Law Questions and Answers

Are State Pensions paid surrounded by arrears or in credit?

Answers: In arrears, they are quick to thieve & slow to give!

I don't in actual fact know but take it from me as a ex civil-servant. Its establishment so it is collected in finance and paid surrounded by arrears.
You expected benevolence?

State pensions are rewarded every four weeks (ie. 13 payments for each calendar year) and they are compensated in arrears. You don't really expect any organization, let alone this lousy crew, to remuneration in credit, do you? After all, you might pop your clogs after they've compensated out and that wouldn't do, would it??

In arrears.

Oh yes, I remember now, "State Pensions" Thats be the Goverment gives it to us contained by the rear within adavance of our death

State Pension is in actual fact paid within advance. It is one of the few (if not only) state 'benefits' to be remunerated in this bearing.

That does not mean however that doesn`t matter what way you are rewarded it is all within advance. It is weekly within advance so if salaried 4 weekly would effectively be 1 week advance 3 weeks arrears and so on.

Well, I am an OAP, and I've never have any in credit, it's always be in arrears.

Paedophiles using the internet to abuse kids? STRICTER CONTROL REQUIRED ?

Is anybody else worried something like the number of young kids posting question on Yahoo Answers ( ie 12 and younger)..

it bothers me for two reasons.. ONE these kids repeatedly give their ages and locations .. and I am afraid that predators will use the information the kids supply to pretend that they are kids ...
and TWO ... I wonder how copious of these so called KIDS aren't in actual fact kids but the predators themselves

should Yahoo Answer's moderating staff be more mindful of such questions human being posted...?

Answers: The biggest problem with this is the anonymity of the those that use the internet due to the fact that the solitary communication source is what you see in a set book format on a computer screen. Many children don't come across to realize the potential for their information from their questions to be used to track them down and freely grant the info cause they seem to be to believe in their ignorance that no-one will hurt them.

Additionally the regulation of the users is effective impossible due to internet cafes and shared computers which trademark it highly doubtful that there will be focused age groups on the system.

The last thought i own is how many of these 'kids' could be bait for the predators i.e adults pretending that they are kids to try arrest the predators in the feat of trying to harm children or protectors who do track down the children to confer a warning to their parents.

i asked a similar put somebody through the mill and it was delete, i am gonna appeal
i also see many kids underneath 13 around here
but their parents should control them in first place
yahoo wrote the regulations because of their lawyer 'pressure

Yeah I know what you mean. Like next to myspace, and facebook. I feel if the parents are comfortable near their kids getting on these things. Then DON'T LET THEM. If you have adjectives sense you wont give information going on for yourself.
BE SMART KIDS.

So many kids deceit about their age a moment ago to post things on the internet. Parents should be watching their kids!!!!!

It's easier for one or two parents to monitor their own child's behavior than it is for the Yahoo staff to monitor everyone's children for them.

Education.

i don't know,. is it any different than letting your child walk alone?

If they play within a grownup area, suffer a grownup agony.

I find this question an interesting one. It is honest to be aware that predators are around however statistically speaking the most dangerous place for a child to be is the domestic home. This is because the human heart is so dark and illusive.

To anyone in the US or Canada next to knowledge of 'Good Samaritan Law'...?

How does this tenet deal near establishing a duty of care?

Answers: This canon does not require you to provide care or assistance for anyone. It protects a personality who in virtuous faith and to the best of their flair provides assistance to someone in distress. The standards might be difficult if the person rendering the aid have extensive medical training as compared to someone who didn't. For example,if I pulled you from a burning car and contained by the process your leg was broken,you can't sue me for that injury because I be,to the best of my ability and culture,trying to save your life span.
Your question is a touch broad so I hope this answered it a little.

It would depend on the situation, the whereabouts, and the state or province.

Your question is too unclear to answer.

The Good Samaritan law provides imperviousness for people rendering emergency assistance.
It requires citizens to provide whatever assistace they are trained to contained by case of emergency, in need worrying about prosecution.

if a hefty guy is robbed in broad daylight and in that is no danger motion picture it...it is deemed the greater fitting to do nothing and hold fat a-ss catch some exercise and walk to the police station to spread out a report and then own no money to buy big macs and fries. for the cost of 2 months supply of lipitor you can buy a years membership at a fitness club..

Why unsolved murders exist?

there shouldn't be any unsolved murders. I saw on a TV program more or less unsolved cases . The documentary showed that murder cases like 30 to 40 year weak still remain unsolved. Many of them from 1990's and 2000's too.

My question is how come the assassin can never be found since it is believed that every killer leaves some evidence or bit?

If the case remains unsolved next how will justice be given to the victim's kinfolk or friends?

Answers: Why? Because unfortunately, near are incredibly intelligent criminals that can get away from hiding the evidence, true they will donate evidence but trying to changing their identity or by wearing gloves to avoid having fingerprints, etc. they can escape the crime unsolved. Of course, if near was a lucky stroke of luck, if the target was kill by the criminal, then the martyr can become a ghost, while a surrounding substance can contact through the ghost, giving out the details, major the criminal to justice.

Gin Lawliet.

It's a great interrogate to ask.
there are even some that go beyond those years

But why??

On TV shows like C.S.I. and Law and Order, that is to say true. In real go, that is simply not true.

In abundant cases, there is little or no forensic evidence disappeared: fingerprints will be too heavily smudged to become unreadable (if they can be found at all), hair, fiber, and ballistics evidence will be inconclusive, etc.

Most of the TV technique you see (especially in audio and optical analysis and in finding and identify epithelial cells for DNA) are any grossly exaggerated from what really can be done or are simply invented by the TV writers for the sake of the plot.

Hence, unsolved murders will happen more frequently that you would expect them (or resembling them) to be.

For a person to be found guilty of a crime, the prosecution must prove his/her guilt 'beyond a probable doubt.' There is not always plenty evidence to prove this high horizontal of guilt. For example, if a gang member commits a crime, and adjectives the witnesses are terrified that if they reach a deal, they will get hurt (i.e. 'snitches gain stitches'), then it will be terribly difficult to get a witness to testify. There are tons of reason why there may be insufficient evidence for a criminal conviction, implication the case can never be 'solved' even though adjectives the cops and prosecutors are positive who committed the crime.

For example, a woman in my state be just tried for the third time for a murder, and the state may (or may not) try her a fourth time. (They hold been unqualified to get a unanimous judgment in any of the trials, so double jeopardy does not come into play.) If she is never found guilty, next this might be an 'unsolved' murder.

The world is not perfect, and unadulterated life is not approaching CSI and Law and Order.

Who do you think is the best giant profile criminal lawyer?

Answers: I would influence Denny Crane of Crane, Poole & Schmidt. ^_~

Either Uncle Bill, Ooops! That's Jusice Bill Gillard Q.C. OR David Galbally.

Natasha has be attacked by fred (example) causing her serious bodily injure, what is the role of the solicitor

and the barrister as well

Answers: It depends upon which side they're working. If they're representing Natasha, their dream is to seek the uppermost possible compensation. If they're working for Fred, it's to keep the amount low.

In systems which say a solicitor/barrister distinction, the solicitor does the pre trial work and the barrister tries the case.

soliciter and barrister are like thing. your interrogate is too vague - whose attorney are you asking almost?

Is this slander?

i am going thru a custody case my mother have told my ex that im unable to look after myself ,my children ,that im an alcoholic, thati lost my licence from drink driving,smashed my motor and my girlfriend wants to slaughter my kids and is a psycopath this has presently caused my ex to cut adjectives my contact with my 12yo son breaking my heart over the christmas time we are devastated this has happen they have also be showing court documents to people that arent involved within this case . we are inept to move back to the nouns as this is spread all around . What can we do ?

Answers: Ya i would hope thats not adjectives true!

If the statements of fact are false, it is slander.
If the statements of certainty are true, it it not slander.

For example, if you did lose your license because of a drunk driving conviction, this is a fact and cannot be slander. If you hold your license then it is slander.

Statements of feelings, like you are a doomed to failure parent, are much harder to prove as slander or not slander because defining a bad parent is not a crystal clear reality.

The court documents are a matter of public transcript so they can be shown to anyone.

Definitely this is the usual proceeding regarding custody fighting between two parents over their kids. The other parties which is your husband, his legal representative or lawyers will verbs up your previous past lives looking for wrong things you done surrounded by your previous lives and presenting them to the jury or the court to prove that you are not a GOOD mother to your kids.

Now you been asking, is this SLANDER? What is slander within the first place------slander or defamation of personality. In law, slander is the communication of a statement that makes a false claim, expressly stated or implied to be proper, that may harm the reputation of an individual, business, product, group, political affairs or nation. Most jurisdictions allow trial actions, civil and/or criminal, to deter a mixture of kinds of slander and retaliate against groundless criticism.

The common tenet origins of defamation slouch in the torts of slander (harmful statement surrounded by a transitory form, especially speech) and libel (harmful statement in a fixed environment, especially writing but also a picture, sign, or electronic broadcast), each of which give a common tenet right of action.

"Defamation" is the broad term used internationally, and is used surrounded by this article where it is expendable to distinguish between "slander" and "libel". Libel and slander both require publication. The fundamental distinction between libel and slander lies solely in the form surrounded by which the defamatory situation is published. If the offending material is published surrounded by some fleeting form, as by spoken words or sounds, sign language, gesture and the like, later this is slander. If it is published in more durable form, for example surrounded by written words, film, compact disc (CD), DVD, blogging and the resembling, then it is considered libel.

Since I presume that the claim of you one alcoholic, loosing your license from drunk driving, girl friends who like to wipe out your kids could be construed by court to be TRUE. Even if you vehemently denied this summons, the court believe that in our younger years as a teenagers we done lots of wrongful act, nobody could deny that even your president George Bush admitted he smokes marijuana during his college years. But the word PSYCHOPATH is to be considered to be evaluated next to medical documents & findings before it could be rank as true by the court.

Then fight rear with your own PROOF that you be stable ever since, and you are doing the best that you could to provide decent living for your own kids inspite of those prosecution you need witnesses show the court proof of your own claims, your legal representative will do this for you. Unless you could show the court something,then you might loose your kids next to your ex husband. The court is just doing the best of their proficiency to provide the best care for your kids, but you cannot show your the best later they have no other choice but to award them to your ex husband.

Nope this is NOT slander surrounded by the true sense of the word.

Do you agree that a flight should be diverted due to alleged groping of a female passenger?

Should the flight own continued its course and police contacted before landing instead of diverting the entire flight?

Michael Lamar Holland, 46, appeared earlier a magistrate on Monday on a charge of abusive sexual contact, according to Ted Hresko, special agent contained by charge of the Pittsburgh air marshals' department.

A witness saw Holland stroking the woman's hair while she be trying the sleep, according to an affidavit filed near the court. Moments later, Holland fondled the woman who repeatedly object and tried to get away from him, the affidavit said.

Answers: At first I somewhat agreed w. you and if the flight be somewhat empty possibly they could have wait.

But of course liability would be a big issue for the airline. Other passenger could say they feel concern for their personal safety. The woman who be groped could have said she be as well.

Or if the guy go to court and was found not guilty because near is reasonable doubt (he be talking to her) next he could sue the airline and go after the command. If it was 6:00 when they vanished Dulles and they landed contained by PA the flight had not be in the upper air that long so sleeping or trying to when coffee and such is being given out is unlikely. She be "trying" makes something iffy. What be they chatting about? Maybe she be fine with the fuzz stroking but flipped when he grabbed something else. Not defending him but court is court and you never know.. witness or not.

The Air Marshall would not know how to attend to any other problems while he is watching this guy. Plus it does make sense that if terrorists required to out the Air Marshall some minor distubance would be the way to do it.

So contained by thinking about it I focus they did the right thing.

if they do not resolve the issue onboard, next they will need to be diverted i believe.

but if its resolved by the stewardess next theres no need to divert

They should hold landed at the closest airport and the man removed/arrested.

Is the feminine passenger supposed to have to sit and capture molested by a stranger so you can make your total admission money on time?

So what would you do when he followed you to the bathroom and raped you. You enjoy no way of knowing if he is going to pinch it to the next horizontal.

I'm sure if you were the woman stuck on an airplane with this guy molesting you - you would not want to verbs the flight being sexually assaulted freshly so the strangers on the plane can make it prompt.

The bad guy here is not the airline or the woman - but the pervert who felt resembling he should be allowed to molest a stranger.

Well, if it were me trying to receive the guy to leave me alone, I would abhor to think I have to endure the entire flight approaching that.

I am not familiar near this news story, but if the plane land in establish to deal beside this problem, then yes, that be the right thing to do. Even if it weren't me mortal groped, I would hate to judge some other person be having to matter with that for the entire flight.

**EDIT**
Lots of things "coulda" and conceivably "shoulda" been done. But they weren't. Men didn't procure up and subdue the groper. Apparently there be no air marshalls on the train (or none that were aware of the groping situation), and so, it was right that the flight be diverted. Sorry for everyone else's inconvenience, but a crime was mortal committed.

Considering the place was destined for Seattle I deduce it was appropriate for the plane to divert and hold the offender removed.

As a passenger I would hold been irritated at the hindrance, but understand the stipulation for airplane security. Too several bad things could enjoy happened on a 5 hour flight to the pacific northwest. The nouns marshal on the plane (sorry scruffycat, your info be wrong in your answer) have no idea of the mental or criminal history of the guilty party. If the guy had gone nuts somewhere over Chicago and hurt the heavens marshal or other passenger, people would be screaming "Why didn't they divert the plane and achieve rid of the guy?" As a liability issue they did the right thing. I have a feeling sorry for everyone on board.

adjectives depends all Air Space Regulations and Safety of the Passengers. Air Marshall assumed the accuse person have different intention. Since Sept 11 - The Authorities imposed many law that would have prevented or detected untimely threat and safety of the passenger, that includes divert,delay of the flights..etc inopportunely!

What can an unpaid seller due to a businesses insolvency do?

If a small business supplies produce to another small business, and the small business becomes insolvent past the goods are salaried for, what can the unpaid seller do?! (buyer have possession of goods)

Answers: Stand in file and hope that some portion of the debt will be paid.

Bring an feat for return of the goods.

Do you know your rights?

Answers: not all of them but i do know greatly of lawyers to help out me!

I know my rights and my lefts.

Actually, I don't. I've never taken the time to read them.

Too many those "know their rights" but fail to appreciate that next to right comes responsibility.

That's half the problem next to this country today.

I know many of my rights..
mind you
I also know heaps of my responsibilities..

I know many of rights, but indubitably not all of them.

I doubt anyone can truly know adjectives their rights as it would require spending much time in continuing research to stay current. For most nation it's just not that soaring of a priority. For most people surrounded by the world, surviving is a full time job. And even by American standards where on earth survival is taken for granted, people own work, families and other defining things taking up their time. As long as people are familar near their basic rights that should do I think.

It is dependant the armour
but all must i know

Yes I do. I would suggest everyone but a pocket size copy of the Constitution of the United States. Most book stores own them or you may be able to achieve one on line for free, from a administration web site. Most colleges that own a criminal justice program may hold them for sale, usually the cost is in the region of $5.00. It is a graet reference and also you can move about online and look up or buy your state statutes book, then you know where on earth you really stand.

Yes, and I actively protect them every single day.

There's a small town that I hold to drive through daily that sets up DUI checkpoints several times a week. I don't drink and drive so that's not a hassle by itself but the butthead cops ALWAYS ask to look surrounded by my trunk EVERY time. Of course I refuse EVERY time and they ALWAYS formulate a stink about it. The really stupid point is that they've had several drug busts of idiots who give permission for the look into! If they had stood their ground they'd never own been busted!

The with the sole purpose thing I know is that the more rights I.
receive the less someone else will hold.
Think about that

Human rights? yeah.
Rights as a citizen? yeah
Rights if I'm arrested? yeah

This could be in motion on a while :-)

Evidently I know more of my rights than many of the above posters.
BTW ancestors, your federal constitutional rights are only the establishment. Your state constitution probably grants you even more rights. Check your state constitution out and you might be surprised.

More Questions and Answers:
[1801] - [634] - [936] - [1908] - [704] - [458] - [1332] - [1692] - [940] - [522] - [2292] - [2185] - [2396] - [760] - [640] - [1026] - [1445] - [1144] - [1278] - [806]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: