Law Questions and Answers

Does anyone know about the B.Y.O.B. Laws within Tarrant County Texas?

Opening a business and want customers to be able to bring their own "Drinks"
Answers: I'm not sure what your query is. As a general situation, the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission (TABC) does not regulate BYOB establishments. The TABC must followed the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code, which provides no reference to the regulation of BYOB establishments.

You should know how to operate your business without a certification or license from the TABC.

For more information, you should contact the TABC. Their website is below.

http://www.tabc.state.tx.us/
well within my town everyone B.Y.O.B.'s to everywhere so idk .
just thought ya similar to to kno

How can I sue an assistant county attorney?

This person transparently lied to a judge to block my termination of probation. She made one mistake. She thought I would not mind. I have re-motioned and quality I will be vindicated. My power is that I have be 100% compliant and am in the driver form. I want to get her fired to set an example for a corrupt county attorney organization. How do I sue her for slander or whatever on a personal spring?
Answers: You can't.

She has entire immunity from suit for schedule taken in the course of her employment.

You can directory a complaint with her boss.

Richard
Can't be done. Things said during court proceedings cannot be sued on for slander. Otherwise, everyone would sue over the court proceedings, and things would come to a grinding halt.

The best you can do is go to the DA/County Attorney beside your case. He can fire her. But probably won't since it will appear to the sensible person that she be mistaken and not that she was intentionally doing wrong. Especially if you backfire at your next motion audible range.

** Note: This is a general discussion of the subject business of your question and not permissible advice. Local law or your particular situation may progress the general rules. For a specific answer to your press you should consult legal counsel beside whom you can discuss all the facts of your valise. Answering this question does not indicate an attorney-client relationship. **
Although you cannot sue the attorney, another preference that you have is file a complaint with the State Bar (of anything state you are in) against the attorney for an ethical violation.

This will subject to the attorney to an investigation, and, if your claim have merit, possible professional discipline.
Previous responders have outlined the "imperviousness from prosecution" enjoy by prosecutors.

However, contained by addition to file a gievance, with plenty of documentation, near the Bar Association of your state, may I suggest another route to insure the integrity of the democracy where you reside?

Approach this concern with the County Commissioners or County Board member. They are the ones who sign the checks for the ADA & Prosecutor.

Make your argument non-hysterical & fact-laden.

The County Commission is elected & therefore subject to the pressure of public assessment expressed by voters.

Take this matter to the local medium.

If this ADA is a liar, probability are you're not the first victim.

Possibly that ADA is waiting to step into the Prosecutor's form when that person go away (retirement, election to referee, conviction, etc.), so plan a long campaign to be the undoing of this alleged prevaricator.

Good luck! Our county is within the throes of a similar battle, near many angry citizens trying to oust a former incompetent ADA, who have since been appointed DA.

It's be bloody, but it's not over!

Personal Injury after Hit and Run accident?

I be in a MVC on 12-19-07, I be hit on the passenger side rear, spun multiple times befor stopping. I suffered bruised ribs, hip, and a Lumbar strain. The Other driver have ran a red wishy-washy when she hit me. She left the sceen, but returned subsequent to recover her license plate. She told the Officers that she be asleep at the wheel, and didnt know what she hit, so she not here. I went to the ER, and be released. Her insurance Company is covering the car repairs, a rental motor, and my medical bills. I am a Paramedic, and my job requires that I am competent to lift 300 lbs near my partner, I went vertebrae to work on 12-27-07, on my first call have a Pt. that was 250 lbs, and I have extream lumbar pain when lifting, go home, then to Dr. the following time, I am now on a 30 lbs elevate restrick for 30 days. I am going to be out $2000 in wages, if I am competent to return to work after the 30 days. there Ins. desires to offer me $800 for affliction and suffering, what should I do? What am I entitled?
Answers: You should see a personal injury attorney right away. Most, if not adjectives, will take your valise at no charge to you and only filch fees out of any final recovery.

The longer you keep on to see an attorney the more difficult it is going to be for you to cover your lost wages, etc. The facts sound resembling you will have a pretty solid baggage. There are certain steps you stipulation to be taking now to ensure that you are protecting your interests within a future settlement or result.

Look online for an attorney referral service from your county bar association to find a dutiful attorney.
Get a lawyer and walk to trial. Obviously, the person who hit you have insurance. You get a legal representative and sue thier insurance company.

From what you say you enjoy very apt case next to substantial damages you should not have trouble getting counsel. Insurance policies usually hold maximums. In the State of CA every driver is required to enjoy $30,000 at least surrounded by liability insurance. Get a good contingency advocate and sue her insurance company. Do it ASAP and do not sign anything from the other driver's insurance company until your lawyer have reviewed it.

Only licensed lawyers can distribute legal insist on. I am not a lawyer. This post should not be construed as permissible advice. Get a licensed advocate to represent you ASAP!
Yes, get a PI legal representative on plaintiff's side. That should take vigilance of the accident.

But your work injury is one you probably enjoy to file a workers' comp claim on. I know you focus that you were within a weakened condition (and probably were) due to the collision, but the certainty of the matter is that your restriction didn't take place until after your work.

If you can get your Dr. to certify that you should own been fixed in lifting (doubtful) after the stroke of luck, you may be able to bring it beneath the PI case.

** Note: This is a nonspecific discussion of the subject matter of your interrogate and not legal guidance. Local laws or your faddy situation may change the broad rules. For a specific answer to your question you should consult permissible counsel with whom you can discuss adjectives the facts of your case. Answering this grill does not indicate an attorney-client relationship. **
You can always acquire an attorney if you want. I used to work for a personal injury attorney. They will charge you about 33% of your settlement. If it be me I would handle it myself. The most celebrated thing is to not settle but. They will try to get you to settle asap to free themselves money. I would wait until you are completely done near medical treatment and have be back to work comfortably, near no pain for at lowest a week or two. That does mean putting rotten getting money from them, but any good attorney would singular do it this way as okay.

I would call the claims rep and speak about them that you are not interested in settling until you own returned to work and are sure you are not going to have any more problems. Tell him/her that you will also want them to reimburse you for missed wages and ask if they have a form they would resembling you have your employer swarm out or if you should just enjoy them type something up on their letterhead. They will take you more seriously if you nouns like you know what you are chitchat about. They will reimburse you for every penny of missed wages higher than your pain and injury settlement. They probably won't give to do that, so I would let them know that you expect them to.

As far as the cramp and suffering settlement, $800 is a pathetic attempt at in your favour money. I don't know how much pain you own been surrounded by, so its hard to enunciate. If you were not competent to do normal tasks close to working, grocery shopping, caring for children or house work afterwards you should tell them that you be incapacitated for that period of time (like the 8 days of work you missed right after the accident). Also draw attention to how much pain you be in, if you have to take Rx backache medications remind them of that. A dutiful rule of thumb is to ask for at least twice what you want to resign from room to negotiate. Assuming that you were surrounded by pain for a polite week, maybe contained by bed for a day or two and taking stomach-ache medications, but competent to do light tasks after that I would start beside asking for at least $8,000. I wouldn't pilfer less than $4,000 but shoot for at most minuscule $5,000. Make sure to get missed wages over that.

Whenever you deal next to the claims rep always be polite and professional. They may be frustrating, but they will be much more difficult if you are rude to them. If they seem to be uncooperative or unwilling to negotiate, say something resembling "well, I guess I should of late get a advocate then". They will be much more receptive if you threaten to capture a lawyer. You might bring a little more money if you do own one, but remember that they will take 1/3 of everything you attain, including 1/3 of your missed wages.

****I am not a lawyer and am not attempting to bequeath legal direction, as that would be illegal, I am basically telling you what I would do surrounded by your situation.******

Do lawyers really step to bars after a covering to get drunk and congratulate respectively other?

Like in the movies and tv shows?
Answers: No...Thats approaching a cop murdering someone after he catches a top-criminal.
LMA0,
Noo.
iiTS LiiK3 ASKiiN "Diid REESE WiiTHERSPOON R3ALLY GO 2 HARVARD?"
JUSSPLAYiiN.
ANSW3R MiiN3? http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...
I don't muse it's like TV. But lawyer that work different side of cases are sometimes friends.

I worked for a plaintiff's lawyer and he grew sick and died. I go to his memorial service and numerous defense lawyers be there and few give speeches recalling their reverence for the way he pummel them in court.

Good lawyer are professionals and professionals treat each other surrounded by a civil manner and sometimes become friends even though they work for ambiguous interests.

Law is a contentious profession and a lawyer who take everything personally will run crazy.

A good attorney fights for his or her client, but realize the opposing counsel is a short time ago doing the same article for their client.
Are many of your friends not the relatives you work with year after day ?

Law - especially criminal litigation - is a in principle small profession.

Contrary to what you see in some shows resembling Law & Order, there's seldom much real animosity between DA's and defense lawyer except in unusual situations (usually when one side or the other have acted unethically)

In general, lawyer really do believe in the principle of the adversarial system, and see the divergent counsel as a necessary cut of the system.

To the other poster. friendship between DA's and defense lawyers usually have NOTHING to do with the voluminous number of plea bargains. The aim is that the overwhelming majority of defendants are not only guilty, but own no defense at all.

It's not unusual for a suspect to be caught "red-handed" coming out of a store at 2am beside the stolen property in his possession, make a clean breast to the cops that he broke in, make available them permission to go through his car, where on earth they find drugs - and then get hold of mad next to his lawyer because he can't "receive him off".

The fact is that surrounded by many cases, getting a plea negotiate of "low end of the scale" sentencing surrounded by exchange for the State not having to foot the expense of a trial really IS the best the defendant can hope for.

Richard
Become a attorney and find out.

Please Help- Laws on Cutting hrs after 2 week notice?

I live contained by Michigan. My bosses are trying to spite me since I gave a 2 week concentration. I have a set scedual & work give or take a few 35 hrs a week. They gave away adjectives my hours to other employees I found out today when I go to work.

I heard that here is some law that states they own to compensate me for these hours wether I work or not, for the next 2 weeks.

Is this true, can you abet me?
Answers: Sorry, not true. You work at will. The employment relationship between you and your employer can be terminated be either knees-up at any time with or in need notice. They can not solitary change the calendar as they see fit, they can legally fire you when you confer notice.
If i.e. a law it should not be.

If they don't involve you to work and you quit, they should take away adjectives your hours.
Once you give two weeks' sense, they cannot cut your hours in retaliation. That is against the directive.

I suggest you contact your local labor board and evaluate your options, including file a claim for an unfair labor practice.

In the unreality of an agreement to the contrary, the employer will be responsible for paying you for your regularly scheduled time.

Can the employer make FMLA run concurrent next to disability leave?

Answers: Yes. Employers don't usually have "disability leave". They may proposition a disability payment, however the donate is granted because of FMLA. See http://www.dol.gov/dol/allcfr/ESA/Title_... for the law.
The unit of the FMLA regulations that would apply is "Under what circumstances may an employer designate leave, salaried or unpaid, as FMLA leave and, as a result, count it against the employee's total" -- http://www.dol.gov/dol/allcfr/ESA/Title_...

Just got fired?

I a short time ago got fired today. Long story short, I saw this coming a few weeks formerly this happened. It seem a little staged to me and they wait til the very expire of the month to do it so i wouldnt get salaried on the next extent.
So , my questions are:
1) Shoulnt I capture paid an laying-off indemnization?
2) Shouldt they have given me a two week spot? (its supposed to be both ways, right?)
Answers: You can file for dismissal, but you may not get it... depends on the foundation for your termination... Insubordination, for example, is YOUR fault for individual terminated... Try to file and see what they vote.

No two week notice is crucial... think give or take a few it... if they gave you identify that you were going to be fired, you would afterwards become a liability to the company because you wouldn't care more or less the quality of your work anymore.

The one and only reason YOU would confer a two week notice to quit would be for adjectives references. Many employer tell their force to just check out of immediately instead of slack out for two weeks.
If you work "at will" as is the case contained by most states, then any party can call a halt the employer/employee relationship at any time with or in need notice.

Depending on why you be fired you may or may not qualify for unemployment. You should unquestionably file for it.

The timing of them firing you is unrelated.
1. Depends on why you were terminated.
2. Nope. It doesn't work that agency. Most jobs are "at will" and you can be tolerate go at any time for any principle.

I'm sorry to hear about what happen. Good luck.
Fired without raison d`¨ētre; start with the Unemployment organization or the state website. File TODAY; usually a 2 week waiting period since you see any cash.

Fire at will; no employer give you a 2 week notice. Makes no sense.
If you are living surrounded by the U.S., the answers are:

1. They must pay you for every hour you own worked. They don't have to money you for future hours you would hold worked.

2. They are not required to give you a "two week notice" or any observe at all. They can simply agree to you go.

3. When you are fired, you usually cannot collect dismissal benefits. They are for people who be laid off or terminated for reason beyond their control.

Bhutto assassinated by Western Intelligence Agency?

It appears odd that the assassination lead to immediate claim by political affairs that it was done by party associated with Bin Ladin. It is as if the nonspecific populace was to be agitated by government/media apparatus to the extent of turning surrounded by Bin Ladin as form of retribution?
Answers: Blaiming everything on Al Qaida nowdays has become smooth way out for the Governements.
In time in attendance will be an abundance of theories put forward as to why, wherefore,and who,

This posted one seem a very strange inference, as I understand it , would it not hold been contained by the interest of the west for her to gain office,??
Larry Craig's yawning stance partner did it. Well, that is as virtuous as your theory.

What do you think of outsourcing pregnancies?

Read this article for more information.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2007...
Answers: It sounds approaching a win-win to me. Families that could not otherwise have children can lift up a family, and the surrogate generate some very apt money to help her loved ones. It doesn't sound close to anyone is being forced to do this, so more power to them.
Wow, thank you for bringing this article to my attention, greatly interesting. The quote "wombs for rent" really got my attention. As a pregnant woman myself I cannot assume the emotional toll of giving up a child that's be growing inside of me for 9 months, however these women have a extraordinarily different motivator driving them---money, and lots of it by their standards. It's a sad route to survive simply b/c there will never be a time when these women won't quality a bond with a child they'll ultimately never know.

Another constituent of the article that caught my attention was the vein stating "You can picture the wealthy couples of the West decide that pregnancy is just not worth the trouble anymore and the unharmed industry will be farmed out," said Lantos. Let's obverse it, being pregnant is no step in the park. Mood swings, vomiting, loneliness, fearfulness, constant heartburn, backaches, tender feet, more vomiting.you get hold of the point. This statement just points out the sense of "the haves vs. the enjoy nots" in this situation. By not anyone able to reap the benefits and joy of child rearing, these Indian women are being exploited through the most consecrated part of ANY women's human being...conception and birth. All the pains with none of the benefits.

So surrounded by summary, to answer your question, I do not presume any woman in her right mind would chose to do this unless she feel there be no other way. It's selling a element of yourself...which can come at a very high-ranking cost.

LATER EDIT: to everyone who thinks this is such a miracle, how can you not see that no woman would be so "festive and willing" to do such a thing unless she be DIRT poor. Think about it. Would you do it if you be a middle class citizen just to do someone a "favor"? Or could you singular see yourself doing such a thing if you be scraping pennies and homeless? It's intensely easy to sit on a rich pedastal and influence "bless them" but it is not so much a choice on their part but a necessity.
very well said colleen t

Is this child abuse?

Did any of you see the program "Jesus Camp" on A&E finishing night? Very scarey; frightening. It reminded me of Hitler's Youth Camps surrounded by Nazi Germany during the 1930' & 40's.of course it be apparent these Jesus camp are a product of the Cristian/Republican political machine that have been going on since the Reagan/Falwell political nuptials in 1980.Did any of you deem is blantant child abuse by their impressively own parents? What can be done about it to free these poor children?
Answers: Thought control. Manipulation. These are the words that occur to me when I muse about this. The use of force, against a child, can well be considered abuse even if the swearing is not physical.

If they would remember the story of the Prodigal Son, from their own book, they would recognize that he be the one who had the greater favor from both his father and his God, because he made the choice to return on his own, have learned from the experiences of living. The son that conformed simply to shift along with what be expected of him by others inherited nought.
I agree...unfortunately most will not agree beside us. It is not child abuse, but I dream up it should be.

I was most disheartened by the one boy who said at one point that he only couldn't "feel it or believe it". He seem so upset and left out and conflicted. Instead of one able to find religious conviction and religion on his own terms it be being shoved down his throat and he be being made to be aware of a sinner and something was wrong because he could not perceive or find what the others were passion. I believe, at least within this childs case, that forcing him to the "narrow road of God" will be driving him away from it forever. I cried for him while watching it. I don't think Jesus would ever condone making a child have a feeling how this child was made to consistency.

I think that if you edify a child one religion you should teach adjectives. Or none...let them find expectation on their own when they are old adequate that the choice is of some significance.

It reminds me of my major problem beside Catholisism and many other kind of Christianity (and I find many devout things in these otherwise, please product no mistake) to believe for the fear of not believing is not right and I don't guess Jesus would counter me on this point. To go through the motions of Catholisism short actual faith is pointless. To believe contained by the doctrines of any religion without the actual moral compass describing you they are correct is moot. A religion should be chosen because it reflects your own personal beliefs and morals, you should not chose your religion and after find your moral fibre contained by its doctrine. You should not chose a religion based on your panic of not choosing.
In The God Delusion and other writings,1 Richard Dawkins claims that teaching children give or take a few religion (specifically, the doctrine of hell) is a form of child abuse that scar children for life. Accordingly, Dawkins states, "Priestly groping of child bodies is disgusting. But it may be smaller quantity harmful within the long run than priestly subversion of child minds."

Conspicuously absent within his writings are any published studies documenting that teaching children religious principles might adversely affect them. Since Dawkins claims to other rely upon science as the basis for his beliefs, why didn't he cite any science surrounded by support of his claims?

In one of the largest studies of its kind, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill examined the role of religion surrounded by the lives of nearly 2500 adolescents.9 The adolescents indicated the level of their indoctrination (i.e., frequency of church attendance) and exigency of religion, along with various activities that they enjoy or have not participate in. Listed below are graphs of behaviors that would mostly be considered to be unfavorable.
It was the saddest and sickest item I have ever see.

I cannot imagine a parent permit their children to such nonsense.

Just go to show you how religion and religious beliefs are the most destructive forces in a child's time.

More Questions and Answers:
[1265] - [2110] - [1780] - [740] - [1097] - [2567] - [2150] - [952] - [590] - [495] - [1185] - [699] - [657] - [1878] - [2187] - [690] - [2302] - [1109] - [1755] - [1877]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: