Law Questions and Answers

Has anyone ever knowingly broken the imperative?

I don't mean robbing bank or such like. For example downloading music in need paying. speeding, dropping litter. The little things in go. The things that do not appear to have any consequences.

Does it bother you when friends or ancestral do such things & how do you deal near it.

I would add that I deliberately brake the law
Answers: Yes, I own knowingly broken the directive.

I frequently drive faster than the speed limit. I download and copy music and video without paying for them. I've smoked marijuana for recreational purposes, purchased and consumed alcohol beforehand I was 21, and set sour fireworks in states where on earth it is banned. I've also smuggled a bottle of authentic Czech absinthe through U.S. Customs. I hold jaywalked and littered and trespassed.

I have done adjectives this with the full scholarship that I was breaking the ruling when doing so. No, it doesn't bother me when friends or family do such things.

I imagine you're referring to the philosophy of "victimless crime", to which libertarians object and largely oppose law that prohibit actions harm no one but the guilty party. Essentially, you should have the right to do doesn`t matter what you want as long as your behavior does not violate said rights of anyone else.
"No-one need suspicion an ID card if they have nought to hide," - the UK govt.
Personally, I don't know you; but I'd break any ruling to free you.
Moi? Not for years, and haven't we all?
anarchist

What is homicide and genecide?

i always hear those words on shows involving cops
Answers: Put simply homicide is Scott Peterson bloodbath his wife. Genocide is Hilter killing the Jews and what the inhabitants of Darfur are suffering.
Homicide is a death cause by other than unconscious causes. Usually a murder but can be from depraved indifference or criminal inattention.
Genocide is an attempt to wipe out an entire group of ethnic group based on religious or political or other classification that lumps them together. Such as the Nazi's committed genocide on the Jews.
Homicide is when one human kill another human. Genocide is the deliberate and systematic extermination of a national, tribal, political, or cultural group.

Glad to have help...
homicide is murder, or any unnatural cause of demise.
idk what genocide is... but if you find out, let me know!
Homicide is when one entity kills (murders) another character
Genocide is when an entire nationality, political, or cultural see of people are kill (like with the Nazi's and the Jewish nation during WWII or the racial murders surrounded by parts of Africa today)
Homicide is something that results in the disappearance of a human being. Homo Sapien = man.
Genocide is the attempt to smooth away an entire race.

Homicide CAN be not premeditated of deliberate. Genocide is, by definition, a careful act.

How do the kids in child porn bring there?

i guess what i want to know is do their parents subject them to it for money, do they run away and do it or anything else? i presume it is very wrong but me and my friend saw it on the word today and we were wondering if you can similar to do time in incarcerate just for similar to looking at it? we thought we knew someone who looked at it but the site said they be 18+, were they lying? i know this quiz is like really inapropriate but we a moment ago wanted to know.
Answers: in good health of course some of them are lying. and oodles of them are likely person forced to perform sex (acts) against their will next to a older grown. their parents may force them to do this, or another adult close to the domestic usually. the parents may not even know about this. this is a serious event. if you find a website i would report it to http://www.fbi.gov/innocent.htm . you'll find more information there. you can't do time for looking at...since unquestionably you did not know what it was beforehand.
I'm not sure i ponder alot of them are kidnapped though, and they unquestionably are lying about the age surrounded by fear of person caught by police and YES you can go to send to prison just for looking at it.
Report this straight
By way of the frozen road
Unfortunately, some parents do get salaried for putting their kids in those movies and other kids hold been abduct.
Its called abused and exploited children. These kids are any snatched like contained by america or sold out by their drug addicted parents or have to clutch to the streets in 3rd world countries to nurture their families.
It's adjectives underground stuff. Meaning they don't really have to own permission. You'll also mind that they guys/girls in the films, in good health the ones over 18 won't show their faces
They are subject to this giving of work by force, or by being tricked, ever situation is different beside every child. What do you mean you thought? I guess you saw the porn site yourself?? If you suspect that its unsanctioned then report it.
Some are groomed or made to reckon it is normal quantity of everyday life, some are conquered or terrified into doing it. All are harmed by it. Yes you can do time within jail for looking at it and affairs of state hackers track people down and set up false sites to trap society who look at it. It's a crime to look at it because producing it always involves harm a child. These children can grow into damaged adults. Some of the harm is unimaginable, and you can be labelled for vivacity as someone dangerous for using it. Having said that it's the conduct yourself of paying for it or supplying your own web porn that will really incriminate you. If you use a credit card to repay for porn be very vastly careful what you retribution for. -

Further Comment - good to see you didn't reimburse!! You should be OK!! If you think it's physical child porn, report it as the guy above says, one click should be OK, but your computer doesn't really delete anything it lays it on the tricky disk. It just writes and rewrites over it. If you spend long evenings looking at this stuff, even if you delete it Police forensic team can recover the history. However don't verbs, they are not after the click once to see what comes up guys, but the repeat users and buyers and producers of this stuff. Having said this I personally would never type contained by dodgy requests to a website.

What legel verdict would this be?

I'm writing a story, and I'd resembling it to be as accurate as possible. So heres the situation.

Say a hunter wonders out of a legal hunting nouns and accidentally shoots another person. Leaving the nouns was intentional, but shooting the personality was an misfortune.

The hunter is extremely wealthy and competent to throw lots of money at the trial, while the family of the human being who got shot is average/low income.

Whats the least possible amount of time the hunter can be sentenced to? What would the reason be (excluding pleading insanity)? Are in attendance any technicalities that could get him no time?

Its a more or less important fragment of the story, so I would like an truly legal occupancy (example: "defendant is sentenced to ___ years/months by reason of ___").

And yes, i know almost zilch about the court system, which is why this question might seem to be stupid to some people...
Answers: "Yak Rider" and "wmwiv" could both be correct. It depends on this critical distinction:

If the hunter *meant* to fire the weapon (at what he thought be a deer, say), but accidentally hit a person instead, the charge would be involuntary manslaughter. If found guilty, the most predictable punishment would be less than a year incarceration, plus several years of probation.

If, on the other hand the hunter tripped and fell, and the gun go off, or otherwise did not tight-fisted to fire the weapon at all, afterwards he is not guilty of any crime (except, possibly, negligent homicide, if it could be shown that the gun go off as a result of gross negligence on his part).
If it be an accident, ruled chance by the coroner, then no charges would be file.

If the area the hunter go onto was heavily used as repose, or for some other purpose by people, and the hunter should enjoy known it be heavily used by people, it's possible they could read aloud he demonstrated "depraved indifference" to the safety of others. It's resembling saying he be reckless. He could win an involuntary manslaughter charge. Still, as a first offense he's looking at probation and a fine.

His real exposure is to civil damages surrounded by a law suit.
A adjectives criminal charge for this would be involuntary manslaughter. Setencing guidelines vary from state to state but can be as little as a few years or even commuted depending on circumstances. Check near the specific state you are basing your story in.

How much can i expect to pay a advocate to help me fight a collection agency which has sued me?

any serve much appreciated..
Answers: Depends, generally lawyer run around $250 per hour and up to handle allowed issues. You need tofind the right advocate that specializes in these cases to get hold of your moneys worth. Not all lawyer handle alike cases, some are criminal, contractual, or personal injury cases.

You might want to find an Arbitrator, to settle this between you and the agency. These individuals review both sides and makes a rulling for who is within the right and usually a lot smaller amount expensive

Good Luck
My friend had a lawsuit against a motorcycle company.. what he did be got online... nearby are many lawyer that know they can win your case, if they dont win, you owe them zilch. this is the best way to turn... you get your money and they carry theirs.. he won his case, get the motorcycle, and the money.. lawyer get his chunk and he didnt have to verbs about a thing- his attorney did everything.
get online... look into around... you will find someone...
sorry to hear about that sweetie. obedient luck to you : )
Honestly, the attorney fee will probably be complex than the amount of the debt they are trying to collect.

Unless the debt is big, really big, you're far better off trying to work out a payoff arrangement with the collection agency, or if you can't pay envelope, filing liquidation.

[legal advice] there is a guy who is spreading lies something like my GF to her family and friends and it’s venomous ?

I am from middle east, came here up to that time two years and I found the love of my life approaching a 18 month ago.
We moved to our place like a year ago. Since later, her family starts to relate her whatever it thieve to break us up. It didn’t work but it hurt her lot that her family is discussion about me when they don’t know me. Before a week two of her sisters confirmed a story that be spread around for the last six months by a brother of her friends between her people and friends which destroyed her relationship with her friends and made a great disrupt to her relationship with her ancestral. My GF told them that the story is a lie and they should confirm the story by her since believe in it. The guy who said the story sticks to his lies. Only god know what else be told about her or me.

I want to know if within is any legal conduct she can do to deliver justice and engineer him lesson to the rest of them. She is living in misery because of his lies and the damage that he cause.
Answers: You can sue for "slander" in Civil Court.

See the permitted definition below:

Slander is an untruthful oral (spoken) statement about a individual that harms the person's reputation or standing in the community. Because slander is a tort (a civil wrong), the injured party can bring a lawsuit against the person who made the false statement.
Go to Wikipedia and look up slander:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libel
it is a very moral article about libel and slander, which are the crimes you are a sufferer of.

Why does one need a license to drive, but not to hold children?

I mean, that if empire want to have children, they should find a license. They should go to parenting classes and when they exceed, they can have children.
Answers: The right to enjoy children is a fundamental right under the US constitution. That medium, any government attempts to regulate it must congregate this highest constitutional standard: strict scrutiny. Basically, the regulation must be narrowly tailored to get together a compelling governmental interest where compelling usually resources that the government can't effect its purpose any other passageway.

Driving on the other hand is not protected by the US constitution. Government's regulation of drivers obtain ordinary rationality review. Basically, the regulation have to be rationally related to a legitimate state purpose. This is the lowest standard of review the supreme court uses. Just almost anything can be rational. In the baggage of drivers, safety is the purpose and it is markedly rational. Licensing drivers is prominently related to that rational purpose.

So, the short answer is: if administration came up near a compelling purpose that necessitated a precise regulation, it should pass constitutional muster. However, tons of the purposes that have be suggested in the answers won't go past the strict scrutiny test because they are (1) not compelling and/or (2) here are other less constitutionally problametic ways to effect duplicate purpose.
Your theory have some serious flaws. What happens if a couple become pregnant unexpectedly? Do you force the woman to abort or do you snatch the baby away from them at birth (against their will) and offer it to someone else?

Or you could just sterilize those associates that you have deem "unfit to breed". After all, that's what the nazis did.

Asinine? Really, so what do you suggest begin to people who can't get hold of their license? Nothing at all? Then what well-mannered is the license in the first place?

I be the one called asinine by another individual who answered, I was responding to that statement. Also, if my spelling is so horrible, afterwards what does the word frivious mean?

I deduce that you have moral intentions, but you have to realize the consequences of what you are suggesting. If here is a test that ancestors need to surpass in writ to have children what do you do if someone who does not or can not elapse for some reason become pregnant? If you allow them to keep the tot, then the point of have a license is moot. People will see that they don't really NEED the license to have a child and suppose why bother.

On the other hand if you agree on to enforce the license then you will own to take a child away (in some way, any through abortion or forced adoption) because you THINK that this person may be a desperate parent based on your license criteria. That would make you a monster.

That's why I said your hypothesis had some serious flaws. If you're going to rob other people's opinions so one-sidedly, then you shouldn't ask for them.

btw: What did I misspell? Besides your misspelling which I pointed out to you?
Very biddable question I really devise that it should be mandatory to take parenting classes when you become pregnant and if the dads around he should enjoy to as well.

Mistress K your answer have many flaws as powerfully. She's not saying abort merely to teach those to become better parents. There is nothing wrong near that. Your answer was asinine.

Just shows how f'ed up this world is and why children are running around commiting crimes, seeing as I get three thumbs down to me wanting people to be better parents you society are pathatic
What a great question.
Most would argue that driving can effect the deaths of others.
But an irresponsible, inexperience parent can incentive even far more adverse affects to society. Like giving birth and rearing an irresponsible person who would drink and drive and slaughter many on the side totter.
So parents should be certified before giving birth.
I with the sole purpose wish.

Unfortunately, the tiny detail that children come along whether or not the (less and smaller quantity sexually educated) younger generations enjoy any sort of parenting skills beforehand is a simple fact.

I do decision that such a concept was at tiniest taught regularly surrounded by schools...but the "instruct only abstinence" crowd (at lowest here in the States) have the issue of sex education throttled down to a murmur at best.
WOW!

That is by far one of the most ridiculous things I hold heard surrounded by quite some time. I don't even know where on earth to start, so I won't.

Let me guess.. do you consider yourself a Liberal?
You are correct. I think it would be a appropriate plan. Only people near some sex education, and some other adjectives training could have children. That would be pretty cool considering that most, men anyway, cogitate that "sex education" means his technique to find women to have sex next to him. Most people, I know don't even know the name of their parts, or the difference between semen and sperm.

When you do most things in vivacity, some kind of planning is involved. Sometimes it take weeks, or years. Making a baby is as simple as "Oh, I don't own a condom".

That is why I had a vasectomy when I be 21. I still use condoms unless I am dating someone whom is also fixed. I do so because I am not taking any risks. I like sex seriously, and I fear making a newborn much more than I fear any STD.
parenting class? mmmm Yes I would surmise that some sort of life/ personal development as we grow will support prepare us for the life ahead. I don`t consider there is a total parenting model and indeed we are entrusted to care for and to coach gifts of god (like children) and to help them become that which they will be (indaviduals near their own personality and thoughts and things) We can as parents hand over that which we feel to be best (what our parents did or not hand over us) but unlike a car which go were you yearning to take it, we must adopt without query the road our children choose to take. It is call free will. We can only, as parents whatch from the side lines and be the comforter if it go wrong and the encourager for that which goes right. We habitually show our pride when our children do well within life, Sometimes we are guilty of stealing thier achievement "my son is... my daughter does." These are things they have done on thier own. That is why we don`t enjoy a licence.

Can a non-disclosude agreement stop you from reporting illegal entertainment.?

I'm specifically wondering about reporting a serious copyright vandalism to the rightful copyright holder so they can take doesn`t matter what action they necessitate to.
Answers: No private contract can legally prevent you from reporting crooked activity.

But---and you must mind your Ps and Qs here---"whistle blower" laws may or may not protect you from human being fired as a result of your disclosure. The whole view of whistle-blower laws is within fact in principle new. In my own state, for example, the whistle-blower statute will protect an individual only if they hold first reported the violation to the appropriate being within the company, and after given the company a certain amount of time to purloin action themselves. If they fall short to take conduct, the individual is then protected if they report to outside authorities. This is around "par for the course" as far as legal protection for whistle-blowers. But you should definately ask a advocate or check the laws surrounded by your own state: you may be completely protected, or you may be less protected.

If you don't want to risk human being known as the creature who "blew the whistle" there is other the anonymous letter.
Probably not. But capture legal support from a licensed lawyer previously you take deed.

Whistle blowers often attain punished for their honesty. Sometimes there's another way to report the crime where on earth they can't trace it back to you.

Remember that no righteous deed go unpunished.
No, it can not.
And in the event your employer found out you be the one who divulged that info, there is nil they can do to you.
If they take any endeavour against you, they are in ruin of the "whislte-blower" law.
If someone is violate the law, a non-disclosure agreement can not be enforced against you for reporting the defiance.

Edit - "whistle blower" laws largely only protect governing body employees but to be exact not really the issue here.
No, it cannot. Having said that I'm going to assume you are speaking of an employer/employee non-disclosure agreement and advise you base on that assumption.

Depending on what is covered under the agreement, I would first bring this to the attention of your superiors but not short making a copy of the file or paperwork first and putting it contained by a safe place away from your department. Be certain the information bear the name of your company or name employees inside it. You may very in good health need this within case something backfire. While it is within the kingdom of possibility that they are unaware of violate or infringing upon a copyright of some kind and contained by some way, I would almost bet they do indeed realize it since the copyrighted information have to be researched thoroughly by their own copyright attorneys. If you believe they are aware but are deciding to dither their bets and proceed despite this illegal hustle and bustle, I would seriously consider breaking ties with this company and seeking employment elsewhere. If and when you bring this to their attention be intensely careful surrounded by how you approach the issue so you don't lose your position by the time your conversation is concluded.

You'll need to ask yourself a few question. First and foremost, are you absolutely in no doubt that your company would be in defilement of copyright law and are you unquestionably certain the rightful owner does indeed hold the copyright? How do you consistency about clich¨¦ something to the copyright holder without unfolding your superiors? Can this come back to put you surrounded by a compromising situation in some agency? How do you feel almost giving your company the benefit of the doubt and not saying anything to the copyright holder? How do you have a feeling about dictum nothing at adjectives and simply allowing the situation to play out to its natural pause? If your company decides to forge ahead lacking regard to the existing copyright, how do you quality about continuing to work for them? By like peas in a pod token, if you know the copyright holder, can you look them in the eye again short blinking the next time you collect? Will your company ever put two and two together and know that you might be the person who tossed a wrench into this business business deal? What would happen if they did know and you former to mention it?

This is going to end up a event of conscience if all your facts are correct. Double check everything formerly you do anything then proceed base on what your higher self tell you to do. Good luck!
Mind your own business let the character face the music himself

Does the CIA and DEA really trace each money transaction that go to other countries ?

Via moneygram or western union.
Answers: Yes. But, one and only large transfers and transfers to suspect countries. They track lots of accumulate small transfers to and from the same individuals also.
For interest, in Australia the AUSTRAC agency files
a) all domestic transactions over $AUD10,000;
b) adjectives international transactions.

Banks, Western Union, Paypal etc must report all applicable transactions lower than the Anti Money Laundering/Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006. The agency then analyses the information and can distribute it to other parliament agencies where here is a suspicion of a breach of law.
i don't contemplate it will possible for them to trace every single one...they probably concern themselves with transfers over correct amount of zeros, to what country they are going to, and the sources both the sender and beneficiary...i'm guessing money laundering, terrorism, misuse are high on the record...otherwise, they really don't give a crap if i'm sending $50. to my aunt within panama next week...

If a mother is abusing her children's social surety benefits who do u report it to?

Answers: Report it to the Social Security office and they will check into if she abuse it they will take the children and achieve them to a relative to take thoroughness of them properly with the benefits that be intended for the care of them.
The local Social Security department has an anonymous tip vein for you to call and report what you know. They investigate from nearby.

More Questions and Answers:
[775] - [1092] - [1673] - [1656] - [1222] - [982] - [787] - [2495] - [1141] - [351] - [2286] - [1143] - [1219] - [2400] - [216] - [613] - [722] - [1504] - [33] - [2424]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: