Law Questions and Answers

What is common regulation?

of UK
Answers: That part of the English decree not embodied in legislation. It consists of rules of regulation based on adjectives custom and usage and on judicial (court) decisions. English adjectives law become the basis of regulation in the USA and several other English-speaking countries.

Common law developed after the Norman Conquest 1066 as the regulation common to the integral of England, rather than local regulation. As the court system became established lower than Henry II in the 12th century, and judges' decision became record in decree reports, the doctrine of precedent developed. This means that, surrounded by deciding a unique case, the court must own regard to the principles of imperative laid down in ahead of time reported cases on the same, or similar points, although the statute may be extended or varied if the facts of the faddy case are sufficiently different. Hence, adjectives law (sometimes call ‘case law’ or ‘judge-made law’) keeps the statute in arpeggio with the wishes of the community where no legislation is applicable or where on earth the legislation requires interpretation.
Common law is decree developed through the courts, i.e. through the judges. Also agreed as Case law, and settle made law.

It is the doctrine of Stare Decis (latin for 'let the outcome stand') that allows judges decision to form law binding on the country and courts below it (i.e. Common law). Obviously the difficult the court, the stronger the precedent.

One of the reasons is to ensure consistency within the law. Without covering law, one and the same cases could go earlier the court and could have different outcomes. Another is (and is the crucial point in my mind) to do beside when a case comes to court and the legislation is blurry or silent on a certain nouns. Common law allows the courts to receive the law as they stir along, which allows for the law to develop quicker and easier to get together the changing wishes of society. Also it gives the courts a tool to concordat with areas of imperative that are not obvious (which to be tolerant are going to be the only areas that form it to the Court of Appeal and House of Lords). Some whole areas of tenet for example were created by adjectives law, such as Murder. Murder is a adjectives law crime, the singular interferrence by a statute comes in the 1957 Homicide Act which provides partial buttresses. The tort of negleigence was created by adjectives law as in good health.

So short answer, Common law is imperative made by judges through their decision in cases. Not so short answer is that it is a tool to allow the courts to collect the changing requests and views of society. (for example the covering of R v R in 1990/1991, surrounded by which the House of Lords FINALLY decided that it be possible for a husband to rape his wife)
basically it is a regulation which isnt covered by a specific act of parliament, but is still binding

Is there a website or other resource which have the laws for every state?

I am trying to look up the law for possession of burglary tools (without intent to commit burglary). The problem is that each state have a different law, within some states it is illegal individual if you are commiting another crime or have shown intent to commit burglary, and surrounded by some states it is just downright dishonest to possess them without a locksmith license. Does anyone know a site or something that I can only download a pdf of the laws for respectively state, or are there simply too masses to be listed contained by one convenient location like that? Any and adjectives help appreciated!
Answers: solely effective track is to go to the state code for respectively state
FindLaw.com is a pretty good resource. It might be a flawless place to start.

Is it now permitted for someone in Antiqua to market &/or distribute music and movies regardless of US copyright?

World Trade Organization allows Antigua to ignore US$21 million of US copyright per year.

Would it be permissible for someone from Antiqua to set up an internet shop offering music, movies, games, etc?
Answers: Even if it were so, it would be wrong for an American to buy from them. The music industry also goes after relations who download stolen music from foreign sites.
Answer: If your point is that the World Trade Organization is Anti-American then ably DUHH!
Those U.N. types Hate America's Republic/Capitalism...whole industrialist nouns thing.
The Kyoto/ Man Made intercontinental warming is nil more than a Criminal Enterprise by the third world, to rob, steal, and rape their industrialized betters!
Seems to be a pattern near.
Hey! Even if it is not, stay there and try it for a while...the display and the weather are Great!

Could a person enjoy the abilty to..?

turn invisible
control things w/ ur mind
ect.
Answers: tina, great to hear from you and happy trial year!
i do not think anyone have the ability to turn
invisible, but abundant years ago, israeli uri gelller was
competent to bend forks etc... with the power of his mind.
he be the rage of his sunshine and time.
i feel a tiny per centage of empire are gifted
and own the ability to do that. here is something
i reckon you will get a see out of. a group of
snobbish intellectuals, very small surrounded by number
invited me to join their group and i have to let them
know inside 48 hours. i did not bother to reply.
thanks for contacting me and GodBless.
Stay out of the politics and senate section.
I'm sure there's a kiddie piece you can go to.
When you find there, stay nearby.
In a way, we are invisible to respectively other on this site!
Some soldiers (special forces) are trained in camouflage and movement to become invisible surrounded by practical terms.
You can't control objects near your mind.
May I suggest that your imagination is good plenty for you to be a novelist (instead of a politician)?
haa i hope not.
lol
:)
Its been proven that family can do many things next to their minds, but turning invisible?.well I dont expect its possible.

Anyone know the California or federal law in relation to storage and access to narcotics in a hospital?

I take place to know of a nurse that openly admit she gives the key to the medication room to unlicensed staff so that they may get 'other' items stored surrounded by the med-room. I know this is against a few hundred corporate policies, but I need to see if near is a specific law stating that unlicensed staff cannot hold unsupervised access to where narcotics are kept.
This is a problem that could potentially cost us our job on an upcoming inspection.
Answers: law is not the issue policy is. the nurse is justifiably responsible for the meds if the nurse gives key to anyone and something is missing that nurse will be held accountable. report the nurse to the nursing supervisor. this nurse is putting her license at risk as very well as her job and could possibly effect the opportunity of others he/she works with. the nurse must inventory and sign for adjectives narcotics under their control at every shift correct.
if this nurse did happen to hold a "drug problem" and was stealing or failing to properly dispense meds this is an flowing way to try and blame someone else. the nurse can immediately claim she let someone contained by med room for some other supply and hey stole narcotics. the company would most likely still call a halt the nurses employment for failing to follow policy but the nurse just might be capable of keep their license.
report the nurse presently!!!

Divorce HELP....!!!!!!!!!!!!!!?

I live in GA and want to evacuate to move Back to FL can my husband stop me if we have kids?
Answers: Are you dictum you're taking the kids before the court defence is final? If that's the case, he can gain an emergency ruling in family circle court to keep you surrounded by state until the custody is settled, yes.

Why the rush? Can you get your divorce finalized and after work out the move? Kids have adequate pain over this, I'm sure, don't label it worse for them.
The only instrument you can move with the kids is if you enjoy Full Custody or if your husband agrees with it, If he does agree next u need to enjoy that in writing or contained by your divorce papers.

Also if your kids are of age I believe in GA they hold to be at least 12 or 13 next they can decide who they want to live next to,


Good Luck

Is is appropriate for a Director to slap or beat the actress out of anger?

Apparently the actress didn't exploit properly or made a mistake, so the director went straight to her and slapped her. He claims nearby was nought wrong about his schedule - he says of late like we slap our kids or youngsters if they sort a mistake, she also deserved a tight slap for her mistake.

No legal doings was taken against him - be this correct of him to do that?
Answers: a father beats his child but give his assets to him.

ask the actress to claim for the director's assets if he justifies his goings-on as a father's reaction for a mistake done by child.
Was is a slap to the obverse or the butt? And what kind of movie. X-rated?

Seriously, she probably desires the job, so she's stuck. It sucks, but he should be sued and/or jailed.

But, consequently again, did she enjoy it...I'm horrible.
Oh, come on. You KNOW that wasn't correct. It be assault and battery, plain and simple. But if the actress doesn't swear out a complaint, how be there supposed to be "permissible action"?

BTW, it's assault even if a parent does it to a child, but in that casing someone other than the child can swear out the complaint.
no ! no road
he doesn't hav any right to do dat
NO!

It is never a correct response to hit someone because you do not like what they do or are doing especially within the workplace.

Consider this:

In the workplace an innapropriate touch is a slap, hit or any contact stemming from anger or frustration. A touch in an overtly sexual outlook is also a violation. This is in recent times the tip of the iceburg when it comes to harrassment in the workplace. Even if the element is an unpaid part within a play for a charity, school or public event it is still considered the workplace.

Let them gain away with it once and you are clich¨¦ it's "ok". The part or the errand is not worth lowering your standards as a human being.

v
If she have witnesses, that will help her crust. It will be hard for the conciliator if it is just her word versus his.

Photos of bruising could assistance too.
No

The director might have lost his resentment out of many take,
I am dam sure he will never dare even to rase his voice or slap if the youngester be the daughter of Rajani/kamal of super heroine Sredevi/Hema.
If it were Jennifer Lopez or Angelina Jolie, I feel it would be okay. Otherwise, I think it's a unpromising idea.

But conceivably it was within her contract!

Happy New Year!
That is wrong. This is just not right.
The director deserves punishment for that.
no it be certainly not correct as he is violate her human rights.It is a free country but his freedom ends where her cheek begin, if he was so upset in the order of her acting he should have fired her fairly than assault her.His behaviour be extremely childish, immature and volatile.If someone be to slap him he would most certainly consistency offended and it is also the actress fault she did not retaliate at once.Self dignity should other come before anything else even occupation, it would be better to leave the picture than work for such a provocative director who manhandles and mistreats when angry.Today he slapped surrounded by anger what will he do tomorrow? These people should be skilled a lesson as if he doesn't have the chief upbringing and respect for a woman it shows what kind of a downtrodden degenerate person he must be and such culture do not deserve a place in society
No, he shouldn't even tell off & insult loudly in public. None is his slave but it is see in Bollywood that at the time of shootings at mount stations near Mumbai, the directors get the actress stripped of all clothes to be changed by masculine helpers on the sets to free time.

Wardrobe malfunctions, eve reasing & so copious indecent reamrks are common things during rehearsals surrounded by indoor shootings in Indian studios. Frequent rapes too are arranged. Recently, a monor cine actress Hema of 17 for regional language(Marathi) films was repeatedly raped. None is spared surrounded by this field, according to Shakti kapoor, a filmstar of Bollywood, India who even took the name of the male member who had sex near female filmstars Rani Mukherjee & Preeti Zinta until that time their debut in Hindi films.

Legally, in that is no regulatory authority to prevent all such horrible things at tiniest in India.
If the actress does not own the strength of character to report the incident for distress that it might affect her career weakly, i 'd say she deserved what she get.
If one will do anything for money they are a prostitute, just that their price is much high than regular ones!
noo.hez mad n crazy to do dat
d actress is more nutty 2 let him step away wid dis offence
Yes, he have to let her know who's contained by charge and that he is not going to put up her shenannigans. I would beat hell out of her and later fire her.

Why is porno allowed on the internet?

The internet is supposed to be for education.
Answers: It's call "freedom." If the government can whip away from the Internet that which you do not like, consequently they can take away that which you do approaching, as well.

I'm anti censorship, so long as no one is harmed within creating the product which some would censor. I am opposed to child porn, though, as the children are appreciably being harmed.

The other point is, how could you ever stop it? The Internet is commonly prearranged as the World Wide Web. This is because we have access to indistinguishable things the rest of the world does. How could we prevent people from access porn, if the porn is being hosted surrounded by Europe, Asia, Africa, Australia, or South America?

So if you don't like porn, don't look at it. But don't try to cart away the rights of those who do want to look at it. Freedom, after all, is what it's adjectives about. Right?
Free speech.

"The internet is supposed to be for schooling." - Not sure where you come up with this opinion, however that statement is not true.

"My town wants to impediment it on the internet." - Not a possibility in the US. Not sure where on earth you live. May be allowed there.

"We be told if anyone looks at dirty pictures we (All) will be thrown in sentence to prison. - Again, not a possibility in the US. May be court in your country to throw empire in reformatory for another person's crime.
Because it's legal.

"The Internet is supposed to be for education"

No it isn't. The Internet be first built for national defense. It was a bearing for the different military facilities to enjoy a distributed method of communication after a nuclear attack. Later the big universities be allowed to "piggy-back" on the system, and eventually it came to be the unambiguous system it is today.

"my town wants to block it"

Where do you live - Tehran ?

It's not illegal to look at decriminalized adult porn on the internet. Any city ordinance attempting to prevent mature residents from doing something legal contained by the privacy of their own home would be unconstitutional in the US.

The problem near asking the government to proscription things that you don't like is that we adjectives dislike different things. There are people who own tried to get the organization to ban religious content from the Federally regulated airwaves as a defiance of the establishment clause.

Maybe your neighbours would like to see porn debarred from the 'net - but if you accept that the governing body has the right to shut down sites it disapproves of, would you still have a feeling the same route if they decided to shut down adjectives Christian sites?

Richard
The internet is not just for lessons. It for ever thing, from shopping to getting directions to porn.

A town can brand name a law and try to stop porn from getting contained by, but they can not arrest everyone, because of one person. they can not let somebody know people they can not enjoy porn in their own house. They can block it from public internet places but thats it. What you do contained by the privacy of your own house is up to you.
Not sure how everyone could be locked up for ONE person viewing pornography. There may be some rule on files that if you are caught looking up porn that YOU could be sentenced, but I don't think that applies to the rest of your town.

I guess within a sense many nation want to VIEW the Internet as being for tutorial purposes. But I don't think nearby was every any mandate that said YES IT IS ONLY TO BE USED FOR EDUCATION. Period.

Your town cannot stop what is individual put on line. Just isn't possible.

Free speech is one entry that protects porn on the Internet. Like it or not free speech protects pretty much ALL types of speech, even those that many race disagree with.
Understand that this poster is a troll. They own a habit of posting ridiculous question.

Notice their Q&A's are private? Sign of the troll.
internet is not FOR education, its more for information exchange and commerce, but if somebody happen to get learned...

Wrongful Termination?

I worked for an at will company for 3 years. I was fired over 6 min away from my desk. How can I hold the admin of company for wrongful termination. I felt close to I was completly blind sided.. I be fired before christmas. I cannot dream up of any other reason of that I am a Black man. Please relieve.. I only own 21 days to sign off on a severence bundle.
Answers: If you sign off on the severance carton do you lose your right to sue? Are you treated differently in other respects from non-black personnel? What you can do is file a complaint beside the EEOC (federal) or the Human Rights Division of your state's Department of Labor. As an African-American, you are a member of a protected class. If your firing be racially motivated, the EEOC or Human Rights Division will file a lawsuit for you. At the deeply least, they will launch an investigation to see if your company promotes cultural inequality. If you cannot think of any judgment except your race, sort the company prove a legitimate root. Some of the answerers seem to be accusing you of playing "the see card" for no reason. I don't see it that method. All we can do is take your sound out at face good point. You stated you know of no reason except your see. Therefore, file the informal complaint near the EEOC or Human Rights Division. You have nought to lose. You have already be fired, so they cannot retaliate against you. If you were fired for tribal animus, you have a duty to society to ask that this wrong be re-dressed and stopped from going on to anyone else.
being contained by an "at will" does not mean that they can fire you for newly anything. they must have a explanation for your termination, cutting pay for with no intent to rehire, poor undertaking performance, despoliation of policy, closure of office or facility.
they can not cancel just because of see, creed, nat origin, sex, age et-cetra. you want to find out in writing why you are anyone terminated. since you are being offered a severance pack it his highly unlikely you will enjoy any recourse. severance packages are a perk not a requirement by law.
contact your local department of labor enforcement they can answer your questions and directory a claim against this employer if there have been any benevolent of violation of the canon. you do not need to want legal counsel as so several are so quick to read out. a lawyer can do nought more for you then the labor department,
later after labor department is done and if they determine you were fired for a discriminatory purpose you seek a legal representative and go after them for damages.
Oh God..how long until J.J and A.S arrive on the scene?

Again, racism self perpetuated.
One of the most important things to remember is that what you can do depends on where you live and what the applicable law are. You need to look into that, which is probably best done by getting professional allowed input. What follows is not that professional input -- it is just some rough knowledge that might assist get you started. Please capture help from an attorney if you settle on to pursue this.

So then: As you beyond a shadow of a doubt already know, employment-at-will (pretty much) means that any the employee or the employer can call off employment at any time. Generally this can be done at least for angelic reasons. Some places allow termination for upright reasons and for famine of reasons; others allow it for correct reasons, withdrawal of reasons and impossible reasons alike. You inevitability to figure out where on earth your situation lies and what kind of jurisdiction you're within.

Still, in most places, injustice is not taken to munificently, and firings from at-will employment that violate concepts of justice probably won't be in motion over well. Usually this will start if there seem to be more of a contract than just something provisional -- sometimes called an implied contract -- or if the firing violate public policy, which it seems is your concern here.

What you might want to do is review your contract, if you enjoy one, for the terms of your employment. Find out why you be fired, if you can. Then, if you're still concerned, seek sustain from a legal professional, someone who know the applicable law.
Generally, a severance bunch makes an member of staff sign over his/her rights to sue the company for money. Depending on your situation and the laws of your state, your rights to sue may be worth little or nought. Again, in broad an employee can sue below laws of federal nouns (www.eeoc.gov), pay issues (www.dol.gov) and your local states human rights law (see your state's human rights dept/commission/group website.

You mention that you are black, if you can prove that you were treated negatively because of your see, you might be able to report a complaint with the EEOC. In command to prove that you would have to point to an hand in a same/similar duty who under same/similar circumstance be not fired and was not black. To wallet an EEOC complaint you can go directly to the EEOC or enjoy an attorney do the work. The EEOC then investigates and tries to gain the employer to come up with a settlement -- no guarantees and no getting the assignment back.

What you obligation is to find a local employment attorney who can review your case, your severance documents, and recommend you what you are giving up. It will cost you some fee, but at most minuscule that way you will know for sure.
I'll not pretend to know the aim for your termination as it isn't relevant. You stated you work in a state where on earth employment is at the will of the employer: you can be terminated with or minus cause.

Sign bad on a severance package? if you benefit from signing past its sell-by date on the package, sign bad on it ASAP. AS soon as you leave their employment, and you should receive the severance bundle before you leave---sign up for laying-off benefits as soon as possible.

Important: What to do right now-- have a really honest resume drawn up by a wordsmith that will make you look better than Santa Claus and Will Smith combined. There are deeply of ways to make even the most mundane quals look certainly magnificent.

Do not leftovers your time trying to protest the termination---hire a really good-- and do this now too--- in good health connected scalp-hunter to find you a new opportunity ASAP. Have your fancy resume ready--Stipulate, to the scalp hunter, you minimum employment requirements (at least 20% more remuneration than before, health/hospital/medical benefits, sick sign out, paid vacation, required training at company expense, travel or limited travel or no travel, advancement from inside and opportunity for advancement, and etc.--you know the gig)

Trust me on this: this is an opportunity for advancement. A really professional resume and a great scalp hunter are very likely investments---you work for money---this is how you get the best matter. I know guys who plan to move on to better job every three years--its a common method of climbing the corporate ladder. Your timing is perfect, so, Get-er-Done.
If the company feel you were spending too much time away from your desk, they hold every right to fire you.

That's what "at will" means; they can fire you anytime for any intention.

As for playing the race card, I don't consider that's a good belief.and the fact that you worked for them for 3 years would prove otherwise.
Ah yes, play the "Black" card.

Could it be that your assignment somehow is based upon you mortal at your desk, perhaps answering phones? Giving directions?

If your duty is one that someone must relieve you before you can go away your desk, it does not matter HOW long you be gone if someone did not relieve you, they are justified within firing you.

If your work is "at will" they could have fired you for any sense. Poor sales requiring a running down in staff, you be rude to a customer and yes, you were away from your desk for six minutes.

But by adjectives means, play the "Black" card. That will conspicuously encourage them to hire another "Black" contained by the future. (This is sarcasm.)
You might be capable of do something because you are black. That is discrimination. Good Luck.

Can someone take their money wager on?

if someone puts a sum of money into your bank picture, can they take it fund?
Answers: No, no-one has access to your mound account unless it is a unified account or if they capture a hold of your card and pin. You can deposit money into anyone's account but you cannot annul even if it's money that you put there.

If your employer is direct depositing your side they have no access to annul only to deposit and if you own direct debit set up then they would individual be taking money from you not putting money in so...
Yes and No, If its not your's , yes, if it is yours, No ,
If you get over paid by read aloud welfare yes, or any other State agency, I,R,S, Yes
Now if some one gave you some money , Say A friend .. NO
But You know what really happen so its up to you to do the right thing , ? Happy New Years

More Questions and Answers:
[364] - [1715] - [1258] - [1181] - [1738] - [535] - [689] - [1513] - [833] - [2057] - [330] - [1753] - [911] - [2541] - [533] - [905] - [920] - [515] - [2299] - [355]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: