Law Questions and Answers
Should misrepresenting data within 'studies' be made illegal?
For example:When feminists made rape studies, they released their 'results' claiming one within four women were raped. Yet, these women themselves - consent to alone the men 'responsible' - were not even remotely aware they have been 'raped' (by feminist definition).
So, we know the nonspecific population's interpretation of rape is that of a gruesome & violent crime. However, the feminist definition included repeat 'requests' (nagging for nookie) and exchange of favours (bribes).
Is it 'fair' to claim that one surrounded by four women are 'raped' when indeed they are not - specifically not according to Joe Blogg's definition of the word.
Additionally, the same notes released included a mathematical error which, if memory serves certainly made the reality closer to one contained by eight. And that did not account for the forty-some percent of women who did NOT agree they have been 'raped'.
Based on the facts and accounting for the pouring repercussions of this crime, should misrepresenting this be made illegal? (1 surrounded by 4)
Answers: Researchers have the right to operationally set down the variables they are studying in any comportment they wish. We, as the critical reader, later have the RESPONSIBILITY to assess those definition and determine their validity and reliability. Not have the study to which you refer in front of me I cannot address the nouns of the specific study you quote; however, as a serious social researcher I can tell you that I ALWAYS read the productive study to make my own determinations of the merits of the study.
It should not be made immoral. In essence, we would be punishing people for the crime of interpreting words or philosophy differently.
I abhor the false rhetoric used in such 'studies'. However, I would not want to be subject to punishment if those folks be to have sufficient political power to punish me for interpreting things differently than they do.
Groups similar to the Rape Crisis Center need to prove ever-larger budgets, so they'll seek study interpretations to bloat their potential customer stub. They get more money if they can claim in that are more 'victims'.
Ladies - carry a gun and swot how to use it effectively. Don't be a victim.
It should be but here is no way to really police it.
By it's terrifically nature a statistic can be used to prove both sides of an argument depending how you run the numbers..so would of late wrap us all contained by even more red tape.
Should rape be punished..Hell Yeah!
Should false accusation of rape be punished just nearly as severly...Hell Yeah!
Is begging for sex from your signif other/spouse rape..NO
Is offering to buy a coat surrounded by exchange for sex rape..NO (although lightly fits protistution)
Should same standerds apply to women as to men...Hell Yeah! (meaning if guy be drunk then women raped him)
If both man and woman be drunk and had sex should lone one be charged with rape..No..since both be drunk then both raped the other
1) After reading your quiz I do have to reply, tongue firmly surrounded by cheek, "well, if Joe Bloggs say so.it MUST be right!"
2) Based on your description of events, I would be reluctant to classify your example as a misrepresentation -- the report was clear in the region of what, for purposes of the study, "rape" meant. There just seems to be any illusive intent.
3) If you've dealt next to studies on any level -- any as a student, or as someone conducting or designing studies -- then you without question already know that, to a large point, you can design a study to reach anything conclusions that you want it to reach. We (fellow students, professors, etc.) used to recurrently joke something like the validity of studies, and study design, by aphorism "tell me what you want me to find, and I'll describe you how to find it." My point is that if someone wants a study to support the hypothesis that, read out, one in fifty women contained by the U.S. are raped, such a study can be designed. If someone wants a study to support the hypothesis that, right to be heard, one in three women contained by the U.S. are raped, that study can also be designed. Studies are informative but, goodness know, they can be shaped just close to anything else, to meet ones requirements. That's not to say that I agree/disagree near the statistics you've described -- nor is it to say that I agree next to your take on them.
Should the humane of thing you hold described be illegalized? Heck no. Interpretation, semantics, these all come into play. Who is the final arbiter of "truth," who could step contained by and say "hey, you didn't represent this right.'cause Joe Bloggs say that isn't even rape!" Certainly not you. Or me. You disagree with the study? Come up beside your own, or cite others that in your feelings discredit the one you disagree with or that support what *you* give attention to is right. There's a role for debate here, and a place for challenges and disagreements. (I should point out, however, that responding to an oft cited study by dictum, for example, that one in four women "are indeed not" raped -- and this is the really sloppy slice -- "specifically according to Joe Blogg's definition of the word" rape is *not* the level of debate and intellectual taunt that I have within mind.)
Besides, if you illegalize what YOU (or some unnamed person, or whoever) consider to be a misrepresentation surrounded by a study.what are you going to do, incarcerate everyone who has reach those "faulty" or fallacious conclusions? (I'm discussion about the plane of alleged "misrepresentation" you're describing -- which is a different situation from, say, wilfully destroying data to skew results, etc., which I am not address.)
Wow. Talk about a "adjectives effect" on science (yes, social sciences are included)!
You are full of fallacious arguments I won't even try to address it one by one.
For example, you haven't cited a single instance where on earth anyone can see if you are just ranting or enjoy a valid point.
I am inlined to think that you read an inference piece and came to a different conclusion base on the evidence presented.
It seems you are skilful of reading critically, but not aware of how rhetoric woks by looking at the bigger picture of persuasion within the framework of solid method or any other framework.
But personally, I reckon there is a burr up your butt nagging at you in the region of something you did with a girl that come to the surface when you heard something within school.
I suggest you revise a lot more around persuasive writing Honestly, unlike many copious of your peers here, you exhibit potential, but it is far from realized however.
In the meantime, deal next to your personal demons about rape definition separately.
According to one feminist spokesperson: "The statistics don't really matter... We're only trying to focus on the real issue here [1 within 4 being women human being raped]... not bicker about numbers" http://www.deltabravo.net/files/ifmenhav...
Rape is a sickening crime and anyone who commits rape should be jailed. Unrealistic rape statistics don't comfort to solve rape crimes, and only stigmatise men surrounded by general and reinforce the climate of vicitmhood that women are supposed to quality.
Why do I think the '1 contained by 4' statistic is false? Because the term 'rape' is expanded to include act that most people would not muse of as rape:
"[t]oday’s definition of date or acquaintance rape stretches beyond act of violence or physical force. According to adjectives definitions of date rape, even vocal coercion or manipulation constitutes rape” (Roiphe, 1993, pp. 66–67) and “with such a sweeping definition of rape, I wonder how many society there are, masculine or female, who haven’t be date-raped at one point or another. People pressure and manipulate and cajole respectively other into all sorts of things adjectives the time” (Roiphe, 1993, p. 79).
I personally expect that the falsely inflated '1 contained by 4' statistic results in the stigmatisation of adjectives men. To the degree that men go and get falsely incarcerated - a massive violation that might include their man beaten and raped surrounded by prison - due to this stigmatisation, I think that those who propagate these false statistics are doing something bordering on hate-crime.
Should it be made evil? Probably not as could result in adjectives sorts of infringements of free speech in other areas. Perhaps the just answer is for people similar to us to publicly expose these half-truths as openly and recurrently as possible until only the true bigots and fools are vanished citing them.
What year did Michigan become a state?
And i'm not talking roughly speaking being a nouns.Answers: On January 26, 1837, Michigan joined the Union as the nation's 26th state.
1837
Could we enact a law by which motor thieves would be hung by the nouns until dead upon conviction?
Not so long ago surrounded by the days of westward expansion, if a person stole the horse of another, the rustler could expect to be hung if caught. I fail to see how stealing a motor should be considered different. Surely car break-in is more serious in humour as the possibilities for harming innocent individuals is far greater (particularly in the satchel of "joyriding."I am confident of the vociferous objection from "liberal apologists" but would expect support from good statute abiding citizens who recognise the difference between good and desperate.
Answers: So SK: You have posted the following: 'Death cost also should be available for rapists, whom should be horrifically tortured until dead.'. Beware of my impending 'Mis-use Of Whom Act' which will provide for evisceration of anyone found guilty of inappropriately using the word 'whom' surrounded by a misguided attempt to appear educated. Be afraid, SK... be VERY afraid.
It's a moment or two excessive, but you're on the right track.
-MM
Join the 21st century will you?
That's pretty funny, that objecting to torturing and slaughter someone for stealing your junky Camaro is now the work of "liberal apologists".
I contemplate posting silly questions on yahoo should be punishable by annihilation. What do you say?
Oh, read the Constitution, it spells out how and why you are the amazingly type of mentality our Founding Fathers left put a bet on in Europe.
Liberals would protest.
Oh, I see that some already enjoy protested, above.
Put me in charge of this country. I guarantee that crime will be diminshed by 90 per cent or more.
No...
Incidentally a horse theif be ONLY hung if the mob caught him before the regulation. If he was convicted contained by an actual court, he spent time in penal complex and then be released upon serving his time, with a horse (with tack & saddle), (pistol) & ammo, and a small amount of dosh.
It depends on who you mean by "we." Most tellingly, since "we" is a first entity plural pronoun, it depends on who *you* are. Are you a state senator, assemblyman, or other legislator? If not, the answer is probably not. Criminal statutes are not "enacted" by the citizenry in this country.
But even if you are a state legislator, the answer is still probably not. Although commonly, state legislatures can outdo any criminal laws they want pursuant to their "police power," the United States Supreme Court have held repeatedly that "death is different." Because the U.S. Constitution guarantees that one cannot be deprived of "vivacity, liberty, or property minus due process of law," it is unlikely that such a disproportionate punishment would be deem to be constitutionally permissible.
I don't know where on earth this ''Joy Riding'' came from.
Probably impossible to tell apart idiot that coined the phrase ''Happy Slapping''
So I think that the middle-of-the-road hanging from a Lamppost should be deferred to the ''Phrase Coiners'', I might include them self filmed kicked around the pavement as powerfully.
CAR THIEVES however should have cheese telecommunication attached around their nuts and another around their neck. Either appendage tied to Car Bumpers and the cars driven very, remarkably slowly away from each other.
That reduce the Testicular part of the CAR THEFT, and puts a strain on the thinking piece too.
I've counted the number of Lamp Posts between my place and London; I think every Lamp Post could be settled by a hung ''Do-Gooder''.
Similar to the closing shots of the film Spartacus, but lacking the Crucifixions.
The above could suit the ''liberal prison reformers'' too.surely?. (It would mean smaller amount ''scrotes'' in jail).
You are far too attached to your vehicle if you think a personality should be executed for stealing it.
Capital punishment in any context is repugnant. Stealing a sports car is certinaly a punishable and illegal offense, however is your 1987 $200 Yugo really worth the go of another. Is it worth somebody's mother, father, sister, brother, son or daughter? People do some very hugely dumb things. Thier reasons are adjectives, however you loosing your car is not worth somebody loosing thier natural life. A lot of things put people within harms way. Sould we enact a departure penalty for drinking and driving, how just about running a stop sign or red light? You know, I live contained by a very snowy cut of the nation, and unshovelled sidewalks cause various accidents every year. Would also executing the slipshod property owners be warranted?
Really I do not believe it to be the place of mankind to resolve who lives and who dies. Infact we do punish and execute people for making that result. Does it not seem a moment or two ironic that the punishment is the crime?
I am a good upstanding citizen and I assume hanging is too apt for them. I think they should be hung drawn and quarter as a public spectacle, and their bodies exhibited at all local school as an object lesson for prospective saloon thieves.
Then their parents should be incarcerated for vivacity as a punishment for bringing them up badly; and their extended kith and kin including second-cousins-once-removed and spouses thereof should be held in a concentration military camp until they are too old to hold children, and then exiled to San Francisco, that city of iniquity, to ensure that the bleak blood is purged.
I'm with you adjectives the way, mate, and I estimate if we cut off the hand of thieves, the tongues of populace who ask silly questions, the nose of people who smell discouraging and the ears of people who don't listen, our little world would be a better place for righteous (I might even read aloud self-righteous) citizens like ourselves.
I focus we need to write a strongly worded notification to someone.
Did I just accidently procure logged into Yahoo Saudi Arabia?
So, you think it's okay for you (by proxy) to murder someone over money? So, if someone stole $500 from your wallet, you come up with you should have the right to shoot them contained by the head?
I guess I'm a "liberal apologist" for in truth valuing human duration.
Thanks for the two points and seek some professional help out.
my father had a Lada when I be a kid. If someone had stolen that, my mother would own given them a bottle of port and a thankyou card.
The cashier be punished though he remitted the shortfall amount..is it correct to punish?
The man is working in the govt department and posted as cahier and doing works sincerely. impressively decent and sincere. sometime last month a juvenile girl stood at the counter and asked change for 1000 rupees. she unbutton her front portion. seeing her to that area, the banker called her nearer and give one by one..thus 12 notes of 100. she smiled and 2nd button released. she give back 3 100rupees transcribe and asked for a 500 rupees note. he short counting put the notes into box and give a 500 rupees note. Again, she smiled and disappeared the place. while a/c. closing he found some amount missing and he searched for that girl.. he is going on questioning .. but, for not properly closing the a/c and the officer charged him as misappropriated the amount and reduced his increment. 1. a help..please relief him to find the girl. 2. is it right on the part of the officer to punish him as he didn't misappropriated the amount? solve the above 2.Answers: he shouldnt own been fired but he should own been written up..its scam individuals do it all the time to verbs..he shouldnt have be looking down a girls blouse but paying attention to the money he is responsible for
the girl is factor of a scam and the cashier is simply human..but .. he should be reprimanded and maybe put into another undertaking for a period of time.
if you plunge for that, you fall for anything.. the employer whoever they are want strong society who make well brought-up decisions..
Why is my neighbor not in reformatory after is hit me with a beer bottle within front of my child? And another person.?
We spoke to respectively other all the time I even took her to the store alot, but I really never have a problem with it. 1 sunshine I asked her if she could ask her people to not block the driveway? She said she would. Well she asked me to pilfer her to the store one day and I told her no, I thought she be ok with that. All hell broke lose nation blocking the driveway, drinking all times of the nite even the weekdays, and mouth from adjectives that was at hand. I got nurture up and blocked the driveway with my saloon and did not move it and sat on the porch. Trying to prove a point. That did not work. One light of day I came home stop at the margin of both porch and got out to put something on my door and she be sitting on her porch, I went to receive back within my car and she leaned over and hit me near a beer bottle and busted my eyelid open I have 6 stiches and could not remember any one not even my husband and kids. That be 8months ago. went 2 court and my window got busted out 1 afternoon ago. POLICE NO HELP AT ALL. WHAT TO DO????Answers: Did you call the cops? If she busted your eye unscrew its assault. Yes she shoud be in put inside. Did she serve any time at all? If adjectives else fails you shouldnt sit within a situation like that. Its not sheltered for the kids to be there. Move somewhere else or wallet a restraining order.
I mull over you were supposed to hail as the police that day when it happen or at least file a report in the emergency room.
If you record a restraining order you can win your armour.
Call the police, press charges, and file a restraining charge!
call the police beckon a lawyer what the heck she busted your eye undo and nothing be done to her..dont antagonize her by blocking your drive way but you dont own to take someone to the store if you dont want too..if they are blocking your driveway you can send for the police or have them towed
If you go to court, it sounds as if you tried. Did you call the police? Did you folder a police report? Did you file assault charges against her?
It sounds as if you enjoy a terrible relationship near this neighbor. Try your best to stay out of her way and not antagonize her. Write down or otherwise register every exchange. Make sure there are witnesses. If she have several people who will vouch for her and they fiction, you aren't going to have a good enough resolution.
If the police have no evidence, if not a soul saw her or her people bust out your window, there isn't a great deal they can do. Hope you have coup insurance. Ask your neighbors when she isn't around. Maybe someone will come forward. It sounds, though as if they are just bleak. Call the cops if they're drunk in public and hassle you, that 's all you can do.
Can you be a candidate for public organization while holding a job within the same organization?
Answers: Rules differ from region to region. However as a universal rule a representative can not hold a public department (job) however the situation is different if it is an internal selection of representative for example a Trade Union
I was assaulted finishing night? Need to press charges. what do I do?
Long Story short. finishing night my girlfriend and my friend be a club. The Club promoter mistook us for different girls and was trying to create problems beside our friend. As he started walking away my girl and I went to get sure our friend was okay. the guy get in both of our face, grabbed us, shoved, and moved out multiple bruises on us. We did NOTHING to this guy except tell him to stop putting his hand on us.We want to press charges against this guy especially since no one did anything around it at this club. My friend's dad said we need to budge back down within but.I've never had anything similar to this happen up to that time. what do I do?
Answers: You need to walk file a police report asap - The longer you dawdle the more likely that no charges will ever come from it. Don't loaf - go presently if you want something to be done.
that's what the police are for.
but..
you should have call them when it happened !
If you are antediluvian enough to travel to a club surely you know how to dial 911 on your cell phones.
I suspect even if cops were standing right at hand, this would not have gotten any more attention later having them separate you.
Days latter, you will be wasting your time, but you are welcome to try - not that any DA is going to find this worth wasting time over unless you live surrounded by a very small town.
Well You inevitability to go wallet a police report asap - The longer you wait the more potential that no charges will ever come from it. Don't wait - dance now if you want something to be done
Why so many individuals wrongfully sentenced to death contained by US?
125 people on extermination rows have be released with DNA evidence that they be wrongfully convicted. Several states like Virginia, Texas, Illinois etc etc own been found to sentence innocent populace to death. However DNA evidence have only be available in 10% of cases, where on earth someone was sentenced to execution.New Jersey few days rear legs banned release penalty. My query is that what is being done to prevent innocents from mortal put to death?
I do not see any nouns or progress made on this issue and all i hear is that pro-death cost folks saying that executions are a must. Why are they a must if such errors are so endemic?
Answers: "Why so many general public wrongfully sentenced to death surrounded by US?" - Because people put greatly of misplaced faith within eye-witness identification. Eye-witness ID is probably the WORST type of evidence that exists.
The justice system surrounded by the U.S. is not designed to find the truth. It is a competitive game that determines which attorney is better. The Lawyers have perverted the system for their own ego and paychecks.
I am a Republican, NRA member. If someone threatens me or my ancestral I would have no regrets contained by killing them where on earth they stand. I abhor Gun control, lenient short prison sentences and lately about adjectives things leftist. But on this I agree there is too much ambiguity and corruption in our current criminal even-handedness system to allow the state to kill.
Yes I believe that gang member, serial killers, child rapists deserve release but the system for determining guilt or innocence should be fixed first.
IN THE EYES OF LEGAL SYSTEM KILLING AN INNOCENT MAN IS CALLED "JUSTICE". DISHONESTY IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM IS CALLED "IN GOD WE TRUST".
This is why people adjectives over the world hate us.
The judicial system within the States has profoundly of problems, the least of which is lawyer. At each rank there feign problems, much of which stem from our own personal perceptions and how we allow this mangled system to verbs.
For example, witnesses called to the stand move about through a level of "grooming." Their nouns is rehearsed constantly to ensure consistency, misleading rebuttals are memorized, both the prosecutor and the defense also feel a lot of witness appearances, similar to make them where on earth a blue, which to a jury implies honesty. How ridiculous is that? Eyewitness nouns is one of the least reliable.
The medium, holy crap, do they ever play a huge role. Guilt by association sells to the public. Ever observe after making a huge deal of one possible suspect that turns out to be innocent they won't write a retraction, permit alone an apology?
The police are promoted in element by how many arrests they receive - regardless if the evidence supports it. Deals are made with criminals for mediocre sentences and leniency in direct to information that potentially could lead to another's conviction. Is it any wonder they are so heaps dirty cops when the pay sucks and they are looking at millions of dollars contained by drugs and contraband every year?
And there is the those, who are led to believe surrounded by the wrong verses the right, soiled by our own opinions and beliefs so at hand is always bias. Manipulated by adjectives levels of the medium, government, and decree to believe what they want us to. A man whose daughter was raped serves on the jury of a suspected serial rapist beside circumstantial evidence - how do you think he will perceive the grip?
Everyone has their feelings of who should be on death row, and if in that should even be the death cost. One thing to be exact proved is the fact the release penalty is not a deterrent to crime.
So really within is no answer without self-reflection.
Is this a harrasment?
i have emotional state to this coworker,hes 45 yrsold,we are closed... cant hide my mood anymore,i told him- me and my hsbnd just divorced,im surrounded by love again, i love you. he said, so am i..,while on my way to the door.. after 2 days(my days off)he said,what you said to me,same sensations too... we cant talked bec. we are working... it be his day bad, i phoned him,text, voice post,he never replied.. when we saw each other at work,i asked him your not answering me.. he get mad, shouted at me infrnt of customers adage, STOP HARRASING!!!! IM NOT INTERESTED IN YOU!!... he never gave me the chance to talked... i be shocked, wondering...my messages were
r u at wrk,but for pls,call
we merely start our relation, ur hurting me
have time for me too.
he reported this to the organization as harrasment... i wrote him apology explaining,we are not same nationality,for us,commitment and relation exists,i dnt knw its harsng to u
Answers: No, you weren't harrassing him-find someone who will appreciate you and not treat you resembling crap. He's not worth your time.
Maybe you shouldn't have approached him at work, but that's no excuse. When he disrespected you at work, that should've be it for you...let him be and show him exactly what he's missing out on.
Not harrasment at adjectives.
I mean i guess you shouldnt be conversation so much at work but if he said he loved you also then i dont see how he would christen that harrasment.
Also it doesnt seem similar to it went on for to long. Harrasment is almost adjectives the time been going on for a long time of year of time.
You are harassing.
What agency would I report a former employer for paying employees "lower than the table" paybacks are a sweet bi...
Answers: Your local Better Business Bureau and your local IRS. This happened to me. I received bread with a slip showing my taxes withheld. When I go to file taxes at the termination of the year, I had to database a complaint about the business for not have given me a W2 form. I was still competent to file me taxes though because I kept my own review of hrs. worked and tips earned. They get it good.
The US Department of Labor
www.dol.gov/
former employer did this? so you know it then. You did nought - now they fired you and you want revenge?
do nought and do right next time.
Just turn to the Dept' works and pensions,and they will grant you a juicy bonus. You f*cking cretin. You better hope they don't find out!! Have a Happy Christmas ????????????????
More Questions and Answers:
[305] - [478] - [1105] - [1465] - [2441] - [609] - [1883] - [567] - [451] - [1063] - [866] - [1098] - [780] - [1220] - [1742] - [1398] - [1285] - [186] - [225] - [2051]
The answers post by the user, for information only, FreeLawAnswer.com does not guarantee the right.
Answer question: