plenty (since they know it is not going to help you spawn payments). Anybody who fails to repay will face reformatory sooner or later, but your risk of going to young offenders` institution is much higher if the regard as being thinks that you are intentionally refuse to pay.

Your ex have no official read out, but just indistinguishable, the court will most likely listen to her if she wishes to ask them for leniency.

This court audible range you have on Thursday -- it is your opportunity to engineer the court understand why you hold not been making payments. If you legitimately cannot product your payments, then you must petition the court to alter the pay-out schedule, and prove that you cannot settle.
Ask yourself this.
Can your children starve if you're not paying support?
Can your children freeze from the cold for you're not paying your support?
Can your children and your ex wife find a better father than you for you're not paying your support?
Can someone else or the government lift care of your children for you're not paying your support?
Can your children grow up poor and hungry and can`t bear your guts for you're not paying your support?

To answer your question.
I hope so!
In Franklin County, Pennsylvania, they will put you contained by jail and fashion you immediately eligible for work release. Maybe a few months of living at the county put in prison and going to work would be incentive for you to pay down the arrearages you owe on child support.

If you can find friends and family to backing you pay down the arrearages, it may gather you some jail time.
u severely well may be going to intern, why didnt u pay your support? i tight-fisted its that easy and be u ever worried that your CHILDREN may have gone lacking because of you? take comfort of your responsibilty.

How to appeal to insurance company?

My mom had Healthnet for her insurance provider surrounded by California. We started our move to Texas in Dec 2005. Mom made her pay in January. They still have their home in California, and it wasn't sold until February. So justifiably she was still a California resident. At the appendage of January she told them that she had moving to Texas. They refuse her payment axiom that she wouldn't be covered in Texas. In February she have emergency surgery. Healthnet paid everything. Then contained by October 2006 they denied all payments.
Mom be supposed to have surgery on the hernia backbone in California but the doctor kept post poning it. Until finally he newly said he wouldn't be able to complete the surgery. That was within January 2006, after she made her paid her insurance.
My mom didn't know she have any rights, so she started paying on this $40,000.00 bill.
I don't feel similar to she should be paying this. I have be trying to figure out how to write a missive to appeal it. I just don't know how to jump about it.
Answers: Most medical insurance companies hold an appeal process. If you lose your appeal you can file to appeal your denial a second time. Most states also hold insurance regulators to help protect consumers which you can contact (they do contained by Calif). With this amount of money she should fight the insurance company. An attorney may comfort to win your case if you draw from the right attorney. I lost my appeal for 10k to my medical insurance company and I just agree to it go short going thru the appeal process. 40K is too much at stake. I hate insurance companies surrounded by general. If adjectives else fails because the insurance company next denied payment after expenditure was made most hospitals will drain the overall costs of the payment to the long-suffering to avoid the debt going into collections. But your Mom must contact billing at the hospital and explain the facts as well as state the reality she cannot pay 40K and will they run down the bill. They did in my covering. Being that your Mom was still a resident of Calif. and it be an emergency surgery in Texas they should own covered her bills. If she did not make her monthly premiums during the extent of coverage because the insurance company refused her recompense then hopefully she have a cancelled check. If no check was forwarded to the insurance company afterwards hopefully she has a text of the conversation when the insurance company stated they would not accept anymore monthly premium payments. Doesn't nouns like fun I know. I go thru the same crap. Good Luck!
Get a attorney...

What file cases if they did this to you?

You own a new released Lamborghini and someone wreck your car outside your house and the one who prejudice your car is a tough guy specified in your town but they enjoy no much money, they can't even afford a new motor.
Answers: Contact the police and file a report in connection with the damage. You'd also involve to contact your insurance company (if your state requires you to carry saloon insurance).

If my offense is unadjudicated and i have completed probation can a perspective check reveal it?


Answers: Nope. I had a traffic offense that happend resembling that and its not on my record
I believe so. These days nil is private anymore

Is law difficult to study? Any legal representative or attorney here can share with? I hold a great interest to be a lawyer.


Answers: You enjoy to not only swot up the law, but you hold to understand and anticipate how it will be applied and interpreted. It's difficult; plenty of citizens could probably do it, but most would not be very dutiful at it. While in decree school, expect to spend 60+ hours per week reading precidential cases.

If you want a indication of what it is like, step to your nearest law library; let somebody know the law librarian that you're thinking going on for studing law, and that you would approaching to read a law school-type suitcase. Pick one that is at least possible 5 pages long. Try it out. Multiply it times 60 hours per week. That's regulation school for'ya! If you resembling it, go for it.

99% of most lawyer spend less than 1 hour per week contained by court, so if you do practice, plan on spending most of your time in the bureau doing paperwork. This is great for some people (such as myself), but too several people travel into the field expecting their work to be similar to it is on TV, get depressed, and move off after 2 years. Good luck.
It's one of the hardest courses to get into sometimes in that are rouund about ways to catch into a similiar field.
Join the police and become a presecutor for the police.
Do a similiar course close to parra legal.

Surety bond illiterate.?

i want to learn..severall things going on for a surety bond. especially for obtaining a peddler license. assuming you want a 25,000 surety bond .(1.)do you need to carf-up the total amount in full.(2.)and assuming you no longer own your dealer license .do you get hold of your entire $25,000 surety bond back...
Answers: It's an insurance premium and what it will cost you depends on who is posting it and what you are. NO, you don't carry the premium back.

Is Movie piracy and software piracy rampant in South East Asian countires similar to?

India, Chine etc.,
Can anybody tell me which countries own and have not signed the DMCA
Answers: piracy is adjectives everywhere not only india n china..every1 wud prefer 2 hav sumthing 4 nothin..wen sumthig is available 4 free as compared 2 spending time or shot or even money 2 get it empire prefer the free alternative be the person indan chinese american european or african.so surrounded by countries like india n china who hav a huge population using the internet they prefer the free movie n software online fairly than the more expensive alternative
VERY MUCH

Why is it that.?

In ancient Greece or Mycene if someone pissed you off/offended you sufficently you could kill them unless yhey be able to stop you, however today you can punch someone and get charged near "assault" and go to young offenders` institution?
Which model do you more agree with?
Answers: Me think ye have gotten into trouble. In Greece they did not resembling how you thought, they could force you to kill yourself. You monitor to many movies. Also, me think you want an excuse for what you did.
If we still lived by the first method, then energy would be chaos! People would be getting murdered everywhere adjectives the time! It would be horrible! I definately agree with today's law. If a person made a complately innocent gesticulation and someone misinterpreted it in the prehistoric days, the innocent person might seize killed for without doubt nothing. People would hold small families and would live contained by fear of respectively other.

What do you feel going on for sentencing minors to life within prison?

I was reading an article going on for the United Nations voting to abolish the punishment of children who commit crimes from life time confinement. The United States was the lone nation wishing to fit tightly to its punishment policy on children who commit crimes to serve out 20 or more years in prison.

Here is a connection to the article and maybe you can utter what you feel more or less such laws carried out within this country. It is an issue worth discussion, and I really hadn't thought about up to that time now.

http://thoughtmerchant.wordpress.com/cat...

If you don't agree, afterwards what solution would you support?
If you agree with this form of punishment, the what reason support your view? Do you regard you have a better perception all together?
Answers: The article be not there at first, but when I clicked "Lifers" on the side tavern I saw it. I feel that sentencing adults to a prison residence of over 20 years is cruel, it would be more humane to execute them. Even more so for juveniles. I don't know how the woman in the article who be nearly killed can voice her attacker deserves only 15-20 years. Is she really going to greeting her back into the family connections? That is insane.

I know that sounds harsh, and without doubt innocent people do acquire caught in miscarriages of equality. But can you honestly say that spending 30 or so years contained by jail could product you a better person? What are you supposed to do for a living when you acquire out? People in prison enjoy problems re-entering society because they suddenly have so tons choices ... not just big choices, but little ones similar to what to wear or eat. This holds true even if they are released after mortal found not guilty and awarded damages by the courts (which are often minisquel once the lawyer get their cut).

Should due payers be forced to keep relations in intern for this amount of time? Many people come up with that people who are seedy should be "put out of their misery" because of rising health vigilance costs (in cases like Terri Shavo the vigour system made a mistake by diagnosing her as being contained by a persistent vegetative state, which be shown to be incorrect by autopsy, so it is an analogous situation). So why would they expect to be have to support race in prison for extended period of time?
I am n ot sure that there is a indisputable solution to this problem. Perhaps there should be really tough sentences for immature offenders. Something along the lines of serious time within a closed institution, even for minor offenses.
For example - 3 months for a first offense for vandalism, shoplifting or other minor offenses. Let them be within these places with strict regimens, and no benefits, no xBox, no nintendo, no PSP, no cell phones, no zilch. Just school work and anything projects that these places do - this will teach kids that here are high prices to clear for their actions.
I regard as that if a "child" can commit a very "adult" crime, they should do "adult" time.

Age shouldn't be an issue, because where on earth the murderous intent came from doesn't adjust the fact that someone have been murdered. We enjoy no right to decide leniency on behalf of someone who be killed for no motivation, so the default is enthusiasm imprisonment or wherewithal punishment.
Try looking at it from a victim's perspective, the victim's family and loved ones.
Perpetrators of lawless crimes sentence their victim's to death and their victims loved ones of a vivacity sentence of grief and loss. Our legal system does not weigh the full weight of a angry crime from a victim's perspective, however, the perpetrator must be treated "fairly"? "Humanely"? Their rights reserved. I say, hang on to the laws alike...
Depends on the crime. There are a lot of youthful teens that do some horrible crimes now days. If it is murder, they should do a great deal of years; Rape that should be at least 30. Just because they are young at heart they still did the crime. I don't feel sorry for them at adjectives. The United Nations need to save their noses out of this. They are not Citizens of our Country for one. Also, did you read the part of the pack where they wan control of the Internet so they can rates us on it too? You think they are a asset person in our Country, you are mistaken. They involve to go to Africa or some other Country.
I read aloud the U.S. is approaching juvenile crime with an interesting and possibly even wise approach. Take young at heart kids, make em rate for their crimes for the rest of their lives and maybe they'll swot not to make indistinguishable mistake in the subsequent life! In realness though, this is ridiculous, granted the child isnt a mass murderer/ serial killer. Children form mistakes, sometimes that mistake is stealing a pack of gum, sometimes, that mistake is shooting someone on the block whether accidental or not, maybe because the world around them told/ taught them that it be the thing to do to achieve anywhere in the world around them/ establish a pet name. I'm no judge or jury, but i dont guess that everyone convicted of a crime whether theft/ gun/ etc is a bad party off the posterior, you have to clutch into account back sentencing that (1) there is other a slight chance that they could truly be innocent of the crime (2) that people variety mistakes, and many are inclined to learn from their mistakes though we other seem to focus on the ones who arent
(3) and surrounded by this case specifically, that self young is something like learning and making mistakes, and no im not condoning breaking the imperative but you have to purloin into consideration that these young "monsters" mortal locked away for 20 years to life, arent repeatedly "monsters" of their own doing. 9/10 times "Monsters" are created by parents, social environments like the surrounding community, and the track of life around them. Many of these children own committed serious crimes, but what the law within the US doesnt seem to realise is that oftentimes these children own spent perhaps the entirety of their childhood/ adolescense contained by "punishment"/ misery, and people single live once. is it either right or rational to give up on them up to that time adulthood, and guarantee that they'll spend the rest of their natural life in misery as all right? I dont think so.

More Questions and Answers:
[83] - [1922] - [2326] - [1209] - [264] - [2183] - [1170] - [1695] - [1401] - [366] - [2365] - [1627] - [1822] - [993] - [1667] - [2120] - [2568] - [19] - [51] - [2412]


The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: