Law Questions and Answers

Is it legal for a realtor to variation sales contract after street trader has signed short informing seller?

I sold a business on 11/1 that I enjoy poured all my vivacity & heart into for 10 years. It was an integral cog of my community and family. I tabled w/a realtor who did bring a few parties but no buyer. I down on Craig's list w/my realtor info and be approached by a woman and her family. She said she have a 'financial partner'. I liked her, I did not similar to the 'partner' at all. The Dutch auction proceeded and I fulfilled all my obligation happily.

The realtor acted as a dual agent. She be aware of my feelings for the partner. I signed the papers first. I rcvd the papers and didn't unscrew them thinking I knew what they said... I open them just a couple weeks ago and found that the mart was to the 'partner' simply! I contacted the realtor and she said they had call the woman and requested an email authorizing this change but she never contacted me and made the correct w/my signature already on the contract.

I believe the realtor was in recent times interested in her 10% & I want that $.
Answers: Let me draw from this straight, you are upset because they changes the label of the purchaser? So then they did not alter any of your information, and you got adjectives of the money that you agreed upon and you are concerned because you don't like the partner. Obviously it is off the record for them to make any change or alterations to the contract once you have signed it. The reality that they did so makes the contract null, however I don't take to mean why you would be receiving any more money. If anything. The complete sale would be canceled out and you would be hindmost at square one trying to sell your business. Please bestow more details and I will try to help.
No, it's clearly unendorsed.

An agent cannot change a signed document after the principal have signed. To do so is a crime.

Richard
The answer to you question: can a contract be signed, next changed without spot given to the signed party? Yes, it happen all the time! but, it is dubious!!! There is the burden of proof: you must prove your claim, otherwise, you will be an even bigger loser.

If the real estate agent made the renovation for self-serving purpose, or to benefit another party of the transaction, it is, probably surrounded by most states, also fraud; and, that means, to the regret of the agent's insurance underwriter, punitive damages which could amount to plentifully more than the agent's commission. If there is a big probability of you proving your claim in court; it would indubitably enhance the amount of any serious offer to settle.

If you commit a crime and enter a church for sanctuary, can you not be arrested whileever you are in that?

church? And does this apply to other religious buildings?
Answers: There is no allowed precedent of sanctuary in religious buildings. In the 1980's a Sri Lankan by the mark of Viraj Mendis was hiding surrounded by a church in Manchester and combat deportation. Early one morning the police knocked the door down and dragged him out within handcuffs consequently drove him to Manchester Airport and straight on the next plane to Sri Lanka. And he didnt really committ any crimes apart from overstaying his meet!!
You can still be arrested.

Sanctuary has no legally recognized standing in this country.

The foundation that - for example - ICE sometimes let's illegals stay in a church instead of going within after them is pure PR - there is no LEGAL justification for it.

Richard
yeah, the police will storm the place.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UEaLNDJ8I...
The law of the park does not end the moment you enter a church or any other religious place
If you enjoy or are suspected of having committed a crime, you can be arrested anywhere. There is no sanctuary imperative in the United Kingdom, so turn yourself within now.
Hollywood have a lot to answer for, if you confess to a murder at confession the priest cannot divulge any information to the police.
why not ?
1. Criminal decree does not recognise church land as individual a sanctuary
2. Constitutional law recognises a 'state' church surrounded by the UK as the Anglican Communion, but this does not impinge on criminal law.
3. In the US near is a constitutional division of state and religioun (though some have forgotten this recently)
4. Law enforcement agencies commonly try to afford alleged criminals opportunity to surrender (offer of peaceful solution at Waco and an assortment of sieges/hostage situations in UK) formerly reverting to violent assertion of legalized process
5. Who would decide which church offered sanctuary? Would be it be Anglican, Presbyterian, Muslim, Jewish, Roman Catholic, Hindii etc, etc. The factional character of religion is such that each believes they are the merely correct believers, and as such may offer sanctuary from the environmental bound laws.
6. Don't commit the crime and near is no need for sanctuary
7. If you commit crime of blasphemy don't want sanctiary in church...when a fatwa be issued against Salman Rushdie and Danish cartoonists churches across world gave single soft condemnation of the death threats, but said populace shouldn't critcise religion...
IF A PERSON BEING PURSUED AS A SUSPECT IN A CRIME, S/HE CAN BE PURSUED AND ARRESTED IN A CHURCH or any other building owned by a religious group.

The only building offering any probability of sanctuary would be, possibly, a Foreign Embassy (of a nation that does not extradite next to your country) and only to citizens of their country and, probably, depending on the crime for which the personality is being pursued.

Ones best hit and miss to evade pursuit and arrest is to get into a country that would not extradite them hindmost to their country, and we say right riddance.
Lol the police would probably put 3 miles of plice tape around the church consequently maybe 200 police officer will stand there consequently they will storm it but first they will have to form sure theres no illegals inside otherwise they would have to consult equal rights lawyer.

Visitation rights for father?

I live in MA and am currently going through a child support/visitation grip. The father and I are amicable and have no definite issues with one another, but we are doing this reasonably so that way neither one of us get in trouble subsequently on down the road.

He has be the one calling and finding out about child support and visitation rights because I feel he needed to take some responsibility and do this himself. (had he not, however, i would own filed myself) He claims that the advocate he spoke with said that it would be in his rights to have visitation every afternoon for 3 hours. This seems resembling its a bit much for visitation rights, and I have never hear of anyone being granted that much visitation. Where are my rights contained by that situation? That means I enjoy to be around for 3 hours every day so he can stop by the baby?

Just wondering if this made sense to anyone... or if this is ridiculous. I plan on calling a legal representative myself now to numeral out if this is something to be concerned about.
Answers: You are listen to HIS attorney, who is paid to represent the best interests of his client,,,,,,your ex.If your ex is asking for 3 hours a daylight, that is what the attorney will put printed. If you do not contest this, it could be entered into a court of imperative and become a provision of your paperwork. Please remember that you are NOT under any requisite to accept any provision as it is written by the other side. Unfortunately, since it sounds resembling the ex is not going to play fair near you, you will definetely need to procure your own attorney just so you can your own best interests brought forward. If he accept this, he may become reasonable when he see you have your own representation. If not, it become a slug fest in court and the single one who truly wins are the two attorneys who are salaried by the hour to fight for their clients.
PLEASE REMEMBER - This is HIS attorney, not yours. He will be asking for the moon for you and will settle for seriously less.

BUT - You must go and get your own legal representation and not rely on HIS. HIS is interested with the sole purpose in him, while YOURS will be interested just in you.
doubtful.

Fining the country of origin thought, fines.,highly developed tariffs or lower aid.I'm thinking $100,000 per undemocratic .

I think this would force the country of orgin to inforce border law!What do you think?
Answers: Yes, it would be pious to make other countries compensate - IF they take few/no precautions to prevent the human being from coming into the country. Even more so if they actively encourage this behavior, as does the Mexican parliament.

However, fines should be in millions, not thousands - government have vast pockets.

The problem is that you would never be able to bring the governments to agree to the 'fines'. Since they are sovereign nation, they can just take no notice of you.
looking at your Q&A i conclude you are one of the most innocent person on the planet! or are you from another planet?!

How much do you make as a rookie police officer contained by your city?

just wondering
Answers: not as much as they deserve - I'd say-so about $30,000 per year
$17.50 an hour

What is the last legally recognized week for abortion in Michigan?

Answers: 24 weeks maximum
Im from michigan and
own had one.


http://abortionsupportsite.blogspot.com
I believe surrounded by most state it is prior to the six month, which would be around 24 weeks.

My cousins states I can hunt in my own domain? what are laws?

He said if he owned my manor 4.5 acres, he would hunt quails and rabbits using one of those nouns rifles you can get minus a license? Is this legal? I live surrounded by arizona.
Answers: What do you want to go waste for?
You need a license to hunt regulated animals, even on your own topography. They also have season. Hunting out of season is called poaching, even on your own domain.

I need a California legal representative that specializes in domestic law and estate-planning.?

Does anyone know of a virtuous lawyer within the South Bay, preferably Torrance or Redondo Beach?
Answers: Call the California Bar Association, their phone number is listed contained by the book-they can give you referrels. (Also, FYI-the South Bay is considered San Jose, etc.Redondo Beach, Torrance, etc...is Southern California)
Go to the California banister website, www.calbar.ca.gov. Click on the "public services" button on the left mitt side. Click on "finding an attorney for legal direction." Go to the fourth bulletted item and click "Certified Legal Specialists." Select either "Estate Planning" or "Family Law" from the first verbs down menu. Select "Los Angeles" from the second pull down menu. When you find an attorney who is contained by the city you are interested in, click on the attorney's given name. You will get the attorney's contact information. The number of years the attorney have been practicing is toward the bottom of the peak. Good Luck!

If an atheist goes to court, does his swearing to the Bible count?

Answers: In my state, culture do not swear on the Bible in court nor do they utter "so help me God." The oath used contained by my state is: "Do you swear or affirm that the testimony you are in the region of to give is true, underneath penalty of perjury." People do still swear on the Bible if they longing when they are sworn into an elected office.
The witness is reasonably required to uphold the oath taken. The bible part of it is ceremonial and irrelevent.

If I ever have to testify though, I'd have trouble beside the oath itself. How can you swear to tell "the intact truth" when you're strictly limited to answering individual the questions asked of you?
As an atheist I would send regrets to swear on a bible. Fortunately I have not nonetheless had to interview how that would go.
Bring me a broken up table of the elements and I will swear on that.
Atheists don't swear on the bible, they just affirm they will update the truth. Seems plenty of Christians have no problem swearing on a bible and lying anyway.
I own testified within four federal proceedings, none of which used a Bible for either atheists or the loyal. I simply told officials ahead of time that I be atheist and to please affirm me rather than swear me. Easy peasy lemon squeezy.
The influential thing is the describing the truth
David's answer is typical of most States these days.

One bit of trivia... Under English adjectives law (Which is the idea for all American law) anyone who be "forsworn", ie who was prearranged to have lied below oath in days gone by, could not be sworn in beforehand testifying. They would testify unsworn, and the jury would be advise of why. This practice didn't make it into American practice, though. (I preference it had, knowing some of the lying scumbags that own no problem swearing before they pinch the stand and lie through their teeth.)

Richard
First of adjectives, if an atheist appeared in court, and did not decision to swear on the Bible, they would make an "affirmation", to some extent than an oath. However, if they proceeded to take the oath next to their hand on the Bible, next the oath would be binding.

In legal slang, an "oath" and an "affirmation" are not the same item. An oath is a promise to tell the truth next to one's hand on the bible or another religious god (in many states, if you are not Christian, you may ask to swear on the blessed text of your out of the ordinary religion).

An "affirmation" is specifically the non-religious equivalent of the oath. You do not place your hand upon the bible when you product an "affirmation." As a matter of constitutional tenet, a court must accept any an oath or an affirmation as absolutely equivalent: they cannot discriminate against you contained by any way because you choose to engineer an affirmation rather than an oath.

As David said, within many states they will presently simply ask: "Do you swear or affirm."

Interesting trivia: When making an affirmation, it is customary to raise one's right paw into the air beside the palm open. This is an extremely outmoded custom. In the middle ages, before centralized criminal library existed, courts would signify a felony conviction by branding the guilty party contained by various places (including the fleshy element of the right hand) with a small memo or symbol to signify the person's crime. (For example, "T" would mean "thief"). Then, as presently, felons be disqualified from giving testimony underneath oath. By raising their right mitt, a person would show that they be free of branding marks, and and so able to reasonably give nouns.

Child abandonment within kentucky?

in ky if a parent whose entitle isnt on a birth certificate, but know theyre the parent but doesnt make any contact or relieve financillay support the child, how long is it before its forsaking and what is done about this? is parental rights terminated?
Thank You,
Missy
Answers: Paternity have to be established first either by a DNA testing or by the father saying the child is his. He would hold to sign his rights over, it doesn't matter how long he have not been contained by the picture.

Now if he had gone the child say for a week somewheres afterwards that would be abandonment and he would probably lose custody.
If they are not tabled on the birth certificate and no court establish has be issued, they have no parental rights or child support prerequisite.

There are things that can change the broad in specific cases, so you should speak beside a lawyer if you are involved within an actual case.
you should get to Court for child support, and when it comes time for the hearing, the authority will order them to wages child support. The Courts frown upon terminating any parents parental rights because it also bastardizes a child. (Not that I cam calling your child a bastard, to be exact the legal term) Most Courts embargo to do it, unless the case is really extreme. I'm a paralegal and your best bet is to attain him in to Court and try to obtain child support, if he doesn't pay next he will go to intern, and then try to enjoy his parental rights taken away, but the fact that he have not been in that or taken financial responsibility will not be enough produce for the court to terminate. (Sad But true) Good Luck Sweetie! PS I see the comment above mine that says if you enjoy no signed birth certificate or court decree, he has no condition and that is a adjectives misconception, but at least here is SC I know explicitly false. The law states, that no parent requests to be put on notice that they own an obligation to filch care of their child, i.e. a given.

More Questions and Answers:
[2234] - [80] - [1594] - [1447] - [724] - [712] - [2011] - [908] - [2301] - [1605] - [1747] - [236] - [1500] - [1923] - [1281] - [1118] - [926] - [202] - [2395] - [77]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: