Law Questions and Answers

Family Law Question?

Short story: My husband adopted his wife (now ex) 2 children and they have a child. When they divorced he had visitation etc. She remarried and they moved out of state. She lied on adjectives documents about her brand new address and denied my husband visitation. Once she moved he had no clue where on earth they was and could not see his kids. No money to look for her or conflict he did the best he could to find them. Seven years later the kids and their mother is vertebrae in the state of Florida, her presently ex husband # 3 adopted the kids beside out his consent and no doubt they lied to own that done. We know where they are, where on earth they live etc. My question is, where on earth do I look online to find out the stautes, codes or whatever its call for this kind of ruling? Like what do I l ook under? I hold googled a few things but I have no clue what I am doing. We are newly wanting to know the laws back he contacts the oldest girl (17) and/or take official actions. Sorry this turned out to be long.

Answers: Short answer: your husband could still owe thousands of dollars surrounded by child support if he pursues it. He is still the legal adoptive dad, and is underneath a child support order regardless.

So is the second adoptive dad. What the woman have done is commit a fraud on the Court (and maybe on the second adoptive dad). She is probably collecting child support underneath false pretenses, and could be charged criminally, go to put in prison & lose the children--probably to your husband.

You don't say (and you may not know) how much your husband know about the first adoption. Did he secrete facts from the Court? If so, then he could be guilty of a fraud on the Court also.

Nothing prevents him from contacting his adoptive children. He have a Court order allowing him visitation.

If she hide things from your husband at the time of the first adoption, and from the second husband at the time of the second adoption, then the two exes should carry together and see an attorney, or even a prosecutor. Both may be relieved from liability to support the kids.

** Note: This is a general discussion of the subject concern of your question and not official advice. Local law or your particular situation may alter the general rules. For a specific answer to your ask you should consult legal counsel beside whom you can discuss all the facts of your shield. **

Your husband can get the second adoption set aside. He might after become liable for back child support. You don't speak whether you & he have children -- There may be complications involving inheritance or disability payments within the event of his death or disability. He should speak to a relations law attorney until that time he decides what he desires to do.

** Note: This is a general discussion of the subject situation of your question and not decriminalized advice. Local law or your particular situation may correction the general rules. For a specific answer to your press you should consult legal counsel beside whom you can discuss all the facts of your defence. **

Small claim court?

What is a good source for Small claim court?Does the court enjoy the power to implement? Or the worth case, their (defendent) Credit history is ruined? Info on the subject of Dallas, TX.

Answers: Here you go:
http://www.dallascounty.org/department/j...

It have all the information you obligation (including forms) for Small Claims Court actions contained by Dallas, TX.

The law vary from state to state, in mine a small claim decision can result in the public sale of personal property and garnishment of wages. Non-compliance with court directives eventually may result in contempt of court, loss of driver's license and confinement. Not a suitable thing. Check local canon for your area. Most can be found on-line.

Emancipation of minors?

okay so i am 14.. i turn 15 on January 8th and i live in Pennsylvania. My mother and father are both drug addict, but my father has full custody over me ONLY so i can live next to my stepmother. I am aware that you have to be 16 to be emanicpated, but i know the process will help yourself to a long time. but do you think i should start presently? If i were to return with emanciapted i would live with my stepmother lacking my sick father who is a theif and a lazy bum and who have NEVER done a thing for me execpt obtain custody over me so that he would have a place to live and find fat and monitor tv and come hid from his stupid drug friend who he other ows money to. I have be living with my step mother since i be 3 so she would adopt me, and we would kick my father out so he can rot within hell for all i attention to detail.we have talk about it since i be 13. she is the my parent just not lleagally. shes the solely one who provides for me--my tution for my expensive HS all my sports and Piano and food and clothing.

Answers: I would suggest that you speak to children's aid, and follow their instructions.

I quality badly give or take a few your situation, and your feelings of angst for your father.

No child should enjoy to grow up in that type of environment.

At lowest possible it seems that you own a good and clad stepmother who cares in the region of you.

Good luck to both of you.

you won't be emancipated untill you can provide your own financial security, place to live and prove stimulating stability as well.

Start within.

I work in Pawtucket RI, If the company I work for desire to closed on a regular "work day" should they pay me?

Packaging Graphics on 60 Delta Drive, Pawtucket RI arranged that they will close their doors on December 31...I don't think is official to send us (the employee) home lacking pay if they established on their own to close for that day. Neither should I appropriate time off my break hours like they suggested..Thanks

Answers: What they are doing is completely endorsed. You have no recourse.

So they closed for the New Year holiday. They are not required to recompense you. Paid holidays are not mandatory. It is up to the company to decide if they want to propose their employees the benefit of salaried holidays.

Can one argue that justice and mercy are inseparable and impossible to tell apart?

For example, if justice other requires a price then even though mercy be extended someone still have to pay the price even if it's not the one who committed the productive crime. Therefore, in loose expressions, what makes mercy any different than even-handedness if it must always group justice on justice's language. I'm talking of Justice within terms of Universal Law. For example, for every movement there is an incongruous reaction. When we give somebody a lift a step, we push against force that pushes against us. In some simplistic way, isn't this equality. Must our force always be met near opposing force?

Answers: Short answer: No, you can't construct that argument, not unless you completely distort the meaning of both language.

"Justice concerns the proper ordering of things and folks within a society. "

"Mercy is a permanent status used to describe the leniency or compassion shown by one person to another, or a request from one soul to another to be shown such leniency or compassion."

Completely different things. We can say -- for example -- that sprite must be tempered near mercy, and that's a useful argument. But it's twaddle to say that the two are matching.

I would say that they are not equal. Mercy has a role to play contained by a just system but it is not the singular factor.

Obviously, Justice and Mercy have zilch to do with proven laws which do not necessarily apply to human relationships. I also enjoy my doubts that you can have a wide-reaching agreement as to what constitutes Justice.

In my mind, Justice requires taking into consideration the alleged impropriety (which could be any civil or criminal) of the parties, the consequences of that bad behaviour, and the other circumstances of the party. In a civil armour, mercy should have little or no role because you are hurting one get-together to help the other. In a criminal bag, mercy might have a role where on earth there is in recent times something about the defendant that might not business in another casing but in this suitcase makes you come up with that the defendant deserves another chance.

No, they are not duplicate. Justice requires sternness of action. Mercy is the falling or removal of that requirement.

Would video taping a presentation of my invention provide adequate information for an attorney to defend it?

Suppose I enjoy the "invention" presentation video (which included "detail" parts drawings) and a video tape of the individuals, representating a factory owner, attending a presentation of the idea. Would those two tape be enough to panic the manufacturer away from stealing my impression? Could an attorney use these two tapes to successfully preserve my inventation if it were to be stolen.

Answers: A skilled attorney could undeniably present these items as convincing evidence in your favor. The outcome would depend upon how the competitor in truth engineered the product - unless he actually used your drawings, it is not unfair to imitate an opinion if you do the work yourself in engineering.

The burden of proof surrounded by a civil case is "by a preponderance of the evidence" or 50.1%, however, the peacemaker will hae to determine if any laws be broken. If you have no official document, and the law does not otherwise protect your notion, then you own no case.

Get an attorney to evaluate your quiz

It could be used as evidence that the employer of the individuals had know-how of the details of the invention as of the date the tape be made. Period. For whatever use that would be surrounded by a patent contest.

My landlord doesn't other give us our correspondence.?

I live in a generous sized RV park and our mail is deliver to one big main box at the side of the road (6 days a week) the messages then get put in peoples personal boxes. The problem is the manager only distributes the e-mail 2-3 days a week. Is that legal?

Answers: NOT officially recognized in the USA

Mail MUST be deliver when Postal service delivers it..
Actually...YOU must own your own PRIVATE box.
It is against the law for anyone besides the Postal seervice to touch your post.

No, it very much risky. You should contact your local postmaster. Perhaps they could install a small line of separate boxes for respectively space in the RV
Park. Holding your communication is a Federal Crime..unless you go on time off and have it held at the post organization. But, if she's just slothful you can always hike up to her to get your e-mail also.

The mailman should be delivering correspondence to your personal boxes. It isn't the landlord's responsibility to even touch your mail, tolerate alone deliver it to you. Your landlord isn't doing anything wrong, he's doing extra work that he shouldn't be doing. Contact the post bureau and find out what is going on.

What are the exceptions?

I have other wanted to friendly my own bar. Now that I am close to human being able,these stupid smoking ban are coming into effect. I just want to know what the exceptions are. I hear one person clich�� Cigar shops will have exceptions.
So what are the exceptions to this smoking ruling out in Illinios.

Answers: grant your local zoning office a phone; they can tell you the specifics surrounded by your county

This is not the place to find out. If you are going to sink a significant amount of cash into your business, the FIRST article you should do is get a definitive answer to your examine. I've been practicing regulation for over 25 years and I would not hazard a "guess" on such a criitical issue here. And I know how to find out, collectively, what law applies. And I'm here to update you that if you believe ME, you are asking for trouble. "Findlaw" and Wikepedia are not reliable sources. That's generally what you will return with as authority here.

When you apply for your liquor license, you will get adjectives the information you need to resolve how to proceed. (This information is probably on line for you to review or you can obtain the information from the Alcohol Beverage Control and/or the Secretary of State.) As a GENERAL rule, smoking is banned contained by bars that enjoy a certain percentage of food sale. Not serving food often triggers other restrictions, such as first showing times etc. Again, all of this is available to you.

I would suggest that if you reckon "stupid smoking bans" are going to deter you from opening your banister, you probably should not do it. Bars all over the country are flourishing within spite of it. And yes, there are adequate "exceptions" that will allow your patrons to smoke. It seems to me that you are more worried roughly speaking smoking than anything else. Bars are subject to very strict regulations. That's basically the way it is. A smoking sanction is just one of them. If administration regulation is a problem, trust me. You are going into the wrong business.

As of now here are no exceptions to the smoking ban surrounded by Illinois. Any public building and businesses including bars, restaurants, private clubs and casinos are subject to the restriction. But as they have all the same to figure out who is going to enforce it and wage the cost it could change. But I agree near the poster who said to check all law before slit your bar. It is one of the most regulated businesses here.

How do you go give or take a few suing a collection company that has call our home before 8, departed a message on the answer

This company has call before 8 am. Left a message and I enjoy the message stating the time. This same lady call the other night, my daughter answered, (who is taking criminal imperative in college) and told the female (who asked for my husband) that he was not home (which he be not). The lady asked if this be his wife, whom my daughter said yes (for a paper for her class). The female did not ask for any proof that I was his wife. My husband is the singular person on the narrative she is calling for, I am NOT on it. My daughter pretended to be me, the lady did NOT ask any other verify questions, lately told my daughter that my husband owed 1400. and would I be willing to set up payments and why be he behind and discussed this statement with her. Can I sue this company and how do I travel about doing it? Thank you.

Answers: No zilch can be done. Legally they can call your house between the times of 8am and 9pm. I realize that she call before 8am but it happen. Just because your husbands name is merely on the account it doesn't' situation who they get their money from. They can converse to a spouse and make return arrangements that way. My daughter be behind on her credit card and when my husband stated she wasn't home they asked if he be her spouse and he said yes and he set up payment arrangements for her. Doesn't' nouns right, but I don't think you can do anything expect wages the bill. Good luck and God Bless

Clearly you need an attorney who is familiarized with the practices of these slimeballs. Next you entail as much documenation to show that they are harassing you, taped messages if you still enjoy them, copies of any letters they sent you.

I am within the process of suing a collection agency now, for a credit card that isn't mine and I spent an hour or so on the phone faxing my documentatoin and discussing option.

If you want, you can e-mail me and I can give you more information something like contacting an attorney to help you near your situation.

the first yhing to do is go to
find canon.com
find the administrative codes
in the canon library and look at the
ethics of bank
then check the consumers rights. be informed earlier you call an attorny

Is Corporal Punishment still legal surrounded by private schools contained by the UK?

Answers: Not sure, but it should be legal within ALL schools.

Corporal Punishment is no longer legitimate in the UK. The academy system in the UK in a minute avoids all forms of physical correction altogether, favour other methods such as "Reality Therapy" and "Assertive Discipline". Its total abolition is something that has be discussed by many countries and the United Nations human rights standards strongly discourage the use of this punishment.

As very well as Corporal Punishment in school being banned in the UK it have recently come to intervene that it is also illegal inside the domestic setting as parents are no longer permitted to use this form of punishment on their children.

The debate over corporal punishment has be long and hard over the years. I myself be often cane at school usually but not other I deserved it and sometimes when I did deserve it I was not given the wacker I suppose a swings and roundabouts situation. and yes sometimes it be abused. It was not pleasant but similar to most boys of that time I would rather that than detention or lines because it expected that I could get on beside life. As I get older the wicker was used smaller quantity often on the ground that single silly little boys got the rattan and you lost the respect of you contemporaries not only for individual daft enough to return with caught
It may be a spurious correlation but little old ladies did not normally have their houses broken into and most of us did not transmit our parents (they usually found out we had misbehaved on friendly night ) because it would enjoy entailed further punishment. As I grew elder in college so the cane be used less repeatedly and then it be "if you are going to be a silly little boy you will be treated as one"

They should bring it back it never hurt me i get whacked plenty. I soon learnt to enjoy respect for other people. never mind the sodding dogooders bring it vertebrae for them as well. It`s them that enjoy caused the problem. And the country is contained by the state it is. bully`s no problem . bully them. they will stop it.

Hi there,

corporal punishment is dishonest within the UK. If a child is contained by private school consequently the school assumes the role of parent (in loco parentis) and are allowed by the Children and young-looking persons perform to reasonably chastise a child within their care, who misbehaves. However, such chastisement must be defensible. Following the landmark result in R-v-Brown the regulation on consent to physical harm be massively curtailed. The decision stated that no-one can actively consent to any form of physical spoil being inflicted upon them. Thus it is unlawful in a minute to inflict harm against a individuals wishes upon that person, as economically as according to their wishes (sado masochism).

Moreover, as pupils within a private institution are usually minors (under 18 years of age). The law states that they are not of an age where on earth they can form the required intention to consent to physical violence of any liberal against them. Reaffirming the decision within Brown. Thus any form of physical harm brought to take on upon a minor at private school is punishable contained by English law. If they are hit later an assault charge may be proferred. If bleeding results or bruising then Section 47 Offences Against the Persons Act 1847 is applicable (ABH). Anything worse could front to grievous bodily harm charges man brought under any Section 20 (Causing GBH) or Section 18 (Inflicting GBH). Thus although the school still reserves the right to as expected chastise their pupils the reasonableness test have been significantly diluted. Moreover the Human Right Act 1988 disallows any conduct against any human being, which is inhumane, unfair or degrading further eroding the rights of school to punish pupils.

Kind regards

Michael Cavanagh
London England

More Questions and Answers:
[52] - [2126] - [1990] - [1668] - [1304] - [2042] - [929] - [1463] - [955] - [2449] - [416] - [2130] - [679] - [2251] - [2546] - [155] - [2054] - [2402] - [178] - [1440]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: