Law Questions and Answers
Can I use somebody else's legal contract minus copyright infringement?
I have an online classified website and stipulation a terms of service and privacy policy. Is it bent for me to take another site's contracts (like Craigslist) and use it as my contract as long as I run out "Craigslist" and put it my company name?I've spoken to a couple of lawyer and they told me that I could do this and that there be nothing I could be sued for because here aren't copyrights on legal documents. Is this true?
Answers: There may be aspects of any document, including legitimate documents, that are protected by copyright. It's impossible to say surrounded by your situation whether that's true without reviewing the document. There is no bright-line rule surrounded by copyright law that trial documents cannot be entitled to protection by copyright.
That said, I would be surprised if a typical "Terms of Service" on a website has any protectable aspects. Even so, I'd be even more surprised if someone come after you for infringement.
Edit: Just to clarify a previous answer, under current U.S. regulation, a copyright notice (e.g., the copyright symbol) is unanimously beneficial, but is not necessary to receive copyright protection. Generally speaking, a nouns of a copyright notice is not necessarily an indication that you are free to copy a work.
Interesting. If the decriminalized document you wish to copy (then cut and fasten your name, product description, services, etc) is not evident with any form of the copyright symbol, I guess you can do so. Probably because the document is spelled out as to proper form somewhere, and the one you wanted to copy be modeled after some original document.
Watch out, though, because the Copyright Law of 1975 added a few court alternative forms. (C) is a copyright symbol as is (c) (lowercase c). The little c in a circle is another. But nearby is precedent for spelling out the claim of copyright in some prominent place. Also keep watch on out for the clause "all rights reserved" or variation thereof. That's another one that can catch you napping if you aren't scant.
How long (weeks or months) do you have to wallet an unemployment claim contained by Michigan?
My husbands boss laid him off or anything on October 31 (told him not to come back until a knees injury was healed) Now we are man told that he can/could have file for unemployment.Answers: Below is the intermingle to the Michigan Unemployment site. It will answer your questions. If your husband be laid off and NOT on medical leave your job, he may qualify but check the CORRECT sources as the other answer you received here may not be correct.
http://www.unemploymentoffice.net/State_...
That information is incorrect. You cannot file severance when you are on medical leave (even if you are not human being paid for it). You call for to be available and able to work when applying for job loss.
Hello, Im wondering if anyone knows a righteous constitutional lawyer?
Im looking for my brother-in-law who is interested within finding a good constitutional attorney. He lives in Michigan but is looking for a legal representative either contained by michigan or out of state that might be willing to appropriate a look at his case. Any info would facilitate. please let me know asap. gratitudeAnswers: Sounds like you might entail a civil rights attorney? Call the MI state bar on Monday and ask for a referral...OR...you can do a turn out through the Yellow Pages for Michigan or also on the Martindale Hubbell website.
There is no such thing as a "constitutional lawyer". There are criminal lawyer defending constitutional rights. There are real estate lawyer defending constitutional rights. There are divorce lawyers defending constitutional rights.
In writ to help you surrounded by your search, we call for to know a little more in the region of the case and what your BIL is trying to accomplish.
How to Copyright your own website?
Do you need to register near fees?And ...?
Answers: Once you create something, it should automatically be considered copyrighted. All you really need to do is make the addition of a copyright notice on your site somewhere (like the bottom of page or in a FAQ/About section).
I believe it's trademarking (like registering a name) that requires contribution fees.
Original authorship on a website is protectable by copyright law, which includes schoolbook, artwork, photographs, audiovisual material, nouns recordings, and other forms of authorship. Copyright protection exists from the time the work is fixed in physical form.
Registration is not necessary to protect the copyright within the work. However, there are significant advantages to registering your work. For example, you mostly cannot sue for copyright infringement until your work is registered. Registration does require a relatively small fee to the Copyright Office, and it is usually simple plenty that you can do it yourself without an attorney..
As within the case of other copyrighted materials, a website should include a spot of copyright ownership, which should be in the form of (i) the circle c or surrounded by the alternative, the word "Copyright" or the abbreviation "Copr."; (ii) the year of first publication of the work; and (iii) the mark of the owner of the copyright in the work.
To register a website beside the U.S. Copyright Office, you should refer to Circular 66, which addresses online works and the appropriate forms to use for registering online works. Circular 66 is related below.
http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ66.ht...
Waste of time
How would you monitor it? Millions out there
Don't verbs someone will be willing to transport your money to do it
Published works are automatically copyright - you don't have to do anything. However, contained by court the problem is often proving who created a disputed work first. You can register your design near the Library of Congress (useful in international disputes) or do it the cheap and jammy way. Print a copy of respectively page of the site, and put them in an envelope. Send the envelope to yourself by correspondence, but DO NOT open the envelope! If you ever obligation proof of when you created the content, the date on the stamp from the post office is sufficient, as long as the envelope is still hermetically sealed.
How much $ to sue over a haircut?
this salon have ruined my friend's hair and rly brought her down during the holidays. because of that morbid style of this korean place that didn't do what was asked and wont return your money ... it's not mostly something like the money but that it affected her system, put her into mild depression and prevented her from living her existence, and DURING THE HOLIDAYS like I said!what is the best point to do in this situation? how much would it cost to sue the place? and what is possible to be gained?
or short necessarily suing the place, what could be said to intimidate the haircutter, who generally also owns the place, into returning your money fund? because it's all a conspire with them, it's give or take a few saying the precise words because they're kinda used to taking benefit like this and adage the right things to get out of stuff approaching these without returning your money.
they merely need to be stopped.
Answers: Okay everyone seem to be jumping your shield here over a simple question.
Actually, if her mane is damaged she CAN sue the stylist within small claims court, small claims court is designed for cases like that, she would not be "clogging up the equality system" as it is designed for small suits under $5000 maximum allowance and it's not similar to she is attempting to take something to the Superior Court.
There is a payment to file the claim so she should check that out because I'm pretty sure it differs from state to state. It is nought she would need to retain a legal representative for as most lawyers wouldn't pilfer that case anyway. Small claims court - contained by most cases - does not have lawyer present.
Your friend could reasonably ask for a reimbursement of the cost of the haircut which they own already refused her (I agree that she should not own paid for the service surrounded by the first place) but perhaps she didn't realize the extent of the bring down at that time. She could also ask for a reimbursement of the cost accrued to fix her dog-eared hair at another salon. She would not be awarded any nice of punitive damages or anything of that nature but she could most promising get the reimbursement and return.
Another avenue is to double check that the stylist she initially used is even licensed at all. Sometimes inhabitants conveniently skip that step and move on to practice within their own business. If they are not licensed and are cutting and styling tresses, there could be repercussions for that.
If she still feel wronged she may also file a claim beside the Better Business Bureau and report the businesses outlandish behavior and unethical conduct. Most credible nothing will come of this, but it may remain on the account of the business and prevent others from having indistinguishable outcome of your friend.
If it's just a discouraging cut, with no interfere with, most likely, nil can be done.
Anyway, people stipulation to be aware of their rights as consumers and not simply take what others dish out to them.
It's relatives like you that cram the court system beside 'junk' lawsuits.
Why did she pay for it surrounded by the first place? Nonpayment would have be MY first move...
Answering your questions directly:
"what is the best entry to do in this situation?"
Let it run. Life's short. Don't go put a bet on.
"how much would it cost to sue the place?"
It depends on the jurisdiction. In the US, small claims court actions are typically something like $120 to file, but it could be anywhere from free to $500+
"and what is probable to be gained?"
If she won (which is a big IF), after your friend would only acquire the cost of her haircut rear, unless she went and saw a psychiatrist for her depression, and the psych said that the depression be a result of the negligently bad hairstyle. Then she'd be able to go and get her psych bill paid, too.
Frivolous lawsuit
I read your other quiz and I'm not sure you even understand what subjugation even means. So she get a bad style, life go on. It's not worth the time to actually pinch this lady to court.
No, you can't. Unfortunately, and despite popular evaluation, you can't sue someone just for pissing you rotten. Or even for ruining your holidays and making you depressed because of a bad hairstyle. I mean, really.
There are permissible requirements for suing people. You own to have lost something -- something you can count, or at least possible valuate. In other words, if they had cut sour her ear and she had medical bills, she could sue. If they poisoned her beside hair dye and she missed work, she could sue. If she tripped and fell within their bathroom, she could sue. If they did something that killed her, her ancestral could sue. But for this? No way.
While I'm sure her mane was traumatic and depressing, so is watching Christmas movies over the holidays when you don't own family around -- does that expect you can sue the airlines for making flights too expensive for you to afford? Of course not. Your friend will have to take over having a crappy holiday close to many other inhabitants.
Also, intimidating a hairdresser and pestering people who clearly already aren't too bright and breezy with you into doing anything is a fritter away of time, is totally not worth the effort, and it will gross an already really stupid situation even worse. Cut your losses, tell your friend to not move about back to that salon (and recount other people to boycott it as well) and get hold of over it.
Have you ever been truthful surrounded by court and it backfired on you?
Answers: If you don't know how to testify, it may backfire on you. A defense attorney will try to turn an individuals words around contained by an attempt to ruin credibility. Doing this will cause an feature of doubt. You never use the words possibly, maybe, or I'm pretty sure. Of course I'm referring to if you're the subject.
Well, if you tell the truth, it shouldn't backfire. If you're honest, here shouldn't be any consequences unless you REALLY DID do something wrong...
Can i make an ceremonial complain about my previous company?
i worked for 20 months for a pharmaceutical company. i asked if i can hold english courses to help me next to my grammar and vocabulary . the HR never come back to me.i go to see the HR manager for racist joke and harassement because this situation was undermining my opportunity. the HR manager didn't want to obtain involved and ask me to sort out this problem myself. so after all this time i contracted to find an other job. and i not here 2 days before the come to an end of my notice. the company contacted my exotic employer to inform them about this.
is it something i can do? for instance shift to court
thank you
Answers: If you are in th UK you could contact ACAS, they are within the phone book and online.
How long ago was this? If only just, you can claim constructive dismissal. But you really should have served out your distinguish period. Why did you hand down two days before? Was nearby some event that triggered your early departure?
Really, you should enjoy sought legal direction when the HR manager did not address the joke and harrassment.
If the harrassment was of a sexual or cultural nature you can appropriate the matter to a tribunal even though you have not been contained by your job two years. Without a claim of sexual or cultural discrimination, you would hold had to be employed for a full 24 months.
I do have difficulty knowledge why you expected your employer to pay for English programme. In fact, I own a problem with your person employed in the first place if you be not proficient in English. I achieve the impression that you are not unfolding us the whole story. For example, be you ever advised by your employer that they would enjoy to let you progress if your English language skills did not reorganize?
Can I also ask why your Q&As are blocked?
You will need to first tilt a grievance and follow the procedure. An employment tribunal may be another way to bring back this sorted, so try your local CAB.
How do i file small caims within the state of washington?
i only have a verbal contract for building this house, the structure be built in alaska and the party was a friend of mine. clearly not anymoreAnswers: Short answer for your question: look in the county courthouse and talk to the clerk. Filing a small claims lawsuit within Washington is a very confident process: you fill within the paperwork, pay the file fee (about $150), and enjoy someone unrelated to the lawsuit serve the papers on the defendant.
Longer answer, though: Depending on the amount of money in dispute, small claims may not be capable of rule in the amount you want (I deduce it's limited to $5000 max). For a construction contract for indisputable property in Alaska, you may obligation to file suit within Alaska, not Washington. Verbal contracts used to be limited to $600 or smaller number; that may have changed since I be in tenet school. Small claims courts can charge money payment, but can't lay down specific performance; if you want your ex-friend to finish building the house, the small claims court can't command that.
A fellow washingtonian, fight the power.
Is it against the law not to compensate employees on their induction light of day? (UK question)?
I just received my first retribution slip and I see that they only rewarded me for 1 hour on my first day. I be there from 10 - 3, so 5 hours but they merely paid me for one. I infer they did this because I was in actuality on the tills (I work as a sales assistant surrounded by Boots) from 2 -3, the rest of the time I was watching form and safety video, signing papers and going through all the requirements and things I enjoy to do.Answers: i would go 4 it girl what you get 2 lose
You don't have to complain, merely ask if your wages are correct as you were surrounded by from 10-3 but only get paid for 1 hour. See what they read out, may just be an errror from wages department. You should own been salaried for it!
Good luck!
I certainly find it firm to believe an employer can deduct wages for time spent surrounded by staff training which in effect is what you be doing.
That's all segment of your job and you be present at your place of work.
I've never come across this before and I business with training a large amount in the public sector.
I suggest you do need to angle the issue with your instantaneous supervisor.
Yes you should have be paid, you be giving up your time to train for your position.
It is likely a short time ago a error with a company resembling boots, speak to wages, you don't need to step in sturdy with a complaint.
Instead of blowing your top and putting the boss offside. Why dont you in recent times query this at the conclude of your next shift.
Its not prohibited but most companies do pay for the induction training.
If you ask you will recieve.
I remember my first errand, I had 3 hours induction training on a Monday and started on the Thursday.
I wasnt salaried for the training until the second paycheck so only can find out whats up.
It is wrong and could be a genuine error so hold a word with your direct supervisor first of all and afterwards take it complex you were acting beneath the instructions of the Company as part of your employment
Why are liberals stooping so low?
I mean, wow, Bush doesn't even live nearby anymore.http://www.oaoa.com/news/home_11957___ar...
Mark Knox worked so hard to restore a windowpane on the restored Bush home behind the Presidential Museum that the fanlight frame is named after him.
The pane appears undamaged, but much of the house’s front entryway and living room aren’t after an early Thursday morning fire — already name as arson — damaged the historic home located on East University Boulevard, official said.
“There is no reason for such a point,” Knox, 76, said of the arson attempt.
Firefighters were call to the restored Bush home at 3:04 a.m. Early investigation shows the fire likely started on the front, concrete porch fundamental the wooden doorway, Odessa Fire Marshal Detra White said.
A fire destroyed part of Knox’s flower business’ property once, but the Bush fire angered him more because it be intentional, he said.
Answers: Bush Derangement Syndrome - example #13,906,825
Liberals are stooping low so that neocon snakes, slithering on their bellies in the muck, can hear them lacking shouting.
And they are saying "You are a troll. you own no proof and absolutely no aim to believe that this was done by liberals".
You enjoy jumped to the unjustified conclusion that a liberal (as opposing a garden variety vandal) cause the fire.
Warmest regards for a sunny holiday season and a joyous 2008.
Suz deMello
http://www.suzdemello.com
Really now?
How do you PERSONALLY know it be a politically liberal person who started the fire?
Could it be a disgruntled citizen? Perhaps an angry mother? Maybe an seething immigrant who is sick of being bash?
People shouldn't throw stones at glass houses, bub.
More Questions and Answers:
[214] - [662] - [1061] - [1291] - [1944] - [7] - [1370] - [466] - [150] - [1590] - [1422] - [1664] - [931] - [324] - [122] - [2332] - [1266] - [1844] - [2342] - [205]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: