Law Questions and Answers
How much does it cost to get emanicipated surrounded by louisiana? and do i need my father signature?
iam 16 about too be 17 subsequent month iam haveing a hard time beside my family...my sister requests too save some money too endow with to me too get emancipated but we dont know how much can anyone give support to with info?/?Answers: Hopefully these links will answer your question.
http://usmarriagelaws.com/search/united_...
http://www.jlc.org/index.php/factsheets/...
LOUISIANA CIVIL CODE
BOOK I. OF PERSONS
TITLE VIII. OF MINORS, OF THEIR TUTORSHIP AND EMANCIPATION
CHAPTER 2. OF EMANCIPATION
SECTION 4. OF EMANCIPATION RELIEVING THE MINOR FROM THE TIME PRESCRIBED BY LAW FOR ATTAINING THE AGE OF MAJORITY
Art. 385. Emancipation of minor sixteen years or older.
A minor sixteen years of age or elder may be judicially emancipated and relieved of the disabilities which attach to minority as provided in Article 3991 through 3994 of the Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure.
LOUISIANA CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
BOOK VII. SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS
TITLE V. JUDICIAL EMANCIPATION
Art. 3991. Petition; court where on earth proceeding brought.
The petition of a minor for judicial emancipation shall be file in the district court within the parish of his domicile, and shall set forth the reasons why he desires to be emancipated and the expediency of his property, if any.
Art. 3992. Consent of parent or tutor.
The petition of the minor shall be accompanied by a written consent to the deliverance and a specific declaration that the minor is fully effective of managing his own affairs, by the following:
(1) The father and mother if both are alive, or the survivor if one is dead. If any parent is absent or not sufficiently expert to act, the consent of the other parent alone is prerequisite. If the parents are judicially separated or divorced, and the custody of the minor has be awarded by judgment to one of the parents, the consent of that parent alone is critical. A surviving parent is not required to qualify as natural tutor contained by order to furnish such consent, nor is the appointment of a special tutor necessary.
If the petition is file on the ground of ill treatment, refusal to support, or corrupt examples, parental consent is unnecessary, but the parents or the surviving parent shall be cited to show impose why the minor should not be emancipated.
(2) The tutor of the minor if one has be appointed. If a tutor of his property and a tutor of his person enjoy been appointed for the minor, the consent of both is compulsory. If no tutor has be appointed, or if the tutor has died, resigned, or be removed, and there is no surviving parent who is competent to act, a special tutor shall be appointed. If the tutor or special tutor refuse to give his consent, he may be cited to show do why the minor should not be emancipated.
Art. 3993. Hearing; judgment.
If the trendsetter is satisfied that within is good motivation for emancipation and that the minor is talented of managing his own affairs, he shall render a judgment of freedom, which shall declare that the minor is fully emancipated and relieved of adjectives the disabilities which attach to minority, with full power to accomplish all act as fully as if he had reach the age of majority.
How can I get a deadbeat dad contained by Bermuda to pay child support owed by a Minnesota pronouncement?
There's no reciprocity between Bermuda and MN. Deadbeat dad owes over $20,000 and hasn't made a payment within one year. He's simply quit paying. I've contacted everyone from state child support officers to our organization officials. No one know what to do, therefore it must not be contained by "their department". What good is it to proclaim a legal sentence, if there are no teeth to uphold it?Answers: Same approach you get blood from a turnip... you can't.
Harsh, but true.
You will involve to hire a lawyer specializing within international law.
But this may cost more than you would ever regain your strength.
My wife can't even get the money from her ex husband who lives surrounded by the US. He owes over $70k and he's only within another state. The guy is simply a dead smash. He gets a undertaking, his wages get attached, we acquire a check for a whopping $70 from the state of California and then he quits he work. A few months later like thing happen all over again. The guy should be within jail.
Who ever told the human being you can't collect money over state lines is wrong. We live in California and the insensible beat dad lives on the other side of the United States and somehow we achieve a measly check every few months. I'd actually fairly the guy be in detention centre then to bring a couple hundred dollars a year that basically have to be taken from him.
There's nothing you can do. I live surrounded by Ohio, my ex husband moved to Indiana and hasn't paid a dime contained by support. He is 5 years behind. The state say they can't collect 'over state lines'. I contacted an atty, and they told me the same entity. The orders can't be enforced if the father doesn't reside within the same state anymore.
It's freaking ridiculous, but true.
progress to burmuda hire a heavy dude shift round and knock him ova if that dont work then convey him the kid
You guys need to contact physical lawyers. Not those one that finished second in statute school. Go to handleonthelaw.com these are material lawyers that hold offices on Wilshire blvd not skid row.
Is he a U.S. citizen? Does he travel using a U.S. passport? New passport regulations that see a passport to be denied to a person who is delinquent within the payment of their child support obligation have stuck with several deadbeat parents.
www.childsupport.dhs.state.mn.us/Actio...
If he is a U.S. citizen and is using a passport to travel outside the U.S., you should talk to who ever administer child support law surrounded by your jurisdiction and ask them if his passport can be revoked (this might get him rear in the U.S. where on earth you would have more luck dealing beside him).
Good luck.
Is the doctrine of consideration necessary,if so why?and save what are the alternatives?
Answers: The doctrine of consideration requires some bargains exchanged on both sides for a contract to be enforceable, though in that are exceptions. I think the doctrine is vital to prevent the court from having to attempt to enforce abundantly of empty promises that don't have need of enforcing for trial or economic reason. Alternatives might be all contracts enjoy to be in writing to be enforceable, or allowing reliance as a substitute for consideration.
Good luck,
Dana (attorney)
I agree near both first two answers. Without consideration the courts would be flooded with meaningless he said she said hooey.
Is the fact that Hillary be an attorney and actually involved within business dealings the source she is such an?
easy target for investigation? No former first ladies own this kind of a surroundings. No charges were ever file against her because of the lack of evidence. Bill rose from poverty to becoming the President of the United States. Does their treatment afford people some incentive to carry out in this life span or will there other be those delight within beating motivated culture down? Is this the thanks they take for their service?Answers: Hillary and Bill Clinton were the target of investigations promoted by back stabbing republicans,lately because they were surrounded by the White House.
After years and millions of dollars spent to "investigate" them there be no indictments,but the objective be to force them to defend themselves and spend greatly of money on lawyers.
Politics is a dirty business and it take a person beside a very gooey skin to survive.One common trait of these folks is ambition,they want the power and notoriety that go with the bureau and once they are elected the try to promote theyr views and planning.Very few people do it for the money,they could engender Lot's more in the private sector,the material pay-off is theyr term contained by office and theyr name in history books.
The certainty that Rose Associates, the law firm Hillary worked for, is not support her bid for president, should tell you that Hillary's business contact and ethics somehow slipped underneath the radar.
http://www.nohillaryclinton.com/2007/07/...
Actually they prove that crime does pay. They are the two most successful criminals this country have ever produced.
Attorney talk for youin court?
contained by court and both sides have attorney mine is salaried for hers is court appointed ..can i remain silent and does my attorney do all the chitchat for me ? because i get disconcerted when i speak . and im pretty sure he does the talking the in one piece time i just sit and listen right? i get court wed. and i need to know because im so stressed because i despise talking infront of courts . and usually how long does a pretrial last? and what happen in pre trail? thank you so much. serious answers too please. and if it help its juvenile courtAnswers: You posted this question twice, but the answer is still duplicate. An attorney cannot give your nouns in court, you enjoy to give nouns. Witnesses testify, and attorneys argue about what the nouns means.
Good luck,
Dana (attorney)
5th Amendment states you don't own to say anything if you don't want to.
If you were an attorney what species would you be, prosecutor or defender?
Answers: Prosecutor. I would love to see some of these slimeball criminals spend as much time as possible trailing bars.
Prosecutor.. they "win" 95% of their cases through plea deal, and rarely ever hold to even go to trial.
Defense attorneys are the ones "losing" that 95%... that would freshly kill me to be on the short wrapping up of the stick over and over and over.!!
Defender, but only if I be sure of their innocence.
Quit my job but boss told customer he 'let me go'.?
I give a letter of resignation and a thought, but heard through the grapevine that he'd told a customer that he'd 'let me go', insinuating I'd be fired. Now I find myself defending off small town sneak and am embarrassed and nutty. I called my infirm boss' boss and left a message recitation her what happened but enjoy not heard anything. Do I own any recourse? (this is a big corporate chain) Should I even bother?Answers: No, seriously, do not bother. Let it go. If it ever comes up report people what happen as simply as possible. Say "I heard that earlier. What happened is that I sent a communiqu¨¦ of resignation and gave two weeks thought. I am not sure about his perspective on it, but (editorial comment: this is the critical sector to make things dance well for you) I really like working there, they treated me capably, but I just thought it be time for me to move on."
When you say aloud it like that you regain the lofty road and are letting people know two things. First, that you are a amuture human being who is a good hand and does things right. Second, you are correcting any impressions that people carry that you were not doing a honest job. Anyone who is grow enough to not permit it get to them and to praise their former employer surrounded by spite of these nasty rumors is someone you point highly of.
Unless you can prove it, don't bother.
If you can, you might be capable of make a bag for defamation...but you enjoy no damages, so don't bother.
Only if it affects future employment. I deem this can fall underneath the category as libel because it is false & can potentially damage your reputation & your work prospects.
If it really bothers you do something about it, if let it stir because there are stupid &^^holes out at hand that are going to lie adjectives the time to make themselves quality better about themselves.
Sorry that you are going through this. Eventually something else will draw everyone's attention & they will forget adjectives about your smaller quantity than accurate situation. Gossip is hurtful & a worthless thing to be doing. Sadly, inhabitants do it to be entertained. Small minds articulate about others. Just deliberate though, you must be pretty fascinating for them to be discussing you!
it's EGO.
post resignation on internet if it make you feel better.
They gonna enunciate they let you move about.
You gonna say you resigned.
HEY!!
if they permit you go .you can wallet for unemployment.
see what former boss say about THAT.
You can apply online.
see what object they give for "letting you go".
Should you bother? No as you hold no damages.
Father who is in prison for self a sex offender what rights does he enjoy with his 3 year matured daughter?
Answers: You will need a legal representative if you plan on legal act.
Some judges and state statutes lone consider how he/she treats the child. They may not consider the sex crime to be enough to warrant removal of rights to the child. Alot will depend on the law where you live and where on earth he lives. Most times in a situation close to this, he might just obtain a supervised visitation requirement.
Unfortunately, he will still have "human rights" although the reality that he should be considered as human sounds questionable.
This will be the case even if the daughter is his casualty. He will have the "right" to try and see her until she is sixteen and she can rob the decision not to see him anymore.
He would however probably one and only be able to hold supervised visits, whether she's his object or not. Social services should hopefully protect the interests of the daughter
Inquiring about a copy write for a picture taken next to a personal camera. How do I obtain? What is involved?
Answers: It's "copyright". If you transport it, it's automatically your property. If it's someone else's, you need to contact the photographer and ask for a copyright release.
when you own the picture "in fixed form", (immediate for digital), arguably when you print the picture but I don`t know immediate for film) you own a copyright. You need do zilch else.
you can register the copyright for additional rights against one damages, but that is surplus to requirements.
see copyright.gov and chillingeffects.org for details.
I think the residence you are looking for is "Copyright".
This is a very specialized nouns of law. If you really call for to do so, consult an attorney.
My understanding of how to copyright anything is this.
Place "Copyright by <Your Name>" somewhere on the photograph. To further support your claim, convey a copy of the picture to the Library of Congress, though this is not required.
Nothing here should be construed as legal direction. If you really need to copyright something, contact an attorney for direction.
Would Mary and Joseph been considered illegitimate aliens?
According to US law, no more than 1,000 refugee may be admitted to the US or granted asylum contained by any given fiscal year. In other words, there is a restrict to our willingness as a nation to be a haven for family like Jesus’ who are fleeing release.Answers: According to Romans 13, Joseph and Mary should have be obeying the ruling of the land.That is what they did. Now you should not be supporting disloyalty against the law of the stop.
Breaking the law isn't liberal or conservative, its simply wrong.It's a good point you don't belong to a church or speak for one. You could get them surrounded by trouble.
Frodo, sometimes we close the border, to keep demise out.
It’s not even 2008 yet and your using your supposed religion to seize out your politics. Politics is really your first religion. You’ve shown everyone over and over that you can’t stand the U.S. so why not just retire someplace similar to Australia or a crater on the moon (hehehe, where you told someone else to run away).
Let me guess who the best answerer will be. Bet it’s the one who shares your politics.
I wonder how heaps of these families you are one-sidedly willing to totally support. The truthful answer is none. If you be responsible for the total financial support of even one family, bet you'd be whining another story. My friend say that hypocritical.
Smile, Chavez loves you!
They seem resembling good nation. They probably would have come here rightfully. Jesus himself stressed the importance of following the law of the land.
btw, they be not refugees, they be summoned so that a census could be conducted. (again, following the law)
Frodo sir.They be merely following the LAW to go where on earth they did. They were ruling biding citizens.
Happy New Year.
God bless America.
Mary was due to afford birth, she and her husband Joseph traveled from their home in Nazareth roughly speaking 150 kilometers (90 miles) south to Joseph's ancestral home, Bethlehem, in command to register in a sample ordered by Emperor Augustus, the Census of Quirinius. (Gospel of Luke)
No, because Joseph was returning to his ancestral home to register. That make Joseph, Mary and Jesus legal.
A. - There are numerous exceptions to that statute . ... re: One foot on land etc ???
B. - Then you mistakenly catch into the issue that Jesus' family be seeking asylum from a decree or obverse the death of their first-born. market research call or not.
C. - The U.S. confidently grants asylum contained by those cases and is yet another example of why the 1000 'limit' is nowhere in the vicinity accurate .
D. - Then, oh my, THEN you leave yourself wide-open by omit the fact that if Mary and Joseph come here, legally or without permission, then we would willingly PAY for Jesus' birth costs and certainly the hospital would be much safer haven than a stable/barn .
Deep cross-examine though !!
I have an opinion: read what the Bible says give or take a few Mary and Joseph. They WERE married; Joseph was middle-aged! As to the so-called imperative allowing only 1,000 refugee: How did we wind up next to 13,000,000 Illegals in our country?
If you read the Gospels (you know, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John), near is absolutely nought to indicate that any wrongdoing of any sort was done by Mary and Joseph.
are you "special"
Its pretty much be spelled out for you but I would add that near is a good rationale why we have a sou`wester of immigrents into our country.
If we didn't then we would efficiently become overpopulated. When we bring immigrents in we introduce them to programs to lend a hand them get on their foot (and numerous grants, etc). If we allowed no boater n the number coming in consequently we would quickly run out of these programs and our country wouldn't be any better a haven for them than their own.
Also in attendance were abundantly less immigrents contained by Jesus' time than now. So the logistics are scarcely the same.
When they go into Egypt, they were not with the sole purpose illegal alians, they be unmarried teen parents.
More Questions and Answers:
[1556] - [1279] - [115] - [1232] - [2366] - [761] - [935] - [632] - [654] - [315] - [135] - [432] - [1361] - [383] - [1459] - [1470] - [2483] - [2158] - [2425] - [363]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: