Law Questions and Answers
Do you think this be fair?
i made a follower myspace for one of my teachers, (she didnt know untill it leak out) with my best friend, and it have absolutly nothing fruitless or harmful on it and it be only a kid, the next light of day i was sent to principals bureau (i blamed the whole entity on me and bailed my best friend out of trouble) and i had to sit surrounded by the "time out room", a 7' by 7' room full of broken chairs and old cruel desks with the door locked partly the time, and large humilitaing rope melsh covered wondows, with an annoying loud ticking hour slowly clock, for five hours all alone, and i have to miss the dance i be looking forward to. then i be suspended half of monday, they also give my best friend's overprotective mother a call merely because she was on the friends record, and now we cant see eachother approaching we used to all the time, do you give attention to all these concequences be really nessesary? they also made everyone on the friend list show their myspaces against their will, i dont reflect on this was objective, was it?Answers: It may hold been a short time overboard, but then, if you be the principle and had to ensure that everyone get the message loud and clear, would you make an example of the first perpetrator? Could it (your "fan" listing) lead to extermination threats etc., against a targetted teacher? Bottom string, there have to be consequences for our actions. And sometimes you run into situations for which within are no established guidelines or a policy.
Frankly, I have no problems near your punishment, except for the door being locked near you inside. This could be deadly surrounded by the case of a fire or similar emergency. Otherwise, messing near teachers is asking for trouble.
How can i get on franklincounty jail?
Answers: Are you asking about how you can access the trellis portal for the Franklin County Jail? If so, go here:
http://www.franklincountyjail.org/
What new california dmv law go into effect jan 1, 2008?
Answers: This contact should answer your question.
http://www.dmv.ca.gov/about/leg/leginfo.
Can not drive over .02% alchohol while driving
Good arguments agaisnt capital punishment?
any moral arguments against capital punishment?Answers: For me, at hand are three reasons why wealth punishment is wrong.
Firstly, it is "justice" based on revenge, pure and simple. Killing someone cannot morally be chunk of a "justice system". Eliminating a murderer's right to go does not bring the victim's rights back or enhance the right's of the victim's own flesh and blood and friends.
Secondly, why is modern day property punishment okay, but not in Nazi Germany, Iraq underneath Saddaam, Uganda under Amin, France beneath the radicals surrounded by 1792 - 95, the U.S. Cavalry as they cleared the Plains of the "red man", or Salem's hanging of witches. It is community (or state) sponsored murder. Community standards of the year in those places said it to be fine. It be wrong then. It is wrong immediately.
Thirdly, what if the wrong man or women is executed. I loathe to live in a society that would adopt the idea that the occasional mistake does not ring into question the morality and the integrity of the system. In Canada, I can describe numerous examples of people who be exonerated years after their wrongful convictions. If we had assets punishment they would be dead. Donald Marshall? David Milgaard? Steven Truscott? And contained by the U.S. there own been several studies commissioned that enjoy revealed the same mistakes. I wonder what go through those innocent men's minds in the closing few seconds of their lives?
Please don't conjecture I am some bleeding heart. I am not. These people cannot hoof it free in our society but for me, means punishment is a terrible crime surrounded by itself. I will not even entertain a discussion of the economics of means punishment. Saving money? It lessens the burden on taxpayers? Blah, blah, blah. People who enjoy this as their only or best use show where at hand hearts are . . . surrounded by there wallet.
Morality- Killing killers make more killers
Economics- It costs more money next to the appeals system to execute someone than to pay for him to live surrounded by prison his whole enthusiasm.
yes, it is not given often adequate.
meaning
two nation commit equally heinous crimes and one might get it and one might not
everyone on demise row knows another character who committed a crime that was waaaaaay worse that is to say NOT on death row
2. The cost of appeals is channel to expensive
3. The punishment is not carried out quick ample...so it is not really a true deterent. Granted, THAT person wont commit a crime again
An unwarranted legal system that discriminates against the poor (court appointed lawyer who are unskilled or lack the desire to really maintain the client)
DNA evidence has exonerated numerous convicted murderers.
And it's unsophisticatedly a barbaric approach to criminal justice.
IMMORAL - human go precious
WE GET IT WRONG SOMETIMES - u can get someone out of top-security prison, not out of death.
1. You can't let loose it if you made a mistake.
2. It is not uniformly applied.
3. It is not effective contained by preventing crime.
4. Life in prison is smaller quantity expensive.
5. Killing a person for slaughter a person does not construct sense.
You can't undo it if you excute an innocent character.
Organizations like the Innocence Project show that sometimes even the innocent bring to a close up on death row. Isn't the execution of 1 innocent soul too much?
The Innocence Project was founded surrounded by 1992:
"To date, 209 people within the United States have be exonerated by DNA testing, including 15 who served time on release row. These people served an average of 12 years within prison before exoneration and release. "
http://www.innocenceproject.org/
Plenty. Sources below.
You don't own to sympathize with criminals or want them to avoid a disastrous punishment to ask if the death cost prevents or even reduces crime and to judge about the risks of executing innocent general public.
126 people on loss rows have be released with proof that they be wrongfully convicted. DNA is available in smaller amount than 10% of all homicides and isn’t a guarantee we won’t execute innocent those.
The death cost doesn't prevent others from committing murder. No reputable study shows the death cost to be a deterrent. To be a deterrent a punishment must be sure and swift. The death cost is neither. Homicide rates are higher contained by states and regions that have it than surrounded by those that don’t.
We have a biddable alternative. Life without parole is very soon on the books surrounded by 48 states. It means what it say. It is sure and swift and rarely appealed. Life in need parole is less expensive than the destruction penalty.
The demise penalty costs much more than natural life in prison, mostly because of the allowed process which is supposed to prevent executions of innocent people.
The destruction penalty isn't reserved for the worst crimes, but for defendants next to the worst lawyers. It doesn't apply to general public with money. When is the final time a wealthy soul was on destruction row, let alone executed?
The release penalty doesn't necessarily backing families of murder victims. Murder martyr family member across the country argue that the drawn-out death cost process is painful for them and that life span without parole is an appropriate alternative.
Problems near speeding up the process. Over 50 of the innocent people released from destruction row had already served over a decade. If the process is speeded up we are sure to execute an innocent party.
About concealed carry of a firearm?
Lets read aloud you have a authorization to carry a concealed firearm...so you're carrying your firearm and it is 'concealed', however, what if by chance someone sees it...can you bring back into any trouble for that?Answers: Depends.
First, some states allow the open fetch of a firearm, like Colorado (with exceptions). Others, close to Florida, prohibit the open transport of a firearm (with exceptions). If you have a concealed weaponry permit, you should distinctly know the laws of your own state concerning this.
If you're in an unequivocal carry state, the subsequent question is: what be the circumstances of this "accidental" display of the firearm? There's a big difference between someone seeing the signature bulge of a pistol under a shirt while you are within line at the supermarket, as dead set against being within line at the guard.
Displaying a firearm which has the effect of scare someone is called "menacing" and can be a felony. If you accidently drop the firearm, while reaching for your checkbook while surrounded by line at the sandbank, you would probably frighten everyone there, and entwine up with a criminal court travel case that would cost huge legal fees, even if you return with acquitted. Alternatively, someone within line could hold a heart attack, and you'd be sued for negligence.
The bottom line: Someone near a concealed weapons warranty has a duty to properly conceal the weapon, contained by a way that its going to stay concealed, and not frighten family.
Further info can be found on websites like that sponsored by the National Rifle Association, concerning concealed missiles laws surrounded by various states.
Most of the time No, most of the time a concealed get permit will also allow you to open out carry, but it depends on the state.
http://www.carryconcealed.net/
http://www.handgunlaw.us/
http://opencarry.org/
Have a nice daylight.
Actually, it can be a HUGE problem depending on the jurisdiction you're in. In most states, concealed take means precisely that: don't consent to busybodies see or know that you're packing. It's always some Sarah Brady panicky nimrod near a cellphone, too...
Cops hate "man near a gun" calls, especially when it's some bonehead who should enjoy his concealed weapon...uh, concealed. You don't want to be put down and cuffed and embarassed.
Besides, you're giving up your tactical advantage if ethnic group can tell you're carrying. The singular time anyone should know is when you mean to produce it...which should be when you're contained by fear of your duration.
Good Attorney Wanted!!?
I am looking for an aggressive attorney that will fight for father rights. This attorney needs to be capable of practice in South Carolina. Please present me some references.Answers: Good luck near that. You will find many more poor ones than honourable ones.
lol what a way to find an attorney
Have you considered the washed out pages
My uncle is a attorney. His moniker is Tommy Pope. He could go by Tomas when it is work. He is apposite but i am unsure if he does fathers rights but it is worth looking him up.
Be scrupulous of what you ask for. you just might Get IT! Call the Local Chapter of the Bar Association or or check near the County Court House for a Local Lawyer Referral Service. These are usually located IN the County Court House itself. Tell them what you are looking for and they can Refer you to Lawyers in your Area that Handle your type of Case.
So you want a "good" Attorney. So what do you do? You post a quiz on yahoo answers! How many "good" Attorneys do you deem troll yahoo answers looking for clients!? There are Father's rights websites out there use your turn upside down engine find those websites and find your Attorney through them.
There are none. Most lawyers are broadsheet pushers and the rest are slime buckets. I suggest that you lookup cases similar to yours and see who had a successful outcome.
Contact the SC banister association. They have a legal representative referral service.
Is there an epedemic of porn,crime,private drugs,and moral degraduation?
has it become epedemic" threatening to overwhelm the u.s.a.??Answers: swot up how to spell
degraduation?
Is this explained god of the preamble ?
in respectively phrase of the preamble of a project you had to explain what respectively prhase meant, i dont caree going on for spelling errors in it immediately ill do spelll check nexti just want to know if it explained pretty economically
We as one whole, a big federation together. Us citizens of the United States of America. Meaning that we are one big country and we work together as a country, as a society. As in wise saying we created this constitution, and government, that it be not handed down from kings or queens, it be us, we the people.
To form a more idyllic union, try and product things better, make improvments on everything, try and clear everything to be perfect. Create a better goverment, and society, for every citizen within the United States, because nothing is ideal, but we need to try and put together it that way, not correct but more perfect. That they thought what they have was the best they could enjoy, until they realized they could strive for something better, try and product it more perfect.
Establish rights for the country, net laws set rules, and be paid it fair for the citizens. Create court systems and guidelines, to settle disputes and keep hold of our country in direct. We now can say aloud that every citizen has the opportunity for a neutral trial and for equal treatment. We enjoy our system of even-handedness because it's one of the most fairest in the world. We needed to establish sprite this way, so things would not turn out when england ruled over us.
To try and form peace throughout the United States, and between citizens, and even people from other countries. Try to hold on to peace at our homeland, and homes, so we will all attain along. When we started revolting against the state government,it be a shock to the system, like Shay's sedition.The keeping of the peace was on everyone's mind, and the conservation of tranquility at home was a prime concern. So the untried powers given to the federal government would try and prevent any such rebellion in the adjectives
To have inhabitants represent our country and defend for adjectives of us. To keep us undisruptive from outside attacks and defend us. We stipulation each other to survive and we can't conflict an attack on our own, we needed a organized army to defend us.
Help the citizens, look out for them. Don't create law and rules that are unfair and would wound the citizens. To allow every state and citizen of those states to benefit from what the government could provide. The point of have tranquility, justice and defense, be to promote the general welfare, it adjectives fits in near helping the citizens and looking out for the laws that would wound them.
To secure our freedom and self-determination, we were lucky to enjoy defeated the British. We want to keep it resembling this, make sure nil happens to our autonomy and freedom. We had fought rock-hard for this. We didn't want a queen or king again so we would have to look out for at hand own interest rather than ours. We looked-for citizens to look forward to being free, we looked-for to resemble a nation of liberty.We want to be sure that the adjectives generations of Americans would soak up the same.
This is presently the official esablishment of the law of the United States. That also the Constitution is "ordained" reminds us of the higher power involved here, not freshly of a single person or of a king, but of the family themselves. That is it now "established" reminds us that it replaces that which come before, such as the articles of confederation, and england ruling over us. That it is presently all leader.
Answers: The preamble is a summary of the intent of the framers of the Constitution.
and then we become a total capitalistic country run by capitalists. and adjectives that you have said become secondary to the outside edge of profit to stockholders and their returns,smiling all the course to the bank.nil wrong with capitalism except when making profit scheme more than its own people.
What is a Motion for Negotiation, the steps, description, this is for Circuit Court Defamation, Slander cases?
College lied on a student to Office Civil Rights and Plaintiff needs to know what Negotiation involves in the past asking to negotiate?Best answer receives the points.
Answers: You'd hold to identify the state and court involved. I've never heard of a Motion for Negotiation. Mediation, probably.
Absinthe is now court in the US..?
Why do individuals think that it is ok for absinthe to be permissible when it is said to cause hallucination, not to mention the many problems that come from alcohol?and why is weed still crooked when the only prearranged problems with it be the ones that people made up within the 30's and 40's ?
I'm just looking for opinion on this, thanks for any and adjectives responses!
Answers: an amended version of Absinthe is allowed contained by the US, without the wormwood extract... and hallucination are not the only side effects of it any...
No it is not legal--neither of them are. I have not see Absinthe in liquor stores.
By the agency, absinthe has a more adjectives name, "Panty remover."
Yes absinthe is presently legal, however here is a restriction on the amount of active ingredient that's allowed. Basically you will grasp drunk and pass out up to that time you will hallucinate on this stuff.
More Questions and Answers:
[374] - [1800] - [1642] - [1200] - [346] - [288] - [2088] - [984] - [1547] - [1295] - [2371] - [1873] - [2420] - [1157] - [2353] - [268] - [1620] - [1423] - [1349] - [875]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: