Law Questions and Answers
Is singling out considered to be discrimination?
I be born Romania and came to this country when I be 13 years old. I've be at my current job for 15 years and have no problems with anyone. Ever since this governor took over our department about 2 years ago, I started to enjoy problems. My work performaace evaluations were great. But he other would say that population feel that I'm bossy and critical of others. When I asked for more specifics he would not distribute me any specifics.Never the less, I told him that I would try to clear up any misunderstanding. Recently, he told me that near were some miscomunication within our department between the morning and evening staff. My name come up because I asked a general put somebody through the mill like, where on earth is another employee and why he is not helping? I asked zilch personal. Other employees ask similar question all the time. Manager told me that I be not in trouble but documented this complaint surrounded by my file. No one get written up but me. I know have be singled out. What should I do? Can I go to HR?Answers: File a complaint beside the department of labor relations. Then follow their instructions. If you work in the city or in the neighbourhood a city call the labor board surrounded by that city for help. They will provide you next to better information than you will find here ( they know they workplace laws, rules and regulations of your state)
i see no nouns here, maybe a horrendous boss who does not suppose much of you, but no discrimination.
I would travel to HR and see what can be done, if you feel that you are man wrongly singled out then use what resources you hold to fight stern.
good luck
I hold worked with family such as you describe yourself to be. My experience coincides with what your organizer said. I found them rude, inconsiderate, demanding, critical of others, and condescending. That was my experience and it be not with one Romanian immigrant, but several. Quite possibly, you do not see yourself as others who work near you see your actions, statements, etc. It have a lot to do beside your demeanor, i.e. how your communicate. I doubt anyone is going to side with you. However, the opinion of those in hr could relief.
Is filmz.tv illegal, if so, where on earth can I find information about forbidden sites.?
I watched around three movies in Filmz.tv, next I realized that it could be dishonest, they have some movies that are currently within theaters, this is crazy, I am not going to that sites anymore.Answers: why not! if its still there next its fine! there are no reason not to watch them,
scaredy cat
Abusive husband files report that he is abused?
If an abusive husband go to the police and files a report that he is an abused husband and calls the Child Protective services to detail them he is being abused, what do you do? Do you counter folder a report?I was cleaning the house and found a piece of quality newspaper with a report number, a folder date and also the number of the victims crisis unit. When I asked him nearly it, he lied at first and said he didn't go anywhere. Later on he said he go there but didn't wallet a report, but got a defence number assigned anyway. Could he get a record number without file a report? I am confused.
Additional Details
His history is...
He was married up to that time - they got divorced. His sister said the cops be called lots of times. She did not right to be heard why.
Also, in 1993, he slapped his girlfriend she call the cops and he was jailed for the weekend. She dropped the charges latter.
I have talk with a counselor roughly his abuse previously.
I hold letters he wrote beggin
Answers: Your examine would indicate to me that he filed a falsehood against you. You need an attorney to see that that report is contradicted. You inevitability as well to enter your own police report. Your husband appears to be setting you up. Don't allow him to enjoy ANY benefit of the doubt.
If no one have questioned you or your children roughly speaking this it means they found zilch.
Legal question: Video tape people surrounded by public?
I was going around to local stores doing little interviews near people that be funny jokes. Like I would ask someone a funny piece. I was gonna put it up on youtube... could I bring back in trouble for putting someone up if they didn't furnish me permission? Do I hold to ask after each soul I do it with?Answers: It's complicated. If you told them up front, on cartridge, that you were doing this as a youtube project, and they go ahead, it would probably be OK. A lawyer could argue, if your camera be obvious, that purely participating was implied consent. If you do something next to the original content that would be illogical to the person (like adding up sexual content), you could have a problem. They own agreed to a limited invasion of privacy.
If you are purely asking people question and surreptitiously recording them, you're asking for trouble.
And, logically, if you make money from the video, you will need consent.
Yes, you own to get them to sign bad on using their image on camera..
Otherwise, you would enjoy to blur out their face.
But, afterwards again, they may not ever find out you posted it on YOUTUBE.
Applying For Unemployment In Wisconsin?
My boss emails me on myspace to tell me when to work. Then, I don't recieve the emails. I enjoy repeatedly told her that I need her to appointment, given her my phone number several times, and still recieved no cooperation.After this happened, I would drive historic, see that we were busy, but still not recieve a hail as.
She messaged me on myspace today and told me I am fired because they are slow and dont need me.
I hold been working near since the end of october, and I would similar to to know what are the requirements for unemployment contained by wisconsin?
Answers: why can't u just capture another job.or sue you boss.
i suggest u have the right to sue her...because she fired u for no material reason...she's the one who never tried to digit out ways that could make u both work this unharmed thing out and cooperate.
impossible enough, she didn't even want to try what u suggested...
walk here
just click on the links give an account you come to a map then choose your state
http://www.dol.gov/dol/topic/unemploymen...
Justr remember, if you be only fragment time,
More than likely, you will not qualify for laying-off.
Unemployment has min hours worked and min income diploma, before you qualify.
if adjectives the employment you have final year was 60 days from oct to dec, you aren't elligible. Check the state employment warranty page.
Is there a regulation or something to that effect saying that the federal govt, cant bring in states fund a bill?
its a speech abt funding an education bill, and it say that funding for the bill will come from states, and i have to speak the federal govt. cant make state government funds bills proposed by the congress.Answers: Yes and no.
The Federal government cannot overhaul a new program, afterwards make the states discharge for it.
But, the federal government, can affix a new program, to something similar to the education bill,
And voice, if the states don't fund the program, then the states, won't recieve any childhood funding.
Thats how the federal government get the minimum drinking age raised to 21,
They sate, any state that didn't own a minimum drinking age of 21, would no longer recieve federal highway funding.
In essence, they blackmailed the states into changing the state decree.
There are a few supreme court decisions on this. See Printz v. United States.
Do you think that English desires to be made the official jargon of America?
Answers: Yes.
It already is. The official verbal communication of any country is the language surrounded by which the government conducts its' business.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
English should be the allowed language of the United States. It is after adjectives, the international language for business, and nouns travel.
However; I'm always amazed at the reality that most states have multiple language for a driver's license; but all our state and federal traffic signs are contained by English. Should you be able to drive and not read traffic signs surrounded by English?
Yes. Years ago, when our forefathers came from adjectives over the world to the "Great Melting Pot," they all have to learn English to become a citizen.
Now that near are so many PC nation trying to do what is best for our country, we are becoming more and more divided.
No, it should not. We should value diversity, not suppress it. It enrichens our culture.
I am not trying to be PC, this answer is completely serious.
Yes it should be
What is the statute of limitations in TX for prosecuting for forging prescriptions?
A loved ones member forged narcotic prescriptions contained by the state of TX and I asked if she knew how long the state have to press charges and she doesn't know. It's been going on for 6 months since the last prescription be written/redeemed. Does anyone know how long the state has to press charges previously the statute of limitations runs out? Thanks!Answers: While I don't know what the statute of limitation within Texas is for this specific crime, most statutes of limitation inTexas run seven years. I also know that it's practically impossible contained by this state to get prosecuted for anything. I'm not exactly sure why /how anyone is surrounded by jail. You hold to essentially kill someone up to that time the police get bad their butts to investigate. And even then, adjectives you have do to is say aloud that you didn't do it, and they'll go away.
I don't muse there is one if the offense involves a felony.
What are the actual targets of American Civil Liberties Union, also agreed as ACLU?
Answers: Violations of the U.S. Constitution that result in infringement of the liberty of the citizens.
God.
Dear God,
Why do you allow so much violence surrounded by the schools?
Signed,
A concerned student
--------------------------------------...
Dear concerned student,
I'm not permitted in the school.
Signed,
God
The ACLU defends the Bill of Rights for adjectives Americans thereby preserving the fist 10 Amendments of the Constitution which is under connstant attack by the forces of intolerance.
I refer you to the following Legal Arguments advanced by the Bush Administration to demonstrate why our Constitution must constantly and vigilantly be defended by those who would hold it contained by contempt.
Below are a listing of 10 most foolish "Constitutional" arguments put forth by the Bush Administration.
10. Attempt to Get Death Penalty for Zacarias Moussaoui
Long after it was clear the unlucky Frenchman was neither the "20th hijacker" nor a knob plotter in the attacks of 9/11, the command pressed to execute him as a "conspirator" in those attacks. Moussaoui's alleged association? By failing to confess to what he may have specified about the plot, which may hold led the command to disrupt it, Moussaoui directly caused the death of thousands of people. This massive overreading of the federal conspiracy law would be laughable were the stakes not so illustrious. Thankfully, a jury rejected the notion that Moussaoui could be executed for the crime of merely wishing nearby had be a real nouns between himself and 9/11.
9. Guantanamo Bay
It takes a licking but it keep on ticking. After the Supreme Court struck down the military tribunals planned to try hundreds of detainees moldering on the base, and after the president agreed that it might be a biddable idea to close it down, the worst public relations fiasco since the Japanese internment camp lives on. Prisoners once deemed "among the most hazardous, best-trained, vicious killers on the facade of the earth" are either faintly released (and usually set free) or still awaiting trial. The lucky 75 to be tried there will be cheered to hear that the Pentagon have just unveiled plans to build a $125 million legally recognized complex for the hearings. The affairs of state has immediately officially put more thought into the design of Guantanamo's court bathrooms than the charges against its prisoners
8. Slagging the Media
Whether the Bush regime is reclassifying previously declassified documents, sidestepping the FOIA, threatening journalists for leak on dubious legal grounds, or, most just now, using its subpoena power to try to wring secret documents from the ACLU, the command has continued its "secret at any price" campaign. Is this a constitutional crisis? Probably not. Annoying as hell? Definitely.
7. Slagging the Courts
It starts near the president's complaints about "striker judges," and evolves to Congressional threats to appoint an inspector common to oversee federal judges. As public distrust of the bench is fueled, the stripping of courts' authority to hear intact classes of cases—most recently any habeas corpus claims from Guantanamo detainees—almost seem reasonable. Each tiny incursion into the nouns of the judiciary seems reasonable. Until you realize that the courts are often the solely places that will defend our shrinking civil liberty. This leads to ...
6. The State-Secrets Doctrine
The Bush administration's insane argument surrounded by court is that judges should dismiss entire lawsuits over abundant of the outrages detailed on this very enumerate. Why? Because the outrageously illegal things are themselves matter of top-secret national security. The regime has raise this claim in relation to its adventures surrounded by secret wiretapping and its fun next to extraordinary rendition. A government privilege once used to sidestep civil claims have mushroomed into sweeping immunity for the administration's sometimes criminal behavior.
5. Government Snooping
Take your pick. There's the NSA warrantless eavesdrop program wherein the president breezily authorized spying on the phone calls of innocent citizens, within violation of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. The FBI's TALON database shows the governing body has be spying on nonterrorist groups, including Quakers, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, and Veterans for Peace. The Patriot Act lives on. And that's just the stuff we know nearly.
4. Extraordinary Rendition
So, when does it start to become ordinary rendition? This administration program has us FedEx-ing unindicted fright suspects abroad for interrogation/torture. Khalid El-Masri, a German citizen, be shipped off to Afghanistan for such treatment and afterwards released without charges, base on some government confusion going on for his name. Heh heh. Canadian citizen Maher Arar claims he be tortured in Syria for a year, released minus charges, and cleared by a Canadian commission. Attempts to vindicate the rights of such men? You'd need to circle wager on to the state-secrets doctrine, above.
3. Abuse of Jose Padilla
First, he was, according to then-Attorney General John Ashcroft, "exploring a plan to build and explode a radiological dispersion device, or 'dirty bomb,' contained by the United States." Then, he was planning to blow up apartments. Then he be just bit of a vague apprehension conspiracy to commit jihad in Bosnia and Chechnya. Always, he be a U.S. citizen. After three and a half years, within which he was denied the most chief legal rights, it have now emerge that Padilla was any outright tortured or near-tortured. According to a recent motion, during Padilla's years of almost complete isolation, he was treated by the U.S. establishment to sensory and sleep deprivation, extreme cold, stress positions, threats of execution, and drugging with truth serum. Experts right to be heard he is too mentally damaged to stand trial. The Bush leadership supported his motion for a mental competency assessment, in hopes that will relieve prevent his torture claims from ever coming to trial, or, as Yale Law School's inimitable Jack Balkin put it: "You can't believe Padilla when he says we tortured him because he's crazy from adjectives the things we did to him."
2. The Military Commissions Act of 2006
This was the so-called compromise legislation that give President Bush even more power than he initially had to detain and try so-called rival combatants. He was substantially handed the authority to explain for himself the parameters of interrogation and torture and the responsibility to report upon it, since he'd be so good at that. What we allegedly did to Jose Padilla be once a dirty national secret. The MCA made it the directive.
1. Hubris
Whenever the courts push back against the administration's unsupportable constitutional ideas—ideas in the region of "inherent powers" and a "unitary executive" or the silliness of the Geneva Conventions or the limitless sweep of presidential powers during wartime—the Bush response is to repeat like peas in a pod chorus louder: Every detainee is the worst of the worst; every action taken is endorsed, necessary, and surreptitious. No mistakes, no apologies. No nuance, no regrets. This officially recognized and intellectual intractability can create the illusion that we are standing on duplicate constitutional ground we stood upon in 2001, even as that ground is sliding away below our feet.
You would do best to simply refer to their website.
http://aclu.org/about/index.html
Towns and cities near money. They look for Crosses or other Christian symbols and then sue the town/city to pilfer them down. The winner of the suit get paid court costs. This is how the leaches of the ACLU stay within business.
BTW, I lived in Clayton Georgia and the ACLU sued to hold a cross removed from Black Rock State Park. The City of Clayton had to discharge the legal fees to the ACLU.
There be a law passed within 1976 (Carter's administration) that allows them to do this crap.
I have question about the divorce procedure contained by Florida...?
1.) Is it true that one of the parties involved have to move out for the divorce to move forward?2.) If one of the parties involved does not want the divorce, what can that deputation do to stop it?
Answers: No, it is not necessary for one of the party to move out, although it is obviously for the best. Florida is a no-fault divorce state. One celebration can not stop the divorce...but if it is contested there is a long proceeding. It ends up costing A LOT of money.
i found out the sturdy way that if a couple lives contained by the same house even if it's in recent times a girlfriend, if she spends one day and hours of darkness in the house she can lay claim to it??? it's true and if the other creature does not want to sign the divorce papers or evades getting served with papers, basically go to court and hold a statement from the server stating that , the judge will usually a moment ago say the other party cannot be found and sign off on it. another trick is to distribute it to an address where they lived at years ago.
More Questions and Answers:
[2304] - [1940] - [2288] - [777] - [608] - [20] - [1286] - [1699] - [154] - [559] - [706] - [1979] - [612] - [2481] - [1796] - [293] - [578] - [2506] - [201] - [648]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: