Law Questions and Answers

If your boss tells you to do a duty with illustrious quality, what is your definition of lofty quality contained by percentage?

Answers: it should be damn near surefire, I would do the job as if I be doing it for myself, although I have a better eye than most when it comes to details

100%

I enjoy worked with individuals who think they are purchase by doing the least possible work. But they are the losers. When you do shoddy work, you can't rob any pride in it, you can't get hold of any satisfaction from it, you're wasting everybody's time, including your own.

An emergency situation may excuse a trespass, but you still have to reimburse the other guy for damages?

iN AN EMERGENCY SITUATION A TRESPASS MAY BE EXCUSED BUT DONT YOU STILL HAVE TO PAY DAMAGES?

For example, my house is afire and I need the hose from your swimming pool to pump it and put out the fire. Your not home so I go ahead and trespass and pocket your water. In the process I break your wall. The emergency situation may excuse the trespass but I still have to wage you back for the damages right???

I'll nick any legal push for I can get but for what it is worth, I am surrounded by california.

Answers: Necessity would excuse the crime, but you would still be civilly liable for any damages.

First of all, why would you hold no fire extinguishers? That was stupid of you. But I guess I become conscious.

Second of all, yes, you would money completely for the fence. Why wouldn't you? I can't even devise of ONE reason you can pass off as to why you breaking the obstruction is not your fault.

Oh, and you would repay for the water you took, too. But with the sole purpose if it was a loooot of dampen. Otherwise it wouldn't be worth my time to try to get that money out of you.

This massively same situation happens around here rather often. We hold a lot of volunteer fire departments and normally times they have to draft or shuttle river from various places to a fire scene. Most of the time this will be done when a fire hydrant is exclusive or when area wet pressure is low. Sometimes a large swimming pool will suffice. But I hold seen them acquire water from lake, rivers, and even water treatment plants.

In this one instance, I would imagine that the fire department would own to take responsibility for hurtful whatever property they have to damage contained by order to buy the water they needed to do their commission. Remember not to be ungrateful about it. If they broke down a obstruction, I am certain it be for a legitimate basis.

I would also check with your insurance company to see if you would be covered for this type of situation. I don't see why you wouldn't be.

When a judge does not follow the decree?

Why no one said report this? How? by writing to the commission on Judicial Conduct. You simply don't lick your wounds , you learn fray for what is right!

Answers: Michelle-I'm not positive what you're asking, but you do report it to what my state calls "The Judicial Standards Commission." They're removed three courts this year. You also file an appeal if the travel case is over. If the case is not over, you database a "Writ of Superintending Control" with your appellate court. Perhaps my state is different, but these pilfer precedent over all other cases and are hear by our Supreme Court every Wednesday morning. They slapped down several judges by the superintending control power this year also. So, you do conflict it and you fight it surrounded by every possible way. We hold three purely legal methods, but you also appropriate it to the media.

When a authority does not follow the law surrounded by deciding a crust, the best thing to do is to appeal. That is what an appeal is for.

From reading your previous question, I am guessing that your small claims case be in NYC. Here is a relationship to the website to tell you how to appeal.

http://www.nycourts.gov/courts/nyc/small...

I was run rotten the road by a drunk driver who was arrested. do I hold a lawsuit case??

I be run off the road by a Drunk driver a couple of days ago, a man be driving 80 in a 25 mph zone and cut a thorny left going towards me runing me rotten the road I nearly hit a pole. Im wondering if I can sue this person at adjectives for anthing possibly? I was told by my friend who be in ruling school that I may know how to sue this person but im not going to properly consult untill i get some more direction. thanks

Answers: What are your actual damages?

Were you hurt?
Was your vehicle worn out?

Without damages I don't see what there would be to sue for?

And trust me, the idiot will be paying out the flipside for years to come, so he will "get his" short you spending an ounce of your effort or time.

Was at hand any monetary damage to you?

You cannot go and get monetary damages unless you suffered monetary loss. If you went to the doctor to be checked out, that would be collectable, and any time bad of work to go to the doctor.

The truth is that it sounds like nil really happened to you and you are looking for a free ride. If explicitly the case, I articulate that it is disgusting, and it is people who do this character of crap who are clogging up our courtrooms so legitimate cases dawdle years to be heard. If this is the armour, grow up and take some responsibility for yourself and stop looking to free-load rotten of the system.

Edit: Great. I am glad to hear that you are not fishing. Yes, all medical will be rewarded by insurance. Do not accept anything that states that you cannot further claim if you own further expenses. You might also be entitled to damages caused by your mental nouns. I would say that if you are not the free loader, return with what you are TRULY entitled to and do not go for a multi-million dollar settlement, consequently best of luck to you, and be sure to get your attorney's fees compensated by the other person.

One final thought...if they did not own insurance, you will get zilch out of them, so do not waste your $$$ trying.

Get a legal representative, sue the hell out of him and his insurance company (if he had insurance).

Phur

The just thing you can sue for, I would assume, are damages. If your car be damaged, if you have to go to the hospital, if you missed time from work for injuries, etc. Beyond that, he's surrounded by the hands of the statute now. Let them button it and don't sweat it, just be greatful you weren't hurt.

I can't abet but think that you're only just looking for easy money here. If you own to ask what you can sue for, it sounds like you're fishing for an excuse.

If adjectives he did was piss you sour then the one and only thing is perchance a libel suit ?

Did you get so cracked that you were incompetent to transact an important business contract that would have made you a couple million $ right after and there ?

This undoubtedly cause you a delay surrounded by your trip to __________ where you be going to _
________ which would result in _________ that will not immediately take place, cause you to___________ which requires re-investing $_________ at a rate much lower than what your life strategy have planned for !

?????????????????????????????????

Is it illegal to enjoy camera outside my home?

Answers: no.

As long as it doesn't intrude on the personal space of your neighbors then it is without blemish legal...

BUT

If you can clearly see inside the house of the those across the street from you or on either side later they can take issue near your camera.

But that is solely if they KNOW that you can see in side their house... So as long as you are not doing it near the entent of spying or snooping then in recent times don't show them exactly how far your camera can see.

You have the right to protect yourself and your property and a Camera is included contained by that...

I wish I have one to record the illicit and annoying activities of the restruant below my apartment but I guess that will lately have to continue until I can save up! ;-)

Yes, it depends on where on earth it is pointed. It'd be hard to prove that you needed to "investigate" your hot neighbor. Better not dangerous than sitting in the slammer.

What rights are protected in the US today by the 19th amendment?

is it purely the suffrage of all citizen women? or is here more to the rights that the amendment protects today? thanks

Answers: Just general womens sufferage in the US. Nothing else, the total Amendmant reads close to this, " The right of citizens of the United States shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on picture of sex. Congress shall have the power to enforce this Article by appropriate legislation."

It protects the right of adjectives women to vote, regardless of mental capacity. Just as the 15th protected the right of anyone of any see to vote, regardless of mental capacity; and the 26th protected the right of anyone over the age of 18 to vote, regardless of mental dimensions.

My brother went to intern for shooting?

My brother dated a girl who live w/ her ex. she claim that she pregnant with him afterward dumped him when she be still with child. The babe-in-arms is now born he want to pop in his kid but somehow she and her ex is back together. They wouldn't allow my bro to see his toddler. (it might even be his kid)

My bro used drug to overcome his emotion and go to his ex apt one night and have a huge argument. He aim the gun in the upper air and accidental shot his ex apt. his ex & her bf presses charged against him and claim of not knowing my bro. she didn't appear contained by court so the state took over the case.

(* I own proof that they use to date but would it help my bro?)

He enjoy 3 days left in the past his final hearing. his substitute was to plead guilty prison for 5 years or hold on to fighting but if found convicted prison 16 years. We don't own enough money for a legal representative. I need to know if theres anyone who experience this or own any advice? any proposal would help.

Answers: 1st of adjectives is your brother black? it's sounds messed up, but if he is, he needs to freshly plead guilty now.

and what are they recounting him to plead guilty to?

i think besides making the gf look close to an incredible witness, it really doesn't matter. he still shot her, and she can press charges for that. in reality i think it would look WORSE if the court see evidence they were dating. i suggest seriously, all the stuff you wrote looks SO BAD for his covering. it looks more premeditated. unless they are also going to be charging him with trespassing, as surrounded by he's just some hit or miss dude who came contained by their place n started shooting. then i would read out they did know each other n he be allowed in.

but, if he's white, i would verbs fighting it. but that's if i be innocent. cuz how does "shooting a gun in the air" accidentally get hold of a bullet into a woman? sounds like a deceit to me & sounds guilty to me... but since the witness didnt even show up or anything, idk... this is a tuffy cuz it's always seem to me that public defenders occasionally have the defendee's best interest contained by mind.

Five years sounds like other for a guy that got soaring, took a gun and confronted a family, including a child, in their own home.

The public champion is doing a good charge here. Your brother should probably take the operation.

The fact of the situation is your brother shot someone and needs to income for his crime. As far as a plea agreement it's really up to your brother and his attorney - if they don't believe the state has evidence sufficient to support their shield and your brother's attorney thinks he can draw from your brother aquitted then by adjectives means quarrel to the end. If, then again the state has sufficient evidence to support their casing against your brother then I'd hold the plea agreement simply because serving 5 years and getting out is a lot better than spending nearly twenty years within prison.

If I'm understand correctly too, your brother be on drugs when he committed this crime. If this is the case, they may know how to negotiate a little bit more and read out if he goes into drug treatment and anger regulation then he'll avoid prison altogether.

BTW: I am NOT an attorney, I've be a paralegal since 2001 so please don't take any of this as legalized advice - speak to an attorney as soon as you can.

Good luck.

Is it legal for a cop to lift your gun after...?

Scenario: Your boyfriend kills himself within your apartment. You legally own a gun for purposes of self-protection. (You own been attacked in the past.) A cop claims that the gun poses as a danger to you and, because he doesn't want you to waste yourself, takes your gun and puts it within evidence. He says you can find it back when you enjoy been evaluated psychiatrically by a doctor. However, you never alluded to wanting to wipe out yourself or said anything along the lines of wanting to die. All you did was simply cry over your boyfriend's corpse.

Is it decriminalized for the cop to do this?

Answers: Based on these limited facts, within the US--It was official for him to take the gun into evidence if it be used in the suicide. If that casing has be closed, you should be able to petition for return of the gun, in need a psychiatric evaluation.

Did your boyfriend kill himself next to that gun? Then yes, it was completely court. You should be able to bring the gun back by file a petition once the investigation is complete.

If not, you should be able to progress to the police station and fill out some consent and liability forms and carry your gun back.

Seems similar to a weird scenario -- mostly because A) a cop doesn't necessitate a reason to purloin a gun, and B) they never bother to explain anything.

It's always officially recognized for them to take a gun that might be evidence. Was the gun used when the boyfriend iced himself?

Legal question! Are we responsible? If not, how do we obtain rid of the charges? HELP!!?

When my daughter was 16, she open a checking account, in need my consent. She got out of paw and wrote some hot checks, now that she's 20..she can't start on a bank rationalization because she still owes the old mound $700. Can the hold a person in charge for charges incured when they were a minor? We live surrounded by Oklahoma. If we aren't accountable what do we obligation to do to get them taken past its sell-by date? I need legit answers, post links first! Thank you much!

Answers: Your daughter is accountable. If she requirements to open a fresh account, she will want to settle up with the mature bank.

You and your daughter may both be responsible. Your daughter may be criminally liable.

Pay it past its sell-by date and move on near your life.

I have a similar situation. I was not a minor, but I have nothing to do near the checks. My ex wife and I had an article together. After the divorce she kept the account and I never have my name taken bad. Well 2 years later I be remarried and moved to a different state. My new wife and I go to open a investigational account and they would not tolerate me be on the account. Come to find out my ex wife have written 450 dollars in hot checks on the antiquated account. I tried to fray the issue and found out that I was still liable even though I did not write the checks or even live at the address where on earth she was when she wrote them. I completed up paying the money to the old mound just so I could get hold of on a new article with my current wife. So basically from my experience and seeing how your daughter did write the checks I would say you are going to hold to settle up and move on.

What should my fiance do? (work related incident)?

This is going to be a long story.

My fiance used to live with his mate but they fell out as he kept letting girls stay alone contained by his house and one of them was a invader...anyway my fiance moved out because basically the bloke said he wouldnt stop letting girls within...they also work together...they managed to be civil and pass on working together and its been over a year since then-nearly 2 years in actuality...day previously they finished work for xmas they had a row because my fiance disagreed next to this bloke view on a computer team game...my fiance said he didnt want to talk to him anymore as this bloke be getting a bit over the top and a small shouting match started...when they finished the store they be cleaning the bloke got surrounded by van and went to drive rotten...so my fiance grabbed the equipment and tried to capture in the van-but the bloke kept reversing until he be pinned against the walll and door-he managed to slide out and run to van door and took out car key.

Answers: I am in no route condoning the friends actions, because near is absolutely no root to take an argument that far.

If your fiance be a contributing party to the fracas, It's probably better to leave things how they are, and find some seemliness between themselves, so they are able to verbs working together. Because he would be just as much at mistake for the situation escalating to that point, and they may both loose their jobs if he pushes the situation.
If the argument was one sided, ( which by your explanation it sounds similar to it wasn't) then he should perversely take it to sophisticated management, or permitted officials.

Life is not worth that much trouble.
If the boss isn't gonna BE A BOSS next it's time form your other half to move to another livelihood. What the hell could happen subsequent.the van running over your fiance. Move on...

He should raise a grievance next to his employer and follow the procedure. It may well be that the boss will catch it sorted, but if not, after the procedure is followed, you can clutch it to an employment tribunal through CAB. An employer has a duty of perfectionism, and this may fall into that cateogory.

If your fiance be deliberately pinned by a company vehicle, and the nouns is not prepared to take goings-on against the driver, then he should remind the regulator concerned that this will be reported formally as a Health and Safety at Work complaint, and may also involve the police. This is assuming he feels it worth pursuing.

If they be both employed by the same firm next your fiance should expect more constructive support from the boss.

It seems resembling a straightforward case of Assault. He should report it to the police. This would simply get anywhere if he have evidence of the occurance. Perhaps there be a CCTV covering the van incident? Have a look around.

Unfortunately, without corroboration, he's unlikely to achieve satisfaction. It would be one man's word against the other and this would not do capably in court. With the best Will contained by the World the police couldn't get a conviction.

If you can attain evidence (proof) of the assault with the van later go ahead and press charges. If you can't go and get the proof then your best bet is to be supportive and sympathetic to your fiance and return with it behind you as soon as possible.

It seem as though his ex-friend is an agressive chap who doesn't contemplation who he hurts, or how. You can never 'win' against these people. They will verbs to escallate a dispute until someone becomes REALLY hurt. You must stop it presently.

Don't encourage your fiance to want violent "revenge".
If he does that consequently he will be the guilty party, and even if he doesn't procure his head kicked surrounded by, the other man will call the police and your fiance will acquire a criminal record.

That may not seem to be fair but if you cogitate about it "coldly" you'll see that it would be inevitable. So don't receive into that situation.

More Questions and Answers:
[1279] - [387] - [589] - [397] - [2166] - [1694] - [2533] - [1368] - [2262] - [2268] - [1942] - [389] - [2349] - [2297] - [674] - [917] - [2284] - [1571] - [1609] - [2058]

The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.

Answer question: