Law Questions and Answers
Reverse Shoplifting - Shop Dropping - legal?
Is shopdropping legally recognized? Why would it be illegal? Does it depend on one's jurisdiction?In defence you don't know what it is - it's when people put products or statements into store, instead of taking them out.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_jam... - the final example given
Answers: It could be argued that it is a form of littering, and if the person "shop dropping" have been asked to start out, it could also be tresspassing.
I would say it IS unlawful..
Product tampering and the Tylenol alarm of the 1980's comes immediately to mind...
I'm sure this is covered somewhere contained by the USA PATRIOT Act (but who has have time to read it!)
“The storekeepers make money twice, we stimulate the cutback — the consumer gets a better product — and our message get heard.”
It's this second part -- getting a message hear -- where the crime occur.
It is not illegal and you can not litter on private property (like traffic law in parking lots the state have no jurisdiction outside it's own land for that nouns of the law). The store could kick you out but as long as you make tracks when they tell you to you're fine. Wait a few weeks for them to cool sour and forget about it and come vertebrae.
What does mean by popular movements contained by India after 1970?
some Peasant Movements, Women's movements etc are good example.Answers: some cultivator s movements:
Marwar farmers’ movement
Gharsana farmers' movement
social movements:
Chipko movement
Save Silent Valley
Narmada Bachao Andolen
Koel Karo
Chattisgarh Mukti Morcha
These movements largely distanced themselves from political parties or tried to cut across the ideology of the political parties.
Religious movements:
Bhakti movement
Arya Samaj
Tilak Mission
Bhagwan Swaminarayan
Brahmo Samaj
Parisada Hindu Dharma
Prarthana Samaj
Ramakrishna Mission
Sadharan Brahmo Samaj
Sree Narayana Dharma Paripalana
Swadhyay Movement
Swaminarayan Sampraday
Sathya Sai Organisation
Can a family beneficiary legally force you to stir to the hospital against your will?
My family attempted to own me admitted to the local hospital claiming that I be "suicidal" and insane. They called the police and attempted to enjoy me taken to the hospital against my will, was this course of doings legal for my ancestral to attempt?(I was released after merely a few hours, they determined that I was completely fine in no time at all)
Answers: You didn’t state your age so if you are underneath 18 then yes they can, if you are over 18 they hold to call the police claim you’re a peril to yourself or others, the police will then appropriate you to a hospital for observation, which nouns like what they did. The doctors will own so many hours (48 to 96 depending on where on earth you live) to observe you and determine if you are a trouble to yourself or others, if you’re not then they enjoy to release you.
Personally if it were me, I’d draw from a no contact order from a believe to be. Then I wouldn't give them a second thought, no contact, no postcards, nil. Then if they did contract me, I’d have them arrested. But next again I don’t like nation messing around with my vivacity.
You have the right to reject medical treatment. However, if you are not of sound mind(able to engender a rational judgement) afterwards, yes, they can.
Appreciate that you have someone care.
Yep there are frequent laws that allow this, bakers statute for example.
I highly doubt your family unit is out to get you. Instead I would suggest you stop and try to reflect "why are they desperate to seek sustain for you?"
You may not be suicidal, or insane. ..but are you doing other things that may be scaring them?
I've thought possibly times to try to get my brother admit, he's deep into cocaine, and have OD a few times, luckily hes made it.
WAS THIS A LAST EFFORT ATTEMPT FOR YOUR FAMILY????
If so try to put yourself in their shoes and be compastionate and realize why they would do this. It's tough to watch someone you love hurt themselves and slowly wipe out themselevs and have no control.
The process vary from State to State, but, in every State, near is some formal process whereby a family applicant can be "sectioned" into a psychiatric facility for evaluation against their will.
Even if the facility finds that you're not a "danger to yourself or others", that doesn't scrounging that your family be wrong in fear for you.
Richard
Does the Government have the power to pinch away M-rated Games?
See this:http://www.actiontrip.com/link.phtml?http://gamepolitics.com/2007/12/21/hilla...
This is total BS
It's the parents' option
My parents know what I'm playing, and my 9-yr elderly brother (I'm 14)
And what's with the BS give or take a few causing brutality and sexual experimentation in kids?
That is NOT M-rated games, and I hold NEVER seen an AO
Also, I'm one of the most heavenly bastards out there.
I tolerate my friends mess with me adjectives the time, and i don't respond to anything
If anything it's the TV nowadays, and the Internetz
I have it in mind, it's not like Halo have Porn in it
The closest item to it in the activity is Cortana, but there's no sexual reference on her body
Back to my press, can they do that? I mean steal away M-Rated Games?
Answers: Can your parents legally bequeath you cigarettes or alcohol or pornography to use? Probably not.
I hope you enjoy Care Bears video games, produce that's all you're gonna capture to play until you're 18.
Just like drinking alcohol, son. The regulation can place an age limit on the LEGAL age an individual can possess an "M" rate game.
And looking at your "rant", I judge that it is rather celebrated. There have be numerous studies, and VIOLENCE does beget violence. And if one see it enough, they become desensitized (they aren't shocked or afraid) to it, not to mention more prone to using it.
So what is the contract? So the game maker make 2 version of the game. I hold played games before, and the amount of blood and violent behaviour should not be the object - hammering the game is. So if they remove some of it, who should comfort? You yourself state it isn't a big deal. So why be so upset if they remove the bombing out of the games?
The whole article is like seeing something rate R as opposed to PG-13. It is the essence of the "forbidden fruit". The allure is the just the thing of having something you aren't supposed to enjoy, and seeing something you aren't supposed to see. And imposing something close to this is going to cause activity creators and makers to come up near games that are actually of substance, and not simply selling sex and violence. And really - Grand Theft Auto? What redeeming intrinsic worth does this line hold (other than getting to beat up women, decimate cops, and commit crimes)? There is no "object" to this game - the terror campaign and sex sells this item. You want to blame someone for this law mortal proposed? Blame the makers of games resembling Grand Theft Auto. If they created a game that have a true objective save for raping a woman and then hammering her to death for points, perchance people would own left them alone. And your parents are a constituent of this problem. If you have this spectator sport in your collection, they should really be ashamed of themselves.
So. . . M-rated games are not really something specifically needed. They could just as well make a hobby in two different ratings (i.e. the music industry releasing edited and unedited version of the same cd) and cover a greater audience. They could also hold a short player that shows parents what the games are and their objectives are of the games before the parents choose to buy them for their kids. Right immediately, the ratings mean nil more than a thinly veiled attempt of the team game industry to show others that they are "policing" themselves. In reality, they are doing NOTHING but putting a epistle on a package to deal in it.
Yes - Halo is a great game. And it would be freshly as great with smaller amount blood and guts, thus getting it a lesser rating. Don't put in the picture me that the blood and violence and sex plan nothing - I be your age once, and I thought like you did. Now I am a parent, and I see the other side. Even adults don't necessitate that sort of violence contained by their games. But kids DEFINITELY don't. And you will never make a legal argument as to why they should have it.
Child support is taken out of pay check but child is living beside me?
My daughter decided to come live next to me and my wife. She has lived next to us for 5 months and we are planning to obtain custody after she is considered a resident of FL (min. 6 months). My ex-wife have only sent me 2 out of the 5 payments that are taken from my military paycheck. The military will not discontinue taking the money from me until the custody paperwork is changed. Is in that anything we can do about the money that she hasn't rewarded us over the 6 months? If she is a stay at home mother and has min income, will the court require her to rate child support?Answers: My thoughts would be to get it within writing in the custody agreement that the mother pays fund what she has received during the time the daughter have been living next to you. In the document give the amount owed and a time string in which it is to be remunerated back.
As far as the mother paying child support I would suggest since she have minimal income and a stay at home mom to let it jump and just enjoy her pay fund the income from your pay checks.
As it stands immediately, she has custody of your daughter. As long as she have legal custody, the child support will verbs to be deducted from your check.
She still wants to maintain a home for your child until you land custody.
Been down this path myself. You will rate until a court issues another order. Period. End of that cut of the story.
I say jump to JAG for some help contained by getting this matter since a civilian Judge ASAP. Your ex will have to agree beside the change and sign. After that it is a issue of taking the signed docs to the court and getting them stamped. I did not have to be present. She did not hold to be present. Signed docs and my lawyer and Bida Bing it's done. She can drag her foot, change her mind etc etc. She will predictable get a Judge pissed if they enjoy to bring your child in because of any problems. Depending on the state you may adjectives have to be interviewed by a social worker too.
How old do u call for to be to buy zig zags?
Answers: You need to be ancient (and mature) enough to know better.
Depends on where on earth you live.
"SALE OF CIGARETTES, CIGARS, CHEWING TOBACCO, POWDERED TOBACCO, OR OTHER TOBACCO PRODUCTS, HERBAL CIGARETTES, ROLLING PAPERS OR PIPES, TO PERSONS UNDER EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE IS PROHIBITED BY LAW." -- NY State law
Any tobacco product you hold to be 18, even if you have categorically no intention of using them with tobacco ;-)
Who works at Taco Bell? Anyone know about the Legal System?
I work at TacoBell within Illinois and I do not receive minimum wage. Legally they do not have to repay me minimum wage because I am a minor (17). i confronted my manager surrounded by July when I didn't receive the raise to minimum wage (It go up to $7.50). She said she would call corporate payroll to have a word to them about it. the bureaucrat said that since I am a minor, I will not receive minimum wage until i am of age.She also told me that she would put me and another minor coworker in the computer for a angle of 7.50 so that we would get the minimum wage. When I get my next check, I see that I still had My $7.05 wage and not $7.50.I told her almost it and she said that they have to remuneration me because she raised me to $7.50. Well, afterwards she told me to make copy of the check stubs since the inauguration of July.I made her the copies and gave it to her. I hold been asking her something like it since, and she comes up with "well", and stuff close to that.Since she told me she gave me the lift to min. cant i get retropay 4 it?Answers: According to the minimum settle laws contained by Illinois, a minor gets .50 smaller quantity than an adult as minimum wage (if an developed is at $7.50, a minor is at $7.00). So technically, Taco Bell is paying you above minimum wage. You can see all of this at www.state.il.us/agency/IDOL. Matter of certainty, most of your labor related questions will be answered at this site, as resourcefully as they will tell you how to database complaints against your employer.
As for the pay entry, she can put you in for the incline, but if the company doesn't approve it, then you are out of luck. It is possible that she put you contained by for it, and due to the amount of the raise, it be refused by corporate. Your proprietor only have so much control over how much you make.
If you are have issue with your check, I would contact your payroll department for your company. There should be an 800 number to inquire in the order of your check. If you aren't getting the answers that satisfy you from your chief, then run higher up the stepladder. If you can't contact payroll, then see going on for contacting HR (Human Resources) - they are there to assist workforce with question and how to get answers. Otherwise, you may newly have to suck it up until you are 18. Sorry.
Under your state imperative people beneath the age of 18 may be paid up to $0.50 smaller amount then the minimum wage or $7.00 per hour.
http://www.eaconnect.com/content.aspx?ci...
If I'm killed by someone do I enjoy the right to defend myself or is it bent for a dead being to do that?
Answers: go ask Yoda.
The latter the hour, the weirder the question. . .
It is not unauthorized for a dead personage to defend themselves, but the option are limited to bloating and smelling fruitless. . .
No, one must have lost the skin.
Actually one may be facing a new court satchel in front of GOD.
By after, one will be too busy to defend oneself than suing another.
Probably not crooked, but very, impressively difficult.
:-)
This is a dumb question. But anyway, , once you are comatose you have no Due Process rights, in actual fact no rights unless someone still alive exercises them for you by proxy such as in the armour of Wills and Trusts.
How old are you? Ask material questions have some sum and substance in them.
As a minor in the state of California, what rights do I hold?
Answers: Like someone else said; you, personally hold no rights. They belong to your parents. Your right to free speech, for example, is really the permission that your parents afford you to exercise THEIR right to free speech, not yours. You have no right to free speech on your own. Any mature could tell you to shut the hell up, except that you enjoy the permission of your parents to speak. They, however, can narrate you to shut the hell up.
Your parents give up their rights, as you are concerned, when they furnish you over to the custody of another adult, close to a school, babysitter, or other guardian. Your rights next come from that custodial adult, who can afterwards tell you to shut the hell up.
You are the being holding the end of a hose. You can spray marine any way that you want, except that your parents control the spigot. Without them, you hold no water at adjectives.
The same rights as an adult, as controlled by the legislature, or as limited by your parents rights to exercise parental authority over you.
The subject fill numerous textbooks, and can't be other answered in a few lines.
Richard
As be said, that's hard to answer within a post. If you have any specific question as to your rights please clarify.
To sum it up best, you are pretty much property according to the law. Crimes can be committed against you by your parents (charged brought by the state, not by you) much resembling they can be commit against a pet. Other than that all of 'your' rights are through your parents and are really their rights.
There is lone one loop-hole and that is for your situation to be so unpromising that a judge decide that your parents are bound to commit crimes against you and also that you are capable of charitable for yourself. In other words, the least amount of work for the official system later. Your parents do not enjoy the opportunity to commit crimes (abuse, neglect, etc) that would expiration up in the officially recognized system, and you do not end up as a ward of the state.
I'm not proverb that it's right fair or right, but that's the method it is.
If you're referring to 'your' rights through your parents in regard to what everyone else is not allowed to do to you that's categorically going to need to be explained on a travel case by case starting place.
Here's the short course:
You, as a minor, have, necessarily, the same rights as an fully fledged, except as limited by state and federal legislation plus you hold certain protections below law which an grown does not.
You are also subject to proper (legal) parental or guardian care and custody. If a student, you are subject to the rules within place regarding conduct at the college.
If a minor commits certain crimes, s/he may own to forfeit certain protections granted minors beneath law and stand trial for prosecution as an mature.
Free Advice: Do yourself a favor by getting the very best tuition possible; you'll never regret it and it will be the best decision you can build as a minor or young fully developed.
What are the Statues of Limitations for Defamation, Slander, Libel, and Negligence in Michigan?
Best answer receive the points.Answers: The types of infractions you've mentioned are all torts. Generally, torts hold a statutory limited length of 4 years, while contract breaches have a limitations time of year of around 10 to 15 years. To be sure, check Michigan law on www.findlaw.org.
More Questions and Answers:
[368] - [1774] - [2499] - [1580] - [2414] - [1591] - [2159] - [1306] - [72] - [790] - [461] - [215] - [1029] - [1216] - [406] - [249] - [990] - [2100] - [768] - [1595]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: